1
|
Wang Y, Abu-Sbeih H, Tang T, Shatila M, Faleck D, Harris J, Dougan M, Olsson-Brown A, Johnson DB, Shi C, Grivas P, Diamantopoulos L, Owen DH, Cassol C, Arnold CA, Warner DE, Alva A, Powell N, Ibraheim H, De Toni EN, Philipp AB, Philpott J, Sleiman J, Lythgoe M, Daniels E, Sandhu S, Weppler AM, Buckle A, Pinato DJ, Thomas A, Qiao W. Novel endoscopic scoring system for immune mediated colitis: A Multicenter Retrospective Study of 674 Patients. Gastrointest Endosc 2024:S0016-5107(24)00043-9. [PMID: 38272276 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2024.01.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2023] [Revised: 01/07/2024] [Accepted: 01/13/2024] [Indexed: 01/27/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS No endoscopic scoring system has been established for immune-mediated colitis (IMC). This study aimed to establish such a system for IMC and explore its utility in guiding future selective immunosuppressive therapy (SIT) use compared to clinical symptoms. METHODS This retrospective international 14-center study included 674 patients who developed IMC after immunotherapy and underwent endoscopic evaluation. Ten endoscopic features were selected by group consensus and assigned one point each to calculate an IMC endoscopic score (IMCES). IMCES cutoffs were chosen to maximize specificity for SIT use. This specificity was compared between IMCES, and clinical symptoms graded according to a standardized instrument. RESULTS A total of 309 (45.8%) patients received SIT. IMCES specificity for SIT use was 82.8% with a cutoff of 4 . The inclusion of ulceration as a mandatory criterion resulted in higher specificity (85.0% for a cutoff of 4). In comparison, the specificity of a Mayo Endoscopy Score (MES) of 3 was 74.6% while specificity of clinical symptom grading was much lower at 27.4% and 12.3% respectively. Early endoscopy was associated with timely SIT use (p<0.001, r=0.4084). CONCLUSIONS This is the largest, multi-center study to devise an endoscopic scoring system to guide IMC management. An IMCES cutoff 4 has a higher specificity for SIT use than clinical symptoms, supporting early endoscopic evaluation for IMC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yinghong Wang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA, 77030.
| | - Hamzah Abu-Sbeih
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA, 77030; Department of Internal Medicine, University of Missouri, Kansas City, MO, USA, 64110
| | - Tenglong Tang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA, 77030; Department of General Surgery, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Malek Shatila
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA, 77030
| | - David Faleck
- Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA, 10065
| | - Jessica Harris
- Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA, 10065
| | - Michael Dougan
- Division of Gastroenterology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA, 02114
| | | | - Douglas B Johnson
- Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA, 37235
| | - Chanjuan Shi
- Department of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA, 37235
| | - Petros Grivas
- Department of Medicine, Division of Oncology, University of Washington, Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA, 98109
| | - Leonidas Diamantopoulos
- Department of Medicine, Division of Oncology, University of Washington, Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA, 98109
| | - Dwight H Owen
- Division of Medical Oncology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA, 43210
| | - Clarissa Cassol
- Division of Renal Pathology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA, 43210
| | - Christina A Arnold
- Division of Gastrointestinal and Liver Pathology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA, 43210
| | - David E Warner
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA, 48109
| | - Ajjai Alva
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA, 48109
| | - Nick Powell
- Royal Marsden Hospital, and Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK, SE1 9RS
| | - Hajir Ibraheim
- Royal Marsden Hospital, and Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK, SE1 9RS
| | - Enrico N De Toni
- Department of Medicine II, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Alexander B Philipp
- Department of Medicine II, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Jessica Philpott
- Center for Inflammatory Bowel Disease, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA, 44195
| | - Joseph Sleiman
- Center for Inflammatory Bowel Disease, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA, 44195; Department of Gastroenterology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, 15213
| | - Mark Lythgoe
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK, SW7 2BX
| | - Ella Daniels
- Department of Oncology, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, London, UK, SW10 9NH
| | - Shahneen Sandhu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, 3000
| | - Alison M Weppler
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, 3000
| | - Andrew Buckle
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, 3000
| | - David J Pinato
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK, SW7 2BX; Division of Oncology, Department of Translational Medicine, University of Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy, 28100
| | - Anusha Thomas
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA, 77030
| | - Wei Qiao
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA, 77030
