1
|
Verreck EEF, van Steenhoven JEC, Kuijer A, van Maaren MC, Simons JM, Siesling S, van Dalen T. Trends of Axillary Treatment in Sentinel Node-Positive Breast Cancer Patients Undergoing Mastectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:5623-5632. [PMID: 37225832 PMCID: PMC10409658 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-13568-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2023] [Accepted: 04/11/2023] [Indexed: 05/26/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The ACOSOG-Z0011- and the AMAROS-trial obviated the need for axillary surgery in most sentinel node-positive (SLN+) breast cancer patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery (BCS). Data for patients who undergo mastectomy is scarce. The purpose of this study was to investigate patterns of axillary treatment in SLN+ patients treated by mastectomy in the years after the publication of landmark studies regarding axillary treatment in SLN+ breast cancer patients undergoing BCS. METHODS This was a population-based study in cT1-3N0M0 breast cancer patients treated by mastectomy and staged as SLN+ between 2009 and 2018. The performance of an axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) and/or administration of postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) were primary outcomes and were studied over time. RESULTS The study included 10,633 patients. The frequency of ALND performance decreased from 78% in 2009 to 10% in 2018, whereas PMRT increased from 4 to 49% (P < 0.001). In ≥N1a patients, ALND performance decreased from 93 to 20%, whereas PMRT increased to 70% (P < 0.001). In N1mi and N0itc patients, ALND was abandoned during the study period, whereas PMRT increased to 38% and 13% respectively (P < 0.001), respectively. Age, tumor subtype, N-stage, and hospital type affected the likelihood that patients underwent ALND. CONCLUSIONS In this study in SLN+ breast cancer patients undergoing mastectomy, use of ALND decreased drastically over time. By the end of 2018 most ≥N1a patients received PMRT as the only adjuvant axillary treatment, whereas the majority of N1mi and N0itc patients received no additional treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Julia E C van Steenhoven
- Department of Surgery, Diakonessenhuis Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Anne Kuijer
- Department of Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - Marissa C van Maaren
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Health Technology and Services Research, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Janine M Simons
- Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- GROW school for oncology and reproduction, MUMC+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Sabine Siesling
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Health Technology and Services Research, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Thijs van Dalen
- Department of Surgery, Diakonessenhuis Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Verreck EEF, van Steenhoven JEC, Kuijer A, van Maaren MC, Simons JM, Siesling S, van Dalen T. ASO Visual Abstract: Trends of Axillary Treatment in Sentinel Node-Positive Breast Cancer Patients Undergoing Mastectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:5635-5636. [PMID: 37318719 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-13621-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Julia E C van Steenhoven
- Department of Surgery, Diakonessenhuis Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Anne Kuijer
- Department of Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - Marissa C van Maaren
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Health Technology and Services Research, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Janine M Simons
- Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, MUMC+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Sabine Siesling
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Health Technology and Services Research, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Thijs van Dalen
- Department of Surgery, Diakonessenhuis Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
van Steenhoven JEC, van Maaren MC, Verreck EEF, Schipper RJ, Nieuwenhuijzen GAP, Kuijer A, Siesling S, van Dalen T. Inequalities in the omission of axillary dissection in sentinel lymph node positive patients in the Netherlands: Innovative hospitals are early adopters of a de-escalating approach. Int J Cancer 2023; 152:1378-1387. [PMID: 36522834 PMCID: PMC10108210 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.34400] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2022] [Revised: 09/29/2022] [Accepted: 10/05/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
During the last decade completion axillary lymph node dissection (cALND) was gradually omitted in sentinel lymph node positive (SLN+) breast cancer patients. However, adoption varies among hospitals. We analyzed factors associated with the omission of cALND in all Dutch SLN+ patients. As one of the focus hospital-related factors we defined "innovative" as the percentage of gene-expression profile (GEP) deployment within the indicated group of patients per hospital as a proxy for early adoption of innovations. cT1-2N0M0 SLN+ patients treated between 2011 and 2018 were selected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Hospitals were defined to be innovative based on their GEP use. Multivariable logistic regression (MLR) was performed to assess the relationship between innovative capacity, patient-, treatment- and hospital-related characteristics and cALND performance. 14 317 patients were included. Treatment in a hospital with high innovative capacity was associated with a lower probability of receiving cALND (OR 0.69, OR 0.46 and OR 0.35 in modestly, fairly and very innovative, respectively). Other factors associated with a lower probability of receiving a cALND were age 70 and 79 years and ≥79 years (ORs 0.59 [95% CI: 0.50-0.68] and 0.21 [95% CI: 0.17-0.26]) and treatment in an academic hospital (OR 0.41 [95% CI: 0.33-0.51]). Factors associated with an increased probability of undergoing cALND were HR-/HER2- tumors (OR 1.46 [95% CI: 1.19-1.80]), macrometastatic lymph node involvement (OR 6.37 [95% CI: 5.70-7.13]) and mastectomy (OR 4.57 [95% CI: 4.09-5.10]). Patients treated in a hospital that early adopted innovations were less likely to receive cALND. Our findings endorse the need for studies on barriers and facilitators of implementing innovations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia E C van Steenhoven
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Marissa C van Maaren
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,Department of Health Technology and Services Research, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | | | - Robert J Schipper
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | | | - Anne Kuijer
- Department of Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.,Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Sabine Siesling
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,Department of Health Technology and Services Research, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Thijs van Dalen
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kuijer A, Dominici LS, Rosenberg SM, Hu J, Gelber S, Di Lascio S, Wong JS, Ruddy KJ, Tamimi RM, Schapira L, Borges VF, Come SE, Sprunck-Harrild K, Partridge AH, King TA. Arm Morbidity After Local Therapy for Young Breast Cancer Patients. Ann Surg Oncol 2021; 28:6071-6082. [PMID: 33881656 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-09947-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2020] [Accepted: 03/12/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The impact of patient demographics and local therapy choice on arm morbidity in young breast cancer patients is understudied despite its importance given the long survivorship period. This study assessed patient-reported arm morbidity in the Young Women's Breast Cancer Study (YWS), a prospective cohort study. METHODS From 2006 to 2016, 1302 women with breast cancer diagnosed at the age of 40 years or younger enrolled in the YWS. The participants regularly complete surveys. The response rates are higher than 86%. Using the Breast Cancer Prevention Trial Checklist, this study examined the prevalence of patient-reported postoperative arm swelling and decreased range of motion (ROM) 1 year after diagnosis, stratified by local therapy strategy, in patients who had surgery for stages 1 to 3 disease. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify risk factors for arm morbidity. RESULTS Among 888 eligible participants (median age, 37 years), 14% reported arm swelling and 34% reported decreased ROM at 1 year. Arm swelling was reported by 23.6% of the patients who had axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) and 24.6% of the patients who received ALND and post-mastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT). In the multivariable analysis, the patients who reported being financially uncomfortable or who had ALND were at higher risk of arm swelling at 1 year. Being overweight, receiving ALND after sentinel lymph node biopsy, and receiving PMRT were associated with decreased ROM at 1 year. CONCLUSION High rates of self-reported arm morbidity in young breast cancer survivors were reported, particularly in patients receiving ALND and PMRT. Attention to the risks and benefits of differing local therapy strategies for ALND and PMRT patients is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne Kuijer
- Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA.,Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA.,Surgery, Antonius ziekenhuis, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - Laura S Dominici
- Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA.,Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Shoshana M Rosenberg
- Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.,Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jiani Hu
- Department of Data Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Shari Gelber
- Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Simona Di Lascio
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.,Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Julia S Wong
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Rulla M Tamimi
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Lidia Schapira
- Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford, CA, USA.,Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Virginia F Borges
- Medical Oncology, University of Colorado Cancer Center, Denver, CO, USA
| | - Steven E Come
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.,Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Ann H Partridge
- Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.,Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Tari A King
- Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA. .,Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA. .,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
van Steenhoven JEC, Kuijer A, Kornegoor R, van Leeuwen G, van Gorp J, van Dalen T, van Diest PJ. Assessment of tumour proliferation by use of the mitotic activity index, and Ki67 and phosphohistone H3 expression, in early-stage luminal breast cancer. Histopathology 2020; 77:579-587. [PMID: 32557844 PMCID: PMC7539961 DOI: 10.1111/his.14185] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2020] [Accepted: 06/11/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
