1
|
McCauley ST, Irwin C, Traube B, Khan MK, Sadeghi A, Stea B, Hamilton RJ, Walker GV. Burnout Rates in Clinical Radiation Oncology and Variations across Professional Subgroups. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 117:e533-e534. [PMID: 37785653 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.06.1818] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S) Physician and medical professional burnout has emerged as an important issue in clinical medicine and has been shown to negatively affect patient outcomes. The aim of this study is to determine how rates of burnout vary between different radiation oncology professional subgroups. MATERIALS/METHODS Participants were selected from those employed in one of the professional subgroups (radiation therapists, nurses, physicists, dosimetrists, and physicians) at two institutions that cover a total of seven sites. 126 individuals were recruited to participate. In addition to demographics, participants were asked to respond to questions regarding professional burnout utilizing the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI). Responses were on a seven-point Likert scale with subcategories of Exhaustion, Depersonalization, and Personal Achievement. Each participant's score per subcategory was categorized as either low, moderate, or high. For our primary outcome, frequencies and proportions were reported and Fisher's Exact Test was used to evaluate whether there was a statistically significant difference in proportions in categorized burnout scores across professional subgroups. Secondary analyses were performed comparing burnout across sex, age, and categorized years in position. An alpha level of 0.05 was used for all analyses. RESULTS In total, 55 participants responded to the survey: 12 nurses, 8 dosimetrists, 12 physicians, 5 physicists, and 18 radiation therapists for a response rate of 43.6%. Demographics were consistent across professional subgroups with the exception of participant sex (p = .0397), which had a greater proportion of females (72.22%) in the Radiation Therapist subgroup. Among the three subcategories, only Exhaustion had a significant difference between groups (p = .0494) with Dosimetrists (62.50%) and Physicists (40.00%) experiencing the highest level of burnout. For Depersonalization, at least one individual in each subgroup identified high burnout with higher rates among the Dosimetrists (25.00%) and Physicists (40.00%). Similarly, at least one person in each subgroup reported high burnout in Personal Achievement, but the highest response was among Dosimetrists (37.50%). In total, at least 12.75% of participants reported high burnout in at least one subcategory. No statistically significant differences in burnout were detected in our secondary analyses across sex, age, and years in position. CONCLUSION Our study showed that burnout rates are moderate in members of the radiation oncology team, with dosimetrists and physicists displaying the highest levels of burnout. In order to better estimate professional burnout, larger studies should be conducted to determine causes of burnout. Furthermore, wellness programs should be encouraged and incentivized to help reduce burnout and improve workplace morale, occupational fulfillment, and effective patient care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S T McCauley
- University of Arizona College of Medicine Phoenix, Phoenix, AZ
| | - C Irwin
- University of Arizona College of Medicine Phoenix, Phoenix, AZ
| | - B Traube
- University of Arizona College of Medicine Phoenix, Phoenix, AZ
| | - M K Khan
- BC Cancer Agency, Surrey, BC, Canada
| | - A Sadeghi
- Banner MD Anderson Cancer Center, Gilbert, AZ
| | - B Stea
- University of Arizona, Department of Radiation Oncology, Tucson, AZ
| | - R J Hamilton
- University of Arizona, Department of Radiation Oncology, Tucson, AZ
| | - G V Walker
- Banner MD Anderson Cancer Center, Gilbert, AZ
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Mapp JE, McDougall RP, Robbins JR, Hsu CC, Stea B, Morrison C. Outcomes of a Single Isocenter Brain Multi-Metastases Linear Accelerator Delivered Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SRS). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 117:e135. [PMID: 37784700 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.06.940] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S) The management of brain metastases has evolved from using 2D whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) to more complex techniques like stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for patients with limited disease. Long-term control of lesions is challenging with WBRT techniques but treating multiple lesions with traditional SRS, where each lesion is treated on its own isocenter, can be time-consuming and difficult on patients, especially those with claustrophobia. Single Isocenter Multiple Metastases (SIMM) SRS has emerged as an option to deliver ablative SRS doses simultaneously to multiple brain metastases using a single isocenter, thereby limiting the duration of treatments for patients. Though appealing, SIMM SRS adds technical complexity and could potentially lead to worse outcomes or more complications relative to traditional SRS treatments. Given the current paucity of clinical evidence supporting SIMM SRS, we sought to retrospectively review our institution's outcomes and complications for patients treated with SIMM SRS to determine the efficacy and safety of this approach in our hands. MATERIALS/METHODS Patients treated at our institution with SIMM SRS with at least one post-treatment brain MRI were identified. Date on patient clinical characteristics, planning, and treatment characteristics, and outcomes were retrospectively collected. Post-treatment tumor control was evaluated with follow-up MRI imaging based on RANO criteria. Correlation between tumor control and toxicity was done by assessing radiation doses, PTV coverage, and normal brain V12 constraints. RESULTS A total of 27 patients received SIMM SRS from January 2015 to February 2022. The median age at first SIMM SRS was 61 (range: 38-87). The most common disease sites were lung (63.0%), breast (18.5%), and GI (7.4%). The 27 patients had 47 SIMM SRS treatments of 163 lesions total. The median number of lesions treated per isocenter was 3 (range: 2-9). 5 patients had 2 SIMM SRS isocenters treated on the same day, treating clusters of lesions (ranging from 5-11 lesions treated on that day). The most common locations involved were frontal, cerebellar, and parietal lobes (32.52%, 21.47%, and 15.34%). The modal dose was 22 Gy (range: 18-24 Gy). Median OS from initial primary diagnosis was 23.23 months, and 9.92 months after the first SIMM SRS treatment. The median imaging follow-up was 9.8 months per lesion, and the local control rate was 95.03%. 2 lesions (1.23%) developed radiation necrosis and the median time to RT necrosis among those lesions was 5.7 months after treatment. CONCLUSION The utilization of SIMM SRS demonstrates acceptable efficacy and safety as it has been implemented at our institution. Further studies to evaluate this planning modality are warranted to establish suitable candidates for SIMM SRS as well as evaluate the long-term outcomes for these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J E Mapp
- Radiation Oncology, University of Arizona, College of Medicine-Tucson, Tucson, AZ
| | | | - J R Robbins
- University of Arizona, Department of Radiation Oncology, Tucson, AZ
| | - C C Hsu
- University of Arizona - Department of Radiation Oncology, Tucson, AZ
| | - B Stea
- University of Arizona, Department of Radiation Oncology, Tucson, AZ
| | - C Morrison
- University of Arizona - Department of Radiation Oncology, Tucson, AZ
