Incidence of metachronous cancer after endoscopic submucosal dissection: a comparison between undifferentiated-type and differentiated-type early gastric cancer

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has become an important and minimally invasive treatment for early gastric cancer (EGC) with a negligible risk of metastasis not only for differentiated-type (D-type) cancer but also for undifferentiated-type (UD-type) cancer. We aimed to investigate the incidence and characteristics of metachronous cancer after ESD for UD-type cancer, which has not yet been elucidated.

METHODS

In total, 175 patients who underwent ESD for UD-type EGC were enrolled. For comparison, 350 patients who underwent ESD for D-type EGC during the same period were randomly selected. These patients underwent a follow-up EGD annually. The median observation period was 6.0 years and 5.4 years, respectively.

RESULTS

The annual incidence of metachronous cancer after ESD for UD-type and D-type cancer was .9% and 5.3%, respectively. Among the patients who underwent ESD for UD-type cancer, 30.9% of patients were uninfected with Helicobacter pylori, whereas all patients who underwent ESD for D-type cancer were infected with H pylori. All patients who developed metachronous cancer were infected with H pylori. UD-type metachronous cancer developed more frequently in patients after ESD for UD-type cancer than after ESD for D-type cancer, and the curative resection rate of ESD was significantly lower in these cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Metachronous cancers developed only in H pylori-infected patients in this cohort. Although metachronous cancer incidence was significantly less frequent in patients after ESD for UD-type cancer, the curative resection rate of ESD was significantly lower. Routine surveillance should be conducted more carefully after ESD for UD-type cancer, especially in H pylori-infected patients.

Clinicopathological features of early gastric cancers arising in Helicobacter pylori uninfected patients

BACKGROUND

Persistent Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection causes chronic inflammation, atrophy of the gastric mucosa, and a high risk of developing gastric cancer. In recent years, awareness of eradication therapy has increased in Japan. As H. pylori infections decrease, the proportion of gastric cancers arising from H. pylori uninfected gastric mucosa will increase. The emergence of gastric cancer arising in H. pylori uninfected patients though rarely reported, is a concern to be addressed and needs elucidation of its clinicopathological features.

AIM

To evaluate the clinicopathological features of early gastric cancer in H. pylori-uninfected patients.

METHODS

A total of 2462 patients with 3375 instances of early gastric cancers that were treated by endoscopic submucosal dissection were enrolled in our study between May 2000 and September 2019. Of these, 30 lesions in 30 patients were diagnosed as H. pylori-uninfected gastric cancer (HpUIGC). We defined a patient as H. pylori-uninfected using the following three criteria: (1) The patient did not receive treatment for H. pylori, which was determined by investigating medical records and conducting patient interviews; (2) Lack of endoscopic atrophy; and (3) The patient was negative for H. pylori after being tested at least twice using various diagnostic methods, including serum anti-H. pylori-IgG antibody, urease breath test, rapid urease test, and microscopic examination.

RESULTS

The frequency of HpUIGC was 1.2% (30/2462) for the patients in our study. The study included 19 males and 11 females with a mean age of 59 years. The location of the stomach lesions was divided into three sections; upper third (U), middle third (M), lower third (L). Of the 30 lesions, 15 were U, 1 was M, and 14 were L. Morphologically, 17 lesions were protruded and flat elevated type (0-I, 0-IIa, 0-IIa + IIc), and 13 lesions were flat and depressed type (0-IIb, 0-IIc). The median tumor diameter was 8 mm (range 2-98 mm). Histological analysis revealed that 22 lesions (73.3%) were differentiated type.The HpUIGC lesions were classified into fundic gland type adenocarcinoma (7 cases), foveolar type well-differentiated adenocarcinoma (8 cases), intestinal phenotype adenocarcinoma (7 cases), and pure signet-ring cell carcinoma (8 cases). Among 30 HpUIGCs, 24 lesions (80%) were limited to the mucosa; wherein, the remaining 6 lesions showed submucosal invasion. One of the submucosal invasive lesions showed more than 500 μm invasion. The mucin phenotype analysis identified 7 HpUIGC with intestinal phenotype and 23 with gastric phenotype.

CONCLUSION

We elucidated the clinicopathological characteristics of HpUIGC, revealing recognition not only undifferentiated-type but also differentiated-type. In addition, intestinal phenotype tumors were also observed and could be an important tip.

Trends in EMR for nonmalignant colorectal polyps in the United States

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Although most large nonpedunculated colorectal lesions can be safely and efficaciously removed using EMR, the use of colectomy for benign colorectal lesions appears to be increasing. The reason(s) is unclear. We aimed to determine the use and adverse events of EMR in the United States.

METHODS

We used Optum's de-identified Clinformatics Data Mart Database (2003-2016), a database from a large national insurance provider, to identify all colonoscopies performed with either EMR or simple polypectomy on adult patients from January 1, 2011 to December 31, 2015. We measured time trends, regional variation, and adverse event rates. We assessed risk factors for adverse events using multivariate logistic regression.