AIMS Phosphohistone H3 (PhH3) has been proposed as a novel proliferation marker in breast cancer. This study compares the interobserver agreement for assessment of the mitotic activity index (MAI), Ki67 expression, and PhH3 in a cohort of oestrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer patients. METHODS AND RESULTS Tumour samples of 159 luminal breast cancer patients were collected. MAI and PhH3 scores were assessed by three breast cancer pathologists. Ki67 scores were assessed separately by two of the three pathologists. PhH3-positive cells were counted in an area of 2 mm2 , with a threshold of ≥13 positive cells being used to discriminate between low-proliferative and high-proliferative tumours. Ki67 expression was assessed with the global scoring method. Ki67 percentages of <20% were considered to be low. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Cohen's κ statistics were used to evaluate interobserver agreement. The impact on histological grading of replacing the MAI with PhH3 was assessed. Counting PhH3-positive cells was highly reproducible among all three observers (ICC of 0.86). The κ scores for the categorical PhH3 count (κ = 0.78, κ = 0.68, and κ = 0.80) reflected substantial agreement among all observers, whereas agreement for the MAI (κ = 0.38, κ = 0.52, and κ = 0.26) and Ki67 (κ = 0.55) was fair to moderate. When PhH3 was used to determine the histological grade, agreement in grading increased (PhH3, κ = 0.52, κ = 0.48, and κ = 0.52; MAI, κ = 0.43, κ = 0.35, and κ = 0.32), and the proportion of grade III tumours increased (14%, 18%, and 27%). CONCLUSION PhH3 seems to outperform Ki67 and the MAI as a reproducible means to measure tumour proliferation in luminal-type breast cancer. Variation in the assessment of histological grade might be reduced by using PhH3, but would result in an increase in the proportion of high-grade cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia E C van Steenhoven
- Department of SurgeryDiakonessenhuis UtrechtUtrechtThe Netherlands
- Department of PathologyUniversity Medical Centre UtrechtUtrecht UniversityUtrechtThe Netherlands
| | - Anne Kuijer
- Department of SurgerySt Antonius HospitalNieuwegeinThe Netherlands
| | | | - Gijs van Leeuwen
- Department of PathologySt Antonius HospitalNieuwegeinThe Netherlands
| | - Joost van Gorp
- Department of PathologySt Antonius HospitalNieuwegeinThe Netherlands
| | - Thijs van Dalen
- Department of SurgeryDiakonessenhuis UtrechtUtrechtThe Netherlands
| | - Paul J van Diest
- Department of PathologyUniversity Medical Centre UtrechtUtrecht UniversityUtrechtThe Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
van Steenhoven JEC, Kuijer A, van Maaren MC, Roos M, Elias SG, van Diest PJ, Siesling S, Smidt ML, Boersma LJ, van Dalen T. Quantifying the Mitigating Effects of Whole-Breast Radiotherapy and Systemic Treatments on Regional Recurrence Incidence Among Breast Cancer Patients. Ann Surg Oncol 2020; 27:3402-3411. [PMID: 32198570 PMCID: PMC7410865 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-020-08356-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Background Despite the potential for residual lymph node metastases after a negative or positive sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB), breast cancer patients rarely experience regional recurrences (RRs). This study aimed to quantify the effects of nonsurgical treatments on RR incidence among SLNB-negative (SLNB N0) breast cancer patients. Methods All primary SLNB N0-staged breast cancer patients with a diagnosis between 2005 and 2008 and 5-year follow-up data on recurrences were selected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. The cumulative incidence function (CIF) for RR was calculated as the first event at 5 years, taking into account any other first-event (local or distant recurrence, contralateral breast cancer, or death) as competing risk. Cox regression analysis was used to model the cause-specific hazard of RR developing as the first event to quantify the effect of adjuvant systemic therapy and whole-breast radiotherapy (RT) on RR incidence at 5 years. Results The study included 13,512 patients. Of these patients, 162 experienced an RR. The CIF of RR at 5 years was 1.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1–1.5%), whereas the CIFs for death and other events were 4.4% and 9.5%, respectively. Cox regression analysis showed hazard ratios (HRs) of 0.46 (95% CI 0.33–0.64), 0.31 (95% CI 0.18–0.55), and 0.40 (95% CI 0.24–0.67) respectively for patients treated by RT as a routine part of breast-conserving therapy (BCT), chemotherapy, and hormonal therapy. Conclusion RT as routine part of BCT, chemotherapy, and hormonal therapy independently exerted a mitigating effect on the risk for the development of RR. The three methods at least halved the risk. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1245/s10434-020-08356-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia E C van Steenhoven
- Department of Surgery, Diakonessenhuis Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands. .,Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - Anne Kuijer
- Department of Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - Marissa C van Maaren
- Department of Research, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,Department of Health Technology and Services Research, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Marleen Roos
- Department of Internal Medicine, Diakonessenhuis Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Sjoerd G Elias
- Department of Epidemiology, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Paul J van Diest
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Sabine Siesling
- Department of Research, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,Department of Health Technology and Services Research, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Marjolein L Smidt
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Maastricht, Maastrischt, The Netherlands
| | - Liesbeth J Boersma
- Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Thijs van Dalen
- Department of Surgery, Diakonessenhuis Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
van Steenhoven JE, den Dekker B, Kuijer A, Elias SG, van Diest PJ, Siesling S, van Dalen T. Abstract P2-14-19: Patients’ experience with 70-gene signature testing on adjuvant systemic treatment decisions: Results of a prospective cohort study. Cancer Res 2020. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs19-p2-14-19] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Early stage breast cancer patients are often confronted with uncertainty regarding the decision to undergo adjuvant chemotherapy (CT). Gene-expression profiles (GEP) are used to gain additional prognostic information and can influence adjuvant systemic treatment (AST) decisions. Little is known about patients’ experience with systemic treatment decisions and the impact of GEP use.
Patients and Methods: In a prospective, observational, multicenter study in estrogen receptor (ER) positive (+) patients in whom a 70-gene signature (70-GS) was used to support the decision to administer adjuvant chemotherapy, patients were asked to fill out an online questionnaire including their preference for systemic treatment regimens. The patient reported uncertainty regarding the choice to undergo adjuvant systemic treatment was measured prior and after the 70-GS test result with the 16-item decisional conflict scale (DCS) scale.
Results: Between 1 January 2017 and 31 December 2018, 106 patients were enrolled. Fifty-four percent of patients had N0, grade I/II, HER2-negative breast cancers, while 40% had N+ cancers. Before the 70-GS results were available, 58% of patients formulated a clear treatment preference, whereas 42% of patients felt unsure regarding their systemic treatment decisions (Fig 1). After disclosure of the 70-GS test result the percentage of patients who felt unsure about their treatment preference decreased considerably (from 42% to 5%, Fig 2). In addition, the patients’ final treatment decision was changed to the opposite in 34% of patients (CT to no CT or vice versa). Prior to the 70-GS test result, the mean total DCS-score at baseline was 34 (out of 100) and decreased to 23 after release of the 70-GS test result (P<0.001, table 1).
Conclusion: In this prospective, multicenter study in ER+/HER2- breast cancer patients, the use of the 70-GS strongly decreased the percentage of patients who felt unsure about their treatment preference, and changed patients’ CT treatment decisions for 34% of patients. Furthermore, use of the 70-GS resulted in a significant decrease in decisional conflict regarding their final treatment plan.
Table 1 CT preference and DCS-score prior and after release of the 70-GS test resultTreatment preference at baselineNo. of patientsTreatment preference after the 70-GS No. (%)DCS-score prior to 70-GSDCS-score after 70-GSP- value*No CT CT UnsureTotal1063423<0.001No CT5339(74)13(25)1(1)CT98(89)1(11)-Unsure4431(71)9(20)4(9)Abbreviations: CT, chemotherapy, 70-GS, 70-gene signature, DCS, Decisional Conflict Scale. There was a change in 34% of patients who had a clear pretest CT preference (ie, yes or no CT). The mean total DCS-score decreased from 34 of out 100 to 23 after release of the 70-GS test result. *P-value represents a paired T-test.
Citation Format: Julia E.C. van Steenhoven, Bianca den Dekker, Anne Kuijer, Sjoerd G. Elias, Paul J. van Diest, Sabine Siesling, Thijs van Dalen. Patients’ experience with 70-gene signature testing on adjuvant systemic treatment decisions: Results of a prospective cohort study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-14-19.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia E.C. van Steenhoven
- 1Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University and Department of Surgery, Diakonessenhuis Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Bianca den Dekker
- 2Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht Universtity, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Anne Kuijer
- 3Department of Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Nieuwegein, Netherlands
| | - Sjoerd G. Elias
- 4Department of Epidemiology, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Paul J. van Diest
- 5Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Sabine Siesling
- 6Department of Research, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation and Department of Health Technology and Services Research, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Utrecht, Enschede, Netherlands
| | - Thijs van Dalen
- 7Department of Surgery, Diakonessenhuis Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
van Steenhoven JE, Kuijer A, van Leeuwen AM, van Gorp JM, van Diest PJ, van Dalen T. Abstract P5-02-11: Assessment of tumor proliferation by mitotic activity index, phosphohistone H3 and Ki67 in early stage ER+/Her2- breast cancer. Cancer Res 2020. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs19-p5-02-11] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction: Determining expression of tumor proliferation by mitotic index or Ki67 expression is one of the strongest prognostic factors in breast cancer, but its reproducibility is not optimal. Recently, phosphohistone H3 (PHH3) was proposed as a novel marker specific for mitosis. For the present study, we hypothesized that counting PHH3 positive cells would be more reproducible than mitoses counting in H&E sections (MAI) and Ki67.
