1
|
Mohamed ME, Saqr A, Staley C, Onyeaghala G, Teigen L, Dorr CR, Remmel RP, Guan W, Oetting WS, Matas AJ, Israni AK, Jacobson PA. Pharmacomicrobiomics: Immunosuppressive Drugs and Microbiome Interactions in Transplantation. Transplantation 2024:00007890-990000000-00663. [PMID: 38361239 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000004926] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/17/2024]
Abstract
The human microbiome is associated with human health and disease. Exogenous compounds, including pharmaceutical products, are also known to be affected by the microbiome, and this discovery has led to the field of pharmacomicobiomics. The microbiome can also alter drug pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, possibly resulting in side effects, toxicities, and unanticipated disease response. Microbiome-mediated effects are referred to as drug-microbiome interactions (DMI). Rapid advances in the field of pharmacomicrobiomics have been driven by the availability of efficient bacterial genome sequencing methods and new computational and bioinformatics tools. The success of fecal microbiota transplantation for recurrent Clostridioides difficile has fueled enthusiasm and research in the field. This review focuses on the pharmacomicrobiome in transplantation. Alterations in the microbiome in transplant recipients are well documented, largely because of prophylactic antibiotic use, and the potential for DMI is high. There is evidence that the gut microbiome may alter the pharmacokinetic disposition of tacrolimus and result in microbiome-specific tacrolimus metabolites. The gut microbiome also impacts the enterohepatic recirculation of mycophenolate, resulting in substantial changes in pharmacokinetic disposition and systemic exposure. The mechanisms of these DMI and the specific bacteria or communities of bacteria are under investigation. There are little or no human DMI data for cyclosporine A, corticosteroids, and sirolimus. The available evidence in transplantation is limited and driven by small studies of heterogeneous designs. Larger clinical studies are needed, but the potential for future clinical application of the pharmacomicrobiome in avoiding poor outcomes is high.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Moataz E Mohamed
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology, College of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
| | - Abdelrahman Saqr
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology, College of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
| | | | - Guillaume Onyeaghala
- Hennepin Healthcare Research Institute, Minneapolis, MN
- Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
| | - Levi Teigen
- Department of Food Science and Nutrition, University of Minnesota, St Paul, MN
| | - Casey R Dorr
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology, College of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
- Hennepin Healthcare Research Institute, Minneapolis, MN
- Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
- Department of Medicine, Hennepin Healthcare, Minneapolis, MN
| | - Rory P Remmel
- Department of Medicinal Chemistry, College of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
| | - Weihua Guan
- Division of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
| | - William S Oetting
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology, College of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
| | - Arthur J Matas
- Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
| | - Ajay K Israni
- Hennepin Healthcare Research Institute, Minneapolis, MN
- Department of Medicine, Hennepin Healthcare, Minneapolis, MN
- Department of Epidemiology and Community Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
| | - Pamala A Jacobson
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology, College of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Maradit Kremers H, Grossardt BR, Miller AR, Kasiske BL, Matas AJ, Khosla S, Kremers WK, Amer H, Kumar R. Fracture Risk Among Living Kidney Donors 25 Years After Donation. JAMA Netw Open 2024; 7:e2353005. [PMID: 38265798 PMCID: PMC10809017 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.53005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2023] [Accepted: 12/03/2023] [Indexed: 01/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Importance Living kidney donors may have an increased risk of fractures due to reductions in kidney mass, lower concentrations of serum 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D, and secondary increases in serum parathyroid hormone. Objective To compare the overall and site-specific risk of fractures among living kidney donors with strictly matched controls from the general population who would have been eligible to donate a kidney but did not do so. Design, Setting, and Participants This survey study was conducted between December 1, 2021, and July 31, 2023. A total of 5065 living kidney donors from 3 large transplant centers in Minnesota were invited to complete a survey about their bone health and history of fractures, and 16 156 population-based nondonor controls without a history of comorbidities that would have precluded kidney donation were identified from the Rochester Epidemiology Project and completed the same survey. A total of 2132 living kidney donors and 2014 nondonor controls responded to the survey. Statistical analyses were performed from May to August 2023. Exposure Living kidney donation. Main Outcomes and Measures The rates of overall and site-specific fractures were compared between living kidney donors and controls using standardized incidence ratios (SIRs). Results At the time of survey, the 2132 living kidney donors had a mean (SD) age of 67.1 (8.9) years and included 1245 women (58.4%), and the 2014 controls had a mean (SD) age of 68.6 (7.9) years and included 1140 women (56.6%). The mean (SD) time between donation or index date and survey date was 24.2 (10.4) years for donors and 27.6 (10.7) years for controls. The overall rate of fractures among living kidney donors was significantly lower than among controls (SIR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.81-0.97). However, there were significantly more vertebral fractures among living kidney donors than among controls (SIR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.05-1.83). Conclusions and Relevance This survey study found a reduced rate of overall fractures but an excess of vertebral fractures among living kidney donors compared with controls after a mean follow-up of 25 years. Treatment of excess vertebral fractures with dietary supplements such as vitamin D3 may reduce the numbers of vertebral fractures and patient morbidity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hilal Maradit Kremers
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
- Department of Orthopedics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Brandon R. Grossardt
- Division of Clinical Trials and Biostatistics, Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Adam R. Miller
- William J. von Liebig Center for Transplantation and Clinical Regeneration, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Bertram L. Kasiske
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Hennepin County Medical Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Arthur J. Matas
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis
| | - Sundeep Khosla
- Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Department of Medicine and Kogod Center on Aging, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
- Department of Physiology and Biomedical Engineering, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Walter K. Kremers
- Division of Clinical Trials and Biostatistics, Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Hatem Amer
- William J. von Liebig Center for Transplantation and Clinical Regeneration, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Nephrology Research Unit, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Rajiv Kumar
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Nephrology Research Unit, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lyden GR, Vock DM, Helgeson ES, Finger EB, Matas AJ, Snyder JJ. Transportability of causal inference under random dynamic treatment regimes for kidney-pancreas transplantation. Biometrics 2023; 79:3165-3178. [PMID: 37431172 DOI: 10.1111/biom.13899] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2022] [Accepted: 06/14/2023] [Indexed: 07/12/2023]
Abstract
A difficult decision for patients in need of kidney-pancreas transplant is whether to seek a living kidney donor or wait to receive both organs from one deceased donor. The framework of dynamic treatment regimes (DTRs) can inform this choice, but a patient-relevant strategy such as "wait for deceased-donor transplant" is ill-defined because there are multiple versions of treatment (i.e., wait times, organ qualities). Existing DTR methods average over the distribution of treatment versions in the data, estimating survival under a "representative intervention." This is undesirable if transporting inferences to a target population such as patients today, who experience shorter wait times thanks to evolutions in allocation policy. We, therefore, propose the concept of a generalized representative intervention (GRI): a random DTR that assigns treatment version by drawing from the distribution among strategy compliers in the target population (e.g., patients today). We describe an inverse-probability-weighted product-limit estimator of survival under a GRI that performs well in simulations and can be implemented in standard statistical software. For continuous treatments (e.g., organ quality), weights are reformulated to depend on probabilities only, not densities. We apply our method to a national database of kidney-pancreas transplant candidates from 2001-2020 to illustrate that variability in transplant rate across years and centers results in qualitative differences in the optimal strategy for patient survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Grace R Lyden
- Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, Hennepin Healthcare Research Institute, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
- Division of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - David M Vock
- Division of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Erika S Helgeson
- Division of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Erik B Finger
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Arthur J Matas
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Jon J Snyder
- Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, Hennepin Healthcare Research Institute, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
- Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
- Division of Epidemiology & Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Peters TG, Fung JJ, Radcliffe-Richards J, Satel S, Roth AE, McCormick F, Gershun M, Matas AJ, Roberts JP, Morrison J, Chertow GM, Lee LD, Held PJ, Ojo A. Report From a Multidisciplinary Symposium on the Future of Living Kidney Donor Transplantation. Prog Transplant 2023; 33:363-371. [PMID: 37968881 DOI: 10.1177/15269248231212911] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2023]
Abstract
Virtually all clinicians agree that living donor renal transplantation is the optimal treatment for permanent loss of kidney function. Yet, living donor kidney transplantation has not grown in the United States for more than 2 decades. A virtual symposium gathered experts to examine this shortcoming and to stimulate and clarify issues salient to improving living donation. The ethical principles of rewarding kidney donors and the limits of altruism as the exclusive compelling stimulus for donation were emphasized. Concepts that donor incentives could save up to 40 000 lives annually and considerable taxpayer dollars were examined, and survey data confirmed voter support for donor compensation. Objections to rewarding donors were also presented. Living donor kidney exchanges and limited numbers of deceased donor kidneys were reviewed. Discussants found consensus that attempts to increase living donation should include removing artificial barriers in donor evaluation, expansion of living donor chains, affirming the safety of live kidney donation, and assurance that donors incur no expense. If the current legal and practice standards persist, living kidney donation will fail to achieve its true potential to save lives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas G Peters
- Department of Surgery, University of Florida, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - John J Fung
- University of Chicago Transplant Institute, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | - Sally Satel
- American Enterprise Institute, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Alvin E Roth
- Nobel Laurette in Economics, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - Frank McCormick
- Department of Economics, Bank of America (retired), Walnut Creek, CA, USA
| | | | - Arthur J Matas
- Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - John P Roberts
- Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | - Glenn M Chertow
- Division of Nephrology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | | | - Philip J Held
- Division of Nephrology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - Akinlolu Ojo
- School of Medicine, University of Kansas, Kansas City, KS, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Matas AJ, Montgomery RA, Schold JD. The Organ Shortage Continues to Be a Crisis for Patients With End-stage Kidney Disease. JAMA Surg 2023; 158:787-788. [PMID: 37223921 DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2023.0526] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/25/2023]
Abstract
This Viewpoint describes the organ shortage for patients with end-stage kidney disease despite increases in kidney donations between 2000 and 2021.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arthur J Matas
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis
| | | | - Jesse D Schold
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Kidney donors have increased risk of postdonation gestational hypertension (gHTN) and preeclampsia. In the general population, pregnancy complications are associated with long-term maternal risk. However, little data exist on whether donors with postdonation pregnancy-related complications have similar increased long-term risks. We studied whether postdonation gHTN, preeclampsia/eclampsia, or gestational diabetes (gDM) was associated with increased risk of developing hypertension, DM, cardiovascular disease, or estimated glomerular filtration rate <45 mL/min/1.73 m 2 . METHODS Postdonation pregnancies with complications were matched to pregnancies without complications based on time from donation. Incidence of outcomes was compared using sequential Cox regression with robust standard errors. Donors with predonation pregnancy complications were excluded. Models were adjusted for age at pregnancy, gravidity, year of donation, and family history of hypertension, DM, and heart disease. RESULTS Of the 384 donors with postdonation pregnancies (median [quartiles] follow-up of 27.0 [14.2-36.2] y after donation), 39 experienced preeclampsia/eclampsia, 29 gHTN without preeclampsia, and 17 gDM. Median interval from donation to first pregnancy with preeclampsia was 5.1 (2.9-8.6) y; for gHTN, 3.7 (1.9-7.8) y; and for gDM, 7.3 (3.7-10.3) y. Preeclampsia/eclampsia (hazard ratio [HR] 2.70; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.53-4.77) and gHTN (HR 2.39; 95% CI, 1.24-4.60) were associated with development of hypertension. Preeclampsia/eclampsia (HR 2.15; 95% CI, 1.11-4.16) and gDM (HR 5.60; 95% CI, 1.41-22.15) were associated with development of DM. Pregnancy-related complications were not associated with increased risk of cardiovascular disease or estimated glomerular filtration rate <45 mL/min/1.73 m 2 . CONCLUSIONS In our single-center study, postdonation preeclampsia, gHTN, or gDM was associated with long-term risk of hypertension or DM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elise F. Palzer
