The impact of state paid sick leave policies on weekday workplace mobility during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Public Health 2023;
215:118-123. [PMID:
36689910 PMCID:
PMC9464594 DOI:
10.1016/j.puhe.2022.08.019]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2022] [Revised: 08/12/2022] [Accepted: 08/26/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES
This study aimed to evaluate whether the Families First Coronavirus Response Act (FFCRA) modified the association between pre-existing state paid sick leave (PSL) and weekday workplace mobility between February 15 and July 7, 2020.
STUDY DESIGN
This was a longitudinal, observational study.
METHODS
The 50 US states and Washington, D.C., were divided into exposure groups based on the presence or absence of pre-existing state PSL policies. Derived from Google COVID-19 Community Mobility Reports, the outcome was measured as the daily percent change in weekday workplace mobility. Mixed-effects, interrupted time series regression was performed to evaluate weekday workplace mobility after the implementation of the FFCRA on April 1, 2020.
RESULTS
States with pre-existing PSL policies exhibited a greater drop in mobility following the passage of the FFCRA (β = -8.86, 95% confidence interval: -11.6, -6.10, P < 001). This remained significant after adjusting for state-level health, economic, and sociodemographic indicators (β = -3.13, 95% confidence interval: -5.92, -0.34; P = .039).
CONCLUSIONS
Pre-existing PSL policies were associated with a significant decline in weekday workplace mobility after the FFCRA, which may have influenced local health outcomes. The presence of pre-existing state policies may differentially influence the impact of federal legislation enacted during emergencies.
Collapse