Methods: Tumor samples of 159 early breast cancer patients were immunohistochemically stained for Ki67 and PHH3. MAI and PHH3 scores were assessed by three breast cancer dedicated pathologists. Ki67 scores were assessed separately by two breast cancer pathologists. We used for Ki67 a threshold of 20% and for PHH3 the threshold score was 13. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Cohen’s κ statistics were used to assess inter-observer agreement. The impact of swapping mitotic index with PHH3 in histologic grading was assessed.
Results: The ICCs of PHH3 as a measure for inter-observer agreement on a continuous scale were 0.78 (obs. 1 vs. 2), 0.76 (obs. 2 vs. 3) and 0.97 (obs. 1 vs. 3). The PHH3 kappa scores (κ 0.78, 0.80, 0.68, table 1) were contrasted by fair to moderate inter-observer variation for Ki67 and MAI: Ki67, k 0.55 (obs. 1 and 2) and MAI k 0.38 (obs. 1 vs. 2), k 0.26 (obs. 2 vs. 3), k 0.56 (obs. 1 vs. 3). When using PHH3 in the Nottingham grading score instead of MAI, variation in histologic grading decreased (MAI k 0.43, 0.35, 0.32 vs. PHH3 k 0.52, 0.48, 0.52), while the proportion of grade III tumors increased (table 2).
Conclusion: PHH3 seems to outperform Ki67 and MAI as a reproducible measure for tumor proliferation in breast cancer. Variation in histologic grading might be improved by using PHH3, but the resulting increase of high-grade cancers remains to be addressed.
Table 1 The inter-observer agreement of PHH3 scored by three different breast cancer pathologistsObs. 2Obs. 3Obs. 3Obs. 1PHH3<13PHH3 ≥13PHH3<13PHH3 ≥13Obs. 2PHH3<13PHH3 ≥13PHH3<13583905PHH3<13597PHH3 ≥138371054PHH3 ≥13931Kappa0.780.800.67Abbreviations: PHH3, phosphohistone H3, Obs, observer.The concordance between obs. 1 & 2, obs. 1 & 3 and obs. 2 & 3 was 90%, 91% and 85%, respectively.
Table 2. The impact of swapping mitotic index with PHH3 in histologic gradingGrade I n(%)Grade II n(%)Grade III n(%)Observer 1H&E42(26)104(65)13(8)PHH330(19)77(48)52(33)Observer 2H&E35(33)62(58)9(8)PHH323(22)57(54)26(24)Observer 3H&E25(16)101(64)33(21)PHH320(13)90(56)49(31)Abbreviations: PHH3, phosphohistone H3, H&E, hematolylin and eosin
Citation Format: Julia E.C. van Steenhoven, Anne Kuijer, A. M. van Leeuwen, Joost M. van Gorp, Paul J. van Diest, Thijs van Dalen. Assessment of tumor proliferation by mitotic activity index, phosphohistone H3 and Ki67 in early stage ER+/Her2- breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-02-11.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia E.C. van Steenhoven
- 1Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University and Department of Surgery, Diakonessenhuis Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Anne Kuijer
- 2Department of Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Nieuwegein, Netherlands
| | - A. M. van Leeuwen
- 3Department of Pathology, St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Nieuwegein, Netherlands
| | - Joost M. van Gorp
- 3Department of Pathology, St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Nieuwegein, Netherlands
| | - Paul J. van Diest
- 4Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Thijs van Dalen
- 5Department of Surgery, Diakonessenhuis Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Poodt IGM, Spronk PER, Vugts G, van Dalen T, Peeters MTFDV, Rots ML, Kuijer A, Nieuwenhuijzen GAP, Schipper RJ. Trends on Axillary Surgery in Nondistant Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients Treated Between 2011 and 2015: A Dutch Population-based Study in the ACOSOG-Z0011 and AMAROS Era. Ann Surg 2019; 268:1084-1090. [PMID: 28742702 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000002440] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate patterns of care in axillary surgery for Dutch clinical T1-4N0M0 (cT1-4N0M0) breast cancer patients and to assess the effect of the American College for Surgeons Oncology Group (ACOSOG)-Z0011 and After Mapping of the Axilla: Radiotherapy Or Surgery (AMAROS) trial on axillary surgery patterns in Dutch cT1-2N0M0 sentinel node positive breast cancer patients. BACKGROUND Since publication of the ACOSOG-Z0011 and AMAROS trial, omitting a completion axillary lymph node dissection (cALND) in sentinel node positive breast cancer patients is proposed in selected patients. METHODS Data were obtained from the nationwide Nationaal Borstkanker Overleg Nederland breast cancer audit. Descriptive analyses were used to demonstrate trends in axillary surgery. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to identify factors associated with the omission of cALND in cT1-2N0M0 sentinel node-positive breast cancer patients. RESULTS Between 2011 and 2015 in cT1-4N0M0 breast cancer patients, the use of sentinel lymph node biopsy as definitive axillary staging increased from 72% to 93%, and (c)ALND as definitive axillary staging decreased from 24% to 6% (P < 0.001). The use of cALND decreased from 75% to 17% in cT1-2N0 sentinel node-positive patients (P < 0.001). Earlier year of diagnosis, lower age, primary mastectomy, invasive lobular subtype, increasing tumor grade, and treatment in a nonteaching hospital were associated with a lower probability of omitting cALND (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS This study shows a trend towards less extensive axillary surgery in Dutch cT1-T4N0M0 breast cancer patients; illustrated by an overall increase of sentinel lymph node biopsy and decrease in cALND. Despite this trend, particularly noticed in cT1-2N0 sentinel node-positive patients after publication of the ACOSOG-Z0011 and AMAROS trial, variations in patterns of care in axillary surgery are still present.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ingrid G M Poodt
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Pauline E R Spronk
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.,Department of Research, Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing (DICA), Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Guusje Vugts
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Thijs van Dalen
- Department of Surgery, Diakonessen Hospital, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - M T F D Vrancken Peeters
- Department of Surgery, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital (NKI-AVL), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marjolijn L Rots
- Department of Surgery, Diakonessen Hospital, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Anne Kuijer
- Department of Surgery, Diakonessen Hospital, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
van Steenhoven JEC, Kuijer A, Schreuder K, Elias SG, van Diest PJ, van der Wall E, Siesling S, van Dalen T. The Changing Role of Gene-Expression Profiling in the Era of De-escalating Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Early-Stage Breast Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2019; 26:3495-3501. [PMID: 31209664 PMCID: PMC6739278 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-019-07511-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2019] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Purpose We assessed the recent trends in the administration of adjuvant chemotherapy thereby evaluating the role of the 70-gene signature (70-GS) testing in decision-making in the systemic treatment of patients with lymph node negative (N0) and lymph node positive (N+) breast cancer. Methods Patients with a national guideline directed indication for 70-GS use treated between 2013 and 2016 were selected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Time trends in the administration of adjuvant chemotherapy were evaluated within guideline- and age-delineated subgroups. The influence of the 70-GS on chemotherapy use was assessed with logistic regression. Results During the study period, the overall administration of adjuvant chemotherapy decreased from 49 to 23% and 70-GS use increased from 24 to 51%. The 70-GS was not associated with a decreased likelihood for N0 patients to receive chemotherapy (odds ratio [OR] 1.0; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.86–1.17), as the proportion of N0 patients who received chemotherapy in the absence of 70-GS use decreased during the study period. In patients with N1a disease, 70-GS testing was associated with a decreased likelihood to receive chemotherapy (OR 0.21; 95% CI 0.15–0.29). In patients < 50 years and 50–59 years of age, 70-GS use was associated with a consistent lower proportion of patients receiving chemotherapy throughout the study period (OR 0.17; 95% CI 0.13–0.23 and OR 0.53; 95% CI 0.43–0.65, respectively). Conclusions In this population-based study, the administration of adjuvant chemotherapy in ER+ breast cancer strongly declined. For node-positive and younger patients, 70-GS use was associated with a decreased probability for patients to receive adjuvant chemotherapy. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1245/s10434-019-07511-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J E C van Steenhoven
- Department of Surgery, Diakonessenhuis Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands. .,Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - A Kuijer
- Department of Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - K Schreuder
- Department of Research, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - S G Elias
- Department of Epidemiology, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - P J van Diest
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - E van der Wall
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - S Siesling
- Department of Research, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,Department of Health Technology and Services Research, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - T van Dalen
- Department of Surgery, Diakonessenhuis Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Steenhoven J, Kuijer A, Schreuder K, Elias S, Diest P, Wall E, Siesling S, Dalen T. The changing role of gene-expression profiling in the era of de-escalating adjuvant chemotherapy in early stage breast cancer. Ann Oncol 2019. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdz096.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|
12
|