- Division of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
| | - Erika S. Helgeson
- Division of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
| | - Michael D. Evans
- Clinical and Translational Science Institute, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
| | - David M. Vock
- Division of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
| | - Arthur J. Matas
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Helgeson ES, Vempati S, Palzer EF, Mjoen G, Haugen AJ, Matas AJ. Development and Validation of a Hypertension Risk Calculator for Living Kidney Donors. Transplantation 2023; 107:1373-1379. [PMID: 36727726 PMCID: PMC10205650 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000004505] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ideally, when deciding whether to donate, kidney donor candidates would understand their long-term risks. Using single-center data (N = 4055; median [quartiles] follow-up: 18 [9-28] y), we developed a calculator for postdonation hypertension and validated it using long-term data from an external single-center cohort (N = 1189, median [quartiles] follow-up: 9 [5-17] y). METHODS Risk factors considered were routinely obtained at evaluation from donor candidates. Two modeling approaches were evaluated: Cox proportional hazards and random survival forest models. Cross-validation prediction error and Harrell's concordance-index were used to compare accuracy for model development. Top-performing models were assessed in the validation cohort using the concordance-index and net reclassification improvement. RESULTS In the development cohort, 34% reported hypertension at a median (quartiles) of 16 (8-24) y postdonation; and in the validation cohort, 29% reported hypertension after 17 (10-22) y postdonation. The most accurate model was a Cox proportional hazards model with age, sex, race, estimated glomerular filtration rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, body mass index, glucose, smoking history, family history of hypertension, relationship with recipient, and hyperlipidemia (concordance-index, 0.72 in the development cohort and 0.82 in the validation cohort). CONCLUSIONS A postdonation hypertension calculator was developed and validated; it provides kidney donor candidates, their family, and care team a long-term projection of hypertension risk that can be incorporated into the informed consent process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erika S. Helgeson
- Division of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
| | - Shruti Vempati
- Division of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
| | - Elise F. Palzer
- Division of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
| | - Geir Mjoen
- Department of Transplant Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo Norway
| | - Anders J. Haugen
- Deptartment of Internal Medicine, Bærum Hospital, Sandvika Norway
| | - Arthur J. Matas
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Raynaud M, Al-Awadhi S, Juric I, Divard G, Lombardi Y, Basic-Jukic N, Aubert O, Dubourg L, Masson I, Mariat C, Prié D, Pernin V, Le Quintrec M, Larson TS, Stegall MD, Bikbov B, Ruggenenti P, Mesnard L, Ibrahim HN, Nielsen MB, Matas AJ, Nankivell BJ, Benjamens S, Pol RA, Bakker SJL, Jouven X, Legendre C, Kamar N, Smith BH, Wadei HM, Durrbach A, Vincenti F, Remuzzi G, Lefaucheur C, Bentall AJ, Loupy A. Race-free estimated glomerular filtration rate equation in kidney transplant recipients: development and validation study. BMJ 2023; 381:e073654. [PMID: 37257905 PMCID: PMC10231444 DOI: 10.1136/bmj-2022-073654] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/17/2023] [Indexed: 06/02/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare the performance of a newly developed race-free kidney recipient specific glomerular filtration rate (GFR) equation with the three current main equations for measuring GFR in kidney transplant recipients. DESIGN Development and validation study SETTING: 17 cohorts in Europe, the United States, and Australia (14 transplant centres, three clinical trials). PARTICIPANTS 15 489 adults (3622 in development cohort (Necker, Saint Louis, and Toulouse hospitals, France), 11 867 in multiple external validation cohorts) who received kidney transplants between 1 January 2000 and 1 January 2021. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE The main outcome measure was GFR, measured according to local practice. Performance of the GFR equations was assessed using P30 (proportion of estimated GFR (eGFR) within 30% of measured GFR (mGFR)) and correct classification (agreement between eGFR and mGFR according to GFR stages). The race-free equation, based on creatinine level, age, and sex, was developed using additive and multiplicative linear regressions, and its performance was compared with the three current main GFR equations: Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) equation, Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) 2009 equation, and race-free CKD-EPI 2021 equation. RESULTS The study included 15 489 participants, with 50 464 mGFR and eGFR values. The mean GFR was 53.18 mL/min/1.73m2 (SD 17.23) in the development cohort and 55.90 mL/min/1.73m2 (19.69) in the external validation cohorts. Among the current GFR equations, the race-free CKD-EPI 2021 equation showed the lowest performance compared with the MDRD and CKD-EPI 2009 equations. When race was included in the kidney recipient specific GFR equation, performance did not increase. The race-free kidney recipient specific GFR equation showed significantly improved performance compared with the race-free CKD-EPI 2021 equation and performed well in the external validation cohorts (P30 ranging from 73.0% to 91.3%). The race-free kidney recipient specific GFR equation performed well in several subpopulations of kidney transplant recipients stratified by race (P30 73.0-91.3%), sex (72.7-91.4%), age (70.3-92.0%), body mass index (64.5-100%), donor type (58.5-92.9%), donor age (68.3-94.3%), treatment (78.5-85.2%), creatinine level (72.8-91.3%), GFR measurement method (73.0-91.3%), and timing of GFR measurement post-transplant (72.9-95.5%). An online application was developed that estimates GFR based on recipient's creatinine level, age, and sex (https://transplant-prediction-system.shinyapps.io/eGFR_equation_KTX/). CONCLUSION A new race-free kidney recipient specific GFR equation was developed and validated using multiple, large, international cohorts of kidney transplant recipients. The equation showed high accuracy and outperformed the race-free CKD-EPI 2021 equation that was developed in individuals with native kidneys. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05229939.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marc Raynaud
- Université de Paris Cité, INSERM, PARCC, Paris Translational Research Centre for Organ Transplantation, F-75015 Paris, France
| | - Solaf Al-Awadhi
- Université de Paris Cité, INSERM, PARCC, Paris Translational Research Centre for Organ Transplantation, F-75015 Paris, France
| | - Ivana Juric
- Department of Nephrology, Arterial Hypertension, Dialysis and Transplantation, University Hospital Centre Zagreb, School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Gillian Divard
- Université de Paris Cité, INSERM, PARCC, Paris Translational Research Centre for Organ Transplantation, F-75015 Paris, France
| | - Yannis Lombardi
- Department of Nephrology and Acute Kidney Intensive Care, Tenon Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Nikolina Basic-Jukic
- Department of Nephrology, Arterial Hypertension, Dialysis and Transplantation, University Hospital Centre Zagreb, School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Olivier Aubert
- Université de Paris Cité, INSERM, PARCC, Paris Translational Research Centre for Organ Transplantation, F-75015 Paris, France
- Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, Necker Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Laurence Dubourg
- Centre de Référence des Maladies Rénales Rares, Service de Néphrologie et Rhumatologie Pédiatriques, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Ingrid Masson
- Department of Nephrology, Dialysis and Renal Transplantation, Nord Hospital, Jean Monnet University, Saint-Etienne, France
| | - Christophe Mariat
- Department of Nephrology, Dialysis and Renal Transplantation, Nord Hospital, Jean Monnet University, Saint-Etienne, France
| | - Dominique Prié
- Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, Necker Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Vincent Pernin
- Department of Nephrology, University Hospital Centre, Montpellier, France
| | - Moglie Le Quintrec
- Department of Nephrology, University Hospital Centre, Montpellier, France
| | - Timothy S Larson
- William J von Liebig Centre for Transplantation and Clinical Regeneration, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Mark D Stegall
- William J von Liebig Centre for Transplantation and Clinical Regeneration, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Boris Bikbov
- Department of Health Policy, Instituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Piero Ruggenenti
- Department of Renal Medicine, Clinical Research Centre for Rare Diseases "Aldo e Cele Daccò": Instituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Ranica, Bergamo, Italy
- Unit of Nephrology and Dialysis, Azienda Socio-Sanitaria Territoriale Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Laurent Mesnard
- Department of Nephrology and Acute Kidney Intensive Care, Tenon Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Hassan N Ibrahim
- University of Texas Health Sciences Centre at Houston, Texas, USA
| | | | - Arthur J Matas
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | | | - Stan Benjamens
- Department of Surgery, University of Groningen and University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Robert A Pol
- Department of Surgery, University of Groningen and University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Stephan J L Bakker
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Groningen and University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Xavier Jouven
- Université de Paris Cité, INSERM, PARCC, Paris Translational Research Centre for Organ Transplantation, F-75015 Paris, France
| | - Christophe Legendre
- Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, Necker Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Nassim Kamar
- Department of Nephrology and Organ Transplantation, Paul Sabatier University, INSERM, Toulouse, France
| | - Byron H Smith
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Hani M Wadei
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Antoine Durrbach
- Department of Nephrology and Renal Transplantation, Henri-Mondor Hospital, Paris-Saclay University, Creteil, France
| | - Flavio Vincenti
- Department of Surgery, Kidney Transplant Service, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Giuseppe Remuzzi
- Department of Renal Medicine, Clinical Research Centre for Rare Diseases "Aldo e Cele Daccò": Instituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Ranica, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Carmen Lefaucheur
- Department of Kidney Transplantation, Saint Louis University Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Andrew J Bentall
- William J von Liebig Centre for Transplantation and Clinical Regeneration, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Alexandre Loupy
- Université de Paris Cité, INSERM, PARCC, Paris Translational Research Centre for Organ Transplantation, F-75015 Paris, France
- Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, Necker Hospital, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Vock DM, Helgeson ES, Mullan AF, Issa NS, Sanka S, Saiki AC, Mathson K, Chamberlain AM, Rule AD, Matas AJ. The Minnesota attributable risk of kidney donation (MARKD) study: a retrospective cohort study of long-term (> 50 year) outcomes after kidney donation compared to well-matched healthy controls. BMC Nephrol 2023; 24:121. [PMID: 37127560 PMCID: PMC10152793 DOI: 10.1186/s12882-023-03149-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2023] [Accepted: 04/01/2023] [Indexed: 05/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is uncertainty about the long-term risks of living kidney donation. Well-designed studies with controls well-matched on risk factors for kidney disease are needed to understand the attributable risks of kidney donation. METHODS The goal of the Minnesota Attributable Risk of Kidney Donation (MARKD) study is to compare the long-term (> 50 years) outcomes of living donors (LDs) to contemporary and geographically similar controls that are well-matched on health status. University of Minnesota (n = 4022; 1st transplant: 1963) and Mayo Clinic LDs (n = 3035; 1st transplant: 1963) will be matched to Rochester Epidemiology Project (REP) controls (approximately 4 controls to 1 donor) on the basis of age, sex, and race/ethnicity. The REP controls are a well-defined population, with detailed medical record data linked between all providers in Olmsted and surrounding counties, that come from the same geographic region and era (early 1960s to present) as the donors. Controls will be carefully selected to have health status acceptable for donation on the index date (date their matched donor donated). Further refinement of the control group will include confirmed kidney health (e.g., normal serum creatinine and/or no proteinuria) and matching (on index date) of body mass index, smoking history, family history of chronic kidney disease, and blood pressure. Outcomes will be ascertained from national registries (National Death Index and United States Renal Data System) and a new survey administered to both donors and controls; the data will be supplemented by prior surveys and medical record review of donors and REP controls. The outcomes to be compared are all-cause mortality, end-stage kidney disease, cardiovascular disease and mortality, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) trajectory and chronic kidney disease, pregnancy risks, and development of diseases that frequently lead to chronic kidney disease (e.g. hypertension, diabetes, and obesity). We will additionally evaluate whether the risk of donation differs based on baseline characteristics. DISCUSSION Our study will provide a comprehensive assessment of long-term living donor risk to inform candidate living donors, and to inform the follow-up and care of current living donors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David M Vock
- Division of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, 2221 University Ave SE, Room 200, Minneapolis, MN, 55414, USA
| | - Erika S Helgeson
- Division of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, 2221 University Ave SE, Room 200, Minneapolis, MN, 55414, USA.
