Mild-to-moderate obesity: implications for respiratory mechanics at rest and during exercise in young men

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effect of mild-to-moderate obesity on respiratory mechanics at rest and during exercise in obese men. We hypothesized that the simple mass loading of obesity would alter both end-expiratory lung volume (EELV) and respiratory pressures (gastric, P(ga) and transpulmonary, P(TP)) in resting body positions and during graded cycle ergometry to exhaustion.

SUBJECTS

A total of 10 obese (38+/-5% body fat; mean+/-s.d.) and nine lean (18+/-4%) men were studied.

METHODS

Body composition (by body circumferences and hydrostatic weighing) and pulmonary function were measured at rest. Breathing mechanics were measured at rest in the upright-seated position, supine, and during cycling exercise. Data were analyzed by independent t-test.

RESULTS

EELV was significantly lower in the obese men in the supine (30+/-4 vs 37+/-6% total lung capacity (TLC)) and seated (39+/-6 vs 47+/-5%TLC) positions and at ventilatory threshold (35+/-5 vs 45+/-7%TLC) (P<0.01). In contrast, at peak exercise, EELV was not different between groups. Respiratory pressures (P(ga) and P(TP)) were elevated (P<0.05) during one or more phases of the breathing cycle at rest and during exercise in obese men.

CONCLUSION

These data demonstrate that mild-to-moderate obesity in young men results in reduced lung volumes and alterations in respiratory mechanics when supine, seated at rest, and during exercise. During moderate exercise, obesity does not appear to limit changes in EELV; however, the regulation of EELV during heavy exercise appears to be affected.

Mild obesity does not limit change in end-expiratory lung volume during cycling in young women

To investigate the effects of obesity on the regulation of end-expiratory lung volume (EELV) during exercise we studied nine obese (41 +/- 6% body fat and 35 +/- 7 yr, mean +/- SD) and eight lean (18 +/- 3% body fat and 34 +/- 4 yr) women. We hypothesized that the simple mass loading of obesity would constrain the decrease in EELV in the supine position and during exercise. All subjects underwent respiratory mechanics measurements in the supine and seated positions, and during graded cycle ergometry to exhaustion. Data were analyzed between groups by independent t-test in the supine and seated postures, and during exercise at ventilatory threshold and peak. Total lung capacity (TLC) was reduced in the obese women (P < 0.05). EELV was significantly lower in the obese subjects in the supine (37 +/- 6 vs. 45 +/- 5% TLC) and seated (45 +/- 6 vs. 53 +/- 5% TLC) positions and at ventilatory threshold (41 +/- 4 vs. 49 +/- 5% TLC) (P < 0.01). In conclusion, despite reduced resting lung volumes and alterations in respiratory mechanics during exercise, mild obesity in women does not appear to constrain EELV during cycling nor does it limit exercise capacity. Also, these data suggest that other nonmechanical factors also regulate the level of EELV during exercise.