Palliative care integration and end-of-life care intensity for patients with NSCLC

BACKGROUND

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) without oncogenic driver mutations is considered to have a poor prognosis, although recent therapeutic progress. This study aims to assess the real-life integration of palliative care (PC) and the intensity of end-of-life (EOL) care for this population.

METHODS

This was an observational cohort study of decedent patients from metastatic NSCLC without oncogenic driver mutations over the period 01/2018 to 12/2022, treated in first line with immunotherapy +/- chemotherapy. We analysed PC integration and aggressiveness criteria of EOL care in the last month before death: systemic anti-cancer treatment administration, emergency room visits, intensive care unit admission, hospitalization, hospitalization duration > 14 days, and hospital death.

RESULTS

Among 149 patients, 75 (50 %) met the PC team at least once, and the median time from the first encounter to death was 2.3 months. In the last month before death, at least one criterion of aggressive EOL care was present for 97 patients (70 %). For patients with PC use < 30 days and for patients with PC use < 90 days before death, there were significant changes: increase in the frequency of systemic anti-cancer treatment (respectively 51.1 % vs 20 %; p < 0.001 and 58.7 % vs 6.2 %; p < 0.001); decrease in hospitalization lasting > 14 days (respectively 30 % vs 7 %; p = 0.001 and 36 % vs 6.2 %; p = 0.018) and in death hospitalisation (respectively 66 % and 18 %; p < 0.001 and 58.7 % and 10.3 %; p < 0.001). After adjusting for the factors tested, patients with no PC or late PC use in the last month before death or in the last three month before death, the odds ratio (OR) remained significantly greater than 1 (respectively OR = 3.97 [1.70; 9.98]; p = 0.001 and OR = 23.1 [5.21-177.0], p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

PC is still insufficiently integrated for patients with NSCL cancer. Cancer centres should monitor key indicators such as PC use and aggressiveness criteria of EOL care.

Implementation of palliative care day hospital for outpatients with advanced cancer

OBJECTIVES

To describe the population of a palliative care day hospital (PCDH) in oncology and analyse the end-of-life trajectory.

METHODS

Monocentric retrospective cohort study of all referred patients for the first time to PCDH over an 8-month period with the data collected in all PCDH in their pathway care.

RESULTS

116 patients were included for 319 stays in PCDH. At first referral PCDH, 62 (53.4%) patients had ongoing anticancer therapy. Twenty-four (20.7%) and 63 (54.3%) patients were in an unstable and deteriorating phase, respectively. Mean (SD) Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score was 2.8 (0.7). Mean (SD) stay per patient was 2.8 (2.2). For all stays, mean (SD) of joint intervention of palliative care team and oncologist was 1.2 (1.2) per patient. Mean (SD) of technical acts performed was 0.2 (0.6) per patient. Among the 109 deceased patients, 16 patients (14.7%) and 7 patients (6.4%) had received chemotherapy in the last month and 15 days before death, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Our PCDH is a suitable place for a complex population still living at home. The reported patients' demographics and PCDH's organisation lead to a hybrid outpatient intervention between outpatient clinics and hospice care services. A randomised multicentric trial is ongoing to explore the impact of PCDH on patients' trajectory and the use of resources.

Early together: A randomized phase III study of early palliative care in metastatic uveal melanoma (MUM)