| | - Aidan F Mullan
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Naim S Issa
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Sujana Sanka
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Alison C Saiki
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Kristin Mathson
- Surgery Clinical Trials Office, Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Alanna M Chamberlain
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Andrew D Rule
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Arthur J Matas
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Reininger KA, Onyeaghala G, Anderson-Haag T, Schladt DS, Wu B, Guan W, Dorr CR, Remmel RP, Mannon R, Matas AJ, Oetting WS, Stahler P, Israni AK, Jacobson PA. Higher number of tacrolimus dose adjustments in kidney transplant recipients who are extensive and intermediate CYP3A5 metabolizers. Clin Transplant 2023; 37:e14893. [PMID: 36571802 PMCID: PMC10089949 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.14893] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2022] [Accepted: 12/20/2022] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
Kidney transplant recipients carrying the CYP3A5*1 allele have lower tacrolimus troughs, and higher dose requirements compared to those with the CYP3A5*3/*3 genotype. However, data on the effect of CYP3A5 alleles on post-transplant tacrolimus management are lacking. The effect of CYP3A5 metabolism phenotypes on the number of tacrolimus dose adjustments and troughs in the first 6 months post-transplant was evaluated in 78 recipients (64% Caucasians). Time to first therapeutic concentration, percentage of time in therapeutic range (TTR), and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) were also evaluated. Fifty-five kidney transplant recipients were CYP3A5 poor metabolizers (PM), 17 were intermediate metabolizers (IM), and 6 were extensive metabolizers (EM). Compared to PMs, EMs/IMs had significantly more dose adjustments (6.1 vs. 8.1, p = .015). Overall, 33.82% of trough measurements resulted in a dose change. There was no difference in the number of tacrolimus trough measurements between PMs and EM/IMs. The total daily tacrolimus dose requirements were higher in EMs and IMs compared to PMs (<.001). TTR was ∼50% in the PMs and EMs/IMs groups. CYP3A5 EM/IM metabolizers have more tacrolimus dose changes and higher dose requirements which increases clinical management complexity. Larger studies are needed to assess the cost and benefits of including genotyping data to improve clinical management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin A Reininger
- Department of Pharmacy, Hennepin County Medical Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Guillaume Onyeaghala
- Hennepin Healthcare Research Institute, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
- Division of Nephrology, Hennepin Healthcare, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Teresa Anderson-Haag
- Department of Pharmacy, Hennepin County Medical Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - David S Schladt
- Hennepin Healthcare Research Institute, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Baolin Wu
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Weihua Guan
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Casey R Dorr
- Hennepin Healthcare Research Institute, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
- Division of Nephrology, Hennepin Healthcare, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Rory P Remmel
- Department of Medicinal Chemistry, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Roslyn Mannon
- Division of Nephrology, University of Nebraska, Omaha, Nebraska, USA
| | - Arthur J Matas
- Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - William S Oetting
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Paul Stahler
- Division of Surgery, Hennepin Healthcare, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Ajay K Israni
- Division of Nephrology, Hennepin Healthcare, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
- Department of Epidemiology and Community Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Pamala A Jacobson
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Knatterud ME, Simmons RL, Payne W, Stock P, Chavers B, Ascher N, Kaufman D, Kirk A, Keshavjee S, Humar A, Ganesh S, Hughes C, Kandaswamy R, Matas AJ. The John S. Najarian symposium: The past, present, and future of surgery and transplantation, May 20, 2022, Minneapolis, MN. Clin Transplant 2023; 37:e14877. [PMID: 36528870 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.14877] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2022] [Accepted: 11/21/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Dr John S Najarian (1927-2020), chairman of the Department of Surgery at the University of Minnesota from 1967 to 1993, was a pioneer in surgery, clinical immunology and transplantation. A Covid-delayed Festschrift was held in his honor on May 20, 2022. The speakers reflected on his myriad contributions to surgery, transplantation, and resident/fellow training, as well as current areas of ongoing research to improve clinical outcomes. Of note, Dr Najarian was a founder of the journal Clinical Transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mary E Knatterud
- Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Richard L Simmons
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - William Payne
- Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Peter Stock
- Department of Surgery, University of California - San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Blanche Chavers
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Nancy Ascher
- Department of Surgery, University of California - San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Dixon Kaufman
- Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Alan Kirk
- Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | | | - Abhinav Humar
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Swaytha Ganesh
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Christopher Hughes
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Raja Kandaswamy
- Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Arthur J Matas
- Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Semrau L, Matas AJ. A regulated system of incentives for living kidney donation: Clearing the way for an informed assessment. Am J Transplant 2022; 22:2509-2514. [PMID: 35751488 PMCID: PMC9796749 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.17129] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2022] [Revised: 06/07/2022] [Accepted: 06/19/2022] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
The kidney shortage continues to be a crisis for our patients. Despite numerous attempts to increase living and deceased donation, annually in the United States, thousands of candidates are removed from the kidney transplant waiting list because of either death or becoming too sick to transplant. To increase living donation, trials of a regulated system of incentives for living donation have been proposed. Such trials may show: (1) a significant increase in donation, and (2) that informed, incentivized donors, making an autonomous decision to donate, have the same medical and psychosocial outcomes as our conventional donors. Given the stakes, the proposal warrants careful consideration. However, to date, much discussion of the proposal has been unproductive. Objections commonly leveled against it: fail to engage with it; conflate it with underground, unregulated markets; speculate without evidence; and reason fallaciously, favoring rhetorical impact over logic. The present paper is a corrective. It identifies these common errors so they are not repeated, thus allowing space for an assessment of the proposal on its merits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luke Semrau
- Department of PhilosophyBloomsburg UniversityBloomsburgPennsylvaniaUSA
| | - Arthur J. Matas
- Division of Transplantation, Department of SurgeryUniversity of MinnesotaMinneapolisMinnesotaUSA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Abstract
Historically, to minimize risks, living kidney donors have been highly selected and healthy. Operative risks are well-defined, yet concern remains about long-term risks. In the general population, even a mild reduction in glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is associated with cardiovascular disease, chronic kidney disease, and end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). However, reduction in GFR in the general population is due to kidney or systemic disease. Retrospective studies comparing donors with matched general population controls have found no increased donor risk. Prospective studies comparing donors with controls (maximum follow-up, 9 years) have reported that donor GFR is stable or increases slightly, whereas GFR decreases in controls. However, these same studies identified metabolic and vascular donor abnormalities. There are a few retrospective studies comparing donors with controls. Each has limitations in selection of the control group, statistical analyses, and/or length of follow-up. One such study reported increased donor mortality; 2 reported a small increase in absolute risk of ESKD. Risk factors for donor ESKD are similar to those in the general population. Postdonation pregnancies are also associated with increased risk of hypertension and preeclampsia. There is a critical need for long-term follow-up studies comparing donors with controls from the same era, geographic area, and socioeconomic status who are healthy, with normal renal function on the date matching the date of donation, and are matched on demographic characteristics with the donors. These data are needed to optimize donor candidate counseling and informed consent.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arthur J Matas
- Transplantation Division, Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.
| | - Andrew D Rule
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hypertension and diabetes are contraindications for living kidney donation in young candidates. However, little is known about the long-term outcomes of women who had these pregnancy-related complications and subsequently became donors. In the general population, gestational hypertension (GHtn), preeclampsia/eclampsia, and gestational diabetes (GDM) are associated with long-term risks. METHODS Donors with the specified predonation complication were matched to contemporary control donors with pregnancies without the complication using nearest neighbor propensity score matching. Propensity scores were estimated using logistic regression with covariates for gravidity, blood pressure, glucose, body mass index, age, and creatinine at donation, donation year, race, relationship with recipient, and family history of disease. Long-term incidence of hypertension, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and reduced renal function (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] <30, eGFR <45 mL/min/1.73 m 2 ) were compared between groups using proportional hazards models. RESULTS Of 1862 donors with predonation pregnancies, 48 had preeclampsia/eclampsia, 49 had GHtn without preeclampsia, and 43 had GDM. Donors had a long interval between first pregnancy and donation (median, 18.5 y; interquartile range, 10.6-27.5) and a long postdonation follow-up time (median, 18.0; interquartile range, 9.2-27.7 y). GHtn was associated with the development of hypertension (hazard ratio, 1.89; 95% confidence interval, 1.26-2.83); GDM was associated with diabetes (hazard ratio, 3.04; 95% confidence interval, 1.33-6.99). Pregnancy complications were not associated with eGFR <30 or eGFR <45 mL/min/1.73 m 2 . CONCLUSIONS Our data suggest that women with predonation pregnancy-related complications have long-term risks even with a normal donor evaluation. Donor candidates with a history of pregnancy-related complications should be counseled about these risks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erika S. Helgeson
- Division of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
| | - Elise F. Palzer
- Division of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
| | - David M. Vock
- Division of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
| | - Paige Porrett
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL
| | - Deirdre Sawinski
- Division of Renal Electrolyte and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Arthur J. Matas
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Matas AJ, Helgeson E, Fieberg A, Leduc R, Gaston RS, Kasiske BL, Rush D, Hunsicker L, Cosio F, Grande JP, Cecka JM, Connett J, Mannon RB. Risk Prediction for Delayed Allograft Function: Analysis of the Deterioration of Kidney Allograft Function (DeKAF) Study Data. Transplantation 2022; 106:358-368. [PMID: 33675321 PMCID: PMC8380757 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000003718] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Delayed graft function (DGF) of a kidney transplant results in increased cost and complexity of management. For clinical care or a DGF trial, it would be ideal to accurately predict individual DGF risk and provide preemptive treatment. A calculator developed by Irish et al has been useful for predicting population but not individual risk. METHODS We analyzed the Irish calculator (IC) in the DeKAF prospective cohort (incidence of DGF = 20.4%) and investigated potential improvements. RESULTS We found that the predictive performance of the calculator in those meeting Irish inclusion criteria was comparable with that reported by Irish et al. For cohorts excluded by Irish: (a) in pump-perfused kidneys, the IC overestimated DGF risk; (b) in simultaneous pancreas kidney transplants, the DGF risk was exceptionally low. For all 3 cohorts, there was considerable overlap in IC scores between those with and those without DGF. Using a modified definition of DGF-excluding those with single dialysis in the first 24 h posttransplant-we found that the calculator had similar performance as with the traditional DGF definition. Studying whether DGF prediction could be improved, we found that recipient cardiovascular disease was strongly associated with DGF even after accounting for IC-predicted risk. CONCLUSIONS The IC can be a useful population guide for predicting DGF in the population for which it was intended but has limited scope in expanded populations (SPK, pump) and for individual risk prediction. DGF risk prediction can be improved by inclusion of recipient cardiovascular disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arthur J Matas
- Transplantation Division, Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
| | - Erika Helgeson
- Biostatistics Division, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
