Targets for deprescribing in patients with hypertension and reflex syncope

BACKGROUND

We aimed to identify the target of deprescribing, i.e. the 24-hour SBP increase needed to achieve the greatest reduction of SBP drops.

METHOD

Forty hypertensive patients (mean age 73.6 ± 9.3 years, 26 females) with reflex syncope and SBP drops on a screening ABPM were advised to withdraw or to reduce their therapy. The study objective was the reduction of SBP drops <90 mmHg and <100 mmHg on a second ABPM performed within 3 months.

RESULTS

Out of a total of 98 drugs taken during ABPM 1, 44 were withdrawn, 16 had a dose reduction and 38 remained unchanged at the time of ABPM 2. 24-hour SBP increased from 119.7 ± 10.1 mmHg to 129.4 ± 13.2 mmHg during ABPM2. Total disappearance of daytime SBP drops <100 mmHg was achieved in 20 (50 %) patients who had 24-hour SBP of 134±13 mmHg and an increase from ABPM 1 of 12 (IQR 5-20) mmHg. Compared with the 20 patients who had persistence of drops, these patients had a greater reduction of the number of hypotensive drugs (67 % versus 19 %, p = 0.002) and a greater rate of withdrawals (62 % versus 29 %, p = 0.003).

CONCLUSION

In hypertensive patients with reflex syncope, an increase of 12 mmHg and an absolute value of 24-hour SBP of 134 mmHg appear to represent the optimal goals aimed to prevent SBP drops. Drugs withdrawal, rather than simply dose reduction, is mostly required to achieve the above target.

Interventions aimed to increase average 24-h systolic blood pressure reduce blood pressure drops in patients with reflex syncope and orthostatic intolerance

AIMS

Systolic blood pressure (SBP) drops recorded by 24-h ambulatory blood pressure (BP) monitoring (ABPM) identify patients with susceptibility to reflex syncope and orthostatic intolerance. We tested the hypothesis that treatments aimed to increase BP (reassurance, education, and lifestyle measures plus pharmacological strategies) can reduce SBP drops.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This was a multicentre, observational proof-of-concept study performed in patients with reflex syncope and/or orthostatic intolerance and with SBP drops on a screening ABPM. Among 144 eligible patients, 111 underwent a second ABPM on average 2.5 months after start of treatment. Overall, mean 24-h SBP increased from 114.1 ± 12.1 to 121.4 ± 14.5 mmHg (P < 0.0001). The number of SBP drops <90 and <100 mmHg decreased by 61%, 46% during daytime, and by 48% and 37% during 24-h period, respectively (P < 0.0001 for all). The dose-response relationship between difference in 24-h average SBP increase and reduction in number of SBP drops reached a plateau around ∼15 mmHg increase of 24-h SBP. The reduction in SBP drop rate was consistent and significant in patients who underwent deprescription of hypotensive medications (n = 44) and in patients who received BP-rising drugs (n = 67).

CONCLUSION

In patients with reflex syncope and/or orthostatic intolerance, an increase in average 24-h SBP, regardless of the implemented strategy, significantly reduced the number of SBP drops and symptom burden. A 13 mmHg increase in 24-h SBP appears to represent the optimal goal for aborting the maximal number of SBP drops, representing a possible target for future interventions. ClincalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05729724.

The Rate of Asystolic Reflex Syncope Is Not Influenced by Age

BACKGROUND

The head-up tilt test (HUT) and other evidence suggest that the vagal effect on the heart decreases with age.

OBJECTIVES

The main aim of the study was to assess whether this age effect also affects the rate of asystole in spontaneous reflex syncope (RS).

METHOD

We performed an analysis of pooled individual data from 4 studies that recruited patients ≥40 years of age affected by certain or suspected RS who received an implantable loop recorder (ILR) and reported follow-up data on syncope recurrence. We assessed the presence of asystolic syncope of >3 seconds or nonsyncopal asystole of >6 seconds recorded by ILR and compared the findings to tilt test results on the same patients.

RESULTS

A total of 1,046 patients received ILR because of unexplained syncope. Of these, 201 (19.2%) had a documentation of an asystolic event of 10-second (Q1-Q3: 6- to 15-second) duration. They were subdivided in 3 age tertiles: ≤60 years (n = 64), 61 to 72 years (n = 72), and ≥73 years (n = 65). The rate of asystolic events was similar in the 3 subgroups (50.1%, 50.1%, and 49.2%, respectively; P = 0.99). Conversely, the rate of asystolic syncope induced during HUT (performed in 169 of 201) was greatly age dependent (31.0%, 12.1%, and 11.1% in increasing age tertiles, respectively; P = 0.009).

CONCLUSIONS

The rate of the spontaneous asystolic form of RS documented by ILR is constant at any age >40 years. Conversely, the rate of asystolic syncope induced by HUT is higher in younger patients and decreases with age. The contrasting results between spontaneous and tilt-induced events cast doubt on the concept that asystole in RS is less common in older patients.

Detection of impending reflex syncope by means of an integrated multisensor patch-type recorder

We assessed the capability of an integrated multisensory patch-type monitor (RootiRx®) in detecting episodes of reflex (pre)syncope induced by tilt table test (TTT). Firstly, we performed an intrapatient comparison of cuffless systolic blood pressure (SBP), R-R interval (RRI) and variability (power spectrum analysis) obtained by means of the RootiRx® with those obtained with conventional methods (CONV) with validated finger pressure devices at baseline in supine position and repeatedly during TTT in 32 patients affected by likely reflex syncope. Secondly, the LF/HF values obtained with RootiRx® during TTT were analyzed in 50 syncope patients. Compared with baseline supine recordings, during TTT a decrement of median SBP was observed with CONV (-53.5 mmHg) but not with RootiRx® ®(-1 mmHg). Conversely, RRI reduction (CONV: 102 ms; RootiRx®: 127 ms) and RRI Low Frequency/High Frequency powers ratio (LF/HF) increase (CONV: 1.6; RootiRx®: 2.5) were similar. The concordance was good for RRI (0.97 [95% CI 0.96-0.98]) and fair for LF/HF ratio (0.69 [95% CI 0.46-0.83]). During the first 5 min of TTT the LF/HF ratio was higher in patients who later developed syncope than in no-syncope patients. This ratio was significantly different among patients with syncope, presyncope or without symptoms at the time of syncope (p value = 0.02). In conclusion, cuffless RootiRx® was unable to detect rapid drops of SBP occurring during impending reflex syncope and thus cannot be used as a diagnostic tool for hypotensive syncope. On the other hand, RRI mean values and LF/HF power ratios obtained with RootiRx® were consistent with those simultaneously obtained using conventional methods.

Adenosinergic System and Neuroendocrine Syncope: What Is the Link?