Schreuder K, Kuijer A, Bentum S, van Dalen T, Siesling S. Use and Impact of the 21-Gene Recurrence Score in Relation to the Clinical Risk of Developing Metastases in Early Breast Cancer Patients in the Netherlands. Public Health Genomics 2019; 21:85-92. [PMID: 30650410 DOI: 10.1159/000495742] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2018] [Accepted: 11/23/2018] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The nationwide use of the 21-gene recurrence score (21-RS) and implications regarding chemotherapy administration in relation to clinical risk in early breast cancer patients are investigated. METHODS Breast cancer patients surgically treated between 2014 and 2016 were selected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry and categorized as having a clinical low, intermediate, or high risk of developing metastases. Deployment of the 21-RS is advocated in patients with an intermediate risk of developing metastases. The use and impact of the 21-RS test result on chemotherapy administration were assessed in relation to the clinical risk as well as patient and tumor characteristics; χ2 tests were used for analysis. RESULTS Of all patients, 20,488 were considered as clinical low-, 4,309 as intermediate-, and 15,266 as high-risk patients. The 21-RS was deployed in 0.1% (n = 23), 3.2% (n = 137), and 0.6% (n = 90) of these categories, respectively. In the clinical intermediate-risk group, the 21-RS assigned 73.7, 13.1, and 13.1% of patients to the genomic low-, intermediate-, and high-risk category, respectively. Adherence to the 21-RS was 95.6% in these patients. CONCLUSION In the Netherlands, the 21-RS test is applied both inside and outside the guideline-directed area. In case of discordance between the genomic and clinical risk, patients were treated in line with the result of the 21-RS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kay Schreuder
- Department of Research, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, The Netherlands, .,Department of Health Technology and Services Research, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands,
| | - Anne Kuijer
- Department of Surgery, Diakonessenhuis Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Sanne Bentum
- Department of Health Technology and Services Research, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Thijs van Dalen
- Department of Surgery, Diakonessenhuis Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Sabine Siesling
- Department of Research, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, The Netherlands.,Department of Health Technology and Services Research, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Poodt IG, Rots ML, Vugts G, van Dalen T, Kuijer A, Vriens BE, Nieuwenhuijzen GA, Schipper RJ. The administration of adjuvant chemo(-immuno) therapy in the post ACOSOG-Z0011 era; a population based study. Eur J Surg Oncol 2018; 44:1151-1156. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2018.03.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2018] [Revised: 02/27/2018] [Accepted: 03/05/2018] [Indexed: 10/17/2022] Open
|
14
|
Schreuder K, Kuijer A, Bentum S, Van Dalen T, Siesling S. Use of 21-recurrence score test in relation to the indication area and adherence of the test-result in patients with early breast cancer. Eur J Cancer 2018. [DOI: 10.1016/s0959-8049(18)30663-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
|
15
|
Schreuder K, Kuijer A, Rutgers EJT, Smorenburg CH, Van Dalen T, Siesling S. Abstract P3-08-09: Impact of gene-expression profiling in patients with early breast cancer when applied outside the guideline directed indication area. Cancer Res 2018. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs17-p3-08-09] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
In Dutch guidelines gene expression profiles (GEP) are indicated in estrogen receptor positive early breast cancer patients in whom benefit of chemotherapy (CT) is controversial based on traditional prognostic factors alone. Aim of the current study is to assess the use and impact of GEP on administration of adjuvant CT in breast cancer patients who have according to national guidelines a clear indication to either use or withhold adjuvant chemotherapy (clinical high or low risk).
Methods
Clinical low- and high risk patients, according to Dutch breast cancer guidelines, diagnosed between 2011-2014 were selected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry (NCR). Influence of GEP use and GEP test result on CT administration was assessed with logistic regression.
Results
Overall, 26,425 patients were identified; 4.8% of patients with clinical low- risk (444/ 9,354), 7.5% of the patients with a clinical high-risk (1,281/ 17,071) received a GEP. GEP use was associated with a significantly increased odds of CT administration in clinical low-risk patients (OR=2.12 95%CI: 1.44-3.11). In clinical high-risk patients GEP use was associated with a decreased frequency of CT administration (OR=0.55, 95%CI: 0.48-0.63). Adherence to the GEP result was higher in clinical high-risk patients with a discordant GEP result as compared to clinical low-risk patients with a discordant GEP result: 71.7% vs. 52.2%, respectively.
Conclusion
GEP is frequently used outside the indicated area and significantly influenced the administration of adjuvant CT, although adherence to the test-result was limited.
Citation Format: Schreuder K, Kuijer A, Rutgers EJTh, Smorenburg CH, Van Dalen T, Siesling S. Impact of gene-expression profiling in patients with early breast cancer when applied outside the guideline directed indication area [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-08-09.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Schreuder
- Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, Netherlands; University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands; Diakonessenhuis Utrecht, Utrecht; Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital – Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - A Kuijer
- Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, Netherlands; University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands; Diakonessenhuis Utrecht, Utrecht; Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital – Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - EJTh Rutgers
- Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, Netherlands; University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands; Diakonessenhuis Utrecht, Utrecht; Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital – Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - CH Smorenburg
- Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, Netherlands; University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands; Diakonessenhuis Utrecht, Utrecht; Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital – Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - T Van Dalen
- Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, Netherlands; University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands; Diakonessenhuis Utrecht, Utrecht; Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital – Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - S Siesling
- Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, Netherlands; University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands; Diakonessenhuis Utrecht, Utrecht; Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital – Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Aalders K, Genbrugge E, Poncet C, Kuijer A, Pistilli B, Piccart M, Tryfonidis K, van Dalen T, Cardoso F, van 't Veer L, Rutgers E. Abstract P1-07-08: Young age and the risk of disease recurrence as assessed by the 70-gene signature – an analysis from the EORTC 10041/BIG 03-04 MINDACT trial. Cancer Res 2018. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs17-p1-07-08] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Purpose: Increased insight in tumor biology has revealed that not all young women are at high risk of disease recurrence. Therefore, in some patients extent of treatment could probably be safely scaled down. We aimed to evaluate the risk of breast cancer (BC) relapse according to the 70-gene signature (70-GS) result in relation to young age, in early-stage BC patients enrolled in the MINDACT trial.
Patients and Methods: The analyzed population consisted of enrolled BC patients in the MINDACT trial with available clinical (C), as per a modified version of Adjuvant!Online, and genomic (G), according to the 70-GS, risk assessments and known age (n=6693). Patients were categorized in three age groups; <45 (young), 45-55 (peri-menopausal) and >55 years (post-menopausal). Clinicopathological and treatment characteristics as well as gene expression were compared for the different age groups further split by corrected risk groups (C-low/G-low, C-low/G-high, C-high/G-low, C-high/G-high). Subsequently, the 5-year distant metastasis-free survival according to risk category was calculated.
Results: The study included 1100 patients <45 (16%), 2272 aged 45-55 (34%) and 3321 patients >55 years of age (50%). Median age of the young group was 41 (25.8-45.0) years. The young age group had a higher frequency of lymph node involvement (25% vs. 22% and 19%), poorly differentiated tumors (42% vs. 26% and 27%), ER-negative tumors (20% vs. 11% and 11%) and triple negative molecular IHC subtype (16% vs. 9% ad 8%). Median tumor size was the same across the 3 age groups (17mm). Of the 1100 young patients, 61% were C-high while the 70-GS assessed 48% as G-high. Overall, 31% were CL/GL (vs. 43% in other age groups), 9% CL/GH, 21% CH/GL and 40% CH/GH (vs. 24% and 25%).
In the discordant risk groups, chemotherapy (CT) allocation when randomized to no chemo occurred in 5% of young women as compared to 3% and 1% in the older age groups. Reason for non-compliance was 50/50 between patient refusal and PI decision.
Overall, the 5-year DMFS was 94.1% (95% CI 92.4-95.4) in <45 age group, 95.3% (95% CI 94.2-96.1) in 45-55 and 94.9% (95% CI 94.0-95.6) in >55. For the young patients, 5-year DMFS was 98.3% for the CL/GL (96.0-99.3), 97.4% in CL/GH (90.0-99.4), 95.5% in CH/GL (91.6-97.7) and 89.2% in CH/GH (85.6-92.0). In the older two age groups (45-55 and >55), the 5-year DMFS rates were 97.8% (96.5.98.6) and 97.2% (96.2-98.0) for CL/GL, 93.9% (88.8-96.7) and 94.5% (91.0-96.7) for CL/GH, 94.5% (92.0-96.3) and 95.4% (93.5-96.8) for CH/GL and 92.0% (89.2-94.1) and 90.4% (88.0-92.4) for CH/GH, respectively. With 9 events in the <45 group at a CH/GL risk, numbers were too small to evaluate chemotherapy effect in this population.
Conclusion: The use of the 70-GS reduces the proportion of patients characterized as high risk as compared to traditional clinical risk assessment (48% vs. 61%). Outcome was comparable for the 3 age categories with a very good 5-year DMFS of 95-98% in all GL groups. Performing the 70-GS provides clinically relevant information concerning the prognosis for young early-stage BC patients categorized as CH. These results add important new data to the limited available evidence on genomic expression in young BC patients.
