Evaluation of the Effect of Lorlatinib on CYP2B6, CYP2C9, UGT, and P-Glycoprotein Substrates in Patients with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Lorlatinib is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor approved for the treatment of advanced anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive non-small cell lung cancer. This study assessed the effect of steady-state lorlatinib on the metabolic enzymes cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2B6, CYP2C9, and uridine 5'-diphospho-glucuronosyltransferase (UGT) and the P-glycoprotein (P-gp) transporter.

METHODS

Thirty-two patients received a single oral dose of a probe drug on Day - 2 to determine the pharmacokinetics of the probe drug alone. Starting on Day 1, patients received 100 mg oral lorlatinib daily. On Day 15, a single oral dose of the probe drug was administered concurrently with lorlatinib. Pharmacokinetic parameters for these probe substrates were assessed.

RESULTS

Plasma exposures of all probe substrates were reduced by lorlatinib compared with the probe alone. The greatest reduction in area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity (AUC∞) and maximum (peak) plasma drug concentration (Cmax) (67% and 63% decrease, respectively) was observed with the P-gp probe substrate fexofenadine. Lorlatinib coadministration also decreased the AUC∞ and Cmax of bupropion (CYP2B6 probe substrate) by 25% and 27%, tolbutamide (CYP2C9 probe substrate) by 43% and 15%, and acetaminophen (UGT probe substrate) by 45% and 28%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Lorlatinib is a net moderate inducer of P-gp and a weak inducer of CYP2B6, CYP2C9, and UGT after steady state is achieved with daily dosing. Medications that are P-gp substrates with a narrow therapeutic window should be avoided in patients taking lorlatinib; no dose modifications are needed with substrates of CYP2B6, CYP2C9, or UGT.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov: NCT01970865.

Early Circulating Tumor DNA Dynamics and Efficacy of Lorlatinib in Patients With Treatment-Naive, Advanced, ALK-Positive NSCLC

INTRODUCTION

Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has been used as a biomarker for prognostication and response to treatment. Here, we evaluate ctDNA as a potential biomarker for response to lorlatinib, a third-generation ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitor in patients with treatment-naive, advanced, ALK-positive NSCLC in the ongoing phase 3 CROWN study (NCT03052608).

METHODS

Molecular responses were calculated using mean variant allele frequency (VAF), longitudinal mean change in VAF (dVAF), and ratio to baseline. Efficacy assessments (progression-free survival [PFS] and objective response rate) were paired with individual patient ctDNA and analyzed for association.

RESULTS

Compared with baseline, mean VAF at week 4 was decreased in both treatment arms. Considering all detected somatic variants, a reduction in dVAF (≤0) was associated with a longer PFS in the lorlatinib arm. The hazard ratio (HR) for a dVAF less than or equal to 0 versus more than 0 was 0.50 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.23-1.12) in the lorlatinib arm. A similar association was not observed for crizotinib (HR = 1.00, 95% CI: 0.49-2.03). Comparing molecular responders with nonresponders, patients treated with lorlatinib who had a molecular response had longer PFS (HR = 0.37, 95% CI: 0.16-0.85); patients treated with crizotinib who had a molecular response had similar PFS as those without a molecular response (HR = 1.48, 95% CI: 0.67-3.30).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with treatment-naive, advanced, ALK-positive NSCLC, early ctDNA dynamics predicted better outcome with lorlatinib but not with crizotinib. These results suggest that ctDNA may be used to monitor and potentially predict efficacy of lorlatinib treatment.

Efficacy of Lorlatinib in Treatment-Naive Patients With ALK-Positive Advanced NSCLC in Relation to EML4::ALK Variant Type and ALK With or Without TP53 Mutations

INTRODUCTION

Lorlatinib, a third-generation ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitor, improved outcomes compared with crizotinib in patients with previously untreated ALK-positive advanced NSCLC in the phase 3 CROWN study. Here, we investigated response correlates using plasma circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) and tumor tissue profiling.

METHODS

ALK fusions and ALK with or without TP53 mutations were assessed by next-generation sequencing. End points included objective response rate (ORR), duration of response, and progression-free survival (PFS) by blinded independent central review on the basis of EML4::ALK variants and ALK with or without TP53 or other mutation status.

RESULTS

ALK fusions were detected in the ctDNA of 62 patients in the lorlatinib arm and 64 patients in the crizotinib arm. ORRs were numerically higher with lorlatinib versus crizotinib for EML4::ALK variant 1 (v1; 80.0% versus 50.0%) and variant 2 (v2; 85.7% versus 50.0%) but were similar between the arms for variant 3 (v3; 72.2% versus 73.9%). Median PFS in the lorlatinib arm was not reached for EML4::ALK v1 and v2 and was 33.3 months for v3; in the crizotinib arm, median PFS was 7.4 months, not reached, and 5.5 months, respectively. ORRs and PFS were improved with lorlatinib versus crizotinib regardless of TP53 mutation status and in patients harboring preexisting bypass pathway resistance alterations. In the lorlatinib arm, PFS was lower in patients who had a co-occurring TP53 mutation. Results from ctDNA analysis were similar to those observed with tumor tissue samples.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with untreated ALK-positive advanced NSCLC derived greater clinical benefits, with higher ORRs and potentially longer PFS, when treated with lorlatinib compared with crizotinib, independent of EML4::ALK variant or ALK mutations, TP53 mutations, or bypass resistance alterations.

Therapy-induced APOBEC3A drives evolution of persistent cancer cells

Acquired drug resistance to anticancer targeted therapies remains an unsolved clinical problem. Although many drivers of acquired drug resistance have been identified1-4, the underlying molecular mechanisms shaping tumour evolution during treatment are incompletely understood. Genomic profiling of patient tumours has implicated apolipoprotein B messenger RNA editing catalytic polypeptide-like (APOBEC) cytidine deaminases in tumour evolution; however, their role during therapy and the development of acquired drug resistance is undefined. Here we report that lung cancer targeted therapies commonly used in the clinic can induce cytidine deaminase APOBEC3A (A3A), leading to sustained mutagenesis in drug-tolerant cancer cells persisting during therapy. Therapy-induced A3A promotes the formation of double-strand DNA breaks, increasing genomic instability in drug-tolerant persisters. Deletion of A3A reduces APOBEC mutations and structural variations in persister cells and delays the development of drug resistance. APOBEC mutational signatures are enriched in tumours from patients with lung cancer who progressed after extended responses to targeted therapies. This study shows that induction of A3A in response to targeted therapies drives evolution of drug-tolerant persister cells, suggesting that suppression of A3A expression or activity may represent a potential therapeutic strategy in the prevention or delay of acquired resistance to lung cancer targeted therapy.

Plain language summary of the updated results from the CROWN study comparing lorlatinib with crizotinib in people with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

WHAT IS THIS SUMMARY ABOUT?

This summary shows the updated results of an ongoing research study called CROWN that was published in The Lancet Respiratory Medicine in December 2022. In the CROWN study, researchers looked at the effects of two study medicines called lorlatinib and crizotinib. The study included people with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) that had not been treated previously. All people in the study had cancer cells with changes (known as alterations) in a gene called anaplastic lymphoma kinase, or ALK. This ALK gene is involved in cancer growth. In this updated study, researchers looked at the continued benefit in people who took lorlatinib compared with people who took crizotinib after 3 years.

WHAT DID THIS STUDY FIND?

After 3 years of being observed, people who took lorlatinib were more likely to be alive without their cancer getting worse than people who took crizotinib. At 3 years, 64% of people who took lorlatinib were alive without their cancer getting worse compared with 19% of people who took crizotinib. The cancer was less likely to have spread within or to the brain in people who took lorlatinib than in people who took crizotinib. After 3 years of being observed, 61% of people were still taking lorlatinib and 8% of people were still taking crizotinib. People who took lorlatinib had more severe side effects than people who took crizotinib. However, these side effects were manageable. The most common side effects with lorlatinib were high levels of cholesterol or high levels of triglycerides (a type of fat) in the blood. Life-threatening side effects were seen in 13% of people who took lorlatinib and 8% in crizotinib. Two people who took lorlatinib died because of side effects from lorlatinib.

WHAT DO THE RESULTS OF THE STUDY MEAN?

The updated results from the CROWN study showed that a larger percentage of people who took lorlatinib continued to benefit from their treatment after being observed for 3 years compared with those who took crizotinib. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT03052608 (phase 3 CROWN study) (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Genomic and transcriptomic analysis of checkpoint blockade response in advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 agents have transformed the treatment landscape of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). To expand our understanding of the molecular features underlying response to checkpoint inhibitors in NSCLC, we describe here the first joint analysis of the Stand Up To Cancer-Mark Foundation cohort, a resource of whole exome and/or RNA sequencing from 393 patients with NSCLC treated with anti-PD-(L)1 therapy, along with matched clinical response annotation. We identify a number of associations between molecular features and outcome, including (1) favorable (for example, ATM altered) and unfavorable (for example, TERT amplified) genomic subgroups, (2) a prominent association between expression of inducible components of the immunoproteasome and response and (3) a dedifferentiated tumor-intrinsic subtype with enhanced response to checkpoint blockade. Taken together, results from this cohort demonstrate the complexity of biological determinants underlying immunotherapy outcomes and reinforce the discovery potential of integrative analysis within large, well-curated, cancer-specific cohorts.

ALK-positive lung cancer: a moving target

Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) is a potent oncogenic driver in lung cancer. ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors yield significant benefit in patients with ALK fusion-positive (ALK+) lung cancers; yet the durability of response is limited by drug resistance. Elucidation of on-target resistance mechanisms has facilitated the development of next-generation ALK inhibitors, but overcoming ALK-independent resistance mechanisms remains a challenge. In this Review, we discuss the molecular underpinnings of acquired resistance to ALK-directed therapy and highlight new treatment approaches aimed at inducing long-term remission in ALK+ disease.

Efficacy and safety of first-line lorlatinib versus crizotinib in patients with advanced, ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer: updated analysis of data from the phase 3, randomised, open-label CROWN study

BACKGROUND

After a median follow-up of 18·3 months, the third-generation anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) tyrosine-kinase inhibitor, lorlatinib, improved progression-free survival in patients with treatment-naive, ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer in the phase 3 CROWN study. Here we report updated efficacy data, including intracranial activity, from an unplanned analysis after 3 years of follow-up.

METHODS

CROWN is an ongoing, international, randomised, open-label phase 3 trial done in 104 centres in 23 countries worldwide. Eligible participants were aged 18 years and older or aged 20 years and older (depending on local regulations) with advanced, ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer, had received no previous systemic treatment for metastatic disease, had at least one extracranial measurable target lesion (according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours [RECIST], version 1.1), and had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score of 0-2. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to oral lorlatinib 100 mg daily or oral crizotinib 250 mg twice daily in 28-day cycles. Randomisation was stratified by the presence or absence of brain metastasis, and by ethnicity. Since the primary endpoint of the study had been met at the planned interim analysis, no further formal analysis of progression-free survival was planned, per protocol. The current unplanned analysis was done to further characterise tumour-related endpoints with a longer follow-up and is presented descriptively. For the planned study, the primary endpoint was progression-free survival assessed by blinded independent central review. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (investigator), objective response rate, intracranial objective response rate, time to intracranial progression, duration of response, intracranial duration of response, and safety. Efficacy endpoints were also assessed by the presence or absence of baseline brain metastases. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03052608.