Although very common, the precise mechanisms that explain the symptomatology of neuroendocrine syncope (NES) remain poorly understood. This disease, which can be very incapacitating, manifests itself as a drop in blood pressure secondary to vasodilation and/or extreme slowing of heart rate. As studies continue, the involvement of the adenosinergic system is becoming increasingly evident. Adenosine, which is an ATP derivative, may be involved in a large number of cases. Adenosine acts on G protein-coupled receptors with seven transmembrane domains. A1 and A2A adenosine receptor dysfunction seem to be particularly implicated since the activation leads to severe bradycardia or vasodilation, respectively, two cardinal symptoms of NES. This mini-review aims to shed light on the links between dysfunction of the adenosinergic system and NHS. In particular, signal transduction pathways through the modulation of cAMP production and ion channels in relation to effects on the cardiovascular system are addressed. A better understanding of these mechanisms could guide the pharmacological development of new therapeutic approaches.

Prevalence of asystole during tilt test-induced vasovagal syncope may depend on test methodology

This review addresses tilt-testing methodology by searching the literature which reports timing of asystole and loss of consciousness (LOC). Despite the Italian protocol being the most widely adopted, its stipulations are not always followed to the letter of the European Society of Cardiology guidelines. The discrepancies permit reassessment of the incidence of asystole when tilt-down is early, impending syncope, compared with late, established LOC. Asystole is uncommon with early tilt down and diminishes with increasing age. However, if LOC is established as test-end, asystole is more common, and it is age-independent. Thus, the implications are that asystole is commonly under-diagnosed by early tilt-down. The prevalence of asystolic responses observed using the Italian protocol with a rigorous tilt down time is numerically close to that observed during spontaneous attacks by electrocardiogram loop recorder. Recently, tilt-testing has been questioned as to its validity but, in selection of pacemaker therapy in older highly symptomatic vasovagal syncope patients, the occurrence of asystole has been shown to be an effective guide for treatment. The use of head-up tilt test as an indication for cardiac pacing therapy requires pursuing the test until complete LOC. This review offers explanations for the findings and their applicability to practice. A novel interpretation is offered to explain why pacing induced earlier may combat vasodepression by raising the heart rate when sufficient blood remains in the heart.

Tests for the identification of reflex syncope mechanism

INTRODUCTION

Treatment efficacy of reflex syncope is mainly related to the mechanism underlying syncope rather than its etiology or clinical presentation. The predominant mechanism underlying reflex syncope can be assigned to hypotensive or to bradycardic phenotypes.

AREAS COVERED

Methodology and diagnostic criteria of the most useful tests for the identification of hypotensive and bradycardic phenotypes are discussed. Diagnostic tests for the hypotensive phenotype include office blood pressure measurement with active standing test, home, and wearable blood pressure monitoring, 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and tilt table test. Diagnostic tests for the bradycardic phenotype include carotid sinus massage, tilt table test and prolonged ECG monitoring.

EXPERT OPINION

In reflex syncope, the documentation of bradycardia/asystole during a syncopal episode does not rule out the possibility that a preceding or parallel hypotensive reflex plays an important role. Similarly, even when a hypotensive mechanism is established, the possibility of an associated cardioinhibitory reflex should be investigated. Investigating the mechanism of reflex syncope is mandatory in patients with severe recurrent episodes, with the final aim to develop a personalized treatment strategy. Recent trials have demonstrated the benefits of personalized mechanism-based therapy, thus highlighting the importance of a comprehensive assessment of the mechanisms underlying syncope.

New definition of hypotension in patients with reflex syncope using 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (SynABPM Study)

Background

Diagnostic criteria for ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) in patients with suspected reflex syncope are lacking.

Purpose

We hypothesized that patients with reflex syncope have a higher prevalence of systolic blood pressure (SBP) drops on ABPM than control subjects and we aimed to define the SBP cut-off values that allow identification of patients with hypotensive susceptibility.

Methods

We compared ABPM data from reflex syncope patients and controls, matched by average 24-hour SBP, age, sex and hypertension. Patients with constitutional hypotension, orthostatic hypotension, predominant cardioinhibition or competing causes of syncope were excluded. Daytime and night-time SBP drops (&lt;110, 100, 90, 80 mmHg) were assessed. Findings were validated in an independent sample.

Results

In the Derivation cohort, daytime SBP drops were significantly more common in 158 syncope patients than 329 controls. One or more daytime drop &lt;90 mmHg provided the best diagnostic yield (91% specificity, 32% sensitivity, Odds Ratio [OR]=4.6, p=0.001). Two or more-daytime drops &lt;100 mmHg achieved 84% specificity and 40% sensitivity (OR=3.5, p=0.001). Results were confirmed in the Validation cohort: one or more daytime SBP drop &lt;90 mmHg provided 94% specificity and 29% sensitivity (OR=6.2, p&lt;0.001), while two or more daytime SBP drops &lt;100 mmHg achieved 83% specificity and 35% sensitivity (OR=2.6, p&lt;0.001) (Figure 1).

Conclusion

SBP drops during ABPM are more common in reflex syncope patients than in controls. Cut-off values that may be applied in clinical practice are defined. This study expands the current indications for ABPM to patients with reflex syncope.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: None.

Feasibility of Blood Pressure Measurement With a Wearable (Watch-Type) Monitor During Impending Syncopal Episodes

Background

We assessed the reliability and feasibility of blood pressure (BP) measurements by means of a new wearable watch‐type BP monitor (HeartGuide) in detecting episodes of hypotensive (pre)syncope induced by tilt table test.

Methods and Results

An intrapatient comparison between systolic BP (SBP) measured by means of the HeartGuide device and noninvasive finger beat‐to‐beat BP monitoring was undertaken both at baseline in supine position and repeatedly during tilt table test in patients evaluated for reflex syncope. Intrapatient fall of systolic BP from baseline was measured. Eighty‐one patients (mean age, 61±19 years; 46 women) were included. Overall, HeartGuide was able to yield BP values at the time of BP nadir in 58 (72%) patients (average HeartGuide SBP 102±18 mm Hg, versus finger SBP 101±19 mm Hg). Compared with baseline, the maximum SBP decrease was on average −28.5±27.8 and −30.3±33.9 mm Hg respectively (Lin's concordance correlation coefficient=0.78, r=0.79, P=0.001). In the subgroup of 38 patients with tilt table test induced (pre)syncope, the average HeartGuide SBP during symptoms was 97±16 mm Hg, and the finger SBP was 94±18 mm Hg. Compared with baseline, the maximum SBP decrease was on average −35.2±29.3 and −43.3±31.8 mm Hg, respectively (Lin's concordance correlation coefficient=0.83, r=0.87, P=0.001).

Conclusions

Our data indicate that the HeartGuide BP monitor can detect low BP during presyncope and that its measure of SBP change is consistent with that simultaneously obtained through continuous BP monitoring, despite some intrapatient variability. Thus, this device might be useful in determining the hypotensive nature of spontaneous (pre)syncopal symptoms, a possibility that should be verified by field studies.

