A population-scale temporal case-control evaluation of COVID-19 disease phenotype and related outcome rates in patients with cancer in England (UKCCP)

Patients with cancer are at increased risk of hospitalisation and mortality following severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. However, the SARS-CoV-2 phenotype evolution in patients with cancer since 2020 has not previously been described. We therefore evaluated SARS-CoV-2 on a UK populationscale from 01/11/2020-31/08/2022, assessing case-outcome rates of hospital assessment(s), intensive care admission and mortality. We observed that the SARS-CoV-2 disease phenotype has become less severe in patients with cancer and the non-cancer population. Case-hospitalisation rates for patients with cancer dropped from 30.58% in early 2021 to 7.45% in 2022 while case-mortality rates decreased from 20.53% to 3.25%. However, the risk of hospitalisation and mortality remains 2.10x and 2.54x higher in patients with cancer, respectively. Overall, the SARS-CoV-2 disease phenotype is less severe in 2022 compared to 2020 but patients with cancer remain at higher risk than the non-cancer population. Patients with cancer must therefore be empowered to live more normal lives, to see loved ones and families, while also being safeguarded with expanded measures to reduce the risk of transmission.

Association of SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Antibody Vaccine Response With Infection Severity in Patients With Cancer: A National COVID Cancer Cross-sectional Evaluation

Importance

Accurate identification of patient groups with the lowest level of protection following COVID-19 vaccination is important to better target resources and interventions for the most vulnerable populations. It is not known whether SARS-CoV-2 antibody testing has clinical utility for high-risk groups, such as people with cancer.

Objective

To evaluate whether spike protein antibody vaccine response (COV-S) following COVID-19 vaccination is associated with the risk of SARS-CoV-2 breakthrough infection or hospitalization among patients with cancer.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This was a population-based cross-sectional study of patients with cancer from the UK as part of the National COVID Cancer Antibody Survey. Adults with a known or reported cancer diagnosis who had completed their primary SARS-CoV-2 vaccination schedule were included. This analysis ran from September 1, 2021, to March 4, 2022, a period covering the expansion of the UK's third-dose vaccination booster program.

Interventions

Anti-SARS-CoV-2 COV-S antibody test (Elecsys; Roche).

Main Outcomes and Measures

Odds of SARS-CoV-2 breakthrough infection and COVID-19 hospitalization.

Results

The evaluation comprised 4249 antibody test results from 3555 patients with cancer and 294 230 test results from 225 272 individuals in the noncancer population. The overall cohort of 228 827 individuals (patients with cancer and the noncancer population) comprised 298 479 antibody tests. The median age of the cohort was in the age band of 40 and 49 years and included 182 741 test results (61.22%) from women and 115 737 (38.78%) from men. There were 279 721 tests (93.72%) taken by individuals identifying as White or White British. Patients with cancer were more likely to have undetectable anti-S antibody responses than the general population (199 of 4249 test results [4.68%] vs 376 of 294 230 [0.13%]; P < .001). Patients with leukemia or lymphoma had the lowest antibody titers. In the cancer cohort, following multivariable correction, patients who had an undetectable antibody response were at much greater risk for SARS-CoV-2 breakthrough infection (odds ratio [OR], 3.05; 95% CI, 1.96-4.72; P < .001) and SARS-CoV-2-related hospitalization (OR, 6.48; 95% CI, 3.31-12.67; P < .001) than individuals who had a positive antibody response.

Conclusions and Relevance

The findings of this cross-sectional study suggest that COV-S antibody testing allows the identification of patients with cancer who have the lowest level of antibody-derived protection from COVID-19. This study supports larger evaluations of SARS-CoV-2 antibody testing. Prevention of SARS-CoV-2 transmission to patients with cancer should be prioritized to minimize impact on cancer treatments and maximize quality of life for individuals with cancer during the ongoing pandemic.

COVID-19: Third dose booster vaccine effectiveness against breakthrough coronavirus infection, hospitalisations and death in patients with cancer: A population-based study

PURPOSE

People living with cancer and haematological malignancies are at an increased risk of hospitalisation and death following infection with acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. Coronavirus third dose vaccine boosters are proposed to boost waning immune responses in immunocompromised individuals and increase coronavirus protection; however, their effectiveness has not yet been systematically evaluated.

METHODS

This study is a population-scale real-world evaluation of the United Kingdom's third dose vaccine booster programme for cancer patients from 8th December 2020 to 7th December 2021. The cancer cohort comprises individuals from Public Health England's national cancer dataset, excluding individuals less than 18 years. A test-negative case-control design was used to assess the third dose booster vaccine effectiveness. Multivariable logistic regression models were fitted to compare risk in the cancer cohort relative to the general population.