RESULTS

The rate of EMR use in the US increased from 1.62% of all colonoscopies in 2011 to 2.48% of colonoscopies in 2015 (P < .001). There were, however, significant regional differences in the use of EMRs, from 2.4% of colonoscopies in the western United States to 2.0% of colonoscopies in the southern United States. Between 2011 and 2015, we found stable rates of perforation, GI bleeding (GIB), infections, and cardiac adverse events and decreasing rates of admissions after EMR. In our multivariate model, EMR was an independent risk factor for adverse events, albeit the rates of adverse events were low (1.35% GIB, .22% perforation).

CONCLUSIONS

Use of EMR is rising in the United States, although there is significant regional variation. The rates of adverse events after EMR and polypectomies were low and stable, confirming the continued safety of EMR procedures. A better understanding of the regional barriers and facilitators may improve the use of EMR as the standard management for benign colorectal lesions throughout the United States.

Additional laparoscopic gastrectomy after noncurative endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer: A single-center experience

BACKGROUND

The necessity of additional gastrectomy for early gastric cancer (EGC) patients who do not meet curative criteria after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is controversial.

AIM

To examine the clinicopathologic characteristics of patients who underwent additional laparoscopic gastrectomy after ESD and to determine the appropriate strategy for treating those after noncurative ESD.

METHODS

We retrospectively studied 45 patients with EGC who underwent additional laparoscopic gastrectomy after noncurative ESD from January 2013 to January 2019 at the Cancer Hospital of the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences. We analyzed the patients’ clinicopathological data and identified the predictors of residual cancer (RC) and lymph node metastasis (LNM).

RESULTS

Surgical specimens showed RC in ten (22.2%) patients and LNM in five (11.1%). Multivariate analysis revealed that positive horizontal margin [odds ratio (OR) = 13.393, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.435-125, P = 0.023] and neural invasion (OR = 14.714, 95%CI: 1.087-199, P = 0.043) were independent risk factors for RC. Undifferentiated type was an independent risk factor for LNM (OR = 12.000, 95%CI: 1.197-120, P = 0.035). Tumors in all patients with LNM showed submucosal invasion more than 500 µm. Postoperative complications after additional laparoscopic gastrectomy occurred in five (11.1%) patients, and no deaths occurred among patients with complications.

CONCLUSION

Gastrectomy is necessary not only for patients who have a positive margin after ESD, but also for cases with neural invasion, undifferentiated type, and submucosal invasion more than 500 µm. Laparoscopic gastrectomy is a safe, minimally invasive, and feasible procedure for additional surgery after noncurative ESD. However, further studies are needed to apply these results to clinical practice.

Safety and effectiveness of endoscopic mucosal resection or endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric neoplasia within 2 days' hospital stay

Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) have been well-established methods of treating upper gastrointestinal neoplasia. The aim of this study was to identify the safety and effectiveness of endoscopic treatment for gastric neoplasia within a 2-day hospital stay.Between 2004 and 2015, a total of 914 patients with gastric neoplasia were treated with EMR or ESD within 2 days of hospitalization. The neoplasia sites, en bloc resection rates, pathology, local residual neoplasia rates, and major complications were evaluated retrospectively.The mean age was 63.4 years old, and 636 (69.6%) patients were male. Adenoma was the most common final diagnosis (60.9%), followed by adenocarcinoma (28.9%). The first follow-up endoscopy was performed 4.9 ± 1.1 months after the procedure, and an average of 4.4 endoscopic examinations were performed for 7.16 years (range, 2.1 to 10.2 years). Additional surgery was performed in 11 (1.2%) cases based on post-procedure pathology results. On follow-up endoscopy, a mean of 5.9 months after the procedure, there were 18 residual neoplasia cases (EMR = 13, ESD = 5). Only 4 (0.4%) patients returned to the emergency unit with delayed bleeding, but all 4 cases were successfully controlled with endoscopic treatment. There were no other complications such as delayed perforation or aspiration pneumonia during the 2 days in hospital.EMR and ESD within only 2 days in hospital showed safe and effective outcomes in terms of managing early gastric neoplasia with low complication and local residual rates.

Construction of a preoperative scoring system to predict the difficulty level of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection

Background

We attempted to examine the factors contributing to the difficulty in performance of colorectal ESD, with the aim of constructing a scoring system that could help in prediction of the difficulty level of the procedure.

Methods and materials

The data were analyzed from two viewpoints: to determine the factors contributing to 1) non-en bloc resection and the factors contributing to 2) a slow resection speed. Factors falling under these two categories contributing to difficulty in performance of ESD were extracted and used to construct a scoring system. The validity of this scoring system was evaluated by calculating the correlation between the score and the resection speed in a different dataset.