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Anzinger I, Nagel D, De Toni EN, Ofner A, Philipp AB, Holdt LM, Teupser D, Kolligs FT, Herbst A. Cell-free circulating ALU repeats in serum have a prognostic value for colorectal cancer patients. Cancer Biomark 2023:CBM210536. [PMID: 37302022 DOI: 10.3233/cbm-210536] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) is the only established serum biomarker for colorectal cancer (CRC). To facilitate therapy decisions and improve the overall survival of CRC patients, prognostic biomarkers are required. OBJECTIVE We studied the prognostic value of five different cell free circulating DNA (fcDNA) fragments. The potential markers were ALU115, ALU247, LINE1-79, LINE1-300 and ND1-mt. METHODS The copy numbers of the DNA fragments were measured in the peripheral blood serum of 268 CRC patients using qPCR, the results were compared to common and previously described markers. RESULTS We found that ALU115 and ALU247 fcDNA levels correlate significantly with several clinicopathological parameters. An increased amount of ALU115 and ALU247 fcDNA fragments coincides with methylation of HPP1 (P< 0.001; P< 0.01), which proved to be a prognostic marker itself in former studies and also with increased CEA level (P< 0.001). ALU115 and ALU247 can define patients with poor survival in UICC stage IV (Alu115: HR = 2.9; 95% Cl 1.8-4.8, P< 0.001; Alu247: HR = 2.2; 95% Cl 1.3-3.6; P= 0.001). Combining ALU115 and HPP1, the prognostic value in UICC stage IV is highly significant (P< 0.001). CONCLUSIONS This study shows that an increased level of ALU fcDNA is an independent prognostic biomarker for advanced colorectal cancer disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isabel Anzinger
- Department of Urology, St. Elisabeth Hospital, Straubing, Germany
| | - Dorothea Nagel
- Institute of Laboratory Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Ludwig Maximilians University, Munich, Germany
| | - Enrico N De Toni
- Medical Department 2, Faculty of Medicine, Ludwig Maximilians University, Munich, Germany
| | - Andrea Ofner
- Medical Department 2, Faculty of Medicine, Ludwig Maximilians University, Munich, Germany
| | - Alexander B Philipp
- Medical Department 2, Faculty of Medicine, Ludwig Maximilians University, Munich, Germany
| | - Lesca M Holdt
- Institute of Laboratory Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Ludwig Maximilians University, Munich, Germany
| | - Daniel Teupser
- Institute of Laboratory Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Ludwig Maximilians University, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Andreas Herbst
- Medical Department 2, Faculty of Medicine, Ludwig Maximilians University, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Scheiner B, Roessler D, Phen S, Lim M, Pomej K, Pressiani T, Cammarota A, Fründt TW, von Felden J, Schulze K, Himmelsbach V, Finkelmeier F, Deibel A, Siebenhüner AR, Shmanko K, Radu P, Schwacha-Eipper B, Ebert MP, Teufel A, Djanani A, Hucke F, Balcar L, Philipp AB, Hsiehchen D, Venerito M, Sinner F, Trauner M, D'Alessio A, Fulgenzi CA, Pinato DJ, Peck-Radosavljevic M, Dufour JF, Weinmann A, Kremer AE, Singal AG, De Toni EN, Rimassa L, Pinter M. Efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitor rechallenge in individuals with hepatocellular carcinoma. JHEP Rep 2022; 5:100620. [PMID: 36578451 PMCID: PMC9791167 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhepr.2022.100620] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2022] [Revised: 10/13/2022] [Accepted: 10/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
Background & Aims We investigated the efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) rechallenge in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who received ICI-based therapies in a previous systemic line. Methods In this international, retrospective multicenter study, patients with HCC who received at least two lines of ICI-based therapies (ICI-1, ICI-2) at 14 institutions were eligible. The main outcomes included best overall response and treatment-related adverse events. Results Of 994 ICI-treated patients screened, a total of 58 patients (male, n = 41; 71%) with a mean age of 65.0±9.0 years were included. Median systemic treatment lines of ICI-1 and ICI-2 were 1 (range, 1-4) and 3 (range, 2-9), respectively. ICI-based therapies used at ICI-1 and ICI-2 included ICI alone (ICI-1, n = 26, 45%; ICI-2, n = 4, 7%), dual ICI regimens (n = 1, 2%; n = 12, 21%), or ICI combined with targeted therapies/anti-VEGF (n = 31, 53%; n = 42, 72%). Most patients discontinued ICI-1 due to progression (n = 52, 90%). Objective response rate was 22% at ICI-1 and 26% at ICI-2. Responses at ICI-2 were also seen in patients who had progressive disease as best overall response at ICI-1 (n = 11/21; 52%). Median time-to-progression at ICI-1 and ICI-2 was 5.4 (95% CI 3.0-7.7) months and 5.2 (95% CI 3.3-7.0) months, respectively. Treatment-related adverse events of grade 3-4 at ICI-1 and ICI-2 were observed in 9 (16%) and 10 (17%) patients, respectively. Conclusions ICI rechallenge was safe and resulted in a treatment benefit in a meaningful proportion of patients with HCC. These data provide a rationale for investigating ICI-based regimens in patients who progressed on first-line immunotherapy in prospective trials. Impact and implications Therapeutic sequencing after first-line immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains a challenge as no available second-line treatment options have been studied in immunotherapy-pretreated patients. Particularly, the role of ICI rechallenge in patients with HCC is unclear, as data from prospective trials are lacking. We investigated the efficacy and safety of ICI-based regimens in patients with HCC pretreated with immunotherapy in a retrospective, international, multicenter study. Our data provide the rationale for prospective trials investigating the role of ICI-based regimens in patients who have progressed on first-line immunotherapy.