Adenosine Concentration in Patients With Neurally Mediated Syncope

Background

Either high or low values of adenosine blood level (ABL) can differentiate some forms of neurally mediated syncope (NMS). A rapid method of measurement has recently been developed. The aim of the present study was: (1) to compare ABLs in an unselected population of consecutive patients referred for evaluation of suspected NMS syncope and in healthy controls; and (2) to assess the relative prevalence of low and high adenosine forms among an unselected syncope population.

Method

Whole blood was collected after finger puncture, blood being deposit on a blot paper and adenosine concentration was measured by liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS).

Results

Among 89 control subjects, the median ABL value was 0.54 μM (IQR, 0.46–0.65). The lowest 5% and the upper 95% percentile were 0.40 and 0.80 μM, respectively. Compared with healthy subjects, the 146 patients with syncope showed, on average, a higher median ABL value [0.63 (IQR 0.45–0.73, p = 0.04)] and a larger distribution of values. Low ABL values below the 5th percentile were observed in 28 (19%) patients, and, in five controls, p = 0.003 and high ABL values were observed in 26 (18%) patients and five controls, p = 0.009.

Conclusions

ABL is different in patients with suspected NMS than in healthy subjects. Patients with low and high adenosine values account for 19% and 18% of the general population. Thus, low and high ABL limits, as defined in this study, may help to define the purinergic profile of unselected subjects with a clinical diagnosis of suspected NMS.

Association between hypotension during 24 h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and reflex syncope: the SynABPM 1 study

AIMS

Diagnostic criteria for ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) in patients with suspected reflex syncope are lacking. The study hypothesis was that patients with reflex syncope have a higher prevalence of systolic blood pressure (SBP) drops on ABPM.

METHODS AND RESULTS

ABPM data from reflex syncope patients and controls, matched by average 24 h SBP, age, sex, and hypertension were compared. Patients with constitutional hypotension, orthostatic hypotension, and predominant cardioinhibition during carotid sinus massage or prolonged electrocardiogram monitoring or competing causes of syncope were excluded. Daytime and nighttime SBP drops (<110, 100, 90, 80 mmHg) were assessed. Findings were validated in an independent sample. In the derivation sample, daytime SBP drops were significantly more common in 158 syncope patients than 329 controls. One or more daytime drops <90 mmHg achieved 91% specificity and 32% sensitivity [odds ratio (OR) 4.6, P < 0.001]. Two or more daytime drops <100 mmHg achieved 84% specificity and 40% sensitivity (OR 3.5, P = 0.001). Results were confirmed in the validation sample of 164 syncope patients and 164 controls: one or more daytime SBP drops <90 mmHg achieved 94% specificity and 29% sensitivity (OR 6.2, P < 0.001), while two or more daytime SBP drops <100 mmHg achieved 83% specificity and 35% sensitivity (OR 2.6, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

SBP drops during ABPM are more common in reflex syncope patients than in controls. Cut-off values that may be applied in clinical practice are defined. This study expands the current indications for ABPM to patients with reflex syncope.

Adenosine Receptor Reserve and Long-Term Potentiation: Unconventional Adaptive Mechanisms in Cardiovascular Diseases?

While the concept of a receptor reserve (spare receptors) is old, their presence on human cells as an adaptive mechanism in cardiovascular disease is a new suggestion. The presence of spare receptors is suspected when the activation of a weak fraction of receptors leads to maximal biological effects, in other words, when the half-maximal effective concentration (EC₅₀) for a biological effect (cAMP production, for example) is lower than the affinity (K_D) of the ligand for a receptor. Adenosine is an ATP derivative that strongly impacts the cardiovascular system via its four membrane receptors, named A₁R, A_2AR, A_2BR, and A₃R, with the A₁R being more particularly involved in heart rhythm, while the A_2AR controls vasodilation. After a general description of the tools necessary to explore the presence of spare receptors, this review focuses on the consequences of the presence of spare adenosine receptors in cardiovascular physiopathology. Finally, the role of the adenosinergic system in the long-term potentiation and its possible consequences on the physiopathology are also mentioned.

Plasma adenosine and neurally mediated syncope: ready for clinical use

Either central or peripheral baroreceptor reflex abnormalities and/or alterations in neurohumoral mechanisms play a pivotal role in the genesis of neurally mediated syncope. Thus, improving our knowledge of the biochemical mechanisms underlying specific forms of neurally mediated syncope (more properly termed 'neurohumoral syncope') might allow the development of new therapies that are effective in this specific subgroup. A low-adenosine phenotype of neurohumoral syncope has recently been identified. Patients who suffer syncope without prodromes and have a normal heart display a purinergic profile which is the opposite of that observed in vasovagal syncope patients and is characterized by very low-adenosine plasma level values, low expression of A2A receptors and the predominance of the TC variant in the single nucleotide c.1364 C>T polymorphism of the A2A receptor gene. The typical mechanism of syncope is an idiopathic paroxysmal atrioventricular block or sinus bradycardia, most often followed by sinus arrest. Since patients with low plasma adenosine levels are highly susceptible to endogenous adenosine, chronic treatment of these patients with theophylline, a non-selective adenosine receptor antagonist, is expected to prevent syncopal recurrences. This hypothesis is supported by results from series of cases and from observational controlled studies.

Pulsed intravenous methylprednisolone combined with oral steroids as a treatment for poorly responsive type 2 amiodarone-induced thyrotoxicosis

OBJECTIVES

Amiodarone-induced thyrotoxicosis (AIT) affects up to 3% of treated patients. Type 2 AIT (AIT2) is a destructive thyroiditis and is usually treated with medium-high oral doses of prednisone. As AIT may worsen the underlying heart disease, a rapid control of thyroid function is desirable. We aimed to determine whether a combined intravenous methylprednisolone (IVMP) pulses therapy associated to prednisone in the interpulse period can represent an efficient and safe alternative to urgent total thyroidectomy in patients with AIT2 not responsive to prednisone alone.

DESIGN AND METHODS

Patients presenting with a severe AIT2 studied in a tertiary referral Center from August 2018 to April 2019. We included four patients requiring a rapid improvement of thyroid function for their underlying cardiac disorders. The baseline doses of oral prednisone (range: 5-12.5 mg/day) and IVMP (range: 250-500 twice a week) were determined according to the severity of the thyrotoxicosis and were titrated based on clinical response.

RESULTS

Combined treatment was effective in all patients in the prompt restoration of euthyroidism and no major adverse events were reported during the follow-up. In all cases, FT4 and FT3 levels normalized at 3-5 weeks of treatment. A permanent hypothyroidism was observed in one patient, 3 months after the discontinuation of treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

We report for the first time that the combined intravenous and oral steroid therapy is effective in patients with AIT2. The treatment is well tolerated and leads to a rapid improvement of thyroid function, avoiding urgent total thyroidectomy and favoring a quick functional recovery and rehabilitation of cardiac patients.

