The impact of timing of intravenous iron supplementation on preoperative haemoglobin in patients scheduled for major surgery

BACKGROUND

Anaemia is frequent and an independent risk factor for morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing surgery. Iron deficiency (ID) is the main cause for anaemia and can be corrected by intravenous (IV) iron. The aim of this study was to investigate the timing of preoperative IV iron supplementation on preoperative haemoglobin (Hb) level.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Surgical patients were screened for the presence of anaemia and ID from November 2015 to January 2020. In case of ID or iron deficiency anaemia (IDA), patients received IV iron supplementation. The timing of IV iron supplementation on preoperative Hb level was analysed by days and time frames clustered by 5 days before surgery.

RESULTS

In total, 404 patients with IV iron supplementation were analysed. In all patients, IV iron was administered with a median (interquartile range [IQR]) of 3.0 (1.0; 9.0) days before surgery. Preoperative Hb level increased steadily starting from 6 days (0.13 [±1.2] g/dL) until 16 days before surgery (1.75 [±1.1] g/dL). Group comparison revealed a median preoperative Hb change of -0.2 (-0.5; 0.2) g/dL for days 1-5, 0.2 (0.0; 0.7) g/dL for days 6-10, 0.7 (0.2; 1.1) g/dL for days 11-15, 0.7 (0.2; 1.8) g/dL for days 16-20, 0.9 (0.3; 1.7) g/dL for days 21-25, 1.5 (0.4; 2.6) g/dL for days 26-30, and 0.6 (0.0; 1.7) g/dL for >31 days. Three patients received multiple administrations of IV iron which resulted in an increase in Hb of >4 g/dL.

DISCUSSION

Supplementation of IV iron to increase Hb concentration preoperatively may be most effective if administered at least ten days before surgery.

Health economics of Patient Blood Management: a cost-benefit analysis based on a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Patient Blood Management (PBM) is the timely application of evidence-based medical and surgical concepts designed to improve haemoglobin concentration, optimize haemostasis and minimize blood loss in an effort to improve patient outcomes. The focus of this cost-benefit analysis is to analyse the economic benefit of widespread implementation of a multimodal PBM programme.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Based on a recent meta-analysis including 17 studies (>235 000 patients) comparing PBM with control care and data from the University Hospital Frankfurt, a cost-benefit analysis was performed. Outcome data were red blood cell (RBC) transfusion rate, number of transfused RBC units, and length of hospital stay (LOS). Costs were considered for the following three PBM interventions as examples: anaemia management including therapy of iron deficiency, use of cell salvage and tranexamic acid. For sensitivity analysis, a Monte Carlo simulation was performed.

RESULTS

Iron supplementation was applied in 3·1%, cell salvage in 65% and tranexamic acid in 89% of the PBM patients. In total, applying these three PBM interventions costs €129·04 per patient. However, PBM was associated with a reduction in transfusion rate, transfused RBC units per patient, and LOS which yielded to mean savings of €150·64 per patient. Thus, the overall benefit of PBM implementation was €21·60 per patient. In the Monte Carlo simulation, the cost savings on the outcome side exceeded the PBM costs in approximately 2/3 of all repetitions and the total benefit was €1 878 000 in 100·000 simulated patients.

CONCLUSION

Resources to implement a multimodal PBM concept optimizing patient care and safety can be cost-effectively.