FINDINGS

Between May 11, 2017, and Feb 28, 2019, 425 patients were screened for eligibility, of whom 296 were enrolled and randomly assigned to the lorlatinib (n=149) or crizotinib (n=147) group. At data cutoff for this unplanned analysis (Sept 20, 2021), median duration of follow-up for progression-free survival was 36·7 months (IQR 31·3-41·9) for lorlatinib and 29·3 months (10·8-35·0) for crizotinib. Median progression-free survival by blinded independent central review was not reached (95% CI not reached-not reached) for lorlatinib and was 9·3 months (7·6-11·1) for crizotinib (hazard ratio [HR] 0·27 [95% CI 0·18-0·39]). 3-year progression-free survival was 64% (95% CI 55-71) in the lorlatinib group and 19% (12-27) in the crizotinib group. Progression-free survival (investigator), objective response rate, intracranial objective response rate, time to intracranial progression, and duration of response were improved with lorlatinib versus crizotinib. In patients with baseline brain metastases (n=37 lorlatinib; n=39 crizotinib), the HR for time to intracranial progression for lorlatinib versus crizotinib was 0·10 (95% CI 0·04-0·27); in patients without baseline brain metastases (n=112 lorlatinib; n=108 crizotinib), the HR was 0·02 (95% CI 0·002-0·14). In patients without brain metastases, one (1%) in the lorlatinib group and 25 (23%) in the crizotinib group had intracranial progression. Grade 3-4 adverse events occurred in 113 (76%) of 149 patients (most commonly due to altered lipid levels) with lorlatinib and in 81 (57%) of 142 patients with crizotinib. Adverse events led to treatment discontinuation in 11 (7%) patients in the lorlatinib group and 14 (10%) patients in the crizotinib group. There were no new safety signals.

INTERPRETATION

These updated, long-term data from CROWN show the durable benefit of lorlatinib over crizotinib in patients with treatment-naive, ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer and support the use of first-line lorlatinib in patients with and without baseline brain metastases.

FUNDING

Pfizer.

Patient-reported outcomes from the randomized phase 3 CROWN study of first-line lorlatinib versus crizotinib in advanced ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVES

Quality of life (QoL) for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is negatively impacted by their disease and treatment side effects. We present detailed patient-reported outcome (PRO) data from the phase 3 CROWN study, which compared lorlatinib with crizotinib in patients with previously untreated ALK-positive advanced NSCLC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

PROs were assessed using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer QoL Questionnaire with Lung Cancer module. A longitudinal, random-intercept, random-slope, mixed-effect model assessed score changes from baseline up to (not including) end of treatment. Mean changes of absolute scores from baseline at each cycle were calculated and presented up to cycle 18 (≥ 10-point change considered clinically meaningful).

RESULTS

In both lorlatinib (n = 148) and crizotinib (n = 140) arms, there were longitudinal improvements across multiple functioning and symptom scores during treatment compared with pre-treatment. Numerical improvements for most longitudinal functioning scores (physical, role, emotional, social) favored lorlatinib; cognitive functioning favored crizotinib. Numerical improvements favored lorlatinib for several symptoms (fatigue, nausea and vomiting, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea [clinically meaningful improvement], and cough); peripheral neuropathy favored crizotinib. Subgroup analyses showed PROs did not differ by presence/absence of baseline brain metastases.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients receiving first-line lorlatinib or crizotinib showed improvements and delayed deterioration in QoL, functioning, and several symptoms. Alongside the previously reported significantly longer progression-free survival and higher intracranial response rates for lorlatinib versus crizotinib, these data further support the use of lorlatinib over crizotinib in patients with advanced ALK-positive NSCLC with/without baseline brain metastases and provide evidence of several QoL improvements with lorlatinib when used in the first-line setting.

A Phase 2 Study of Lorlatinib in Patients With ROS1-Rearranged Lung Cancer With Brain-Only Progression on Crizotinib

Introduction

The central nervous system (CNS) is a common site of progression among patients with ROS1-rearranged lung cancer receiving crizotinib. We conducted a phase 2 study to evaluate the intracranial efficacy of lorlatinib in patients with ROS1-rearranged lung cancer who developed CNS-only progression on crizotinib.

Methods

Patients with metastatic ROS1-rearranged lung cancer with CNS-only progression on crizotinib received lorlatinib 100 mg daily. The primary end point was intracranial disease control rate at 12 weeks per modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1. Secondary end points included intracranial and extracranial progression-free survival, intracranial objective response rate, and safety/tolerability.

Results

A total of 16 patients were enrolled between November 2016 and January 2019. Nine patients (56%) had received prior CNS radiation, with a median of 10.9 months between radiation and lorlatinib. At 12 weeks, the intracranial disease control rate was 100% and intracranial objective response rate was 87%. While on study, the complee intracranial response rate was 60%. With median follow-up of 22 months, seven patients experienced disease progression, including five patients with CNS relapse. The median intracranial and extracranial progression-free survivals were 38.8 months (95% confidence interval: 16.9–not reported) and 41.1 months (95% confidence interval: 17.6–not reported), respectively. Molecular analysis of plasma or tissue from patients with extracranial progression on lorlatinib revealed ROS1 G2032R (n = 1), ROS1 L2086F (n = 1), and CCDC6-RET fusion plus ROS1 G2032R (n = 1). The safety profile of lorlatinib was consistent with prior studies. There were 11 patients (69%) who required dose reduction, including one patient who discontinued treatment for grade 3 edema. No grade greater than or equal to 4 adverse events were observed.

Conclusions

Lorlatinib induced durable intracranial responses in patients with ROS1-rearranged NSCLC and prior isolated CNS progression on crizotinib.

Abstract 657: Impact of therapy induced APOBEC3A mutagenesis on tumor evolution in non small cell lung cancer

Acquired drug resistance to even the most effective anti cancer targeted therapies remains an unsolved clinical problem. Although many drivers of acquired drug resistance have been identified, the underlying molecular mechanisms shaping tumor evolution during treatment are incompletely understood. We have seen that lung cancer targeted therapies commonly used in the clinic induce the expression of cytidine deaminase APOBEC3A (A3A), leading to sustained mutagenesis in drug tolerant cancer cells persisting during therapy. Preventing therapy induced A3A mutagenesis by gene deletion delayed the emergence of drug resistance. Here, we show that therapy induced A3A mutagenesis contributes to tumor evolution in NSCLC. Whole genome sequencing revealed that resistant clones that evolved from persistent drug tolerant cells (late clones) harbored more A3A mutations compared to the parental cell population than pre existing resistant clones (early clones). In a subset of NSCLC patients who received targeted therapies, we observed A3A mutations accompanied clonal evolution during treatment. Comparison of APOBEC mutation fractions in short vs long term responders suggests that short responders with acquired resistance mechanisms that evolved from pre existing resistant clones have less accumulation of APOBEC mutations. Collectively, these findings insist that an increase in mutagenic processes drives tumor evolution during targeted therapy treatment and leads to acquired resistance. Thus, suppressing expression or enzymatic activity of A3A may represent a potential therapeutic strategy to halt the evolution of resistant clones and prevent acquired resistance to lung cancer targeted therapy.

Citation Format: Hideko Isozaki, Ammal Abbasi, Naveed Nikpour, Marcello Stanzione, Ramin Sakhtemani, Susanna L. Monroe, Alice T. Shaw, Jessica J. Lin, Lecia V. Sequist, Zofia Piotrowska, Rémi Buisson, Michael S. Lawrence, Aaron N. Hata. Impact of therapy induced APOBEC3A mutagenesis on tumor evolution in non small cell lung cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 657.

Phase II Study of Lorlatinib in Patients With Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase-Positive Lung Cancer and CNS-Specific Relapse

PURPOSE

The CNS is a recurrent site of progression in anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-rearranged (ALK+) lung cancer. Lorlatinib is a third-generation ALK inhibitor developed to penetrate the CNS and overcome ALK resistance mutations. We conducted a phase II study to evaluate the intracranial activity of lorlatinib in patients with CNS-only progression on second-generation ALK inhibitors.

METHODS

Patients with ALK+ lung cancer who had intracranial progression on ≥ 1 ALK inhibitor without measurable extracranial disease received lorlatinib 100 mg once daily. The primary end point was intracranial disease control rate at 12 weeks per modified RECIST v1.1. Secondary end points included intracranial progression-free survival, intracranial objective response rate, and safety/tolerability.

RESULTS

Twenty-three patients were enrolled between November 2016 and January 2019. Fifteen (65%) patients had irradiated CNS metastases, with a median of 20.2 months between radiation and lorlatinib. Control of intracranial disease was observed in 21 (95%) evaluable patients at 12 weeks. The intracranial objective response rate was 59% with six complete and seven partial responses. The median intracranial progression-free survival was 24.6 months (95% CI, 20.2 to not reached). With a median follow-up of 16.8 months, nine patients developed disease progression, including four patients with CNS progression. The most common treatment-related adverse events were hypercholesterolemia (96%), hypertriglyceridemia (87%), edema (65%), cognitive effects (52%), and mood effects (43%). Three patients discontinued treatment because of toxicity, including two patients with fatal respiratory events.

CONCLUSION

Lorlatinib induced durable intracranial disease control in patients with CNS-only relapse on second-generation ALK inhibitors, suggesting that tumors with CNS-limited progression on brain-penetrant ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors remain ALK-dependent.

Circulating Cell-free DNA as a Prognostic Biomarker in Patients with Advanced ALK+ Non-small Cell Lung Cancer in the Global Phase III ALEX Trial

PURPOSE

We retrospectively assessed prognostic value of circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) using data from the phase III ALEX study in treatment-naïve, advanced ALK+ non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients were randomized to receive twice-daily alectinib 600 mg (n = 152) or crizotinib 250 mg (n = 151). cfDNA was quantified from baseline plasma samples, with patients stratified into ≤median and >median cfDNA biomarker-evaluable populations (BEP). Effect of cfDNA concentration on outcomes was analyzed using a Cox regression model with treatment group as covariate, and in multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

Median cfDNA concentration in the BEP was 11.53 ng/mL (n = 276). A positive correlation was found between cfDNA concentration and number of lesions, organ lesion sites, and tumor size (sum of longest diameter; all P < 0.0001). In both treatment arms, patients in the >median BEP were more likely to experience disease progression than the ≤median BEP [alectinib adjusted HR = 2.04; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.07-3.89; P = 0.0305 and crizotinib adjusted HR = 1.83; 95% CI, 1.11-3.00, P = 0.0169]. Median progression-free survival was longer with alectinib than crizotinib in both ≤median and >median BEPs (P < 0.0001). Overall survival data remain immature; survival probability was lower in the >median versus ≤median BEP in both treatment arms (alectinib HR = 2.52; 95% CI, 1.08-5.88; P = 0.0333 and crizotinib HR = 2.63; 95% CI, 1.27-5.47; P = 0.0096).

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest that plasma cfDNA concentration may have prognostic value in advanced ALK+ NSCLC. Prospectively designed studies are warranted to investigate this finding.

Safety and activity of alectinib plus bevacizumab in patients with advanced ALK-rearranged non-small-cell lung cancer: a phase I/II study

Background

Alectinib, a second-generation anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), is highly effective in advanced ALK-rearranged non-small-cell lung cancer and represents a standard first-line therapy. New strategies are needed, however, to delay resistance. We conducted a phase I/II study to assess the safety and efficacy of combining alectinib with bevacizumab, a monoclonal antibody against vascular endothelial growth factor.

Patients and methods

Patients with advanced ALK-rearranged non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer were enrolled. The phase I portion employed a dose de-escalation strategy with alectinib and bevacizumab starting at the individual standard doses. The primary objective was to determine the recommended phase II dose (RP2D). In phase II, the primary objective was to evaluate the safety of the combination at the RP2D; the secondary objective was to determine extracranial and intracranial efficacy.

Results

Eleven patients were enrolled between September 2015 and February 2020. Most patients (82%) had baseline brain metastases. Six patients (55%) were treatment-naive; five (46%) had received prior ALK TKIs (crizotinib, n = 3; ceritinib, n = 1; crizotinib then brigatinib, n = 1). No dose-limiting toxicities occurred. RP2D was determined as alectinib 600 mg orally twice daily plus bevacizumab 15 mg/kg intravenously every 3 weeks. Three patients experienced grade 3 treatment-related adverse events: pneumonitis related to alectinib, proteinuria related to bevacizumab, and hypertension related to bevacizumab. Treatment-related intracranial hemorrhage was not observed. Six (100%) of six treatment-naive patients and three (60%) of five ALK TKI-pretreated patients had objective responses; median progression-free survival was not reached (95% confidence interval, 9.0 months-not reached) and 9.5 months (95% confidence interval, 4.3 months-not reached), respectively. Intracranial responses occurred in four (100%) of four treatment-naive and three (60%) of five TKI-pretreated patients with baseline brain metastases. The study was stopped prematurely because of slow accrual.

