Spatially fractionated radiation therapy: a critical review on current status of clinical and preclinical studies and knowledge gaps

Spatially fractionated radiation therapy (SFRT) is a therapeutic approach with the potential to disrupt the classical paradigms of conventional radiation therapy. The high spatial dose modulation in SFRT activates distinct radiobiological mechanisms which lead to a remarkable increase in normal tissue tolerances. Several decades of clinical use and numerous preclinical experiments suggest that SFRT has the potential to increase the therapeutic index, especially in bulky and radioresistant tumors. To unleash the full potential of SFRT a deeper understanding of the underlying biology and its relationship with the complex dosimetry of SFRT is needed. This review provides a critical analysis of the field, discussing not only the main clinical and preclinical findings but also analyzing the main knowledge gaps in a holistic way.

Feasibility Study of 3D-VMAT-Based GRID Therapy

Background: Spatially fractionated radiotherapy (GRID) could effectively de-bulk tumor volumes for shallow and deep-seated locally advanced tumors. A new treatment planning method using the three-dimensional-volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) technique combined with a novel, software-generated, virtual GRID block (VGB) was developed which allows better conformity plans (VMAT-GRID) and maintain the GRID dosimetric characteristics. The dosimetric metrics calculated via the valley/peak ratio (D_min/D_max), D₉₀/D₁₀, gross tumor volume (GTV) mean dose (D_mean), GTV equivalent uniform dose (EUD), and normal tissue maximum dose. Methods: Twenty-five patients with tumor volumes ranging between 71.6 cc and 4683 cc at various tumor sites were retrospectively studied. The prescription was 20 Gy to the maximum point of GTV in a single fraction, and the VMAT-GRID plan was generated using 6 MV/10 MV flattening-filter-free beams. Results: The optimized VGB was designed with the median center-to-center distance of 27 mm, and 9 mm for the median diameter of the opening area in this study. These 2 values can be used to design any optimized VGB, the final VGB may be modified to generate a patient-specific VGB. The median GTV mean dose was 918 (877- 938) cGy, and the median GTV EUD dose was 818 (597-916) cGy. In terms of dose inhomogeneity, the median valley-to-peak dose ratio was 0.07 (0.02-0.26); and the median ratio of D₉₀/D₁₀ was 0.70 (0.38-0.94). For the organ-at-risk doses, there was a rapid dose drop-off in the normal tissue area immediately adjacent to the target, and the maximum global doses were all located inside the GTV. Conclusion: Our results indicated that the VMAT-GRID planning approach could successfully deliver dose with acceptable GRID dose metric while sparing the normal tissue especially in the region near the target due to the rapid dose drop-off and restricting maximum dose inside the target.

Investigating spatial fractionation and radiation induced bystander effects: a mathematical modelling approach

Radiation induced bystander effects (RIBEs) have been shown to cause death in cells receiving little or no physical dose. In standard radiotherapy, where uniform fields are delivered and all cells are directly exposed to radiation, this phenomenon can be neglected. However, the role of RIBEs may become more influential when heterogeneous fields are considered. Mathematical modelling can be used to determine how these heterogeneous fields might influence cell survival, but most established techniques account only for the direct effects of radiation. To gain a full appreciation of how non-uniform fields impact cell survival, it is also necessary to consider the indirect effects of radiation. In this work, we utilise a mathematical model that accounts for both the direct effects of radiation on cells and RIBEs. This model is used to investigate how spatially fractionated radiotherapy plans impact cell survivalin vitro. These predictions were compared to survival in normal and cancerous cells following exposure to spatially fractionated plans using a clinical linac. The model is also used to explore how spatially fractionated radiotherapy will impact tumour controlin vivo. Results suggest that spatially fractionated plans are associated with higher equivalent uniform doses than conventional uniform plans at clinically relevant doses. The model predicted only small changes changes in normal tissue complication probability, compared to the larger protection seen clinically. This contradicts a central paradigm of radiotherapy where uniform fields are assumed to maximise cell kill and may be important for future radiotherapy optimisation.

