Mucocutaneous leishmaniasis: a clinicopathologic classification

BACKGROUND

Leishmaniasis, a chronic parasitic disease transmitted by Phlebotomus sandflies, affects millions of patients. Mucocutaneous leishmaniasis caused by Leishmania brasiliensis is endemic in much of South America.

OBJECTIVE

Our purpose was to develop a system for staging mucocutaneous leishmaniasis on the basis of clinical, histopathologic, epidemiologic, and immunologic criteria.

METHODS

Seventy-five Bolivian patients with mucocutaneous leishmaniasis were evaluated by history and physical examination; cutaneous, mucosal, and bone marrow biopsy specimens; and immunologic assessment.

RESULTS

Mucocutaneous leishmaniasis may progress through three clinical stages: (1) the primary or cutaneous, (2) the cicatricial, and (3) the secondary or mucocutaneous stages. The primary stage can be further subdivided into three phases: lymphoplasmocytic, tuberculoid, and diffuse cutaneous phases. The secondary stage can also be subdivided into three phases: edematous, granulomatous proliferative, and granulomatous necrotizing stages.

CONCLUSION

A classification or staging system enhances the ability to evaluate patients with mucocutaneous leishmaniasis and determine more accurately their prognosis and treatment.

Evaluation of the histopathological classifications of American cutaneous and mucocutaneous leishmaniasis

In order to evaluate the reliability of histopathological classifications of cutaneous and mucocutaneous leishmaniasis the authors compared the histopathological patterns of two biopsies taken simultaneously from the same patient, and classified the material according to Ridley et al. (1980), to Magalhães et al. (1986a), and to a more simplified classification with only three patterns. Distinct histopathological aspects were observed in different lesions or even in the same lesion. The authors concluded that histopathological patterns do not represent a stage of tegumentary leishmaniasis, thus they can not be correlated with prognosis and therapeutical response as suggested in the literature.

A histological classification of mucocutaneous leishmaniasis in Brazil and its clinical evaluation

Biopsies of skin and mucosal lesions were made on 60 well documented Brazilian patients with untreated cutaneous or mucocutaneous leishmaniasis, whose response to treatment was subsequently evaluated in 38 cases. The biopsies were examined with a view to classification after correlation with clinical and immunological findings. Although there was no simple or unified spectrum, five histological groups were defined and found to have some clinico-prognostic significance. In two groups the cases were all cutaneous with a relatively good prognosis. In another two groups they were evolving as mucocutaneous with a poor prognosis. The fifth group showed mixed characteristics with a tendency to relapse. There was no strong correlation with serum antibodies or Montenegro skin test, which were usually positive, or with parasite load, which was always low. The tissue response was distinguished from that in oriental sore by the degree of connective tissue involvement in all groups. It was the primary response in two groups, and subsidiary to a mono-nuclear response in the others. It suggested damage due to extra-cellular parasites or immune complexes. It did not correlate with the distinction between cutaneous and mucocutaneous disease. The single, most favourable, prognostic feature in either the cellular or connective tissue component was necrosis with a reactive response.