The Efficacy and Safety of Intravenous Colistin Plus Aerosolized Colistin Versus Intravenous Colistin Alone in Critically Ill Trauma Patients With Multi-Drug Resistant Gram-Negative Bacilli Infection

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) with potential multiple drug resistance (MDR) have emerged as a major group of organisms causing ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). Higher concentrations are deposited directly in the lungs when antibiotics are given via inhalation, minimizing systemic side effects. This study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of intravenous plus aerosolized colistin versus intravenous (IV) colistin alone in critically ill trauma patients who reported MDR-GNB infection on endotracheal aspirate culture.

METHODS

A hundred patients were recruited in the Intensive Care Unit, Trauma Centre, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, and randomly assigned to the control (n=50) group, which received IV colistin plus aerosolized colistin and the intervention group (n = 50), which received IV colistin alone. Changes in total leucocyte count (TLC), renal function test (RFT), endotracheal aspirate culture, 24-hour urine output, length of ICU stay, and 28-day ICU mortality were investigated.

RESULTS

Patients receiving intravenous plus nebulized colistin therapy had a better outcome compared to IV colistin alone in terms of faster eradication of MDR-GNB infection. A rise in serum urea and creatinine levels was seen in both groups, which were significantly higher, along with a decrease in urine output in the group receiving intravenous colistin alone. No significant difference was observed in serum sodium and potassium levels in the RFT protocol, length of ICU stay, or 28-day ICU mortality.

CONCLUSION

Intravenous nebulized colistin could be considered a better alternative therapy for VAP caused by multi-drug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria in the ICU in terms of faster microbiological cure and lesser nephrotoxicity.