Citation Format: Aalders K, Genbrugge E, Poncet C, Kuijer A, Pistilli B, Piccart M, Tryfonidis K, van Dalen T, Cardoso F, van 't Veer L, Rutgers E. Young age and the risk of disease recurrence as assessed by the 70-gene signature – an analysis from the EORTC 10041/BIG 03-04 MINDACT trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-07-08.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Aalders
- European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Headquarters; Diakonessenhuis Utrecht; Institut Gustave Roussy; Institut Jules Bordet, Universite Libre de Bruxelles; Champalimaud Cancer Center; UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center; Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek
| | - E Genbrugge
- European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Headquarters; Diakonessenhuis Utrecht; Institut Gustave Roussy; Institut Jules Bordet, Universite Libre de Bruxelles; Champalimaud Cancer Center; UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center; Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek
| | - C Poncet
- European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Headquarters; Diakonessenhuis Utrecht; Institut Gustave Roussy; Institut Jules Bordet, Universite Libre de Bruxelles; Champalimaud Cancer Center; UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center; Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek
| | - A Kuijer
- European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Headquarters; Diakonessenhuis Utrecht; Institut Gustave Roussy; Institut Jules Bordet, Universite Libre de Bruxelles; Champalimaud Cancer Center; UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center; Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek
| | - B Pistilli
- European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Headquarters; Diakonessenhuis Utrecht; Institut Gustave Roussy; Institut Jules Bordet, Universite Libre de Bruxelles; Champalimaud Cancer Center; UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center; Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek
| | - M Piccart
- European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Headquarters; Diakonessenhuis Utrecht; Institut Gustave Roussy; Institut Jules Bordet, Universite Libre de Bruxelles; Champalimaud Cancer Center; UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center; Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek
| | - K Tryfonidis
- European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Headquarters; Diakonessenhuis Utrecht; Institut Gustave Roussy; Institut Jules Bordet, Universite Libre de Bruxelles; Champalimaud Cancer Center; UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center; Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek
| | - T van Dalen
- European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Headquarters; Diakonessenhuis Utrecht; Institut Gustave Roussy; Institut Jules Bordet, Universite Libre de Bruxelles; Champalimaud Cancer Center; UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center; Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek
| | - F Cardoso
- European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Headquarters; Diakonessenhuis Utrecht; Institut Gustave Roussy; Institut Jules Bordet, Universite Libre de Bruxelles; Champalimaud Cancer Center; UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center; Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek
| | - L van 't Veer
- European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Headquarters; Diakonessenhuis Utrecht; Institut Gustave Roussy; Institut Jules Bordet, Universite Libre de Bruxelles; Champalimaud Cancer Center; UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center; Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek
| | - E Rutgers
- European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Headquarters; Diakonessenhuis Utrecht; Institut Gustave Roussy; Institut Jules Bordet, Universite Libre de Bruxelles; Champalimaud Cancer Center; UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center; Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Schreuder K, Kuijer A, Rutgers EJT, Smorenburg CH, van Dalen T, Siesling S. Impact of gene-expression profiling in patients with early breast cancer when applied outside the guideline directed indication area. Eur J Cancer 2017; 84:270-277. [PMID: 28844015 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2017.07.042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2017] [Revised: 07/24/2017] [Accepted: 07/25/2017] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE In Dutch guidelines, gene expression profiles (GEP) are indicated in estrogen receptor positive early breast cancer patients in whom benefit of chemotherapy (CT) is uncertain based on traditional prognostic factors alone. Aim of the present study is to assess the use and impact of GEP on administration of adjuvant CT in breast cancer patients who have according to national guidelines a clear indication to either use or withhold adjuvant chemotherapy (clinical high or low risk). METHODS Clinical low- and high-risk patients, according to Dutch breast cancer guidelines, diagnosed between 2011 and 2014 were selected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Influence of GEP use and GEP test result on CT administration was assessed with logistic regression. RESULTS Overall, 26,425 patients were identified; 4.8% of patients with clinical low risk (444/9354), 7.5% of the patients with a clinical high risk (1281/17,071) received a GEP. GEP use was associated with significantly increased odds of CT administration in clinical low-risk patients (OR = 2.12 95% CI: 1.44-3.11). In clinical high-risk patients, GEP use was associated with a decreased frequency of CT administration (OR = 0.55, 95% CI: 0.48-0.63). Adherence to the GEP result was higher in clinical high-risk patients with a discordant GEP result as compared to clinical low-risk patients with a discordant GEP result: 71.7% vs. 52.2%, respectively. CONCLUSION GEP is frequently used outside the indicated area and significantly influenced the administration of adjuvant CT, although adherence to the test result was limited.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Schreuder
- Department of Research, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, The Netherlands; Department of Health Technology and Services Research, MIRA Institute for Biomedical Technology and Technical Medicine, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
| | - A Kuijer
- Department of Surgery, Diakonessenhuis Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - E J Th Rutgers
- Department of Surgery, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital - Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - C H Smorenburg
- Department of Medical Oncology, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital - Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Th van Dalen
- Department of Surgery, Diakonessenhuis Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - S Siesling
- Department of Research, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, The Netherlands; Department of Health Technology and Services Research, MIRA Institute for Biomedical Technology and Technical Medicine, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Kuijer A, Straver M, den Dekker B, van Bommel AC, Elias SG, Smorenburg CH, Wesseling J, Linn SC, Rutgers EJ, Siesling S, van Dalen T. Impact of 70-Gene Signature Use on Adjuvant Chemotherapy Decisions in Patients With Estrogen Receptor–Positive Early Breast Cancer: Results of a Prospective Cohort Study. J Clin Oncol 2017; 35:2814-2819. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2016.70.3959] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Gene-expression profiles increasingly are used in addition to conventional prognostic factors to guide adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) decisions. The Dutch guideline suggests use of validated gene-expression profiles in patients with estrogen receptor (ER) –positive, early-stage breast cancer without overt lymph node metastases. We aimed to assess the impact of a 70-gene signature (70-GS) test on CT decisions in patients with ER-positive, early-stage breast cancer. Patients and Methods In a prospective, observational, multicenter study in patients younger than 70 years old who had undergone surgery for ER-positive, early-stage breast cancer, physicians were asked whether they intended to administer adjuvant CT before deployment of the 70-GS test and after the test result was available. Results Between October 1, 2013, and December 31, 2015, 660 patients, treated in 33 hospitals, were enrolled. Fifty-one percent of patients had pT1cN0, BRII, HER2-Neu-negative breast cancer. On the basis of conventional clinicopathological characteristics, physicians recommended CT in 270 (41%) of the 660 patients and recommended withholding CT in 107 (16%) of the 660 patients. For the remaining 43% of patients, the physicians were unsure and unable to give advice before 70-GS testing. In patients for whom CT was initially recommended or not recommended, 56% and 59%, respectively, were assigned to a low-risk profile by the 70-GS (κ, 0.02; 95% CI, -0.08 to 0.11). After disclosure of the 70-GS test result, the preliminary advice was changed in 51% of patients who received a recommendation before testing; the definitive CT recommendation of the physician was in line with the 70-GS result in 96% of patients. Conclusion In this prospective, multicenter study in a selection of patients with ER-positive, early-stage breast cancer, 70-GS use changed the physician-intended recommendation to administer CT in half of the patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne Kuijer
- Anne Kuijer, Marieke Straver, Bianca den Dekker, Annelotte C.M. van Bommel, and Thijs van Dalen, Diakonessenhuis; Anne Kuijer, Sjoerd G. Elias, Sabine C. Linn, and Thijs van Dalen, University Medical Centre Utrecht; Sabine Siesling, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization, Utrecht; Carolien H. Smorenburg and Jelle Wesseling, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital; Carolien H. Smorenburg, Jelle Wesseling, Sabine C. Linn, and Emiel J.Th. Rutgers, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam; and Sabine Siesling,
| | - Marieke Straver
- Anne Kuijer, Marieke Straver, Bianca den Dekker, Annelotte C.M. van Bommel, and Thijs van Dalen, Diakonessenhuis; Anne Kuijer, Sjoerd G. Elias, Sabine C. Linn, and Thijs van Dalen, University Medical Centre Utrecht; Sabine Siesling, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization, Utrecht; Carolien H. Smorenburg and Jelle Wesseling, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital; Carolien H. Smorenburg, Jelle Wesseling, Sabine C. Linn, and Emiel J.Th. Rutgers, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam; and Sabine Siesling,
| | - Bianca den Dekker
- Anne Kuijer, Marieke Straver, Bianca den Dekker, Annelotte C.M. van Bommel, and Thijs van Dalen, Diakonessenhuis; Anne Kuijer, Sjoerd G. Elias, Sabine C. Linn, and Thijs van Dalen, University Medical Centre Utrecht; Sabine Siesling, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization, Utrecht; Carolien H. Smorenburg and Jelle Wesseling, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital; Carolien H. Smorenburg, Jelle Wesseling, Sabine C. Linn, and Emiel J.Th. Rutgers, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam; and Sabine Siesling,
| | - Annelotte C.M. van Bommel