| | - Ann Fieberg
- Biostatistics Division, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
| | - Robert Leduc
- Biostatistics Division, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
| | - Robert S Gaston
- Department of Medicine, University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL
| | | | - David Rush
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | | | - Fernando Cosio
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Joseph P Grande
- Division of Anatomic Pathology, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - J Michael Cecka
- Department of Pathology & Lab Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, UCLA Immunogenetics Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - John Connett
- Biostatistics Division, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
| | - Roslyn B Mannon
- University of Nebraska Medical Center and VA Nebraska-Western Iowa Health Care System, Omaha, NE
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Many kidney donor candidates with impaired fasting glucose (IFG) and all candidates with diabetes are currently excluded from kidney donation, fearing the development of an accelerated course of diabetic kidney disease in the remaining kidney. METHODS We studied mortality, proteinuria, and end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) in 8280 donors who donated between 1963 and 2007 according to donation fasting plasma glucose (FPG): <100 mg/dL (n = 6204), 100-125 mg/dL (n = 1826), and ≥126 mg/dL (n = 250). RESULTS Donors with IFG and those with FPG ≥126 mg/dL were older, less likely to be non-Hispanic White, had a higher body mass index, and were more likely to be related to their recipient. After 15.7 ± 10.5 y from donation to study close, 4.4% died, 29.4% developed hypertension, 13.8% developed proteinuria, and 41 (0.5%) developed ESKD. In both the logistic and Cox models, IFG was associated with a higher diabetes risk (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.65; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.18-2.30) and hypertension (aHR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.10-1.65; P = 0.003 for both), but not higher risk of proteinuria or ESKD. The multivariable risk of mortality in donors with ≥126 mg/dL was higher than the 2 other groups, but risks of proteinuria, cardiovascular disease, and reduced estimated glomerular filtration rate were similar to those with FPG <126 mg/dL. Three cases of ESKD developed in the 250 donors with FPG ≥126 mg/dL at 18.6 ± 10.3 y after donation (aHR, 5.36; 95% CI, 1.0-27.01; P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS Donors with IFG and the majority of donors with ≥126 mg/dL do well and perhaps should not be routinely excluded from donation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sean A Hebert
- Department of Medicine, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX
| | - Dina N Murad
- Department of Medicine, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX
| | - Duc T Nguyen
- Department of Pathology and Genomic Medicine, Institute for Academic Medicine, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX
| | - Edward A Graviss
- Department of Pathology and Genomic Medicine, Institute for Academic Medicine, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX
- Department of Surgery, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX
| | | | - Arthur J Matas
- Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Matas AJ. Nondirected, Advanced, and Voucher-Based Donation-The Importance of Terminology. JAMA Surg 2021; 157:280. [PMID: 34935865 DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2021.5767] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Arthur J Matas
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Glomerular size in renal allografts is impacted by donor-recipient factors and response to injury. In serial biopsies of patients with well-functioning grafts, increased glomerular size correlates with better survival. However, no previous study has addressed the association of glomerular size at the time of a for-cause biopsy and clinical/histopathologic markers of injury, or effect on long-term graft outcome. METHODS Two cohorts of kidney transplant recipients enrolled in the Deterioration of Kidney Allograft Function study were evaluated. The prospective cohort (PC, n = 581): patients undergoing first for-cause kidney biopsy 1.7 ± 1.4 (mean ± SD) y posttransplant; and the cross-sectional cohort (CSC, n = 446): patients developing new-onset renal function deterioration 7.7 ± 5.6 y posttransplant. Glomerular planar surface area and diameter were measured on all glomeruli containing a vascular pole. Kidney biopsy was read centrally in a blinded fashion according to the Banff criteria. RESULTS Glomerular area was significantly higher in the CSC than the PC; time from transplant to indication biopsy was associated with glomerular area in both cohorts (P values ≤ 0.001). Glomerular area was associated with indices of microvascular inflammation (glomerulitis, peritubular capillary infiltrates; P values ≤ 0.001) and segmental glomerulosclerosis (P value < 0.0001). In the CSC, higher glomerular area was associated with higher estimated glomerular filtration rate (P value ≤ 0.001) and increased graft survival after accounting for microvascular inflammation (adjusted hazard ratio = 0.967; 95% confidence interval: 0.948-0.986; hazard ratio in biopsies without evidence of diabetes or antibody mediated rejection = 0.919, 95% confidence interval: 0.856-0.987). CONCLUSIONS Glomerular size is associated with histopathologic features present at the time of indication biopsy and with increased graft survival in the CSC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Erika S. Helgeson
- University of Minnesota, School of Public Health, Division of Biostatistics, Minneapolis, MN
| | - Arthur J. Matas
- University of Minnesota, Department of Surgery, Transplantation Division, Minneapolis, MN
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Riad SM, Lim N, Jackson S, Matas AJ, Lake J. Outcomes of Kidney Allograft and Recipient Survival After Liver Transplantation by Induction Type in the United States. Liver Transpl 2021; 27:1553-1562. [PMID: 34145949 DOI: 10.1002/lt.26217] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2020] [Revised: 05/09/2021] [Accepted: 06/13/2021] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
There are several choices for induction immunosuppression in kidney-after-liver transplantation. We used the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients database. We assessed all kidney-after-liver transplant recipients in the United States between 1/1/2000 and 7/31/2017 to study kidney graft and patient outcomes by induction type. We only included patients discharged on tacrolimus and mycophenolate with or without steroids and had a negative crossmatch before kidney engraftment. We grouped recipients by kidney induction type into the following 3 groups: depletional (n = 550), nondepletional (n = 434), and no antibody induction (n = 144). We studied patient and kidney allograft survival using Cox proportional hazard regression, with transplant center included as a random effect. Models were adjusted for liver induction regimen, recipient and donor age, sex, human leukocyte antigen mismatches, payor type, living donor kidney transplantation, dialysis status, time from liver engraftment, hepatitis C virus status, and the presence of diabetes mellitus at time of kidney transplantation and transplantation year. The 6-month and 1-year rejection rates did not differ between groups. Compared with no induction, neither depletional nor nondepletional induction was associated with an improved recipient or graft survival in the multivariable models. Depletional induction at the time of liver transplantation was associated with worse patient survival after kidney transplantation (hazard ratio [HR], 1.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.09-2.67; P = 0.02). Living donor kidney transplantation was associated with a 48.1% improved graft survival (HR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.33-0.82; P = 0.00). In conclusion, in the settings of a negative cross-match and maintenance with tacrolimus and mycophenolate, induction use was not associated with a patient or graft survival benefit in kidney-after-liver transplantations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samy M Riad
- Division of Renal Diseases and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
| | - Nicholas Lim
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
| | - Scott Jackson
- Complex Care Analytics, Fairview Health Services, Minneapolis, MN
| | - Arthur J Matas
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
| | - John Lake
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Ibrahim HN, Murad DN, Hebert SA, Adrogue HE, Nguyen H, Nguyen DT, Matas AJ, Graviss EA. Intermediate Renal Outcomes, Kidney Failure, and Mortality in Obese Kidney Donors. J Am Soc Nephrol 2021; 32:2933-2947. [PMID: 34675059 PMCID: PMC8806092 DOI: 10.1681/asn.2021040548] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2021] [Accepted: 08/04/2021] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Obesity is associated with the two archetypal kidney disease risk factors: hypertension and diabetes. Concerns that the effects of diabetes and hypertension in obese kidney donors might be magnified in their remaining kidney have led to the exclusion of many obese candidates from kidney donation. METHODS We compared mortality, diabetes, hypertension, proteinuria, reduced eGFR and its trajectory, and the development of kidney failure in 8583 kidney donors, according to body mass index (BMI). The study included 6822 individuals with a BMI of <30 kg/m2, 1338 with a BMI of 30-34.9 kg/m2, and 423 with a BMI of ≥35 kg/m2. We used Cox regression models, adjusting for baseline covariates only, and models adjusting for postdonation diabetes, hypertension, and kidney failure as time-varying covariates. RESULTS Obese donors were more likely than nonobese donors to develop diabetes, hypertension, and proteinuria. The increase in eGFR in obese versus nonobese donors was significantly higher in the first 10 years (3.5 ml/min per 1.73m2 per year versus 2.4 ml/min per 1.73m2 per year; P<0.001), but comparable thereafter. At a mean±SD follow-up of 19.3±10.3 years after donation, 31 (0.5%) nonobese and 12 (0.7%) obese donors developed ESKD. Of the 12 patients with ESKD in obese donors, 10 occurred in 1445 White donors who were related to the recipient (0.9%). Risk of death in obese donors was not significantly increased compared with nonobese donors. CONCLUSIONS Obesity in kidney donors, as in nondonors, is associated with increased risk of developing diabetes and hypertension. The absolute risk of ESKD is small and the risk of death is comparable to that of nonobese donors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Dina N. Murad
- Department of Medicine, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas
| | - Sean A. Hebert
- Department of Medicine, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas
| | | | - Hana Nguyen
- Department of Medicine, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas
| | - Duc T. Nguyen
- Department of Pathology and Genomic Medicine, Institute for Academic Medicine, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, Texas
| | - Arthur J. Matas
- Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Edward A. Graviss
- Department of Pathology and Genomic Medicine, Institute for Academic Medicine, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, Texas
- Department of Surgery, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Affiliation(s)
- Arthur J Matas
- Department of Surgery, Division of Transplantation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Matas AJ, Mannon RB, Rush D, Helgeson E. Novel Phenotypes for Acute Kidney Transplant Rejection Using Semi-Supervised Clustering. J Am Soc Nephrol 2021; 32:2387-2388. [PMID: 34403355 PMCID: PMC8729828 DOI: 10.1681/asn.2021040572] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2021] [Revised: 05/28/2021] [Accepted: 06/01/2021] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Arthur J. Matas
- Transplantation Division, Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Roslyn B. Mannon
- University of Nebraska Medical Center and Nebraska–Western Iowa Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska
| | - David Rush
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Erika Helgeson
- Biostatistics Division, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Abstract
Living donor kidney transplantation benefits the recipient. However, kidney failure can occur in a small fraction of donors — the risk is not uniform but varies according to donor characteristics. Studies to date have failed to match on important factors, such as era, environment or family history. Long-term studies with well-matched healthy controls are therefore needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arthur J. Matas
- Department of Surgery, Transplantation Division, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA,
| | - Andrew D. Rule
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Al-Kofahi M, Oetting WS, Schladt DP, Remmel RP, Guan W, Wu B, Dorr CR, Mannon RB, Matas AJ, Israni AK, Jacobson PA. Precision Dosing for Tacrolimus Using Genotypes and Clinical Factors in Kidney Transplant Recipients of European Ancestry. J Clin Pharmacol 2021; 61:1035-1044. [PMID: 33512723 DOI: 10.1002/jcph.1823] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2020] [Accepted: 01/26/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Genetic variation in the CYP3A4 and CYP3A5 (CYP3A4/5) genes, which encode the key enzymes in tacrolimus metabolism, is associated with tacrolimus clearance and dose requirements. Tacrolimus has a narrow therapeutic index with high intra- and intersubject variability, in part because of genetic variation. High tacrolimus clearance and low trough concentration are associated with a greater risk for rejection, whereas high troughs are associated with calcineurin-induced toxicity. The objective of this study was to develop a model of tacrolimus clearance with a dosing equation accounting for genotypes and clinical factors in adult kidney transplant recipients of European ancestry that could preemptively guide dosing. Recipients receiving immediate-release tacrolimus for maintenance immunosuppression from 2 multicenter studies were included. Participants in the GEN03 study were used for tacrolimus model development (n = 608 recipients) and was validated by prediction performance in the DeKAF Genomics study (n = 1361 recipients). Nonlinear mixed-effects modeling was used to develop the apparent oral tacrolimus clearance (CL/F) model. CYP3A4/5 genotypes and clinical covariates were tested for their influence on CL/F. The predictive performance of the model was determined by assessing the bias (median prediction error [ME] and median percentage error [MPE]) and the precision (root median squared error [RMSE]) of the model. CYP3A5*3, CYP3A4*22, corticosteroids, calcium channel blocker and antiviral drug use, age, and diabetes significantly contributed to the interindividual variability of oral tacrolimus apparent clearance. The bias (ME, MPE) and precision (RMSE) of the final model was good, 0.49 ng/mL, 6.5%, and 3.09 ng/mL, respectively. Prospective testing of this equation is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mahmoud Al-Kofahi
