Africa Guidelines for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Buildup Process

PURPOSE

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), the fourth most common cancer in Africa, has a dismal overall survival of only 3 months like in sub-Saharan Africa. This is affected by the low gross domestic product and human development index, absence of coherent guidelines, and other factors.

METHODS

An open forum for HCC-experienced health care workers from Africa and the rest of the world was held in October 2021. Participants completed a survey to help assess the real-life access to screening, diagnoses, and treatment in the North and Southern Africa (NS), East and West Africa (EW), Central Africa (C), and the rest of the world.

RESULTS

Of 461 participants from all relevant subspecialties, 372 were from Africa. Most African participants provided hepatitis B vaccination and treatment for hepatitis B and C. More than half of the participants use serum alpha-fetoprotein and ultrasound for surveillance. Only 20% reported using image-guided diagnostic liver biopsy. The Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer is the most used staging system (52%). Liver transplant is available for only 28% of NS and 3% EW. C reported a significantly lower availability of resection. Availability of local therapy ranged from 94% in NS to 62% in C. Sorafenib is the most commonly used systemic therapy (66%). Only 12.9% reported access to other medications including immune checkpoint inhibitors. Besides 42% access to regorafenib in NS, second-line treatments were not provided.

CONCLUSION

Similarities and differences in the care for patients with HCC in Africa are reported. This reconfirms the major gaps in access and availability especially in C and marginally less so in EW. This is a call for concerted multidisciplinary efforts to achieve and sustain a reduction in incidence and mortality from HCC in Africa.

Middle East and North Africa Registry to Characterize Rate of RAS Testing Status in Newly Diagnosed Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

BACKGROUND

Rat sarcoma virus mutational status guides first-line treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer. This study was a multi center, multi-country ambispective, observational study in the Middle East and North Africa assessing regional rat sarcoma virus testing practices in newly diagnosed patients.

METHODS

The retrospective arm (2011-2014) included adults with metastatic colorectal cancer who had initiated first-line therapy with ≥1 post-baseline visit and survival data. The prospective arm (2014-2019) enrolled newly diagnosed patients with histologically proven metastatic colorectal cancer with ≥1 measurable lesion per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, and tissue availability for biomarker analysis. Data look-back and follow-up were 2 years; the rate of RAS mutation was evaluated.

RESULTS

RAS testing was ordered for patients in retrospective (326/417) and prospective (407/500) studies. In the former, testing was typically prescribed after first-line treatment initiation, significantly more in patients with stage IV disease (P < .005), resulting in the addition of targeted therapy (41.8% anti-epidermal growth factor receptor, 30.2% anti-vascular endothelial growth factor) in wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer, and significantly impacted the treatment of left-sided tumors (P = .037). In the latter, 58.4% were RAS wild-type; 41.6% were RAS mutant. Non-prescription of RAS testing was attributed to test unavailability, financial, or medical rea sons; predictors of testing prescription were older age, primary tumor in ascending colon, and high tumor grade. RAS status knowledge resulted in the addition of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (20.4%) or anti-epidermal growth factor receptor therapy (21.2%).

CONCLUSION

Before 2014, RAS testing in patients with colorectal cancer in the Middle East and North Africa was often performed after first-line treatment. Testing is more routine in newly diagnosed patients, potentially shifting early treatment patterns.

Neoadjuvant endocrine therapy with or without palbociclib in low-risk patients: a phase III randomized double-blind SAFIA trial

BACKGROUND

The most prevalent subtype of breast cancer (BC) is luminal hormonal-positive breast cancer. The neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimens have side effects, emphasizing the need to identify new startegies.

OBJECTIVE

Analyze the complete pathologic response (pCR) rate and overall response in a low-risk hormone-positive subset of patients receiving neoadjuvant hormone treatment (NAHT) with or without Palbociclib (a CDK4/CDK6 inhibitor) to boost NAHT effectiveness.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Based on the upfront 21-gene Oncotype DX or low-risk Breast Recurrence Score assay (RS™), the SAFIA trial is designed as a prospective multicenter international, double-blind neoadjuvant phase-III trial that selects operable with luminal BC patients that are HER2-negative for the induction hormonal therapy with Fulvestrant 500 mg ± Goserelin (F/G) followed by randomization of responding patients to palbociclib versus placebo. The pCR rate served as the study's main outcome, while the secondary endpoint was a clinical benefit.

