Features of tumor texture influence surgery and outcome in intracranial meningioma

Background

Texture-related factors such as consistency, vascularity, and adherence vary considerably in meningioma and are thought to be linked with surgical resectability and morbidity. However, data analyzing the true impact of meningioma texture on the surgical management is sparse.

Methods

Patients with intracranial meningioma treated between 08/2014 and 04/2018 at our institution were prospectively collected for demographics, clinical presentation, histology, and surgical treatment with related morbidity and extend of resection. Tumor characteristics were reported by the surgeon using a standardized questionnaire including items such as tumor consistency, homogeneity, vascularization, and adherence to surrounding neurovascular structure and analyzed for their impact surgical outcome parameters using univariate and logistic regression analyses.

Results

Tumor texture-related parameters of 300 patients (72.3% female) with meningioma were analyzed. Meningioma localizations were grouped into 3 different cohorts namely convexity, skull base, and posterior. Postoperative occurrence of a neurological deficit (transient 23.0%; permanent 6.1%) was associated with the duration of surgery (P = .001), size of tumor (P = .046), tumor vascularization (P = .015), and adherence to neurovascular structures (P = .002). Coherently, the duration of surgery (mean 230.99 ± 101.33 min) was associated with size of tumor (P < .0001), vascularization (P < .0001), and adherence (P < .0001). Similar associations were recapitulated in subgroup analyses of different tumor localizations. Noteworthy, tumor rigidity had no significant impact on time of surgery and neurological outcome.

Conclusions

Our analysis demonstrates that tumor texture has an impact on the surgical management of meningioma and provides data that tumor vascularization and adherence are significant factors influencing surgical outcome whereas the influence of tumor consistency has less impact than previously thought.

Impact of Image Reconstruction Settings on Texture Features in 18F-FDG PET

Evaluation of tumor heterogeneity based on texture parameters has recently attracted much interest in the PET imaging community. However, the impact of reconstruction settings on texture parameters is unclear, especially relating to time-of-flight and point-spread function modeling. Their effects on 55 texture features (TFs) and 6 features based on first-order statistics (FOS) were investigated. Standardized uptake value (SUV) measures were also evaluated as peak SUV (SUVpeak), maximum SUV, and mean SUV (SUVmean).

METHODS

This study retrospectively recruited 20 patients with lesions in the lung who underwent whole-body (18)F-FDG PET/CT. The coefficient of variation (COV) of each feature across different reconstructions was calculated.

RESULTS

SUVpeak, SUVmean, 18 TFs, and 1 FOS were the most robust (COV ≤ 5%) whereas skewness, cluster shade, and zone percentage were the least robust (COV > 20%) with respect to reconstruction algorithms using default settings. Heterogeneity parameters had different sensitivities to iteration number. Twenty-four parameters including SUVpeak and SUVmean exhibited variation with a COV less than 5%; 28 parameters, including maximum SUV, showed variation with a COV in the range of 5%-10%. In addition, skewness, cluster shade, and zone percentage were the most sensitive to iteration number. In terms of sensitivity to full width at half maximum (FWHM), 15 TFs and 1 FOS had the best performance with a COV less than 5%, whereas SUVpeak and SUVmean had a COV between 5% and 10%. Grid size had the largest impact on image features, which was demonstrated by only 11 features, including SUVpeak and SUVmean, having a COV less than 10%.

CONCLUSION

Different image features have different sensitivities to reconstruction settings. Iteration number and FWHM of the gaussian filter have a similar impact on the image features. Grid size has a larger impact on the features than iteration number and FWHM. The features that exhibited large variations such as skewness in FOS, cluster shade, and zone percentage should be used with caution. The entropy in FOS, difference entropy, inverse difference normalized, inverse difference moment normalized, low gray-level run emphasis, high gray-level run emphasis, and low gray-level zone emphasis are the most robust features.