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Heal C, Hsu C, Ho Q, Dougherty S, Ansinelli H, Morrison C, Gay C, Xing J, Nguyen S, Gonzalez V, Stea B, Robbins J. Technology Usage and Impacts by COVID-19 among Patients in a Radiation Oncology Clinic. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2022. [PMCID: PMC9595464 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.07.919] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Purpose/Objective(s) Mobile devices provide platforms for consistent and real time symptom tracking for cancer patients, allowing for better symptom reporting and more timely interventions. There is limited research investigating barriers to adoption within the oncology setting and COVID-19 impacts on patent willingness to use health technology. Understanding these issues is key to successful development and implementation. We designed a survey to assess patient willingness and barriers to using mobile devices to report/track symptoms (e-report). Materials/Methods Two cohorts of adult patients completed a 21-question anonymized survey. The survey was administered to clinic patients before (PRE) and 18mo after (POST) the start of the COVID pandemic. Three additional questions were added to POST survey to investigate impacts from COVID. Demographics, technology usage, willingness to report data, barriers to utilization, and changes due to COVID were evaluated using descriptive statistics. Predictors of willingness to e-report, barriers to use, and changes due to the COVID-19 pandemic were analyzed using univariate and multivariate logistic regression (MVA). Results 318 patients completed the survey (PRE= 144 patients; POST= 174 patients) with mean age 65y, 75% Caucasian, 55% male. Altogether, 75% used a smart phone (PRE=66.7%; POST=81.3%; p 0.003), 90% reported home internet access (PRE=87.5%; POST=91.4%; p 0.259), 86% used a computer (PRE=79.2%; POST=90.8%; p 0.004), and 26% used a wearable health tracker (PRE 25.7%; POST 26.4%; p 0.881). On MVA, age>65 (OR 0.32; p 0.001), annual income>50K (OR 2.16; p 0.032), smart phone ownership (OR 4.07; p 0.000), and new/current patient status (OR 2.15; p 0.020) were all significant factors impacting willingness to e- report. Limited tech literacy (p 0.024) and time commitment (p 0.048) were the only significant barriers. Privacy as a barrier was greater in PRE vs POST cohort (OR 2.3 vs OR 1.1) trending toward significance. Nearly all modes of tech usage were greater in POST vs PRE cohort. POST cohort was significantly more willing to e- report (81.1% vs 69.1%; OR 1.91; p 0.016). This remained significant on MVA after adjusting for age, concern for privacy, tech literacy, and patient status (OR 1.88; p 0.026). Furthermore, 51% of POST cohort reported the pandemic directly influenced their willingness to e-report (40% more, 11% less). Conclusion Radiation oncology patients are willing to use mobile technology to report symptoms. Willingness increases with decreasing age, increasing annual income, smartphone ownership, and new/current patient status. Significant barriers include tech literacy and time commitment. Post-pandemic patients are more willing to e-report and list fewer barriers. The COVID-19 pandemic appears to have had a positive impact on technology usage by patients. Efforts to develop and test mobile applications for this population are justified.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C. Heal
- University of Arizona - Department of Radiation Oncology, Tucson, AZ,Corresponding author
| | - C.C. Hsu
- University of Arizona - Department of Radiation Oncology, Tucson, AZ
| | - Q.A. Ho
- University of Arizona - Department of Radiation Oncology, Tucson, AZ
| | - S.T. Dougherty
- University of Arizona - Department of Radiation Oncology, Tucson, AZ
| | - H. Ansinelli
- University of Arizona - Department of Radiation Oncology, Tucson, AZ
| | - C. Morrison
- University of Arizona - Department of Radiation Oncology, Tucson, AZ
| | - C. Gay
- University of Arizona - Department of Radiation Oncology, Tucson, AZ
| | - J.L. Xing
- University of Arizona, Department of Radiation Oncology, Tucson, AZ
| | - S. Nguyen
- University of Arizona - Department of Radiation Oncology, Tucson, AZ
| | - V.J. Gonzalez
- University of Arizona - Department of Radiation Oncology, Tucson, AZ
| | - B. Stea
- University of Arizona - Department of Radiation Oncology, Tucson, AZ
| | - J.R. Robbins
- University of Arizona, Department of Radiation Oncology, Tucson, AZ
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Xing J, Locke A, Hamilton R, Stea B, Robbins J. A Dosimetric Analysis of Single Fraction Lattice Radiotherapy as a Boost for the Palliative Treatment of Bulky Head and Neck Tumors. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.07.1675] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
5
|
Garcia A, Locke A, Smith L, Hamilton R, Stea B. Robust Planning Optimization Improves Safety and Homogeneity for Craniospinal Irradiation in the Supine Position. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.07.826] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
|
6
|
Famoso J, Grow J, Laughlin B, Katsanis E, Stea B. Long-Term Outcomes of Adult Patients with High-Risk Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Undergoing Total Body Irradiation with or without Whole Brain Boost. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2018. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.07.836] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
|
7
|
Binks J, Lemole G, Stea B. Re-Irradiation of Trigeminal Neuralgia with LINAC-Based Stereotactic Radiosurgery. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2018. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.07.1254] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
|
8
|
Skrepnik T, Goldbaum D, Suszko J, Famoso J, Hurley J, Binks J, Stea B, Huynh J. Does Immunotherapy Influence the Risk of Developing Radiation Necrosis After Radiosurgery of Brain Metastases? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2017. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.06.369] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
9
|
Skrepnik T, Becker J, Famoso J, Suszko J, Stea B. Long-Term Blood Brain Barrier Permeability Changes After Radiosurgery and Immunotherapy for Melanoma Brain Metastases. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2017. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.06.853] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
10
|
Gadaleta C, Coviello M, Catino A, Venneri MT, Stea B, Quaranta M, Mattioli V, Ranieri G. Serum Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Concentrations in Hepatocellular Cancer Patients Undergoing Percutaneously Radiofrequency Thermal Ablation. J Chemother 2016; 16 Suppl 5:7-10. [PMID: 15675467 DOI: 10.1080/1120009x.2004.11782373] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is known to play a central role in tumour angiogenesis. However, no data have been published with regard to the clinical-biological significance of serum (S)-VEGF in hepatocellular cancer (HCC) patients undergoing to percutaneously radiofrequency thermal ablation (PRFA). The aim of this study was to assess the modifications of S-VEGF levels in a series of 28 HCC patients in hepatitis C virus-positive cirrhosis before and after PRFA, respectively. Samples of S were taken before, 2 and 5 days after PRFA respectively and VEGF levels were assessed by ELISA. No significant difference was found between pre- and post-VEGF levels (p= n.s.; by Wilcoxon test). We suggest that S-VEGF level is not useful as early predictive marker of response to PRFA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Gadaleta
- Department of Critical Area and Surgery, National Cancer Institute of Bari, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Skrepnik T, Brookshier A, Romagnolo A, Cui H, Stea B. Increased Control of Melanoma Brain Metastases after Stereotactic Radiosurgery as a Function of Timing of Immunotherapy Infusion. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2016. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2016.06.449] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
12
|
Grow J, Stea B, Katsanis E. Treatment of Pediatric CNS Leukemia With Cranial or Craniospinal Boost in Conjunction With Total Body Irradiation as Part of the Conditioning Regimen for Bone Marrow Transplantation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2016. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2016.06.418] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
13
|
Cheung M, Kim Y, Sckolnik S, Grow J, Slane B, Gordon J, Stea B. Acute Skin Toxicity Using High-Dose-Rate Electronic Brachytherapy for Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2014. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.05.2190] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
|
14
|
Sckolnik S, Jeffrey K, Stea B. Frameless LINAC Image Guided Radiosurgery for Primary and Recurrent Trigeminal Neuralgia. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2014. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.05.2008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
|
15
|
Stea B, Schindler R, Joffe L, Hamilton R, Lutz W, Gordon J, Georgiev G, Senner G, Marstellar L. Minimally Invasive Retrobulbar Episcleral Brachytherapy for Treatment of Wet Age-related Macular Degeneration: Preliminary Results of a Feasibility Study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2012. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.07.1669] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
16
|
Szeja S, Desai A, Guillen-R J, Stea B. Frameless Hypofractionated Stereotactic Radiation Therapy for Brain Metastases. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2012. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.07.787] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
|
17
|
