Limb Salvage by Means of Hindfoot Arthrodesis Utilizing Bulk Allograft and External Fixation

FORMAT

Retrospective Review.

LENGTH OF FOLLOW-UP

18 months.

CLASSIFICATION

Rearfoot and Ankle Reconstruction.

METHODOLOGY

Level 4 Retrospective Review.

PROCEDURES

A retrospective review was performed of 6 patients who had undergone limb salvage procedures between January 2016 and April 2019. Patients underwent surgery due to severe limb-threatening diagnosis including Charcot and/or osteomyelitis. Salvage arthrodesis was performed with bulk femoral head allograft incorporation using a hexapod external fixation system. The external fixation was retained for an average of 16 weeks. All patients were followed for a postoperative period of 16 months.

RESULTS

Successful rearfoot arthrodesis and limb salvage was achieved in ⅚ (83%) of patients.

DISCUSSION

This review demonstrates that limb salvage and arthrodesis are possible using femoral head allograft incorporation by external fixation alone. The involved patients had resolution of the osteomyelitis and Charcot deformity, salvage arthrodesis of the rearfoot and avoidance of a major limb amputation.

LEVELS OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Total Talus Replacements

Background

Total talus replacements are a surgical treatment for talar avascular necrosis (AVN) replacing the entire talus. The potential for total talus replacements has increased with the advent of patient-specific implants using 3D printing based on computed tomographic scanning of the ipsilateral or contralateral talus. The primary aim of this review is to summarize the literature on total talus replacements, providing a historical survey, indications, controversies, complications, survival, and functional outcomes.

Methods

A systematic review was performed. Articles with survival of total talus replacements were included. Basic percentages and a critical review of the literature was performed.

Results

Nine articles with 115 patients were included. The mean age ranged from 27.6 to 72 years, but with 5 studies having a mean age of <50 years. Mean follow-up ranged from 12.8 to 152 months. The most common indication was avascular necrosis in 67 patients (58%). Five studies used customized implants and 4 studies used 3D printing. Four studies used ceramic prostheses, 3 cobalt chromium, 1 stainless steel, and 1 titanium with ceramic surface. Three studies involved a talus replacement in conjunction with an ankle replacement. Postoperative complications ranged from 0% to 33%. Of 24 functional outcomes scores, 66.7% demonstrated significant improvement.

Conclusion

Total talus replacements are a promising alternative to tibiotalocalcaneal fusion for patients with avascular necrosis of the talus; however, further studies are required to ensure reliable outcomes prior to widespread adoption of this technology.

Level of Evidence

Level IV, review of case series.

Transportal Tibiotalocalcaneal Nail Ankle Arthrodesis: A Systematic Review of Initial Series

Background

There is currently a scarcity of information and consensus for transportal (arthroscopic or fluoroscopic) joint preparation during tibiotalocalcaneal (TTC) fusion, and therefore this review aims to summarize the available techniques and to evaluate the outcomes after this procedure.

Methods

A systematic electronic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Web of Science was performed for all English-language studies published from their inception to April 4, 2022. All articles addressing arthroscopy in TTC nailing were eligible for inclusion. The PRISMA Checklist guided the reporting and data abstraction. Descriptive statistics are presented.

Result

A total of 5 studies with 65 patients were included for analysis. All studies used arthroscopic portals for tibiotalar and subtalar joint preparation (in 4 studies) prior to TTC nailing, with 4 studies using an arthroscope and 1 study using fluoroscopy. The overall major complication rate was 13.8%; however, there was only 1 instance of deep wound infection (1.5%) and 4 instances of surgical site infections (6.2%). Full fusion was achieved in 86% of patients with an average time to fusion of 12.9 weeks. The mean American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot score preoperatively was 34.0 and postoperatively was 70.5.

Conclusion

Although limited by the number of studies, transportal joint preparation during TTC nail ankle fusion is associated with good rates of complications and successful fusion.

Level of Evidence

Level III, systematic review of Level III-IV studies.

