Characteristics, outcomes, prognostic factors and treatment of patients with T-cell prolymphocytic leukemia (T-PLL)

Background

T-cell prolymphocytic leukemia (T-PLL) is a rare and aggressive disease. In this study, we report our experience from 119 patients with T-PLL.

Patients and methods

We reviewed the clinico-pathologic records of 119 consecutive patients with T-PLL, who presented to our institution between 1990 and 2016.

Results

One hundred and nineteen patients with T-PLL were analysed. Complex karyotype and aberrations in chromosome 14 were seen in 65% and 52% patients, respectively. Seventy-five patients (63%) were previously untreated and 43 (37%) were initially treated outside our institution. Sixty-three previously untreated patients (84%) received frontline therapies. Overall, 95 patients (80%) have died. Median overall survival (OS) from diagnosis was 19 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 16-26 months]. Using recursive partitioning (RP), we found that patients with hemoglobin < 9.3 g/dl, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) ≥ 1668 IU/l, white blood cell  ≥ 208 K/l and β2M ≥ 8 mg/l had significantly inferior OS and patients with hemoglobin < 9.3 g/dl had inferior progression-free survival (PFS). In multivariate analysis, we identified that presence of pleural effusion [hazard ratio (HR) 2.08 (95% CI 1.11-3.9); P = 0.02], high LDH (≥ 1668 IU/l) [HR 2.5 (95% CI 1.20-4.24); P < 0.001)], and low hemoglobin (< 9.3 g/dl) [HR 0.33 (95% CI 0.14-0.75); P = 0.008] were associated with shorter OS. Fifty-five previously untreated patients received treatment with an alemtuzumab-based regimen (42 monotherapy and 13 combination with pentostatin). Overall response rate, complete remission rate (CR) for single-agent alemtuzumab and alemtuzumab combined with pentostatin were 83%, 66% and 82%, 73% respectively. In patients who achieved initial CR, stem cell transplantation was not associated with longer PFS and OS.

Conclusion

Outcomes in T-PLL remain poor. Multicenter collaborative effort is required to conduct prospective studies.

Fludarabine with pharmacokinetically guided IV busulfan is superior to fixed-dose delivery in pretransplant conditioning of AML/MDS patients

We hypothesized that IV Busulfan (Bu) dosing could be safely intensified through pharmacokinetic (PK-) dose guidance to minimize the inter-patient variability in systemic exposure (SE) associated with body-sized dosing, and this should improve outcome of AML/MDS patients undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). To test this hypothesis, we treated 218 patients (median age 50.7 years, male/female 50/50%) with fludarabine (Flu) 40 mg/m² once daily ×4, each dose followed by IV Bu, randomized to 130 mg/m² (N=107) or PK-guided to average daily SE, AUC of 6,000 µM-min (N=111), stratified for remission-status, and allo-grafting from HLA-matched donors. Toxicity and graft vs. host disease (GvHD) rates in the groups were similar; the risk of relapse or treatment-related mortality remained higher in the fixed-dose group throughout the 80-month observation period. Further, PK-guidance yielded safer disease-control, leading to improved overall and progression-free survival, most prominently in MDS-patients and in AML-patients not in remission at allo-HSCT. We conclude that AML/MDS patients receiving pretransplant conditioning treatment with our 4-day regimen may benefit significantly from PK-guided Bu-dosing. This could be considered an alternative to fixed dose delivery since it provides the benefit of precise dose delivery to a predetermined SE without increasing risk(s) of serious toxicity and/or GvHD.

Allogeneic stem-cell transplantation in patients with cutaneous lymphoma: updated results from a single institution

BACKGROUND

Cutaneous T-cell lymphomas (CTCLs) and its common variants mycosis fungoides (MF) and leukemic Sézary syndrome (SS) are rare extranodal non-Hodgkin's lymphomas. Patients who present with advanced disease and large-cell transformation (LCT) are incurable with standard treatments. In this article, we report the largest single-center experience with allogeneic stem-cell transplantation (SCT) for advanced CTCL.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This is a prospective case series of 47 CTCL patients who underwent allogeneic SCT after failure of standard therapy between July 2001 and September 2013. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) curves. The method of Fine and Gray was used to fit regression models to the same covariates for these cumulative incidence data.

RESULTS

The Kaplan-Meier estimates of OS and PFS at 4 years were 51% and 26%, respectively. There was no statistical difference in the OS in patients who had MF alone, SS, MF with LCT, or SS with LCT. PFS at 4 years was superior in patients who had SS versus those who did not (52.4% versus 9.9%; P = 0.02). The cumulative incidences of grade 2-4 acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and chronic GVHD were 40% and 28%, respectively. The cumulative nonrelapse mortality rate was 16.7% at 2 years.