RESULTS

Of the 354 patients enrolled, 253 initially responded and were randomized to either F/G fulvestrant with palbociclib or placebo. Two hundred twenty-nine were eligible for the evaluation of the pathologic response. No statistically significant changes were observed in the pCR rates for the patients treated with the F/G therapy with placebo or palbociclib (7% versus 2%, respectively) per the Chevallier classification (Class1 + Class2) (p = 0.1464) and 3% versus 10% assessed per Sataloff Classification (TA, NA/NB) (p = 0.3108). Palbociclib did not increase the rate of complete pathological response.

CONCLUSION

Neoadjuvant hormonal therapy is feasible in a selected population with a low RS score of < 31 CLINICAL TRIAL: NCT03447132.

The first Middle East and North Africa expert consensus recommendations for the management of advanced colorectal cancer

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is ranked as the third most prevalent and the second deadliest cancer worldwide. In the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region, the number of CRC cases increased over the past decades and will nearly double by 2030. The lack of clear MENA guidelines for the management of patients with CRC represents a step backwards in the fight against this burden. Therefore a panel of 24 MENA experts in the field of gastrointestinal oncology developed, using a Delphi process, the first consensus recommendations for the management of patients with advanced CRC. Forty-seven different statements were formulated in the areas of epidemiology, screening, biomarkers and treatment. These recommendations will guide, standardize and unify the management of this cancer in the MENA region.

Presentation, management, and outcome of COVID-19 among patients with cancer in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region

e18797

Background: Patients with cancer are vulnerable population that suffered during the COVID-19 pandemic from SARS-CoV-2 infection and from the pandemic’s impact on healthcare systems. We are presenting the findings of MENA Registry for COVID-19 and Cancer (MRCC) regarding the SARS-CoV-2 infection presentation, diagnosis, treatment, complications, and outcomes. Methods: MRCC was adapted from ASCO COVID-19 Registry and included patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection and underlying cancer diagnosis including a newly diagnosed cancer in the work-up phase or patients with active cancer receiving cancer therapy or supportive care, or within first year of adjuvant chemotherapy or after one year of curative therapy and receiving hormonal therapy. Registry included data on patients from 12 centers in eight countries in the MENA region, namely: Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Lebanon, Turkey, Egypt, Algeria, United Arab Emirates, and Morocco. The data included patient and disease characteristics, COVID-19 presentation, management, and outcomes. The follow up is differential as data get captured at different points of disease trajectory for each patient which may not reflect the final outcome. Results: Data on 1345 patients were captured in the study by December 7, 2021. Median age was 57.1 years (18-98), whereas 56.1% were females. The median follow-up was 98.5 days (0-554). The most common COVID-19 symptoms was fever (50.3%) and 26.8% of patients were asymptomatic. Out of the 959 patients with complete data on hospitalization, 554 (57.8%) were hospitalized and 126 of them (22.7%) were admitted to intensive care unit (ICU). The majority of hospitalized patients (60%) had respiratory complications and 13.9% had sepsis and 8.5% suffered acute renal injury. As shown in Table, more than quarter of the patients died with 47% of death from COVID-19 or related complication and 60.6% died at home. More than half of the patients were fully recovered from infection. Conclusions: Although more than half of the patients recovered form COVID-19 and more are expected to recover with a longer follow up, the death toll and complications remain high in this patient population. Future analysis of the impact of vaccination and better disease management as well as the impact of newer variants would provide a useful insight on managing this vulnerable population.[Table: see text]

Final result for SAFIA trial for neoadjuvant palbociclib in patients with operable luminal breast cancer responding to fulvestrant