Conclusions

Alectinib plus bevacizumab was well tolerated without unanticipated toxicities or dose-limiting toxicities.

•

Alectinib plus bevacizumab is safe in patients with advanced ALK-rearranged non-small-cell lung cancer.

•

Bevacizumab combined with alectinib does not increase risk of intracranial hemorrhage in patients with brain metastases.

•

Enrollment challenges with this trial highlight important considerations for future studies of ALK inhibitor combinations.

Plain language summary of the CROWN study comparing lorlatinib with crizotinib for people with untreated non-small cell lung cancer

This is a summary of a research study (known as a clinical trial) called CROWN. The study tested two medicines called lorlatinib and crizotinib in participants with untreated non-small cell lung cancer that had spread to other parts of their body. All those who took part had changes in a gene called ALK, which is involved in cell growth. In total, 296 participants from 23 countries took part. Half the participants took lorlatinib and half took crizotinib. After participants started taking lorlatinib or crizotinib, they were checked regularly to see if their tumors had grown or spread to other parts of their body (known as tumor progression) and to monitor any side effects. After 1 year of treatment, the participants who took lorlatinib were twice as likely to be alive with no tumor growth as the participants who took crizotinib. More participants who took lorlatinib had cancer that shrank (76%) compared with the participants who took crizotinib (58%). This was also true of the participants whose cancer had spread to their brain. The most common side effects in participants who took lorlatinib were increases in the amount of cholesterol and triglycerides (a type of fat) in their blood, swelling, weight gain, nerve damage, unclear thoughts, and diarrhea. Among the participants who took crizotinib, the most common side effects were diarrhea, feeling like you want to throw up, sight problems, swelling, vomiting, changes in liver function, and feeling tired. Overall, the CROWN study showed that fewer participants with advanced ALK+ non-small cell lung cancer died or had tumor growth with lorlatinib compared with crizotinib treatment. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT number: NCT03052608.

Three subtypes of lung cancer fibroblasts define distinct therapeutic paradigms

Cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) are highly heterogeneous. With the lack of a comprehensive understanding of CAFs' functional distinctions, it remains unclear how cancer treatments could be personalized based on CAFs in a patient's tumor. We have established a living biobank of CAFs derived from biopsies of patients' non-small lung cancer (NSCLC) that encompasses a broad molecular spectrum of CAFs in clinical NSCLC. By functionally interrogating CAF heterogeneity using the same therapeutics received by patients, we identify three functional subtypes: (1) robustly protective of cancers and highly expressing HGF and FGF7; (2) moderately protective of cancers and highly expressing FGF7; and (3) those providing minimal protection. These functional differences among CAFs are governed by their intrinsic TGF-β signaling, which suppresses HGF and FGF7 expression. This CAF functional classification correlates with patients' clinical response to targeted therapies and also associates with the tumor immune microenvironment, therefore providing an avenue to guide personalized treatment.

Efficacy of Taletrectinib (AB-106/DS-6051b) in ROS1+ NSCLC: An Updated Pooled Analysis of U.S. and Japan Phase 1 Studies

Introduction

Taletrectinib (AB-106/DS-6051b) is an oral, potent selective ROS1 and pan-NTRK tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI). Preclinically, taletrectinib has activity against ROS1 G2032R solvent-front mutation.

Methods

Patients with ROS1+ NSCLC enrolled into two phase 1 studies conducted in United States (U101, NCT02279433) and Japan (J102, NCT02675491) were analyzed for objective response rate (ORR) by the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1, progression-free survival, and safety.

Results

A total of 22 patients with ROS1+ NSCLC out of the total 61 patients enrolled were analyzed. Taletrectinib was given at the oral dose of 400 mg, 600 mg, 800 mg, and 1200 mg once daily and 400 mg twice daily as part of the dose-escalation schema. Data cutoff was August 19, 2020. Median follow-up time for all 22 patients was 14.9 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 4.1–33.8). A total of 18 patients with ROS1+ were assessable for response. The confirmed ORR for ROS1 TKI-naive patients (N = 9) was 66.7% (95% CI: 35.4–87.9) with a disease control rate of 100% (70.1–100). The confirmed ORR for crizotinib pretreated patients (N = 6) was 33.3% (95% CI: 9.7–70.0) with a disease control rate of 88.3% (95% CI: 443.6–97.0). The median progression-free survival for ROS1 TKI-naive patients (N = 11) was 29.1 months (95% CI: 2.6–not reached) and 14.2 months (95% CI: 1.5–not reached) for crizotinib-refractory only patients (N = 8). The most common treatment-related adverse events were alanine transaminase elevations (72.7%), aspartate transaminase elevations (72.7%), nausea (50.0%), and diarrhea (50.0%). Grade 3 or higher adverse events were alanine transaminase elevations (18.2%), aspartate transaminase (9.1%), and diarrhea (4.5%).

Conclusions

Taletrectinib (AB106/DS6051b) has a meaningful clinical activity in patients with advanced ROS1+ NSCLC who are ROS1 TKI-naive or crizotinib-refractory and a manageable safety profile.

Early circulating tumor (ct) DNA dynamics and efficacy of lorlatinib: Analysis from the CROWN study

9011

Background: Lorlatinib, a third-generation ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitor, significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) and overall/intracranial responses vs crizotinib in patients (pts) with previously untreated ALK-positive advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in the ongoing randomized Phase 3 CROWN study (NCT03052608). To identify whether additional molecular biomarker analysis correlated with efficacy, we evaluated early ctDNA dynamics compared with clinical outcomes. Methods: Plasma samples were prospectively collected at screening (SC), week 4 (cycle 2, day 1 [C2D1]), week 24 (C7D1), and end of treatment for ctDNA analysis. ctDNA was analyzed using Guardant360CDx (Guardant Health, Inc., Redwood City, CA, USA). Mean variant allele fraction (VAF) of ALK alterations (fusions and/or mutations) and overall detected alterations at each time point and longitudinal mean change (dVAF) as (VAFC2D1) – (VAFSC) were calculated; dVAF <0 indicated decreased ctDNA at week 4. Objective tumor response and PFS were evaluated according to dVAF. These analyses were repeated vs ctDNA results at week 24. Additional correlation analyses between depth of molecular response and/or ctDNA clearance and clinical outcomes are ongoing. Results: Paired samples were available at SC and week 4 from 232 of 255 pts included in the ctDNA analysis: 118/130 (90.8%) in the lorlatinib arm and 114/125 (91.2%) in the crizotinib arm. ALK alterations were detected in 122/232 (52.6%) pts at SC (62/118 [52.5%] from the lorlatinib arm) but only 19/232 (8.2%) at week 4 (8/118 [6.8%] from the lorlatinib arm). Mean VAF of ALK alterations at week 4 was significantly decreased compared with SC in both treatment arms (lorlatinib -1.54, crizotinib -1.25; both P<0.0001; P=0.4239 between arms). In the lorlatinib arm, mean VAF at week 4 was significantly decreased compared with SC in pts with a complete or partial response (dVAF -1.53; n=47; P<0.0001), or stable disease (dVAF -1.37; n=12; P=0.0304). Similar results were observed in the crizotinib arm. In pts with dVAF <0 for ALK alterations, mean percent change from screening in tumor size was -40.8% with lorlatinib (n=59) and -38.7% with crizotinib (n=58). Only 2 pts had dVAF ≥0, both from the crizotinib arm. Median PFS for pts with dVAF <0 for ALK alterations was not reached in the lorlatinib arm (n=62), and was 7.4 months (95% CI, 7.2–9.3) in the crizotinib arm (n=58). Similar response and PFS data were observed in the analysis of dVAF for ALK alterations at week 24. Conclusions: Early ctDNA dynamics may predict lorlatinib efficacy in pts with previously untreated ALK-positive NSCLC. The magnitude of reduction in ctDNA at 4 weeks may be associated with better responses and potentially longer PFS. These findings further support the utility of dynamic ctDNA monitoring in ALK-positive NSCLC. Reference: Shaw AT, et al. N Engl J Med. 2020;383:2018-2029. Clinical trial information: NCT03052608.

Spectrum of Mechanisms of Resistance to Crizotinib and Lorlatinib in ROS1 Fusion-Positive Lung Cancer

PURPOSE

Current standard initial therapy for advanced, ROS proto-oncogene 1, receptor tyrosine kinase fusion (ROS1)-positive (ROS1⁺) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is crizotinib or entrectinib. Lorlatinib, a next-generation anaplastic lymphoma kinase/ROS1 inhibitor, recently demonstrated efficacy in ROS1⁺ NSCLC, including in crizotinib-pretreated patients. However, mechanisms of lorlatinib resistance in ROS1⁺ disease remain poorly understood. Here, we assessed mechanisms of resistance to crizotinib and lorlatinib.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Biopsies from patients with ROS1 ⁺ NSCLC progressing on crizotinib or lorlatinib were profiled by genetic sequencing.

RESULTS

From 55 patients, 47 post-crizotinib and 32 post-lorlatinib biopsies were assessed. Among 42 post-crizotinib and 28 post-lorlatinib biopsies analyzed at distinct timepoints, ROS1 mutations were identified in 38% and 46%, respectively. ROS1 G2032R was the most commonly occurring mutation in approximately one third of cases. Additional ROS1 mutations included D2033N (2.4%) and S1986F (2.4%) post-crizotinib and L2086F (3.6%), G2032R/L2086F (3.6%), G2032R/S1986F/L2086F (3.6%), and S1986F/L2000V (3.6%) post-lorlatinib. Structural modeling predicted ROS1^L2086F causes steric interference to lorlatinib, crizotinib, and entrectinib, while it may accommodate cabozantinib. In Ba/F3 models, ROS1^L2086F, ROS1^{G2032R/L2086F}, and ROS1^{S1986F/G2032R/L2086F} were refractory to lorlatinib but sensitive to cabozantinib. A patient with disease progression on crizotinib and lorlatinib and ROS1 L2086F received cabozantinib for nearly 11 months with disease control. Among lorlatinib-resistant biopsies, we also identified MET amplification (4%), KRAS G12C (4%), KRAS amplification (4%), NRAS mutation (4%), and MAP2K1 mutation (4%).

CONCLUSIONS

ROS1 mutations mediate resistance to crizotinib and lorlatinib in more than one third of cases, underscoring the importance of developing next-generation ROS1 inhibitors with potency against these mutations, including G2032R and L2086F. Continued efforts are needed to elucidate ROS1-independent resistance mechanisms.

Brain Penetration of Lorlatinib: Cumulative Incidences of CNS and Non-CNS Progression with Lorlatinib in Patients with Previously Treated ALK-Positive Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Background

Lorlatinib is a potent, third-generation ALK/ROS1 tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) designed to penetrate the blood–brain barrier.

Objective

We report the cumulative incidence of central nervous system (CNS) and non-CNS progression with lorlatinib in patients with ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) previously treated with ALK TKIs.

Patients and methods

In an ongoing phase II study (NCT01970865), 198 patients with ALK-positive NSCLC with ≥ 1 prior ALK TKI were enrolled into expansion cohorts (EXP) based on treatment history. Patients received lorlatinib 100 mg once daily. Patients were analyzed for progressive disease, categorized as CNS or non-CNS progression, by independent central review. Cumulative incidence probabilities were calculated adopting a competing risks approach.

Results

Fifty-nine patients received crizotinib as their only prior ALK TKI (EXP2–3A); cumulative incidence rates (CIRs) of CNS and non-CNS progression were both 22% at 12 months in patients with baseline CNS metastases (n = 37), and CIR of non-CNS progression at 12 months was higher versus that for CNS progression in patients without baseline CNS metastases [43% vs. 9% (n = 22)]. In patients who received ≥ 1 prior second-generation ALK TKI [EXP3B–5 (n = 139)], CIR of non-CNS progression at 12 months was higher versus that for CNS progression in patients both with and without baseline CNS metastases (35% vs. 23% (n = 94) and 55% vs. 12% (n = 45), respectively).

