Translating mesenchymal stem cell and their exosome research into GMP compliant advanced therapy products: Promises, problems and prospects

Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are one of the few stem cell types used in clinical practice as therapeutic agents for immunomodulation and ischemic tissue repair, due to their unique paracrine capacity, multiple differentiation potential, active components in exosomes, and effective mitochondria donation. At present, MSCs derived from tissues such as bone marrow and umbilical cord are widely applied in preclinical and clinical studies. Nevertheless, there remain challenges to the maintenance of consistently good quality MSCs derived from different donors or tissues, directly impacting their application as advanced therapy products. In this review, we discuss the promises, problems, and prospects associated with translation of MSC research into a pharmaceutical product. We review the hurdles encountered in translation of MSCs and MSC-exosomes from the research bench to an advanced therapy product compliant with good manufacturing practice (GMP). These difficulties include how to set up GMP-compliant protocols, what factors affect raw material selection, cell expansion to product formulation, establishment of quality control (QC) parameters, and quality assurance to comply with GMP standards. To avoid human error and reduce the risk of contamination, an automatic, closed system that allows real-time monitoring of QC should be considered. We also highlight potential advantages of pluripotent stem cells as an alternative source for MSC and exosomes generation and manufacture.

Back to the Cradle of Cytotherapy: Integrating a Century of Clinical Research and Biotechnology-Based Manufacturing for Modern Tissue-Specific Cellular Treatments in Switzerland

Empirically studied by Dr. Brown-Séquard in the late 1800s, cytotherapies were later democratized by Dr. Niehans during the twentieth century in Western Switzerland. Many local cultural landmarks around the Léman Riviera are reminiscent of the inception of such cell-based treatments. Despite the discreet extravagance of the remaining heirs of "living cell therapy" and specific enforcements by Swiss health authorities, current interest in modern and scientifically sound cell-based regenerative medicine has never been stronger. Respective progress made in bioengineering and in biotechnology have enabled the clinical implementation of modern cell-based therapeutic treatments within updated medical and regulatory frameworks. Notably, the Swiss progenitor cell transplantation program has enabled the gathering of two decades of clinical experience in Lausanne for the therapeutic management of cutaneous and musculoskeletal affections, using homologous allogeneic cell-based approaches. While striking conceptual similarities exist between the respective works of the fathers of cytotherapy and of modern highly specialized clinicians, major and important iterative updates have been implemented, centered on product quality and risk-analysis-based patient safety insurance. This perspective article highlights some historical similarities and major evolutive differences, particularly regarding product safety and quality issues, characterizing the use of cell-based therapies in Switzerland over the past century. We outline the vast therapeutic potential to be harnessed for the benefit of overall patient health and the importance of specific scientific methodological aspects.

Regulatory Decision Making in Canada-Exploring New Frontiers in Patient Involvement

Recent legislative amendments aim to enhance the transparency of the regulatory review processes about drugs, and provide public information about Health Canada's review decisions. There is also growing recognition of the value, with respect to regulatory benefit-risk assessment, of information that could be gathered from patients-the direct users of these products. Patients can provide unique insights into practical aspects of living with their disease and its treatments-as well as gaps in treatment needs. An enhanced understanding of patients' experiences and perspectives can contribute directly to better-informed decision making about these products by regulators. Health Canada is currently exploring and examining the most effective ways to collect and consider patient input in the evaluation of therapeutic products. As part of this process, Health Canada is assessing the suitability of other existing models through environmental scans, discussions with other health authorities, and pilot projects. Lessons learned from these models can inform best practices and opportunities for patient involvement when designing a model to meet Canada's needs and context. Health Canada launched a Patient Involvement Pilot Project in 2014 to simulate how input from patients, their caregivers, health care professionals, and patient groups could be collected and incorporated in the drug submission review process. This ongoing experience and continuous learning will define better how to incorporate patient input into benefit-risk assessment and regulatory decision making throughout the life cycle of therapeutic products in Canada.

The future of monoclonal antibody technology

With the rapid growth of monoclonal antibody-based products, new technologies have emerged for creating modified forms of antibodies, including fragments, conjugates and multi-specific antibodies. We created a database of 450 therapeutic antibodies in development to determine which technologies and indications will constitute the "next generation" of antibody products. We conclude that the antibodies of the future will closely resemble the antibodies that have already been approved for commercial sale.