1
|
Uher R, Pavlova B, Radua J, Provenzani U, Najafi S, Fortea L, Ortuño M, Nazarova A, Perroud N, Palaniyappan L, Domschke K, Cortese S, Arnold PD, Austin JC, Vanyukov MM, Weissman MM, Young AH, Hillegers MH, Danese A, Nordentoft M, Murray RM, Fusar‐Poli P. Transdiagnostic risk of mental disorders in offspring of affected parents: a meta-analysis of family high-risk and registry studies. World Psychiatry 2023; 22:433-448. [PMID: 37713573 PMCID: PMC10503921 DOI: 10.1002/wps.21147] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/17/2023] Open
Abstract
The offspring of parents with mental disorders are at increased risk for developing mental disorders themselves. The risk to offspring may extend transdiagnostically to disorders other than those present in the parents. The literature on this topic is vast but mixed. To inform targeted prevention and genetic counseling, we performed a comprehensive, PRISMA 2020-compliant meta-analysis. We systematically searched the literature published up to September 2022 to retrieve original family high-risk and registry studies reporting on the risk of mental disorders in offspring of parents with any type of mental disorder. We performed random-effects meta-analyses of the relative risk (risk ratio, RR) and absolute risk (lifetime, up to the age at assessment) of mental disorders, defined according to the ICD or DSM. Cumulative incidence by offspring age was determined using meta-analytic Kaplan-Meier curves. We measured heterogeneity with the I2 statistic, and risk of bias with the Quality In Prognosis Studies (QUIPS) tool. Sensitivity analyses addressed the impact of study design (family high-risk vs. registry) and specific vs. transdiagnostic risks. Transdiagnosticity was appraised with the TRANSD criteria. We identified 211 independent studies that reported data on 3,172,115 offspring of parents with psychotic, bipolar, depressive, disruptive, attention-deficit/hyperactivity, anxiety, substance use, eating, obsessive-compulsive, and borderline personality disorders, and 20,428,575 control offspring. The RR and lifetime risk of developing any mental disorder were 3.0 and 55% in offspring of parents with anxiety disorders; 2.6 and 17% in offspring of those with psychosis; 2.1 and 55% in offspring of those with bipolar disorder; 1.9 and 51% in offspring of those with depressive disorders; and 1.5 and 38% in offspring of those with substance use disorders. The offspring's RR and lifetime risk of developing the same mental disorder diagnosed in their parent were 8.4 and 32% for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder; 5.8 and 8% for psychosis; 5.1 and 5% for bipolar disorder; 2.8 and 9% for substance use disorders; 2.3 and 14% for depressive disorders; 2.3 and 1% for eating disorders; and 2.2 and 31% for anxiety disorders. There were 37 significant transdiagnostic associations between parental mental disorders and the RR of developing a different mental disorder in the offspring. In offspring of parents with psychosis, bipolar and depressive disorder, the risk of the same disorder onset emerged at 16, 5 and 6 years, and cumulated to 3%, 19% and 24% by age 18; and to 8%, 36% and 46% by age 28. Heterogeneity ranged from 0 to 0.98, and 96% of studies were at high risk of bias. Sensitivity analyses restricted to prospective family high-risk studies confirmed the pattern of findings with similar RR, but with greater absolute risks compared to analyses of all study types. This study demonstrates at a global, meta-analytic level that offspring of affected parents have strongly elevated RR and lifetime risk of developing any mental disorder as well as the same mental disorder diagnosed in the parent. The transdiagnostic risks suggest that offspring of parents with a range of mental disorders should be considered as candidates for targeted primary prevention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rudolf Uher
- Dalhousie UniversityDepartment of PsychiatryHalifaxNSCanada
- Nova Scotia Health AuthorityHalifaxNSCanada
| | - Barbara Pavlova
- Dalhousie UniversityDepartment of PsychiatryHalifaxNSCanada
- Nova Scotia Health AuthorityHalifaxNSCanada
| | - Joaquim Radua
- Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), CIBERSAM, Instituto de Salud Carlos IIIUniversity of BarcelonaBarcelonaSpain
| | - Umberto Provenzani
- Department of Brain and Behavioral SciencesUniversity of PaviaPaviaItaly
| | - Sara Najafi
- Dalhousie UniversityDepartment of PsychiatryHalifaxNSCanada
- Nova Scotia Health AuthorityHalifaxNSCanada
| | - Lydia Fortea
- Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), CIBERSAM, Instituto de Salud Carlos IIIUniversity of BarcelonaBarcelonaSpain
| | - Maria Ortuño
- Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), CIBERSAM, Instituto de Salud Carlos IIIUniversity of BarcelonaBarcelonaSpain
| | - Anna Nazarova
- Dalhousie UniversityDepartment of PsychiatryHalifaxNSCanada
- Nova Scotia Health AuthorityHalifaxNSCanada
| | - Nader Perroud
- Service of Psychiatric Specialties, Department of PsychiatryUniversity Hospitals of GenevaGenevaSwitzerland
