1
|
Schmied C, Nelson MS, Avilov S, Bakker GJ, Bertocchi C, Bischof J, Boehm U, Brocher J, Carvalho MT, Chiritescu C, Christopher J, Cimini BA, Conde-Sousa E, Ebner M, Ecker R, Eliceiri K, Fernandez-Rodriguez J, Gaudreault N, Gelman L, Grunwald D, Gu T, Halidi N, Hammer M, Hartley M, Held M, Jug F, Kapoor V, Koksoy AA, Lacoste J, Le Dévédec S, Le Guyader S, Liu P, Martins GG, Mathur A, Miura K, Montero Llopis P, Nitschke R, North A, Parslow AC, Payne-Dwyer A, Plantard L, Ali R, Schroth-Diez B, Schütz L, Scott RT, Seitz A, Selchow O, Sharma VP, Spitaler M, Srinivasan S, Strambio-De-Castillia C, Taatjes D, Tischer C, Jambor HK. Community-developed checklists for publishing images and image analyses. Nat Methods 2024; 21:170-181. [PMID: 37710020 PMCID: PMC10922596 DOI: 10.1038/s41592-023-01987-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2023] [Accepted: 07/26/2023] [Indexed: 09/16/2023]
Abstract
Images document scientific discoveries and are prevalent in modern biomedical research. Microscopy imaging in particular is currently undergoing rapid technological advancements. However, for scientists wishing to publish obtained images and image-analysis results, there are currently no unified guidelines for best practices. Consequently, microscopy images and image data in publications may be unclear or difficult to interpret. Here, we present community-developed checklists for preparing light microscopy images and describing image analyses for publications. These checklists offer authors, readers and publishers key recommendations for image formatting and annotation, color selection, data availability and reporting image-analysis workflows. The goal of our guidelines is to increase the clarity and reproducibility of image figures and thereby to heighten the quality and explanatory power of microscopy data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher Schmied
- Fondazione Human Technopole, Milano, Italy.
- Leibniz-Forschungsinstitut für Molekulare Pharmakologie (FMP), Berlin, Germany.
| | - Michael S Nelson
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Sergiy Avilov
- Max Planck Institute of Immunobiology and Epigenetics, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Gert-Jan Bakker
- Medical BioSciences Department, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Cristina Bertocchi
- Laboratory for Molecular Mechanics of Cell Adhesions, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile Santiago, Santiago de Chile, Chile
- Graduate School of Engineering Science, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
| | | | | | - Jan Brocher
- Scientific Image Processing and Analysis, BioVoxxel, Ludwigshafen, Germany
| | - Mariana T Carvalho
- Nanophotonics and BioImaging Facility at INL, International Iberian Nanotechnology Laboratory, Braga, Portugal
| | | | - Jana Christopher
- Biochemistry Center Heidelberg, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Beth A Cimini
- Imaging Platform, Broad Institute, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Eduardo Conde-Sousa
- i3S, Instituto de Investigação e Inovação Em Saúde and INEB, Instituto de Engenharia Biomédica, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Michael Ebner
- Leibniz-Forschungsinstitut für Molekulare Pharmakologie (FMP), Berlin, Germany
| | - Rupert Ecker
- Translational Research Institute, Queensland University of Technology, Woolloongabba, Queensland, Australia
- School of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
- TissueGnostics GmbH, Vienna, Austria
| | - Kevin Eliceiri
- Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Julia Fernandez-Rodriguez
- Centre for Cellular Imaging Core Facility, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | | | - Laurent Gelman
- Friedrich Miescher Institute for Biomedical Research, Basel, Switzerland
| | - David Grunwald
- RNA Therapeutics Institute, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA
| | | | - Nadia Halidi
- Advanced Light Microscopy Unit, Centre for Genomic Regulation, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Mathias Hammer
- RNA Therapeutics Institute, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA
| | - Matthew Hartley
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL), European Bioinformatics Institute, Hinxton, UK
| | - Marie Held
- Centre for Cell Imaging, the University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | | | - Varun Kapoor
- Department of AI Research, Kapoor Labs, Paris, France
| | | | | | - Sylvia Le Dévédec