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology, College of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - William S Oetting
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology, College of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - David P Schladt
- Hennepin Health Research Institute, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Rory P Remmel
- Department of Medicinal Chemistry, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Weihua Guan
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Baolin Wu
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Casey R Dorr
- Hennepin Health Research Institute, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
- Department of Medicine, Hennepin Healthcare, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Roslyn B Mannon
- Division of Nephrology, University of Nebraska, Omaha, Nebraska, USA
| | - Arthur J Matas
- Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Ajay K Israni
- Hennepin Health Research Institute, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
- Department of Medicine, Hennepin Healthcare, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
- Department of Epidemiology & Community Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Pamala A Jacobson
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology, College of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Hart A, Schladt DP, Matas AJ, Itzler R, Israni AK, Kasiske BL. Incidence, risk factors, and long-term outcomes associated with antibody-mediated rejection - The long-term Deterioration of Kidney Allograft Function (DeKAF) prospective cohort study. Clin Transplant 2021; 35:e14337. [PMID: 33955070 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.14337] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2020] [Revised: 04/12/2021] [Accepted: 04/19/2021] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
Major gaps remain in our understanding of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) after kidney transplant. We examined the incidence, risk factors, response to treatment, and effects on outcomes of AMR at seven transplant programs in the long-term Deterioration of Kidney Allograft Function prospective study cohort. Among 3131 kidney recipients, there were 194 observed AMR cases (6.2%) during (mean ± SD) 4.85 ± 1.86 years of follow-up. Time to AMR was 0.97 ± 1.17 (median, 0.48) years. Risk factors for AMR included younger recipient age, human leukocyte antigen DR mismatches, panel-reactive antibody >0%, positive T- or B-cell cross-match, and delayed graft function. Compared with no AMR, the adjusted time-dependent hazard ratio for death-censored graft failure is 10.1 (95% confidence interval, 6.5-15.7) for all AMR patients, 4.0 (2.5, 9.1) for early AMR (<90 days after transplant), and 24.0 (14.0-41.1) for late AMR (≥90 days after transplant). Patients were treated with different therapeutic combinations. Of 194 kidney transplant recipients with AMR, 50 (25.8%) did not respond to treatment, defined as second AMR within 100 days or no improvement in estimated glomerular filtration rate by 42 days. Long-term outcomes after AMR are poor, regardless of the initial response to treatment. Better prevention and new therapeutic strategies are needed to improve long-term allograft survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Allyson Hart
- Department of Medicine, Hennepin County Medical Center, Hennepin Healthcare, Minneapolis, MN, USA.,Chronic Disease Research Group, Hennepin Healthcare Research Institute, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - David P Schladt
- Chronic Disease Research Group, Hennepin Healthcare Research Institute, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Arthur J Matas
- Transplantation Division, Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | | | - Ajay K Israni
- Department of Medicine, Hennepin County Medical Center, Hennepin Healthcare, Minneapolis, MN, USA.,Chronic Disease Research Group, Hennepin Healthcare Research Institute, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Bertram L Kasiske
- Department of Medicine, Hennepin County Medical Center, Hennepin Healthcare, Minneapolis, MN, USA.,Chronic Disease Research Group, Hennepin Healthcare Research Institute, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Helgeson ES, Mannon R, Grande J, Gaston RS, Cecka MJ, Kasiske BL, Rush D, Gourishankar S, Cosio F, Hunsicker L, Connett J, Matas AJ. i-IFTA and chronic active T cell-mediated rejection: A tale of 2 (DeKAF) cohorts. Am J Transplant 2021; 21:1866-1877. [PMID: 33052625 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.16352] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2020] [Revised: 09/24/2020] [Accepted: 09/30/2020] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Inflammation in areas of fibrosis (i-IFTA) in posttransplant biopsies is part of the diagnostic criteria for chronic active TCMR (CA TCMR -- i-IFTA ≥ 2, ti ≥ 2, t ≥ 2). We evaluated i-IFTA and CA TCMR in the DeKAF indication biopsy cohorts: prospective (n = 585, mean time to biopsy = 1.7 years); cross-sectional (n = 458, mean time to biopsy = 7.8 years). Grouped by i-IFTA scores, the 3-year postbiopsy DC-GS is similar across cohorts. Although a previous acute rejection episode (AR) was more common in those with i-IFTA on biopsy, the majority of those with i-IFTA had not had previous AR. There was no association between type of previous AR (AMR, TCMR) and presence of i-IFTA. In both cohorts, i-IFTA was associated with markers of both cellular (increased Banff i, t, ti) and humoral (increased g, ptc, C4d, DSA) activity. Biopsies with i-IFTA = 1 and i-IFTA ≥ 2 with concurrent t ≥ 2 and ti ≥ 2 had similar DC-GS. These results suggest that (a) i-IFTA≥1 should be considered a threshold for diagnoses incorporating i-IFTA, ti, and t; (b) given that i-IFTA ≥ 2,t ≥ 2, ti ≥ 2 can occur in the absence of preceding TCMR and that the component histologic scores (i-IFTA,t,ti) each indicate an acute change (albeit i-IFTA on the nonspecific background of IFTA), the diagnostic category "CA TCMR" should be reconsidered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erika S Helgeson
- School of Public Health, Division of Biostatistics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Roslyn Mannon
- University of Nebraska Medical Center and Nebraska-Western Iowa Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska
| | | | - Robert S Gaston
- University of Nebraska Medical Center and Nebraska-Western Iowa Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska
| | - Michael J Cecka
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California
| | | | - David Rush
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Sita Gourishankar
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Univeristy of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | | | | | - John Connett
- School of Public Health, Division of Biostatistics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Arthur J Matas
- Department of Surgery, Transplantation Division, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Affiliation(s)
- Arthur J Matas
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Matas AJ, Helgeson ES. The family voucher program: A 50-year simulation. Am J Transplant 2021; 21:1350-1351. [PMID: 33040494 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.16344] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2020] [Revised: 09/10/2020] [Accepted: 10/04/2020] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Arthur J Matas
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Erika S Helgeson
- Division of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Affiliation(s)
- Elise F Palzer
- Division of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Shruti Vempati
- Division of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Erika S Helgeson
- Division of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Arthur J Matas
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Vock DM, Kuehne A, Northrop EF, Matas AJ, Larson Nath C, Chinnakotla S. Pediatric retransplantation of the liver: A prognostic scoring tool. Pediatr Transplant 2020; 24:e13775. [PMID: 32794255 DOI: 10.1111/petr.13775] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2020] [Revised: 05/13/2020] [Accepted: 06/02/2020] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Few prognostic models have been created in children that receive liver retransplantation (rLT). We examined the SRTR database of 731 children that underwent second liver transplant between 2002 and 2018. Proportional hazards models using backward variable selection were used to identify recipient, donor, and surgical characteristics associated with survival. A simple prognostic scoring system or nomogram (ie, each risk factor was weighted on a five-point scale) was constructed based on the fitted model. Recipient age (P < .001), MELD/PELD (P < .001), recipient ventilated (P = .003), donor cause of death (P = .024), graft type (P = .045), first graft loss due to biliary tract complications (P = .048), and survival time of the first graft (P = .006) were significant predictors of retransplant survival. The bias-corrected Harrell's C-index for the multivariable model was 0.63. Survival was significantly different (P < .001) for those at low risk (0-4 points), medium risk (5-7 points), and high risk (8+ points). Survival was equivalent between low risk pediatric second transplant recipients and pediatric primary liver transplant recipients (P = .67) but significantly worse for medium- (P < .001) and high-risk (P < .001) recipients. With simple clinical characteristics, this scoring tool can modestly discriminate between those children at high risk and those children at low risk of poor outcomes after second liver transplant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David M Vock
- Division of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Alexander Kuehne
- Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Elise F Northrop
- Division of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Arthur J Matas
- Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | | | - Srinath Chinnakotla
- Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.,Department of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Matas AJ, Payne WD. Organ Donation After Euthanasia. JAMA Surg 2020; 155:924-925. [PMID: 32756887 DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.2514] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Arthur J Matas
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis
| | - William D Payne
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Matas AJ, Helgeson ES, Gaston R, Cosio F, Mannon R, Kasiske BL, Hunsicker L, Gourishankar S, Rush D, Michael Cecka J, Connett J, Grande JP. Inflammation in areas of fibrosis: The DeKAF prospective cohort. Am J Transplant 2020; 20:2509-2521. [PMID: 32185865 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.15862] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2019] [Revised: 02/13/2020] [Accepted: 02/27/2020] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Inflammation in areas of fibrosis (i-IFTA) in posttransplant biopsy specimens has been associated with decreased death-censored graft survival (DC-GS). Additionally, an i-IFTA score ≥ 2 is part of the diagnostic criteria for chronic active TCMR (CA TCMR). We examined the impact of i-IFTA and t-IFTA (tubulitis in areas of atrophy) in the first biopsy for cause after 90 days posttransplant (n = 598); mean (SD) 1.7 ± 1.4 years posttransplant. I-IFTA, present in 196 biopsy specimens, was strongly correlated with t-IFTA, and Banff i. Of the 196, 37 (18.9%) had a previous acute rejection episode; 96 (49%) had concurrent i score = 0. Unlike previous studies, i-IFTA = 1 (vs 0) was associated with worse 3-year DC-GS: (i-IFTA = 0, 81.7%, [95% CI 77.7 to 85.9%]); i-IFTA = 1, 68.1%, [95% CI 59.7 to 77.6%]; i-IFTA = 2, 56.1%, [95% CI 43.2 to 72.8%], i-IFTA = 3, 48.5%, [95% CI 31.8 to 74.0%]). The association of i-IFTA with decreased DC-GS remained significant when adjusted for serum creatinine at the time of the biopsy, Banff i, ci and ct, C4d and DSA. T-IFTA was similarly associated with decreased DC-GS. Of these indication biopsies, those with i-IFTA ≥ 2, without meeting other criteria for CA TCMR had similar postbiopsy DC-GS as those with CA TCMR. Those with i-IFTA = 1 and t ≥ 2, ti ≥ 2 had postbiopsy DC-GS similar to CA TCMR. Biopsies with i-IFTA = 1 had similar survival as CA TCMR when biopsy specimens also met Banff criteria for TCMR and/or AMR. Studies of i-IFTA and t-IFTA in additional cohorts, integrating analyses of Banff scores meeting criteria for other Banff diagnoses, are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arthur J Matas
- Transplantation Division, Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Erika S Helgeson
- Division of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Robert Gaston
- Department of Medicine, University of Alabama, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | | | - Roslyn Mannon
- Department of Medicine, University of Alabama, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | | | - Lawrence Hunsicker
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| | - Sita Gourishankar
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Univeristy of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - David Rush
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - J Michael Cecka
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - John Connett
