Hepatic lipase polymorphism and increased risk of peripheral arterial disease

BACKGROUND

Hepatic lipase plays a key role in the metabolism of pro-atherogenic and anti-atherogenic lipoproteins affecting their plasma level as well as their physico-chemical properties. We hypothesized single nucleotide polymorphisms in the promoter region of the hepatic lipase gene to be associated with an increased risk for peripheral arterial disease (PAD).

METHODS

A total of 241 patients with PAD and 241 controls matched for sex and age (+/-2 years) were genotyped cross-sectionally for the --250 single nucleotide polymorphism in the hepatic lipase promoter. RESULTS. The frequency for the -250 A allele in patients with PAD was 0.203, whereas it was 0.147 in the controls (P=0.022). Hepatic lipase promoter polymorphism distribution remained significantly different between cases and controls after multivariate logistic regression analysis (P=0.021). The odds ratio of the -250 A hepatic lipase allele for the PAD was 1.69 (95% confidence interval of 1.08-2.64), when adjusted for current smoking, arterial hypertension, cholesterol, triglycerides, HbA(1C), total homocysteine and high sensitivity C-reactive protein.

CONCLUSION

Previous data in patients with ischaemic heart disease have suggested a pro-atherogenic role of low hepatic lipase levels. Our results extend these data to the vascular territory of the lower limbs, such that hepatic lipase promoter variation represents a genetic risk factor of PAD.

Lipoprotein(a) and coronary thrombosis and restenosis after stent placement

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this prospective study was to evaluate the relation between high lipoprotein(a) levels and thrombotic and restenotic events after coronary stent implantation.

BACKGROUND

Lipoprotein(a) may promote atherogenesis, coronary thrombosis and restenosis after balloon angioplasty, but the clinical significance remains unclear.

METHODS

The study included 2,223 consecutive patients with successful coronary stent placement. According to the serum level of lipoprotein(a), patients were divided in two groups: 457 patients of the highest quintile formed the high lipoprotein(a) group, and 1,766 patients of the lower four quintiles formed the low lipoprotein(a) group. Primary end points were the incidence of angiographic restenosis at six months and the event-free survival at one year. Secondary end point was the incidence of angiographic stent occlusion.

RESULTS

Early stent occlusion occurred in four of the 457 patients (0.9%) with high and 37 of the 1,766 patients (2.1%) with low lipoprotein(a) levels, odds ratio of 0.41 (95% confidence interval, 0.15 to 1.16). Angiographic restenosis occurred in 173 of the 523 lesions (33.2%) in the high lipoprotein(a) group and 636 of the 1,943 lesions (32.7%) in the low lipoprotein(a) group, odds ratio of 1.02 (0.83 to 1.25). The probability of event-free survival was 73.0% in the high lipoprotein(a) group and 74.8% in the low lipoprotein(a) group (p = 0.45). On the basis of the findings in the low lipoprotein(a) group, the power of this study to detect a 25% increase in the incidence of restenosis and adverse events in the group with elevated lipoprotein(a) was 90% and 75%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Elevated lipoprotein(a) levels did not influence the one-year clinical and angiographic outcome after stent placement. Thrombotic events and measures of restenosis were not adversely affected by the presence of high lipoprotein(a) levels.

Diabetes mellitus and the clinical and angiographic outcome after coronary stent placement

OBJECTIVES

The objectives of this study were to analyze the clinical and angiographic outcome of diabetic patients with successful coronary stent placement and to compare these results with those achieved after stenting in nondiabetic patients.

BACKGROUND

The outcome of diabetic patients treated with stent placement due to coronary artery disease has not been assessed comprehensively.

METHODS

This study analyzes a consecutive series of patients with successful stent placement comprising 715 patients with diabetes and 2,839 patients without diabetes. Clinical one year follow-up and angiographic control at 6 months were part of the protocol. Death, myocardial infarction and target lesion revascularization were considered as adverse events. An automated edge detection system was used for the angiographic assessment. The primary clinical endpoint was event-free survival at one year. The primary angiographic endpoint was restenosis rate at 6 months (> or = 50% diameter stenosis).

RESULTS

Event-free survival was significantly lower in diabetic than in nondiabetic patients (73.1 vs. 78.5%, p < 0.001). Survival free of myocardial infarction was also significantly reduced in the diabetic group (89.9 vs. 94.4% in nondiabetics, p < 0.001). The incidence of both restenosis (37.5 vs. 28.3%, p < 0.001) and stent vessel occlusion (5.3 vs. 3.4%, p = 0.037) was significantly higher in diabetic patients. Diabetes was identified as an independent risk factor for adverse clinical events and restenosis in multivariate analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with diabetes mellitus have a less favorable clinical outcome at one year after successful stent placement as compared to the nondiabetic patients. The clinical follow-up was characterized by a higher incidence of death, myocardial infarction and reinterventions. Diabetic patients also demonstrated an increased risk for restenosis.

Clinical and angiographic outcome after stent placement for chronic coronary occlusion

A consecutive series of 132 patients with total chronic coronary occlusions were compared with 1,966 patients with stenotic lesions in terms of angiographic and clinical outcome. We concluded that patients with chronically occluded coronary lesions present a higher rate of target lesion revascularizations and angiographic restenosis than patients with stenotic lesions.