RESULTS

The cancer cohort comprised of 2,258,553 tests from 361,098 individuals. Third dose boosters were evaluated by reference to 87,039,743 polymerase chain reaction coronavirus tests. Vaccine effectiveness against breakthrough infections, symptomatic infections, coronavirus hospitalisation and death in cancer patients were 59.1%, 62.8%, 80.5% and 94.5%, respectively. Lower vaccine effectiveness was associated with a cancer diagnosis within 12 months, lymphoma, recent systemic anti-cancer therapy (SACT) or radiotherapy. Patients with lymphoma had low levels of protection from symptomatic disease. In spite of third dose boosters, following multivariable adjustment, individuals with cancer remain at an increased risk of coronavirus hospitalisation and death compared to the population control (OR 3.38, 3.01, respectively. p < 0.001 for both).

CONCLUSIONS

Third dose boosters are effective for most individuals with cancer, increasing protection from coronavirus. However, their effectiveness is heterogenous and lower than the general population. Many patients with cancer will remain at the increased risk of coronavirus infections even after 3 doses. In the case of patients with lymphoma, there is a particularly strong disparity of vaccine effectiveness against breakthrough infection and severe disease. Breakthrough infections will disrupt cancer care and treatment with potentially adverse consequences on survival outcomes. The data support the role of vaccine boosters in preventing severe disease, and further pharmacological intervention to prevent transmission and aid viral clearance to limit the disruption of cancer care as the delivery of care continues to evolve during the coronavirus pandemic.

Vaccine effectiveness against COVID-19 breakthrough infections in patients with cancer (UKCCEP): a population-based test-negative case-control study

BACKGROUND

People with cancer are at increased risk of hospitalisation and death following infection with SARS-CoV-2. Therefore, we aimed to conduct one of the first evaluations of vaccine effectiveness against breakthrough SARS-CoV-2 infections in patients with cancer at a population level.

METHODS

In this population-based test-negative case-control study of the UK Coronavirus Cancer Evaluation Project (UKCCEP), we extracted data from the UKCCEP registry on all SARS-CoV-2 PCR test results (from the Second Generation Surveillance System), vaccination records (from the National Immunisation Management Service), patient demographics, and cancer records from England, UK, from Dec 8, 2020, to Oct 15, 2021. Adults (aged ≥18 years) with cancer in the UKCCEP registry were identified via Public Health England's Rapid Cancer Registration Dataset between Jan 1, 2018, and April 30, 2021, and comprised the cancer cohort. We constructed a control population cohort from adults with PCR tests in the UKCCEP registry who were not contained within the Rapid Cancer Registration Dataset. The coprimary endpoints were overall vaccine effectiveness against breakthrough infections after the second dose (positive PCR COVID-19 test) and vaccine effectiveness against breakthrough infections at 3-6 months after the second dose in the cancer cohort and control population.

FINDINGS

The cancer cohort comprised 377 194 individuals, of whom 42 882 had breakthrough SARS-CoV-2 infections. The control population consisted of 28 010 955 individuals, of whom 5 748 708 had SARS-CoV-2 breakthrough infections. Overall vaccine effectiveness was 69·8% (95% CI 69·8-69·9) in the control population and 65·5% (65·1-65·9) in the cancer cohort. Vaccine effectiveness at 3-6 months was lower in the cancer cohort (47·0%, 46·3-47·6) than in the control population (61·4%, 61·4-61·5).

INTERPRETATION

COVID-19 vaccination is effective for individuals with cancer, conferring varying levels of protection against breakthrough infections. However, vaccine effectiveness is lower in patients with cancer than in the general population. COVID-19 vaccination for patients with cancer should be used in conjunction with non-pharmacological strategies and community-based antiviral treatment programmes to reduce the risk that COVID-19 poses to patients with cancer.

FUNDING

University of Oxford, University of Southampton, University of Birmingham, Department of Health and Social Care, and Blood Cancer UK.

Abstract P4-14-12: Influence of socio-economic deprivation score on outcomes for patients diagnosed with early breast cancer over a 9 year follow up at Kings College Hospital, UK

Background: Socio-economic deprivation may have an influence on the outcome for patients diagnosed with breast cancer. The aim of this study was to investigate differences in survival outcome from breast cancer in women from different socio-economic backgrounds and to identify underlying factors that may contribute to any variation.