- Division of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Verghese PS, Chinnakotla S, Berglund D, Matas AJ, Chavers B. Re-hospitalization after pediatric kidney transplant: A single-center study. Pediatr Transplant 2020; 24:e13717. [PMID: 32447837 DOI: 10.1111/petr.13717] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2019] [Revised: 03/09/2020] [Accepted: 03/30/2020] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Little data exist on re-hospitalization rates in pediatric kidney recipients (KTx) particularly with the evolution of transplant immunosuppression. METHODS In a single-center, retrospective study of pediatric KTx between 2006 and 2016, we assessed re-hospitalization after KTx admission, stratified by whether the re-admit was early (<30 days post-KTx discharge) or late (>30 days), and compared two different immunosuppression eras (one with and one without steroids). RESULTS Of 197 KTx, 156 (79%) patients were re-hospitalized in 1st year, 85 (56%) within 30 days of discharge (total 490 1st year re-hospitalizations). Younger age was associated with early and late re-hospitalizations. African American race was associated with early re-hospitalizations. Of the 123 and 74 discharged on steroid-avoidance (maintenance immunosuppression included MMF in 95%; FK in 50%; CSA in 50%) and steroid-inclusive (AZA in 66%; MMF in 34%; FK in 30%; CSA in 70%), re-hospitalization rates, timing post-transplant, length, and number were not significantly different (P .38; .1; .56; .11). Admission diagnoses analysis demonstrated that steroid-avoidance recipients had anemia/leucopenia/thrombocytopenia, significantly more often, as one of their admission diagnoses (16% vs 4%; P < .001) and had a rejection diagnosis significantly less often (6% vs 18%; P < .001). Infection diagnoses were not statistically different between groups. Re-hospitalization, early or late, did not predict worse graft/ patient survival but predicted further hospitalizations. CONCLUSIONS Re-hospitalization is common after pediatric transplant discharge and predicts further hospitalization regardless of discharge on or off steroids.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Priya S Verghese
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Pediatrics, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.,Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Srinath Chinnakotla
- Division of Transplant, Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Danielle Berglund
- Division of Transplant, Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Arthur J Matas
- Division of Transplant, Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Blanche Chavers
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Nguyen TT, Pearson RA, Mohamed ME, Schladt DP, Berglund D, Rivers Z, Skaar DJ, Wu B, Guan W, van Setten J, Keating BJ, Dorr C, Remmel RP, Matas AJ, Mannon RB, Israni AK, Oetting WS, Jacobson PA. Pharmacogenomics in kidney transplant recipients and potential for integration into practice. J Clin Pharm Ther 2020; 45:1457-1465. [PMID: 32662547 DOI: 10.1111/jcpt.13223] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2019] [Revised: 05/14/2020] [Accepted: 06/11/2020] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE Pharmacogenomic biomarkers are now used in many clinical care settings and represent one of the successes of precision medicine. Genetic variants are associated with pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic changes leading to medication adverse effects and changes in clinical response. Actionable pharmacogenomic variants are common in transplant recipients and have implications for medications used in transplant, but yet are not broadly incorporated into practice. METHODS From the Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium and Dutch Pharmacogenetics Working Group guidelines, and PharmGKB databases, 12 pharmacogenomic genes with 30 variants were selected and used to create diplotypes and actionable pharmacogenomic phenotypes. A total of 853 kidney allograft recipients who had genomic information available from a genome-wide association study were included. RESULTS Each recipient had at least one actionable pharmacogenomic diplotype/phenotype, whereas the majority (58%) had three or four actionable diplotypes/phenotypes and 17.4% had five or more among the 12 genes. The participants carried actionable diplotypes/phenotypes for multiple medications, including tacrolimus, azathioprine, clopidogrel, warfarin, simvastatin, voriconazole, antidepressants and proton-pump inhibitors. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION Pharmacogenomic variants are common in transplant recipients, and transplant recipients receive medications that have actionable variants. CLINICAL TRIAL Genomics of Transplantation, clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01714440).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tam T Nguyen
- College of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | | | - Moataz E Mohamed
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology, College of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.,Department of Pharmacy Practice, Faculty of Pharmacy, Helwan University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - David P Schladt
- Chronic Disease Research Group, Minneapolis Medical Research Foundation, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Danielle Berglund
- Complex Care Core Analytics, Fairview University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Zachary Rivers
- Social and Administrative Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Debra J Skaar
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology, College of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Baolin Wu
- Division of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Weihua Guan
- Division of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Jessica van Setten
- Department of Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, University of Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Brendan J Keating
- Penn Transplant Institute, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Casey Dorr
- Minneapolis Medical Research Foundation and Division of Nephrology, Hennepin Healthcare, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Rory P Remmel
- Department of Medicinal Chemistry, College of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Arthur J Matas
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Roslyn B Mannon
- Department of Nephrology, School of Medicine, University of Nebraska, Omaha, NE, USA
| | - Ajay K Israni
- Division of Nephrology, Hennepin Healthcare, Minneapolis, MN, USA.,Epidemiology & Community Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - William S Oetting
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology, College of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Pamala A Jacobson
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology, College of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Affiliation(s)
- Arthur J. Matas
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis
| | - Hassan N. Ibrahim
- Division of Renal Diseases and Hypertension, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas
| | - David M. Vock
- Division of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Yadav K, Vock DM, Matas AJ, Robiner WN, Nevins TE. Medication adherence is associated with an increased risk of cancer in kidney transplant recipients: a cohort study. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2020; 34:364-370. [PMID: 30102328 DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfy210] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2018] [Accepted: 06/06/2018] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Nonadherence to posttransplant immunosuppressive medication is associated with increased rates of rejection and graft loss, yet it is unknown to what degree ideal adherence is associated with the sequelae of overimmunosuppression. Specifically, we questioned whether excellent adherence increased the posttransplant cancer risk. Methods Between August 1998 and August 2006, 195 consenting kidney transplant recipients had electronic monitoring of theirimmunosuppressive medication adherence. Results Based on their average quantitative adherence to a single immunosuppressant drug over the first 6 months posttransplant, recipients were grouped into adherence tertiles (highest, >97.9% adherence; middle, 91-97.8%; lowest, <91%). The cumulative incidence of cancer was calculated for patients in each tertile, treating death as a competing risk. The association between adherence and cancer rate was calculated after adjusting for recipient risk factors, using a competing risk proportional hazards model. The median duration of follow-up was 10.1 years. The 10-year estimated cumulative cancer incidence was 59.4% in the most adherent, 36.1% in the middle group and 38.1% in the least adherent group (P = 0.006). Excluding nonmelanocytic skin cancers, cancer incidence remained significantly higher in the highest adherence group (P = 0.002). Conclusions These data provide additional support for the need to individualize immunosuppression to minimize both rejection and immunosuppressive drug-related complications including cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kunal Yadav
- Department of Surgery, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA
| | - David M Vock
- Division of Biostatistics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Arthur J Matas
- Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - William N Robiner
- Department of Medicine and Pediatrics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Thomas E Nevins
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Serrano OK, Gannon A, Olowofela AS, Reddy A, Berglund D, Matas AJ. Long-term outcomes of pediatric kidney transplant recipients with a pretransplant malignancy. Pediatr Transplant 2019; 23:e13557. [PMID: 31407868 DOI: 10.1111/petr.13557] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2018] [Revised: 07/06/2019] [Accepted: 07/11/2019] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
A childhood malignancy can rarely progress to ESRD requiring a KT. To date, few reports describe long-term outcomes of pediatric KT recipients with a pretransplant malignancy. Between 1963 and 2015, 884 pediatric (age: 0-17 years old) recipients received 1055 KTs at our institution. KT outcomes were analyzed in children with a pretransplant malignancy. We identified 14 patients who had a pretransplant malignancy prior to KT; the majority were <10 years old at the time of KT. Ten (71%) patients received their grafts from living donors, the majority of which were related to the recipient. Wilms' tumor was the dominant type of pretransplant malignancy, seen in 50% of patients. The other pretransplant malignancy types were EBV-positive lymphoproliferative disorders, non-EBV-positive lymphoma, leukemia, neuroblastoma, soft-tissue sarcoma, and ovarian cancer. Ten of the 14 patients received chemotherapy as part of their pretransplant malignancy treatment. Graft survival at 1, 3, and 5 years was 93%, 83%, and 72%, respectively. Patient survival at 1, 5, and 10 years was 100%, 91%, and 83%, respectively. Six (40%) patients suffered AR following KT; half of them had their first episode of AR within 1 month of KT. Our single-center experience demonstrates that pediatric KT recipients with a previously treated pretransplant malignancy did not exhibit worse outcomes than other pediatric KT patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oscar K Serrano
- Department of Surgery, Division of Transplantation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Alexis Gannon
- Department of Surgery, Division of Transplantation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Ayokunle S Olowofela
- Department of Surgery, Division of Transplantation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Apoorva Reddy
- Department of Surgery, Division of Transplantation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Danielle Berglund
- Department of Surgery, Division of Transplantation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Arthur J Matas
- Department of Surgery, Division of Transplantation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Vock DM, Matas AJ. Rapid discontinuation of prednisone in kidney transplant recipients from at-risk subgroups: an OPTN/SRTR analysis. Transpl Int 2019; 33:181-201. [PMID: 31557340 DOI: 10.1111/tri.13530] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2019] [Revised: 07/30/2019] [Accepted: 09/19/2019] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Although rapid discontinuation of prednisone (RDP) after kidney transplantation has been successful in low-risk recipients, there is concern about RDP use in recipients at increased risk for rejection or recurrent disease. Using SRTR, we compared outcomes for RDP versus maintenance prednisone-treated recipients for all adult 1st and 2nd transplants (n = 169 479) and the following 1st transplant subgroups: African American (AA); highly sensitized; those with a potentially recurrent disease; and pediatric recipients. For all adult 1st LD and DD transplants, RDP was associated with better patient and graft survival. For all LD subgroups, RDP and maintenance prednisone were associated with similar patient, graft, and death-censored (DC) graft survival. For 1st transplant DD subgroups, RDP was associated with better patient survival in AA, those with potentially recurrent disease, and pediatric recipients; graft survival with RDP was better in AAs. For adult 2nd DD transplants, RDP was associated with worse DC-graft survival. Importantly, for all differences, the effect size was small. With the exception of 2nd DD transplants, RDP protocols can be used without decreasing patient or graft survival for subgroups of 1st DD and LD kidney transplant recipients and for 2nd LD transplant recipients, at increased risk of rejection or recurrent disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David M Vock
- Division of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Arthur J Matas
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Medical School, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Mohamed ME, Schladt DP, Guan W, Wu B, van Setten J, Keating B, Iklé D, Remmel RP, Dorr CR, Mannon RB, Matas AJ, Israni AK, Oetting WS, Jacobson PA. Tacrolimus troughs and genetic determinants of metabolism in kidney transplant recipients: A comparison of four ancestry groups. Am J Transplant 2019; 19:2795-2804. [PMID: 30953600 PMCID: PMC6763344 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.15385] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2018] [Revised: 03/04/2019] [Accepted: 03/28/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Tacrolimus trough and dose requirements vary dramatically between individuals of European and African American ancestry. These differences are less well described in other populations. We conducted an observational, prospective, multicenter study from which 2595 kidney transplant recipients of European, African, Native American, and Asian ancestry were studied for tacrolimus trough, doses, and genetic determinants of metabolism. We studied the well-known variants and conducted a CYP3A4/5 gene-wide analysis to identify new variants. Daily doses, and dose-normalized troughs were significantly different between the four groups (P < .001). CYP3A5*3 (rs776746) was associated with higher dose-normalized tacrolimus troughs in all groups but occurred at different allele frequencies and had differing effect sizes. The CYP3A5*6 (rs10264272) and *7 (rs413003343) variants were only present in African Americans. CYP3A4*22 (rs35599367) was not found in any of the Asian ancestry samples. We identified seven suggestive variants in the CYP3A4/5 genes associated with dose-normalized troughs in Native Americans (P = 1.1 × 10-5 -8.8 × 10-6 ) and one suggestive variant in Asian Americans (P = 5.6 × 10-6 ). Tacrolimus daily doses and dose-normalized troughs vary significantly among different ancestry groups. We identified potential new variants important in Asians and Native Americans. Studies with larger populations should be conducted to assess the importance of the identified suggestive variants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Moataz E. Mohamed