Collapse
Key Words
- BOR, best overall response
- CR, complete response
- DCR, disease control rate
- HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma
- ICI, immune checkpoint inhibitor
- Immune checkpoint blocker
- Immunotherapy
- Liver cancer
- NE, not evaluable
- ORR, objective response rate
- OS, overall survival
- PD, progressive disease
- PR, partial response
- SD, stable disease
- Systemic therapy
- TRAEs, treatment-related adverse events
- TTP, time-to-progression
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bernhard Scheiner
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria,Liver Cancer (HCC) Study Group Vienna, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Daniel Roessler
- Department of Medicine II, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, 81377, Germany
| | - Samuel Phen
- Department of Medicine, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas TX, USA
| | - Mir Lim
- Department of Medicine, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas TX, USA
| | - Katharina Pomej
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria,Liver Cancer (HCC) Study Group Vienna, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Tiziana Pressiani
- Medical Oncology and Hematology Unit, Humanitas Cancer Center, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, 20089 Rozzano (Milan), Italy
| | - Antonella Cammarota
- Medical Oncology and Hematology Unit, Humanitas Cancer Center, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, 20089 Rozzano (Milan), Italy,Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Via Rita Levi Montalcini 4, 20072 Pieve Emanuele (Milan), Italy
| | - Thorben W. Fründt
- 1. Department of Internal Medicine, Gastroenterology & Hepatology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Johann von Felden
- 1. Department of Internal Medicine, Gastroenterology & Hepatology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Kornelius Schulze
- 1. Department of Internal Medicine, Gastroenterology & Hepatology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Vera Himmelsbach
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endocrinology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt/Main, Germany
| | - Fabian Finkelmeier
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endocrinology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt/Main, Germany
| | - Ansgar Deibel
- Department of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, University Hospital Zurich and University Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Alexander R. Siebenhüner
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital Zurich and University Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland,Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Cantonal Hospital Schaffhausen, Schaffhausen, Switzerland
| | - Kateryna Shmanko
- Department of Internal Medicine I, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Pompilia Radu
- Hepatology-Department of Biomedical Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland,Department of Visceral Surgery and Medicine, Inselspital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Birgit Schwacha-Eipper
- Department of Visceral Surgery and Medicine, Inselspital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Matthias P. Ebert
- Department of Internal Medicine II, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany,Clinical Cooperation Unit Healthy Metabolism, Center for Preventive Medicine and Digital Health Baden-Württemberg (CPDBW), Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany,DKFZ-Hector Cancer Institute at University Medical Center Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Andreas Teufel
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Healthy Metabolism, Center for Preventive Medicine and Digital Health Baden-Württemberg (CPDBW), Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany,Department of Internal Medicine II, Division of Hepatology, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Angela Djanani
- Department of Internal Medicine I, Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, Endocrinology and Metabolism, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Florian Hucke
- Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology (IMuG), Including Centralized Emergency Service (ZAE), Klinikum Klagenfurt am Wörthersee, Klagenfurt, Austria
| | - Lorenz Balcar
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria,Liver Cancer (HCC) Study Group Vienna, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Alexander B. Philipp
- Department of Medicine II, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, 81377, Germany
| | - David Hsiehchen
- Department of Medicine, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas TX, USA
| | - Marino Venerito