Furuse M, Miyatake SI, Miyata T, Yoritsune E, Kawabata S, Kuroiwa T, Karajannis MA, Fisher MJ, Milla SS, Cohen KJ, Legault G, Wisoff JH, Harter DH, Hartnett E, Merkelson A, Bloom MC, Dhall G, Jones D, Korshunov A, Pfister S, Eberhart CG, Zagzag D, Allen JC, Chinot O, Wick W, Mason W, Henriksson R, Saran F, Nishikawa R, Hilton M, Abrey L, Cloughesy T, Field KM, Simes J, Nowak AK, Hovey E, Wheeler H, Cher L, Brown C, Livingstone A, Sawkins K, Rosenthal MA, McCrea HJ, Kesavabhotla K, Boockvar J, Kleinberg L, Blakeley J, Mikkelsen T, Stevens G, Ye X, Ryu S, Desideri S, Desai B, Giranda V, Grossman S, Badruddoja MA, Pazzi M, Stea B, Lefferts P, Contreras N, Wallen K, Shah R, Rance N, Schroeder K, Sanan A, Kut C, Raza S, Liang W, Abutaleb A, Xi J, Mavadia J, Ye X, Guerrero-Cazares H, McVeigh E, Li X, Quinones-Hinojosa A, Sloan AE, Reese J, Rogers LR, Embree H, Lazarus HM, Fung H, Kane D, Dropulic B, Gerson SL, Tsung GE, Green SD, Lai A, Green RM, Filka E, Cloughesy TF, Nghiemphu PL, Saito R, Yamashita Y, Sonoda Y, Kanamori M, Kumabe T, Tominaga T, Mohammadi AM, Chao ST, Peereboom DM, Barnett GH, Suh JH, Brewer C, Vogelbaum MA, Desjardins A, Peters KB, Herndon JE, Bailey LA, Alderson LM, Ranjan T, Sampson JH, Friedman AH, Bigner DD, Friedman HS, Vredenburgh JJ, Kaley TJ, Pentsova E, Omuro A, Mellinghoff I, Nolan C, Gavrilovic I, DeAngelis LM, Holland E, Lacouture ME, Ludwig E, Lassman AB, Shih KC, Bacha J, Brown DM, Garner WJ, Schwartz R, Burris HA, Shih K, Rosenblatt P, Chowdhary S, Weir A, Shepard G, Shastry M, Griner P, Hainsworth J, Sloan AE, Nock CJ, Kerstetter A, Supko J, Ye X, Barnholtz-Sloan JS, Miller R, Rich J, Takebe N, Prados M, Grossman S. CLIN-ONGOING CLINICAL TRIALS. Neuro Oncol 2012; 14:vi101-vi105. [PMCID: PMC3488786 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/nos232] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/24/2023] Open
|
18
|
Welsh J, Kim E, Amini A, Allen P, Chang J, Komaki R, Nguyen N, Holt J, Erdman D, Stea B. Phase II Study of Erlotinib with Concurrent Whole-brain Radiation Therapy for Patients with Brain Metastases from Non-small Cell Lung Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2011. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.06.280] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/15/2022]
|
19
|
Welsh J, Amini A, Kim ES, Allen P, Chang JY, Garland LL, Holt J, Erdman D, Komaki R, Stea B. Phase II study of erlotinib with concurrent whole-brain radiation therapy for patients with brain metastases from non-small cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 2011. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2011.29.15_suppl.2031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
|
20
|
Clarke JL, Ennis MM, Lamborn KR, Prados MD, Puduvalli VK, Penas-Prado M, Gilbert MR, Groves MD, Hess KR, Levin VA, de Groot J, Colman H, Conrad CA, Loghin ME, Hunter K, Yung WK, Chen C, Damek D, Liu A, Gaspar LE, Waziri A, Lillehei K, Kavanagh B, Finlay JL, Haley K, Dhall G, Gardner S, Allen J, Cornelius A, Olshefski R, Garvin J, Pradhan K, Etzl M, Goldman S, Atlas M, Thompson S, Hirt A, Hukin J, Comito M, Bertolone S, Torkildson J, Joyce M, Moertel C, Letterio J, Kennedy G, Walter A, Ji L, Sposto R, Dorris K, Wagner L, Hummel T, Drissi R, Miles L, Leach J, Chow L, Turner R, Gragert MN, Pruitt D, Sutton M, Breneman J, Crone K, Fouladi M, Friday BB, Buckner J, Anderson SK, Giannini C, Kugler J, Mazurczac M, Flynn P, Gross H, Pajon E, Jaeckle K, Galanis E, Badruddoja MA, Pazzi MA, Stea B, Lefferts P, Contreras N, Bishop M, Seeger J, Carmody R, Rance N, Marsella M, Schroeder K, Sanan A, Swinnen LJ, Rankin C, Rushing EJ, Hutchins LF, Damek DM, Barger GR, Norden AD, Lesser G, Hammond SN, Drappatz J, Fadul CE, Batchelor TT, Quant EC, Beroukhim R, Ciampa A, Doherty L, LaFrankie D, Ruland S, Bochacki C, Phan P, Faroh E, McNamara B, David K, Rosenfeld MR, Wen PY, Hammond SN, Norden AD, Drappatz J, Phuphanich S, Reardon D, Wong ET, Plotkin SR, Lesser G, Mintz A, Raizer JJ, Batchelor TT, Quant EC, Beroukhim R, Kaley TJ, Ciampa A, Doherty L, LaFrankie D, Ruland S, Smith KH, Wen PY, Chamberlain MC, Graham C, Mrugala M, Johnston S, Kreisl TN, Smith P, Iwamoto F, Sul J, Butman JA, Fine HA, Westphal M, Heese O, Warmuth-Metz M, Pietsch T, Schlegel U, Tonn JC, Schramm J, Schackert G, Melms A, Mehdorn HM, Seifert V, Geletneky K, Reuter D, Bach F, Khasraw M, Abrey LE, Lassman AB, Hormigo A, Nolan C, Gavrilovic IT, Mellinghoff IK, Reiner AS, DeAngelis L, Omuro AM, Burzynski SR, Weaver RA, Janicki TJ, Burzynski GS, Szymkowski B, Acelar SS, Mechtler LL, O'Connor PC, Kroon HA, Vora T, Kurkure P, Arora B, Gupta T, Dhamankar V, Banavali S, Moiyadi A, Epari S, Merchant N, Jalali R, Moller S, Grunnet K, Hansen S, Schultz H, Holmberg M, Sorensen MM, Poulsen HS, Lassen U, Reardon DA, Vredenburgh JJ, Desjardins A, Janney DE, Peters K, Sampson J, Gururangan S, Friedman HS, Jeyapalan S, Constantinou M, Evans D, Elinzano H, O'Connor B, Puthawala MY, Goldman M, Oyelese A, Cielo D, Dipetrillo T, Safran H, Anan M, Seyed Sadr M, Alshami J, Sabau C, Seyed Sadr E, Siu V, Guiot MC, Samani A, Del Maestro R, Bogdahn U, Stockhammer G, Mahapatra AK, Venkataramana NK, Oliushine VE, Parfenov VE, Poverennova IE, Hau P, Jachimczak P, Heinrichs H, Schlingensiepen KH, Shibui S, Kayama T, Wakabayashi T, Nishikawa R, de Groot M, Aronica E, Vecht CJ, Toering ST, Heimans JJ, Reijneveld JC, Batchelor T, Mulholland P, Neyns B, Nabors LB, Campone M, Wick A, Mason W, Mikkelsen T, Phuphanich S, Ashby LS, DeGroot JF, Gattamaneni HR, Cher LM, Rosenthal MA, Payer F, Xu J, Liu Q, van den Bent M, Nabors B, Fink K, Mikkelsen T, Chan M, Trusheim J, Raval S, Hicking C, Henslee-Downey J, Picard M, Reardon D, Kaley TJ, Wen PY, Schiff D, Karimi S, DeAngelis LM, Nolan CP, Omuro A, Gavrilovic I, Norden A, Drappatz J, Purow BW, Lieberman FS, Hariharan S, Abrey LE, Lassman AB, Perez-Larraya JG, Honnorat J, Chinot O, Catry-Thomas I, Taillandier L, Guillamo JS, Campello C, Monjour A, Tanguy ML, Delattre JY, Franz DN, Krueger DA, Care MM, Holland-Bouley K, Agricola K, Tudor C, Mangeshkar P, Byars AW, Sahmoud T, Alonso-Basanta M, Lustig RA, Dorsey JF, Lai RK, Recht LD, Reardon DA, Paleologos N, Groves M, Rosenfeld MR, Meech S, Davis T, Pavlov D, Marshall MA, Sampson J, Slot M, Peerdeman SM, Beauchesne PD, Faure G, Noel G, Schmitt T, Kerr C, Jadaud E, Martin L, Taillandier L, Carnin C, Desjardins A, Reardon DA, Peters KB, Herndon JE, Kirkpatrick JP, Friedman HS, Vredenburgh JJ, Nayak L, Panageas KS, Deangelis LM, Abrey LE, Lassman AB. Ongoing Clinical Trials. Neuro Oncol 2010. [DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noq116.s9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|
21
|
Ewell L, Bhullar A, Stea B. SU-GG-I-150: Voxel Location Dependence of Brain Metabolites as Determined by Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy. Med Phys 2010. [DOI: 10.1118/1.3468186] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
|
22
|
Badruddoja MA, Pazzi M, Stea B, Kuzma KM, Bishop MC, Carmody R, Schroeder K, Seeger J, Marsella M, Sanan A. Phase II study of biweekly temozolomide plus bevacizumab for adult patients with recurrent glioblastoma multiforme. J Clin Oncol 2010. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2010.28.15_suppl.e12554] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
|
23
|
Bruno M, Digennaro M, Tommasi S, Stea B, Danese T, Schittulli F, Paradiso A. Attitude towards genetic testing for breast cancer susceptibility: a comparison of affected and unaffected women. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2009; 19:360-8. [PMID: 19912305 DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2354.2009.01067.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
The objective of this study is to evaluate women's awareness and interest in genetic testing for breast cancer risk, to identify socio-demographic factors, to analyse the reasons for wanting or not wanting to be tested and finally to determine whether breast cancer patients and healthy women have different attitudes towards genetic testing. Consecutive series of 879 women without and with breast cancer participated in a 20-item self-completing questionnaire. Among breast cancer patients, 57% answered that they would definitely or probably accept being tested, compared with 84% of women without breast cancer. At the multiple logistic regression analysis only to have a diagnosis of breast cancer conditioned significantly the interest to have genetic testing. Surprisingly, a family history of breast cancer was found to have no significant impact. The most frequently cited reason for being interested in genetic testing was 'to learn about your children's risk'. Although women's awareness about breast cancer genes is inadequate, the interest in genetic testing is substantial and higher both in healthy women and in women with breast cancer. These results provide important indications for the development of educational strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Bruno