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology, College of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA,Department of Pharmacy Practice, Faculty of Pharmacy, Helwan University, Cairo, Egypt
| | | | - Weihua Guan
- Division of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
| | - Baolin Wu
- Division of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
| | - Jessica van Setten
- Department of Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, University of Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Brendan Keating
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | - Rory P. Remmel
- Department of Medicinal Chemistry, College of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Casey R. Dorr
- Hennepin Healthcare Research Institute, Minneapolis, MN, USA,Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Hennepin Healthcare, Minneapolis, MN
| | | | - Arthur J. Matas
- Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Ajay K. Israni
- Hennepin Healthcare Research Institute, Minneapolis, MN, USA,Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Hennepin Healthcare, Minneapolis, MN,Department of Epidemiology & Community Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - William S. Oetting
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology, College of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Pamala A. Jacobson
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology, College of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Grande JP, Helgeson ES, Leduc R, Matas AJ. P195 Correlation of glomerular size with donor-recipient factors and with response to injury. Hum Immunol 2019. [DOI: 10.1016/j.humimm.2019.07.248] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
|
41
|
Matas AJ, Vock DM. Prednisone‐free maintenance immunosuppression in obese kidney transplant recipients. Clin Transplant 2019; 33:e13668. [DOI: 10.1111/ctr.13668] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2019] [Revised: 06/24/2019] [Accepted: 07/10/2019] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Arthur J. Matas
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Medical School University of Minnesota Minneapolis MN USA
| | - David M. Vock
- Division of Biostatistics, School of Public Health University of Minnesota Minneapolis MN USA
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Stapleton CP, Heinzel A, Guan W, van der Most PJ, van Setten J, Lord GM, Keating BJ, Israni AK, de Borst MH, Bakker SJ, Snieder H, Weale ME, Delaney F, Hernandez‐Fuentes MP, Reindl-Schwaighofer R, Oberbauer R, Jacobson PA, Mark PB, Chapman FA, Phelan PJ, Kennedy C, Sexton D, Murray S, Jardine A, Traynor JP, McKnight AJ, Maxwell AP, Smyth LJ, Oetting WS, Matas AJ, Mannon RB, Schladt DP, Iklé DN, Cavalleri GL, Conlon PJ. The impact of donor and recipient common clinical and genetic variation on estimated glomerular filtration rate in a European renal transplant population. Am J Transplant 2019; 19:2262-2273. [PMID: 30920136 PMCID: PMC6989089 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.15326] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2018] [Revised: 01/22/2019] [Accepted: 02/11/2019] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Genetic variation across the human leukocyte antigen loci is known to influence renal-transplant outcome. However, the impact of genetic variation beyond the human leukocyte antigen loci is less clear. We tested the association of common genetic variation and clinical characteristics, from both the donor and recipient, with posttransplant eGFR at different time-points, out to 5 years posttransplantation. We conducted GWAS meta-analyses across 10 844 donors and recipients from five European ancestry cohorts. We also analyzed the impact of polygenic risk scores (PRS), calculated using genetic variants associated with nontransplant eGFR, on posttransplant eGFR. PRS calculated using the recipient genotype alone, as well as combined donor and recipient genotypes were significantly associated with eGFR at 1-year posttransplant. Thirty-two percent of the variability in eGFR at 1-year posttransplant was explained by our model containing clinical covariates (including weights for death/graft-failure), principal components and combined donor-recipient PRS, with 0.3% contributed by the PRS. No individual genetic variant was significantly associated with eGFR posttransplant in the GWAS. This is the first study to examine PRS, composed of variants that impact kidney function in the general population, in a posttransplant context. Despite PRS being a significant predictor of eGFR posttransplant, the effect size of common genetic factors is limited compared to clinical variables.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caragh P. Stapleton
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Therapeutics, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Andreas Heinzel
- Division of Nephrology and Dialysis, Department of Internal Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Weihua Guan
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Peter J. van der Most
- Departments of Epidemiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Jessica van Setten
- Department of Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, University of Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Graham M. Lord
- King’s College London, MRC Centre for Transplantation, London, UK
- NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at Guy’s and St Thomas’, NHS Foundation Trust and King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Brendan J. Keating
- Department of Surgery, Penn Transplant Institute, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Ajay K. Israni
- Department of Medicine, Hennepin County Medical Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Martin H. de Borst
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Stephan J.L. Bakker
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Harold Snieder
- Departments of Epidemiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Michael E. Weale
- Division of Genetics & Molecular Medicine, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Florence Delaney
- King’s College London, MRC Centre for Transplantation, London, UK
- NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at Guy’s and St Thomas’, NHS Foundation Trust and King’s College London, London, UK
| | | | - Roman Reindl-Schwaighofer
- Division of Nephrology and Dialysis, Department of Internal Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Rainer Oberbauer
- Division of Nephrology and Dialysis, Department of Internal Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Pamala A. Jacobson
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology, College of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Patrick B. Mark
- Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, BHF Cardiovascular Research Centre, University of Glasgow, UK
| | - Fiona A. Chapman
- Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, BHF Cardiovascular Research Centre, University of Glasgow, UK
| | - Paul J. Phelan
- Department of Nephrology, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, NHS Lothian, UK
| | - Claire Kennedy
- Department of Nephrology, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Donal Sexton
- Department of Nephrology, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Susan Murray
- Department of Nephrology, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Alan Jardine
- Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, BHF Cardiovascular Research Centre, University of Glasgow, UK
| | - Jamie P. Traynor
- Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, BHF Cardiovascular Research Centre, University of Glasgow, UK
| | | | | | - Laura J. Smyth
- Centre for Public Health, Queen’s University of Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - William S. Oetting
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology, College of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Arthur J. Matas
- Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Roslyn B. Mannon
- Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Gianpiero L. Cavalleri
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Therapeutics, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Peter J. Conlon
- Department of Nephrology, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
- Department of Medicine, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Serrano OK, Vock DM, Snyder JJ, Chinnakotla S, Kandaswamy R, Pruett TL, Matas AJ, Finger EB. Influence of the procurement surgeon on transplanted abdominal organ outcomes: An SRTR analysis to evaluate regional organ procurement collaboration. Am J Transplant 2019; 19:2219-2231. [PMID: 30748093 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.15301] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2018] [Revised: 01/22/2019] [Accepted: 01/26/2019] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Single-center studies have demonstrated regional organ procurement collaboration to reduce travel redundancy and improve procurement efficiency. We studied deceased donor kidney, liver, and pancreas transplants performed in the United States between 2002 and 2014 using the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR). We compared graft failure (GF), death-censored graft failure (DCGF), and patient death (PD) between organs procured by surgeons from the recipient's center (transplant procurement team [TPT]) versus surgeons from a different center (NTPT). Primary nonfunction (PNF) was assessed for liver and kidney and delayed graft function (DGF) for kidney using mixed-effects logistic modeling. There were 64 906 liver (61.6% TPT), 118 152 kidney (26.1% TPT), 10 832 simultaneous pancreas kidney (SPK; 56.6% TPT), and 4378 solitary pancreas (SP; 34.0% TPT) transplants. When compared to NTPT, DCGF for organs procured by TPT was significantly less for liver (adjusted HR: 0.93; 95% CI: 0.88-0.98) and marginally significant for kidney (0.97; 0.93-1.00) and SPK (0.90; 0.82-1.00), and not significant for SP (0.98; 0.86 -1.11). DGF for TPT kidney was significantly lower (adjusted OR 0.91; 0.87-0.95). Albeit modest, our findings demonstrate a difference between locally procured organs and those procured by the implanting team. Elucidating the etiology of these differences will enhance regional organ procurement collaboration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oscar K Serrano
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - David M Vock
- Division of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Jon J Snyder
- Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, Minneapolis Medical Research Foundation, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Srinath Chinnakotla
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Raja Kandaswamy
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Timothy L Pruett
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Arthur J Matas
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Erik B Finger
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Keys DO, Jackson S, Berglund D, Matas AJ. Kidney donor outcomes ≥ 50 years after donation. Clin Transplant 2019; 33:e13657. [PMID: 31283043 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.13657] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2019] [Accepted: 07/01/2019] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
Many living kidney donors (LDs) are young at donation; yet there are little data on long-term LD follow-up. We report on 66 LDs who donated ≥50 years ago: 22 (33.3%) are still alive (current age, 78.5 ± 7.25 years); 39 (59%) died (mean age at death, 74.2 ± 12.3 years); and 5 are lost to follow-up (mean age at last contact, 68.7 ± 4.6 years). Those who died were older at donation (P < .001). Causes of death included 12 (30.8% of deaths) cardiovascular diseases, 9 (23.0%) respiratory failures, 5 (12.8%) malignancies and 4 (10.3%) infections, and 9 (23%) were unknown or miscellaneous. Forty-nine living donors (74%) developed hypertension at a mean age of 59.9 ± 14.0 years; 12 (18%) developed diabetes at a mean age of 62 ± 19.4 years; and 11 (16.7%) developed proteinuria at a mean age of 60.6 ± 18.2 years-each at a similar incidence as seen in the age-matched general population. At last follow-up, the eGFR by CKD-EPI (mean ± SD) for donors currently alive was 60.2 ± 13.4 mL/min/1.73 m2 ; for those that died, 54.0 ± 21.5 mL/min/1.73 m2 ; for those lost to follow-up, 55.6 ± 7.5 mL/min/1.73 m2 . ESRD developed in 2 (3.3%). SF-36 quality of life health survey scores (n = 21) were similar to the age-matched general population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel O Keys
- Division of Renal Diseases and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Scott Jackson
- Informatics Services for Researching & Reporting, Fairview, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Danielle Berglund
- Informatics Services for Researching & Reporting, Fairview, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Arthur J Matas
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Issa N, Vaughan LE, Denic A, Kremers WK, Chakkera HA, Park W, Matas AJ, Taler SJ, Stegall MD, Augustine J, Rule AD. Larger nephron size, low nephron number, and nephrosclerosis on biopsy as predictors of kidney function after donating a kidney. Am J Transplant 2019; 19:1989-1998. [PMID: 30629312 PMCID: PMC6591036 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.15259] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2018] [Revised: 12/14/2018] [Accepted: 01/06/2019] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