Validation of the Omron M5-I, R5-I and HEM-907 automated blood pressure monitors in elderly individuals according to the International Protocol of the European Society of Hypertension

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed at verifying the accuracy of three automated electronic oscillometric blood pressure measuring devices, namely Omron M5-I (home use upper arm monitor), R5-I (home use wrist monitor) and HEM-907 (professional use upper arm monitor) according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol in elderly individuals.

METHODS

Sequential measurements of systolic and diastolic blood pressure were obtained in 33 participants (aged >or=75 years) using the mercury sphygmomanometer (two observers) and each of the tested devices (one supervisor). A standard adult cuff was always employed during the study because all participants had an arm circumference compatible with such a cuff. According to the European Society of Hypertension validation protocol 99 couples (three pairs per patient) of test device and reference blood pressure measurements were obtained during phase 1 (15 participants studied) and phase 2 (a further 18 participants) for each electronic monitor.

RESULTS

All devices successfully passed the validation study with a mean (+/-SD) device-observer difference for systolic and diastolic blood pressure of 0.2+/-3.6/0.2+/-3.9 mmHg (Omron M5-I), -1.5+/-6.2/-0.7+/-3.7 mmHg (Omron R5-I), and 0.1+/-5.1/-1.9+/-4.2 mmHg (Omron HEM-907). SD of the mean difference was lower and thus the precision was better for diastolic than for systolic blood pressure, and for the Omron M5-I than for the other two devices.

CONCLUSIONS

According to the results of the validation study based on the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol the Omron M5-I, R5-I, and HEM-907 may be recommended for clinical use in elderly individuals, without atrial fibrillation or frequent ectopic beats.

Assessment of overall blood pressure variability and its different components

Blood pressure (BP) is characterized by continuous fluctuations, including fast changes lasting only a few seconds as well as slower and more prolonged variations, with a time constant of minutes or hours. Assessing the relative contribution of these different components to overall blood pressure variance is now possible through a number of mathematical approaches, either in the time or in the frequency domain (spectral analysis). Due to its complex nature, a precise and detailed assessment of blood pressure variability can be obtained only from the analysis of continuous, beat-by-beat, blood pressure recordings. Some information, however, can also be derived from analysis of discontinuous blood pressure tracings, such as those commonly performed in a clinical setting. This would require that attention is paid both to the quality of the recordings and to the selection of suitable analysis methods that should cope with the discontinuous nature of the measurements to be processed and to their intrinsic low sampling frequency.

Variable day/night bias in 24-h non-invasive finger pressure against intrabrachial artery pressure is removed by waveform filtering and level correction

BACKGROUND Twenty-four-hour finger arterial pressure (FAP) recordings show a negative bias against intrabrachial artery pressure (BAP) and the bias is greater during the night, thereby overestimating the nocturnal blood pressure dip. We have available a methodology with which to reconstruct BAP from FAP by waveform filtering (transfer function) and generalized level (bias) correction that reduces the bias for short-term blood pressure records. OBJECTIVE To investigate if this methodology also decreases the extra bias during the night, thereby yielding a better estimate of the nocturnal dip. METHODS Twenty-four-hour FAP and BAP blood pressure recordings were simultaneously obtained in eight healthy normotensive volunteers and 14 patients with hypertension (ages 19-60 years), during standardized scheduled activities. The data were analysed off-line, applying the brachial reconstruction technique (reBAP) consisting of a waveform filter and level correction. Simultaneous beats yielded systolic, diastolic and mean pressures that were averaged per 30 min, per day, per night, per activity, over the 24-h period, and for volunteers and patients separately. RESULTS Over the full 24 h, FAP systolic, diastolic and mean values for the total group differed from BAP by +1 +/- 10, -8 +/- 7 and -10 +/- 8 mmHg (mean +/- SD), respectively. Similarly, reBAPs differed by +1 +/- 11, -2 +/- 7 and -2 +/- 7 mmHg. BAPs dipped by 20 +/- 8, 13 +/- 6 and 15 +/- 6 mmHg, respectively, during the night. These dips were overestimated by +8, +4 and +4 mmHg by FAP, but not by reBAP: -1, +1 and +1 mmHg. The volunteer and the patient groups showed slight differences in results, but these were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS The generalized reconstruction technique to obtain near-brachial pressure from non-invasive FAP almost completely removed bias over the full 24-h day-night period and improved tracking of diurnal changes for all three blood pressure values.

[Blood pressure variability]

This review deals with a number of issues related to blood pressure variability. These include: historical aspects, with reference to the first pioneering observations; methodological aspects, focusing on the different methods for quantifying blood pressure variability; description of the characteristics of blood pressure variability over the 24 hours; mechanisms involved in determining the different magnitude of this phenomenon in different subjects, such as behavioral factors, central and reflex neural influences, humoral and mechanical factors; blood pressure variability as a probe to assess spontaneous baroreflex sensitivity; effects of aging and hypertension on blood pressure variability, with a discussion of the clinical relevance of this phenomenon in the prognostic evaluation of patients; effects of drugs on blood pressure variability. Finally methodological aspects related to the use of noninvasive ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in the assessment of blood pressure variability are discussed.

Smoking impairs baroreflex sensitivity in humans

In 10 healthy smokers, finger blood pressure was recorded continuously for 1 h in a supine control condition and for 1 h while smoking four cigarettes, one every 15 min. Smoking increased average systolic blood pressure (+19%, P < 0.01) and its variability and reduced pulse interval (reciprocal of heart rate, -22%, P < 0.01) and its variability. Baroreflex sensitivity, as assessed by the slope of spontaneous hypertension/bradycardia or hypotension/tachycardia sequences and by the alpha-coefficient (squared ratio between pulse interval and systolic blood pressure spectral powers at 0.1 Hz) was significantly decreased (P < 0.01) during smoking, whereas there were no effects of smoking on the reflex changes in pulse interval induced by carotid baroreceptor stimulation through a neck suction device. Sham smoking by a drinking straw had no effects on any of the above parameters. Thus, when assessed in the absence of laboratory maneuvers in daily life conditions, baroreflex sensitivity is markedly impaired by smoking. This impairment may contribute to the smoking-induced increase in blood pressure and heart rate as well as to the concomitant alterations in their variability.