- Division of Drug Discovery and Safety, Cell Observatory, Leiden Academic Centre for Drug Research, Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | | | - Penghuan Liu
- Key Laboratory for Modern Measurement Technology and Instruments of Zhejiang Province, College of Optical and Electronic Technology, China Jiliang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Gabriel G Martins
- Advanced Imaging Facility, Instituto Gulbenkian de Ciência, Oeiras, Portugal
| | | | - Kota Miura
- Bioimage Analysis and Research, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Roland Nitschke
- Life Imaging Center, Signalling Research Centres CIBSS and BIOSS, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Alison North
- Bio-Imaging Resource Center, the Rockefeller University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Adam C Parslow
- Baker Institute Microscopy Platform, Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Alex Payne-Dwyer
- School of Physics, Engineering and Technology, University of York, Heslington, UK
| | - Laure Plantard
- Friedrich Miescher Institute for Biomedical Research, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Rizwan Ali
- King Abdullah International Medical Research Center (KAIMRC), Medical Research Core Facility and Platforms (MRCFP), King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences (KSAU-HS), Ministry of National Guard Health Affairs, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Britta Schroth-Diez
- Light Microscopy Facility, Max Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | | | - Ryan T Scott
- Space Biosciences Division, NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA, USA
| | - Arne Seitz
- BioImaging and Optics Platform, Faculty of Life Sciences (SV), École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Olaf Selchow
- Microscopy and BioImaging Consulting, Image Processing and Large Data Handling, Gera, Germany
| | - Ved P Sharma
- Bio-Imaging Resource Center, the Rockefeller University, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Sathya Srinivasan
- Imaging and Morphology Support Core, Oregon National Primate Research Center, OHSU West Campus, Beaverton, OR, USA
| | | | - Douglas Taatjes
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Microscopy Imaging Center, Center for Biomedical Shared Resources, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Schmied C, Nelson MS, Avilov S, Bakker GJ, Bertocchi C, Bischof J, Boehm U, Brocher J, Carvalho M, Chiritescu C, Christopher J, Cimini BA, Conde-Sousa E, Ebner M, Ecker R, Eliceiri K, Fernandez-Rodriguez J, Gaudreault N, Gelman L, Grunwald D, Gu T, Halidi N, Hammer M, Hartley M, Held M, Jug F, Kapoor V, Koksoy AA, Lacoste J, Dévédec SL, Guyader SL, Liu P, Martins GG, Mathur A, Miura K, Montero Llopis P, Nitschke R, North A, Parslow AC, Payne-Dwyer A, Plantard L, Ali R, Schroth-Diez B, Schütz L, Scott RT, Seitz A, Selchow O, Sharma VP, Spitaler M, Srinivasan S, Strambio-De-Castillia C, Taatjes D, Tischer C, Jambor HK. Community-developed checklists for publishing images and image analyses. ArXiv 2023:arXiv:2302.07005v2. [PMID: 36824427 PMCID: PMC9949169] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/25/2023]
Abstract
Images document scientific discoveries and are prevalent in modern biomedical research. Microscopy imaging in particular is currently undergoing rapid technological advancements. However for scientists wishing to publish the obtained images and image analyses results, there are to date no unified guidelines. Consequently, microscopy images and image data in publications may be unclear or difficult to interpret. Here we present community-developed checklists for preparing light microscopy images and image analysis for publications. These checklists offer authors, readers, and publishers key recommendations for image formatting and annotation, color selection, data availability, and for reporting image analysis workflows. The goal of our guidelines is to increase the clarity and reproducibility of image figures and thereby heighten the quality and explanatory power of microscopy data is in publications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher Schmied
- Fondazione Human Technopole, Viale Rita Levi-Montalcini 1, 20157 Milano, Italy
- Present address: Leibniz-Forschungsinstitut für Molekulare Pharmakologie (FMP), Robert-Rössle-Str. 10, 13125 Berlin, Germany
| | - Michael S Nelson
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, 53706, USA
| | - Sergiy Avilov
- Max Planck Institute of Immunobiology and Epigenetics, 79108 Freiburg, Germany
| | - Gert-Jan Bakker