596

Background: Luminal, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative breast cancer (BC) encompasses the most common subtype of breast malignancies. Neoadjuvant strategies of operable BC are primarily based upon chemotherapy (CT), while neoadjuvant hormone therapy (NAHT) has not been well studied in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region. However, these tumors might respond poorly to neoadjuvant CT with significant side effects, emphasizing the need to identify patients who could be candidates for NAHT. Methods: The SAFIA trial is a prospective multicentre, international, double-blind, neoadjuvant phase-III trial using upfront 21-gene Oncotype DX Breast Recurrence Score assay (RS) <31) to select operable Luminal HER2-negative patients for induction hormonal therapy with Fulvestrant 500 mg +/– Goserelin (F/G) before randomizing responding patients to F/G + Palbociclib (Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 4/6 inhibitor / CDK 4/6) versus F/G + Placebo. The primary endpoint of this study was the complete pathologic response (pCR) rate. Results: A total of 354 patients were enrolled, leading to 277 patients treated with induction F/G. Of these, 253 responding patients were randomized to F/G fulvestrant with palbociclib or Placebo. Two hundred and thirty patients were evaluable for pathologic response. No statistically significant differences were identified in terms of pCR rates between F/G with palbociclib or placebo: 2% versus 7%, respectively. According to the radiologic responses post- induction F/G, the hormone sensitivity rate was 89.8%, while the clinical benefit of 8–9 months of neoadjuvant F/G was 96%. Safety in the MENA population was acceptable with a grade 3-4 neutropenia rate of 25% in the F/G plus palbociclib arm. The feasibility of performing the 21-gene breast recurrence score assay on core biopsy specimens was optimal in 96.4% of cases. Conclusions: The addition of palbociclib to neoadjuvant F/G did not show any additional benefit in terms of pathologic response, including pCR in neoadjuvant therapy of Luminal HER2-negative BC responding to induction F/G. The use of an upfront 21-gene assay appeared feasible on biopsy specimens, and the identification of tumors with RS<31 allowed to select endocrine sensitive patients, leading ultimately to a 96% clinical benefit with 8–9 months of F/G neoadjuvant therapy. Clinical trial information: NCT03447132. [Table: see text]

Cancer Burden Among Arab World Males in 2020: The Need for a Better Approach to Improve Outcome

PURPOSE

Cancer is a leading cause of increased morbidity and mortality worldwide. This work aims to study the Arab world males' cancers (AMCs) and the similarities and disparities with the world males' cancers (WMCs) from different burden points of view.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A descriptive review of the 2020 Global Cancer Observatory revealed AMCs compared with the 2020 WMCs and the 2018 AMCs. Data on the top 27 AMCs were compared among the region's countries and the world groups.

RESULTS

In 2020, a total estimate of 217,203 new AMCs, 2.2% of WMCs, with an average age-standardized rate of 133.5/100,000 population, compared with 222/100,000 population of WMCs, was observed. Death estimates were 148,395, 2.7% of WMCs, with an average age-standardized rate of 95/100,000 population, compared with 120.8/100,000 population of WMCs. The five-year prevalence was observed in 442,014, 1.8% of WMCs. The average AMC mortality to incidence ratio (MIR) was 0.68, compared with 0.55 in WMCs and 0.54 in Arab females. Lung cancer was the top in incidence and mortality, whereas penile cancer was the lowest. The range of MIRs among the 27 cancer types was 0.19-0.96.

CONCLUSION

The descriptive review of the 2020 males' cancers in the Arab world revealed a relatively high MIR, compared with males' cancers worldwide and the females' cancers in the Arab world. This requires further evaluation to discern the underlying causes and address them systematically. More cancer control actions are warranted.

Predictors of poor precautionary practices towards COVID-19 among cancer patients

Objective: Our study goal was to evaluate the behavioral response and practices of cancer patients to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic in the Middle East and north Africa. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted using a validated anonymous 45-question survey administered via SurveyMonkey^® to cancer patients in 13 centers in Algeria, Egypt, Jordan, Kuwait, Morocco and Saudi Arabia. Results: During the study period (from 21 April to 30 May 2020), 3642 patients participated in the study. The majority of patients (84.81%) were worried about contracting the infection. The reported strict adherence to precautions included avoiding the following actions: hand-shaking (77.40%), hugging and kissing (82.89%), social gathering (90.09%), meeting friends (84.68%) and visiting markets (75.65%). In a multivariate analysis, patients with poor precautionary practices were about twice as likely to cancel their medical appointment or a treatment session. Conclusion: Improving cancer patients' knowledge of and adherence to precautionary measures is needed not just to reduce the risk of acquiring infection but also to minimize the interruption of their medical care.