Change in Height Following Tibiotalocalcaneal Arthrodesis: Retrospective Radiographic Analysis

Tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis (TTCA) with an intramedullary rod is a viable treatment option for a myriad of pathologies involving the foot and ankle. While the current literature has focused on fixation techniques, deformity correction, and clinical outcomes, we are unaware of any studies specifically examining change in height following a TTCA. In the present study, we retrospectively analyzed radiographs with novel radiographic techniques to determine the change in height from preoperative to postoperative radiographs following TTCA. Patients were divided into 3 categories: Charcot, arthritis, and pes planus as the indication for surgical intervention. We found that Charcot and arthritis had an average decrease in height on anterior and posterior measurements of the height from the distal tibia to the calcaneus, while pes planus had an increase in height. The average Charcot change in height was -12.0 ± 24.4 mm anteriorly and -7.6 ± 15.5 mm posteriorly. The average change in height for the arthritis group was -6.9 ± 6.7 mm anteriorly and -3.8 ± 5.8 mm posteriorly. The pes planus group was found to have an average increase in height 0.5 ± 8.0 mm anteriorly and 2.9 ± 5.8 mm posteriorly. Overall, we found a statistically significant difference in height change between the 3 groups in anterior measurements (p = .012) and posterior measurement (p = .006). We recommend surgeons who perform this procedure to be aware of the potential change in height to better tailor surgical and postoperative care.

Tibial Lengthening and Intramedullary Nail Fixation for Hindfoot Charcot Neuroarthropathy

Hindfoot and ankle Charcot neuroarthropathy is a challenging condition to treat, specifically with segmental bone defects secondary to avascular necrosis or infection. Several techniques exist alongside continued challenges of nonunion and complication rates. The authors assert that combining distal tibial distraction osteogenesis with external fixation in tibiocalcaneal or tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis should be considered an effective method for management of complex Charcot neuroarthropathy conditions of the ankle. This staged procedure technique resulted in a high rate of union in patients who are often considered a high risk for nonunion, as well as eradication of infection, minimal soft tissue disruption, and improvement in limb length.

Increased Arthrodesis Rates in Charcot Neuroarthropathy Utilizing Distal Tibial Distraction Osteogenesis Principles

Charcot neuroarthropathy of the hindfoot and ankle poses substantial challenges due to deformity, segmental bone loss, chronic infection, and difficulty with bracing. Hindfoot or ankle arthrodesis is often employed at high rates of complications and nonunion. This study reports 15 consecutive patients with Charcot neuroarthropathy who underwent tibiotalocalcaneal or tibiocalcaneal fusion with simultaneous distal tibial distraction osteogenesis with a mean follow-up period of 20.2 ± 5.66 months. Arthrodesis rate was 93.3% (14 patients) with mean time to fusion of 4.75 ± 3.4 months. One hypertrophic nonunion occurred at the arthrodesis site. Complete consolidation of 4 cortices was achieved at the distraction site in 93.3% of patients (14 patients) with a mean duration to consolidation of 9.8 ± 3.3 months. One patient experienced hypertrophic nonunion at the regeneration site. The authors report a technique to enhance arthrodesis rates in Charcot neuroarthropathy by combining distal tibial distraction osteogenesis with simultaneous tibiotalocalcaneal or tibiocalcaneal arthrodesis for hindfoot fusion and salvage. Distraction osteogenesis supports enhanced vascularity to the arthrodesis site.Level of Clinical Evidence: Level 4.

Tibiotalocalcaneal Intramedullary Nailing for Unstable Geriatric Ankle Fractures

BACKGROUND

Tibiotalocalcaneal (TTC) intramedullary nailing has been suggested as an alternative to open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) for the primary treatment of unstable fragility ankle fractures with a poor soft tissue envelope. This study aims to investigate the clinical efficacy of TTC intramedullary nail fixation for the primary treatment of unstable ankle fractures in frail elderly patients with poor soft tissue condition, by assessing the number of postoperative complications and the patient-reported functional outcomes.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was performed including patients with an unstable ankle fracture treated between 2015 and 2019 with TTC stabilization using a retrograde intramedullary hindfoot nail that was inserted without joint preparation and allowing immediate weight-bearing postoperatively. The primary outcome was the total number of postoperative complications.