- Medical BioSciences department, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Cristina Bertocchi
- Laboratory for Molecular mechanics of cell adhesions, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile Santiago
- Osaka University, Graduate School of Engineering Science, Japan
| | - Johanna Bischof
- Euro-BioImaging ERIC, Bio-Hub, Meyerhofstr. 1, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Ulrike Boehm
- Carl Zeiss AG, Carl-Zeiss-Straße 22, 73447 Oberkochen, Germany
| | - Jan Brocher
- BioVoxxel, Scientific Image Processing and Analysis, Eugen-Roth-Strasse 8, 67071 Ludwigshafen, Germany
| | - Mariana Carvalho
- Nanophotonics and BioImaging Facility at INL, International Iberian Nanotechnology Laboratory, 4715-330, Portugal
| | | | | | - Beth A Cimini
- Imaging Platform, Broad Institute, Cambridge, MA 02142
| | - Eduardo Conde-Sousa
- i3S, Instituto de Investigação e Inovação Em Saúde and INEB, Instituto de Engenharia Biomédica, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Michael Ebner
- Fondazione Human Technopole, Viale Rita Levi-Montalcini 1, 20157 Milano, Italy
| | - Rupert Ecker
- Translational Research Institute, Queensland University of Technology, 37 Kent Street, Woolloongabba, QLD 4102, Australia
- School of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD 4059, Australia
- TissueGnostics GmbH, 1020 Vienna, Austria
| | - Kevin Eliceiri
- Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, 53706, USA
| | | | | | - Laurent Gelman
- Friedrich Miescher Institute for Biomedical Research, Basel, Switzerland
| | - David Grunwald
- RNA Therapeutics Institute, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, Worcester, MA 01605, USA
| | | | - Nadia Halidi
- Advanced Light Microscopy Unit, Centre for Genomic Regulation, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Mathias Hammer
- RNA Therapeutics Institute, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, Worcester, MA 01605, USA
| | - Matthew Hartley
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI), Hinxton, UK
| | - Marie Held
- Centre for Cell Imaging, The University of Liverpool, UK
| | - Florian Jug
- Fondazione Human Technopole, Viale Rita Levi-Montalcini 1, 20157 Milano, Italy
| | - Varun Kapoor
- Department of AI research, Kapoor Labs, Paris, 75005, France
| | | | | | - Sylvia Le Dévédec
- Division of Drug Discovery and Safety, Cell Observatory, Leiden Academic Centre for Drug Research, Leiden University, 2333 CC Leiden, The Netherlands
| | | | - Penghuan Liu
- Key Laboratory for Modern Measurement Technology and Instruments of Zhejiang Province, College of Optical and Electronic Technology, China Jiliang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Gabriel G Martins
- Advanced Imaging Facility, Instituto Gulbenkian de Ciência, Oeiras 2780-156 - Portugal
| | - Aastha Mathur
- Euro-BioImaging ERIC, Bio-Hub, Meyerhofstr. 1, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Kota Miura
- Bioimage Analysis & Research, 69127 Heidelberg/Germany
| | | | - Roland Nitschke
- Life Imaging Center, Signalling Research Centres CIBSS and BIOSS, University of Freiburg, Germany
| | - Alison North
- Bio-Imaging Resource Center, The Rockefeller University, New York, NY USA
| | - Adam C Parslow
- Baker Institute Microscopy Platform, Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia
| | - Alex Payne-Dwyer
- School of Physics, Engineering and Technology, University of York, Heslington, YO10 5DD, UK
| | - Laure Plantard
- Friedrich Miescher Institute for Biomedical Research, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Rizwan Ali
- King Abdullah International Medical Research Center (KAIMRC), Medical Research Core Facility and Platforms (MRCFP), King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences (KSAU-HS), Ministry of National Guard Health Affairs (MNGHA), Riyadh 11481, Saudi Arabia
| | - Britta Schroth-Diez
- Light Microscopy Facility, Max Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics Dresden, Pfotenhauerstrasse 108, 01307 Dresden, Germany
| | - Lucas Schütz
- ariadne.ai (Germany) GmbH, 69115 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Ryan T Scott
- Space Biosciences Division, NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA, 94035, USA
| | - Arne Seitz
- BioImaging & Optics Platform (BIOP), Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Faculty of Life sciences (SV), CH-1015 Lausanne
| | - Olaf Selchow
- Microscopy & BioImaging Consulting, Image Processing & Large Data Handling, Tobias-Hoppe-Strassse 3, 07548 Gera, Germany
| | - Ved P Sharma