Material and methods: This is a retrospective analysis of data from female patients diagnosed with early breast cancer at Kings College Hospital, a teaching hospital in London, UK between 2004 and 2012. For this study, mean, standard deviation, range and 50th percentile were calculated for the variables investigated. Incidence of death was estimated for deprivation quintile, ethnicity and year of diagnosis. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to estimate the relationship between survival and the several variables (deprivation, income score and ethnicity). The survival rates between levels of deprivation were compared using Kaplan Meier survival curve and log-rank test.

Results: A total of 330 women with a diagnosis of early breast cancer were identified. Analysis of data on all patients (n=330) showed that the median survival time at which 50% of the patients survive is 4018 days (95% CI: 2556, 5479). Deprivation quintile ranged from levels 1 to 5 with level 1 defined as ‘affluent’ and level 5 being ‘most deprived’. These scores were reported for a total of 80 patients. Forty of these were alive and 40 had died from metastatic breast cancer. The two groups were matched for age, year of diagnosis and stage of disease. The highest incidence of death (19/33; 58%) was in level 5 of the deprivation quintile. There was no difference in patients’ survival rates between the 5 levels of the deprivation quintile. There was no difference between survival rates in white ethnic group compared with the black (χ2=0.03, p=0.86). There was no evidence of significance in relationship between hazard of death and deprivation in black and white ethnic groups. Similarly, there was no evidence of significance in relationship between hazard of death and income score in black and white ethnic groups. Adjusting for ethnicity also showed that deprivation and income score had no effect on hazard of death.

Conclusion: According to our study higher degree of socio-economic deprivation is associated with higher mortality in breast cancer. Previous studies from different hospitals in UK have shown that black women have a significantly poorer outcome that white patients despite equal access to healthcare. Our study has shown that there is no correlation between ethnicity (white ethnic and black groups) and survival rates, hazard of death or deprivation in patients treated in Kings College Hospital.

Citation Format: Olga Oikonomidou, Mercy Ofuya, Anne S Rigg. Influence of socio-economic deprivation score on outcomes for patients diagnosed with early breast cancer over a 9 year follow up at Kings College Hospital, UK [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Seventh Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2014 Dec 9-13; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(9 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-14-12.

Adenoviral delivery of TIMP1 or TIMP2 can modify the invasive behavior of pancreatic cancer and can have a significant antitumor effect in vivo

Pancreatic carcinomas overexpress several matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), in particular MMP2 and MMP9. These enzymes are involved in the degradation of the extracellular matrix to aid tumor cell invasion. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of TIMP gene therapy on human pancreatic cancer. Human TIMP1 or TIMP2 has been introduced in pancreatic tumor cells under the control of a constitutive promoter using adenoviral vectors, and the effect on tumor invasion observed. It has been demonstrated in vitro that the TIMP-expressing pancreatic tumor cells were significantly less invasive than those cells transfected with a control vector. In vivo, adenoviral delivery of TIMP1 or TIMP2 to nude mice harboring intraperitoneal human pancreatic cancers resulted in prolonged survival compared with control mice if the gene therapy was given early (P<.009 and P<.0293, respectively). The in vivo experiments demonstrated evidence of gene transfer by adenoviral vectors to tumor cells and murine mesenteric cells. There was no evidence of transgene expression in distant organs. These experiments have proved the hypothesis that TIMP overexpression in pancreatic cancer cells can modify the invasive phenotype. Also, TIMP gene transfer to human tumor cells is possible both in vitro and in vivo.

Oncological applications of gene therapy

Despite the rapid technological advances that continue to sustain the field of cancer gene therapy, few individual patients have benefited from the revolution so far. The plethora of clinical trials described confirms that each malignancy will have its own ideal strategy based on the associated molecular defects, and there has been rapid progress from this viewpoint. At the same time, there has been a renewed appreciation for the limitations to gene therapy, which include low efficiency of gene transfer, poor specificity of response and methods to accurately evaluate responses, and lack of truly tumor-specific targets at which to aim. As with all new therapies, we are climbing a steep learning curve in terms encountering treatment-related toxicities, as well as profound ethical and regulatory issues.

Gene therapy: recent progress in the clinical oncology arena

Despite the rapid technological advances that continue to sustain the field of cancer gene therapy, few individual patients have benefited from the revolution so far. The plethora of clinical trials described confirms that each malignancy will have its own ideal strategy based on the associated molecular defects, and there has been rapid progress from this viewpoint. At the same time, there has been a renewed appreciation for the limitations to gene therapy, which include low efficiency of gene transfer, poor specificity of response and methods to accurately evaluate responses, and lack of truly tumor-specific targets at which to aim. As with all new therapies, we are climbing a steep learning curve in terms encountering treatment-related toxicities, as well as profound ethical and regulatory issues.