Performance of the AM-5600 blood pressure monitor: comparison with ambulatory intra-arterial pressure

The AM-5600 is a new device that simultaneously monitors electrocardiogram (ECG) and noninvasive blood pressure (BP) over a 24-h period. BP readings (Korotkoff sounds and cuff air pressure) are stored into the recorder, allowing the removal of BP artifacts after a visual check. In 12 subjects with essential hypertension, we compared BP values simultaneously provided by the AM-5600 and intra-arterial recordings. At rest, noninvasive systolic BP (SBP) values were lower (5.4 +/- 4.9 mmHg) and diastolic BP (DBP) values were higher (7.3 +/- 7.3 mmHg) than were intra-arterial values. In ambulatory conditions (9 subjects), between-method discrepancies were +0.8 +/- 6.1 and +12.2 +/- 7.4 mmHg for 24-h SBP and DBP, respectively. AM-5600 underestimated 24-h intra-arterial SBP and DBP SD, but it accurately tracked intra-arterial SBP and DBP changes. Editing removed 22.1% of total readings, slightly reducing between-method discrepancies. Thus the AM-5600 provides an accurate average estimate of resting and ambulatory SBP and, for DBP, a less accurate estimate that is slightly improved by editing. The AM-5600 allows accurate description of SBP and DBP profiles and thus may be suitable to describe the abrupt BP changes accompanying a number of clinical events.

Blood pressure reduction and end-organ damage in hypertension

VALUE OF AMBULATORY BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING: Studies that have used ambulatory blood pressure monitoring techniques have shown that the average 24-h or daytime blood pressure values are more closely related to the end-organ damage associated with hypertension than are isolated office readings. IMPORTANCE OF BLOOD PRESSURE VARIABILITY IN PROGNOSIS: More recently, blood pressure variability, measured as the overall 24-h blood pressure standard deviation, has been shown to have a significant relationship to end-organ damage in hypertensive patients. The potential clinical relevance of blood pressure variability has been strengthened in a recent prospective study. The possible prognostic value of blood pressure variability has practical implications for antihypertensive treatment; it may mean, for example, that the optimal antihypertensive drug should reduce not only the mean 24-h values but also the degree of fluctuation in blood pressure. This is more likely to occur with long-acting drugs, which induce a more balanced reduction in blood pressure throughout the 24 h. USE OF THE TROUGH:PEAK RATIO: A proposed measure of a balanced 24-h blood pressure effect is the trough:peak ratio of the blood pressure fall. This ratio can be obtained by clinic blood pressure measurements but ambulatory blood pressure monitoring offers some distinct advantages. One of these advantages is that by revealing the possibility of an excessive fall in blood pressure at the time of the peak effect or an uncontrolled rise at the trough, ambulatory monitoring can also reveal the possible impact of pharmacological treatment on 24-h blood pressure variability.

Blood pressure variability: clinical implications and effects of antihypertensive treatment

HYPOTHESIS ON RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN BLOOD PRESSURE VARIABILITY AND END-ORGAN DAMAGE: Several studies have shown that the cardiovascular complications of hypertension are more closely related to ambulatory 24-h or daytime average blood pressure than to office readings. A few studies have also provided evidence that in hypertensive patients, not only average ambulatory blood pressure but also the degree of blood pressure variability is significantly and independently related to the end-organ damage associated with hypertension. LIMITATIONS OF PREVIOUS STUDIES: A common limitation of previous studies is that they were based on cross-sectional or retrospective observations, so that the correlative evidence they provide does not allow the relationship between blood pressure variability and end-organ damage to be interpreted causally. EVIDENCE FROM RECENT STUDIES: Recent evidence from follow-up observations has strongly supported the hypothesis that blood pressure variability is prognostically important in hypertensive patients. These findings suggest that optimal antihypertensive treatment should aim not only to reduce mean blood pressure levels, but also to reduce the degree of blood pressure fluctuation. EFFECTS OF ANTIHYPERTENSIVE DRUGS: Unfortunately, while most new antihypertensive drugs seem to be effective in reducing 24-h mean blood pressure levels, they are frequently unable to reduce 24-h blood pressure variability, which is often increased during treatment when expressed in normalized units. The development of drugs that guarantee a constant and uniform reduction in blood pressure over 24 h may, in principle, offer a further advantage by preventing the increase in 24-h blood pressure fluctuations that may follow the administration of short-acting antihypertensive agents. TROUGH: PEAK MEASUREMENTS OF BLOOD PRESSURE: The trough: peak ratio, proposed as an arithmetic indicator of the duration of the antihypertensive effect of a drug, may be a useful measure of the occurrence of a smooth reduction in blood pressure over 24 h. The possibility of obtaining an additional reduction in cardiovascular risk for hypertensive patients by minimizing the net trough: peak effect of antihypertensive drugs is thus an important issue for future studies.

Noninvasive automatic blood pressure monitoring does not attenuate nighttime hypotension. Evidence from 24 h intraarterial blood pressure monitoring

Automatic ambulatory blood pressure monitoring makes use of repeated cuff inflations throughout the day and night. This may interfere with the cardiovascular effects of sleep and thus alter the 24 h blood pressure profile. The possibility that intermittent automatic blood pressure measurements prevent nocturnal hypotension was examined in 17 mild or moderate essential hypertensive patients in whom blood pressure was recorded intraarterially for 48 h by the Oxford technique. During the first or the second 24 h period, blood pressure was also monitored noninvasively by the SpaceLabs (Redmond, WA) 5300 (n = 10) and by the Sandoz Pressure System SPS 1558 (Lavanchy Electronique, Prilly, Switzerland) (n = 7) devices, automatic measurements being performed at 15 min intervals during the day and at 30 min intervals during the night. Separate computer analysis of 24 h intraarterial tracings obtained in absence and in concomitance of contralateral automatic blood pressure monitoring showed that the occurrence of automatic measurements had not interfered with the day-night intraarterial blood pressure and heart rate profiles. Thus the frequent cuff inflations that characterize automatic blood pressure monitoring do not attenuate nighttime hypotension and bradycardia. This finding supports use of the noninvasive approach in assessing blood pressure profiles.

Evaluation of noninvasive blood pressure monitoring devices Spacelabs 90202 and 90207 versus resting and ambulatory 24-hour intra-arterial blood pressure

This study evaluated the accuracy of blood pressure values provided by the Spacelabs 90202 and 90207 devices in comparison with intra-arterial recording in 19 subjects at rest and in nine subjects in ambulatory conditions (Oxford method). At rest Spacelabs monitors reflected intra-arterial systolic blood pressure values very closely but overestimated to a considerable extent intra-arterial diastolic blood pressure (Spacelabs-intra-arterial differences, -0.8 +/- 9.2, NS, and 9.1 +/- 8.8 mm Hg, p less than 0.01, for systolic and diastolic blood pressures, respectively). In ambulatory conditions Spacelabs-intra-arterial average differences in 24-hour values were +0.4 +/- 5.1 mm Hg for systolic blood pressure (NS) and +14.0 +/- 2.9 mm Hg for diastolic blood pressure (p less than 0.01) when group data were considered. The performance of both Spacelabs devices was worse when assessed in individual subjects or for each hourly interval. In spite of these differences between noninvasive and intra-arterial absolute blood pressure values, however, Spacelabs 90202 and 90207 monitors were able to faithfully reflect directional hour-to-hour changes in intra-arterial blood pressure (chi 2 = 18.2 and chi 2 = 23.1 for systolic and diastolic blood pressures, respectively, p less than 0.01). No differences were found between the performance of the two Spacelabs devices. Thus, although the absolute accuracy of blood pressure values provided by these monitors in ambulatory subjects is still limited, they seem to be suitable for studies aimed at assessing 24-hour blood pressure profiles quantitatively as well as qualitatively.