Conclusions

Lorlatinib showed substantial intracranial activity in patients with pretreated ALK-positive NSCLC, with or without baseline CNS metastases, whose disease progressed on crizotinib or second-generation ALK TKIs.

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier

NCT01970865.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s11523-020-00702-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Intracranial and extracranial efficacy of lorlatinib in patients with ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer previously treated with second-generation ALK TKIs

BACKGROUND

Lorlatinib, a potent, brain-penetrant, third-generation anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), has substantial activity against ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study assessed the overall, intracranial, and extracranial efficacy of lorlatinib in ALK-positive NSCLC that progressed on second-generation ALK TKIs.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In the ongoing phase II study (NCT01970865), patients with ALK-positive advanced NSCLC treated with ≥1 prior second-generation ALK TKI ± chemotherapy were enrolled in expansion cohorts (EXP) based on treatment history. Overall, intracranial and extracranial antitumor activity were assessed independently per modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1.

RESULTS

Of the 139 patients with ≥1 prior second-generation ALK TKI (EXP3B-5), 28 received one prior second-generation ALK TKI (EXP3B), 65 two prior ALK TKIs (EXP4), and 46 three prior ALK TKIs (EXP5). In EXP3B-5, the objective response rate (ORR) [95% confidence intervals] was 39.6% (31.4-48.2), intracranial ORR (IC-ORR) was 56.1% (42.4-69.3), extracranial ORR (EC-ORR) was 36.7% (28.7-45.3), median duration of response (DOR) was 9.6 months [5.6-16.7; IC-DOR, 12.4 (6.0-37.1); EC-DOR, 9.7 (6.1-33.3)], median progression-free survival was 6.6 (5.4-7.4) months, and median overall survival was 20.7 months (16.1-30.3). In EXP3B, the ORR was 42.9% (24.5-62.8), the IC-ORR was 66.7% (29.9-92.5), and the EC-ORR was 32.1% (15.9-52.4). In EXP4 and EXP5, the ORR was 38.7% (29.6-48.5), the IC-ORR was 54.2% (39.2-68.6), and the EC-ORR was 37.8% (28.8-47.5).

CONCLUSIONS

Lorlatinib had clinically meaningful intracranial and extracranial antitumor activity in the post-second-generation ALK TKI setting, with elevated intracranial versus extracranial ORR, particularly in patients with fewer lines of therapy.

A Phase 2 Study of Capmatinib in Patients With MET-Altered Lung Cancer Previously Treated With a MET Inhibitor

INTRODUCTION

Capmatinib is approved for MET exon 14-altered NSCLC on the basis of activity in targeted therapy-naive patients. We conducted a phase 2 study to assess the efficacy of capmatinib in patients previously treated with a MET inhibitor.

METHODS

Patients with advanced NSCLC harboring MET amplification or MET exon 14 skipping alterations received capmatinib 400 mg twice daily. The primary end point was the objective response rate. Secondary end points included progression-free survival, disease control rate (DCR), intracranial response rate, and overall survival. Circulating tumor DNA was analyzed to identify capmatinib resistance mechanisms.

RESULTS

A total of 20 patients were enrolled between May 2016 and November 2019, including 15 patients with MET skipping alterations and five patients with MET amplification. All patients had received crizotinib; three had also received other MET-directed therapies. The median interval between crizotinib and capmatinib was 22 days (range: 4-374). Two patients (10%) achieved an objective response to capmatinib and 14 had stable disease, yielding a DCR of 80%. Among five patients who discontinued crizotinib for intolerance, the DCR was 83%, including two patients with the best tumor shrinkage of -25% and -28%. Intracranial DCR among four patients with measurable brain metastases was 100%, with no observed intracranial objective responses. Overall, the median progression-free survival and overall survival were 5.5 (95% confidence interval: 1.3-11.0) and 11.3 (95% confidence interval: 5.5-not reached) months, respectively. MET D1228 and Y1230 mutations and MAPK alterations were recurrently detected in postcrizotinib, precapmatinib plasma. New and persistent MET mutations and MAPK pathway alterations were detected in plasma at progression on capmatinib.

CONCLUSIONS

Capmatinib has modest activity in crizotinib-pretreated MET-altered NSCLC, potentially owing to overlapping resistance mechanisms.

First-Line Lorlatinib or Crizotinib in Advanced ALK-Positive Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND

Lorlatinib, a third-generation inhibitor of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK), has antitumor activity in previously treated patients with ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The efficacy of lorlatinib, as compared with that of crizotinib, as first-line treatment for advanced ALK-positive NSCLC is unclear.

METHODS

We conducted a global, randomized, phase 3 trial comparing lorlatinib with crizotinib in 296 patients with advanced ALK-positive NSCLC who had received no previous systemic treatment for metastatic disease. The primary end point was progression-free survival as assessed by blinded independent central review. Secondary end points included independently assessed objective response and intracranial response. An interim analysis of efficacy was planned after approximately 133 of 177 (75%) expected events of disease progression or death had occurred.

RESULTS

The percentage of patients who were alive without disease progression at 12 months was 78% (95% confidence interval [CI], 70 to 84) in the lorlatinib group and 39% (95% CI, 30 to 48) in the crizotinib group (hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.19 to 0.41; P<0.001). An objective response occurred in 76% (95% CI, 68 to 83) of the patients in the lorlatinib group and 58% (95% CI, 49 to 66) of those in the crizotinib group; among those with measurable brain metastases, 82% (95% CI, 57 to 96) and 23% (95% CI, 5 to 54), respectively, had an intracranial response, and 71% of the patients who received lorlatinib had an intracranial complete response. The most common adverse events with lorlatinib were hyperlipidemia, edema, increased weight, peripheral neuropathy, and cognitive effects. Lorlatinib was associated with more grade 3 or 4 adverse events (mainly altered lipid levels) than crizotinib (in 72% vs. 56%). Discontinuation of treatment because of adverse events occurred in 7% and 9% of the patients, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In an interim analysis of results among patients with previously untreated advanced ALK-positive NSCLC, those who received lorlatinib had significantly longer progression-free survival and a higher frequency of intracranial response than those who received crizotinib. The incidence of grade 3 or 4 adverse events was higher with lorlatinib than with crizotinib because of the frequent occurrence of altered lipid levels. (Funded by Pfizer; CROWN ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03052608.).

Outcomes According to ALK Status Determined by Central IHC or FISH in Patients with ALK-Positive NSCLC Enrolled in the Phase III ALEX Study

INTRODUCTION

We retrospectively examined progression-free survival (PFS) and response by ALK fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH) status in patients with advanced ALK immunohistochemistry (IHC)-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in the ALEX study.

METHODS

303 treatment-naïve patients were randomized to receive twice-daily alectinib 600 mg or crizotinib 250 mg. ALK status was assessed centrally using Ventana ALK (D5F3) CDx IHC and Vysis ALK Break Apart FISH Probe Kit. Primary endpoint: investigator-assessed PFS. Secondary endpoints of interest: objective response rate (ORR) and duration.

RESULTS

Investigator-assessed PFS was significantly prolonged with alectinib versus crizotinib in ALK IHC-positive/FISH-positive tumors (n = 203, 67%) (HR 0.37, 95% CI: 0.25-0.56) and ALK IHC-positive/FISH-uninformative tumors (n = 61, 20%) (HR 0.39, 95% CI: 0.20-0.78), but not ALK IHC-positive/FISH-negative tumors (n = 39, 13%) (HR 1.33, 95% CI: 0.6-3.2). ORRs were higher with alectinib versus crizotinib in ALK IHC-positive/FISH-positive tumors 90.6% versus 81.4%; stratified odds ratio [OR] 2.22, 95% CI: 0.97-5.07) and ALK IHC-positive/FISH-uninformative tumors (96.0% versus 75.0%; OR 9.29, 95% CI: 1.05-81.88), but not ALK IHC-positive/FISH-negative tumors (28.6% versus 44.4%; OR 0.45, 95% CI: 0.12-1.74). Next-generation sequencing (NGS) was performed in 35/39 patients with ALK IHC-positive/FISH-negative tumors; no ALK fusion was identified in 20/35 (57.1%) patients by NGS, but 10/20 (50.0%) had partial response/stable disease.

CONCLUSION

Outcomes of patients with ALK IHC-positive/FISH-positive and ALK IHC-positive/FISH-uninformative NSCLC were similar to the overall ALEX population. These results suggest that Ventana ALK IHC is a standard testing method for selecting patients for treatment with alectinib.

BRG1 Loss Predisposes Lung Cancers to Replicative Stress and ATR Dependency

Inactivation of SMARCA4/BRG1, the core ATPase subunit of mammalian SWI/SNF complexes, occurs at very high frequencies in non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC). There are no targeted therapies for this subset of lung cancers, nor is it known how mutations in BRG1 contribute to lung cancer progression. Using a combination of gain- and loss-of-function approaches, we demonstrate that deletion of BRG1 in lung cancer leads to activation of replication stress responses. Single-molecule assessment of replication fork dynamics in BRG1-deficient cells revealed increased origin firing mediated by the prelicensing protein, CDC6. Quantitative mass spectrometry and coimmunoprecipitation assays showed that BRG1-containing SWI/SNF complexes interact with RPA complexes. Finally, BRG1-deficient lung cancers were sensitive to pharmacologic inhibition of ATR. These findings provide novel mechanistic insight into BRG1-mutant lung cancers and suggest that their dependency on ATR can be leveraged therapeutically and potentially expanded to BRG1-mutant cancers in other tissues. SIGNIFICANCE: These findings indicate that inhibition of ATR is a promising therapy for the 10% of non-small cell lung cancer patients harboring mutations in SMARCA4/BRG1. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: http://cancerres.aacrjournals.org/content/canres/80/18/3841/F1.large.jpg.

Abstract CT025: Impact of the EML4-ALK fusion variant on the efficacy of lorlatinib in patients (pts) with ALK-positive advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

BACKGROUND: Lorlatinib is a selective, potent, brain-penetrant, 3rd-generation (gen) ALK/ROS1 tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) preclinically active against most known ALK resistance mutations. In pts with ALK+ advanced NSCLC with disease progression following 2nd-gen ALK TKIs, lorlatinib has shown robust clinical activity and we found that tumor genotyping for ALK mutations may identify such pts more likely to respond to lorlatinib treatment. Prior analyses have suggested that EML4-ALK variant type may influence ALK TKI treatment benefit. To further identify molecular correlates of response, we performed an exploratory subgroup analysis by EML4-ALK variant type and ALK resistance mutations in pts previously treated with 2nd-gen ALK TKIs and who received the recommended Ph 2 dose of lorlatinib (100 mg once daily). METHODS: Baseline plasma samples were collected from pts with ALK+ NSCLC with ≥1 prior 2nd-gen ALK TKI enrolled in the ongoing registrational Ph 2 study (NCT01970865). Circulating free DNA (cfDNA) was analyzed using Guardant360 (Guardant Health, Inc., CA, USA) to determine EML4-ALK variant and ALK kinase domain mutations. Objective response rate (ORR) and duration of response (DOR), by independent central review, were evaluated according to EML4-ALK variant type and ALK resistance mutation status. RESULTS: ALK fusions were detectable in 64 (41.0%) of 156 pt plasma samples. EML4-ALK variants 1, 2, and 3 were detected at frequency of 17.3%, 2.6% and 15.4%, respectively. Other EML4-ALK variants (including the variant types 4, 5, 7, and 8) were also detected in 3.2% of pts, as well as some other less frequent fusion partners (e.g., KIF5B) in 2.6% of pts. Based on cfDNA, ALK resistance mutations were detected in 40 pts; of whom, 6 pts harbored EML4-ALK variant 1, 1 pt had variant 2 and 18 had variant 3. The G1202R/Del mutation was detected in 23 pts samples; of which, 15 (65.2%) also harbored EML4-ALK variant 3. ORR was 33.3% (95% CI 16.5-54.0), 75.0% (95% CI 19.4-99.4) and 45.8% (95% CI 25.6-67.2) for variants 1, 2 and 3, respectively, while median DOR was similar for pts with variant 1 or 3 (both 6.9 months). Median DOR was not reached for variant 2. Of note, no responses were observed in the pts with other types of ALK rearrangements detected. Finally, ALK fusions were not detected in the cfDNA of 92 pts (59.0%), including 12 pts who had detectable ALK mutations. Among these 92 pts, ORR was 39.1% (95% CI 29.1-49.9) and median DOR was 7.1 months (95% C 5.5-not reached). Confirmation of these results in the tumor tissue is ongoing. CONCLUSION: In this heavily pretreated group of ALK+ NSCLC pts, the presence of an ALK resistance mutation might enrich for EML4-ALK variants 1 and 3. Lorlatinib exhibited antitumor activity irrespective of EML4-ALK variant and across a variety of ALK resistance mutations.

