New endoscopic tools in inflammatory bowel disease

Endoscopic remission is now considered the ultimate long-term goal for treating inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Recent advances in endoscopic techniques have progressively added new tools to the armamentarium of endoscopists for a deeper assessment and characterisation of the intestinal mucosa. Virtual Electronic chromoendoscopy is widely available in the endoscopic units, leading to a more accurate evaluation of the vascular and mucosal architecture of the colon, reducing the gap with histology, which is considered a favourable long-term measure. In addition, advanced, sophisticated techniques such as endocytoscope and confocal laser endomicroscopy provide insights into individualised and personalised IBD therapy. Finally, high expectations are placed on the advent of Artificial Intelligence (AI) with promising applications that have the potential to revolutionise IBD diagnosis and management. Here, we discuss state-of-the-art of endoscopic techniques and their applicability to accurate assess endoscopic and histological remission, predict response to therapy and detect, characterise and guide treatment of colonic dysplastic lesions. We are seeing the dawn of a new era wherein the applications of these new endoscopic tools, hand in hand with AI, offer the most incredible opportunity to deliver precision medicine to patients with IBD.

External validation of the Paddington International Virtual Electronic ChromoendoScopy ScOre as a good endoscopic score to define mucosal healing and predict long-term clinical outcomes in ulcerative colitis

OBJECTIVES

To define endoscopic and histological remission in ulcerative colitis (UC) accurately, several scoring systems have been established. A novel virtual electronic chromoendoscopy score, the Paddington International Virtual ChromoendoScopy ScOre (PICaSSO), was developed, validated, and reproduced to assess inflammation grade and predict patient prognosis. We externally verified and validated the clinical value of PICaSSO in UC patients.

METHODS

This prospective study enrolled 63 UC patients. The Mayo endoscopic score (MES), UC Endoscopic Index of Severity (UCEIS), and PICaSSO were adopted for endoscopic evaluation. All biopsy samples were scored using the Robarts histological index (RHI), Nancy histological index (NHI), and "Extent, Chronicity, Activity, Plus additional findings" (ECAP) score. Patients with an endoscopic MES of 0-1 at baseline were followed up during a median time of 23.5 months.

RESULTS

PICaSSO was strongly correlated with other endoscopic and histological scoring systems. PICaSSO ≤3 had advantages in assessing histological remission (HR), with the highest accuracy of 88.9% for ECAP-HR. Relapse-free survival rates were significantly different between patients with MES 0 and MES 1 and patients with PICaSSO ≤3 and >3 (P = 0.010 and 0.018, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

PICaSSO was externally validated with strong correlations with other endoscopic and histological scoring systems in UC, and PICaSSO-ER might potentially predict a better long-term clinical outcome in UC patients.