RESULTS

A total of 10 patients were included out of 365 operatively treated ankle fractures. The mean age was 85.2 years (range 66-92) with a mean follow-up of 11.2 months (range 6-16). Fracture types included AO/OTA 44-B2 (n = 1), 44-B3 (n = 6), 44-C1 (n = 2) and 44-C3 (n = 1). Postoperative complications were observed in 4 patients (40%), including 3 nonunions, 2 implant related complications and 1 wound infection. No wound healing disorder or below-the-knee amputation was observed. Four patients (40%) deceased between post-operative 6 to 16 months due to medical conditions unrelated to surgery. The mean Foot and Ankle Outcome Score was 52.6 (range 44.2-73.8).

CONCLUSION

Hindfoot nailingis a viable treatment option in selected high-risk patients with an advanced age, unstable ankle fractures with significant bone loss, poor soft tissue condition and/or severely impaired pre-injury mobility. In a frail geriatric population, hindfoot nailing may be a safe alternative fixation method with a low risk of wound complication or major amputation. However, unprepared joint may lead to symptomatic nonunion after TTC intramedullary nailing.

Midterm Results of Radiographic and Functional Outcomes After Tibiotalocalcaneal Arthrodesis With Bulk Femoral Head Allograft

Background: Tibiotalocalcaneal (TTC) arthrodesis implementing adjunctive allografts is a method of limb salvage for patients with complex hindfoot osseous deficits, though outcome results are limited. The purposes of this study were to assess functional and radiographic outcomes after TTC arthrodesis with femoral head allograft and retrospectively identify prognostic factors. Methods: The authors reviewed 24 TTC arthrodesis procedures with bulk femoral head allografts performed by a single surgeon from 2004 to 2016. Radiographic union at the ankle and subtalar joints along with stability of the allograft were assessed. Patients who had clinically successful arthrodeses were contacted to score the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure-Activities of Daily Living (FAAM-ADL) questionnaire, Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain, and Short Form-12 (SF-12) at a mean of 58.0 months (range, 28-102) postoperatively. Results: Complete radiographic union of involved joints was achieved in 15 patients (63%) and in 75% (36/48) of all joints; 21 ankles (88%) were assessed to be radiographically stable at final follow-up. Three patients (13%) underwent revision arthrodesis at a mean of 18.9 months postoperatively, and 21 patients (88%) did not require additional surgery as of final follow-up. Patients significantly improved to a mean FAAM-ADL score of 71.5 from 36.3 (P < .001). The mean VAS for pain significantly improved from 77.2 to 32.9 (P < .001). Male sex (P = .08) and a lateral operative approach (P = .03) both resulted in worse outcomes. Conclusion: Use of a femoral head allograft with TTC arthrodesis can offer improved functional scores and sustained radiographic outcomes.Level of Evidence: Level IV: Case series.

Outcomes of Primary Tibiotalocalcaneal Nailing for Complicated Diabetic Ankle Fractures

BACKGROUND

Ankle fractures in patients with complicated diabetes have significantly increased the rates of complications and poorer functional outcomes when treated nonoperatively, and there have been only modest reductions when treated operatively. We hypothesized that the minimally invasive, robust construct that tibiotalocalcaneal fixation with an intramedullary nail offers would result in high rates of limb salvage, acceptable rates of complications, and less loss of function, in this difficult patient population.

METHODS

This was an institutional review board-approved retrospective study of 27 patients with complicated diabetes who underwent tibiotalocalcaneal nailing of their ankle fracture as a primary treatment without formal joint preparation. Patients with complicated diabetes were defined as having neuropathy, nephropathy, and/or peripheral vascular disease. The mean clinical follow-up was 888 days. Patients were screened for associated risk factors. Data were collected on surgical complications. The outcomes measured included length of hospital stay, loss of ambulatory level, amputation, and time to death. The mean age was 66 years with an average body mass index of 38 and hemoglobin A1c of 7.4. Six fractures were open.

RESULTS

The limb salvage rate was 96%. The average hospital stay was 6 days, and the mean time to weightbearing was 6.7 weeks. The fracture union rate was 88%. The surgical complication rate was 18.5%, with no instances of malunions, symptomatic nonunions, or Charcot arthropathy. Eight patients died by final follow-up (mean, 1048 days). An ambulatory level was maintained in 81% of the patients.