TPS9598

Background: Uveal melanoma is a rare cancer. Up to 50% of patients (pts) develop metastasis, mainly hepatic. Overall survival in metastatic pts is 12 months (mo), contrasting with a good overall condition until death. To evaluate the impact of integrating early palliative care on patient needs and self-efficacy, we designed a comparative randomized trial in MUM pts. Methods: 162 pts will be randomized (1:2) between the control and the experimental groups in two French centres (Institut Curie-Paris and Centre Antoine Lacassagne-Nice). In the control group, palliative care is introduced according to international guidelines. In the experimental group, it is added earlier, concomitant to the announcement of metastases by the medical oncologist. The main objective is to assess if early supportive care impacts on patient psychological needs at 6 mo, versus standard of care, based on the SCNS-SF34 questionnaire. Secondary objectives include patient’s other needs at 6 and 12 mo, quality of life (QLQ-C30), progression-free and overall survival, and partners’ needs (SCNS-P&C). MUM pts, suitable for a treatment with no curative intent, ECOG PS 0-1, with no physical or biological sign of disease, and capable of filling questionnaires are eligible. Questionnaires are completed by all pts at each oncological visit (baseline, 3, 6, 9 and 12 mo). Supportive care visits take place every 6 weeks if needed and address patient’s information needs, disease and treatment understanding, social and psychological status, symptoms, and partners’ involvement. Prognostic uncertainty and disease seriousness in the absence of symptom is addressed depending on pts’ expressed needs. Medical oncologists and supportive care physicians from both centres attend communication skill training provided by an expert during the study. Analyses: SCNS-SF34 psychological needs scale scores at 6-mo will be compared with a Student’s t-test, in an ITT analysis. For 10 points mean score difference expected between groups (within standard deviation of 20 points) and a two-sided type 1 error of 5%, inclusion of 54 pts (control group) and 108 pts (experimental group) provides the study 85% of power. The planned inclusion period is 3 years, pts will be followed for one year, for a total study duration of 4 years. From July 2020 to January 2022, 63 pts have been enrolled in the trial; 2 pts declined. Five pts were removed early from the study: one for consent retrieval, 4 for early death due to metastasis. COVID-19 delayed enrollment for 5 months. We plan to complete the study Q4 2023 and to analyze the data Q4 2024. Clinical trial information: NCT04728113. [Table: see text]

CT-Guided Percutaneous Vertebroplasty of the Cervico-Thoracic Junction for the Management of Pathologic Fracture or Symptomatic Lytic Lesion in Cancer Patients

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this retrospective observational study is to report author's experience in computed-tomography (CT)-guided percutaneous vertebroplasty (PV) of the cervicothoracic junction.

METHODS

The records of all consecutive patients treated by PV at levels C7, T1, T2, and T3 in a tertiary cancer center during year 2020 were extracted from the Institutional electronic archive. Following data were collected: demographics, indication for PV, procedure features, outcomes, and complications. Technical success was defined as when the trocar was placed into the vertebral body, allowing the injection of polymethyl-metacrylate (PMMA).

RESULTS

Eleven patients were identified who received PV on 14 levels. Mean procedure duration was 57 ± 22 min (range [31-142]). A "trans-pedicular approach at the targeted level" was used in 1 vertebra (7%), a "costotransverse approach, at the targeted level" was used in 1 vertebra (7%), a "transpedicular approach via the level below" was used in 3 vertebrae (22%), and a "costotransverse approach via the level below" was used in 9 vertebrae (64%). Meantime to deploy each trocar was 20 ± 5 min (range [12-32]). Technical success was achieved in 14/14 (100%) of vertebrae. Mean postoperative hospitalization duration was 1.9 ± 1.7 days (range [1-11]). According to CIRSE classification, no adverse event occurred. PMMA leakage occurred in two patients; both remained asymptomatic.

CONCLUSION

This study provides arguments in favor of safety and efficiency of CT-guided vertebroplasty of levels C7, T1, T2, and T3, for both trocar deployment and monitoring of the vertebral body filling during the PMMA injection.

[Adapting to the SARS-CoV2 pandemic: Experience of the Curie Institute]

L’Institut Curie prend en charge exclusivement des personnes atteintes de cancer, considérées dès le début de la pandémie SARS-CoV2 comme particulièrement « vulnérables ». Cette pandémie, qui a surpris le monde médical, est venue exiger brusquement de l’Ensemble Hospitalier une réorganisation rapide et multimodale, tout en ayant un impact sur chacun à des degrés divers. Nous examinerons ici comment cet hôpital a fait face, dans le souci d’une nouvelle balance bénéfices-risques, en temps de plus grande incertitude médicale et de rareté de certaines ressources, pour ces malades « vulnérables » mais aussi leurs proches et les personnels. Nous dégagerons par thématique les aspects positifs et les difficultés rencontrées, et ensuite ce qui pourrait être utile à d’autres hôpitaux alors que la pandémie se poursuit.