Persistent blood pressure increase induced by heavy smoking

OBJECTIVE

To test the hypothesis that heavy smoking is associated with a persistent increase in blood pressure.

DESIGN

In 10 normotensive smokers asked to smoke one cigarette every 15 min for 1 h, blood pressure and heart rate were continuously monitored during the smoking period and during the preceding non-smoking hour. In six other normotensive smokers asked to smoke two cigarettes per hour throughout the whole day, blood pressure and heart rate were monitored non-invasively in ambulatory conditions for 8 h (0900-1700 h). Blood pressure monitoring was repeated during a non-smoking day.

METHODS

Beat-to-beat blood pressure and heart rate were monitored at rest by means of the Finapres device. Blood pressure signal was sampled at 165 Hz by a computer to calculate hourly data. Ambulatory blood pressure and heart rate were measured once every 10 min.

RESULTS

In resting conditions, the first cigarette caused an immediate and marked increase in blood pressure and heart rate, and the peak blood pressure and heart rate achieved were similar for the remaining three cigarettes. In each instance, the hemodynamic effects were so prolonged that throughout the smoking hour, blood pressure and heart rate were persistently higher than during the non-smoking hour. The standard deviations of systolic and diastolic blood pressure and heart rate were also higher during the smoking hour, indicating an increase in blood pressure and heart rate variability. In the six ambulant smokers, daytime blood pressure and heart rate were also persistently higher during smoking than during non-smoking.

CONCLUSIONS

Heavy smoking is associated with a persistent rise in blood pressure and also with an increase in blood pressure variability. These effects (which may escape clinic blood pressure measurements performed during non-smoking) may account for some of the smoking-related cardiovascular risk.

Testing the accuracy of blood pressure monitoring devices in ambulatory conditions

In recent years technological progress has improved the construction of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring devices. This has resulted in devices able to measure blood pressure continuously and non-invasively, and also in lighter, less noisy and more accurate intermittent blood pressure monitors. The accuracy of monitors, however, is still tested by taking blood pressure measurements at rest, and testing against intra-arterial blood pressure values, in true ambulatory conditions, is very seldom used. When evaluated by the latter approach, devices such as SpaceLabs 5300 and the Sandoz SPS 1558 recorders can be substantially inaccurate. Newer devices such as the SpaceLabs 90202 and 90207 are also somewhat inaccurate, particularly when diastolic blood pressure is considered. However, hour-to-hour changes in blood pressure obtained by the SpaceLabs 90202 and 90207 monitors are qualitatively and quantitatively similar to those obtained by invasive methods. This makes it possible to describe the 24-h blood pressure profile more accurately.

Effect of stress on diagnosis of hypertension

Blood pressure assessment by a physician elicits an alerting reaction and a pressor response in the patient. The magnitude and time course of this response are described for a large number of hypertensive subjects in whom the assessments were performed during ambulatory intra-arterial blood pressure monitoring. In nearly all of the subjects, the physician's visit was accompanied by blood pressure and heart rate increases that peaked within 4 minutes and then declined. The response was characterized by a relatively high average value; a large between-subject variability; no relation with patient age, baseline hemodynamic values, and responses to laboratory stressors; and no attenuation with multiple repetition of the physician's visit. On the other hand, the increase in blood pressure was considerably less when blood pressure assessment was made by a nurse than when it was made by a physician; in both instances, a 10-minute wait was associated with marked reduction of the initial response. Thus, the stress inherent in usual blood pressure-measuring procedures is responsible for considerable overestimations of patients' blood pressures. There are means by which this can be minimized, although a residual error is likely to remain in most subjects. Whether the stress-devoid blood pressure is a better prognostic index than the stress-related one remains unknown.

24-Hour Blood Pressure Monitoring in Hypertension

It has been recognized for some time that blood pressure is highly variable over a 24-h period. A number of studies have demonstrated that the extent and severity of target-organ damage associated with hypertension can be correlated more closely with blood pressure values monitored continuously for 24 h than with individual values recorded sphygmomanometrically. A great deal of interest is focused on whether absolute values of diastolic or systolic blood pressure, values during the day or night, or the rate of change of blood pressure such as the rapid increase that occurs in the early morning are more or less important factors contributing to the mortality and morbidity associated with hypertension. Work from our own unit provides evidence of the importance of two features in the variability of blood pressure. Blood pressure decreases during the night, but remains higher in hypertensive patients than in normotensive subjects. The mean nighttime blood pressure was shown to correlate with hypertension-related target-organ damage almost as closely as the mean daytime blood pressure. Using 24-h blood pressure monitoring, we have shown that the higher the mean 24-h blood pressure, the greater the extent and severity of target-organ involvement. In addition, for patients with comparable mean 24-h blood pressure values, larger degrees of blood pressure variability throughout the monitoring period were associated with more target-organ damage. Taking the available evidence into account, it is probably important that treatments used for hypertension should provide control of blood pressure for a full 24-h period confirmed by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring.

Cardiovascular effects of smoking

Coronary heart disease (CHD) increases with smoking and this factor interacts with hypercholesterolemia and hypertension in raising the incidence of this condition in a greater than linear fashion. This can be explained by the adverse effect of smoking on plasma fibrogen, platelet turnover and lipid profile. It may also be accounted for, however, by the acute bradycardia, increase in blood pressure and generalized vasoconstriction accompanying smoking, due to a nicotine-dependent activation of the sympathetic nervous system. These effects (which in heavy smokers can raise blood pressure permanently) are only partly offset by beta-blockers and can only be abolished by opposing the cardiac and vascular sympathetic influences by alpha and beta-blockade combined.

Early twenty-four-hour blood pressure elevation in subjects with parental hypertension

We studied 15 normotensive offspring of hypertensive parents, comparing them with 15 normotensive controls matched for sex, body mass index and age. In the offspring, both parents were hypertensive, while in the controls, neither parent was hypertensive. Blood pressure was measured at rest, during a variety of laboratory stressors (mental arithmetic, mirror drawing test, hand grip and cold pressor test), and was also monitored for 24 h in ambulatory conditions (Spacelabs 5300 M, Richmond, Washington, USA). Resting mean and diastolic blood pressures were higher (P less than 0.05) in the subjects with parental hypertension than in those without. The mean blood pressure rise induced by the laboratory stressors was not significantly greater at any time in the subjects with hypertensive parents compared with controls. Twenty-four-hour systolic and mean blood pressures, however, were significantly higher (P less than 0.05) in the subjects with hypertensive parents than in the controls. Thus the higher office blood pressure shown in the prehypertensive stage by subjects with parental hypertension is not due to hypersensitivity to stress, but represents an early and permanent blood pressure elevation.