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Infectious Diseases, Otto-Von Guericke University Hospital, 39120 Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Friedrich Sinner
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Infectious Diseases, Otto-Von Guericke University Hospital, 39120 Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Michael Trauner
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Antonio D'Alessio
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Via Rita Levi Montalcini 4, 20072 Pieve Emanuele (Milan), Italy,Department of Surgery & Cancer, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK
| | - Claudia A.M. Fulgenzi
- Department of Surgery & Cancer, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK,Department of Medical Oncology, University Campus Bio-Medico of Rome, Italy
| | - David J. Pinato
- Department of Surgery & Cancer, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK,Division of Oncology, Department of Translational Medicine, University of Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy
| | - Markus Peck-Radosavljevic
- Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology (IMuG), Including Centralized Emergency Service (ZAE), Klinikum Klagenfurt am Wörthersee, Klagenfurt, Austria
| | - Jean-François Dufour
- Hepatology-Department of Biomedical Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Arndt Weinmann
- Department of Internal Medicine I, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Andreas E. Kremer
- Department of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, University Hospital Zurich and University Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland,Department of Medicine 1, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Amit G. Singal
- Department of Medicine, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas TX, USA
| | - Enrico N. De Toni
- Department of Medicine II, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, 81377, Germany
| | - Lorenza Rimassa
- Medical Oncology and Hematology Unit, Humanitas Cancer Center, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, 20089 Rozzano (Milan), Italy,Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Via Rita Levi Montalcini 4, 20072 Pieve Emanuele (Milan), Italy
| | - Matthias Pinter
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria,Liver Cancer (HCC) Study Group Vienna, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria,Corresponding author. Address: Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria. Tel.: +43 1 40400 47440, fax: +43 1 40400 47350.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Roessler D, Öcal O, Philipp AB, Markwardt D, Munker S, Mayerle J, Jochheim LS, Hammer K, Lange CM, Geier A, Seidensticker M, Reiter FP, De Toni EN, Ben Khaled N. Ipilimumab and nivolumab in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma after failure of prior immune checkpoint inhibitor-based combination therapies: a multicenter retrospective study. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2022:10.1007/s00432-022-04206-8. [PMID: 35864269 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-022-04206-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2022] [Accepted: 07/09/2022] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based regimens are transforming the landscape of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treatment. We describe the effect of combined ipilimumab and nivolumab in patients with advanced HCC after the failure of prior ICI-based combination treatments. METHODS The clinical course of patients with advanced HCC who received combined ipilimumab and nivolumab after prior ICI-based combination therapies was assessed. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) per RECIST v1.1 and mRECIST, overall survival (OS), and safety were analyzed. RESULTS Of 109 patients treated with atezolizumab and bevacizumab or other ICI-based combination treatments, ten patients received subsequent therapy with ipilimumab and nivolumab. The majority of patients had Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) Stage C (80%) HCC and a preserved liver function as defined by Child-Pugh A (80%). At a median follow-up of 15.3 months, ORR for ipilimumab and nivolumab was 30% with a DCR of 40%. Median PFS was 2.9 months and the median OS was 7.4 months. CONCLUSION This retrospective study demonstrates that combined ipilimumab and nivolumab can be effective and tolerable after prior ICI-based combination therapies and provides a rationale for the prospective clinical evaluation of this treatment sequencing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Roessler
- Department of Medicine II, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377, Munich, Bavaria, Germany. .,Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), Partner site Munich, Munich, Germany.