A Multi-Scale and Multi-Technique Approach for the Characterization of the Effects of Spatially Fractionated X-ray Radiation Therapies in a Preclinical Model

The purpose of this study is to use a multi-technique approach to detect the effects of spatially fractionated X-ray Microbeam (MRT) and Minibeam Radiation Therapy (MB) and to compare them to seamless Broad Beam (BB) irradiation. Healthy- and Glioblastoma (GBM)-bearing male Fischer rats were irradiated in-vivo on the right brain hemisphere with MRT, MB and BB delivering three different doses for each irradiation geometry. Brains were analyzed post mortem by multi-scale X-ray Phase Contrast Imaging-Computed Tomography (XPCI-CT), histology, immunohistochemistry, X-ray Fluorescence (XRF), Small- and Wide-Angle X-ray Scattering (SAXS/WAXS). XPCI-CT discriminates with high sensitivity the effects of MRT, MB and BB irradiations on both healthy and GBM-bearing brains producing a first-time 3D visualization and morphological analysis of the radio-induced lesions, MRT and MB induced tissue ablations, the presence of hyperdense deposits within specific areas of the brain and tumor evolution or regression with respect to the evaluation made few days post-irradiation with an in-vivo magnetic resonance imaging session. Histology, immunohistochemistry, SAXS/WAXS and XRF allowed identification and classification of these deposits as hydroxyapatite crystals with the coexistence of Ca, P and Fe mineralization, and the multi-technique approach enabled the realization, for the first time, of the map of the differential radiosensitivity of the different brain areas treated with MRT and MB. 3D XPCI-CT datasets enabled also the quantification of tumor volumes and Ca/Fe deposits and their full-organ visualization. The multi-scale and multi-technique approach enabled a detailed visualization and classification in 3D of the radio-induced effects on brain tissues bringing new essential information towards the clinical implementation of the MRT and MB radiation therapy techniques.

Lattice or Oxygen-Guided Radiotherapy: What If They Converge? Possible Future Directions in the Era of Immunotherapy

Palliative radiotherapy has a great role in the treatment of large tumor masses. However, treating a bulky disease could be difficult, especially in critical anatomical areas. In daily clinical practice, short course hypofractionated radiotherapy is delivered in order to control the symptomatic disease. Radiation fields generally encompass the entire tumor mass, which is homogeneously irradiated. Recent technological advances enable delivering a higher radiation dose in small areas within a large mass. This goal, previously achieved thanks to the GRID approach, is now achievable using the newest concept of LATTICE radiotherapy (LT-RT). This kind of treatment allows exploiting various radiation effects, such as bystander and abscopal effects. These events may be enhanced by the concomitant use of immunotherapy, with the latter being ever more successfully delivered in cancer patients. Moreover, a critical issue in the treatment of large masses is the inhomogeneous intratumoral distribution of well-oxygenated and hypo-oxygenated areas. It is well known that hypoxic areas are more resistant to the killing effect of radiation, hence the need to target them with higher aggressive doses. This concept introduces the "oxygen-guided radiation therapy" (OGRT), which means looking for suitable hypoxic markers to implement in PET/CT and Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Future treatment strategies are likely to involve combinations of LT-RT, OGRT, and immunotherapy. In this paper, we review the radiobiological rationale behind a potential benefit of LT-RT and OGRT, and we summarize the results reported in the few clinical trials published so far regarding these issues. Lastly, we suggest what future perspectives may emerge by combining immunotherapy with LT-RT/OGRT.