- Anne Kuijer, Marieke Straver, Bianca den Dekker, Annelotte C.M. van Bommel, and Thijs van Dalen, Diakonessenhuis; Anne Kuijer, Sjoerd G. Elias, Sabine C. Linn, and Thijs van Dalen, University Medical Centre Utrecht; Sabine Siesling, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization, Utrecht; Carolien H. Smorenburg and Jelle Wesseling, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital; Carolien H. Smorenburg, Jelle Wesseling, Sabine C. Linn, and Emiel J.Th. Rutgers, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam; and Sabine Siesling,
| | - Sjoerd G. Elias
- Anne Kuijer, Marieke Straver, Bianca den Dekker, Annelotte C.M. van Bommel, and Thijs van Dalen, Diakonessenhuis; Anne Kuijer, Sjoerd G. Elias, Sabine C. Linn, and Thijs van Dalen, University Medical Centre Utrecht; Sabine Siesling, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization, Utrecht; Carolien H. Smorenburg and Jelle Wesseling, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital; Carolien H. Smorenburg, Jelle Wesseling, Sabine C. Linn, and Emiel J.Th. Rutgers, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam; and Sabine Siesling,
| | - Carolien H. Smorenburg
- Anne Kuijer, Marieke Straver, Bianca den Dekker, Annelotte C.M. van Bommel, and Thijs van Dalen, Diakonessenhuis; Anne Kuijer, Sjoerd G. Elias, Sabine C. Linn, and Thijs van Dalen, University Medical Centre Utrecht; Sabine Siesling, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization, Utrecht; Carolien H. Smorenburg and Jelle Wesseling, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital; Carolien H. Smorenburg, Jelle Wesseling, Sabine C. Linn, and Emiel J.Th. Rutgers, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam; and Sabine Siesling,
| | - Jelle Wesseling
- Anne Kuijer, Marieke Straver, Bianca den Dekker, Annelotte C.M. van Bommel, and Thijs van Dalen, Diakonessenhuis; Anne Kuijer, Sjoerd G. Elias, Sabine C. Linn, and Thijs van Dalen, University Medical Centre Utrecht; Sabine Siesling, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization, Utrecht; Carolien H. Smorenburg and Jelle Wesseling, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital; Carolien H. Smorenburg, Jelle Wesseling, Sabine C. Linn, and Emiel J.Th. Rutgers, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam; and Sabine Siesling,
| | - Sabine C. Linn
- Anne Kuijer, Marieke Straver, Bianca den Dekker, Annelotte C.M. van Bommel, and Thijs van Dalen, Diakonessenhuis; Anne Kuijer, Sjoerd G. Elias, Sabine C. Linn, and Thijs van Dalen, University Medical Centre Utrecht; Sabine Siesling, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization, Utrecht; Carolien H. Smorenburg and Jelle Wesseling, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital; Carolien H. Smorenburg, Jelle Wesseling, Sabine C. Linn, and Emiel J.Th. Rutgers, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam; and Sabine Siesling,
| | - Emiel J.Th. Rutgers
- Anne Kuijer, Marieke Straver, Bianca den Dekker, Annelotte C.M. van Bommel, and Thijs van Dalen, Diakonessenhuis; Anne Kuijer, Sjoerd G. Elias, Sabine C. Linn, and Thijs van Dalen, University Medical Centre Utrecht; Sabine Siesling, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization, Utrecht; Carolien H. Smorenburg and Jelle Wesseling, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital; Carolien H. Smorenburg, Jelle Wesseling, Sabine C. Linn, and Emiel J.Th. Rutgers, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam; and Sabine Siesling,
| | - Sabine Siesling
- Anne Kuijer, Marieke Straver, Bianca den Dekker, Annelotte C.M. van Bommel, and Thijs van Dalen, Diakonessenhuis; Anne Kuijer, Sjoerd G. Elias, Sabine C. Linn, and Thijs van Dalen, University Medical Centre Utrecht; Sabine Siesling, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization, Utrecht; Carolien H. Smorenburg and Jelle Wesseling, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital; Carolien H. Smorenburg, Jelle Wesseling, Sabine C. Linn, and Emiel J.Th. Rutgers, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam; and Sabine Siesling,
| | - Thijs van Dalen
- Anne Kuijer, Marieke Straver, Bianca den Dekker, Annelotte C.M. van Bommel, and Thijs van Dalen, Diakonessenhuis; Anne Kuijer, Sjoerd G. Elias, Sabine C. Linn, and Thijs van Dalen, University Medical Centre Utrecht; Sabine Siesling, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization, Utrecht; Carolien H. Smorenburg and Jelle Wesseling, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital; Carolien H. Smorenburg, Jelle Wesseling, Sabine C. Linn, and Emiel J.Th. Rutgers, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam; and Sabine Siesling,
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Kuijer A, Verloop J, Visser O, Sonke G, Jager A, van Gils C, van Dalen T, Elias S. The influence of socioeconomic status and ethnicity on adjuvant systemic treatment guideline adherence for early-stage breast cancer in the Netherlands. Ann Oncol 2017; 28:1970-1978. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdx204] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
|
20
|
Aalders KC, Kuijer A, Straver ME, Slaets L, Litiere S, Viale G, Van't Veer LJ, Glas AM, Delorenzi M, van Dalen T, Tryfonidis K, Piccart MJ, Cardoso F, Rutgers EJ. Characterisation of multifocal breast cancer using the 70-gene signature in clinical low-risk patients enrolled in the EORTC 10041/BIG 03-04 MINDACT trial. Eur J Cancer 2017; 79:98-105. [PMID: 28477490 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2017.03.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2017] [Revised: 03/22/2017] [Accepted: 03/26/2017] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In multifocal breast cancer, guidelines recommend basing adjuvant systemic treatment decisions on characteristics of the largest lesion, disregarding multifocality as an independent prognosticator. We assessed the association between multifocal disease and both the 70-gene signature (70-GS), and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) in clinical low-risk breast cancer patients enrolled in the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer 10041/BIG 03-04 Microarray In Node-negative and 1 to 3 positive lymph node Disease may Avoid ChemoTherapy (MINDACT) trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS The analysed population consisted of enrolled patients in the MINDACT trial with clinical low-risk disease, defined by a modified Adjuvant! Online cut-off for the 10-year risk of recurrent disease or death. Eligibility criteria of MINDACT dictate that patients with multifocal disease could be included if the different lesions had similar pathological characteristics. The presence of multifocal disease was deducted from the case report form (CRF)-question for sum of diameter for all invasive tumour foci. Clinicopathological characteristics and gene expression of patients with unifocal and multifocal (largest lesion) disease were compared. Subsequently, the association between multifocal disease and the 70-GS was evaluated as well as the association between multifocality and 5-year DMFS. RESULTS The study included 3090 clinical low-risk patients with unifocal and 238 patients with multifocal disease. Apart from a higher prevalence of lobular tumours (21.8% versus 10.8%, by local pathology), we did not observe differences in baseline characteristics between multifocal and unifocal tumours. Patients with multifocal tumours were more likely to be at high genomic risk as compared to patients with unifocal tumours (22.7% versus 17.3%, odds ratio [OR] 1.45, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02-2.07, P = 0.038). We did not find a significant association between tumour focality and DMFS (97.1% for unifocal versus 96.9% for multifocal, hazard ratio [HR] = 1.55, 95% CI 0.68-3.46, P = 0.172), nor a signal for a potential interaction between the prognostic effect of the 70-GS and focality of the tumour regarding DMFS. CONCLUSION In the group of clinical low-risk MINDACT patients, multifocal tumours were more likely to have a high-risk 70-GS profile compared to unifocal tumours. We did not observe a significant interaction between multifocality and the 70-GS with respect to survival without distant metastasis in these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K C Aalders
- Medical Department, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, Belgium
| | - A Kuijer
- Department of Surgery, Diakonessenhuis Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Department of Radiology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - M E Straver
- Department of Surgery, Haaglanden Medical Centre, The Hague, The Netherlands
| | - L Slaets
- Department of Statistics, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, Belgium
| | - S Litiere
- Department of Statistics, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, Belgium
| | - G Viale
- Department of Pathology, European Institute of Oncology and University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - L J Van't Veer
- UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - A M Glas
- Department of Product Development and Support, Agendia, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M Delorenzi
- Bioinformatics Core Facility, SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, Lausanne, Switzerland; Ludwig Center for Cancer Research, University of Lausanne, Epalinges, Switzerland; Department of Oncology, Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - T van Dalen
- Department of Surgery, Diakonessenhuis Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - K Tryfonidis
- Medical Department, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, Belgium
| | - M J Piccart
- Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - F Cardoso
- Breast Unit, Champalimaud Clinical Center, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - E J Rutgers
- Department of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Kuijer A, Straver M, Elias S, Smorenburg C, Wesseling J, Linn S, Rutgers E, Siesling S, van Dalen T. Abstract P1-03-04: Concordance of local immunohistochemistry with TargetPrint microarray based assessment of ER, PR and Her2 and BluePrint molecular subtyping in the Symphony Triple A study. Cancer Res 2017. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs16-p1-03-04] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
PURPOSE: A decade ago intrinsic biological breast cancer subtypes have been identified which have proven to be of clinical importance in terms of outcome and response to systemic treatment. The aim of the current study is to assess concordance between breast cancer subtypes determined by local immunohistochemistry (IHC) assessment of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR) and Her2-receptor status and microarray based molecular subtyping in a subset of ER+ early stage breast cancer patients.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this prospective observational multicenter study information on local pathology assessment and BluePrint/TargetPrint results were obtained in ER+ Dutch early stage breast cancer patients in whom a 70-gene profile (MammaPrint) was used as they were enrolled in clinical trial based on the existence of controversy regarding the additional value of adjuvant CT. Local IHC assessment of ER, PR and Her2 status were compared with microarray based assessment (TargetPrint/BluePrint) of these characteristics. Reclassification of ER and PR overexpression was assessed by a McNemars test and by Spearman correlation. Furthermore, concordance between the clinical subtypes based on local pathology (Luminal-type: ER+/PR+/Her2-; Her2-type: Her2+ disease) and molecular subtyping was assessed.