| | - Osman Öcal
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Alexander B Philipp
- Department of Medicine II, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377, Munich, Bavaria, Germany
| | - Daniel Markwardt
- Department of Medicine II, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377, Munich, Bavaria, Germany
| | - Stefan Munker
- Department of Medicine II, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377, Munich, Bavaria, Germany
| | - Julia Mayerle
- Department of Medicine II, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377, Munich, Bavaria, Germany.,Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), Partner site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Leonie S Jochheim
- Department for Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Duisburg, Germany
| | - Katharina Hammer
- Department of Medicine II, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377, Munich, Bavaria, Germany
| | - Christian M Lange
- Department of Medicine II, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377, Munich, Bavaria, Germany.,Department for Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Duisburg, Germany
| | - Andreas Geier
- Division of Hepatology, Department of Medicine II, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Max Seidensticker
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Florian P Reiter
- Division of Hepatology, Department of Medicine II, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Enrico N De Toni
- Department of Medicine II, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377, Munich, Bavaria, Germany
| | - Najib Ben Khaled
- Department of Medicine II, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377, Munich, Bavaria, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner site Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Bauer U, Gerum S, Roeder F, Münch S, Combs SE, Philipp AB, De Toni EN, Kirstein MM, Vogel A, Mogler C, Haller B, Neumann J, Braren RF, Makowski MR, Paprottka P, Guba M, Geisler F, Schmid RM, Umgelter A, Ehmer U. High rate of complete histopathological response in hepatocellular carcinoma patients after combined transarterial chemoembolization and stereotactic body radiation therapy. World J Gastroenterol 2021; 27:3630-3642. [PMID: 34239274 PMCID: PMC8240047 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v27.i24.3630] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2021] [Revised: 03/20/2021] [Accepted: 05/18/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Liver transplantation (LT) presents a curative treatment option in patients with early stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who are not eligible for resection or ablation therapy. Due to a risk of up 30% for waitlist drop-out upon tumor progression, bridging therapies are used to halt tumor growth. Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and less commonly stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) or a combination of TACE and SBRT, are used as bridging therapies in LT. However, it remains unclear if one of those treatment options is superior. The analysis of explant livers after transplantation provides the unique opportunity to investigate treatment response by histopathology.
AIM To analyze histopathological response to a combination of TACE and SBRT in HCC in comparison to TACE or SBRT alone.
METHODS In this multicenter retrospective study, 27 patients who received liver transplantation for HCC were analyzed. Patients received either TACE or SBRT alone, or a combination of TACE and SBRT as bridging therapy to liver transplantation. Liver explants of all patients who received at least one TACE and/or SBRT were analyzed for the presence of residual vital tumor tissue by histopathology to assess differences in treatment response to bridging therapies. Statistical analysis was performed using Fisher-Freeman-Halton exact test, Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney-U tests.
RESULTS Fourteen patients received TACE only, four patients SBRT only, and nine patients a combination therapy of TACE and SBRT. There were no significant differences between groups regarding age, sex, etiology of underlying liver disease or number and size of tumor lesions. Strikingly, analysis of liver explants revealed that almost all patients in the TACE and SBRT combination group (8/9, 89%) showed no residual vital tumor tissue by histopathology, whereas TACE or SBRT alone resulted in significantly lower rates of complete histopathological response (0/14, 0% and 1/4, 25%, respectively, P value < 0.001).
CONCLUSION Our data suggests that a combination of TACE and SBRT increases the rate of complete histopathological response compared to TACE or SBRT alone in bridging to liver transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ulrike Bauer
- Internal Medicine II, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich 81675, Germany
| | - Sabine Gerum
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, University of Salzburg, Salzburg 5020, Austria
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Munich, Campus Großhadern, LMU Munich, Munich 81377, Germany
| | - Falk Roeder
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, University of Salzburg, Salzburg 5020, Austria
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Munich, Campus Großhadern, LMU Munich, Munich 81377, Germany
| | - Stefan Münch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich 81675, Germany
| | - Stephanie E Combs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich 81675, Germany
| | - Alexander B Philipp
- Department of Medicine II, Liver Centre, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich 81377, Germany
| | - Enrico N De Toni