Advanced cancer and COVID-19 comorbidity: medical oncology-palliative medicine ethics meetings in a comprehensive cancer centre

OBJECTIVES

In managing patients with cancer in the COVID-19 era, clinical oncologists and palliative care practitioners had to face new, disrupting and complex medical situations, challenging the quality of the shared decision-making process. During the first lockdown in France, we developed an onco-palliative ethics meeting to enhance the quality of the decision-making process for patients with advanced cancer treated for COVID-19.

METHODS

A least one of the institutional ethics committee members was present along with oncologists, palliative care teams, psycho-oncologists, radiologists and intensive care specialists. Specific medical parameters were systematically collected to form a standardised framework for the discussions.

RESULTS

The main raised issues were the definition of new criteria for the implementation of invasive resuscitation techniques, optimal ways to adapt or delay anticancer treatment and best procedures to address terminal respiratory failure and end-of-life care. The main clinical and ethical guidelines that emerged during these debates are presented. The palliative care team played a major role in assessing and reporting patients' awareness of cancer-related prognosis and their wishes concerning invasive therapies or transfer to intensive care units, enabling an individualised benefit-risk balance assessment. The ethics committee members ensured continuous monitoring during the discussions. Their function was to recall the main ethical principles including dignity, which is conferred on people when there are treated as having equal status.

CONCLUSIONS

The onco-palliative ethics meeting provided a powerful avenue for improvement of collegiality and reinforcement of teamwork, which could be a major protection against burnout for healthcare professionals facing an epidemic onslaught.

Failure of the Ottawa Score to Predict the Risk of Recurrent Venous Thromboembolism in Cancer Patients: The Prospective PREDICARE Cohort Study

INTRODUCTION

 Recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) despite curative anticoagulation is frequent in patients with cancer. Identifying patients with a high risk of recurrence could have therapeutic implications. A prospective study was designed to validate the Ottawa risk score of recurrent VTE in cancer patients.

METHODS

 In a prospective multicenter observational cohort, adult cancer patients with a recent diagnosis of symptomatic or incidental lower limb deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism (PE) were treated with tinzaparin for 6 months. The primary endpoint was the recurrence of symptomatic or asymptomatic VTE within the first 6 months of treatment. All clinical events were centrally reviewed and adjudicated. Time-to-event outcomes were estimated by the Kalbfleisch and Prentice method to take into account the competing risk of death. A C-statistic value of > 0.70 was needed to validate the Ottawa score.

RESULTS

 A total of 409 patients were included and analyzed on an intention-to-treat basis. Median age was 68 years, 60.4% of patients had PE, and VTE was symptomatic in 271 patients (66.3%). The main primary sites were lung (31.3%), lower digestive tract (14.4%), and breast (13.9%) cancers. The Ottawa score was high (≥ 1) in 58% of patients. The 6-month cumulative incidence of recurrent VTE was 7.3% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 4.9-11.1) overall, and 5.0% (95% CI: 2.3-10.8) versus 9.1% (95%CI: 6.1-13.6) in the Ottawa low versus high risk groups, respectively. The C-statistic value was 0.60 (95% CI: 0.55-0.65).

CONCLUSION

 In this prospective cohort of patients with cancer receiving tinzaparin for VTE, the Ottawa score failed to accurately predict recurrent VTE.