CONCLUSION

Allogeneic SCT may result in long-term remissions in a subset of patients with advanced CTCL. Although post-SCT relapse rates are high, many patients respond to immunomodulation and achieve durable remissions.

CLINICALTRIALSGOV

NCT00506129.

Intravenous BU plus Mel: an effective, chemotherapy-only transplant conditioning regimen in patients with ALL

We investigated the administration of i.v. BU combined with melphalan (Mel) in patients with ALL undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic SCT. Forty-seven patients with a median age of 33 years (range 20-61) received a matched sibling (n=27) or matched unrelated donor transplant (n=20) for ALL in first CR (n=26), second CR (n=13), or with more advanced disease (n=8). BU was infused daily for 4 days, either at a fixed dose of 130 mg/m² (5 patients) or using pharmacokinetic (PK) dose adjustment (42 patients), to target an average daily area-under-the-curve (AUC) of 5000 μmol/min, determined by a test dose of i.v. BU at 32 mg/m². This was followed by a rest day, then two daily doses of Mel at 70 mg/m². Stem cells were infused on the following day. The 2-year OS, PFS and non-relapse mortality (NRM) rates were 35% (95% confidence interval (CI), 23-51%), 31% (95% CI, 21-48%) and 37% (95% CI, 23-50%), respectively. Acute NRM at 100 days was favorable at 12% (95% CI, 5-24%); however, the 2-year NRM was significantly higher for patients older than 40 years, 58% vs 20%, mainly due to GVHD.

Clofarabine combined with busulfan provides excellent disease control in adult patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

We investigated the safety and early disease control data for i.v. busulfan (Bu) in combination with clofarabine (Clo) in patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (SCT). Fifty-one patients (median age, 36 years; range, 20-64 years) received a matched sibling (n = 24), syngeneic (n = 2), or matched unrelated donor transplant (n = 25) for acute lymphoblastic leukemia in first complete remission (n = 30), second complete remission (n = 13), or active disease (n = 8). More than one-half of the patients had a high-risk cytogenetic profile, as defined by the presence of t(9;22) (n = 17), t(4;11) (n = 3), or complex cytogenetics (n = 7). Clo 40 mg/m(2) was given once daily, with each dose followed by pharmacokinetically dosed Bu infused over 3 hours daily for 4 days, followed by hematopoietic SCT 2 days later. The Bu dose was based on drug clearance, as determined by the patient's response to a 32-mg/m(2) Bu test dose given 48 hours before the high-dose regimen. The target daily area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve was 5500 μM/min for patients age <60 years and 4000 μM/min for those age ≥60 years. The regimen was well tolerated, with a 100-day nonrelapse mortality rate of 6%. With a median follow-up of 14 months among surviving patients (range, 6-28 months), the 1-year overall survival, disease-free survival, and nonrelapse mortality rates were 67% (95% confidence interval [CI], 55%-83%), 54% (95% CI, 41%-71%), and 32% (95% CI, 16%-45%), respectively. For patients undergoing SCT in first remission, these respective rates were 74%, 64%, and 25%. Our data indicate that the combination of Clo and Bu provides effective disease control while maintaining a favorable safety profile.

High-dose chemotherapy and autologous hematopoietic progenitor cell transplantation for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma in patients >65 years of age

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We present a retrospective analysis of 99 consecutive patients with relapsed non-Hodgkin's lymphomas who were older than 65 years at the time of high-dose chemotherapy and autologous progenitor cell transplantation.

RESULTS

Median age at transplant was 68 years (range 65-82). Thirty-six percent of patients had a hematopoietic cell transplantation comorbidity index of >2 at the time of transplantation. The cumulative nonrelapse mortality was 8% [95% confidence interval (CI) 4-17] at 26 months and the 3-year overall survival (OS) was 61% (95% CI 49-71). On multivariate analysis, disease status at transplant and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) > normal were significant predictors for OS (P = 0.002). Comorbidity index of >2 did not impact OS but did predict for higher risk of developing grade 3-5 toxicity (P = 0.006). Eight patients developed secondary myelodysplastic syndrome/acute myelogenous leukemia after transplantation (cumulative incidence 16%).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with relapsed lymphomas who are >65 years of age should be considered transplant candidates, particularly if they have chemosensitive disease and normal LDH levels at the time of transplantation. Patients with comorbidity index of >2 can also undergo transplantation with acceptable outcomes but may be at higher risk for developing toxicity.