Citation Format: Todd M. Bauer, Jean-François Martini, Benjamin Besse, Chia-Chi Lin, Ross A. Soo, Gregory J. Riely, Sai-Hong Ignatius Ou, Francesca Toffalorio, Antonello Abbattista, Holger Thurm, D. Ross Camidge, Steven Kao, Rita Chiari, Shirish Gadgeel, Enriqueta Felip, Alice T. Shaw, Benjamin J. Solomon. Impact of the EML4-ALK fusion variant on the efficacy of lorlatinib in patients (pts) with ALK-positive advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research 2020; 2020 Apr 27-28 and Jun 22-24. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(16 Suppl):Abstract nr CT025.

Association between circulating tumor DNA burden and disease burden in patients with ALK-positive lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Plasma genotyping is an emerging approach for the identification of genetic alterations mediating resistance to anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-targeted therapy. The authors reviewed plasma genotyping and imaging findings to assess the correlation between circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) burden and disease burden in patients with ALK-positive lung cancer.

METHODS

The authors analyzed 97 plasma specimens from 75 patients with ALK-positive lung cancer to identify ALK and non-ALK alterations. Disease burden was estimated by tabulating lesions per organ and calculating lesion diameters, areas, and volumes. Disease burden was correlated with the allelic frequency (AF) of plasma alterations.

RESULTS

The mean interval between plasma collection and imaging was 8 days. ctDNA was detected in approximately 85% of plasma specimens. An ALK fusion and ALK mutation were detected in 79% and 76%, respectively, of plasma specimens. Using the maximum plasma alteration AF and maximum ALK alteration AF as independent surrogates of ctDNA burden, a higher disease burden measurement on imaging was found to be associated with higher ctDNA burden. Total body and extrathoracic tumor volume but not intrathoracic tumor volume correlated with ctDNA burden. Of all the disease sites assessed, the ctDNA burden correlated most with involvement of the liver, bones, and adrenal glands. Despite being the defining alteration in ALK-positive lung cancer, isolated plasma ALK fusion AF did not perform as well as the maximum plasma alteration AF or maximum ALK alteration AF for correlating tumor burden.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with ALK-positive lung cancer, the maximum plasma alteration AF and maximum ALK alteration AF correlate with the extrathoracic burden of disease and are more predictive of tumor burden compared with the ALK fusion AF alone.

LAY SUMMARY

Analysis of genetic material shed from cancer cells into the circulation offers insights into the molecular composition of tumors. The circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) varies over time and across individuals and is impacted by the distribution of disease. Herein, the authors estimated tumor burden on imaging and correlated it with ctDNA by calculating the maximum allelic frequency. The current study findings demonstrated that the greatest correlation exists between extrathoracic, extracranial tumor burden (particularly involvement of the liver, adrenal glands, or bones) and ctDNA burden, suggesting a biological basis for the interpatient and temporal intrapatient differences in ctDNA yield that have been described in previous studies.

Small cell transformation of ROS1 fusion-positive lung cancer resistant to ROS1 inhibition

Histologic transformation from non-small cell to small cell lung cancer has been reported as a resistance mechanism to targeted therapy in EGFR-mutant and ALK fusion-positive lung cancers. Whether small cell transformation occurs in other oncogene-driven lung cancers remains unknown. Here we analyzed the genomic landscape of two pre-mortem and 11 post-mortem metastatic tumors collected from an advanced, ROS1 fusion-positive lung cancer patient, who had received sequential ROS1 inhibitors. Evidence of small cell transformation was observed in all metastatic sites at autopsy, with inactivation of RB1 and TP53, and loss of ROS1 fusion expression. Whole-exome sequencing revealed minimal mutational and copy number heterogeneity, suggestive of "hard" clonal sweep. Patient-derived models generated from autopsy retained features consistent with small cell lung cancer and demonstrated resistance to ROS1 inhibitors. This case supports small cell transformation as a recurring resistance mechanism, and underscores the importance of elucidating its biology to expand therapeutic opportunities.

A Phase II Study of the Multikinase Inhibitor Ponatinib in Patients With Advanced, RET-Rearranged NSCLC

Introduction

RET rearrangements define a distinct molecular subset of NSCLC. The multikinase inhibitor ponatinib reveals potent activity in preclinical models of RET-rearranged NSCLC.

Methods

In this single-arm, multicenter, phase II trial, we evaluated the clinical activity of ponatinib in patients with advanced, previously treated, RET-rearranged NSCLC (NCT01813734). RET rearrangements were identified through fluorescence in situ hybridization or next-generation sequencing. Ponatinib was administered at a dose of 30 mg once daily. Patients without a documented objective response were eligible to dose-escalate ponatinib to 45 mg daily. The primary end point was objective response rate.

Results

Between August 2014 and December 2017, nine patients were enrolled. The median age was 58 years (range 49–73 y). Eight patients (89%) had a history of brain metastases. The median number of previous lines of therapy was three (range 1–5). Of the nine evaluated patients, five (55%) experienced tumor shrinkage from baseline, but no confirmed responses were observed (objective response rate 0%). The disease control rate was 55%. With a median follow-up of 9.33 months, the median progression-free survival and overall survival were 3.80 months (95% CI: 1.83–5.30) and 17.47 months (95% CI: 6.57–19.20), respectively. The most common treatment-related adverse events were rash (n = 5; 56%), constipation (n = 4; 44%), and diarrhea (n = 4; 44%). No treatment-related thromboembolic or cardiac events were observed. The study was stopped prematurely owing to slow accrual and lack of clinical activity.

Conclusions

Ponatinib has limited clinical activity in patients with RET-rearranged NSCLC. Continued development of more potent and selective RET inhibitors is needed.

Imaging Features and Metastatic Patterns of Advanced ALK-Rearranged Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

OBJECTIVE.ALK rearrangements are an established targetable oncogenic driver in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The goal of this study was to determine the imaging features of the primary tumor and metastatic patterns in advanced ALK-rearranged (ALK+) NSCLC that may be different from those in EGFR-mutant (EGFR+) or EGFR/ALK wild-type (EGFR-/ALK-) NSCLC. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Patients with advanced ALK+, EGFR+, or EGFR-/ALK- NSCLC were retrospectively identified. Two radiologists concurrently assessed the imaging features of the primary tumor and the distribution of metastases in these patients. RESULTS. We identified a cohort of 333 patients with metastatic NSCLC (119 ALK+ cases, 116 EGFR+ cases, and 98 EGFR-/ALK- cases). Compared with EGFR+ and EGFR-/ALK- NSCLC, the primary tumor in ALK+ NSCLC was more likely to be located in the lower lobes (53% of ALK+, 34% of EGFR+, and 36% of EGFR-/ALK- tumors; p < 0.05), less likely to be subsolid (1% of ALK+, 11% of EGFR+, and 8% of EGFR-/ALK- tumors; p < 0.02), and less likely to have air bronchograms (7% of ALK+, 28% of EGFR+, and 29% of EGFR-/ALK- tumors; p < 0.01). Compared with EGFR+ and EGFR-/ALK- tumors, ALK+ tumors had higher frequencies of distant nodal metastasis (20% of ALK+ tumors vs 2% of EGFR+ and 9% of EGFR-/ALK- tumors; p < 0.05) and lymphangitic carcinomatosis (37% of ALK+ tumors vs 12% of EGFR+ and 12% of EGFR-/ALK- tumors; p < 0.01), but ALK+ tumors had a lower frequency of brain metastasis compared with EGFR+ tumors (24% vs 41%; p = 0.01). Although there was no statistically significant difference in the frequencies of bone metastasis among the three groups, sclerotic bone metastases were more common in the ALK+ tumors (22% vs 7% of EGFR+ tumors and 6% of EGFR-/ALK- tumors; p < 0.01). CONCLUSION. Advanced ALK+ NSCLC has primary tumor imaging features and patterns of metastasis that are different from those of EGFR+ or EGFR-/ALK- wild type NSCLC at the time of initial presentation.

Impact of lorlatinib on patient-reported outcomes in patients with advanced ALK-positive or ROS1-positive non-small cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate patient-reported outcomes (PROs) from a phase 1/2 study (NCT01970865) in patients with anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)- or ROS1-positive advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with lorlatinib 100 mg once daily.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

PRO measures, including global quality of life (QoL), functioning domains and symptoms, were assessed by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (QLQ-C30) and the 13-item Lung Cancer (QLQ-LC13) module. Mean changes of absolute scores from baseline were assessed. Percentages of patients showing improvement, stability or worsening on each scale were reported, with a change of ≥10 points considered clinically meaningful (CM).

RESULTS

255 patients completed baseline and ≥1 post-baseline PRO assessment. Most patients had CM improvement (42.4 %) or stable (38.0 %) scores for global QoL. Functioning domains with the greatest proportion of patients with improved scores were role (37.6 %) and emotional (36.9 %); only one domain had more patients showing worsening than improving function (cognitive [24.3 % vs 22.4 %]). Most patients showed improved or stable scores for disease-related symptoms. No QLQ-C30 symptom domains had more patients worsening than improving. Symptoms on the QLQ-C30 scale with the greatest proportion of patients with improved scores were fatigue (49.4 %) and insomnia (46.3 %). Four QLQ-LC13 domains had more patients worsening than improving (two most affected were peripheral neuropathy [37.3 % vs 13.7 %] and alopecia [19.2 % vs 13.3 %]). Symptoms on the QLQ-LC13 scale with the greatest proportion of patients with improved scores were cough (42.7 %) and pain in other parts (32.9 %).

CONCLUSIONS

Lorlatinib treatment showed CM improvement from baseline in global QOL that was maintained over time. Additionally, there were improvements in physical, emotional, social, and role functioning. Improvements were shown in appetite loss and key symptoms such as pain, dyspnea, cough and fatigue; a worsening in peripheral neuropathy was noted.

MET Alterations Are a Recurring and Actionable Resistance Mechanism in ALK-Positive Lung Cancer

PURPOSE

Most ALK-positive lung cancers will develop ALK-independent resistance after treatment with next-generation ALK inhibitors. MET amplification has been described in patients progressing on ALK inhibitors, but frequency of this event has not been comprehensively assessed.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

We performed FISH and/or next-generation sequencing on 207 posttreatment tissue (n = 101) or plasma (n = 106) specimens from patients with ALK-positive lung cancer to detect MET genetic alterations. We evaluated ALK inhibitor sensitivity in cell lines with MET alterations and assessed antitumor activity of ALK/MET blockade in ALK-positive cell lines and 2 patients with MET-driven resistance.

RESULTS

MET amplification was detected in 15% of tumor biopsies from patients relapsing on next-generation ALK inhibitors, including 12% and 22% of biopsies from patients progressing on second-generation inhibitors or lorlatinib, respectively. Patients treated with a second-generation ALK inhibitor in the first-line setting were more likely to develop MET amplification than those who had received next-generation ALK inhibitors after crizotinib (P = 0.019). Two tumor specimens harbored an identical ST7-MET rearrangement, one of which had concurrent MET amplification. Expressing ST7-MET in the sensitive H3122 ALK-positive cell line induced resistance to ALK inhibitors that was reversed with dual ALK/MET inhibition. MET inhibition resensitized a patient-derived cell line harboring both ST7-MET and MET amplification to ALK inhibitors. Two patients with ALK-positive lung cancer and acquired MET alterations achieved rapid responses to ALK/MET combination therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with next-generation ALK inhibitors, particularly in the first-line setting, may lead to MET-driven resistance. Patients with acquired MET alterations may derive clinical benefit from therapies that target both ALK and MET.