- Department of Medicine II, Liver Centre, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich 81377, Germany
| | - Martha M Kirstein
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endocrinology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover 30625, Germany
| | - Arndt Vogel
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endocrinology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover 30625, Germany
| | - Carolin Mogler
- Institute of Pathology, Technical University of Munich, Munich 81675, Germany
| | - Bernhard Haller
- Institute of Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemiology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich 81675, Germany
| | - Jens Neumann
- Institute of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital of Munich, Munich 81377, Germany
| | - Rickmer F Braren
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich 81675, Germany
| | - Marcus R Makowski
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich 81675, Germany
| | - Philipp Paprottka
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Section for Interventional Radiology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich 81675, Germany
| | - Markus Guba
- Department of General-, Visceral-, Vascular- and Transplant-Surgery, University hospital of Munich, Campus Großhadern, LMU Munich, Munich 81377, Germany
| | - Fabian Geisler
- Internal Medicine II, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich 81675, Germany
| | - Roland M Schmid
- Internal Medicine II, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich 81675, Germany
| | - Andreas Umgelter
- Internal Medicine II, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich 81675, Germany
- Emergency Department, Vivantes hospital group, Humboldt hospital, Berlin 13509, Germany
| | - Ursula Ehmer
- Internal Medicine II, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich 81675, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Abu-Sbeih H, Tang T, Faleck DM, Dougan ML, Olsson-Brown A, Johnson DB, Owen DH, Warner DE, Philipp AB, Powell N, Daniels E, Philpott J, Weppler AM, Pinato DJ, Wang Y. Outcomes of immune checkpoint inhibitor-mediated colitis: Multicenter cohort study. J Clin Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2021.39.15_suppl.2643] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
2643 Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-mediated colitis (IMC) is a common and serious adverse event. Although small series have described the clinical presentation of IMC, large multicenter series that integrate clinical, endoscopic, and histologic findings are lacking. Methods: We retrospectively assessed patients who received ICI and had endoscopically confirmed IMC from 2010 to 2019. IMC was graded based on the CTCAE version 5.0 criteria. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to assess factors associated with recurrence of IMC symptoms and long duration of corticosteroids use (> 70 days). Results: 675 patients were included. 387 patients were males (57%). Median age was 63 years. Melanoma was the most common cancer type (327; 48%). Most (365; 54%) patients received CTLA-4 inhibitor ICI, as monotherapy or in combination with PD-(L)1. Median time from ICI therapy to IMC was 62 days. IMC was grade 2 in 335 (50%) patients, Grade 3 in 181 (27%), and grade 4 in 16 (3%). 155 (23%) patients had mucosal ulceration on endoscopy, 91 of them had severe features (deep, large, or multiple ulcers); 336 (50%) patients had non-ulcerative inflammation. The rest had normal endoscopic findings with histologic inflammation. Most patients were admitted to the hospital for management of IMC (405; 60%) and 16 (3%) needed ICU-level of care. Treatment included corticosteroids in 577 (85%) patients (median duration 52 days), TNF inhibitor in 245 (36%), and vedolizumab in 90 (13%). 202 (32%) patients had recurrent IMC after resolution of symptoms. On multivariate logistic regression, factors associated with IMC recurrence and long (> 70 days) duration of corticosteroid therapy were grade of IMC ( p = 0.049), treatment with infliximab or vedolizumab ( p = 0.044), presence of mucosal ulceration ( p = 0.034 ), or features of active histologic inflammation ( p = 0.076). Of note, patients with mucosal ulceration received infliximab or vedolizumab more frequently ( p < 0.001). For patients with grade 2 IMC, mucosal inflammation on endoscopy and delay in performing endoscopy with time from IMC onset to endoscopy more than a month were associated with IMC recurrence and longer duration of corticosteroid use ( p = 0.029 and p < 0.001, respectively). 16 (3%) patients had colonic perforation, 7 of them underwent surgical resection. No IMC-related death occurred. Conclusions: IMC is a clinically significant adverse event that can lead to premature termination of ICI therapy with high rates of hospital admission. Rarely, it results in colonic perforation requiring surgical intervention and ICU admission. Our data suggest that there is a utility of endoscopic and histologic evaluation in the prediction of worse outcomes from IMC. This finding is particularly important for grade 2 IMC as current guidelines do not recommend endoscopic evaluation for this group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Tenglong Tang
- The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | | | | | | | | | - Dwight Hall Owen
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
| | | | | | - Nick Powell
- Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Ella Daniels
- Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, Chelsa, United Kingdom
| | | | | | - David James Pinato
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College, London, United Kingdom
| | - Yinghong Wang