Intracoronary stenting and risk for major adverse cardiac events during the first month

BACKGROUND

Our rationale for this study was to analyze the risk for procedural failure of attempted stenting and the risk for major adverse cardiac events (MACE) after success and to develop a risk stratification protocol for successful procedures.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Stenting was attempted in 2894 procedures during the 5-year study period (success in 98.3% of 3815 lesions). After failure, the MACE rate was 42.6%. The risk for failure was higher for lesions in the left circumflex coronary artery or in venous bypass grafts and after an acute occlusion before stenting; it increased with stenosis length or grade and decreased with vessel size and growing institutional experience in stenting. After success, death occurred in 0.8%, death or myocardial infarction in 2.0%, and any MACE in 3.6%. Independent risk factors for MACE were older age, diabetes, acute myocardial infarction, unstable angina, impaired left ventricular function, residual dissections, stent overlap, longer stented segments, and a postprocedural regimen without ticlopidine. Procedural factors were substantially stronger predictors than operator-independent variables available before procedures. Overall, the risk declined after the first 3 days. Two major factors exhibited time-dependent variations of their influence: while residual dissections were the dominant risk factor within the first 3 days with a reduction after that, no protective effect of ticlopidine could be identified before day 3. From these results, we derived a risk stratification protocol for individual procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

These results underscore the importance of optimal angiographic results and the need for antiplatelet regimens with immediate onset. Our risk stratification protocol may guide individual postprocedural care and allow us to compare risk profiles of different study populations and to devise quality control programs for stenting.

Predictive factors of restenosis after coronary stent placement

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to identify clinical, lesional and procedural factors that can predict restenosis after coronary stent placement.

BACKGROUND

Coronary stent placement reduces the restenosis rate compared with that after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA). However, restenosis remains an unresolved issue, and identification of its predictive factors may allow further insight into the underlying process.

METHODS

All patients with successful coronary stent placement were eligible for this study unless they had had a major adverse cardiac event during the 1st 30 days after the procedure. Of the 1,349 eligible patients (1,753 lesions), follow-up angiography at 6 months was performed in 80.4% (1,084 patients, 1,399 lesions). Demographic, clinical, lesional and procedural data were prospectively recorded and analyzed for any predictive power for the occurrence of late restenosis after stenting. Restenosis was evaluated by using three outcomes at follow-up: binary restenosis as a diameter stenosis > or =50%, late lumen loss as lumen diameter reduction and target lesion revascularization (TLR) as any repeat PTCA or coronary artery bypass surgery involving the stented lesion.

RESULTS

Multivariate analysis demonstrated that diabetes mellitus, placement of multiple stents and minimal lumen diameter (MLD) immediately after stenting were the strongest predictors of restenosis. Diabetes increased the risk of binary restenosis with an odds ratio (OR) [95% confidence interval] of 1.86 [1.56 to 2.16] and the risk of TLR with an OR of 1.45 [1.11 to 1.80]. Multiple stents increased the risk of binary restenosis with an OR of 1.81 [1.55 to 2.06] and that of TLR with an OR of 1.94 [1.66 to 2.22]. An MLD <3 mm at the end of the procedure augmented the risk of binary restenosis with an OR of 1.81 [1.55 to 2.06] and that of TLR with an OR of 2.05 [1.77 to 2.34]. Classification and regression tree analysis demonstrated that the incidence of restenosis may be as low as 16% for a lesion without any of these risk factors and as high as 59% for a lesion with a combination of these risk factors.

CONCLUSIONS

Diabetes, multiple stents and smaller final MLD are strong predictors of restenosis after coronary stent placement. Achieving an optimal result with a minimal number of stents during the procedure may significantly reduce this risk even in patients with adverse clinical characteristics such as diabetes.

Antiplatelet effect of ticlopidine after coronary stenting

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to investigate the contribution of ticlopidine to the inhibition of platelet activation after coronary stent placement.

BACKGROUND

After coronary stenting, antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and ticlopidine improves stent patency compared with anticoagulation. However, the specific role of ticlopidine has not been elucidated.

METHODS

After successful coronary stent placement, we randomized 22 patients to receive ticlopidine and aspirin (ticlopidine group) and 25 to receive aspirin alone (aspirin group). Surface expression on platelets of the activated fibrinogen receptor and of P-selectin was assessed by flow cytometry.

RESULTS

In the aspirin group the percent of platelets with activated fibrinogen receptors increased between days 1 and 5 (p = 0.001), whereas there were no substantial changes in the ticlopidine group. The percent of P-selectin-positive platelets did not change significantly in the aspirin group but decreased in the ticlopidine group (p = 0.019). At day 5 after the intervention, the percent of platelets with activated fibrinogen receptors in the ticlopidine group was significantly lower (median [interquartile range]: 8.5 [3.1 to 17.8] vs. 18.1 [8.5 to 35.5], p = 0.025), and there was a trend to fewer P-selectin-positive platelets than in the aspirin group (5.8 [3.4 to 9.5] vs. 8.8 [4.0 to 15.8], p = 0.073).

CONCLUSIONS

Combined antiplatelet therapy with ticlopidine plus aspirin is superior to treatment with aspirin alone in suppressing platelet activation after coronary stenting.

[Echocaridographic measurements of left ventricle, heart volume, and maximal oxygen uptake (author's transl)]

Echocardiograms, radiological heart volume and datas by treadmill-exercis of 50 endurance athlets were studied. There was a highly significant correlation between radiological heart volume and left ventricular dimension as well as left ventricular volume including stroke volume. Other good relations were found between echocardiographic measurements and maximal oxygen uptake. These findings of left ventricular echocardiographic dimensions compared with heart volume and oxygen uptake support the value of this method and permit its use in the analysis of physiological and pathologic changes.