Comparison of finger and intra-arterial blood pressure monitoring at rest and during laboratory testing

The accuracy of blood pressure values obtained by continuous noninvasive finger blood pressure recording via the FINAPRES device was evaluated by comparison with simultaneous intraarterial monitoring both at rest and during performance of tests known to induce fast and often marked changes in blood pressure. The comparison was performed in 24 normotensive or essential hypertensive subjects. The average discrepancy between finger and intra-arterial blood pressure recorded over a 30-minute rest period was 6.5 +/- 2.6 mm Hg and 5.4 +/- 2.9 mm Hg for systolic and diastolic blood pressure, respectively; a close between-method correspondence was also demonstrated by linear regression analysis. The beat-to-beat changes in finger systolic and diastolic blood pressure were on average similar to those measured intra-arterially during tests that induced a pressor or depressor response (hand-grip, cold pressor test, diving test, Valsalva maneuver, intravenous injections of phenylephrine and trinitroglycerine) as well as during tests that caused vasomotor changes without major variations in blood pressure (application of lower body negative pressure, passive leg raising). The average between-method discrepancy in the evaluation of blood pressure changes was never greater than 4.3 and 2.0 mm Hg for systolic and diastolic blood pressure, respectively; the corresponding standard deviations ranged between 4.6 and 1.6 mm Hg. Beat-to-beat computer analysis of blood pressure variability over the 30-minute rest period provided standard deviations almost identical when calculated by separate consideration of intra-arterial and finger blood pressure tracings (3.7 and 3.8 mm Hg, respectively).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Twenty-four hour ambulatory intra-arterial blood pressure in normotensive and borderline hypertensive subjects

A number of studies have shown that blood pressure values obtained by ambulatory monitoring are lower than those obtained in the doctor's office by cuff readings. However, there is still no suitable information on 'normal' 24-h ambulatory blood pressure values. In 19 normotensive and 13 borderline hypertensive subjects, defined by repeated office blood pressure measurements, we recorded intra-arterial blood pressure under ambulatory conditions for 24 h (Oxford method) in order (1) to assess the 24-h blood pressure values of normal subjects, and (2) to compare their 24-h blood pressure values with those of borderline hypertensive patients. In the normotensive subjects systolic, diastolic and mean ambulatory blood pressure values over 24 h were significantly lower than the corresponding office values, the differences being -15.0, -22.1 and -17.9 mmHg, respectively. In the borderline hypertensives 24-h ambulatory blood pressure was significantly lower than office readings. On average, the 24-h mean blood pressure of normotensive subjects was significantly lower than that of borderline patients (P less than 0.01). However, individual 24-h blood pressure values showed a considerable overlap. Thus, (1) ambulatory blood pressure values just below 140/90 mmHg do not necessarily mean that the blood pressure is in the normal range, the mean 24-h blood pressure of true normotensive subjects being much lower; (2) ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in patients with high office blood pressure readings may help to identify subjects whose 24-h mean values are indistinguishable from those of normotensives. However, the clinical relevance of these findings in the diagnosis of hypertension has to be validated by prospective clinical trials.

24-hour blood pressure monitoring: evaluation of Spacelabs 5300 monitor by comparison with intra-arterial blood pressure recording in ambulant subjects

The accuracy of 24-h blood pressure values obtained by ambulatory monitoring via the Spacelabs 5300 device was evaluated by comparison with simultaneous 24-h intra-arterial blood pressure recording from the contralateral arm. The comparison was made in eight essential hypertensive subjects in whom non-invasive blood pressure was measured every 15 (day) or 30 min (night). The measurements were automatically and visually edited to eliminate artefactual readings and hourly and 24-h means were calculated separately for systolic and diastolic blood pressure. The corresponding intra-arterial blood pressure means were also calculated. In the group as a whole, hourly means obtained by the non-invasive device were similar or only slightly different from those recorded intra-arterially. The 24-h systolic blood pressure mean obtained non-invasively was not significantly different from that obtained intra-arterially (138.4 +/- 9.1 and 142.9 +/- 9.2 mmHg, respectively), nor were the corresponding 24-h diastolic blood pressure means significantly different (83.5 +/- 4.5 and 80.6 +/- 3.5 mmHg, respectively). However, in spite of these similarities, there were contrasting and often large discrepancies between non-invasive and intra-arterial values in individual subjects. For the 24-h systolic blood pressure mean the discrepancies ranged from 7.6 +/- 1.1 to 16.1 +/- 2.2 mmHg and for the 24-h diastolic blood pressure mean, from 3.5 to 13.2 mmHg. Thus, the Spacelabs 5300 device has a limited ability to correctly estimate ambulatory blood pressure in individual subjects. It may be better suited for the estimation of group blood pressures, but only because errors are smoothed by the summation of individual errors of opposing signs.

Evaluation of the baroreceptor-heart rate reflex by 24-hour intra-arterial blood pressure monitoring in humans

The baroreceptor control of the sinus node was evaluated in 10 normotensive and 10 age-matched essential hypertensive subjects in whom ambulatory blood pressure was recorded intra-arterially for 24 hours and scanned by a computer to identify the sequences of three or more consecutive beats in which systolic blood pressure (SBP) and pulse interval (PI) progressively rose (+PI/+SBP) or fell (-PI/-SBP) in a linear fashion, according to a method validated in cats. In normotensive subjects, several hundred +PI/+SBP and -PI/-SBP sequences of 3 beats were found whereas the number of sequences of 4, 5, and more than 5 beats showed a progressive drastic reduction. The mean slopes of +PI/+SBP (7.6 +/- 2.0 msec/mm Hg) and -PI/-SBP (6.4 +/- 1.5 msec/mm Hg) sequences were similar, but in both instances there was a large scattering of the values around the mean (variation coefficients: 64.2 +/- 4.7 and 62.6 +/- 2.4%). The slopes decreased as a function of the sequence length and baseline heart rate and increased to a marked extent during the night as compared with daytime values. All sequences were more rare (-33.2% for +PI/+SBP and -31.7% for -PI/-SBP) and less steep in hypertensive subjects (-40.3 and -36.2%, respectively), who failed to show the marked nighttime increase in slope observed in normotensive subjects. To our knowledge, these observations provide the first description in humans of the baroreceptor-heart rate reflex in daily life. This reflex is characterized by marked within-subject variations in sensitivity due in part to hemodynamic, temporal, and behavioral factors.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Comparison of the cardiovascular effects of different laboratory stressors and their relationship with blood pressure variability