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kaiser RWJ, Allgeier J, Philipp AB, Mayerle J, Rothe C, Wallrauch C, Op den Winkel M. Development of amoebic liver abscess in early pregnancy years after initial amoebic exposure: a case report. BMC Gastroenterol 2020; 20:424. [PMID: 33317457 PMCID: PMC7734812 DOI: 10.1186/s12876-020-01567-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2020] [Accepted: 12/01/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Infection with Entamoeba histolytica and associated complications are relatively rare in developed countries. The overall low prevalence in the Western world as well as the possibly prolonged latency period between infection with the causing pathogen and onset of clinical symptoms may delay diagnosis of and adequate treatment for amoebiasis. Amoebic liver abscess (ALA) is the most common extraintestinal manifestation of invasive amoebiasis. Pregnancy has been described as a risk factor for development of invasive amoebiasis and management of these patients is especially complex. CASE PRESENTATION A 30-year-old Caucasian woman in early pregnancy presented to our emergency department with abdominal pain alongside elevated inflammatory markers and liver function tests. Travel history revealed multiple journeys to tropic and subtropic regions during the past decade and a prolonged episode of intermittently bloody diarrhea during a five month stay in Indonesia seven years prior to admission. Sonographic and magnetic resonance imaging revealed a 5 × 4 cm hepatic abscess. After ultrasound-guided transcutaneous liver drainage, both abscess fluids and blood cultures showed neither bacterial growth nor microscopic signs of parasitic disease. Serological testing confirmed an infection with Entamoeba histolytica, which was treated with metronidazole, followed by eradication therapy with paromomycin. Subsequent clinical, laboratory and imaging follow-up exams showed regression of the ALA. In addition, the pregnancy completed without complications and a healthy baby boy was born 7 months after termination of treatment. CONCLUSIONS This case of invasive amoebiasis in early pregnancy outside of endemic regions and several years after exposure demonstrates the importance of broad differential diagnostics in the context of liver abscesses. The complex interdisciplinary decisions regarding the choice of imaging techniques as well as interventional and antibiotic therapy in the context of pregnancy are discussed. Furthermore, we present possible explanations for pregnancy as a risk factor for an invasive course of amoebiasis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rainer W J Kaiser
- Department of Medicine I, LMU Klinikum, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany. .,DZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research), Partner Site Munich Heart Alliance, Munich, Germany.
| | - Julian Allgeier
- Department of Medicine II, LMU Klinikum, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany
| | - Alexander B Philipp
- Department of Medicine II, LMU Klinikum, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany
| | - Julia Mayerle
- Department of Medicine II, LMU Klinikum, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany
| | - Camilla Rothe
- Department of Tropical Medicine, LMU Klinikum, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany
| | - Claudia Wallrauch
- Department of Tropical Medicine, LMU Klinikum, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany
| | - Mark Op den Winkel
- Department of Medicine II, LMU Klinikum, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
De Toni EN, Nagel D, Philipp AB, Herbst A, Thalhammer I, Mayerle J, Török HP, Brandl L, Kolligs FT. Correlation Between Baseline Osteoprotegerin Serum Levels and Prognosis of Advanced-Stage Colorectal Cancer Patients. Cell Physiol Biochem 2018; 45:605-613. [PMID: 29402836 DOI: 10.1159/000487101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2017] [Accepted: 11/18/2017] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIMS Osteoprotegerin (OPG) is a soluble receptor of the pro-apoptotic cytokine TRAIL which is thought to contribute to tumour development by inhibiting apoptosis or affecting other aspects of tumour biology, including cell proliferation and immune response. Although immunohistochemical studies suggest that OPG correlates with survival in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), only scarce data are available on serum OPG in CRC patients. METHODS In this pilot study, we assessed the prognostic significance of serum OPG and CEA (Carcinoembryonic antigen) in 81 patients with UICC (Union for International Cancer Control) stage-IV mCRC. OPG was additionally assessed by immunohistochemistry in primary tissue samples from 33 patients of the same cohort. RESULTS Baseline serum OPG correlated with CEA (r=0.36, p=0.0011), but independently predicted survival of mCRC patients. Life expectancy was poorer in patients with OPG levels above the median concentration of 51ng/ml (median overall survival [95% confidence interval] 1.8 years [1.3-3.0] vs. 1.0 [0.7-1.2] p=0.013). Patients with high levels of both OPG and CEA had an even poorer life expectancy vs. low-OPG/low-CEA patients (0.9 years [0.6-1.5] vs. 3 years [1.2-4.4], p=0.015), indicating that CEA and OPG have additive prognostic significance. Immunohistochemical analysis of OPG failed to show a correlation between OPG staining and survival (p=0.055) or OPG concentration from matched serum samples. CONCLUSIONS This pilot study provides evidence of independent prognostic significance of serum OPG in patients with advanced mCRC and warrants its further prospective validation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Enrico N De Toni
- Department of Medicine II, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Dorothea Nagel