Clinicopathologic Characteristics of BRG1-Deficient NSCLC

INTRODUCTION

Ten percent of NSCLCs harbor mutations in SMARCA4, the gene encoding the SWItch/Sucrose Non-Fermentable ATPase BRG1. In preclinical models, BRG1 inactivation increases tumor aggressiveness but enhances sensitivity to drugs that target oxidative phosphorylation and inhibit SMARCA2, EZH2, CDK4, or CDK6. To facilitate translation of preclinical findings into clinical studies exploiting these therapeutic vulnerabilities, we assessed the clinical features of patients with tumors harboring BRG1-inactivating mutations.

METHODS

Data sets from Massachusetts General Hospital and Foundation Medicine were reviewed to determine the prevalence of SMARCA4-mutant NSCLC and describe its clinicopathologic characteristics. BRG1 expression was evaluated by immunohistochemistry and correlated with SMARCA4 mutations. Treatment outcomes were retrospectively assessed.

RESULTS

We detected SMARCA4 genomic alterations in 9% (n = 117 of 1422) and 11% (n = 3188 of 27,281) of NSCLCs in the institutional and Foundation Medicine data sets, respectively. In both cohorts, truncating mutations comprised over one-third of SMARCA4 alterations. Twenty-nine of 64 SMARCA4-mutant NSCLCs (45%) assessed for BRG1 expression reported loss of expression, most (90%) of which had truncating SMARCA4 mutations. Overall, 84% (n = 26 of 31) of evaluated NSCLCs with truncating SMARCA4 mutations lacked BRG1 expression. Deficient BRG1 expression was predominantly detected in adenocarcinomas with co-occurring mutations in KRAS, TP53, KEAP1, and STK11. Among patients with BRG1-deficient NSCLC who received first-line platinum doublet chemotherapy (n = 11) or chemotherapy plus immunotherapy (n = 5), median progression-free survival was 38 days and 35 days, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

BRG1 deficiency is enriched in NSCLCs with truncating SMARCA4 mutations. Clinical outcomes are poor in this molecular subgroup, highlighting the importance of developing novel strategies to target unique vulnerabilities associated with the BRG1-deficient state.

Correlation of extent of ALK FISH positivity and crizotinib efficacy in three prospective studies of ALK-positive patients with non-small-cell lung cancer

Background

In clinical trials of patients with anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with crizotinib, evaluation of the relationship between the percentage of ALK-positive cells by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH)-particularly near the cut-off defining positive status-and clinical outcomes have been limited by small sample sizes.

Patients and methods

Data were pooled from three large prospective trials (one single-arm and two randomized versus chemotherapy) of crizotinib in patients with ALK-positive NSCLC determined by Vysis ALK Break Apart FISH using a cut-off of ≥15% ALK-positive cells. Logistic regression and proportional hazards regression analyses were used to explore the association of percent ALK-positive cells with objective response and progression-free survival (PFS), respectively.

Results

Of 11 081 screened patients, 1958 (18%) were ALK positive, 7512 (68%) were ALK negative, and 1540 (14%) were uninformative. Median percentage of ALK-positive cells was 58% in ALK-positive patients and 2% in ALK-negative patients. Of ALK-positive patients, 5% had 15%-19% ALK-positive cells; of ALK-negative patients, 2% had 10%-14% ALK-positive cells. Objective response rate for ALK-positive, crizotinib-treated patients with ≥20% ALK-positive cells was 56% (n = 700/1246), 55% (n = 725/1312) for those with ≥15% ALK-positive cells, and 38% for those with 15%-19% ALK-positive cells (n = 25/66). As a continuous variable, higher percentages of ALK-positive cells were estimated to be associated with larger differences in objective response and PFS between crizotinib and chemotherapy; however, tests for interaction between treatment and percentage of ALK-positive cells were not significant (objective response, P = 0.054; PFS, P = 0.17).

Conclusions

Patients with ALK-positive NSCLC benefit from treatment with crizotinib across the full range of percentage of ALK-positive cells, supporting the clinical utility of the 15% cut-off. The small number of patients with scores near the cut-off warrant additional study given the potential for misclassification of ALK status due to technical or biologic reasons.

Entrectinib in ROS1 fusion-positive non-small-cell lung cancer: integrated analysis of three phase 1-2 trials

BACKGROUND

Recurrent gene fusions, such as ROS1 fusions, are oncogenic drivers of various cancers, including non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Up to 36% of patients with ROS1 fusion-positive NSCLC have brain metastases at the diagnosis of advanced disease. Entrectinib is a ROS1 inhibitor that has been designed to effectively penetrate and remain in the CNS. We explored the use of entrectinib in patients with locally advanced or metastatic ROS1 fusion-positive NSCLC.

METHODS

We did an integrated analysis of three ongoing phase 1 or 2 trials of entrectinib (ALKA-372-001, STARTRK-1, and STARTRK-2). The efficacy-evaluable population included adult patients (aged ≥18 years) with locally advanced or metastatic ROS1 fusion-positive NSCLC who received entrectinib at a dose of at least 600 mg orally once per day, with at least 12 months' follow-up. All patients had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2, and previous cancer treatment (except for ROS1 inhibitors) was allowed. The primary endpoints were the proportion of patients with an objective response (complete or partial response according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1) and duration of response, and were evaluated by blinded independent central review. The safety-evaluable population for the safety analysis included all patients with ROS1 fusion-positive NSCLC in the three trials who received at least one dose of entrectinib (irrespective of dose or duration of follow-up). These ongoing studies are registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02097810 (STARTRK-1) and NCT02568267 (STARTRK-2), and EudraCT, 2012-000148-88 (ALKA-372-001).

FINDINGS

Patients were enrolled in ALKA-372-001 from Oct 26, 2012, to March 27, 2018; in STARTRK-1 from Aug 7, 2014, to May 10, 2018; and in STARTRK-2 from Nov 19, 2015 (enrolment is ongoing). At the data cutoff date for this analysis (May 31, 2018), 41 (77%; 95% CI 64-88) of 53 patients in the efficacy-evaluable population had an objective response. Median follow-up was 15·5 monhts (IQR 13·4-20·2). Median duration of response was 24·6 months (95% CI 11·4-34·8). In the safety-evaluable population, 79 (59%) of 134 patients had grade 1 or 2 treatment-related adverse events. 46 (34%) of 134 patients had grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events, with the most common being weight increase (ten [8%]) and neutropenia (five [4%]). 15 (11%) patients had serious treatment-related adverse events, the most common of which were nervous system disorders (four [3%]) and cardiac disorders (three [2%]). No treatment-related deaths occurred.

INTERPRETATION

Entrectinib is active with durable disease control in patients with ROS1 fusion-positive NSCLC, and is well tolerated with a manageable safety profile, making it amenable to long-term dosing in these patients. These data highlight the need to routinely test for ROS1 fusions to broaden therapeutic options for patients with ROS1 fusion-positive NSCLC.

FUNDING

Ignyta/F Hoffmann-La Roche.

Entrectinib in patients with advanced or metastatic NTRK fusion-positive solid tumours: integrated analysis of three phase 1-2 trials

BACKGROUND

Entrectinib is a potent inhibitor of tropomyosin receptor kinase (TRK) A, B, and C, which has been shown to have anti-tumour activity against NTRK gene fusion-positive solid tumours, including CNS activity due to its ability to penetrate the blood-brain barrier. We present an integrated efficacy and safety analysis of patients with metastatic or locally advanced solid tumours harbouring oncogenic NTRK1, NTRK2, and NTRK3 gene fusions treated in three ongoing, early-phase trials.

METHODS

An integrated database comprised the pivotal datasets of three, ongoing phase 1 or 2 clinical trials (ALKA-372-001, STARTRK-1, and STARTRK-2), which enrolled patients aged 18 years or older with metastatic or locally advanced NTRK fusion-positive solid tumours who received entrectinib orally at a dose of at least 600 mg once per day in a capsule. All patients had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2 and could have received previous anti-cancer therapy (except previous TRK inhibitors). The primary endpoints, the proportion of patients with an objective response and median duration of response, were evaluated by blinded independent central review in the efficacy-evaluable population (ie, patients with NTRK fusion-positive solid tumours who were TRK inhibitor-naive and had received at least one dose of entrectinib). Overall safety evaluable population included patients from STARTRK-1, STARTRK-2, ALKA-372-001, and STARTRK-NG (NCT02650401; treating young adult and paediatric patients [aged ≤21 years]), who received at least one dose of entrectinib, regardless of tumour type or gene rearrangement. NTRK fusion-positive safety evaluable population comprised all patients who have received at least one dose of entrectinib regardless of dose or follow-up. These ongoing studies are registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02097810 (STARTRK-1) and NCT02568267 (STARTRK-2), and EudraCT, 2012-000148-88 (ALKA-372-001).

FINDINGS

Patients were enrolled in ALKA-372-001 from Oct 26, 2012, to March 27, 2018; in STARTRK-1 from Aug 7, 2014, to May 10, 2018; and in STARTRK-2 from Nov 19, 2015 (enrolment is ongoing). At the data cutoff date for this analysis (May 31, 2018) the efficacy-evaluable population comprised 54 adults with advanced or metastatic NTRK fusion-positive solid tumours comprising ten different tumour types and 19 different histologies. Median follow-up was 12.9 months (IQR 8·77-18·76). 31 (57%; 95% CI 43·2-70·8) of 54 patients had an objective response, of which four (7%) were complete responses and 27 (50%) partial reponses. Median duration of response was 10 months (95% CI 7·1 to not estimable). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events in both safety populations were increased weight (seven [10%] of 68 patients in the NTRK fusion-positive safety population and in 18 [5%] of 355 patients in the overall safety-evaluable population) and anaemia (8 [12%] and 16 [5%]). The most common serious treatment-related adverse events were nervous system disorders (three [4%] of 68 patients and ten [3%] of 355 patients). No treatment-related deaths occurred.

INTERPRETATION

Entrectinib induced durable and clinically meaningful responses in patients with NTRK fusion-positive solid tumours, and was well tolerated with a manageable safety profile. These results show that entrectinib is a safe and active treatment option for patients with NTRK fusion-positive solid tumours. These data highlight the need to routinely test for NTRK fusions to broaden the therapeutic options available for patients with NTRK fusion-positive solid tumours.

FUNDING

Ignyta/F Hoffmann-La Roche.

Clinical activity of programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) blockade in never, light, and heavy smokers with non-small-cell lung cancer and PD-L1 expression ≥50

Background:

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are standard therapies for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and a programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) tumor proportion score (TPS) ≥50%. Tumor mutation burden (TMB) also predicts response to ICIs but is often not available in real time for decision making in the first-line setting. Smoking exposure can be a proxy for TMB in NSCLC. The impact of smoking status on efficacy of PD-1 blockade in NSCLC patients with PD-L1 TPS ≥50% has not been well defined.

Patients and methods:

To investigate the relationship between smoking and activity of ICIs in NSCLC, we retrospectively studied 315 patients with NSCLC and PD-L1 TPS ≥50% at five USA academic medical centers. Objective response rates (ORRs), progression-free survival (PFS), and duration of response (DOR) were compared between never (<100 lifetime cigarettes), light (≤10 pack-years), and heavy (>10 pack-years) smokers. A subset of patients underwent next-generation sequencing to estimate TMB.

Results:

We identified 36 (11%) never, 42 (13%) light, and 237 (75%) heavy smokers with NSCLC and PD-L1 TPS ≥50% treated with ICIs. Objective responses were observed in 27%, 40%, and 40% of never, light, and heavy smokers, respectively (P = 0.180 never versus heavy; P = 1.000 light versus heavy). Median PFS and median DOR were numerically shorter in never and light smokers compared with heavy smokers (PFS 3.0 versus 4.0 versus 5.4 months; median DOR 6.9 versus 10.8 versus 17.8 months), but were not statistically different [PFS: hazard ratio (HR) 1.37, P = 0.135 and HR 1.24, P = 0.272; DOR: HR 1.92, P = 0.217 and HR 1.79, P = 0.141].