Palliative care in day-hospital for advanced cancer patients: a study protocol for a multicentre randomized controlled trial

Background

Team-based and timely integrated palliative care is a gold standard of care in oncology, but issues concerning its optimal organization remain. Palliative Care in Day-Hospital (PCDH) could be one of the most efficient service model of palliative care to deliver interdisciplinary and multidimensional care addressing the complex supportive care needs of patients with advanced cancer. We hypothesize that, compared to conventional outpatient palliative care, PCDH allows the clinical benefits of palliative care to be enhanced.

Methods/design

This study is a multicentre parallel group trial with stratified randomization. Patient management in PCDH will be compared to conventional outpatient palliative care. The inclusion criteria are advanced cancer patients referred to a palliative care team with an estimated life expectancy of more than 2 months and less than 1 year. The primary endpoint is health-related quality of life with deterioration-free survival based on the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire. The secondary objectives are the following: increase in patient satisfaction with care using the EORTC PATSAT-C33 and OUT-PATSAT7 questionnaires, better understanding of the prognosis using the PTPQ questionnaire and advance care planning; decrease in the need for supportive care among relatives using the SCNS-P&C-F questionnaire, and reduction in end-of-life care aggressiveness. Patients will complete one to five questionnaires on a tablet before each monthly visit over 6 months and will be followed for 1 year. A qualitative study will take place, aiming to understand the specificity of palliative care management in PCDH. Cost-effectiveness, cost-utility and, an additional economic evaluation based on capability approach will be conducted from a societal point of view.

Discussion

The first strength of this study is that it combines the main relevant outcomes assessing integrated palliative care; patient quality of life and satisfaction; discussion of the prognosis and advance care planning, family well-being and end-of-life care aggressiveness. The second strength of the study is that it is a mixed-method study associating a qualitative analysis of the specificity of PCDH organization, with a medical-economic study to analyse the cost of care.

Trial registration

Name of the registry: IDRCB 2019-A03116–51

Trial registration number:NCT04604873

Date of registration: October 27, 2020

URL of trial registry record

A Question Prompt List for Advanced Cancer Patients Promoting Advance Care Planning: A French Randomized Trial

CONTEXT

Advance care planning is essential to enable informed medical decisions to be made and to reduce aggressiveness in end-of-life (EOL) care.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to explore whether a question prompt list (QPL) adapted to French language and culture could promote discussions, particularly on prognosis and EOL issues, among advanced cancer patients attending outpatient palliative care (PC) consultations.

METHODS

In this multicenter randomized study, patients assigned to the intervention arm received a QPL to help them prepare for the next consultation one month later. The main inclusion criteria were advanced cancer patients referred to the PC team with an estimated life expectancy of less than one year. The primary endpoint was the number of questions raised, globally and by topic. The secondary objectives were the impact of the QPL on psychological symptoms, quality of life, satisfaction with care, and coping styles at two months.

RESULTS

Patients (n = 71) in the QPL arm asked more questions (mean 21.8 vs. 18.2, P = 0.03) than patients in the control arm (n = 71), particularly on PC (5.6 vs. 3.7, P = 0.012) and EOL issues (2.2 vs. 1, P = 0.018) but not on prognosis (4.3 vs. 3.6, not specified). At two months, there was no change in anxiety, depression, or quality of life in either arm; patient satisfaction with doctors' technical skills was scored higher (P = 0.024), and avoidance coping responses were less frequent (self-distraction, P = 0.015; behavioral disengagement, P = 0.025) in the QPL arm.

CONCLUSION

Questions on PC and EOL issues in outpatient PC consultations were more frequent, and patient satisfaction was better when a QPL was made available before the consultation.

Characteristics and Outcome of SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Cancer Patients

Background

Concerns have emerged about the higher risk of fatal coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in cancer patients. In this article, we review the experience of a comprehensive cancer center.

Methods

A prospective registry was set up at Institut Curie at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic. All cancer patients with suspected or proven COVID-19 were entered and actively followed for 28 days.