CONCLUSION

With high limb salvage rates, relatively early weightbearing, maintained ambulatory level, and acceptable complication rates, we believe our technique can be considered an appropriate approach to increase the overall survivability of threatened limbs and lives in this patient population.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, retrospective case series.

Safe Placement of Intramedullary Nail and Inter-Physician Variability in Guidewire Placement in Retrograde Tibiotalocalcaneal Fusions

Retrograde tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis is a salvage procedure for severe arthrosis and deformity of both the tibiotalar and subtalar joints and requires image-confirmed placement of a retrograde guidewire. The anatomical shape of the calcaneus creates a situation in which guidewire placement can be skewed on imaging based on the angle of either internal or external rotation. As a result, the aims of our study were to (1) determine the optimal angle(s) of rotation required to accurately depict guidewire placement on imaging and (2) evaluate and describe the effects angle of rotation has on physician assessment of guidewire placement. Using a C-arm x-ray, images of cadavers with both correctly and incorrectly placed guidewires were taken at 5° increments of internal and external rotation of the cadaveric lower extremity and assessed for accuracy of guidewire depiction. The images revealed that the correctly placed guidewire appeared displaced medially at angles of 35° and 40° of external rotation. Conversely, the incorrectly placed guidewire appeared to be correctly placed at between 10° and 40° of external rotation. These images were then disseminated to various physicians including orthopedic surgeons and podiatrists to determine the ability of physicians to correctly appreciate guidewire placement. Using the responses from 35 physicians, it was found that certain angles of internal and external rotation preclude physicians from correctly determining guidewire placement. We found, based on chi-square analysis, that we were able to reject our null hypothesis with a p value of <.001 leading to the conclusion that indeed angle of rotation and guidewire placement can lead to false depictions of guidewire placement. In conclusion, our study gave objective measurements to guide foot placement during tibiotalocalcaneal fusion to decrease the risk incorrectly depicted medial guidewire placement and subsequent incorrect intramedullary nail placement.

Rate of Subtalar Joint Arthrodesis After Retrograde Tibiotalocalcaneal Arthrodesis With Intramedullary Nail Fixation: Evaluation of the RAIN Database

BACKGROUND

Hindfoot arthritis or significant deformity involving the ankle and subtalar joint (STJ) is a disabling condition with few salvage options. Many surgeons note a decreased STJ fusion rate compared with ankle union when a retrograde nail construct is used. The purpose of this study was to report the STJ fusion rate of tibiotalocalcaneal (TTC) arthrodesis with retrograde nail.

METHODS

A chart and radiographic review was performed. TTC fusions performed in patients with osteoarthritis, posttraumatic arthritis, or deformity correction with retrograde nail fixation were included. Exclusion criteria included neuropathy, Charcot arthropathy, and failed total ankle replacement.

RESULTS

Ultimately, 66 retrograde TTC fusions (in 63 patients) met inclusion criteria. The average age was 57.0 years. There were 29 female and 34 male patients. Radiographic fusion of the ankle and STJ was demonstrated in 68.2% of the patients. There were 11 cases (16.7%) of ankle arthrodesis with STJ nonunion, 6 cases (9.1%) of STJ fusion but ankle nonunion, and 4 cases (6.1%) of stable radiographic nonunion of both joints. The mean time to subtalar fusion was 112.1 days. One patient required revision surgery and conversion to below-knee amputation. One patient required a CROW walker for assistance with gait.

CONCLUSION

A 22.8% radiographic nonunion rate of the STJ was noted in retrograde TTC fusion. Despite this, patients were stable and pain free.

LEVELS OF EVIDENCE

Level IV: Retrospective Case series.

