Evaluation of Conventional Cardiovascular Risk Factors and Ordinal Coronary Artery Calcium Scoring in a Lung Cancer Screening Cohort

(1) Background: Lung cancer screening (LCS) consists of low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) results to reduce lung cancer-related mortality. The LCS program has a unique opportunity to impact CVD mortality by providing tools for CVD risk assessment and implementing preventative strategies. In this study, we estimated standardized CVD risk (SCORE) and assessed the prevalence of coronary artery calcium (CAC) in a Polish LCS cohort. (2) Methods: In this observational study, 494 LCS participants aged 50-79 years with a cigarette smoking history of at least 30 pack-years were included. Medical history, anthropometric measurements, blood pressure measurements, serum glucose, and cholesterol levels were assessed in one visit. CVD risk assessment using SCORE tables was performed. The results were compared to the general population (NATPOL 2011 study). On LDCT scans, CAC was classified using an Ordinal Score ranging from 0 to 12. (3) Results: The prevalence of classic cardiovascular risk factors was very high. Among study participants, 83.7% of men and 40.7% of women were classified with a very high CVD SCORE risk (>10%). CAC was reported in 190 (47%) participants. Calcification was categorized as severe (CAC ≥ 4) in 84 (21%) participants. (4) Conclusions: Due to the high cardiovascular risk, intensive preventive strategies are recommended for LCS participants.

The prevalence of dyspnea in the adult Polish population

OBJECTIVES

Dyspnea is one of the most predominant symptom in clinical practice. There is a lack of data about incidents of dyspnea among Polish adults therefore it would be important to establish prevalence of this symptom before COVID-19 pandemic to assess the impact of this infection on the functioning of the adult Polish population in the future. The aim of the study was to establish prevalence of dyspnea in adult Polish population.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

It was an observational-cross-sectional study, with representative sample of adult Poles aged 18-79 years. The 2413 participants were surveyed. Responders were asked if and when dyspnea occurs and what is its severity in relation to 1 of 4 categories (A, B, C, and D) describing the impact of dyspnea on reduced exercise tolerance and daily activities.

RESULTS

The 67.1% of the respondents answered negatively to all question about experiencing dyspnea (females (F) 61% vs. males (M) 74%, p < 0.05). Dyspnea only during intense physical exertion (A), was reported by 22.8% (F 26.2% vs. M 19.2%, p = 0.07). Dyspnea limiting daily activities (B, C and D) was reported by 10.1% (F 13.1% vs. M 7%, p < 0.05). Significant differences in the severity of dyspnea were found between the age groups. People diagnosed with chronic heart failure or lung diseases significantly more often reported dyspnea than people without these conditions.

CONCLUSIONS

Every tenth Pole reported dyspnea limiting performing activities of daily living. Additionally, about 20% of Poles experienced dyspnea considered as "gray area," only during intense physical exertion, that requires deepening and clarifying the medical history. Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2022;35(6):747-52.

Ordinal scoring of coronary artery calcification in low dose computed tomography is predictive factor of all-cause death and cardiovascular events

Background

Lung cancer and cardiovascular disease (CVD) are leading worldwide mortality causes firmly related to smoking. Lung cancer screening (LCS) consisted in performing low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) offers an opportunity for simultaneous coronary artery calcification (CAC) assessment.

Purpose

The study aimed to determine the usefulness of the visual assessment of CAC in the prediction of all-cause death and non-fatal cardiovascular outcomes including myocardial infarction and stroke.

Methods

The study involved 6580 participants aged 50–79 years, current or former smokers with a cigarette smoking history of at least 30 pack-years, who were qualified for lung cancer screening program performed between April 2016 and May 2018. CAC was visually scored on ungated LDCT scans in the range of 0–12 based on the length of calcification involvement in four main coronary arteries. CAC severity was categorized into groups of 0, 1–3, 4–12. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. The secondary outcome was major adverse cardiovascular events (composite of CVD death, nonfatal myocardiaI infarction, nonfatal stroke). The outcomes data were obtained by using the National Health Care Provider Registry of death and hospitalizations. The mean time of follow-up was 41.1 months (SD 8.3). Logistic regression analysis was used to determine the risk of mortality according to the CAC category adjusted for age, pack-years of cigarette smoking, and sex.

Results

The rate of all-cause death substantially increased in groups of higher CAC and it was consecutively 2.7% (89 of 3288 subjects) for a score of 0, 4.2% (66 of 1582 subjects) for a score of 1–3 and 8.3% (145 of 1742 subjects) for a score of 4–12. With the use of subjects with a CAC score of 0 as the reference group, adjusted for sex, age, and pack-years of smoking, a CAC score of at least 4 was a significant predictor of all-cause death (hazard ratio [HR], 1.89; 95% CI: 1.42; 2.52; P&lt;0.05). Similar results were observed for the composite of CVD death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke with even greater significance. The rate of secondary outcames was 1.6% (51/3276) in a 0 score cohort, 3.0% (47/1570) in a 1–3 score cohort and 7.5% (130/1732) in a 4–12 score cohort. Both CAC score in the range 1–3 ([HR], 1.57; 95% CI: 1.05; 1.2.35; P&lt;0.05), and 4–12 ([HR], 3.55; 95% CI: 2.50; 5.04; P&lt;0.05) were a significant predictors of major adverse cardiovascular event incidence.

Conclusions

Visual assessment of CAC provides solid evidence of all-cause death and cardiovascular incidents independently of traditional coronary risk factors. Therefore evaluation of CAC in LDCT scans offers a unique opportunity for instituting CVD risk assessment in lung cancer screening program.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: Public grant(s) – National budget only. Main funding source(s): National Centre for Research and Development of Poland.

Prevalence, symptom burden and under-diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in Polish lung cancer screening population: a cohort observational study

OBJECTIVES

Lung cancer screening using low-dose CT may be not effective without considering the presence of comorbidities related to chronic smoking. The aim of the study was to establish the prevalence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in group of phighlight the potential benefits atients participating in the largest Polish lung cancer screening programme MOLTEST-BIS and attempt to confirm the necessity of combined lung cancer and COPD screening.

DESIGN

Cohort, prospective study.

SETTING

Medical University of Gdańsk, Poland PARTICIPANTS: The study included 754 participants in lung cancer screening trial from the Pomeranian region, aged 50-70 years old, current and former smokers with a smoking history ≥30 pack-years.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES

Questionnaire, physical examination, anthropometric measurements, spirometry test before and after inhaled bronchodilator (400 µg of salbutamol) RESULTS: Obstructive disorders were diagnosed in 186 cases (103 male and 83 female). In the case of 144 participants (19.73%), COPD was diagnosed. Only 13.3% of participants with COPD were known about the disease earlier. According to classification of airflow limitation 55.6% of diagnosed COPD were in Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) 1 (mild), 38.9% in GOLD 2 (moderate), 4.9% in GOLD 3 (severe) and 0.7% in GOLD 4 (very severe) stage. Women with recognition of COPD were younger than men (63.7 vs 66.3 age) and they smoked less cigarettes (41.1 vs 51.9 pack-years).

CONCLUSIONS

Prevalence of COPD in Polish lung cancer screening cohort is significant. The COPD in this group is remarkably under-diagnosed. Most diagnosed COPD cases were in the initial stage of advancement. This early detection of airflow limitation highlights the potential benefits arising from combined oncological-pulmonary screening.NKBBN.