Results

Among 9842 patients treated at Institut Curie between March 13 and May 1, 2020, 141 (1.4%) were diagnosed with COVID-19, based on reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction testing and/or computerized tomography scan. In line with our case mix, breast cancer (40.4%) was the most common tumor type, followed by hematological and lung malignancies. Patients with active cancer therapy or/and advanced cancer accounted for 87.9% and 68.9% of patients, respectively. At diagnosis, 78.7% of patients had COVID-19–related symptoms, with an extent of lung parenchyma involvement inferior to 50% in 95.8% of patients. Blood count variations and C-reactive protein elevation were the most common laboratory abnormalities. Antibiotics and antiviral agents were administered in 48.2% and 6.4% of patients, respectively. At the time of analysis, 26 patients (18.4%) have died from COVID-19, and 100 (70.9%) were cured. Independent prognostic factors at the time of COVID-19 diagnosis associated with death or intensive care unit admission were extent of COVID-19 pneumonia and decreased O₂ saturation.

Conclusions

COVID-19 incidence and presentation in cancer patients appear to be very similar to those in the general population. The outcome of COVID-19 is primarily driven by the initial severity of infection rather than patient or cancer characteristics.

Questions prompt lists used by palliative care teams help trigger discussions on prognosis and end-of-life issues with advanced cancer patients

12110

Background: Accuracy of prognosis perception is a key element to allow advanced cancer patients to make informed decisions and to reflect on their end-of-life priorities. This study aims to explore whether a question prompt list can promote discussions on prognosis and end-of-life issues during palliative care consultations for advanced cancer patients. Methods: In this multicentric randomised study, patients assigned in the interventional arm receive a question prompt list during the first palliative care consultation (T1) after referral by oncologists. The primary endpoint is the number of questions asked by patients during the second palliative care consultation (T2) one month later. Secondary objectives are anxiety and depression, quality-of-life, satisfaction with care, coping assessed at baseline (T1) and at two months (T3). Palliative care teams from 3 french comprehensive cancer centers participate in the study. Main inclusion criteria were adult patients with metastatic non-haematological cancer referred to the palliative care team and with an estimated life expectancy less than one year. Results: Patients (n = 71) in the QPL arm asked more questions (mean 21.8 versus 18.2, p-value = 0.03) during the palliative care consultations compared to patients in the control arm (n = 71). These questions addressed palliative care (mean 5.6 versus 3.7, p-value = 0.012) and end-of-life issues (mean 2.2 versus 1, p = 0.018) more frequently than in the control arm. At two months, compared to baseline, there was no change in anxio-depressive symptoms or quality of life. Conclusions: QPL favours discussion on prognosis and end-of-life care during the palliative care consultations for advanced cancer patients. Clinical trial information: NCT02854293 .

[Early palliative care in oncology]

Early palliative care is now recommended in international guidelines. A meta-analyze combining seven randomized studies has been published in 2007. It confirms that early palliative care improves patient's quality of life and reduces symptom burden. There is also a trend for the reduction of depressive disorder and the increase of overall survival. Other studies show that early palliative care improves quality of life of patient's relatives and reduces end of life care aggressiveness. Most of the time, early palliative care is introduced as soon as the diagnosis of advanced cancer is made, and the precise referral criteria need to be addressed. Other studies have assessed the palliative care consultation; patient-centered care, focusing on symptom management, filling information and education needs about illness and prognosis, helping psychologic adaptation and coping.

Opioids in cancer-related pain: current situation and outlook

PURPOSE

Despite progress in treatments, cancer pain remains underestimated, poorly assessed and under-treated. Prescribing strong opioids, because of their specificities, requires precision in management considering their pharmacology but also a clear understanding of recommendations. Some clinicians highlight the risk of addiction, excessive sedation and respiratory depression and their need for information. Our objective in this review is to suggest some clinical guidance for the positioning and daily use of opioids within cancer pain management.

METHODS

Critical reflection based on literature analysis and clinical practice.

