Atrial premature complexes and heart rate have prognostic significance in 1-month atrial fibrillation recurrence after electrical cardioversion

AIMS

The aim of this study was to investigate the significance of simple 24-h Holter (24H) data after electrical cardioversion (CV) for atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence.

METHODS

We prospectively studied 47 consecutive patients subjected to CV, who successfully converted to sinus rhythm. All underwent echocardiography and 24H after CV. AF recurrence was studied at 14 days and 1 month by second 24H or by interim report of AF.

RESULTS

About 53.2% remained in sinus rhythm (group I) and the rest recurred to AF (group II). Group I had fewer atrial premature complexes per hour (APC/h) (P = 0.002) and lower maximum (max HR), average, and minimum heart rates compared with group II (all Ps < 0.05). The optimal value of APC/h and max HR with best sensitivity and specificity was 32 APC/h and 90 bpm, respectively. These findings were the predictors of AF recurrence [hazard ratio (HR) = 4.5 with 95% CI = 1.7-11.7 and HR = 4.3 with 95% CI = 1.7-10.9, respectively]. Patients with the combination of both predictors had greater HR of AF recurrence compared with those with < 32 APC/h and max HR < 90 bpm (HR = 8.8 with 95% CI = 2.5-31.4).

CONCLUSION

Patients with frequent APC/h and high max HR are at high risk for 1-month AF recurrence after electrical CV.

Identification of “substrate fibrillators” and “trigger fibrillators” by pacemaker diagnostics

BACKGROUND

The population of patients likely to respond to selected pacing algorithms for maintenance of sinus rhythm is unknown.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to identify patients with specific onset patterns of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF).

METHODS

Dual-chamber pacemakers with advanced diagnostic functions were implanted in 112 patients with conventional indications for antibradycardia pacing and a history of paroxysmal AF. Pacemaker diagnostic data were analyzed after 97.5 +/- 40.9 days. According to the frequency of premature atrial contractions (PACs) during the 5 minutes before AF onset, patients were assigned to one of three groups: group A (high PAC activity), group B (moderate PAC activity), or group C (low PAC activity).

RESULTS

AF burden was lower in group A (4.6% +/- 2.4%) than group B (15.8% +/- 3.0%, P = .003) and group C (15.5% +/- 3.1%, P = .003). Fewer AF episodes occurred in group A (2.1 +/- 1.3 per day) than group B (3.8 +/- 1.2 per day, P = .006). Mean AF episode duration was shorter in group A (11.4 +/- 10.2 hours) than group C (41.4 +/- 27.5 hours, P = .03).

CONCLUSION

The coincidence of low PAC activity before AF onset, high AF burden, and extended arrhythmia episode duration appears to be the consequence of a high atrial substrate factor. In these "substrate fibrillators," the efficacy of pacing algorithms for maintenance of sinus rhythm may be limited. In contrast, "trigger fibrillators" exhibiting low AF burden despite high PAC incidence may represent the target population for specific PAC-suppressing pacing algorithms.