It is unclear whether structural findings in the kidneys of living kidney donors predict postdonation kidney function. We studied living kidney donors who had a kidney biopsy during donation. Nephron size was measured by glomerular volume, cortex volume per glomerulus, and mean cross-sectional tubular area. Age-specific thresholds were defined for low nephron number (calculated from CT and biopsy measures) and nephrosclerosis (global glomerulosclerosis, interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy, and arteriosclerosis). These structural measures were assessed as predictors of postdonation measured GFR, 24-hour urine albumin, and hypertension. Analyses were adjusted for baseline age, gender, body mass index, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, hypertension, measured GFR, urine albumin, living related donor status, and time since donation. Of 2673 donors, 1334 returned for a follow-up visit at a median 4.4 months after donation, with measured GFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 in 34%, urine albumin >5 mg/24 h in 13%, and hypertension in 5.3%. Larger glomerular volume and interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy predicted follow-up measured GFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 . Larger cortex volume per glomerulus and low nephron number predicted follow-up urine albumin >5 mg/24 h. Arteriosclerosis predicted hypertension. Microstructural findings predict GFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 , modest increases in urine albumin, and hypertension shortly after kidney donation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naim Issa
- Division of Nephrology & Hypertension, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Lisa E. Vaughan
- Biomedical Statistics & Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Aleksandar Denic
- Division of Nephrology & Hypertension, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | | | - Walter Park
- Division of Nephrology & Hypertension, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | - Sandra J. Taler
- Division of Nephrology & Hypertension, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | | | - Andrew D. Rule
- Division of Nephrology & Hypertension, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Matas AJ, Fieberg A, Mannon RB, Leduc R, Grande J, Kasiske BL, Cecka M, Gaston R, Hunsicker L, Connett J, Cosio F, Gourishankar S, Rush D. Long-term follow-up of the DeKAF cross-sectional cohort study. Am J Transplant 2019; 19:1432-1443. [PMID: 30506642 PMCID: PMC7653899 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.15204] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2018] [Revised: 10/24/2018] [Accepted: 11/19/2018] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
The DeKAF study was developed to better understand the causes of late allograft loss. Preliminary findings from the DeKAF cross-sectional cohort (with follow-up < 20 months) have been published. Herein, we present long-term outcomes in those recipients (mean follow-up ± SD, 6.6 ± 0.7 years). Eligibility included being transplanted prior to October 1, 2005; serum creatinine ≤ 2.0 mg/dL on January 1, 2006; and subsequently developing new-onset graft dysfunction leading to a biopsy. Mean time from transplant to biopsy was 7.5 ± 6.1 years. Histologic findings and DSA were studied in relation to postbiopsy outcomes. Long-term follow-up confirms and expands the preliminary results of each of 3 studies: (1) increasing inflammation in area of atrophy (irrespective of inflammation in nonscarred areas [Banff i]) was associated with increasingly worse postbiopsy death-censored graft survival; (2) hierarchical analysis based on Banff scores defined clusters (entities) that differed in long-term death-censored graft survival; and (3) C4d-/DSA- recipients had significantly better (and C4d+/DSA+ worse) death-censored graft survival than other groups. C4d+/DSA- and C4d-/DSA+ had similar intermediate death-censored graft survival. Clinical and histologic findings at the time of new-onset graft dysfunction define high- vs low-risk groups for long-term death-censored graft survival, even years posttransplant. These findings can help differentiate groups for potential intervention studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arthur J. Matas
- Transplantation Division, Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Ann Fieberg
- Biostatistics Division, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Roslyn B. Mannon
- Department of Nephrology, University of Alabama, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Robert Leduc
- Biostatistics Division, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Joe Grande
- Nephrology and Transplant Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Bertram L. Kasiske
- Chronic Disease and Research Group, Hennepin Healthcare, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Michael Cecka
- Ronald Reagan UCLA Medicine Center, University of California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Robert Gaston
- Department of Nephrology, University of Alabama, Birmingham, Alabama
| | | | - John Connett
- Biostatistics Division, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Fernando Cosio
- Nephrology and Transplant Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Sita Gourishankar
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - David Rush
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Jacobs C, Berglund DM, Wiseman JF, Garvey C, Larson DB, Voges M, Radecki Breitkopf C, Ibrahim HN, Matas AJ. Long-term psychosocial outcomes after nondirected donation: A single-center experience. Am J Transplant 2019; 19:1498-1506. [PMID: 30417522 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.15179] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2018] [Revised: 10/19/2018] [Accepted: 11/01/2018] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Short-term studies have demonstrated that nondirected donors (NDDs) have psychosocial outcomes that are similar to donors who donate directly, but long-term studies have not been done. NDDs at our center were surveyed regarding motivation; support during donation; stress related to donation; regret; financial resources used for donation; preferences about communication with the recipient; and cost reimbursement. Of 100 NDDs who donated at our center in the last 20 years, 95 remain in contact with us, and 77 responded to our survey (mean ± standard deviation [SD] 6.7 ± 4 years postdonation). The most common motivation for donation was the desire to help another (99%). Many NDDs received support from family, friends, and employers. NDDs voiced stress about the possibility of recipient kidney rejection, physical consequences to themselves, and financial burden. Only one donor expressed regret. Almost half wanted some recipient information at donation; 61% preferred routine recipient status updates; 56% believed meeting the recipient should occur at any mutually agreeable time; and 55% endorsed reimbursement for expenses. Stressors for NDDs are analogous to those of directed donors; NDDs prefer having some information about the recipient and prefer to be given a choice regarding the timing for communication with the recipient. NDDs supported donation being financially neutral.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cheryl Jacobs
- Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | | | - Jennifer F Wiseman
- Department of Social Work, University of Minnesota Health, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Catherine Garvey
- Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Dawn B Larson
- Department of Social Work, University of Minnesota Health, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Margaret Voges
- University of Minnesota Health, Solid Organ Transplant, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | | | - Hassan N Ibrahim
- Division of Nephrology, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas
| | - Arthur J Matas
- Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Schaffhausen CR, Bruin MJ, McKinney WT, Snyder JJ, Matas AJ, Kasiske BL, Israni AK. How patients choose kidney transplant centers: A qualitative study of patient experiences. Clin Transplant 2019; 33:e13523. [PMID: 30861199 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.13523] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2018] [Revised: 02/12/2019] [Accepted: 02/22/2019] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Little is known about how patients make the critical decision of choosing a transplant center. In the United States, acceptance criteria, waiting times, and mortality vary significantly by geography and center. We sought to understand patients' experiences and perspectives when selecting transplant centers. We included 82 kidney transplant patients in 20 semi-structured interviews, nine focus groups with local candidates, and three focus groups with national recipients. Sites included two local transplant centers in Minneapolis, Minnesota, and national recipients from across the United States. Transcripts were analyzed by two researchers using a thematic analysis. Several themes emerged related to priorities and barriers when choosing a center. Patients were often unfamiliar with options, even with multiple local centers. Patients described being referred to a specific center by a trusted provider. Patients prioritized perceived reputation, comfort, and convenience. Insurance coverage was both a source of information and a barrier to options. Patients underestimated differences across centers and the effects on being waitlisted and receiving a transplant. Barriers in decision making included an overwhelming scope of information and difficulty locating information relevant to patients with unique medical needs. Informed decisions could be improved by the dissemination of understandable information better tailored to individual patient needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Marilyn J Bruin
- College of Design, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | | | - Jon J Snyder
- Department of Epidemiology and Community Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.,Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, Hennepin Healthcare Research Institute, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Arthur J Matas
- Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Bertram L Kasiske
- Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, Hennepin Healthcare Research Institute, Minneapolis, Minnesota.,Department of Medicine, Hennepin Healthcare, University of Minnesota (UMN), Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Ajay K Israni
- Department of Epidemiology and Community Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.,Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, Hennepin Healthcare Research Institute, Minneapolis, Minnesota.,Department of Medicine, Hennepin Healthcare, University of Minnesota (UMN), Minneapolis, Minnesota
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Odegard M, Serrano OK, Peterson K, Mongin SJ, Berglund D, Vock DM, Chinnakotla S, Dunn TB, Finger EB, Kandaswamy R, Pruett TL, Matas AJ. Delivery of transplant care among Hmong kidney transplant recipients: Outcomes from a single institution. Clin Transplant 2019; 33:e13539. [DOI: 10.1111/ctr.13539] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2018] [Revised: 02/26/2019] [Accepted: 03/11/2019] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Marjorie Odegard
- Division of Transplantation Department of Surgery Minneapolis Minnesota
| | - Oscar K. Serrano
- Division of Transplantation Department of Surgery Minneapolis Minnesota
| | - Kent Peterson
- Division of Transplantation Department of Surgery Minneapolis Minnesota
| | - Steven J. Mongin
- Biostatistical Design and Analysis Center Clinical and Translational Science Institute Minneapolis Minnesota
| | - Danielle Berglund
- Informatics Services for Research and Reporting, Fairview Minneapolis Minnesota
| | - David M. Vock
- Division of Biostatistics, School of Public Health University of Minnesota Minneapolis Minnesota
| | | | - Ty B. Dunn
- Division of Transplantation Department of Surgery Minneapolis Minnesota
| | - Erik B. Finger
- Division of Transplantation Department of Surgery Minneapolis Minnesota
| | - Raja Kandaswamy
- Division of Transplantation Department of Surgery Minneapolis Minnesota
| | - Timothy L. Pruett
- Division of Transplantation Department of Surgery Minneapolis Minnesota
| | - Arthur J. Matas
- Division of Transplantation Department of Surgery Minneapolis Minnesota
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Serrano OK, Matas AJ. Retransplant Outcomes Compared With First Kidney Transplants: Important Observations Not Reported in the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients Annual Report. EXP CLIN TRANSPLANT 2019; 18:48-52. [PMID: 30806202 DOI: 10.6002/ect.2018.0244] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Twice per year, the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients provides risk-adjusted center-specific reports of 1- and 3-year outcomes. In addition, the Registry reports 10-year aggregate survival outcomes for kidney transplant recipients. However, in this annual report, no distinction is made between outcomes of patients with a first transplant versus those with retransplants. MATERIALS AND METHODS We analyzed data from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients between 1992 and 2015 to determine outcomes after a 1st, 2nd, or ≥ 3rd kidney transplant. Recipients were stratified by donor source (living vs deceased) and transplant number, and rates of graft failure, death-censored graft failure, and death with functioning graft were determined. RESULTS From 1992 to 2015, rates of graft failure and death-censored graft failure at 6 months, 1 year, 3 years, 5 years, and 10 years decreased; however, long-term rates of death with functioning graft were unchanged. Outcomes for 1st and 2nd kidney transplant were better than outcomes for ≥ 3rd transplant. CONCLUSIONS It would be extremely valuable if the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients could present stratified analyses that would account for a host of factors, including organ sequence, which tend to vary by center. The presentation of risk-adjusted outcomes in the annual Registry report could include a more comprehensive assessment of program performance. Such information would be extremely useful for transplant centers, patients, and their support networks, organ procurement organizations, and other transplant stakeholders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oscar K Serrano
- From the Department of Surgery, Division of Transplantation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|