Role of Extra-articular Tibiotalocalcaneal Arthrodesis and Posterior Approach in Highly Complex Cases

BACKGROUND

Tibiotalocalcaneal (TTC) arthrodesis is a procedure commonly used as salvage surgery for various pathologic processes that compromise the ankle and subtalar joints. It is a reasonably standardized procedure when performed as a primary surgery in advanced stages of TTC arthritis. For such cases, there are several alternative approaches, fixation materials, and bone substitutes that can be used. Most represent valid options with similar results in the literature. However, in highly complex cases requiring TTC arthrodesis, the options for the approach and fixation material can be limited. Understanding the alternative approaches and techniques is of great help to the surgeon when faced with highly complex cases, such as patients with multiple previous operations, lack of bone stock, severe deformities, or compromise of associated soft tissues. In this article, we describe the role of the posterior approach with some technical variation that allows extra-articular arthrodesis in highly complex cases, and we present a series of patients with tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis who were operated on using this technique.

METHODS

Retrospective review of all patients who underwent tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis via posterior approach between 2008 and 2016. The surgeries were performed by 2 different surgeons with the same technique (posterior approach with sliding graft) but 2 different fixation methods. Radiographs and computed tomographic (CT) studies were reviewed and patient satisfaction was rated using the Coughlin scale. Mean follow-up was 38 months. We identified 20 patients. The mean age was 51.2 years; 11 patients had post-traumatic arthritis whereas the others had other causes of arthritis (inflammatory disease, neurologic deformity, etc).

RESULTS

The arthrodesis was performed using a tibiotalocalcaneal plate in 9 patients and retrograde intramedullary nail in 11 patients. Radiographic fusion was observed at an average of 3.1 months. Four patients had complications and 15 reported good or excellent results after surgery.

CONCLUSION

Our study found a fusion rate comparable to other studies in highly complex cases. There were no operative wound complications. We observed that the posterior approach, with an extra-articular fusion procedure, was a valid option for salvage surgery in highly complex cases that require tibiotalocalcaneal fusion.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, retrospective case series.

Comparison of Posterior Approach With Intramedullary Nailing Versus Lateral Transfibular Approach With Fixed-Angle Plating for Tibiotalocalcaneal Arthrodesis

BACKGROUND

A variety of operative approaches and fixation techniques have been described for tibiotalocalcaneal (TTC) arthrodesis. The intramedullary (IM) nail and lateral, fixed-angle plating are commonly used because of ease of use and favorable biomechanical properties. A lateral, transfibular (LTF) approach allows for direct access to the tibiotalar and subtalar joints, but the posterior, Achilles tendon-splitting (PATS) approach offers a robust soft tissue envelope. The purpose of this study was to compare the results of TTC arthrodesis with either a PATS approach with IM nailing or LTF approach with fixed-angle plating.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed on all patients who underwent simultaneous TTC arthrodesis with minimum 1 year clinical and radiographic follow up. Patients were excluded if they underwent TTC arthrodesis through an approach other than PATS or LTF, and received fixation without an IM nail or fixed-angle plate. Primary outcomes examined were union rate, revisions, and complications. Thirty-eight patients underwent TTC arthrodesis with a PATS approach and IM nailing, and 28 with a LTF approach and lateral plating.

RESULTS

The overall union rate was 71%; 76% (29 of 38 patients) for the PATS/IM nail group, and 64% (18 of 28) for LTF/plating group ( P = .41). Symptomatic nonunion requiring revision arthrodesis occurred in 16% (6 of 38) of the PATS/IM nail group versus 7% (2 of 28) in the LTF/lateral plating group ( P = .45). There were no significant differences in individual tibiotalar or subtalar union rates, superficial wound problems, infection, symptomatic hardware, stress fractures, or nerve irritations.

CONCLUSION

Union, revision, and complication rates were similar for TTC arthrodesis performed with a PATS approach and IM nail compared with an LTF approach and fixed-angle plate in a complex patient population. Both techniques were adequate, especially when prior incisions, preexisting hardware, or deformity preclude options.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Outcomes of Tibiotalocalcaneal Arthrodesis Through a Posterior Achilles Tendon-Splitting Approach

BACKGROUND

A number of operative approaches have been described to perform a tibiotalocalcaneal (TTC) arthrodesis. Here we present the largest reported series of a posterior Achilles tendon-splitting approach for TTC fusion.