- Bio-Imaging Resource Center, The Rockefeller University, New York, NY USA
| | - Martin Spitaler
- Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry, Am Klopferspitz 18, 82152 Martinsried, Germany
| | - Sathya Srinivasan
- Imaging and Morphology Support Core, Oregon National Primate Research Center - (ONPRC - OHSU West Campus), Beaverton, Oregon 97006, USA
| | | | - Douglas Taatjes
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Microscopy Imaging Center (RRID# SCR_018821), Center for Biomedical Shared Resources, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05405 USA
| | - Christian Tischer
- Centre for Bioimage Analysis, EMBL Heidelberg, Meyerhofstr. 1, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Helena Klara Jambor
- NCT-UCC, Medizinische Fakultät TU Dresden, Fetscherstrasse 105, 01307 Dresden/Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Nelson G, Boehm U, Bagley S, Bajcsy P, Bischof J, Brown CM, Dauphin A, Dobbie IM, Eriksson JE, Faklaris O, Fernandez-Rodriguez J, Ferrand A, Gelman L, Gheisari A, Hartmann H, Kukat C, Laude A, Mitkovski M, Munck S, North AJ, Rasse TM, Resch-Genger U, Schuetz LC, Seitz A, Strambio-De-Castillia C, Swedlow JR, Alexopoulos I, Aumayr K, Avilov S, Bakker GJ, Bammann RR, Bassi A, Beckert H, Beer S, Belyaev Y, Bierwagen J, Birngruber KA, Bosch M, Breitlow J, Cameron LA, Chalfoun J, Chambers JJ, Chen CL, Conde-Sousa E, Corbett AD, Cordelieres FP, Nery ED, Dietzel R, Eismann F, Fazeli E, Felscher A, Fried H, Gaudreault N, Goh WI, Guilbert T, Hadleigh R, Hemmerich P, Holst GA, Itano MS, Jaffe CB, Jambor HK, Jarvis SC, Keppler A, Kirchenbuechler D, Kirchner M, Kobayashi N, Krens G, Kunis S, Lacoste J, Marcello M, Martins GG, Metcalf DJ, Mitchell CA, Moore J, Mueller T, Nelson MS, Ogg S, Onami S, Palmer AL, Paul-Gilloteaux P, Pimentel JA, Plantard L, Podder S, Rexhepaj E, Royon A, Saari MA, Schapman D, Schoonderwoert V, Schroth-Diez B, Schwartz S, Shaw M, Spitaler M, Stoeckl MT, Sudar D, Teillon J, Terjung S, Thuenauer R, Wilms CD, Wright GD, Nitschke R. QUAREP-LiMi: A community-driven initiative to establish guidelines for quality assessment and reproducibility for instruments and images in light microscopy. J Microsc 2021; 284:56-73. [PMID: 34214188 PMCID: PMC10388377 DOI: 10.1111/jmi.13041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2021] [Accepted: 06/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
A modern day light microscope has evolved from a tool devoted to making primarily empirical observations to what is now a sophisticated , quantitative device that is an integral part of both physical and life science research. Nowadays, microscopes are found in nearly every experimental laboratory. However, despite their prevalent use in capturing and quantifying scientific phenomena, neither a thorough understanding of the principles underlying quantitative imaging techniques nor appropriate knowledge of how to calibrate, operate and maintain microscopes can be taken for granted. This is clearly demonstrated by the well-documented and widespread difficulties that are routinely encountered in evaluating acquired data and reproducing scientific experiments. Indeed, studies have shown that more than 70% of researchers have tried and failed to repeat another scientist's experiments, while more than half have even failed to reproduce their own experiments. One factor behind the reproducibility crisis of experiments published in scientific journals is the frequent underreporting of imaging methods caused by a lack of awareness and/or a lack of knowledge of the applied technique. Whereas quality control procedures for some methods used in biomedical research, such as genomics (e.g. DNA sequencing, RNA-seq) or cytometry, have been introduced (e.g. ENCODE), this issue has not been tackled for optical microscopy instrumentation and images. Although many calibration standards and protocols have been published, there is a lack of awareness and agreement on common standards and guidelines for quality assessment and reproducibility. In April 2020, the QUality Assessment and REProducibility for instruments and images in Light Microscopy (QUAREP-LiMi) initiative was formed. This initiative comprises imaging scientists from academia and industry who share a common interest in achieving a better understanding of the performance and limitations of microscopes and improved quality control (QC) in light microscopy. The ultimate goal of the QUAREP-LiMi initiative is to establish a set of common QC standards, guidelines, metadata models and tools, including