Disordered eating is not associated with musculoskeletal injury in university athletes

TAKE HOME MESSAGE

Musculoskeletal injuries and disordered eating are prevalent in varsity-level athletes but are not associated in our participants.

Translating Results from VARSITY to Real World: Adalimumab vs Vedolizumab as First-line Biological in Moderate to Severe IBD

BACKGROUND

Selecting a first-line therapy remains challenging in IBD. Adalimumab (ADM) and vedolizumab (VDZ) effectively lead to endoscopic remission in moderate to severe IBD. The VARSITY trial showed superiority of VDZ over ADM in ulcerative colitis (UC) regarding clinical remission and endoscopic improvement at week 52. We explored these results in a real-world setting of UC and Crohn's disease (CD).

METHODS

This retrospective study followed a cohort of biologic-naïve patients starting ADM or VDZ from 2015-2019. Patients had moderate to severe disease (endoscopic Mayo score ≥2 for UC, presence of ulcerations for CD) prior to therapy initiation. For UC, endoscopic remission (endoscopic Mayo score 0) and improvement (endoscopic Mayo score ≤1) at week 52 were assessed. For CD, endoscopic remission (absence of ulcerations) and improvement (markedly better endoscopy despite ulcerations) at weeks 26-52 were studied. Treatment persistence was also evaluated.

RESULTS

In total, 195 biologic-naïve patients (109 UC; 86 CD) were included. In UC, VDZ was superior to ADM regarding endoscopic remission (29% vs 11%, P = .03), endoscopic improvement (51% vs 26%, P = .01) at week 52, and treatment persistence (P = .04). In CD, no differences in endoscopic remission (VDZ 48% vs ADM 60%; P=0.37), improvement (VDZ 76% vs ADM 77%; P = 1.00), or treatment persistence (P=0.43) at weeks 26-52 were seen. Safety profiles were similar in UC and CD.

CONCLUSIONS

This real-world cohort study of biologic-naïve IBD patients found VDZ to be superior to ADM as first-line treatment for patients with UC-but not CD-regarding endoscopic remission at week 52 and treatment persistence.

Now that They're Out: Experiences of College Athletics Teams with Openly LGBTQ Players

In recent years, more college athletes have publicly identified as lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and/or queer (LGBTQ). Our study seeks to move past media celebrations and controversies of "coming out" and examine actual experiences of LGBTQ athletes and their teammates. A survey of 259 LGBTQ athletes and teammates of LGBTQ athletes was conducted. We examined concerns about being or playing with LGBTQ athletes, sources of homophobic language, experiences and observations of discrimination, and perceived impact of being or playing with an LGBTQ athlete. Findings indicate that many fears associated with college athletes coming out are likely overstated. All participants reported low levels of concern, homophobia, and negative impact of being or playing with an LGBTQ teammate. However, there were some differences between LGBTQ and non-LGBTQ athletes with non-LGBTQ athletes reporting fewer concerns, but also hearing less homophobic language than their LGBTQ counterparts. programs.

Smartphones and Varsity Athletes: A Complicated Relationship

Varsity athletes are a group of high performers situated within a demographic notable for smartphone usage and media-multitasking. Surprisingly, little research has examined the impact of smartphones in the lives of varsity athletes. The purpose of this exploratory, qualitative study was to begin addressing this gap by investigating varsity athletes' experiences with smartphones. Varsity athletes (n = 21) from nine different sports participated in one of five focus groups, and data emerging from these discussions were subjected to an inductive thematic analysis. Results indicate that smartphones are a mainstay of varsity athletes' experiences, as the athletes regularly use their smartphones to manage roles and demands across multiple contexts (e.g., sport, school, home). Themes pertained to concurrent negative (e.g., stress, distraction, disengagement) and positive (e.g., self-regulation, social connectedness) implications of smartphone usage, making it clear that athletes' relationship with their smartphone is a complicated one. Findings contribute to the limited studies of smartphone usage among athletes, and support the notion that implications of usage exist along a continuum, rather than in distinct categories of "good" and "bad". Results can inform practical guidelines for optimising athletes' use of smartphones in and around the sport context.