Conclusions:

PD-(L)1 inhibitors are associated with antitumor activity in NSCLC with PD-L1 TPS ≥50% regardless of smoking status. Nevertheless, there is a signal of potentially decreased durability among never and light smokers that should be further evaluated. Distinct immunobiologic features may affect initial response versus durability of antitumor immunity to programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) blockade.

Activity of the Hsp90 inhibitor luminespib among non-small-cell lung cancers harboring EGFR exon 20 insertions

Background

There are currently no approved targeted therapies for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with EGFR exon 20 insertions (ins20), a subgroup of EGFR mutations that are generally refractory to first/second generation EGFR inhibitors. We report the final results of a phase II trial evaluating the activity of the Hsp90 inhibitor luminespib (AUY922) in NSCLC patients with EGFR ins20.

Patients and methods

Twenty-nine patients with stage IV NSCLC with EGFR ins20 identified on local testing and at least one prior therapy were enrolled on the trial between August 2013 and October 2016. The primary end point was objective response rate (ORR), with a pre-determined target rate of effectiveness [defined as the rate of partial response (PR) plus stable disease (SD) lasting ≥3 months] of 20%. Secondary end points were PFS, overall survival (OS), safety and response by EGFR ins20 subtype.

Results

Among the 29 patients (18 females, median age 60 years) the ORR was 17%, median progression-free survival was 2.9 months (95% CI 1.4-5.6) and median OS (mOS) was 13 months (95% CI 4.9-19.5). The results exceeded the pre-determined target rate of effectiveness with 11/29 (38%) patients having a PR or an SD ≥3 months. The most common luminespib-related toxicities were diarrhea (83%), visual changes (76%) and fatigue (45%). All study treatment was stopped on 28 February 2017 due to dissolution of study drug availability; 3 patients were on treatment at study termination.

Conclusion

The study met its primary end point, suggesting that luminespib may be an active therapy for advanced NSCLC patients with EGFR ins20. Luminespib is generally well-tolerated, though reversible low-grade ocular toxicity is common. Further study of luminespib and other hsp90 inhibitors in this population is warranted.

Study registration (ClinicalTrials.gov)

NCT01854034.

Final Overall Survival and Other Efficacy and Safety Results From ASCEND-3: Phase II Study of Ceritinib in ALKi-Naive Patients With ALK-Rearranged NSCLC

INTRODUCTION

The phase II, single-arm ASCEND-3 study assessed the efficacy and safety of ceritinib in anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitor (ALKi)-naive patients with ALK-rearranged NSCLC who had received at least three previous lines of chemotherapy. Here, we report the final efficacy and safety results.

METHODS

Eligible patients (including those with asymptomatic or neurologically stable brain metastases) received oral ceritinib (750 mg/day, fasted). The primary end point was investigator-assessed overall response rate (ORR). Secondary end points were Blinded Independent Review Committee-assessed ORR; investigator- and Blinded Independent Review Committee-assessed overall intracranial response rate, duration of response, time to response, disease control rate, and progression-free survival (PFS); overall survival (OS); and safety. Exploratory end points included patient-reported outcomes.

RESULTS

Of the 124 patients enrolled, 122 (98.4%) had received previous antineoplastic medications (31 patients [25.0%] received at least three regimens), and 49 (39.5%) had baseline brain metastases. The median follow-up time (data cutoff: January 22, 2018) was 52.1 (range, 48.4-60.1) months. The investigator-assessed ORR was 67.7% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 58.8-75.9), and the median PFS was 16.6 months (95% CI: 11.0-23.2). The median OS was 51.3 months (95% CI: 42.7-55.3). Most common adverse events (all grades, ≥60% of patients, all-causality) were diarrhea (85.5%), nausea (78.2%), and vomiting (71.8%). Overall, 18 patients (14.5%) had an adverse event leading to treatment discontinuation. Health-related quality of life was maintained during ceritinib treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Ceritinib exhibited prolonged and clinically meaningful OS, PFS, and duration of response in chemotherapy-pretreated (at least three lines), ALKi-naive patients with ALK+ NSCLC. The safety profile was consistent with that reported in previous studies.

Time To Response In Patients With Advanced Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase (ALK)-Positive Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Receiving Alectinib In The Phase II NP28673 And NP28761 Studies

Introduction

Alectinib is a highly selective and potent ALK inhibitor, approved for the treatment of patients with metastatic ALK+ NSCLC based on results from the Phase II global NP28673 (NCT01801111) and North American NP28761 (NCT01871805) studies.

Methods

This exploratory analysis of two Phase II studies of alectinib (NP28673/NP28761) investigated time to systemic response (TTR) and time to central nervous system (CNS) response (TTCR) in patients with previously treated advanced anaplastic lymphoma kinase fusion gene-positive (ALK+) non-small-cell lung cancer. Patients (n=225) received 600 mg oral alectinib twice daily and had scans every 6/8 weeks (NP28673/NP28761).

Results

For NP28673 and NP28761, respectively: median follow-up was 21.3 months/17.0 months; most responders (72.6%/82.9%) responded by the first disease assessment; median TTR was 8 weeks (95% confidence interval [CI]: 8.00-8.14)/6 weeks (95% CI: 5.86-6.14); median TTCR in responders with measurable baseline CNS disease was 8 weeks (95% CI: 7.86-10.29)/6 weeks (95% CI: 5.71-not evaluable). Similar results were observed regardless of measurable/non-measurable disease.

Discussion

These data suggest that alectinib achieves a rapid response in patients, both systemically and in the CNS.

Alectinib versus crizotinib in treatment-naive anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive (ALK+) non-small-cell lung cancer: CNS efficacy results from the ALEX study

Background

The phase III ALEX study in patients with treatment-naive advanced anaplastic lymphoma kinase mutation-positive (ALK+) non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) met its primary end point of improved progression-free survival (PFS) with alectinib versus crizotinib. Here, we present detailed central nervous system (CNS) efficacy data from ALEX.

Patients and methods

Overall, 303 patients aged ≥18 years underwent 1:1 randomization to receive twice-daily doses of alectinib 600 mg or crizotinib 250 mg. Brain imaging was conducted in all patients at baseline and every subsequent 8 weeks. End points (analyzed by subgroup: patients with/without baseline CNS metastases; patients with/without prior radiotherapy) included PFS, CNS objective response rate (ORR), and time to CNS progression.

Results

In total, 122 patients had Independent Review Committee-assessed baseline CNS metastases (alectinib, n = 64; crizotinib, n = 58), 43 had measurable lesions (alectinib, n = 21; crizotinib, n = 22), and 46 had received prior radiotherapy (alectinib, n = 25; crizotinib, n = 21). Investigator-assessed PFS with alectinib was consistent between patients with baseline CNS metastases [hazard ratio (HR) 0.40, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.25–0.64] and those without (HR 0.51, 95% CI: 0.33–0.80, P interaction = 0.36). Similar results were seen in patients regardless of prior radiotherapy. Time to CNS progression was significantly longer with alectinib versus crizotinib and comparable between patients with and without baseline CNS metastases (P < 0.0001). CNS ORR was 85.7% with alectinib versus 71.4% with crizotinib in patients who received prior radiotherapy and 78.6% versus 40.0%, respectively, in those who had not.

Conclusion

Alectinib demonstrated superior CNS activity and significantly delayed CNS progression versus crizotinib in patients with previously untreated, advanced ALK+ NSCLC, irrespective of prior CNS disease or radiotherapy.

Clinical trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02075840

ALK Mutation Status Before and After Alectinib Treatment in Locally Advanced or Metastatic ALK-Positive NSCLC: Pooled Analysis of Two Prospective Trials

INTRODUCTION

The effectiveness of ALK receptor tyrosine kinase (ALK) inhibitors can be limited by the development of ALK resistance mutations. This exploratory analysis assessed the efficacy of alectinib in patients with NSCLC and ALK point mutations using pooled data from two single-arm phase II studies.

METHODS

Studies NP28673 and NP28761 enrolled adults with locally advanced/metastatic ALK-positive NSCLC who had progressed on crizotinib. ALK mutation analysis was conducted on cell-free DNA from 187 patients post-crizotinib/pre-alectinib, and from 49 of these patients who subsequently progressed on alectinib.

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics were generally balanced across patient subgroups. At baseline, 34 distinct ALK mutations were identified in 48 of 187 patients (25.7%). Median investigator-assessed progression-free survival was longer in patients without ALK single-nucleotide variants (n = 138) versus those with (n = 48): 10.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 8.1-14.3) versus 5.6 months (95% CI: 4.5-10.9), respectively. Sixteen of 32 patients (50%) with ALK resistance mutations to crizotinib achieved an investigator-assessed response to alectinib (all partial responses); most of these ALK mutations were known to be sensitive to alectinib. Analysis of plasma samples obtained post-progression on alectinib revealed that 26 of 49 (53%) samples harbored 16 distinct ALK mutations, with known alectinib-resistance mutations, I1171 T/N/S, G1202R, and V1180L, observed in 15 of 49 (31%) tumors.

CONCLUSIONS

Alectinib appears clinically active against ALK rearrangements and mutations, as well as several ALK variants that can cause resistance to crizotinib. The use of cell-free DNA in plasma samples may be an alternative noninvasive method for monitoring resistance mutations during therapy.

Efficacy of Platinum/Pemetrexed Combination Chemotherapy in ALK-Positive NSCLC Refractory to Second-Generation ALK Inhibitors

INTRODUCTION

The current standard initial therapy for advanced ALK receptor tyrosine kinase (ALK)-positive NSCLC is a second-generation ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) such as alectinib. The optimal next-line therapy after failure of a second-generation ALK TKI remains to be established; however, standard options include the third-generation ALK TKI lorlatinib or platinum/pemetrexed-based chemotherapy. The efficacy of platinum/pemetrexed-based chemotherapy has not been evaluated in cases that are refractory to second-generation TKIs.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study performed at three institutions. Patients were eligible if they had advanced ALK-positive NSCLC refractory to one or more second-generation ALK TKI(s) and had received platinum/pemetrexed-based chemotherapy.

RESULTS

Among 58 patients eligible for this study, 37 had scans evaluable for response with measurable disease at baseline. The confirmed objective response rate to platinum/pemetrexed-based chemotherapy was 29.7% (11 of 37 patients; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 15.9% - 47.0%), with median duration of response of 6.4 months (95% CI: 1.6 months - not reached). The median progression-free survival for the entire cohort was 4.3 months (95% CI: 2.9 - 5.8 months). Progression-free survival was longer in patients who received platinum/pemetrexed in combination with an ALK TKI compared to those who received platinum/pemetrexed alone (6.8 months vs. 3.2 months, respectively; hazard ratio = 0.33; p = 0.025).

CONCLUSIONS

Platinum/pemetrexed-based chemotherapy shows modest efficacy in ALK-positive NSCLC after failure of second-generation ALK TKIs. The activity may be higher if administered with an ALK TKI, suggesting a potential role for continued ALK inhibition.

Lorlatinib in advanced ROS1-positive non-small-cell lung cancer: a multicentre, open-label, single-arm, phase 1-2 trial

BACKGROUND

Lorlatinib is a potent, brain-penetrant, third-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) that targets ALK and ROS1 with preclinical activity against most known resistance mutations in ALK and ROS1. We investigated the antitumour activity and safety of lorlatinib in advanced, ROS1-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

In this open-label, single-arm, phase 1-2 trial, we enrolled patients (aged ≥18 years) with histologically or cytologically confirmed advanced ROS1-positive NSCLC, with or without CNS metastases, with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 2 or less (≤1 for phase 1 only) from 28 hospitals in 12 countries worldwide. Lorlatinib 100 mg once daily (escalating doses of 10 mg once daily to 100 mg twice daily in phase 1 only) was given orally in continuous 21-day cycles until investigator-determined disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, or death. The primary endpoint was overall and intracranial tumour response, assessed by independent central review. Activity endpoints were assessed in patients who received at least one dose of lorlatinib. This study is ongoing and is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01970865.