Results

Based on the results of our analysis, we assigned scores for various factors as follows: 4 points for EMR of a scarred lesion, 1 point for tumors with a diameter of ≥ 30 mm, 2 points for lesions located in the liver/splenic flexure, 1 point for lesions located in the transverse colon, 3 points for LST-NG-PD/depressed lesions, 1 point for protruded lesions and LST-NG-F lesions (range 0–10). In the validation study, the rank correlation coefficient between the score according to the scoring system and the resection speed was -0.130, representing a weak and negative correlation (P = 0.03). We defined the difficulty level depending on the sum of the scores: 0–2, low difficulty level; 3–5, intermediate difficulty level; ≥ 6, high difficulty level. The average resection speed was 12.6 mm²/min in the group with scores of 0–2, 8.1 mm²/min in the group with scores of 3–5, and 5.5 mm²/min in the group with scores of ≥ 6 (11.2 mm²/min in all lesions).

Conclusion

Our colorectal ESD scoring system would be useful for selection of operators with the appropriate skill level in the procedure for colorectal ESD cases.

Risk factors for local recurrence and appropriate surveillance interval after endoscopic resection

BACKGROUND

Risk factors for local recurrence after polypectomy, endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) have not been identified. Additionally, the appropriate interval for endoscopic surveillance of colorectal tumors at high-risk of local recurrence has not been established.

AIM

To clarify the clinicopathological characteristics of recurrent lesions after endoscopic colorectal tumor resection and determine the appropriate interval.

METHODS

Three hundred and sixty patients (1412 colorectal tumors) who underwent polypectomy, EMR, or ESD and received endoscopic surveillance subsequently for more than one year to detect local recurrence were enrolled in this study. The clinicopathological factors associated with local recurrence were determined via univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

Local recurrence was observed in 31 of 360 (8.6%) patients [31 of 1412 (2.2%) lesions] after colorectal tumor resection. Piecemeal resection, tumor size of more than 2 cm, and the presence of villous components were associated with colorectal tumor recurrence after endoscopic resection. Of these three factors, the piecemeal resection procedure was identified as an independent risk factor for recurrence. Colorectal tumors resected into more than five pieces were associated with a high risk of recurrence since the average period from resection to recurrence in these cases was approximately 3 mo. The period to recurrence in cases resected into more than 5 pieces was much shorter than that in those resected into less than 4 pieces (3.8 ± 1.9 mo vs 7.9 ± 5.0 mo, P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Local recurrence of endoscopically treated colorectal tumors depends upon the outcome of first endoscopic procedure. Piecemeal resection was the only significant risk factor associated with local recurrence after endoscopic resection.

Endoscopic ultrasound staging for early esophageal cancer: Are we denying patients neoadjuvant chemo-radiation?

AIM

To evaluate the accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) in early esophageal cancer (EC) performed in a high-volume tertiary cancer center.

METHODS

A retrospective review of patients undergoing esophagectomy was performed and patients with cT1N0 and cT2N0 esophageal cancer by EUS were evaluated. Patient demographics, tumor characteristics, and treatment were reviewed. EUS staging was compared to surgical pathology to determine accuracy of EUS. Descriptive statistics was used to describe the cohort. Student’s t test and Fisher’s exact test or χ² test was used to compare variables. Logistic regression analysis was used to determine if clinical variables such as tumor location and tumor histology were associated with EUS accuracy.

RESULTS

Between 2000 and 2015, 139 patients with clinical stageIorIIA esophageal cancer undergoing esophagectomy were identified. There were 25 (18%) female and 114 (82%) male patients. The tumor location included the middle third of the esophagus in 11 (8%) and lower third and gastroesophageal junction in 128 (92%) patients. Ninety-three percent of patients had adenocarcinoma. Preoperative EUS matched the final surgical pathology in 73/139 patients for a concordance rate of 53%. Twenty-nine patients (21%) were under-staged by EUS; of those, 19 (14%) had unrecognized nodal disease. Positron emission tomography (PET) was used in addition to EUS for clinical staging in 62/139 patients. Occult nodal disease was only found in 4 of 62 patients (6%) in whom both EUS and PET were negative for nodal involvement.

CONCLUSION

EUS is less accurate in early EC and endoscopic mucosal resection might be useful in certain settings. The addition of PET to EUS improves staging accuracy.

[Incidence and treatment of complications observed after endoscopic mucosal resection of superficial digestive tumours in a regional general hospital]

Superficial digestive tumours resection by endoscopic mucosal resection and sub-mucosal dissection causes very few complications according to the results obtained in expert centers. This work reports the rate of complications observed in a regional hospital, also comparing the results of their therapeutic management. The first 100 patients treated by endoscopic mucosal resection and sub-mucosal dissection, conducted by conventional techniques, were studied. The usual complications (stenosis, bleeding, perforation) were identified and details of their treatment reported. The overall complication rate was 16 %. Symptomatic stenoses are observed in 4 % of patients. Secondary bleeding occurs in 5 % of cases. Endoscopic management of these complications is effective in all cases, when it is attempted. Perforations complicate 7 % of the procedures. Two patients were assigned to surgery, successfully, the other 5 patients were treated by endoscopic sutures without damage. The complication rates observed in our department are comparable with results reported by the reference western centers. Their endoscopic management is usually successful and rescue surgery is unfrequent.