1
|
Agirrezabal I, Pereira Grillo Junior LS, Nasser F, Brennan VK, Bugano D, Galastri FL, Azeredo-da-Silva ALFD, Shergill S, da Motta-Leal-Filho JM. Cost-effectiveness of selective internal radiation therapy with Y-90 resin microspheres for intermediate- and advanced-stage hepatocellular carcinoma in Brazil. J Med Econ 2023; 26:731-741. [PMID: 37139828 DOI: 10.1080/13696998.2023.2210475] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/05/2023]
Abstract
AimsHepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a severe condition with poor prognosis that places a significant burden on patients, caregivers, and healthcare systems. Selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) is a treatment available to patients with HCC which addresses some of the limitations of alternative treatment options. A cost-effectiveness analysis was undertaken into the use of SIRT using Y-90 resin microspheres for the treatment of unresectable, intermediate- and late-stage HCC in Brazil.Materials and methodsA partitioned-survival model was developed, including a tunnel state for patients downstaged to receive treatments with curative intent. Sorafenib was the selected comparator, a common systemic treatment in Brazil and for which comparative evidence exists. Clinical data were extracted from published sources of pivotal trials, and effectiveness was measured in quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and life-years (LYs). The analysis was conducted from the Brazilian private payer perspective and a lifetime horizon was implemented. Comprehensive sensitivity analyses were conducted.ResultsLYs and QALYs were higher for SIRT with Y-90 resin microspheres versus sorafenib (0.27 and 0.20 incremental LYs and QALYs, respectively) and costs were slightly higher for SIRT (R$15,864). The base case incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was R$77,602 per QALY. The ICER was mostly influenced by parameters defining the sorafenib overall survival curve and SIRT had a 73% probability of being cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay threshold of R$135,761 per QALY (three times the per-capita gross domestic product in Brazil). Overall, sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the results indicating that SIRT with Y-90 resin microspheres is cost-effective compared with sorafenib.LimitationsA rapidly evolving treatment landscape in Brazil and worldwide, and the lack of local data for some variables were the main limitations.ConclusionsSIRT with Y-90 resin microspheres is a cost-effective option compared with sorafenib in Brazil.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ion Agirrezabal
- Sirtex Medical Europe GmbH, Joseph-Schumpeter-Allee 33, 53227 Bonn, Germany
| | - Luiz Sérgio Pereira Grillo Junior
- AFECC - Hospital Santa Rita de Cássia, Av. Mal. Campos, 1579 - Santa Cecilia, Vitória - ES, 29043-260, Brazil
- Unimed Vitória - Hospital Unimed Vitória, R. Marins Alvarino, 365 - Itararé, Vitória - ES, 29047-660, Brazil
| | - Felipe Nasser
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, Av. Albert Einstein, 627, São Paulo, SP, 05652-900, Brazil
| | - Victoria K Brennan
- Sirtex Medical United Kingdom Ltd., Hill House, 1 Little New Street, London, EC4A 3TR, United Kingdom
| | - Diogo Bugano
- Centro de Oncologia do Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, Rua Ruggero Fasano, s/n., Bloco A - 3° Subsolo, São Paulo, SP, 05653-120, Brazil
| | - Francisco Leonardo Galastri
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, Av. Albert Einstein, 627, São Paulo, SP, 05652-900, Brazil
| | - André Luis F de Azeredo-da-Silva
- Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre, Brazil
- HTAnalyze Consultoria e Treinamento Ltda, Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | - Suki Shergill
- Sirtex Medical United Kingdom Ltd., Hill House, 1 Little New Street, London, EC4A 3TR, United Kingdom
| | - Joaquim Maurício da Motta-Leal-Filho
- Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, Av. Dr. Arnaldo, 251, Cerqueira Cesar, São Paulo, SP, 01246-000, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Pachito DV, de Azeredo-da-Silva ALF, de Oliveira PRBP, Bagattini ÂM, Basso J, Gehres LG, Mallmann ÉDB, Rodrigues ÁS, Riera R, Gadenz SD. Telehealth Strategies to Support Referral Management to Secondary Care in Brazil: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis. Value Health Reg Issues 2022; 31:74-80. [PMID: 35568011 DOI: 10.1016/j.vhri.2022.03.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2021] [Revised: 02/16/2022] [Accepted: 03/11/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study aimed to assess the cost-effectiveness of a remotely operated referral management system (RORMS) compared with a conventional referral management system (CRMS) in Brazil. METHODS This is a model-based cost-effectiveness analysis under the perspective of the Unified Healthcare System (Sistema Único de Saúde [SUS]) in Brazil. A Markov microsimulation model was developed to compare costs and referral outcomes of the RORMS and the CRMS. Model consisted of 4 states representative of sequential stepwise assessments of referral suitability, 3 states representative of referral outcomes, and 1 exit model state. Target population represented cases being referred from primary healthcare units to specialized care in SUS. Model inputs related to costs and effectiveness in the RORMS arm were obtained from the data set of a RORMS between July and December 2019. Model inputs for the CRMS model arm were obtained from administrative data sets of 2 Brazilian localities for the year 2019. Relative effect size of RORMS in comparison with CRMS in SUS was obtained from published studies. Effectiveness outcome was unnecessary referrals averted. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was calculated for the base case. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis was conducted. RESULTS In the base-case analyses, RORMS dominated CRMS, with expected cost-savings from $50.42 to $80.62 per unnecessary referral averted. RORMS was the dominant strategy in 83.7% of 100 000 simulations in the probabilistic sensitivity analysis. In 16.2% of simulations, incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was between $0 and $222 per unnecessary referral averted. CONCLUSIONS Model-based simulations indicate that the RORMS is likely to be cost saving in comparison with the CRMS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Josué Basso
- Regula Mais Brasil, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | | | | - Átila S Rodrigues
- Ministry of Health, Brazil; Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (Unifesp), São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Rachel Riera
- Núcleo de Avaliação de Tecnologias em Saúde, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | |
Collapse
|