detailed protocols, with the ultimate aim of improving reproducible advances in scientific research. This White Paper (1) summarizes the major obstacles identified in the field that motivated the launch of the QUAREP-LiMi initiative; (2) identifies the urgent need to address these obstacles in a grassroots manner, through a community of stakeholders including, researchers, imaging scientists, bioimage analysts, bioimage informatics developers, corporate partners, funding agencies, standards organizations, scientific publishers and observers of such; (3) outlines the current actions of the QUAREP-LiMi initiative and (4) proposes future steps that can be taken to improve the dissemination and acceptance of the proposed guidelines to manage QC. To summarize, the principal goal of the QUAREP-LiMi initiative is to improve the overall quality and reproducibility of light microscope image data by introducing broadly accepted standard practices and accurately captured image data metrics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Glyn Nelson
- Bioimaging Unit, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Ulrike Boehm
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, Virginia, USA
| | - Steve Bagley
- Visualisation, Irradiation & Analysis, Cancer Research UK Manchester Institute, Alderley Park, Macclesfield, UK
| | - Peter Bajcsy
- National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA
| | | | - Claire M Brown
- Advanced BioImaging Facility (ABIF), McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Aurélien Dauphin
- Unité Génétique et Biologie du Développement U934, PICT-IBiSA, Institut Curie/Inserm/CNRS/PSL Research University, Paris, France
| | - Ian M Dobbie
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxon, UK
| | - John E Eriksson
- Turku Bioscience Centre, Euro-Bioimaging ERIC, Turku, Finland
| | | | | | - Alexia Ferrand
- Imaging Core Facility, Biozentrum, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Laurent Gelman
- Friedrich Miescher Institute for Biomedical Research, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Ali Gheisari
- Light Microscopy Facility, CMCB Technology Platform, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Hella Hartmann
- Light Microscopy Facility, CMCB Technology Platform, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Christian Kukat
- FACS & Imaging Core Facility, Max Planck Institute for Biology of Ageing, Cologne, Germany
| | - Alex Laude
- Bioimaging Unit, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Miso Mitkovski
- Light Microscopy Facility, Max Planck Institute of Experimental Medicine, Goettingen, Germany
| | - Sebastian Munck
- VIB BioImaging Core & VIB-KU Leuven Center for Brain and Disease Research & KU Leuven Department for Neuroscience, Leuven, Flanders, Belgium
| | | | - Tobias M Rasse
- Scientific Service Group Microscopy, Max Planck Institute for Heart and Lung Research, Bad Nauheim, Germany
| | - Ute Resch-Genger
- Division Biophotonics, Federal Institute for Materials Research and Testing, Berlin, Germany
| | - Lucas C Schuetz
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Advanced Light Microscopy Facility, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Arne Seitz
- Faculty of Life Sciences, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Vaud, Switzerland
| | | | - Jason R Swedlow
- Divisions of Computational Biology and Gene Regulation and Expression, School of Life Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
| | - Ioannis Alexopoulos
- General Instrumentation - Light Microscopy Facility, Faculty of Science, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Karin Aumayr
- BioOptics Facility, IMP - Research Institute of Molecular Pathology, Vienna, Austria
| | - Sergiy Avilov
- Max Planck Institute of Immunobiology and Epigenetics, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Gert-Jan Bakker
- Department of Cell Biology (route 283), Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Andrea Bassi
- Dipartimento di Fisica, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Hannes Beckert
- Microscopy Core Facility, Medizinische Fakultät, Universität Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | | | - Yury Belyaev
- Microscopy Imaging Center, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | | | | | - Manel Bosch
- Faculty of Biology, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Lisa A Cameron
- Light Microscopy Core Facility, Department of Biology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Joe Chalfoun
- National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA
| | - James J Chambers
- Institute for Applied Life Sciences, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts, USA
| | | | - Eduardo Conde-Sousa
- i3S - Instituto de InvestigaÇão e InovaÇão em Saúde, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal.,INEB - Instituto de Engenharia Biomédica, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | | | | | - Elaine Del Nery
- BioPhenics High-Content Screening Laboratory (PICT-IBiSA), Translational Research Department, Institut Curie - PSL Research University, Paris, France
| | - Ralf Dietzel
- Omicron-Laserage Laserprodukte GmbH, Rodgau, Germany
| | | | | | | | - Hans Fried
- Light Microscope Facility, German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Bonn, Germany
| | | | - Wah Ing Goh
- A*STAR Microscopy Platform, Research Support Centre, Agency for Science, Technology and Research, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Thomas Guilbert
- Institut Cochin, INSERM (U1016), CNRS (UMR 8104), Université de Paris (UMR-S1016), Paris, France
| | | | - Peter Hemmerich
- Core Facility Imaging, Leibniz Institute on Aging, Jena, Germany
| | | | - Michelle S Itano
- Neuroscience Microscopy Core, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | | | - Helena K Jambor
- Mildred-Scheel Nachwuchszentrum, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Stuart C Jarvis
- Prior Scientific Instruments Limited, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, UK
| | - Antje Keppler
- EMBL Heidelberg, Global BioImaging, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Marcel Kirchner
- FACS & Imaging Core Facility, Max Planck Institute for Biology of Ageing, Cologne, Germany
| | | | - Gabriel Krens
- Bioimaging Facility, Institute of Science and Technology Austria, Klosterneuburg, Austria
| | - Susanne Kunis
- University Osnabrueck, Biology/Chemistry, Osnabrueck, Germany
| | | | - Marco Marcello
- Institute of Systems, Molecular & Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, Merseyside, UK
| | - Gabriel G Martins
- Instituto Gulbenkian de Ciencia & Faculdade de Ciencias, University of Lisboa, Oeiras, Portugal
| | | | - Claire A Mitchell
- Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, West Midlands, UK
| | - Joshua Moore
- Divisions of Computational Biology and Gene Regulation and Expression, School of Life Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
| | - Tobias Mueller
- Gregor Mendel Institute of Molecular Plant Biology (GMI), Vienna, Austria
| | | | - Stephen Ogg
- Medical Microbiology & Immunology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Shuichi Onami
- RIKEN Center for Biosystems Dynamics Research, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan
| | | | - Perrine Paul-Gilloteaux
- Université de Nantes, CHU Nantes, Inserm, CNRS, SFR Santé, Inserm UMS 016, CNRS UMS 3556, F-44000 Nantes, France
| | - Jaime A Pimentel
- Instituto de Biotecnología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico
| | - Laure Plantard
- Friedrich Miescher Institute for Biomedical Research, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Santosh Podder
- Microscopy Facility, Department of Biology, Indian Institute of Science Education and Research Pune, Pune, India
| | | | | | - Markku A Saari
- Turku Bioscience Centre, University of Turku and Åbo Akademi University, Turku, Finland
| | - Damien Schapman
- UNIROUEN, INSERM, PRIMACEN, Normandie University, Rouen, France
| | | | - Britta Schroth-Diez
- Light Microscopy Facility, Max Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics, Dresden, Germany
| | | | - Michael Shaw
- National Physical Laboratory, Teddington, Middlesex, UK
| | - Martin Spitaler
- Imaging Facility, Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry, Martinsried, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Damir Sudar
- Quantitative Imaging Systems, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Jeremie Teillon
- Bordeaux Imaging Center, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, Gironde, France
| | - Stefan Terjung
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Advanced Light Microscopy Facility, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Roland Thuenauer
- Technology Platform Microscopy and Image Analysis, Heinrich Pette Institute, Leibniz Institute for Experimental Virology, Hamburg, Germany
| | | | - Graham D Wright
- A*STAR Microscopy Platform, Research Support Centre, Agency for Science, Technology and Research, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Roland Nitschke