METHODS

With institutional review board approval, a retrospective review of the TTC fusions performed at a single academic institution was carried out. Orthopedic surgeons specializing in foot and ankle surgery performed all procedures. Eligible patients included all those who underwent a TTC fusion via a posterior approach and had at least a 2-year follow-up. Forty-one patients underwent TTC arthrodesis through a posterior Achilles tendon-splitting approach. Mean age at surgery was 56.9±15.0 years. There were 21 female and 20 male patients. Preoperative diagnoses included arthritis (n = 13 patients), failed total ankle arthroplasty (9), avascular necrosis of the talus (9), prior nonunion of the ankle and/or subtalar joint (6), Charcot neuro-arthropathy (2), and stage IV flatfoot deformity (2). In 37 patients (90.2%), a hindfoot intramedullary arthrodesis nail was used, with posterior plate or supplemental screw augmentation in 17 patients. Posterior plate stabilization alone was utilized in 4 cases (9.8%).

RESULTS

The fusion rate was 80.4%. Eight patients developed a nonunion of the subtalar, tibiotalar, or both joints. Complications were observed in 17 patients (41.4%). Of these, ankle nonunion (19.5%), tibial stress fracture (17%), postoperative cellulitis and superficial wound breakdown (9.7%), subtalar nonunion (4.8%), and TTC malunion (2.4%) were the most frequently identified. One patient eventually underwent amputation (2.4%).

CONCLUSION

We believe that posterior Achilles tendon-splitting approach for tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis was a safe and effective method, with similar union and complications rates to some previously described techniques. We believe the posterior approach is advantageous as it provides simultaneous access to both the ankle and subtalar joints and allows for dissection to occur between angiosomes, which may preserve blood supply to the skin.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, retrospective case series.

Outcomes of Tibiotalocalcaneal Arthrodesis Through a Posterior Achilles Tendon-Splitting Approach

BACKGROUND

A number of operative approaches have been described to perform a tibiotalocalcaneal (TTC) arthrodesis. Here we present the largest reported series of a posterior Achilles tendon-splitting approach for TTC fusion.

METHODS

With institutional review board approval, a retrospective review of the TTC fusions performed at a single academic institution was carried out. Orthopedic surgeons specializing in foot and ankle surgery performed all procedures. Eligible patients included all those who underwent a TTC fusion via a posterior approach and had at least a 2-year follow-up. Forty-one patients underwent TTC arthrodesis through a posterior Achilles tendon-splitting approach. Mean age at surgery was 56.9±15.0 years. There were 21 female and 20 male patients. Preoperative diagnoses included arthritis (n = 13 patients), failed total ankle arthroplasty (9), avascular necrosis of the talus (9), prior nonunion of the ankle and/or subtalar joint (6), Charcot neuro-arthropathy (2), and stage IV flatfoot deformity (2). In 37 patients (90.2%), a hindfoot intramedullary arthrodesis nail was used, with posterior plate or supplemental screw augmentation in 17 patients. Posterior plate stabilization alone was utilized in 4 cases (9.8%).

RESULTS

The fusion rate was 80.4%. Eight patients developed a nonunion of the subtalar, tibiotalar, or both joints. Complications were observed in 17 patients (41.4%). Of these, ankle nonunion (19.5%), tibial stress fracture (17%), postoperative cellulitis and superficial wound breakdown (9.7%), subtalar nonunion (4.8%), and TTC malunion (2.4%) were the most frequently identified. One patient eventually underwent amputation (2.4%).

CONCLUSION

We believe that posterior Achilles tendon-splitting approach for tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis was a safe and effective method, with similar union and complications rates to some previously described techniques. We believe the posterior approach is advantageous as it provides simultaneous access to both the ankle and subtalar joints and allows for dissection to occur between angiosomes, which may preserve blood supply to the skin.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, retrospective case series.

Early Tibiotalocalcaneal Arthrodesis Intramedullary Nail for Treatment of a Complex Tibial Pilon Fracture (AO/OTA 43-C)

Management of severely comminuted, complete articular tibial pilon fractures (AO/OTA 43-C) remains a challenge, with few treatment options providing good clinical outcomes. Open reduction and internal fixation of the tibial plafond, tibiotalar arthrodesis, and salvage hindfoot reconstruction procedures are all associated with surgical complications and functional limitations. In this report, we present a case of a complex pilon fracture in a patient with multiple medical comorbidities and socioeconomic disadvantages that was successfully and acutely treated with a retrograde tibiotalocalcaneal hindfoot arthrodesis nail. At final follow-up examination, the patient had decreased pain, a stable plantigrade foot, and could ambulate with normal shoes without any assistive devices.

