Responding to a school SARS-CoV-2 outbreak: Insights and policy implications emerging from the pandemic

Background

The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has affected also the school environment. Prolonged closures and the weakness of available data prevent a definitive answer to the question of school transmission. We report our experience of responding to COVID-19 cases in the school setting, presenting a case study of the management of an outbreak in a large school.

Methods

The LHA/ASL Roma 1 has organized the School Units with a structure firmly rooted in the territory. At the local level, the District Unit mainly manages the relationship with schools, while the Hygiene and Public Health Service of the Prevention Department holds a coordinating and facilitating role. The HPHS carries out contact tracing activities facilitated by the schools, through the figure of the COVID-19 Contact Person, who is specifically trained to manage the preliminary stages of the reports.

Results

Following several reports of COVID-19 suspect cases from two schools and, after a complex phase of contact tracing, it was possible to identify the major transmission chains. Furthermore, we performed a population-based screening on the entire school. Beyond the known transmission chains, for which quarantine was already in place, only five additional cases emerged, all asymptomatic, out of 1,231 swabs tested with RT-PCR.

Conclusions

Our experience confirms that an active interaction between the school and the School Unit made it possible to quickly control a potentially dangerous outbreak. The large-scale screening test demonstrated the substantial absence of collateral transmission chains. Effective contact tracing allowed to set forth a successful response. Our model of intervention can be used to support public health protocols regarding school outbreaks.

Flow-Diversion Treatment for Unruptured ICA Bifurcation Aneurysms with Unfavorable Morphology for Coiling

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Few reports described flow diversion for ICA bifurcation aneurysms. Our aim was to provide further insight into flow diversion for ICA bifurcation aneurysms difficult to treat with other strategies.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Consecutive patients receiving flow diverters for unruptured ICA bifurcation aneurysms were collected. Aneurysm occlusion (O'Kelly-Marotta grading scale) and clinical outcomes were evaluated.

RESULTS

Twenty saccular ICA bifurcation aneurysms were treated with the Pipeline Embolization Device deployed from the M1 to the ICA, covering the aneurysm and the A1 segment. All patients presented with an angiographic visualized contralateral flow from the anterior communicating artery. Mean aneurysm size was 6.5 (SD, 3.2) mm (range, 4.5-20 mm). All lesions had an unfavorable dome-to-neck ratio (mean/median, 1.6/1.6; range, 0.8-2.8; interquartile range = 0.5) or aspect ratio for coiling (mean/median = 1.5/1.55; range, 0.8-2.5; interquartile range = 0.6). One was a very large aneurysm (20 mm). Nineteen medium-sized lesions were completely occluded during the angiographic follow-up (13 months). No cases of aneurysm rupture or retreatment were reported. No adverse events were described. Aneurysm occlusion was associated with the asymptomatic flow modification of the covered A1 that was occluded and contralaterally filled among 10 patients (50%), narrowed among 9 patients (45%), and unchanged in 1 subject (5%). There was no difference in the mean initial diameter of the occluded (2.1 [SD 0.4] mm; range, 1.6-3 mm) and narrowed (2 [SD, 0.2] mm; range, 1.7-2.6 mm) A1 segments.

CONCLUSIONS

Medium-sized unruptured ICA bifurcation aneurysms with unfavorable morphology for coiling can be treated with M1 ICA flow diversion. Aneurysm occlusion is associated with flow modifications of the covered A1 that seems safe in the presence of a favorable collateral anatomy through the anterior communicating artery complex.