Response to Induction Neoadjuvant Hormonal Therapy Using Upfront 21-Gene Breast Recurrence Score Assay-Results From the SAFIA Phase III Trial

Luminal, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–negative breast cancer represents the most common subtype of breast malignancies. Neoadjuvant strategies of operable breast cancer are mostly based on chemotherapy, whereas it is not completely understood which patients might benefit from neoadjuvant hormone therapy (NAHT).

National approaches to managing cancer care: responses of countries in the MENA region to the COVID-19 pandemic

BACKGROUND

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic presents serious challenges to cancer care because of the associated risks from the infection itself and the disruption of care delivery. Therefore, many professional societies have published recommendations to help manage patients with cancer during the current pandemic. The objective of our study is to assess the national responses of Middle East North Africa (MENA) countries in terms of publishing relevant guidelines and analyse various components of these guidelines.

METHODS

A survey based on the preliminary review of the literature regarding cancer care adaptations has been developed and then completed by a group of oncologists from the following Arab countries affected by the pandemic: Algeria, Egypt, Iraq, Jordan, Kuwait, Lebanon, Morocco, Oman, Saudi Arabia, Syria, Tunisia, United Arab Emirates and Yemen. The survey inquired about COVID-19 cases, national recommendations regarding general measures of COVID-19 prevention and patient care in oncology as well as their implementation about cancer care adaptations during the pandemic.

RESULTS

Analysis of the COVID-19 pandemic-related guidelines revealed at least 30 specific recommendations that we categorised into seven essential components. All included countries had national guidelines except one country. Estimated full compliances with all specific category recommendations ranged from 30% to 69% and partial compliance ranged from 23% to 61%.

CONCLUSION

There is a very good response and preparedness in the Arab Middle East and North Africa region surveyed. However, there are inconsistencies in the various components of the guidelines across the region, which reflects the evolving status of the pandemic in each country as well as the lack of clear evidence-based guidelines for many of the issues in question. There is a need for a clear framework on essential components that should be included in these guidelines to assure providing the best guidance to the oncology community.

Epidemiology of breast cancer in women based on diagnosis data from oncologists and senologists in Algeria

BACKGROUND

Breast cancer (BC) is a major health issue threatening women's life. No reliable epidemiological data on BC diagnosed by oncologists/senologists are available in Algeria.

METHODS

The BreCaReAl study, a non-interventional prospective cohort study, included adult women with confirmed BC in Algeria. Disease incidence, patients and disease characteristics, treatment patterns, and mortality rate were recorded up to 12 months of follow-up.

RESULTS

Overall, 1,437 patients were analysed: median age was 48 [41;57] years and 337 (23.5%) women had a family history of BC. BC incidence was 22.3 (95% CI: 21.5; 23.2) cases per 100,000 inhabitants over 8 months. Delayed diagnosis was reported in 400 (29.2%) patients. First line of treatments were mainly chemotherapy and surgery. Twenty-eight serious adverse events were reported including 10 (37.0%) events which led to death. Mortality rate reached 3.2% at 12 months CONCLUSION: A delayed diagnosis highlights the importance of implementing more effective screening strategies.

Incidence of lung cancer in males and females in Algeria: The lung cancer registry in Algeria (LuCaReAl)

BACKGROUND

Lung cancer is a major cause of death worldwide. However, few data on incidence, histologic types and mortality rates of lung cancer were available for Algeria.

METHODS

LuCaReAl is an ongoing descriptive, non-interventional, national, multicenter, prospective and longitudinal study conducted in Algeria, among oncologists and pulmonologists in public community and university hospitals. Median and interquartile ranges are displayed.

RESULTS

Between July 2016 and July 2017, 897 patients were included. Overall incidence of lung cancer was 3.4 [3.2;3.6] cases per 100,000 inhabitants; overall incidence by sex was 5.8 [5.4;6.2] for males and 1.0 [0.8;1.1] for females. Adenocarcinoma was the most common histologic type of cancer. Most tumors were diagnosed at Stage IV.

CONCLUSION

The first results from the LuCaReAl study in Algeria showed that most patients are diagnosed with lung cancer at an advanced stage. The ongoing follow-up will next provide data on the survival and mortality rates.

Expression of Immune Response Markers in Arab Patients With Lung Cancer

PURPOSE

Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) is a marker for checkpoint inhibitor use in the management of solid tumors, especially in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Our study was aimed at determining the patterns of PD-L1 expression and cluster of differentiation 8 (CD8) immunostains in patients with NSCLC in the Arab population.