LEVELS OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, Level IV: Case series.

Salvage of avascular necrosis of the talus by combined ankle and hindfoot arthrodesis without structural bone graft

BACKGROUND

Osteonecrosis of the talus is a well-recognized pathology, which can result in significant hindfoot collapse resulting in poor function and pain. Treatment with intramedullary tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis (IMTCA) using a retrograde intramedullary nail is widely utilized for severe concomitant tibiotalar and subtalar pathologies. This study reports the results of ankle and hindfoot arthrodesis in patients with arthritis and deformity caused specifically by talar osteonecrosis.

METHODS

Fourteen ankle and hindfoot arthrodeses with retrograde intramedullary nail were studied, with a mean follow-up of 26 months. Medical records were reviewed for operative technique, concomitant procedures, bone graft used, and postoperative complications including nonunion, infection, nerve injury, wound healing issues, and the need for additional surgeries. Clinical outcomes included Visual Analogue Scale for pain, the AOFAS Ankle/Hindfoot Score, and the SF-36 questionnaire.

RESULTS

Over 80% of cases had osteonecrosis involving the entire body of the talus. In 4 cases tibiocalcaneal arthrodesis was performed, with the remaining talar head-neck portion fused to anterior aspect of tibia. Union was achieved in all cases. The mean preoperative VAS score was 6.9 (range 5 to 9, SD ± 1.5) decreasing to 1.7 (range 0 to 6, SD ± 2.2) postoperatively (P = .00008). The mean preoperative AOFAS score was 32.7 (range 20 to 46, SD ± 8.7), increasing to 72.1 (range 46 to 86, SD ± 10.1, P = .00003). The mean preoperative SF-36 physical component score was 30.5 (range 21 to 42, SD ± 6.9) increasing to 42.8 (range 20 to 60, SD ± 11.4) postoperatively (P = .02). Complications included 1 stress fracture, 4 hardware removals, and 1 superficial infection.

CONCLUSION

Ankle and hindfoot arthrosis due to extensive talar AVN can be successfully treated with IMTCA.

Surgical correction of severe deformity of the ankle and hindfoot by arthrodesis using a compressing retrograde intramedullary nail

BACKGROUND

Tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis with a retrograde intramedullary nail is a widely used surgical technique for the treatment of concomitant tibiotalar and subtalar arthritis and correction of accompanying deformity. This study was undertaken to evaluate the union rate, deformity correction, and clinical outcomes achieved using a compressing retrograde intramedullary nail.

METHODS

Thirty tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodeses with an osseous compressing arthrodesis nail system were studied with a mean follow-up of 26 months. Radiographic data were collected on deformity correction and union rate, and clinical outcomes were evaluated using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain, the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) Ankle/Hindfoot Score, and the Short Form-36 (SF-36) health survey. Records were reviewed for complications and concomitant procedures.

RESULTS

Thirteen of 30 operated limbs had a preoperative coronal plane deformity exceeding 15 degrees. Mean magnitude of correction was 13.2 degrees (range, 0-32 degrees, standard deviation ±9.6). In total, 76% of limbs (23/30) had postoperative coronal deformity of less than 5 degrees. Union was achieved in 96.6% of patients. There were 3 cases of tibial stress reaction, 3 cases of transient plantar nerve irritation, and 3 cases of wound infection. Clinical outcomes demonstrated a reduction in mean VAS score from 6.5 to 1.3 (P < .01), an increase in mean AOFAS Ankle/Hindfoot Scores from 29.7 to 74.3 (P < .01), and an increase in mean total SF-36 scores from 85.6 to 98.8 (P < .01).

CONCLUSION

A compressing retrograde intramedullary nail was effective in achieving deformity correction, a high union rate, and improvement in clinical outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, retrospective case series.