- Experimental Oncology Department, Cancer Institute of Bari, Bari, Italy.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Wharton K, Stea B, Thomas L, Gruessner A. Fractionated Stereotactic Radiotherapy of Paraspinal Tumors. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2009. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.07.572] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
|
25
|
Ellsworth R, Welsh J, Mahadevan D, Bearrs D, Hsieh D, Fjerstad K, Marsella M, Sanan A, Badrudojja M, Stea B. The Radiosensitizing Effects of a Novel Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor, Mp470 in Glioblastoma Multiforme Stem Cells. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2008. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.06.551] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
26
|
Suh J, Stea B, Tankel K, Marsiglia H, Belkacemi Y, Gomez H, Falcone-Lizaraso S, May J, Saunders M. Results of the Phase III ENRICH (RT-016) Study of Efaproxiral Administered Concurrent with Whole Brain Radiation Therapy (WBRT) in Women with Brain Metastases from Breast Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2008. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.06.880] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
|
27
|
Brandi M, Petroni S, Stea B, D'Amico C, Necchia R, Altieri R, Schittulli F. Randomized study testing as adjuvant chemotherapy the same primary (neoadjuvant) epirubicin/vinorelbine (EN) regimen versus docetaxel (TXT) in inflammatory breast cancer (IBC). J Clin Oncol 2008. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2008.26.15_suppl.590] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
|
28
|
Welsh J, Mahadevan D, Bearss D, Stea B. Sensitization of a Glioblastoma Multiforme (GBM) Cell Line by MP470: A Novel c-Met Antagonist. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2007. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.07.183] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
29
|
Kumar R, Welsh J, Nagle R, Green S, Stea B. Association between Rad-51 Levels and Survival in Patients With Glioblastoma Multiforme Treated With Radiation Therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2007. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.07.117] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
30
|
|
31
|
Metz J, Smith D, Mick R, Lustig R, Stea B, Mitchell J, Cherakuri M, Glatstein E, Hahn S. 2588. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2006. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.07.1001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
|
32
|
Welsh J, Mahadevan D, Dougherty G, Stea B. 532 POSTER c-MET inhbition radiosensitizes melanoma by inhibiting double strand DNA repair. EJC Suppl 2006. [DOI: 10.1016/s1359-6349(06)70537-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
|
33
|
Choy H, Swann S, Nabid A, Stea B, Roa W, Souhami L, Curran W. 49. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2006. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.07.1348] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
|
34
|
Stea B, Shaw E, Pintér T, Hackman J, Craig M, May J, Steffen RP, Suh JH. Efaproxiral red blood cell concentration predicts efficacy in patients with brain metastases. Br J Cancer 2006; 94:1777-84. [PMID: 16773073 PMCID: PMC2361352 DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603169] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Efaproxiral (Efaproxyn™, RSR13), a synthetic allosteric modifier of haemoglobin (Hb), decreases Hb-oxygen (O2) binding affinity and enhances oxygenation of hypoxic tumours during radiation therapy. This analysis evaluated the Phase 3, Radiation Enhancing Allosteric Compound for Hypoxic Brain Metastases; RT-009 (REACH) study efficacy results in relation to efaproxiral exposure (efaproxiral red blood cell concentration (E-RBC) and number of doses). Recursive partitioning analysis Class I or II patients with brain metastases from solid tumours received standard whole-brain radiation therapy (3 Gy/fraction × 10 days), plus supplemental O2 (4 l/min), either with efaproxiral (75 or 100 mg/kg daily) or without (control). Efaproxiral red blood cell concentrations were linearly extrapolated to all efaproxiral doses received. Three patient populations were analysed: (1) all eligible, (2) non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) as primary cancer, and (3) breast cancer primary. Efficacy endpoints were survival and response rate. Brain metastases patients achieving sufficient E-RBC (⩾483 μg/ml) and receiving at least seven of 10 efaproxiral doses were most likely to experience survival and response benefits. Patients with breast cancer primary tumours generally achieved the target efaproxiral exposure and therefore gained greater benefit from efaproxiral treatment than NSCLC patients. This analysis defined the efaproxiral concentration-dependence in survival and response rate improvement, and provided a clearer understanding of efaproxiral dosing requirements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B Stea
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Arizona Health Sciences Center, Tucson, 85724, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Bruno M, Tommasi S, Stea B, Quaranta M, Schittulli F, Mastropasqua A, Distante A, Di Paola L, Paradiso A. Awareness of breast cancer genetics and interest in predictive genetic testing: a survey of a southern Italian population. Ann Oncol 2005; 15 Suppl 1:I48-I54. [PMID: 15280188 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdh658] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Before starting a molecular screening program for breast cancer risk and in order to develop ad hoc educational strategies, a population survey in Apulia, Italy, was performed to gather information on women's awareness of breast cancer genetics and their attitude toward genetic testing for breast cancer risk. PATIENTS AND METHODS A consecutive series of 677 healthy women with or without a family history of breast cancer, who attended the outpatient clinics of Lega Italiana per la Lotta contro i Tumori in Bari, Italy, for preventive visits, were asked to complete a 20-item questionnaire on socio-demographics, risk perception, psychological characteristics and interest in genetic testing for breast cancer predisposing genes. RESULTS Most women (77%) reported knowing something about the genetics of breast cancer; only 7% of the women were not interested at all in genetic testing. These figures were not significantly different for women with or without a family history of breast cancer. The two most frequently cited reasons for being interested in genetic testing, accounting for more than 50% of collected responses, were 'to learn about your children's risk' and 'to help advance research'. On multiple logistic regression analysis, only older age [odds ratio (OR) 1.9; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.3-2.9] was associated with women's knowledge of genetic testing. Moreover, marital status (OR 4.0; 95% CI 1.1-14.6) and thinking of cancer (OR 2.2; 95% CI 1.0-4.7) independently predicted the interest in having genetic testing. CONCLUSIONS Southern Italian women seem highly interested in genetic testing for breast cancer risk. However, their expectations mainly regard their concerns about their children or their altruistic need to help research rather than the idea of a direct clinical benefit. The great interest of the women in genetic testing probably reflects their inappropriate knowledge of the information that genetic testing can provide for breast cancer risk analysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Bruno
- National Cancer Institute, Bari, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Gabayan A, Sanan A, Bastin K, Burri S, Green S, Jenrette J, Lustig R, Papagikos M, Patel A, Schultz C, Watson G, Stea B. Gliasite radiotherapy system for treatment of recurrent malignant glioma: A multi-institutional analysis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2004. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.07.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
37
|
Suh J, Stea B, Nabid A, Kresl J, Fortin A, Mercier JP, Senzer N, Chang E, Holz JB, Shaw E. Standard whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) with supplemental oxygen (O 2), with or without RSR13 (efaproxiral)in patients with brain metastases: Results of the randomized REACH (RT-009) study. J Clin Oncol 2004. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2004.22.90140.1534] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- J. Suh
- Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH; University of Arizona Health Sciences Center, Tuscon, AZ; Centre Hospitalier Universitarie de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, PQ, Canada; Foundation for Cancer Research and Education, Phoenix, AZ; Hotel-Dieu de Quebec du CHUQ, Quebec City, PQ, Canada; Hopital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, Montreal, PQ, Canada; US Oncology Research, Inc, Dallas, TX; University of Texas, M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Allos Therapeutics, Inc, Westminster, CO; Wake Forest University School of
| | - B. Stea
- Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH; University of Arizona Health Sciences Center, Tuscon, AZ; Centre Hospitalier Universitarie de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, PQ, Canada; Foundation for Cancer Research and Education, Phoenix, AZ; Hotel-Dieu de Quebec du CHUQ, Quebec City, PQ, Canada; Hopital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, Montreal, PQ, Canada; US Oncology Research, Inc, Dallas, TX; University of Texas, M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Allos Therapeutics, Inc, Westminster, CO; Wake Forest University School of
| | - A. Nabid
- Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH; University of Arizona Health Sciences Center, Tuscon, AZ; Centre Hospitalier Universitarie de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, PQ, Canada; Foundation for Cancer Research and Education, Phoenix, AZ; Hotel-Dieu de Quebec du CHUQ, Quebec City, PQ, Canada; Hopital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, Montreal, PQ, Canada; US Oncology Research, Inc, Dallas, TX; University of Texas, M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Allos Therapeutics, Inc, Westminster, CO; Wake Forest University School of
| | - J. Kresl
- Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH; University of Arizona Health Sciences Center, Tuscon, AZ; Centre Hospitalier Universitarie de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, PQ, Canada; Foundation for Cancer Research and Education, Phoenix, AZ; Hotel-Dieu de Quebec du CHUQ, Quebec City, PQ, Canada; Hopital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, Montreal, PQ, Canada; US Oncology Research, Inc, Dallas, TX; University of Texas, M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Allos Therapeutics, Inc, Westminster, CO; Wake Forest University School of
| | - A. Fortin
- Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH; University of Arizona Health Sciences Center, Tuscon, AZ; Centre Hospitalier Universitarie de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, PQ, Canada; Foundation for Cancer Research and Education, Phoenix, AZ; Hotel-Dieu de Quebec du CHUQ, Quebec City, PQ, Canada; Hopital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, Montreal, PQ, Canada; US Oncology Research, Inc, Dallas, TX; University of Texas, M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Allos Therapeutics, Inc, Westminster, CO; Wake Forest University School of
| | - J. P. Mercier
- Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH; University of Arizona Health Sciences Center, Tuscon, AZ; Centre Hospitalier Universitarie de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, PQ, Canada; Foundation for Cancer Research and Education, Phoenix, AZ; Hotel-Dieu de Quebec du CHUQ, Quebec City, PQ, Canada; Hopital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, Montreal, PQ, Canada; US Oncology Research, Inc, Dallas, TX; University of Texas, M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Allos Therapeutics, Inc, Westminster, CO; Wake Forest University School of
| | - N. Senzer
- Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH; University of Arizona Health Sciences Center, Tuscon, AZ; Centre Hospitalier Universitarie de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, PQ, Canada; Foundation for Cancer Research and Education, Phoenix, AZ; Hotel-Dieu de Quebec du CHUQ, Quebec City, PQ, Canada; Hopital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, Montreal, PQ, Canada; US Oncology Research, Inc, Dallas, TX; University of Texas, M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Allos Therapeutics, Inc, Westminster, CO; Wake Forest University School of
| | - E. Chang
- Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH; University of Arizona Health Sciences Center, Tuscon, AZ; Centre Hospitalier Universitarie de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, PQ, Canada; Foundation for Cancer Research and Education, Phoenix, AZ; Hotel-Dieu de Quebec du CHUQ, Quebec City, PQ, Canada; Hopital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, Montreal, PQ, Canada; US Oncology Research, Inc, Dallas, TX; University of Texas, M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Allos Therapeutics, Inc, Westminster, CO; Wake Forest University School of
| | - J. B. Holz
- Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH; University of Arizona Health Sciences Center, Tuscon, AZ; Centre Hospitalier Universitarie de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, PQ, Canada; Foundation for Cancer Research and Education, Phoenix, AZ; Hotel-Dieu de Quebec du CHUQ, Quebec City, PQ, Canada; Hopital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, Montreal, PQ, Canada; US Oncology Research, Inc, Dallas, TX; University of Texas, M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Allos Therapeutics, Inc, Westminster, CO; Wake Forest University School of
| | - E. Shaw
- Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH; University of Arizona Health Sciences Center, Tuscon, AZ; Centre Hospitalier Universitarie de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, PQ, Canada; Foundation for Cancer Research and Education, Phoenix, AZ; Hotel-Dieu de Quebec du CHUQ, Quebec City, PQ, Canada; Hopital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, Montreal, PQ, Canada; US Oncology Research, Inc, Dallas, TX; University of Texas, M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Allos Therapeutics, Inc, Westminster, CO; Wake Forest University School of
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Shaw E, Stea B, Pinter T, Hammoud Y, Cagnoni PJ, Hackman J, Boyd A, Craig M, Marks J, Suh J. Pharmacokinetics (PK) of RSR13 (efaproxiral) predict survival in patients with brain metastases randomized to receive whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) with or without RSR13 (REACH RT-009). J Clin Oncol 2004. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2004.22.90140.1561] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- E. Shaw
- Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC; University of Arizona Health, Tucson, AZ; Petz Aladar Hospital of Gyor-Moson, Gyor, Hungary; Hopital de Montbéliard, Montbéliard, France; Allos Therapeutics, Inc, Westminster, CO; Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - B. Stea
- Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC; University of Arizona Health, Tucson, AZ; Petz Aladar Hospital of Gyor-Moson, Gyor, Hungary; Hopital de Montbéliard, Montbéliard, France; Allos Therapeutics, Inc, Westminster, CO; Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - T. Pinter
- Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC; University of Arizona Health, Tucson, AZ; Petz Aladar Hospital of Gyor-Moson, Gyor, Hungary; Hopital de Montbéliard, Montbéliard, France; Allos Therapeutics, Inc, Westminster, CO; Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Y. Hammoud
- Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC; University of Arizona Health, Tucson, AZ; Petz Aladar Hospital of Gyor-Moson, Gyor, Hungary; Hopital de Montbéliard, Montbéliard, France; Allos Therapeutics, Inc, Westminster, CO; Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - P. J. Cagnoni
- Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC; University of Arizona Health, Tucson, AZ; Petz Aladar Hospital of Gyor-Moson, Gyor, Hungary; Hopital de Montbéliard, Montbéliard, France; Allos Therapeutics, Inc, Westminster, CO; Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - J. Hackman
- Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC; University of Arizona Health, Tucson, AZ; Petz Aladar Hospital of Gyor-Moson, Gyor, Hungary; Hopital de Montbéliard, Montbéliard, France; Allos Therapeutics, Inc, Westminster, CO; Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - A. Boyd
- Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC; University of Arizona Health, Tucson, AZ; Petz Aladar Hospital of Gyor-Moson, Gyor, Hungary; Hopital de Montbéliard, Montbéliard, France; Allos Therapeutics, Inc, Westminster, CO; Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - M. Craig
- Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC; University of Arizona Health, Tucson, AZ; Petz Aladar Hospital of Gyor-Moson, Gyor, Hungary; Hopital de Montbéliard, Montbéliard, France; Allos Therapeutics, Inc, Westminster, CO; Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - J. Marks
- Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC; University of Arizona Health, Tucson, AZ; Petz Aladar Hospital of Gyor-Moson, Gyor, Hungary; Hopital de Montbéliard, Montbéliard, France; Allos Therapeutics, Inc, Westminster, CO; Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - J. Suh
- Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC; University of Arizona Health, Tucson, AZ; Petz Aladar Hospital of Gyor-Moson, Gyor, Hungary; Hopital de Montbéliard, Montbéliard, France; Allos Therapeutics, Inc, Westminster, CO; Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Nabid A, Kresl J, Stea B, Mercier JP, Roa W, Germain I, Bahary JP, Mechtler L, Holz JB, Suh J. Standard whole brain radiation (WBRT) with supplemental oxygen (O 2) with or without RSR13 (efaproxiral) in patients with brain metastases originating from NSCLC: Results of a subgroup analysis. J Clin Oncol 2004. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2004.22.90140.7115] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- A. Nabid
- Centre Hospitalier Universitarie de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, PQ, Canada; Foundation for Cancer Research and Education, Phoenix, AZ; University of Arizona Health Sciences Center, Tucson, AZ; Hopital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, Montreal, PQ, Canada; Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, AB, Canada; Hotel-Dieu de Quebec du CHUQ, Quebec Citry, PQ, Canada; CHUM-Campus Notre Dame, Montreal, PQ, Canada; Dent Neurologic Institute, Buffalo, NY; Allos Therapeutics, Inc, Westminster, CO; Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - J. Kresl
- Centre Hospitalier Universitarie de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, PQ, Canada; Foundation for Cancer Research and Education, Phoenix, AZ; University of Arizona Health Sciences Center, Tucson, AZ; Hopital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, Montreal, PQ, Canada; Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, AB, Canada; Hotel-Dieu de Quebec du CHUQ, Quebec Citry, PQ, Canada; CHUM-Campus Notre Dame, Montreal, PQ, Canada; Dent Neurologic Institute, Buffalo, NY; Allos Therapeutics, Inc, Westminster, CO; Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - B. Stea
- Centre Hospitalier Universitarie de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, PQ, Canada; Foundation for Cancer Research and Education, Phoenix, AZ; University of Arizona Health Sciences Center, Tucson, AZ; Hopital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, Montreal, PQ, Canada; Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, AB, Canada; Hotel-Dieu de Quebec du CHUQ, Quebec Citry, PQ, Canada; CHUM-Campus Notre Dame, Montreal, PQ, Canada; Dent Neurologic Institute, Buffalo, NY; Allos Therapeutics, Inc, Westminster, CO; Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - J. P. Mercier
- Centre Hospitalier Universitarie de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, PQ, Canada; Foundation for Cancer Research and Education, Phoenix, AZ; University of Arizona Health Sciences Center, Tucson, AZ; Hopital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, Montreal, PQ, Canada; Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, AB, Canada; Hotel-Dieu de Quebec du CHUQ, Quebec Citry, PQ, Canada; CHUM-Campus Notre Dame, Montreal, PQ, Canada; Dent Neurologic Institute, Buffalo, NY; Allos Therapeutics, Inc, Westminster, CO; Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - W. Roa
- Centre Hospitalier Universitarie de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, PQ, Canada; Foundation for Cancer Research and Education, Phoenix, AZ; University of Arizona Health Sciences Center, Tucson, AZ; Hopital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, Montreal, PQ, Canada; Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, AB, Canada; Hotel-Dieu de Quebec du CHUQ, Quebec Citry, PQ, Canada; CHUM-Campus Notre Dame, Montreal, PQ, Canada; Dent Neurologic Institute, Buffalo, NY; Allos Therapeutics, Inc, Westminster, CO; Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - I. Germain
- Centre Hospitalier Universitarie de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, PQ, Canada; Foundation for Cancer Research and Education, Phoenix, AZ; University of Arizona Health Sciences Center, Tucson, AZ; Hopital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, Montreal, PQ, Canada; Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, AB, Canada; Hotel-Dieu de Quebec du CHUQ, Quebec Citry, PQ, Canada; CHUM-Campus Notre Dame, Montreal, PQ, Canada; Dent Neurologic Institute, Buffalo, NY; Allos Therapeutics, Inc, Westminster, CO; Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - J.-P. Bahary
- Centre Hospitalier Universitarie de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, PQ, Canada; Foundation for Cancer Research and Education, Phoenix, AZ; University of Arizona Health Sciences Center, Tucson, AZ; Hopital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, Montreal, PQ, Canada; Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, AB, Canada; Hotel-Dieu de Quebec du CHUQ, Quebec Citry, PQ, Canada; CHUM-Campus Notre Dame, Montreal, PQ, Canada; Dent Neurologic Institute, Buffalo, NY; Allos Therapeutics, Inc, Westminster, CO; Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - L. Mechtler
- Centre Hospitalier Universitarie de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, PQ, Canada; Foundation for Cancer Research and Education, Phoenix, AZ; University of Arizona Health Sciences Center, Tucson, AZ; Hopital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, Montreal, PQ, Canada; Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, AB, Canada; Hotel-Dieu de Quebec du CHUQ, Quebec Citry, PQ, Canada; CHUM-Campus Notre Dame, Montreal, PQ, Canada; Dent Neurologic Institute, Buffalo, NY; Allos Therapeutics, Inc, Westminster, CO; Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - J. B. Holz
- Centre Hospitalier Universitarie de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, PQ, Canada; Foundation for Cancer Research and Education, Phoenix, AZ; University of Arizona Health Sciences Center, Tucson, AZ; Hopital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, Montreal, PQ, Canada; Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, AB, Canada; Hotel-Dieu de Quebec du CHUQ, Quebec Citry, PQ, Canada; CHUM-Campus Notre Dame, Montreal, PQ, Canada; Dent Neurologic Institute, Buffalo, NY; Allos Therapeutics, Inc, Westminster, CO; Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - J. Suh
- Centre Hospitalier Universitarie de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, PQ, Canada; Foundation for Cancer Research and Education, Phoenix, AZ; University of Arizona Health Sciences Center, Tucson, AZ; Hopital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, Montreal, PQ, Canada; Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, AB, Canada; Hotel-Dieu de Quebec du CHUQ, Quebec Citry, PQ, Canada; CHUM-Campus Notre Dame, Montreal, PQ, Canada; Dent Neurologic Institute, Buffalo, NY; Allos Therapeutics, Inc, Westminster, CO; Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Stea B, Nabid A, Kresl J, Roa W, Mechtler L, Senzer N, Germain I, Kass CL, Shaw E, Suh J. Safety profile of efaproxiral (RSR13), a novel radiation sensitizer, in patients undergoing radiation therapy. J Clin Oncol 2004. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2004.22.90140.3090] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- B. Stea
- University of Arizona Health Sciences Center, Tucson, AZ; Centre Hospitalier Universitarie de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, PQ, Canada; Foundation for Cancer Research & Education, Phoenix, AZ; Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, AB, Canada; Dent Neurologic Institute, Buffalo, NY; US Oncology Research, Dallas, TX; Hotel-Dieu de Quebec, Quebec City, PQ, Canada; Allos Therapeutics, Inc, Westminster, CO; Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC; Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - A. Nabid
- University of Arizona Health Sciences Center, Tucson, AZ; Centre Hospitalier Universitarie de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, PQ, Canada; Foundation for Cancer Research & Education, Phoenix, AZ; Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, AB, Canada; Dent Neurologic Institute, Buffalo, NY; US Oncology Research, Dallas, TX; Hotel-Dieu de Quebec, Quebec City, PQ, Canada; Allos Therapeutics, Inc, Westminster, CO; Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC; Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - J. Kresl