- Institute of Laboratory Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Andreas Herbst
- Institute of Laboratory Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Isabel Thalhammer
- Department of Medicine II, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Julia Mayerle
- Department of Medicine II, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Helga-Paula Török
- Department of Medicine II, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Lydia Brandl
- Institute of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Frank T Kolligs
- Department of Medicine II, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Philipp AB, Nagel D, Stieber P, Lamerz R, Thalhammer I, Herbst A, Kolligs FT. Circulating cell-free methylated DNA and lactate dehydrogenase release in colorectal cancer. BMC Cancer 2014; 14:245. [PMID: 24708595 PMCID: PMC4021086 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-14-245] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2013] [Accepted: 04/03/2014] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Hypermethylation of DNA is an epigenetic alteration commonly found in colorectal cancer (CRC) and can also be detected in blood samples of cancer patients. Methylation of the genes helicase-like transcription factor (HLTF) and hyperplastic polyposis 1 (HPP1) have been proposed as prognostic, and neurogenin 1 (NEUROG1) as diagnostic biomarker. However the underlying mechanisms leading to the release of these genes are unclear. This study aimed at examining the possible correlation of the presence of methylated genes NEUROG1, HLTF and HPP1 in serum with tissue breakdown as a possible mechanism using serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) as a surrogate marker. Additionally the prognostic impact of these markers was examined. Methods Pretherapeutic serum samples from 259 patients from all cancer stages were analyzed. Presence of hypermethylation of the genes HLTF, HPP1, and NEUROG1 was examined using methylation-specific quantitative PCR (MethyLight). LDH was determined using an UV kinetic test. Results Hypermethylation of HLTF and HPP1 was detected significantly more often in patients with elevated LDH levels (32% vs. 12% [p = 0.0005], and 68% vs. 11% [p < 0.0001], respectively). Also, higher LDH values correlated with a higher percentage of a fully methylated reference in a linear fashion (Spearman correlation coefficient 0.18 for HLTF [p = 0.004]; 0.49 [p < .0001] for HPP1). No correlation between methylation of NEUROG1 and LDH was found in this study. Concerning the clinical characteristics, high levels of LDH as well as methylation of HLTF and HPP1 were significantly associated with larger and more advanced stages of CRC. Accordingly, these three markers were correlated with significantly shorter survival in the overall population. Moreover, all three identified patients with a worse prognosis in the subgroup of stage IV patients. Conclusions We were able to provide evidence that methylation of HLTF and especially HPP1 detected in serum is strongly correlated with cell death in CRC using LDH as surrogate marker. Additionally, we found that prognostic information is given by both HLTF and HPP1 as well as LDH. In sum, determining the methylation of HLTF and HPP1 in serum might be useful in order to identify patients with more aggressive tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Frank T Kolligs
- Department of Medicine II, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Marchioninistr, 15, 81377 Munich, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Philipp AB, Stieber P, Nagel D, Neumann J, Spelsberg F, Jung A, Lamerz R, Herbst A, Kolligs FT. Prognostic role of methylated free circulating DNA in colorectal cancer. Int J Cancer 2012; 131:2308-19. [PMID: 22362391 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.27505] [Citation(s) in RCA: 75] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2011] [Accepted: 01/31/2012] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
DNA hypermethylation is frequently found in colorectal cancer (CRC). Methylation of helicase-like transcription factor (HLTF) and hyperplastic polyposis 1 (HPP1) are potential and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) is an established prognostic factor in serum of patients with CRC. The aim of this study was to perform a direct comparison of the prognostic roles of these markers. Methylation status of HLTF and HPP1 was examined in pretherapeutic sera of 311 patients with CRC and matched primary tissues of 54 stage IV patients using methylation-specific quantitative PCR. CEA was determined using an immunoenzymometric assay. Methylation of HLTF and HPP1 DNA in serum significantly correlated with tumor size, stage, grade and metastatic disease. HPP1 methylation correlated with nodal status. Overall survival was shortened in case of methylation of HLTF or HPP1 or elevated levels of CEA (p < 0.0001 for all). In stage IV, patients survival was impaired if HLTF (p = 0.0005) or HPP1 (p = 0.0003) were methylated or CEA was above the median of 27 ng/ml (p = 0.002). Multivariate analysis revealed that methylation of HLTF [hazard ratio (HR) 1.8, p = 0.0438], HPP1 (HR 1.6, p = 0.0495) and CEA >27 ng/ml (HR 1.7, p = 0.0317) were independent prognostic factors in stage IV. The combination of any two or all three of these factors outperformed each marker on its own. In conclusion, the presence of methylated DNA of the genes HLTF or HPP1 in serum are independent prognostic factors in metastasized CRC. Prospective validation is required to determine their usefulness in clinical routine along with the established marker CEA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander B Philipp
- Department of Medicine II, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|