Comparison between super-responders and non-super-responders in psoriasis under adalimumab treatment: a real-life cohort study on the effectiveness and drug survival over one-year

BACKGROUND

Data on the characteristics and treatment outcomes of super-responders and non-super-responders in psoriasis under adalimumab treatment are limited.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis from psoriatic patients treated with adalimumab was compared to characterize super-responders vs non-super-responders' groups, identify factors associated with super response, and assess treatment outcomes after switching.

RESULTS

15 out of 70 (21.4%) patients were categorized as super-responder. The proportion of patients achieving a PASI 100 response was significantly higher in super-responders than non-super-responders at weeks 12, 24, and 52. Female sex and Charlson Co-morbidity Index were significantly associated with super-responders. A high level of high-density lipoprotein was independently associated with PASI 90 response at weeks 24 and 52. Additionally, nearly 35%-43% of non-super-responders switching to interleukin-17A (IL-17A) inhibitors may achieve a PASI 100 response at week 12. In contrast, all super-responders switching to IL-17A inhibitors achieved a PASI 100 response at week 4.

CONCLUSIONS

Super-responders treated with adalimumab have a higher rate of being female and fewer comorbidities. And super-responders have better PASI responses than non-super-responders, whether the patients were treated with adalimumab or switched to IL-17A inhibitors.

Evaluation of super-responders to cardiac resynchronization therapy in the presence of left bundle branch block and absence of scar in the posterolateral wall of the left ventricle

Patients with heart failure (HF) undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) who exhibit above-expected improvement are known as super-responders. We assessed the rate of super-responders in a population with left bundle branch block (LBBB) > 150 ms in the absence of scar tissue in the left ventricular posterolateral wall as well as prognostic variables. In this prospective observational cohort study (n=20) an electrocardiogram (ECG) was performed pre- and post-CRT. The classic and Strauss LBBB criteria were adopted (> 150 ms). The percent (%) reduction of the QRS was calculated after implantation. All patients responded to the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure questionnaire and underwent an echocardiogram to measure left ventricular ejection function (LVEF), left atrium (LA) diameter, left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVEDV), left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVESV), and left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD) pre- and 6 months post-CRT. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) measured the presence of scar tissue in the posterolateral LV wall and the total scar burden (% LV mass). Fisher's exact test and the Mann-Whitney test were performed to evaluate possible prognostic variables. The mean age was 58.20±8.79 years old, 60% female, with a mean LVEF of 28.15±5.10%, ECG with LBBB mean QRS of 162.15±7.86 ms, LBBB > 150 ms with Strauss standard in 90% of cases, and 90% with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy. Twelve cases (60%) of super-responders (reduction > 30% LVESV after 6 months) were observed. Super-responders did not present a difference in response in sex (12 vs 8 P=0.67), age (58.67 vs 57.7 P=087), Minnesota quality of life (55.50 vs 67.70 P=0.2), % initial QRS reduction (21.16 vs 18.69 P=0.21), LVEF (29.25 vs 26.5 P=0.38), LVEDD (66.33 vs 67.67 P=0.83), LVEDV (211.16 vs 228.53 P=0.75), LVESV (145.83 vs 167.00 P=0.75), or LA diameter (41.58 vs 43.63 P=0.45). The presence of LBBB > 150 ms, using the Strauss standard (90%) and the absence of scar in the posterolateral wall may account for these positive results. Super-responders benefit the most from CRT, and the results of this study can contribute to a better selection of CRT candidates.