- University of Arizona Health Sciences Center, Tucson, AZ; Centre Hospitalier Universitarie de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, PQ, Canada; Foundation for Cancer Research & Education, Phoenix, AZ; Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, AB, Canada; Dent Neurologic Institute, Buffalo, NY; US Oncology Research, Dallas, TX; Hotel-Dieu de Quebec, Quebec City, PQ, Canada; Allos Therapeutics, Inc, Westminster, CO; Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC; Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - W. Roa
- University of Arizona Health Sciences Center, Tucson, AZ; Centre Hospitalier Universitarie de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, PQ, Canada; Foundation for Cancer Research & Education, Phoenix, AZ; Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, AB, Canada; Dent Neurologic Institute, Buffalo, NY; US Oncology Research, Dallas, TX; Hotel-Dieu de Quebec, Quebec City, PQ, Canada; Allos Therapeutics, Inc, Westminster, CO; Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC; Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - L. Mechtler
- University of Arizona Health Sciences Center, Tucson, AZ; Centre Hospitalier Universitarie de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, PQ, Canada; Foundation for Cancer Research & Education, Phoenix, AZ; Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, AB, Canada; Dent Neurologic Institute, Buffalo, NY; US Oncology Research, Dallas, TX; Hotel-Dieu de Quebec, Quebec City, PQ, Canada; Allos Therapeutics, Inc, Westminster, CO; Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC; Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - N. Senzer
- University of Arizona Health Sciences Center, Tucson, AZ; Centre Hospitalier Universitarie de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, PQ, Canada; Foundation for Cancer Research & Education, Phoenix, AZ; Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, AB, Canada; Dent Neurologic Institute, Buffalo, NY; US Oncology Research, Dallas, TX; Hotel-Dieu de Quebec, Quebec City, PQ, Canada; Allos Therapeutics, Inc, Westminster, CO; Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC; Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - I. Germain
- University of Arizona Health Sciences Center, Tucson, AZ; Centre Hospitalier Universitarie de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, PQ, Canada; Foundation for Cancer Research & Education, Phoenix, AZ; Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, AB, Canada; Dent Neurologic Institute, Buffalo, NY; US Oncology Research, Dallas, TX; Hotel-Dieu de Quebec, Quebec City, PQ, Canada; Allos Therapeutics, Inc, Westminster, CO; Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC; Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - C. L. Kass
- University of Arizona Health Sciences Center, Tucson, AZ; Centre Hospitalier Universitarie de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, PQ, Canada; Foundation for Cancer Research & Education, Phoenix, AZ; Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, AB, Canada; Dent Neurologic Institute, Buffalo, NY; US Oncology Research, Dallas, TX; Hotel-Dieu de Quebec, Quebec City, PQ, Canada; Allos Therapeutics, Inc, Westminster, CO; Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC; Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - E. Shaw
- University of Arizona Health Sciences Center, Tucson, AZ; Centre Hospitalier Universitarie de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, PQ, Canada; Foundation for Cancer Research & Education, Phoenix, AZ; Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, AB, Canada; Dent Neurologic Institute, Buffalo, NY; US Oncology Research, Dallas, TX; Hotel-Dieu de Quebec, Quebec City, PQ, Canada; Allos Therapeutics, Inc, Westminster, CO; Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC; Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - J. Suh
- University of Arizona Health Sciences Center, Tucson, AZ; Centre Hospitalier Universitarie de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, PQ, Canada; Foundation for Cancer Research & Education, Phoenix, AZ; Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, AB, Canada; Dent Neurologic Institute, Buffalo, NY; US Oncology Research, Dallas, TX; Hotel-Dieu de Quebec, Quebec City, PQ, Canada; Allos Therapeutics, Inc, Westminster, CO; Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC; Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Choy H, Scott C, Nabid A, Stea B, Roa W, Souhami L, Yunus F, Boyd A, Cagnoni P, Curran W. 1080 Induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent RSR13 (Efaproxiral) and trt for patients with locally advanced NSCLC: mature results of a phase II study and comparison with the results from RTOG 94-10. EJC Suppl 2003. [DOI: 10.1016/s1359-6349(03)91106-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022] Open
|
42
|
Mangia A, Tommasi S, Reshkin S, Simone G, Stea B, Schittulli F, Paradiso A. Gonadotropin releasing hormone receptor expression in primary breast cancer: Comparison of immunohistochemical, radioligand and Western blot analyses. Oncol Rep 2002. [DOI: 10.3892/or.9.5.1127] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
|
43
|
Kriederman B, Myloyde T, Bernas M, Lee-Donaldson L, Preciado S, Lynch M, Stea B, Summers P, Witte C, Witte M. Limb volume reduction after physical treatment by compression and/or massage in a rodent model of peripheral lymphedema. Lymphology 2002; 35:23-7. [PMID: 11939569] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/24/2023]
Abstract
Lack of a standardized experimental counterpart of peripheral lymphedema (LE) in a small animal has hampered research into treatment of this debilitating condition. We recently refined a rodent model consisting of radical unilateral lymphatic/nodal groin excision in conjunction with a circumferential integumental gap, followed by regional irradiation of the groin to reproduce stable unilateral hindlimb LE (1). In the current study, Wistar-Fuzzy rats with established right hindlimb LE, were subdivided into five groups and subjected to one of the following daily physical regimens over a 5-day period: pneumatic compression pumping at 30 torr (PCP); low-stretch multi-layered compressive bandaging using Coban (CB); manual lymphedema drainage (MLD) or a light massage consisting of stationary circular motions using the fingertips; combined physiotherapy (CPT consisting of MLD + CB); and a no treatment or control group (CTRL). Hindlimb and LE volumes were serially measured before and after treatment. Whereas CTRL showed progressive worsening of hindlimb swelling, PCP, CB, CPT and MLD each produced similar and substantial edema reduction over the 5 day interval, PCP, CB and CPT induced vacillating edema reduction which, however, exceeded rebound swelling on a daily basis. MLD, on the other hand, showed a steady gradual daily decline in LE volume.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B Kriederman
- Department of Surgery, The University of Arizona, Tucson 85724-5063, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Choy H, Nabid A, Stea B, Roa W, Souhami L, Yunus F, Roberts P, Johnson D. Improved local control with RSR-13 and concurrent radiation therapy in a phase II study for locally advanced inoperable non-small cell lung cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2001. [DOI: 10.1016/s0360-3016(01)02483-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
|
45
|
Algan O, Fosmire H, Hynynen K, Dalkin B, Cui H, Drach G, Stea B, Cassady JR. External beam radiotherapy and hyperthermia in the treatment of patients with locally advanced prostate carcinoma. Cancer 2000; 89:399-403. [PMID: 10918172] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/17/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The current study was conducted to evaluate the combination of external beam radiation therapy and hyperthermia in the treatment of patients with locally advanced prostate carcinoma. METHODS Twenty-six patients were treated on a Phase I/II protocol between June 1990 and April 1993. The median age of the patients was 69 years. Nine patients had well differentiated adenocarcinoma, ten patients had moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma, and six patients had poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma. All patients had American Urologic Society Stage C2-D1 adenocarcinoma. The median pretreatment prostate specific antigen (PSA) level was 29 ng/mL (range, 6-104 ng/mL). All patients received external beam radiation therapy using a four-field technique. The median radiation dose was 6,800 centigrays (cGy) given in 200-cGy fractions. Hyperthermia was administered concurrently with radiation therapy to temperatures of 42.5 degrees C for 30 minutes using a transrectal ultrasound applicator with 3 thermometry probes, given as either a single treatment (9 patients) or as two treatments (17 patients). Overall survival (OS) and biochemical no evidence of disease (bNED) status were calculated using Kaplan-Meier analysis. A consensus conference