Does the severity of untreated dental caries of preschool children influence the oral health-related quality of life?

AIM

To assess the impact of untreated dental caries and its severity on the oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) of Kuwaiti preschool children and their caregivers.

METHODS

Participants were 4- and 5-year-old kindergarten children attending preselected public schools from one of the Governorates in Kuwait. Early childhood caries (ECC) was evaluated by clinical examinations and presented using decayed, missed, filled teeth/surface (dmft/dmfs). The clinical consequences of untreated dental caries were assessed using the pufa (pulp, ulcers, fistula, abscess) index for primary teeth. A structured questionnaire obtained demographic information of children and their caregivers. OHRQoL was assessed using the Arabic version of Early Childhood Oral Health Impact Scale (A-ECOHIS).

RESULTS

Among the 334 participants, 171 were kindergarten level-1 (KG1), and 163 were level-2 (KG2). The overall prevalence of dental caries was 78.9% for KG1 children and 67.4% for KG2 children. Decayed teeth were the main component for both dmft (84%) and dmfs (68%). The total mean (SD) pufa score was 0.54 (1.5), and about 19.2% of participants had at least one tooth with pufa > 0. A total of 207 A-ECOHIS were completed. Both family and child impact scores were significantly higher for children with a dmft score of 1 or more (p < 0.001) or with one or more pufa (p < 0.001). Child impact section scores were significantly higher with the increasing degrees of untreated caries (dt) (p = 0.004).

CONCLUSION

The severity of untreated dental caries and caries experience had a negative impact on the OHRQoL of Kuwaiti preschool children and their families. Using the pufa index had provided additional information about the effect of the caries severity on the OHRQoL than assessing the caries experience alone.

Acute Pancreatitis (AP) in Pregnancy and Its Complications From an Anesthesia Perspective: A Case Report

Acute pancreatitis (AP) is a rare event in pregnancy that is characterized by a sudden and severe inflammation of the pancreas. The clinical manifestation of AP during pregnancy is highly variable ranging from a mild form to a severe and potentially life-threatening presentation. We share a case of a 29-year-old female (gravida II, para I) who presented in her 33rd gestational week. The patient complained of upper abdominal pain and nausea. Her previous history revealed that she had four episodes of vomiting (food-containing, non-projectile) at home. Her uterine tone was normal, and her cervix was closed. Her white blood cell count was 13,000/mm3, and her C-reactive protein (CRP) level was 65 mg/L. She underwent an emergency laparotomy due to suspected acute appendicitis; however, no peritonitis was found intraoperatively. Further blood tests showed high levels of triglyceride at 87.5 mmol/L. The electrophoretic pattern of lipoprotein was consistent with type V hyperlipoproteinemia. An abdominal computed tomography (CT) confirmed the diagnosis of acute pancreatitis. During follow-up after one month, the patient showed triglyceride levels at 4.75 mmol/L and cholesterol at 6.07 mmol/L. Acute pancreatitis due to hypertriglyceridemia is a rare finding; nonetheless, it should be considered as a potential etiology in pregnant patients with nonobstructive abdominal pain.

Intraoperative Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair and Its Complications From an Anesthesia Perspective: A Case Report

An abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is a disease characterized by an abnormal bulge or swelling in the aorta. It could be serious if left unobserved, and with time, it swells and eventually ruptures, resulting in massive bleeding inside, and, more likely, causes death. This report presents a case study of a 61-year-old male who presented with back pain; no other fatal symptoms such as breathlessness or rapid heart rate were seen. His abdominal ultrasound report showed the presence of a distal aortic dissecting aneurysm, resulting in rapid diagnosis and treatment.

Adherence to the Antibiotic Prophylaxis Guidelines for Appendectomy in Bahrain: An Observational Study

Background Appendicitis is a common clinical problem that has multifactorial etiologies. Accounting for almost 1 million hospital days per year, it poses serious health hazards. If not treated on time, it may burst. Surgical intervention is the best option in such cases. Prophylactic use of antibiotics has been shown to reduce post-operative infections. Methodology This prospective observational study aimed to evaluate the adherence to the antibiotic prophylaxis guidelines for appendectomy in patients admitted to the surgical department at Salmanyia Medical Complex in Bahrain from January to August 2020. From the electronic records of these patients, information was extracted and evaluated regarding demographic data, the type of antibiotics given for prophylaxis, the timing of the administration of the antibiotics, and any alternative antibiotic given based on local hospital guidelines. Results The current study revealed that the majority of the patients (98%, N=273) admitted to the Salmanyia Medical Complex, Bahrain, were not administered the antibiotics within the prescribed time (30-60 minutes) as per hospital guidelines. Also, the antibiotics administered for prophylaxis prior to the appendectomy procedure were not according to the guidelines, i.e., Cefazolin 1g with Metronidazole 500 mg. Out of a total of 278 patients included in the study, none were administered the right choice as provided by the local guidelines. Second, 1.8% of patients (5 out of 278) were not administered any antibiotics for prophylaxis prior to the surgical procedure for appendicitis. Conclusion The study concluded that most patients were not administered antibiotics according to the local guidelines of the hospital.

Effect of Lactobacillus rhamnosus and Bifidobacterium lactis on gingival health, dental plaque, and periodontopathogens in adolescents: a randomised placebo-controlled clinical trial

To determine the effect of a probiotic combination of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG (LGG) and Bifidobacterium lactis BB-12 on the gingival health, dental plaque accumulation, and the oral carriage of four putative periodontal pathogens in healthy adolescents. 108 schoolboys, aged 13-15 years, participated in this study. They were divided into two groups: probiotics (n=54) and placebo (n=54). Both groups received two probiotic-laced or placebo lozenges twice a day during a four-week period. Plaque Index (PI) and Gingival Index (GI) were recorded at baseline and after four weeks. Salivary and plaque carriage of Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans, Porphyromonas gingivalis, Prevotella intermedia, Fusobacterium nucleatum were also monitored likewise. 101 subjects completed the study. A statistically significant reduction in GI was seen in the probiotic group as compared to the placebo group (P=0.012). A reduction in PI was found for both groups, with no difference observed between the groups after intervention (P=0.819). Probiotic lozenges significantly reduced levels of A. actinomycetemcomitans and F. nucleatum in saliva and plaque (P<0.05) and levels of P. gingivalis in plaque (P<0.05), while no significant changes were found in the control group. A significant reduction (P<0.001) was also noted in the total salivary bacterial counts of the test group. The short-term daily consumption of LGG and BB-12 probiotic lozenges improved the gingival health in adolescents and decreased the microbial counts of A. actinomycetemcomitans, and P. gingivalis. Hence probiotic supplements may serve as a simple adjunct to standard oral care for promoting the oral health in adolescents.