METHODS

Archival tumor tissue from patients with a confirmed diagnosis of NSCLC were obtained and stained for PD-L1 with antibody 22C3, using immunohistochemistry staining and giving the tumor proportion score (TPS) as a percentage from 0%-100% of stained tumor cells. Tumors were categorized into negative expressers (TPS < 1%), low positive (TPS, 1%-49%), and high positive (TPS, 50%-100%). Correlation of expression with clinical and pathologic features, including CD8-positive (CD8+) lymphocyte density, was also analyzed.

RESULTS

Two hundred patients with NSCLC were included in the study from 6 centers in Saudi Arabia and Algeria. Median age was 65 years (28-93 years), and the majority were men (75%) with stage 4 NSCLC (64%). The TPS was high in 37 patients (18%), low in 60 patients (30%), and negative in 103 patients (52%). In a univariate analysis, the following were significant predictors of any PD-L1 expression (> 1%): male sex, being Saudi national patients, high expression of CD8+, and presence of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes. In the multivariate analysis, only high expression of CD8+ cells (≥ 2+) was significant, with an odds ratio of 4.4 (95% CI, 1.5 to 12.9; P = .003).

CONCLUSION

PD-L1 expression in our population is similar to the published literature and correlated with the density of CD8+ cells. Validation of the predictive value of this marker in our population and identifying easier and reliable methods to test for it are warranted.

Prospective evaluation of current RAS mutation testing practices in newly diagnosed metastatic colorectal cancer: Middle East and North Africa Registry (MORE-RAS) Study

e16141

Background: RAS testing is essential for treatment selection in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), as anti-EGFR treatment is indicated only in patients with wild-type (WT) RAS. MORE-RAS was a multicenter, multicountry, observational, ambispective (retrospective + prospective) study designed to evaluate RAS mutation status among patients with mCRC in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region. Results of the retrospective study over a prior 2-year period have been previously presented. Here, we report on the prospective evaluation of testing practices in newly diagnosed patients from the same centers. Methods: Five countries (Algeria, Egypt, KSA, Kuwait, Lebanon) enrolled patients between Dec 2014 and Feb 2019. Patients with a new diagnosis of histologically proven mCRC, at least 1 measurable lesion per RECIST criteria, and tissue availability for biomarker analysis were included; those with co-existing malignancies or life expectancy < 6 months were excluded. The primary endpoint was evaluation of the rate of RAS mutation in newly diagnosed patients. Follow-up was for 2 years. Results: 500 patients (mean age 54.6 years; 58% female) were included; 96.4% had Stage 4 disease. Primary tumor sites were sigmoidal colon: 33.4%; rectum: 29.6%; ascending colon: 18.4%; descending colon: 11.4%; transverse colon: 5.2%; and unknown: 1.4%. Most frequent sites of metastasis were liver: 43.4%, lung: 16.0%, and peritoneum: 10.1%. Overall, 407 pts (81.4%; 95% CI, 78%–85%) received prescription for RAS testing. RAS WT was found in 58.4% and mutant in 41.6%; the test was inconclusive in 1 pt. Non-prescription was attributed to test unavailability and medical or financial reasons. The distribution of mutations was KRAS: 85%, NRAS: 4.9%, and not available: 10.1%. Predictors of RAS testing prescription were older age, primary tumor localization in ascending colon, and high tumor grade. Knowledge of RAS status resulted in the addition of bevacizumab or anti-EGFR therapy in 20.4% and 21.2% of pts, respectively at Visit 1 (baseline). Conclusions: RAS testing is now routinely prescribed for newly diagnosed mCRC in the MENA region and can change therapy patterns. The RAS mutation rate in this region differs from that in Western countries.