FINDINGS

Between Jan 22, 2014, and Oct 2, 2016, we assessed 364 patients, of whom 69 with ROS1-positive NSCLC were enrolled. 21 (30%) of 69 patients were TKI-naive, 40 (58%) had previously received crizotinib as their only TKI, and eight (12%) had previously received one non-crizotinib ROS1 TKI or two or more ROS1 TKIs. The estimated median duration of follow-up for response was 21·1 months (IQR 15·2-30·3). 13 (62%; 95% CI 38-82) of 21 TKI-naive patients and 14 (35%; 21-52) of 40 patients previously treated with crizotinib as their only TKI had an objective response. Intracranial responses were achieved in seven (64%; 95% CI 31-89) of 11 TKI-naive patients and 12 (50%; 29-71) of 24 previous crizotinib-only patients. The most common grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events were hypertriglyceridaemia (13 [19%] of 69 patients) and hypercholesterolaemia (ten [14%]). Serious treatment-related adverse events occurred in five (7%) of 69 patients. No treatment-related deaths were reported.

INTERPRETATION

Lorlatinib showed clinical activity in patients with advanced ROS1-positive NSCLC, including those with CNS metastases and those previously treated with crizotinib. Because crizotinib-refractory patients have few treatment options, lorlatinib could represent an important next-line targeted agent.

FUNDING

Pfizer.

Computed Tomography Imaging Features and Distribution of Metastases in ROS1-rearranged Non-Small-cell Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND

ROS proto-oncogene 1 (ROS1) rearrangements are a known molecular target in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Our goal was to determine whether ROS1-rearranged NSCLC has imaging features and patterns of metastasis, which differ from those of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-rearranged or epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant NSCLC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively identified patients with metastatic ROS1-rearranged, ALK-rearranged, or EGFR-mutant NSCLC from January 2014 to June 2018 and included those with pretreatment imaging studies available. We assessed the imaging features of the primary tumor and the distribution of metastases in these patients. The Wilcoxon rank-sum test and Fisher exact test were used to compare the imaging features.

RESULTS

We identified 257 patients (167 women and 90 men; median age, 56 years; range, 19-90 years) with metastatic NSCLC (ROS1, 53; ALK, 87; EGFR, 117). Compared with ALK-rearranged or EGFR-mutant NSCLC, ROS1-rearranged NSCLC was less likely to present with extrathoracic metastases (ROS1, 49%; ALK, 75%; EGFR, 72%; P < .01), including brain metastases (ROS1, 9%; ALK, 25%; EGFR, 40%; P < .04). Compared with EGFR-mutant NSCLC, ROS1-rearranged tumors were more likely to exhibit imaging features of lymphangitic carcinomatosis (ROS1, 42%; EGFR, 12%; P < .01) and less likely to have air bronchograms in the primary tumor (ROS1, 2%; EGFR, 28%; P < .01). ROS1-rearranged tumors were also more likely to present with distant nodal metastases (ROS1, 15%; EGFR, 2%; P < .01) and sclerotic-type bone metastases (ROS1, 17%; EGFR, 6%; P < .01).

CONCLUSION

Although considerable overlap exists in the imaging features of ROS1-rearranged, ALK-rearranged, and EGFR-mutant NSCLC, we found that ROS1-rearranged NSCLC has certain distinct imaging features and patterns of spread.

Identification of osimertinib-resistant EGFR L792 mutations by cfDNA sequencing: oncogenic activity assessment and prevalence in large cfDNA cohort

Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) next-generation sequencing has the potential to capture tumor heterogeneity and genomic evolution under treatment pressure in a non-invasive manner. Here, we report the detection of EGFR L792 mutations, a non-covalent mechanism of osimertinib resistance, using Guardant360 cfDNA testing in a patient with metastatic EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) whose disease progressed on osimertinib. We subsequently analyzed a large cohort of over 1800 additional patient samples harboring an EGFR T790M mutation and identified a concomitant L792 mutation in a total of 22 (1.2%) cases. In vitro functional assays demonstrated that the EGFR L858R/T790M/L792F/H mutations conferred intermediate-level resistance to osimertinib. Further understanding of potential acquired resistance mechanisms to targeted therapy may help inform treatment strategy in EGFR-mutant NSCLC.

Combination Olaparib and Temozolomide in Relapsed Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is an aggressive malignancy in which inhibitors of PARP have modest single-agent activity. We performed a phase I/II trial of combination olaparib tablets and temozolomide (OT) in patients with previously treated SCLC. We established a recommended phase II dose of olaparib 200 mg orally twice daily with temozolomide 75 mg/m² daily, both on days 1 to 7 of a 21-day cycle, and expanded to a total of 50 patients. The confirmed overall response rate was 41.7% (20/48 evaluable); median progression-free survival was 4.2 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 2.8-5.7]; and median overall survival was 8.5 months (95% CI, 5.1-11.3). Patient-derived xenografts (PDX) from trial patients recapitulated clinical OT responses, enabling a 32-PDX coclinical trial. This revealed a correlation between low basal expression of inflammatory-response genes and cross-resistance to both OT and standard first-line chemotherapy (etoposide/platinum). These results demonstrate a promising new therapeutic strategy in SCLC and uncover a molecular signature of those tumors most likely to respond. SIGNIFICANCE: We demonstrate substantial clinical activity of combination olaparib/temozolomide in relapsed SCLC, revealing a promising new therapeutic strategy for this highly recalcitrant malignancy. Through an integrated coclinical trial in PDXs, we then identify a molecular signature predictive of response to OT, and describe the common molecular features of cross-resistant SCLC.See related commentary by Pacheco and Byers, p. 1340.This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 1325.

Treatment with Next-Generation ALK Inhibitors Fuels Plasma ALK Mutation Diversity

PURPOSE

Acquired resistance to next-generation ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) is often driven by secondary ALK mutations. Here, we investigated utility of plasma genotyping for identifying ALK resistance mutations at relapse on next-generation ALK TKIs.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

We analyzed 106 plasma specimens from 84 patients with advanced ALK-positive lung cancer treated with second- and third-generation ALK TKIs using a commercially available next-generation sequencing (NGS) platform (Guardant360). Tumor biopsies from TKI-resistant lesions underwent targeted NGS to identify ALK mutations.

RESULTS

By genotyping plasma, we detected an ALK mutation in 46 (66%) of 70 patients relapsing on a second-generation ALK TKI. When post-alectinib plasma and tumor specimens were compared, there was no difference in frequency of ALK mutations (67% vs. 63%), but plasma specimens were more likely to harbor ≥2 ALK mutations (24% vs. 2%, P = 0.004). Among 29 patients relapsing on lorlatinib, plasma genotyping detected an ALK mutation in 22 (76%), including 14 (48%) with ≥2 ALK mutations. The most frequent combinations of ALK mutations were G1202R/L1196M and D1203N/1171N. Detection of ≥2 ALK mutations was significantly more common in patients relapsing on lorlatinib compared with second-generation ALK TKIs (48% vs. 23%, P = 0.017). Among 15 patients who received lorlatinib after a second-generation TKI, serial plasma analysis demonstrated that eight (53%) acquired ≥1 new ALK mutations on lorlatinib.

CONCLUSIONS

ALK resistance mutations increase with each successive generation of ALK TKI and may be underestimated by tumor genotyping. Sequential treatment with increasingly potent ALK TKIs may promote acquisition of ALK resistance mutations leading to treatment-refractory compound ALK mutations.

Abstract 442: Repotrectinib, a next generation TRK inhibitor, overcomes TRK resistance mutations including solvent front, gatekeeper and compound mutations

Oncogenic TRKA/B/C fusions are identified in multiple cancer types in adults and children. TRK inhibitors (TRKis) have demonstrated marked efficacy in patients with these cancers, however, acquired on-target resistance mediated by kinase domain mutations can occur. Next-generation TRKis targeting both wildtype and mutant TRK fusions can address this unmet need. Repotrectinib was designed to potently inhibit wildtype (WT) TRKs and overcome resistance mutations. The anti-proliferative activity of 1st generation (larotrectinib/entrectinib) and next-generation (repotrectinib/LOXO-195) TRKis were compared using engineered Ba/F3 cells expressing WT or mutated TRKs (Table). Repotrectinib was over 10-fold more potent than LOXO-195 against WT TRK fusions and solvent front mutations (SFMs), and more than 100-fold more potent against the gatekeeper mutations TRKA F589L and TRKC F617I. Furthermore, repotrectinib was the only TRKi active against the compound mutation TRKA G595R/F589L in cis in preclinical Ba/F3 cells. In xenograft tumor models, repotrectinib led to significant tumor regression in tumors carrying WT or mutated TRK fusions. In the ongoing TRIDENT-1 phase 1 clinical trial of repotrectinib (NCT03093116), the SFMs TRKA G595R, TRKC G623R and TRKC G623E and the gatekeeper mutation TRKA F589L were detected in plasma cfDNA samples at baseline from three TRKi-resistant patients. Repotrectinib was active against ETV6-TRKC G623E in an entrectinib-resistant patient with a salivary gland tumor (-82%, confirmed partial response, RECIST v1.1). Tumor regression (-33%) was achieved in a larotrectinib-resistant cholangiocarcinoma patient with LMNA-TRKA G595R and F589L mutations in trans. TRIDENT-1 is currently enrolling NTRK fusion-positive patients with advanced solid tumors.

Ba/F3 Cell Proliferation Assay IC50 (nM)LMNA-TRKAETV6-TRKBETV6-TRKCTRK InhibitorWTG595RG667CF589LG595R/F589LWTG639RWTG623RG623EF617IRepotrectinib&lt;0.10.19.2&lt;0.117.4&lt;0.13.2&lt;0.10.40.9&lt;0.2LOXO-1958.613.194.931.6531.11.028.41.724.649.153Larotrectinib15.918981863625.31000013.1300023.2699921625000Entrectinib0.3614186.7&lt;0.220000.220000.41340171261.7

Citation Format: Alexander Drilon, Dayong Zhai, Wei Deng, Xin Zhang, Dong Lee, Evan Rogers, Jeffrey Whitten, Zhongdong Huang, Armin Graber, Juliet Liu, Shanna Stopatschinskaja, J. Jean Cui, Dong-Wan Kim, Byoung Chul Cho, Robert C. Doebele, Sai-Hong Ignatius Ou, Jeeyun Lee, Alice T. Shaw. Repotrectinib, a next generation TRK inhibitor, overcomes TRK resistance mutations including solvent front, gatekeeper and compound mutations [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 442.

Crizotinib in ROS1-rearranged advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC): updated results, including overall survival, from PROFILE 1001

BACKGROUND

In the ongoing phase I PROFILE 1001 study, crizotinib showed antitumor activity in patients with ROS1-rearranged advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Here, we present updated antitumor activity, overall survival (OS) and safety data (additional 46.2 months follow-up) for patients with ROS1-rearranged advanced NSCLC from PROFILE 1001.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

ROS1 status was determined by FISH or reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction. All patients received crizotinib at a starting dose of 250 mg twice daily.

RESULTS

Fifty-three patients received crizotinib, with a median duration of treatment of 22.4 months. At data cut-off, treatment was ongoing in 12 patients (23%). The objective response rate (ORR) was 72% [95% confidence interval (CI), 58% to 83%], including six confirmed complete responses and 32 confirmed partial responses; 10 patients had stable disease. Responses were durable (median duration of response 24.7 months; 95% CI, 15.2-45.3). ORRs were consistent across different patient subgroups. Median progression-free survival was 19.3 months (95% CI, 15.2-39.1). A total of 26 deaths (49%) occurred (median follow-up period of 62.6 months), and of the remaining 27 patients (51%), 14 (26%) were in follow-up at data cut-off. Median OS was 51.4 months (95% CI, 29.3 to not reached) and survival probabilities at 12, 24, 36, and 48 months were 79%, 67%, 53%, and 51%, respectively. No correlation was observed between OS and specific ROS1 fusion partner. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were mainly grade 1 or 2, per CTCAE v3.0. There were no grade ≥4 TRAEs and no TRAEs associated with permanent discontinuation. No new safety signals were reported with long-term crizotinib treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings serve as a new benchmark for OS in ROS1-rearranged advanced NSCLC, and continue to show the clinically meaningful benefit and safety of crizotinib in this molecular subgroup.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT00585195.