- Department of PsychiatryUniversity of GenevaGenevaSwitzerland
| | - Lena Palaniyappan
- Douglas Mental Health University Institute, Department of PsychiatryMcGill UniversityMontrealQBCanada
- Robarts Research InstituteWestern UniversityLondonONCanada
- Department of Medical BiophysicsWestern UniversityLondonONCanada
| | - Katharina Domschke
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical Center, Faculty of MedicineUniversity of FreiburgFreiburgGermany
| | - Samuele Cortese
- School of Psychology, and Clinical and Experimental Sciences (CNS and Psychiatry), Faculty of MedicineUniversity of SouthamptonSouthamptonUK
- Solent NHS TrustSouthamptonUK
- Division of Psychiatry and Applied PsychologyUniversity of NottinghamNottinghamUK
- Hassenfeld Children's Hospital at NYU LangoneNew YorkNYUSA
| | - Paul D. Arnold
- Mathison Centre for Mental Health Research & EducationUniversity of CalgaryCalgaryALCanada
| | - Jehannine C. Austin
- Departments of Psychiatry and Medical GeneticsUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverBCCanada
| | - Michael M. Vanyukov
- Departments of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Psychiatry, and Human GeneticsUniversity of PittsburghPittsburghPAUSA
| | - Myrna M. Weissman
- Department of Psychiatry, Vagelos College of Physicians and SurgeonsColumbia UniversityNew YorkNYUSA
- Division of Translational EpidemiologyNew York State Psychiatric InstituteNew YorkNYUSA
- Mailman School of Public HealthColumbia UniversityNew YorkNYUSA
| | - Allan H. Young
- Centre for Affective Disorders, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and NeuroscienceKing's College LondonLondonUK
| | - Manon H.J. Hillegers
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry/PsychologyErasmus University Medical Center, Sophia Children's HospitalRotterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Andrea Danese
- Social, Genetic and Developmental Psychiatry Centre and Department of Child and Adolescent PsychiatryInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College LondonLondonUK
- National and Specialist CAMHS Clinic for Trauma, Anxiety, and DepressionSouth London and Maudsley NHS Foundation TrustLondonUK
| | - Merete Nordentoft
- Copenhagen Research Center for Mental Health, Mental Health ServicesCapital Region of DenmarkCopenhagenDenmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health SciencesUniversity of CopenhagenCopenhagenDenmark
| | - Robin M. Murray
- Department of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and NeuroscienceKing's College LondonLondonUK
| | - Paolo Fusar‐Poli
- Department of Brain and Behavioral SciencesUniversity of PaviaPaviaItaly
- Early Psychosis: Intervention and Clinical‐detection (EPIC) lab, Department of Psychosis StudiesKing's College LondonLondonUK
- Outreach and Support in South‐London (OASIS) NHS Foundation Trust, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation TrustLondonUK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Weigard A, Sripada C. Task-general efficiency of evidence accumulation as a computationally-defined neurocognitive trait: Implications for clinical neuroscience. Biol Psychiatry Glob Open Sci 2022; 1:5-15. [PMID: 35317408 DOI: 10.1016/j.bpsgos.2021.02.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Quantifying individual differences in higher-order cognitive functions is a foundational area of cognitive science that also has profound implications for research on psychopathology. For the last two decades, the dominant approach in these fields has been to attempt to fractionate higher-order functions into hypothesized components (e.g., "inhibition", "updating") through a combination of experimental manipulation and factor analysis. However, the putative constructs obtained through this paradigm have recently been met with substantial criticism on both theoretical and empirical grounds. Concurrently, an alternative approach has emerged focusing on parameters of formal computational models of cognition that have been developed in mathematical psychology. These models posit biologically plausible and experimentally validated explanations of the data-generating process for cognitive tasks, allowing them to be used to measure the latent mechanisms that underlie performance. One of the primary insights provided by recent applications of such models is that individual and clinical differences in performance on a wide variety of cognitive tasks, ranging from simple choice tasks to complex executive paradigms, are largely driven by efficiency of evidence accumulation (EEA), a computational mechanism defined by sequential sampling models. This review assembles evidence for the hypothesis that EEA is a central individual difference dimension that explains neurocognitive deficits in multiple clinical disorders and identifies ways in which in this insight can advance clinical neuroscience research. We propose that recognition of EEA as a major driver of neurocognitive differences will allow the field to make clearer inferences about cognitive abnormalities in psychopathology and their links to neurobiology.
Collapse
|