1
|
Berinson B, Spenke L, Krivec L, Tanida K, Both A, Keller J, Rolvien T, Christner M, Lütgehetmann M, Aepfelbacher M, Klatte TO, Rohde H. Performance and Hypothetical Impact on Joint Infection Management of the BioFire Joint Infection Panel: a Retrospective Analysis. J Clin Microbiol 2023; 61:e0059223. [PMID: 37439678 PMCID: PMC10446873 DOI: 10.1128/jcm.00592-23] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2023] [Accepted: 06/28/2023] [Indexed: 07/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Pathogen identification is key in septic arthritis. Culture-based techniques are challenging, especially when patients have been pretreated with antibiotics or when difficult-to-culture bacteria are encountered. The BioFire joint infection assay (BJA) is a multiplex PCR panel which detects 31 of the most prevalent bacterial and fungal pathogens causing septic arthritis. Here, 123 cryoconserved contemporary synovial fluid samples from 120 patients underwent BJA analysis. Results were compared to those of culture-based diagnostics (standard of care [SOC]). Clinical data were collected, and the possible impact of the molecular diagnostic application on patient management was evaluated. Fifteen of 123 synovial fluid cultures grew bacterial pathogens. All on-panel pathogens (9/15) were correctly identified by the BJA. The BJA identified four additional bacterial pathogens in four SOC-negative cases. BJA sensitivity and specificity were 100% (95% confidence interval [CI], 69.2% to 100%) and 100% (95% CI, 96.8% to 100%), respectively. Compared to the SOC, the BJA would have resulted in faster provision of species identification and molecular susceptibility data by 49 h and 99 h, respectively. Clinical data analysis indicates that in BJA-positive cases, faster species ID could have led to timelier optimization of antibiotic therapy. This retrospective study demonstrates high sensitivity and specificity of the BJA to detect on-panel organisms in bacterial arthritis. The usefulness of the BJA in prosthetic-joint infections is limited, as important pathogens (i.e., coagulase negative staphylococci and Cutibacterium acnes) are not covered. Evidence from patient data analysis suggests that the assay might prove valuable for optimizing patient management in acute arthritis related to fastidious organisms or for patients who received antibiotics prior to specimen collection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin Berinson
- Institute for Medical Microbiology, Virology and Hygiene, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Laura Spenke
- Institute for Medical Microbiology, Virology and Hygiene, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Lukas Krivec
- Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Konstantin Tanida
- Institute for Medical Microbiology, Virology and Hygiene, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Anna Both
- Institute for Medical Microbiology, Virology and Hygiene, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Johannes Keller
- Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Tim Rolvien
- Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Martin Christner
- Institute for Medical Microbiology, Virology and Hygiene, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Marc Lütgehetmann
- Institute for Medical Microbiology, Virology and Hygiene, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Martin Aepfelbacher
- Institute for Medical Microbiology, Virology and Hygiene, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Till Orla Klatte
- Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Holger Rohde
- Institute for Medical Microbiology, Virology and Hygiene, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Berneking L, Haas M, Frielinghaus L, Berinson B, Lütgehetmann M, Christner M, Aepfelbacher M, Gerlach U, Seide K, Both A, Rohde H. Evaluation of a syndromic panel polymerase chain reaction (spPCR) assay for the diagnosis of device-associated bone and joint infections (BJI). Int J Infect Dis 2022; 116:283-288. [PMID: 35031396 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijid.2022.01.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2021] [Revised: 01/05/2022] [Accepted: 01/05/2022] [Indexed: 10/19/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Pathogen detection is crucial for diagnosis and targeted therapy in implant-associated bone and joint infections (BJI). Culture-based microbiology regularly fails to identify causative pathogens. This study evaluated the diagnostic accuracy and clinical usefulness of a syndromic panel polymerase chain reaction (spPCR) assay targeting common BJI pathogens in tissue specimens from patients with implant-associated BJI. METHODS Results obtained by spPCR assay and a 16S rDNA PCR were compared with results obtained from a standard of care (SOC) culture-based diagnostics, serving as a gold standard. In total, 126 specimens obtained from 73 patients were analyzed. RESULTS The spPCR assay correctly identified 33/40 culture-positive samples (82.5 %) and was positive in 9/86 (10.5 %) culture-negative samples, resulting in an overall sensitivity of 84.6 % (95% confidence interval [CI] 68.79-93.59%) and specificity of 89.35% (95% CI 80.6-94.81%). The spPCR was more sensitive compared with the 16S rDNA PCR (37.5%). The spPCR identified pathogens in 7/51 (13.7%) SOC-negative patients. Re-evaluation of spPCR results in clinical context suggested their clinical significance. CONCLUSION An spPCR assay targeting common pathogens causing implant-associated BJI may help to identify causative agents in culture-negative cases. As false-negative results are possible, spPCR assays appear as an add-on approach for pathogen detection in implant-associated BJI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Berneking
- Institut für Medizinische Mikrobiologie, Virologie und Hygiene, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Michaela Haas
- Septische Unfallchirurgie und Orthopädie, BG Klinikum Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Lisa Frielinghaus
- Institut für Medizinische Mikrobiologie, Virologie und Hygiene, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Benjamin Berinson
- Institut für Medizinische Mikrobiologie, Virologie und Hygiene, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Marc Lütgehetmann
- Institut für Medizinische Mikrobiologie, Virologie und Hygiene, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Martin Christner
- Institut für Medizinische Mikrobiologie, Virologie und Hygiene, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Martin Aepfelbacher
- Institut für Medizinische Mikrobiologie, Virologie und Hygiene, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Ulf Gerlach
- Septische Unfallchirurgie und Orthopädie, BG Klinikum Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Klaus Seide
- Septische Unfallchirurgie und Orthopädie, BG Klinikum Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Anna Both
- Institut für Medizinische Mikrobiologie, Virologie und Hygiene, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Holger Rohde
- Institut für Medizinische Mikrobiologie, Virologie und Hygiene, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|