Long-term survival of patients with AML in remission after reduced intensity allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (RISCT)

7002

Background: RISCT was developed to harness graft versus leukemia effect to treat older patients (pts) and pts with comorbidities. Limited data are available on long term outcome of pts with high risk AML treated in complete remission (CR), a group most likely to benefit from this approach. Methods: Thirty six consecutive pts with AML in CR, treated between 1999 and 2006 with Fludarabine 120–125 mg/m2 and Melphalan 100–140 mg/m2 are included. Pts were not eligible for myeloablative transplantation because of age or comorbidity. Tacrolimus and Methotrexate were used as GVHD prophylaxis. Additionally pts receiving stem cells from an unrelated donor received rabbit antithymocyte globulin. Results: There were 24 males and 12 females with a median age of 57 (range 21–71). Eighteen(50%) pts had secondary AML. Thirty(83%) pts were in first CR and 6(17%) in second CR. Cytogenetic risk groups were as follows: 2 good risk (in CR2), 22 intermediate risk(61%), and 10(28%) poor risk. Source of stem cells was peripheral blood in 18 pts (50%) and bone marrow in 18 pts (50%). Donors were siblings in 21(58%) pts and unrelated in 15 (42%)pts. Hematopoietic cell transplant specific comorbidity score of 3 or higher was present in 26 pts (72%). All pts engrafted achieving full donor chimerism by day 30 with median time to neutrophil engraftment of 12.5 days (8–19 days). Cumulative incidence of grade 2–4 acute graft versus host disease (GVHD), grade 3–4 GVHD and chronic GVHD was 25% (95% CI; 14%–44%), 11% (95% CI; 4%–28%), and 63% (95% CI; 47%–84%) respectively. Cumulative incidence of nonrelapse mortality was 19% (95% CI; 8%–41%). With a median follow up of 852 days, 3 year overall and disease free survival is 75% (SE 9%) and 63% (SE 10%) respectively. Comorbidity scores didnot impact outcome. Conclusions: Reduced intensity allogeneic transplantation with Fludarabine and Melphalan conditioning produces durable long term remission in pts with high risk AML in complete remission. These results in older pts and/or pts with comorbidities are comparable to published results in younger pts receiving myeloablative transplantation. Comorbidity scores by themselves should not be used to exclude patients from receiving transplant.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

A phase I dose escalation trial of ispinesib (SB-715992) administered days 1–3 of a 21-day cycle in patients with advanced solid tumors

2026

Background: Ispinesib, a novel cytotoxic agent inhibiting the kinesin spindle protein (KSP) has demonstrated significant antitumor activity in multiple murine tumor models. The primary objectives of the study were to assess the safety and tolerability of SB-715992, to determine the dose limiting toxicity (DLT), and the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Methods: Ispinesib was administered days 1–3 intravenously over 1 hour every 21 days, starting at a dose of 1 mg/m2/day. Traditional 3-patient cohort trial design was utilized with dose levels of 2, 4, 6, 8 mg/m2/day. Results: Twenty-seven patients (24 Caucasians, 3 African-Americans, 16 males, 11 females) with various tumor types were enrolled; colorectal (7), renal (5), bladder (2), lung (2), pharynx (2), pancreas (2), others (7). Grade 3/4 toxicities were noted starting at the 4 mg/m2 dose level with two patients developing grade 4 neutropenia; one for < 5 days, one for > 5 days (with grade 3 leukopenia). At the 6 mg/m2 dose level, grade 3 neutropenia and leukopenia were reported. At the 8 mg/m2 dose level, 3 of 3 patients had grade 4 neutropenia and leukopenia. The 6 mg/m2 dose level was declared the MTD. Toxicities seen in the additional 6 patients included grade 1 fatigue (1/6), grade 1 infusion- related flushing (1/6), grade 3 febrile neutropenia (1/6), and grade 4 neutropenia and leukopenia (1/6). The MTD cohort has been expanded to 10 evaluable patients for confirmation of tolerability and pharmacodynamic endpoints including phosphohistone 3 (PH3), cyclin E, and TUNEL assay on serial tumor biopsies. Preliminary pharmacokinetic data appear linear, but not dose proportional. As predicted, between days 1 and 3, accumulation ranged from 40 to 106%. Exposures appear comparable between cycles 1 and 2. Stable disease in 2 patients with renal cell carcinoma (4 and 5 cycles) and minor response in one patient with bladder cancer were seen. Conclusions: Treatment with ispinesib at the MTD of 6 mg/m2/day x 3 days in patients with advanced solid tumors was well tolerated with consistent dose limiting toxicity of myelosuppression.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.