RESULTS: Between January 2013 And December 2015 660 patients, treated in 31 hospitals, were enrolled. In 564 (85%) BluePrint and/or TargetPrint was performed in addition to the 70-GS. The majority of patients had ER+/Her2- disease and TargetPrint reclassified 1% (n = 7) of patients as ER-negative (r = 0,250, p <0,001). TargetPrint reclassified 7% (n = 40) and 2% (n = 11) of patients for PR and Her2 status respectively (table 1, r = 0,580, p <0,001 for PR
Table 1. Concordance between immunohistochemistry and TargetPrint. TargetPrint result (ER, PR and Her2 resp.) ImmunohistochemistryPositiveNegativeOverall discordance (%)p-value*Estrogenreceptor status Positive557 (99%)6 (1%) Negativen.a.n.a.1%n.a.Progesterone receptor status Positive474 (96%)18 (4%) Negative22 (31%)49 (69%)7%0,636Her2 receptor status Positive3 (30%)7 (70%) Negative4 (3%)546 (97%)2%0,549Equivocal0 (0%)3 (1%) * P-value represents results of the McNemar test.). Based on IHC 545 (98%) patients were regarded as luminal-type and the remaining 2% as Her2-type. BluePrint reclassified 2% of the clinical luminal-type patients: 4 (1%) patients were reclassified as basal-type and 3 (0%) patients as Her2-type. Of the clinical Her2-type patients 80% (n=8) was reclassified by BluePrint as molecular luminal-type.
Table 2. Concordance between clinical subtyping and molecular subtyping according to BluePrint. BluePrint resultClinical SubtypeNo. ptsLuminalBasalHer2Luminal545539 (99%)4 (1%)3 (0%)Her2108 (80%)02 (20%)Note. Overall discordance 3%.
Conclusion: In the current study we observe a high concordance between microarray-based assessment of ER, PR and Her2 and local pathology in Dutch ER+ early stage breast cancer patients. In the small subset of ER+ patients who are considered candidates for 70 GS use and who have HER2+ tumors by IHC molecular typing of HER2 status is of additional value.
Citation Format: Kuijer A, Straver M, Elias S, Smorenburg C, Wesseling J, Linn S, Rutgers E, Siesling S, van Dalen T. Concordance of local immunohistochemistry with TargetPrint microarray based assessment of ER, PR and Her2 and BluePrint molecular subtyping in the Symphony Triple A study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2016 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-03-04.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Kuijer
- Diakonessenhuis, Utrecht, Netherlands; University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands; Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Comprehensive Cancer Center, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - M Straver
- Diakonessenhuis, Utrecht, Netherlands; University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands; Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Comprehensive Cancer Center, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - S Elias
- Diakonessenhuis, Utrecht, Netherlands; University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands; Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Comprehensive Cancer Center, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - C Smorenburg
- Diakonessenhuis, Utrecht, Netherlands; University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands; Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Comprehensive Cancer Center, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - J Wesseling
- Diakonessenhuis, Utrecht, Netherlands; University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands; Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Comprehensive Cancer Center, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - S Linn
- Diakonessenhuis, Utrecht, Netherlands; University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands; Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Comprehensive Cancer Center, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - E Rutgers
- Diakonessenhuis, Utrecht, Netherlands; University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands; Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Comprehensive Cancer Center, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - S Siesling
- Diakonessenhuis, Utrecht, Netherlands; University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands; Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Comprehensive Cancer Center, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - T van Dalen
- Diakonessenhuis, Utrecht, Netherlands; University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands; Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Comprehensive Cancer Center, Utrecht, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Verschoor AMF, Kuijer A, Verloop J, Van Gils CH, Sonke GS, Jager A, van Dalen T, Elias SG. Adjuvant systemic therapy in early breast cancer: impact of guideline changes and clinicopathological factors associated with nonadherence at a nation-wide level. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2016; 159:357-65. [PMID: 27514397 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-016-3940-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2016] [Accepted: 08/06/2016] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
Over recent years, adjuvant systemic treatment guidelines (AST) for early-stage breast cancer have changed considerably. We aimed to assess the impact of these guideline changes on the administration of AST in early-stage breast cancer patients and to what extent these guidelines are adhered to at a nation-wide level. We used Netherlands Cancer Registry data to describe trends in AST prescription, adherence to AST guidelines, and to identify clinicopathological determinants of nonadherence. Between 1990 and 2012, 231,648 Dutch patients were diagnosed with early breast cancer, of whom 124,472 received AST. Adjuvant endocrine treatment (ET) use increased from 23 % of patients (1990) to 56 % (2012), and chemotherapy from 11 to 44 %. In 2009-2012, 8 % of patients received ET and 3 % received chemotherapy without guideline indication. Conversely, 10-29 % of patients did not receive ET and chemotherapy, respectively, despite a guideline indication. Unfavorable clinicopathological characteristics generally decreased the chance of undertreatment and increased the chance for overtreatment. Remarkable was the increased chance of ET undertreatment in younger women (RR < 35 vs 60-69 years 1.79; 95 % CI 1.30-2.47) and in women with HER2+ disease (RR 1.64; 95 % CI 1.46-1.85). Over the years, AST guidelines expanded resulting in much more Dutch early breast cancer patients receiving AST. In the majority of cases, AST administration was guideline concordant, but the high frequency of chemotherapy undertreatment in some subgroups suggests limited AST guideline support in these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A M F Verschoor
- Department of Epidemiology, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Universiteitsweg 100, P.O. Box 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - A Kuijer
- Department of Surgery, Diakonessenhuis Utrecht, Bosboomstraat 1, 3582 KE, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Universiteitsweg 100, P.O. Box 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - J Verloop
- Department of Research, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization, Postbus 19079, 3501 DB, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - C H Van Gils
- Department of Epidemiology, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Universiteitsweg 100, P.O. Box 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - G S Sonke
- Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - A Jager
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus Medical Cancer Institute, Postbus 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - T van Dalen
- Department of Surgery, Diakonessenhuis Utrecht, Bosboomstraat 1, 3582 KE, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - S G Elias
- Department of Epidemiology, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Universiteitsweg 100, P.O. Box 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Kuijer A, Schreuder K, Elias SG, Smorenburg CH, Rutgers EJT, Siesling S, van Dalen T. Factors Associated with the Use of Gene Expression Profiles in Estrogen Receptor-Positive Early-Stage Breast Cancer Patients: A Nationwide Study. Public Health Genomics 2016; 19:276-81. [PMID: 27508402 DOI: 10.1159/000448278] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2016] [Accepted: 07/11/2016] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Breast cancer guidelines suggest the use of gene expression profiles (GEPs) in estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) breast cancer patients in whom controversy exists regarding adjuvant chemotherapy benefit based on traditional prognostic factors alone. We evaluated the current use of GEPs in these patients in the Netherlands. PATIENTS AND METHODS Primary breast cancer patients treated between January 1, 2011 and December 31, 2014 and eligible for GEP use according to the Dutch national breast cancer guideline were identified in the Netherlands Cancer Registry: ER+ patients <70 years with grade 1 tumors >2 cm or grade 2 tumors 1-2 cm without overt lymph node metastases (pN0-Nmi). Mixed-effect logistic regression analysis was performed to associate characteristics of patients, tumors and hospitals with GEP use. RESULTS GEPs were increasingly deployed: 12% of eligible patients received a GEP in 2011 versus 46% in 2014. Lobular versus ductal morphology (OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.47-0.72), pN1mi status (versus pN0, OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.40-0.68), and tumor size (>3 cm vs. >2 cm, OR 0.33, 95% CI 0.14-0.88) were inversely associated with GEP use. High socioeconomic status (SES) (OR 1.32, 95% CI 1.06-1.64) and younger age (OR 0.96/year increasing age, 95% CI 0.95-0.96) were positively associated with GEP use. GEP use per hospital did vary, but no predefined institutional factors remained independently associated with GEP use. CONCLUSION GEP use increased over time and was influenced by patient- and tumor-associated factors as well as by SES.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne Kuijer