RESULTS

Strong opioids may be initiated as soon as pain diagnosis is defined. Factors to consider are pain aetiology, opioid pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, genetic polymorphism, physiology (age, gender, weight and pregnancy), comorbidities (especially renal, hepatic, cardiovascular diseases), chronobiology, environmental factors, medication interference and treatment adherence. Achieving the best-balanced opioid treatment for background pain is complex, mainly due to the variable benefit/risk ratio between individuals and the experience of breakthrough cancer pain. Opioid initiation alongside a dynamic reassessment of pain should be fully integrated into the patient's management to optimise analgesia. The efficacy and safety of a strong opioid treatment need to be re-evaluated and adapted to individuals constantly as it varies over time.

CONCLUSIONS

Cancer pain is multimorphic and permanently changing due to disease evolution, curative treatments and disruptive events (concomitant treatments, pain from associated disease, comorbidities and complications, modifications of the environment). Well-managed opioids are the cornerstone of a complex environment requiring multidisciplinary dynamic assessments integrated into the patient's care pathway.

Assessing cancer pain-the first step toward improving patients' quality of life

PURPOSE

Numerous studies on cancer patients have shown that cancer pain still remains underestimated, poorly assessed, and under-treated. Pain relief should be considered as early as possible within personalized care and as an integral part of quality healthcare in many countries. Nevertheless, personalized care is still insufficiently taken into consideration, partly due to improper or incomplete assessment of cancer pain. The objective of this article is to propose a practical approach to this complex assessment, as the first step to improving patients' quality of life.

METHODS

Critical reflection based on literature analysis and clinical practice.

RESULTS

Assessment of cancer pain means evaluating the pain intensity over time, the dimensions of pain (sensory-discriminative, cognitive, emotional, and behavioral), the pathophysiological nature of pain (neuropathic, nociceptive, and nociplastic), the etiology, and the patient's perception (diffuse, localized, global). Cancer patients may have simple or multiple forms of pain (mixed, overlapped, combined, and associated). Furthermore, with the use of new specific therapies, the symptomatology of pain is also changing, and certain cancers are becoming chronic. Thus, cancer pain is an archetype of multimorphic pain, and its dynamic assessments (regular and repeated) require a multimodal and targeted approach in order to offer personalized pain management. Multimodal pain treatment must be adapted to the elements that disrupt cancer pain, to the patient's cancer and to the specific treatments.

CONCLUSIONS

The dynamic assessments of pain demand the simplest, and the most complete possible procedure, to avoid feasibility problems or self-/hetero-assessment excesses that might lead to less precise and less reliable results. Multimodal and interdisciplinary approaches are being developed, making it possible to optimize cancer pain management.

Strategies of complementary and integrative therapies in cancer-related pain-attaining exhaustive cancer pain management

PURPOSE

Complementary integrative therapies (CITs) correspond to growing demand in patients with cancer-related pain. This demand needs to be considered alongside pharmaceutical and/or interventional therapies. CITs can be used to cover certain specific pain-related characteristics. The objective of this review is to present the options for CITs that could be used within dynamic, multidisciplinary, and personalized management, leading to an integrative oncology approach.

METHODS

Critical reflection based on literature analysis and clinical practice.

RESULTS

Most CITs only showed trends in efficacy as cancer pain was mainly a secondary endpoint, or populations were restricted. Physical therapy has demonstrated efficacy in motion and pain, in some specific cancers (head and neck or breast cancers) or in treatments sequelae (lymphedema). In cancer survivors, higher levels of physical activity decrease pain intensity. Due to the multimorphism of cancer pain, certain mind-body therapies acting on anxiety, stress, depression, or mood disturbances (such as massage, acupuncture, healing touch, hypnosis, and music therapy) are efficient on cancer pain. Other mind-body therapies have shown trends in reducing the severity of cancer pain and improving other parameters, and they include education (with coping skills training), yoga, tai chi/qigong, guided imagery, virtual reality, and cognitive-behavioral therapy alone or combined. The outcome sustainability of most CITs is still questioned.