Combined High-Dose LATTICE Radiation Therapy and Immune Checkpoint Blockade for Advanced Bulky Tumors: The Concept and a Case Report

Although the combination of immune checkpoint blockades with high dose of radiation has indicated the potential of co-stimulatory effects, consistent clinical outcome has been yet to be demonstrated. Bulky tumors present challenges for radiation treatment to achieve high rate of tumor control due to large tumor sizes and normal tissue toxicities. As an alternative, spatially fractionated radiotherapy (SFRT) technique has been applied, in the forms of GRID or LATTICE radiation therapy (LRT), to safely treat bulky tumors. When used alone in a single or a few fractions, GRID or LRT can be best classified as palliative or tumor de-bulking treatments. Since only a small fraction of the tumor volume receive high dose in a SFRT treatment, even with the anticipated bystander effects, total tumor eradications are rare. Backed by the evidence of immune activation of high dose radiation, it is logical to postulate that the combination of High-Dose LATTICE radiation therapy (HDLRT) with immune checkpoint blockade would be effective and could subsequently lead to improved local tumor control without added toxicities, through augmenting the effects of radiation in-situ vaccine and T-cell priming. We herein present a case of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with multiple metastases. The patient received various types of palliative radiation treatments with combined chemotherapies and immunotherapies to multiple lesions. One of the metastatic lesions measuring 63.2 cc was treated with HDLRT combined with anti-PD1 immunotherapy. The metastatic mass regressed 77.84% over one month after the treatment, and had a complete local response (CR) five months after the treatment. No treatment-related side effects were observed during the follow-up exams. None of the other lesions receiving palliative treatments achieved CR. The dramatic differential outcome of this case lends support to the aforementioned postulate and prompts for further systemic clinical studies.

Comparison of treatment planning approaches for spatially fractionated irradiation of deep tumors

Purpose

The purpose of this work was to compare the dosimetry and delivery times of 3D‐conformal (3DCRT)‐, volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT)‐, and tomotherapy‐based approaches for spatially fractionated radiation therapy for deep tumor targets.

Methods

Two virtual GRID phantoms were created consisting of 7 “target” cylinders (1‐cm diameter) aligned longitudinally along the tumor in a honey‐comb pattern, mimicking a conventional GRID block, with 2‐cm center‐to‐center spacing (GRID_2 cm) and 3‐cm center‐to‐center spacing (GRID_3 cm), all contained within a larger cylinder (8 and 10 cm in diameter for the GRID_2 cm and GRID_3 cm, respectively). In a single patient, a GRID_3 cm structure was created within the gross tumor volume (GTV). Tomotherapy, VMAT (6 MV + 6 MV‐flattening‐filter‐free) and multi‐leaf collimator segment 3DCRT (6 MV) plans were created using commercially available software. Two tomotherapy plans were created with field widths (TOMO_2.5 cm) 2.5 cm and (TOMO_5 cm) 5 cm. Prescriptions for all plans were set to deliver a mean dose of 15 Gy to the GRID targets in one fraction. The mean dose to the GRID target and the heterogeneity of the dose distribution (peak‐to‐valley and peak‐to‐edge dose ratios) inside the GRID target were obtained. The volume of normal tissue receiving 7.5 Gy was determined.

Results

The peak‐to‐valley ratios for GRID_2 cm/GRID_3 cm/Patient were 2.1/2.3/2.8, 1.7/1.5/2.8, 1.7/1.9/2.4, and 1.8/2.0/2.8 for the 3DCRT, VMAT, TOMO_5 cm, and TOMO_2.5 cm plans, respectively. The peak‐to‐edge ratios for GRID_2 cm/GRID_3 cm/Patient were 2.8/3.2/5.4, 2.1/1.8/5.4, 2.0/2.2/3.9, 2.1/2.7/5.2 and for the 3DCRT, VMAT, TOMO_5 cm, and TOMO_2.5 cm plans, respectively. The volume of normal tissue receiving 7.5 Gy was lowest in the TOMO_2.5 cm plan (GRID_2 cm/GRID_3 cm/Patient = 54 cm³/19 cm³/10 cm³). The VMAT plans had the lowest delivery times (GRID_2 cm/GRID_3 cm/Patient = 17 min/8 min/9 min).

Conclusion

Our results present, for the first time, preliminary evidence comparing IMRT‐GRID approaches which result in high‐dose “islands” within a target, mimicking what is achieved with a conventional GRID block but without high‐dose “tail” regions outside of the target. These approaches differ modestly in their ability to achieve high peak‐to‐edge ratios and also differ in delivery times.