- Department of Surgery, Diakonessenhuis Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Bastian OW, Kuijer A, Koenderman L, Stellato RK, van Solinge WW, Leenen LP, Blokhuis TJ. Impaired bone healing in multitrauma patients is associated with altered leukocyte kinetics after major trauma. J Inflamm Res 2016; 9:69-78. [PMID: 27274302 PMCID: PMC4876940 DOI: 10.2147/jir.s101064] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Animal studies have shown that the systemic inflammatory response to major injury impairs bone regeneration. It remains unclear whether the systemic immune response contributes to impairment of fracture healing in multitrauma patients. It is well known that systemic inflammatory changes after major trauma affect leukocyte kinetics. We therefore retrospectively compared the cellular composition of peripheral blood during the first 2 weeks after injury between multitrauma patients with normal (n=48) and impaired (n=32) fracture healing of the tibia. The peripheral blood-count curves of leukocytes, neutrophils, monocytes, and thrombocytes differed significantly between patients with normal and impaired fracture healing during the first 2 weeks after trauma (P-values were 0.0122, 0.0083, 0.0204, and <0.0001, respectively). Mean myeloid cell counts were above reference values during the second week after injury. Our data indicate that leukocyte kinetics differ significantly between patients with normal and impaired fracture healing during the first 2 weeks after major injury. This finding suggests that the systemic immune response to major trauma can disturb tissue regeneration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Okan W Bastian
- Department of Traumatology, Julius center, Utrecht, the netherlands
| | - Anne Kuijer
- Department of Traumatology, Julius center, Utrecht, the netherlands
| | - Leo Koenderman
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Julius center, Utrecht, the netherlands
| | - Rebecca K Stellato
- Department of Biostatistics and Research support, Julius center, Utrecht, the netherlands
| | - Wouter W van Solinge
- Department of clinical chemistry and hematology, University Medical center Utrecht, Utrecht, the netherlands
| | - Luke Ph Leenen
- Department of Traumatology, Julius center, Utrecht, the netherlands
| | - Taco J Blokhuis
- Department of Traumatology, Julius center, Utrecht, the netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Kuijer A, Drukker CA, Elias SG, Smorenburg CH, Th Rutgers EJ, Siesling S, van Dalen T. Changes over time in the impact of gene-expression profiles on the administration of adjuvant chemotherapy in estrogen receptor positive early stage breast cancer patients: A nationwide study. Int J Cancer 2016; 139:769-75. [PMID: 27062369 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.30132] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2016] [Revised: 03/27/2016] [Accepted: 03/29/2016] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Ten years ago gene-expression profiles were introduced to aid adjuvant chemotherapy decision making in breast cancer. Since then subsequent national guidelines gradually expanded the indication area for adjuvant chemotherapy. In this nation-wide study the evolution of the proportion of patients with estrogen-receptor positive (ER+) tumors receiving adjuvant chemotherapy in relation to gene-expression profile use in patient groups that became newly eligible for chemotherapy according to national guideline changes over time is assessed. Data on all surgically treated early breast cancer patients diagnosed between 2004-2006 and 2012-2014 were obtained from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. ER+/Her2- patients with tumor-characteristics making them eligible for gene-expression testing in both cohorts and a discordant chemotherapy recommendation over time (2004 guideline not recommending and 2012 guideline recommending chemotherapy) were identified. We identified 3,864 patients eligible for gene-expression profile use during both periods. Gene-expression profiles were deployed in 5% and 35% of the patients in the respective periods. In both periods the majority of patients was assigned to a low genomic risk-profile (67% and 69%, respectively) and high adherence rates to the test result were observed (86% and 91%, respectively). Without deploying a gene-expression profile 8% and 52% (p <0.001) of the respective cohorts received chemotherapy while 21% and 28% of these patients received chemotherapy when a gene-expression profile was used (p 0.191). In conclusion, in ER+/Her2- early stage breast cancer patients gene-expression profile use was associated with a consistent proportion of patients receiving chemotherapy despite an adjusted guideline-based recommendation to administer chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Kuijer
- Department of Surgery, Diakonessenhuis Utrecht, the Netherlands.,Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - C A Drukker
- Department of Surgery, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, the Netherlands
| | - S G Elias
- Department of Epidemiology, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - C H Smorenburg
- Department of Medical Oncology, Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek Hospital - Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - E J Th Rutgers
- Department of Surgery, Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek Hospital - Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - S Siesling
- Department of Research, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization (IKNL), Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Th van Dalen
- Department of Surgery, Diakonessenhuis Utrecht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Kuijer A, Furnée EJB, Smakman N. Combined surgery for primary colorectal cancer and synchronous pulmonary metastasis: a pilot experience in two patients. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2016; 28:15-9. [PMID: 26529361 DOI: 10.1097/meg.0000000000000503] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pulmonary metastasectomy in patients with pulmonary metastases from primary colorectal cancer seems to improve survival in properly selected patients. Therefore, pulmonary metastasectomy has been incorporated widely into the management of colorectal pulmonary metastases. Generally, in patients presenting with primary colorectal cancer and synchronous pulmonary metastases, the primary colorectal cancer is resected first, followed by pulmonary metastasectomy during a second-stage procedure. In the current paper we describe our pilot experience with laparoscopic resection of primary colorectal cancer and thoracoscopic pulmonary metastasectomy during the same operative session. PATIENTS AND METHODS The results of two patients who underwent laparoscopic resection of primary colorectal cancer and thoracoscopic pulmonary metastasectomy during the same operative session are described. RESULTS Both patients were healthy women, 60 and 81 years old, respectively, and without severe comorbidities. In both patients, the colorectal resection was performed first by a laparoscopic approach. Subsequently, thoracoscopic resection of a single pulmonary metastasis followed in both patients. The operative procedure and postoperative course were uneventful and the patients could be discharged within 1 week after surgery. Both the primary colorectal cancer and the pulmonary metastasis were radically removed in both patients. Current follow-up, 14 and 8 months after surgery, respectively, showed no signs of disease recurrence on computed tomographic scan of the abdomen and chest in both patients. CONCLUSION The outcome in these two patients suggests that simultaneous resection of primary colorectal cancer and pulmonary metastasectomy using minimal invasive surgery is safe and might lead to both a decrease in costs and benefit to patients. This simultaneous approach could therefore be considered as an alternative for a two-stage approach in properly selected patients. However, these results should be validated in a larger series.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne Kuijer
- Department of Surgery, Diakonessenhuis, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Kuijer A, van Oosterhout MFM, Kloppenburg GTL, Morshuis WJ. Coronary artery bypass grafting in Takayasu's disease--importance of the proximal anastomosis: a case report. J Med Case Rep 2015; 9:283. [PMID: 26666882 PMCID: PMC4678760 DOI: 10.1186/s13256-015-0767-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2015] [Accepted: 11/10/2015] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Treatment of coronary artery involvement in Takayasu's arteritis is challenging. Coronary artery bypass grafting may be required. The use of saphenous vein grafts is recommended because of possible inflammatory involvement of the internal thoracic arteries. However, inserting the proximal anastomosis on inflamed aortic tissue may give rise to stenosis. Only a few cases of inserting a proximal anastomosis in patients with Takayasu's arteritis have been reported in the literature. To date, no consensus has been reached on the best way to perform this procedure in patients with Takayasu's arteritis. CASE PRESENTATION We report a case of a 25-year-old white woman with Takayasu's arteritis who had recurrent angina after two previous treatments had failed, due to left main stem stenosis. She was successfully treated by coronary artery bypass grafting using a Dacron patch to insert the proximal anastomosis. CONCLUSIONS We are the first to report an uncomplicated case in which a Dacron (Vascutek®, Renfrewshire) prosthetic patch was used to insert the proximal anastomosis on an inflamed aorta in a patient with Takayasu's arteritis. The patch prevents contact between inflamed tissue and the graft, which we believe reduces the risk of graft failure. This case might inspire other thoracic surgeons in the challenging task of performing revascularization techniques in patients with an inflamed and fragile aorta.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne Kuijer
- Department of Surgery, Diakonessenhuis Utrecht, Bosboomstraat 1, P.O. Box 80250, 3508 TG, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - Matthijs F M van Oosterhout
- Department of Pathology, Sint Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Koekoekslaan 1, mailbox 2500, 3430 EM, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.
| | - Geoffrey T L Kloppenburg
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Sint Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Koekoekslaan 1, mailbox 2500, 3430 EM, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.
| | - Wim J Morshuis
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Sint Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Koekoekslaan 1, mailbox 2500, 3430 EM, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|