CONCLUSIONS

High-quality clinical trials should be conducted with CITs, as their efficacy on pain is mainly based on efficacy trends in pain severity, professional judgment, and patient preferences. Finally, the implementation of CITs requires an interdisciplinary team approach to offer optimal, personalized, cancer pain management.

[Medical decision in a very elderly patient: a case report of application of the Leonetti law in emergency medicine]

Advanced care decision in emergency medicine is difficult for the elderly. How to be fair, avoiding an unreasonable obstinacy? Based on the case of very old person, we show how an optimal management can be decided in accordance with the spirit of the law.

[What is an emergency situation in palliative care?]

The emergency doctor, faced with a patient receiving palliative care, must adapt treatment and care approach in a well-proportioned way. He assesses the situation, finding out about the care approach put in place and questioning the patient, his or her family and the caregivers, in order to avoid unreasonable obstinacy and to provide the most appropriate treatment.

Universal reperfusion therapy can be implemented: lessons from 20 years of management of patients admitted within 6 hours of symptom onset with ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction

AIM

To describe longitudinal trends in patients' characteristics, management and hospital outcomes over 20 years of therapy for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).

METHODS

From 1988 to 2007, 2100 consecutive patients with STEMI were admitted within 6 hours of symptom onset to a centre with a systematic reperfusion policy. The population was divided into three periods 1988-1996, 1996-2001 and 2001-2007.

RESULTS

The baseline risk of mortality increased over time (p=0.02). Use of primary PCI increased and the proportion not receiving reperfusion therapy decreased (from 11.4 to 4.2%, p=0.0001). Adjunctive use of stents and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonists increased. The proportion of patients achieving acute TIMI-3 flow in the infarct artery increased (81 to 92%, p=0.001), while time from symptom onset to reperfusion decreased (240 to 205 min, p<0.0001). This was associated with a decrease in age- and sex-adjusted in-hospital mortality from 8.9 to 7.7% and eventually 5.4% (p<0.01). However, the mortality of patients with cardiogenic shock was unaffected (76, 62 and 61%, respectively, p=0.18).

CONCLUSION

Reperfusion therapy can be implemented in up to 96% of STEMI patients admitted within 6 hours of symptom onset and this is associated with improvements in outcomes. Further improvements are needed in the management of patients with cardiogenic shock.

Acute coronary angiographic findings in survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

BACKGROUND

Diagnosis of acute coronary artery disease in survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is difficult. The role of emergency coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in this setting is debated. The objective of this study was to assess the prevalence of coronary lesions on emergency angiography in survivors of OHCA.

METHODS

Seventy-two consecutive OHCA survivors underwent systematic emergency coronary angiography. Patients with critical stenoses or occlusion underwent ad hoc PCI.

RESULTS

Most (63.9%) OHCA survivors had angiographic coronary artery disease (> or =1 lesion >50%), but only a minority (37.5%) had clinical or angiographic evidence of an acute coronary syndrome due to either an acute occlusion (16.7%) or an irregular lesion suggestive of ruptured plaque or thrombus (25.0%). A final diagnosis of myocardial infarction was assigned in 27 patients (37.5%). Percutaneous coronary intervention was attempted and successful in 33.3% of the total cohort (n = 24). Hospital survival was 48.6%. By multivariable analysis, use of PCI was not an independent correlate of survival. ST-segment elevation on admission was an independent correlate of acute myocardial infarction (odds ratio 64.2, 95% CI 7.6-544.2, P = .0001), with high positive (82.6%) and negative (83.7%) predictive values.

CONCLUSIONS

A minority of OHCA patients has angiographic evidence of an acute coronary syndrome and one-third undergo PCI, but PCI is not an independent correlate of survival. The presence of ST elevation on admission was a strong independent correlate of acute myocardial infarction and may be used to triage OHCA patients to emergency angiography with a view to PCI.