Prediction of response to neoadjuvant hormonal therapy (NAHT) using upfront oncotype Dx recurrence score (RS): Results from the SAFIA phase III trial

594

Background: While hormonal therapy (HT) is a fundamental treatment in breast cancer therapy, neoadjuvant NAHT is not considered standard. The SAFIA trial is a prospective international neoadjuvant Phase III investigating the potential role of the addition of palbociclib (P) in patients (pts) sensitive to HT. We report the results of induction Faslodex (+/- zoladex) in pts initially selected by RS < 31, in order to assess their individual HT sensitivity before double-blind randomization HT vs HT + P followed by surgery. Materials and Methods: A total of 308 pts (stages II and IIIA Luminal A/B HER2 negative) in 24 centers and 6 countries (Middle-East/Maghreb) underwent upfront RS to select pts for induction HT. Pts with RS < 31 received induction neoadjuvant fulvestrant (500 mg i.m Day 1, 14, 28 then q.4 weeks) + goseriline (3.6 mg s.c q.4 w for pre and peri-menopausal pts) for 4 months, followed by clinical and radiological assessment of the disease response before randomization. Response was defined as no progression: Complete Response-CR/ Partial Response-PR: > 50% and Minor Response-MR: < 50% to > 0%/ No Response-NR: progression > 0%. Results: A total of 70 pts (22%) with RS > 31 were excluded, leaving 238 eligible pts for NAHT, age (25-84); pre-peri/ post menopause: 135 (57%)/103 (43%); Luminal A/B: 112 (49%)/114 (51%); Stage II/IIIA: 196 (87%) / 29 (13%). One hundred and seventy-seven pts (177) have validated responses to induction NAHT: CR: 9 pts (5%) / MR: 105 pts (59%) for major response rate: 64% / MR: 56 pts (32%) / NR: 7 pts (4%); available RS 0-10: 23 pts (16%) / RS 11-18: 67 pts (47%) / RS 19-25: 34 pts (24%) / RS 26-30: 18 pts (13%). Correlations between Response to NAHT and RS are shown in the table below (not statistically significant). Conclusions: In our population, upfront Oncotype DX RS < 31 allowed to select pts for induction NAHT without loss of chances with a no-progression rate (CR+PR = MR) of 96%. No significant correlation was found between RS and response to NAHT. Upfront RS > 31 (22%) is selecting pts candidates for neoadjuvant chemotherapy with a potential high risk of endocrine resistance. Clinical trial information: ICRG1201 .

Expression of immune response markers in Arab patients with lung cancer

e21543

Background: Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) is a marker for checkpoint inhibitors use in management of solid tumor especially non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Our study aimed at determining the patterns of PD-L1 expression and CD8 immunostains in patients with NSCLC in Arab population. Methods: Archival tumor tissue form patients with confirmed diagnosis of NCSLC were obtained and stained for PD-L1 using antibody 22C3 by Dako using Immuno-histochemistry stain (IHC) and giving Tumor Proportion Score (TPS) a percentage number from 0 to 100% of stained tumor cells. Tumors were categorized into negative expressers (TPS<1%), low positive (TPS 1-49%), and high positive (TPS 50% -100%). Correlation of expression with clinical and pathological features including CD8+ lymphocyte density was analyzed. Results: Two hundred NSCLC cases were included in the study from 6 centers in Saudi Arabia and Algeria. Median age was 65 years (28-93) and majority were males (75%) with stage 4 NSCLC (64%). The TPS was high in 37 patients (18%), low in 60 patients (30%), and negative in 103 patients (52%). In a univariate analysis, the following were significant predictors of any PD-L1 expression (>1%): male gender, being Saudi national patients, high expression of CD8+ and the presence of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes. In the multivariate analysis, only high expression of CD8+ cells (>2+) was significant with Odd Ratio (OR) of 4.4 (95% Confidence interval 1.5-12.9, p value of 0.003). Conclusions: PD-L1 expression in our population is similar to the published literature and correlated with the density of CD8+ cells. Validation of the predictive value of this marker in our population and identifying easier and reliable methods to test for it is warranted.

The Study of Druggable Targets in Nonsquamous Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer in the Middle East and North Africa