Laboratory stressors are employed to assess the 'typical' cardiovascular reactivity to stress of a given subject. It is believed that this may assist in the diagnosis of hypertension and predict future development of blood pressure (BP) elevation. However, the internal consistency of the data obtained by laboratory stressing manoeuvres and their ability to reflect the effects of everyday stressful events occurring over a 24-h period have never been clearly established. We studied a group of ambulant normotensive and essential hypertensive in-patients who were undergoing prolonged intra-arterial blood pressure monitoring (Oxford method) to determine firstly, whether four routine laboratory stressors provided a homogeneous evaluation of subjects' reactivity and secondly, whether cardiovascular reactivity to these stressors reflected a tendency of BP to vary over a 24-h period. A significant correlation (P less than 0.01) was found between the pressor responses to mental arithmetic and the mirror drawing test and between the pressor responses to the cold pressor test and hand-grip. These correlations, however, were not close and responses to the 'mental' and 'physical' stressors were unrelated. The elevation in BP induced by laboratory stressors also did not correlate with the increase in BP accompanying stress elicited outside laboratory conditions (i.e. doctor's visit). The pressor effects of both the laboratory and the out-of-laboratory stressors showed little or no correlation with the 24-h absolute or per cent blood pressure variabilities, although for the stressors involving a mental challenge, a significant though not close correlation with daytime blood pressure variability was found. These data underline the limitations of laboratory tests in assessing cardiovascular reactivity to stress.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Neural control of circulation before and after intravenous urapidil in essential hypertension

Drugs interfering with sympathetic influences on the cardiovascular system have been shown to effectively lower blood pressure in hypertension. However, sympathetic cardiovascular control is involved in blood pressure homeostasis, which means that these drugs may produce potential adverse haemodynamic effects that may reduce the benefit of their antihypertensive action. This paper summarises the results of a study in which we examined the effects of urapidil on the arterial baroreflex and the cardiopulmonary reflex in 6 essential hypertensive patients given 25 mg of the drug intravenously. The dose of the drug used caused a marked reduction in arterial blood pressure (direct measurement). However, pressor and depressor responses to carotid baroreceptor deactivation and stimulation (neck chamber device), respectively, were not modified when compared with those observed in the placebo period. This was also the case for increases and reductions in both forearm vascular resistance and plasma noradrenaline (norepinephrine) concentrations induced by deactivating and stimulating cardiopulmonary receptors, respectively. The pressor and tachycardic responses to handgrip and cold exposure were also unaffected by the drug. It is concluded that when administered at a clinically effective dose urapidil does not adversely affect major reflex mechanisms involved in neural cardiovascular regulation. This has favourable implications for the use of the drug in clinical practice.

Calcium antagonists and neural control of circulation in essential hypertension

Data from animals and from man suggest that calcium antagonists interfere with alpha-adrenergic receptors and that this mechanism may be responsible for some of the vasodilation induced by these drugs. However, alpha-adrenergic receptors play a primary role in baroreceptor regulation of the cardiovascular system and blood pressure homeostasis, which might therefore be adversely affected by calcium antagonist treatment. We addressed this question in 14 essential hypertensives studied before treatment, 1 h after 20 mg oral nitrendipine and 5-7 days after daily administration of 20 mg oral nitrendipine. Blood pressure was measured by an intra-arterial catheter, heart rate by an electrocardiogram, cardiac output by thermodilution and forearm blood flow by venous occlusion plethysmography. Total peripheral and forearm vascular resistances were calculated by dividing mean blood pressure by blood flow values. Plasma norepinephrine was also measured (high performance liquid chromatography) in blood taken from the right atrium. Compared with the pretreatment values, acute nitrendipine administration caused a fall in resting blood pressure, an increase in the resting heart rate and cardiac output, and a fall in resting peripheral and forearm vascular resistance. The resting hypotension and vasodilation were also evident during the prolonged nitrendipine administration, which was, however, accompanied by much less resting cardiac stimulation than that observed in the acute condition. Baroreceptor control of the heart rate (vasoactive drug method) was similar before and after acute and prolonged nitrendipine treatment. This was also the case for carotid baroreceptor control of blood pressure (neck chamber technique) and for control of forearm vascular resistance as exerted by receptors in the cardiopulmonary region (lower-body negative-pressure and passive leg-raising techniques).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Role of heart rate variability in the production of blood pressure variability in man

In both normotensive and hypertensive subjects blood pressure (BP) and heart rate (HR) show concordant changes over 24 h. This may depend on a central factor exerting influences of the same nature on cardiac and vascular targets. An alternative explanation, however, is that a cause-effect relationship links these variabilities, i.e. that HR variations induce BP changes [presumably via variations in cardiac output (CO)]. Blood pressure was recorded intra-arterially in five supine and five exercising (walking) essential hypertensive subjects during a control period of 1 h and during an additional hour in which atropine, 0.04 mg/kg body weight, was injected intravenously (i.v.). The same recordings were performed in seven other subjects, in which saline rather than atropine was employed. One-hour BP and HR variabilities (variation coefficients, VC) were computer analysed. In both the supine and the exercising subjects atropine caused a marked reduction in HR VC (-65.3 and -48.4%, respectively). In the supine subjects this reduction was accompanied by only a modest reduction in BP VC whereas in the exercising subjects the BP VC increased by 30.4%. In the seven subjects in which saline was injected no change in BP and HR VC occurred. Thus a marked reduction in HR variability is not accompanied by a comparable attenuation in BP variability, which rules out a cause-effect link between these two phenomena. Indeed, during physical exercise HR stabilization is followed by an increase rather than a reduction in BP variation, which supports the conclusion that under some circumstances HR plays an anti-oscillatory role.

Doctor-elicited blood pressure rises at the time of sphygmomanometric blood pressure assessment persist over repeated visits

Blood pressure assessment by a doctor triggers an alerting reaction which may raise patients' blood pressure to a marked degree. Because this may lead to an overestimation of the prevalence of hypertension, it is important to determine whether attenuation of this blood pressure rise occurs with repetition of the doctor's visit. In 16 ambulant inpatients with mild essential hypertension, blood pressure was recorded intra-arterially for 2 days, using the Oxford method. During the recording the patients had four 10-min visits during which blood pressure was repeatedly measured by a sphygmomanometer. The visits to each patient were made by a doctor who had never seen him or her before and were regularly distributed over the total daytime available. In nearly all patients intra-arterial blood pressure and heart rate were elevated throughout the 10 min of each visit, with a peak during the first 4 min and a subsequent decline. The peak mean blood pressure rises were 22.6 +/- 1.8, 20.3 +/- 2.4, 19.3 +/- 2.4 and 21.4 +/- 3.1 mmHg (means +/- s.e.m.) in the four visits. Respective peak heart rate rises were 17.7 +/- 1.7, 20.7 +/- 2.4, 19.8 +/- 2.2 and 17.0 +/- 1.9 beats/min. The reduced pressor and tachycardic responses observed at the 10th min of the visit were also similar in the four visits (blood pressure: 19, 15, 28 and 24% of the peak response; heart rate 21, 13, 24 and 9% of the peak response, respectively). These findings show that the blood pressure rise often accompanying sphygmomanometric blood pressure assessment by the doctor persists after several visits spaced at close time intervals.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)