definition of PSA failure was used. The Cox proportional hazards model was used for multivariate analysis. The median follow-up for all patients was 71 months. RESULTS The median time to PSA nadir was 15 months with a median PSA nadir value of 1.0 ng/mL. The median and 5-year OS was 88 months and 73%, respectively, and the median and 5-year bNED survival was 36 months and 35%, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed only the pretreatment PSA level (P = 0.03) and the PSA nadir reached (P < 0.01) to be significant predictors of bNED survival. The duration of hyperthermia therapy showed a trend toward significance for OS (P = 0.06). CONCLUSIONS The current Phase I/II protocol evaluating the combination of prostate hyperthermia and external beam radiation therapy for the treatment of patients with locally advanced prostate carcinoma suggests prostate hyperthermia to be feasible with no apparent significant increased toxicity, although there was no significant improvement in treatment outcome when compared with other studies reported in the literature evaluating external beam radiation therapy with or without androgen suppression. However, further investigation into the duration as well as the temperature of the hyperthermia with a greater number of patients is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- O Algan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85724-5081, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Takacs I, Hamilton AJ, Lulu B, Fosmire H, Johnson P, Stea B, Sapareto S. Frame based stereotactic spinal radiosurgery: experience from the first 19 patients treated. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 2000; 73:69. [PMID: 10853102 DOI: 10.1159/000029755] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- I Takacs
- University of Arizona Health Sciences Center, Tucson, Ariz., USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Anderson JM, Stea B, Hallum AV, Rogoff E, Childers J. High-dose-rate postoperative vaginal cuff irradiation alone for stage IB and IC endometrial cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2000; 46:417-25. [PMID: 10661349 DOI: 10.1016/s0360-3016(99)00427-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 109] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the effectiveness of postoperative high-dose-rate (HDR) vaginal cuff irradiation alone (1500 cGy in 3 fractions) in patients with Stage Ib and Ic endometrial cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS This is a retrospective review of 102 patients with Stage Ib and Ic endometrial cancer treated with a hysterectomy and postoperative HDR intracavitary therapy alone during the period of 1/1/90-12/31/96. Each patient received 1500 cGy in 3 weekly treatments, dosed to a depth of 0.5 cm. Pathologic features such as depth of invasion, tumor grade, lower uterine segment (LUS) involvement, and lymphvascular invasion (LVI) were evaluated for their impact on recommended postoperative treatment. All survival curves were generated utilizing Kaplan-Meier methods and all statistical comparisons were via a Wilcoxon rank sum test. RESULTS The 5-year actuarial overall survival (OS) is 84% and the 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) is 93%. Locoregional disease control (pelvic control) was excellent with 97% of the patients free of pelvic disease at 5 years. Of the three pelvic failures only one was in the vaginal cuff. LVI, LUS involvement, Grade 3 and/or outer third myometrial involvement were identified in 41 patients. Thirty-one of these patients underwent a lymphadenectomy and there were two regional failures within this increased-risk group. CONCLUSIONS We obtained an excellent level of locoregional control with minimal morbidity and minimal time commitment for treatment with vaginal HDR brachytherapy alone. Our dose per fraction and total dose is lower than most reported series and there is no apparent loss in locoregional control. In addition, intermediate-risk patients and patients with an increased risk of recurrence (Grade 3, outer third myometrial involvement, LVI, LUS) may be treated with cuff irradiation alone, after surgical staging and a negative lymphadenectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J M Anderson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Arizona, Tucson 85724, USA.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Lee-Donaldson L, Witte MH, Bernas M, Witte CL, Way D, Stea B. Refinement of a rodent model of peripheral lymphedema. Lymphology 1999; 32:111-7. [PMID: 10494523] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/14/2023]
Abstract
A reliable, inexpensive experimental counterpart of peripheral lymphedema has been notoriously difficult to reproduce thereby stifling basic and clinical research into this frustrating clinical condition. Accordingly, in 45 adult Wistar-Fuzzy rats, we attempted to produce sustained hindlimb lymphedema by either groin nodal/lymphatic microsurgical ablation (S) (guided by visual blue dye lymphography) or limited field-groin irradiation (R) alone (4500 rads) or combined S followed by R or R followed by S with an additional non-manipulated group serving as controls. Observations were made for 30-100 days thereafter. Hindlimb volumes were determined serially using the truncated cone formula based on multiple circumferential measurements at standardized intervals along the affected hindlimb and the findings compared with similar measurements in the contralateral non-manipulated hindlimb. In randomly selected rats from each group, lymphatic drainage was assessed by lymphangioscintigraphy (LAS), soft tissue swelling by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and edema fluid total protein content by refractometry. Whereas S or R alone produced only transient or mild hindlimb edema without associated morbidity or mortality, S-R or R-S induced moderate to severe sustained protein-rich hindlimb lymphedema associated with 9-13% early mortality and notable late local limb morbidity. Lymphatic obstruction was documented by sustained maintenance of increased hindlimb volume, subcutaneous fluid accumulation (MRI), and impaired lymphatic drainage (LAS). This reproducible rodent model of secondary lymphedema reliably simulates a stable clinical condition for a window of up to 100 days and should thereby facilitate standardized testing of therapeutic/preventive protocols and basic research into lymphatic dynamics in secondary lymphedema.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Lee-Donaldson
- Department of Surgery and Radiation Oncology, University of Arizona College of Medicine, Tucson, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Mangia A, De Lena M, Barletta A, Marzullo F, Attolico M, Stea B, Petroni S, Labriola A, Cellamare G, Digiesi G, Altieri R, Schittulli F, Paradiso A. Timing of breast cancer surgery within the menstrual cycle: tumor proliferative activity, receptor status and short-term clinical outcome. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 1998; 17:317-23. [PMID: 9894769] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/09/2023]
Abstract
We verified the variations of primary tumour steroid receptor status and proliferative activity at different times and phases (follicular vs luteal) of the menstrual cycle and their relationship with short clinical outcome in a cohort of 248 N- breast cancer patients. Steroid receptor content (ER and PgR) was evaluated by DCC assay and proliferative activity by 3H-Thymidine autoradiographic assay (TLI). Median age was 44 years, 60% of tumors were T1, and cytohistological grade was G1-2 in 54% of cases. At surgery, 57% were in the luteal phase while 43% were in the follicular phase. No significant variations were found in mean TLI or ER and PgR characteristics of the primary tumors surgically treated in different periods of the menstrual cycle; however, the ER level resulted significantly higher in 4th with respect to the 3rd week of menstrual cycle, while PgR level was higher in PgR+ cases treated during the 3rd week. The number of relapses and disease-free survival curves after 36 months median follow-up did not differ significantly for patients treated in different periods of the menstrual cycle (12% and 9% of disease relapses in luteal and follicular phases; p=n.s.). We can conclude, therefore, that TLI, ER and PgR expressions could vary significantly during menstrual cycle only in certain specific tumor subgroups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Mangia
- Experimental and Clinical Oncology Laboratory, Oncology Institute, Bari, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
Stea B, Hamilton A, Sapareto S. Spinal stereotactic radiosurgery: A phase-study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1998. [DOI: 10.1016/s0360-3016(98)80280-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
|