Background: Druggable molecular targets are very important in the management of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The purpose of our study is to determine the pattern of testing and mutation prevalence in the Middle East and North Africa population. Patients and Methods: Data of consecutive patients with nonsquamous NSCLC were collected from 10 centers in five countries; Saudi Arabia, UAE, Qatar, Lebanon, and Algeria. Statistical analysis was performed to delineate the prevalence of druggable targets and other relevant information. Results: Five hundred and sixty-six patients were included in the study. Majority were males (78.1%) with a median age of 61 years (22–89), 50% were current or ex-smokers and 370 patients (65.4%) were Stage IV. The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) testing was performed on 164 patients of all stages. EGFR mutation was detected in 30 out of 96 patients (31.3%) with metastatic disease and in 12 out of 68 patients (17.6%) with Stage I to III. Female sex (39.5% vs. 22% males, P = 0.032), Stage IV (31.2% vs. 17.6% in Stage I to III, P = 0.049), and positive immunohistochemical-TTF1 (31.4% vs. 8.7% negative, P = 0.026) were predictors of mutation on univariate analysis. The multivariate analysis showed that patients with stage IV have three times higher positivity than lower stages (odds ratio = 3.495, P = 0.036). Anaplastic lymphoma kinase fusion was present in seven out of 89 patients (7.8%) of all stages, and only three out of 52 patients (5.8%) with metastatic disease. The reasons for not performing the tests in all of the 370 patients with metastatic disease were: physicians do not know where and how to send the test (62.3%), lack of funding to perform the test (11.1%), insufficient tissue (10.1%), and other reasons (16.6%). Conclusions: Only a small fraction of patients with NSCLC are tested for druggable targets and the prevalence of EGFR mutation is prevalence higher than the Western population. Overcoming the challenges of testing requires systematic plans to address education and resource allocation.

OSSMAR: An Observational Study to Describe the Use of Sunitinib in Real-Life Practice for the Treatment of Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma

PURPOSE

Sunitinib offers improved efficacy for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). To provide better disease management in the Middle East, we studied its use in mRCC in real-life practice in this region.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Patients diagnosed with mRCC and started on sunitinib between 2006 and 2016 from 10 centers in Africa and the Middle East region were studied in this regional, multicenter, observational, retrospective trial to obtain routine clinical practice data on the usage patterns and outcomes of sunitinib in mRCC in real-life practice.

RESULTS

A total of 289 patients were enrolled. Median age at diagnosis was 58.7 years. The patient characteristics were as follows: 73.6% of patients were males; 85.8% had clear-cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC); 97.5% had unilateral RCC; 66.3% had metastatic disease at initial diagnosis; 56.3% received previous treatment for RCC, among which 98.7% had undergone surgery; and 15.2% and 31.4% were classified in the favorable and poor-risk groups (expanded Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center criteria), respectively. On treatment initiation, the mean total sunitinib dose was 48.1 mg, and 87.6% of patients were started on a sunitinib dose of 50 mg. The mean duration of sunitinib treatment was 9.6 months. Overall response rate was 20.8%, with a median duration of 8.2 months. Median time to progression was 5.7 months. Median follow-up time was 7.8 months. By months 12 and 24, 34.3% and 11.4% of patients, respectively, were still alive. Seventy-six patients (60.9%) experienced 314 adverse events. Twenty-three patients (8.0%) experienced 28 serious adverse events. Overall, 83 patients (28.7%) discontinued their sunitinib treatment.

CONCLUSION

The results are indicative of the general treatment outcomes of patients with mRCC in the Middle East using sunitinib in routine clinical practice. Reported adverse events are similar to those described in the literature but at lower frequencies.

Patterns of diagnostic procedures for lung cancer pathology in the Middle East and North Africa

Background

Accurate pathological diagnosis is the first critical step in the management of lung cancer. This step is important to determine the histological subtype of the cancer and to identify any actionable targets. Our study aimed at evaluating the patterns of procedures used to obtain pathological diagnosis of lung cancer in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) Region.

Methods

Data of consecutive patients with the diagnosis of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were collected from participating centers from different countries in the MENA Region. Methods of obtaining tissue diagnosis and workup were analyzed to determine the practice patterns of obtaining tissue diagnosis of lung cancer.

Results

A total of 566 patients were recruited from 10 centers in 5 countries including Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates (UAE), Qatar, Lebanon and Algeria. Majority of patients were males (78.1%) with a median age of 61 years (range, 22-89 years). Obtaining tissue diagnosis was successful in the first attempt in 72.3% of patients, while 16.4% and 6.3% of patients required 2^nd and 3^rd attempt, respectively. The success in first attempt was as follows: image guided biopsy (91%), surgical biopsy (88%), endobronchial biopsy (79%) and cytology (30%). The success in the second attempt was as follows; surgical biopsy (100%), image guided biopsy (95%), endobronchial biopsy (65%), cytology (25%).