Withholding advanced cardiac life support in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A prospective study

AIM OF THE STUDY

To evaluate the decision criteria leading to refrain from starting cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in the prehospital setting.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a prospective, descriptive study, in a physician-staffed emergency medical service during a 12 month period. All patients presenting with a cardiac arrest were included. Patients were allocated to two groups: immediate decision to give CPR (R group) or withholding CPR (NR group). Characteristics of patients including previous health status, time intervals, therapies and outcomes, were collected. Data were compared between the two groups, *p<0.05.

RESULTS

One hundred and fourteen patients (aged 61+/-18 years) were enrolled in R group and 113 (73+/-19 years*) in NR group. Patients of NR group more frequently presented with a deterioration of functional independence (51% versus 10%*), cognitive impairment (21% versus 8%*) and higher McCabe score and Knaus class (McCabe 2: 24% versus 2%*; Knaus class D: 23% versus 3%*). Presence of a bystander (75% versus 44%*) or basic life support (BLS) started by the bystander (40% versus 12%*) were more frequent in R than NR. Age (OR, 1.1; 95% CI, 1.0-1.1), McCabe score >0 (OR, 10.5; 95% CI, 1.4-79.0), lack of bystander BLS (OR, 11.2; 95% CI, 2.2-60.7) and ineffectiveness of BLS by EMTs (OR, 12.1; 95% CI, 2.0-72.8) were independent factors of withholding CPR. The physician conducted often the discussion alone (48%).

CONCLUSION

Decision criteria leading to refrain from starting CPR in the prehospital setting are age, previous health status and initial BLS. Further thought should be allowed to ensure a share in the decision-making process in this particular practice.

Prise en charge par le Smur d'un patient en arrêt cardiaque en vue d'un prélèvement d'organe à cœur arrêté

After their prehospital management by EMS system and on-scene declaration of death, some patients are potential non-heart-beating donors. We report the case of refractory cardiac arrest, transferred to the hospital assisted by chest compression device. Time factor might be an important brake on prehospital recruitment. Future networks should attempt to shorten the time intervals.

A quality control programme for acute myocardial infarction management in out-of-hospital critical care medicine

This study, conducted over two time periods, aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of the diffusion of data, implementation of correctives measures and updated protocols in reducing time to reperfusion in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) management in the out-of-hospital setting. Mean (SD) time to hospital admission and to arterial puncture improved (58 (13) vs 67 (18) min, p = 0.03; and 82 (16) vs 95 (29) min, p = 0.02). The study, performed according to quality control programme methodology, showed that the chronology of AMI management could be improved by appropriate interventions and monitoring of intervention times.

Enquête sur l’utilisation du mannitol en réanimation préhospitalière en Île-de-France

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the use of mannitol in prehospital care in Paris area.

STUDY DESIGN

Survey using telephone interviews.

METHODS

Emergency physicians on duty in the 37 emergency departments in charge of prehospital care in Paris area were called by one investigator. They were asked to answer a questionnaire about their own use of mannitol in the prehospital setting.

RESULTS

Ninety-six questionnaires were recorded. Physicians were anaesthesiologists (9%) or emergency physicians (87%). In three departments, mannitol was not available in the ambulances. Thirty-five per cent (n = 34) reported no use of mannitol and 17% (n = 16) just once. Fourteen physicians (15%) did not want to use it. The reasons for not using mannitol were lack of knowledge about efficacy for five, need for previous brain imaging for seven or neurosurgeon's agreement before using mannitol for three. For those who had already used mannitol or were ready to use it, the main indication was increased intracranial pressure with clinical signs of brain herniation after severe brain injury for 92% of physicians. Thirty-one % reported not knowing the dose of mannitol, 33% having a memorandum immediately available and among those who answered the question, 63% gave a value compatible with guidelines.

CONCLUSION

A significant percentage of physicians tacking part in the French prehospital care system, do not follow published guidelines on the use of mannitol. Actions improving implementation of those guidelines should be supported.