Conclusions

More than quarter of the patients required repeated biopsy in the MENA Region. Image guided biopsy has the highest initial yield. Implementing clear process and multidisciplinary guidelines about the selection of diagnostic procedures is needed.

[Targeted therapies: towards a new toxicology?]

Targeted therapies (TT) represent since 10 years, an interesting progress in oncology for many cancers in adjuvant, neoadjuvant or palliative situation. The development of this new class of drugs, with an original mechanism of action, their easy administration, mainly per os, and a particular toxicity profile different from "classical" chemotherapy (CT) leads them entering in the therapeutic arsenal of breast, digestive tract, lung and hematologic cancers, in association with CT. Medical oncologists took rapidly the train of TT, managing a new and original skin, digestive, cardiovascular, endocrine and pulmonary toxicity profile, that remains relatively less important than "classical" CT.

Results at 5 years of intra vesical gemcitabine (G) single agent as adjuvant chemotheray in superficial transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) of the bladder

e16087

Background: Systemic intravenous gemcitabine is usually used in advanced bladder carcinoma, intravesical G is a novel treatment approach for TCC. In this study we evaluate the efficacy of intravesical Gemcitabine in patients (pts) with superficial bladder carcinoma. Methods: From February 2003 to June 2004, 60 pts (57M/3F) were enrolled in the study (M/F = 57/3). The median age was 59,5 years old (24–84). Nine pts had a carcinoma in situ (Cis) and 51 had pT1 lesions. Three weeks after a total transurethral resection (TUR), patients receive intravesical instillation of 2000 mg G every week for 6 weeks, than every month for six months. They received a total of 720 instillations, Follow up was with cystoscopy and urine cytology every six months. Results: At a median follow-up time 60 months, all patients were evaluable for tumor response: 23(38, 3%) patient had a persistant complete remission after treatment, 26 patients (43,3%) had a superficial relapse of TCC, six patients (10%) had progressive disease: four with muscle invasion and two with distant metastasis. Conclusions: Intravesical therapy with gemcitabine is active and well tolerated treatment in patients with superficial TCC carcinoma of the bladder. A phase III trial comparing GEM with intravesical BCG or MMC is warranted

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Intra vesical gemcitabine (G) single agent as adjuvant chemotherapy in superficial transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) of the bladder: Final results

5078

Background: Systemic intravenous G is usually used in advanced bladder carcinoma. A phase I study of intravesical G has shown safety profile in pts refractory to BCG therapy (Dalbani G et al JCO 2002; 20:3193–98). In this study we evaluate the toxicity and the efficacy of intravesical G in patients (pts) with superficial bladder carcinoma. Methods: The study population criteria were: age = 18 years old, histological diagnosis of transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) of bladder (Cis and pT1) confirmed by transurethral resection (TUR), no prior chemotherapy, a performance status (PS) < 2, good bone marrow reserve, adequate renal and liver function and informed consent. Three weeks after a total TUR, pts receive intravesical instillation of 2,000 mg G every wk for 6 wks, than every month for six months. Evaluation is performed 3–4 wks after the last instillation (CT scan and/or US pelvis, urinary cytology and cystoscopy with biopsy). Results: From February 2003 to June 2004, 60 pts (57M/3F) were enrolled in the study (M/F = 57/3). The median age was 59,5 years old (24–84). Nine pts had a carcinoma in situ (Cis) and 51 had pT1 lesions. They received a total of 720 instillations. All pts were evaluable for toxicity and response Toxicity (CTC/NCI scale) is evaluated over the 720 instillations. Non haematological toxicity was grade 1: irritate bladder reaction (4.7%), asthenia (2.9%), nausea and vomiting (1.8%) and hot flashes (2%). Grade 1 haematological toxicity: anaemia (6.8%), leucopenia (4.5%) and thrombocytopenia (0.4%). After a follow-up time of 30 to 48 months, all pts were evaluable for tumor response: 53 patient had a persistant complete remission after TUR. Five patients (8.3%) had a superficial relapse of TCC (one at six months, 2 at 9 months and 2 others at 12 months). Two patients had progressive disease at 18 months and 27 months. Conclusion: Intravesical G is an active and well tolerated treatment even after repeated instillation in pts with superficial TCC carcinoma of the bladder.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.