- Life Imaging Center and BIOSS Centre for Biological Signaling Studies, Albert-Ludwigs-University Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Dietzel S, Ferrando-May E, Fried H, Kukat C, Naumann A, Nitschke R, Pasierbek P, Peychl J, Rasse TM, Schroth-Diez B, Stöckl MT, Terjung S, Thuenauer R, Tulok S, Weidtkamp-Peters S. A Joint Action in Times of Pandemic: The German BioImaging Recommendations for Operating Imaging Core Facilities During the SARS-Cov-2 Emergency. Cytometry A 2020; 97:882-886. [PMID: 32583531 PMCID: PMC7361206 DOI: 10.1002/cyto.a.24178] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2020] [Revised: 06/16/2020] [Accepted: 06/19/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Operating shared resource laboratories (SRLs) in times of pandemic is a challenge for research institutions. In a multiuser, high‐turnover working space, the transmission of infectious agents is difficult to control. To address this challenge, imaging core facility managers being members of German BioImaging discussed how shared microscopes could be operated with minimal risk of spreading SARS‐CoV‐2 between users and staff. Here, we describe the resulting guidelines and explain their rationale, with a focus on separating users in space and time, protective face masks, and keeping surfaces virus‐free. These recommendations may prove useful for other types of SRLs. © 2020 The Authors. Cytometry Part A published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. on behalf of International Society for Advancement of Cytometry.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steffen Dietzel
- Core Facility Bioimaging at the Biomedical Center, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Planegg-Martinsried, Großhaderner Straße 9, 82152, Germany
| | - Elisa Ferrando-May
- Bioimaging Center, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Universitätsstrasse 10, 78464, Germany
| | - Hans Fried
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Light Microscopy Facility, Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, Gebäude 99, 53127, Germany
| | - Christian Kukat
- FACS & Imaging Core Facility, Max Planck Institute for Biology of Ageing, Cologne, Joseph-Stelzmann-Str. 9b, 50931, Germany
| | - Angela Naumann
- Life Imaging Center and BIOSS Centre for Biological Signaling Studies, Albert-Ludwigs-University Freiburg, Freiburg, Habsburgerstr. 49, 79104, Germany
| | - Roland Nitschke
- Life Imaging Center and BIOSS Centre for Biological Signaling Studies, Albert-Ludwigs-University Freiburg, Freiburg, Habsburgerstr. 49, 79104, Germany
| | - Pawel Pasierbek
- Biooptics Core Facility, Institute of Molecular Biotechnology of the Austrian Academy of Sciences (IMBA), Vienna BioCenter (VBC), Vienna, Dr. Bohr-Gasse 3, 1030, Austria
| | - Jan Peychl
- Light Microscopy Facility (LMF) Max Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics Dresden, Dresden, Pfotenhauerstrasse 108, 01307, Germany
| | - Tobias Manuel Rasse
- Scientific Service Group Microscopy, Max Planck Institute for Heart and Lung Research, Bad Nauheim, Ludwigstraße 43, 61231, Germany
| | - Britta Schroth-Diez
- Light Microscopy Facility (LMF) Max Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics Dresden, Dresden, Pfotenhauerstrasse 108, 01307, Germany
| | - Martin Thomas Stöckl
- Bioimaging Center, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Universitätsstrasse 10, 78464, Germany
| | - Stefan Terjung
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Advanced Light Microscopy Facility, Heidelberg, Meyerhofstraße 1, 69117, Germany
| | - Roland Thuenauer
- Advanced Light and Fluorescence Microscopy Facility, Centre for Structural Systems Biology (CSSB), Hamburg, Germany and Department of Biology, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Silke Tulok
- Technische Universität Dresden, Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, Core Facility Cellular Imaging, Dresden, Fetscherstrasse 74, 01307, Germany
| | - Stefanie Weidtkamp-Peters
- Center for Advanced Imaging, Heinrich-Heine University Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Universitätsstr. 1, 40225, Germany
| | -
- GerBI-GMB, c/o University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Universitätsstrasse 10, 78464, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ivanova A, Kalaidzidis Y, Dirkx R, Sarov M, Gerlach M, Schroth-Diez B, Müller A, Liu Y, Andree C, Mulligan B, Münster C, Kurth T, Bickle M, Speier S, Anastassiadis K, Solimena M. Age-dependent labeling and imaging of insulin secretory granules. Diabetes 2013; 62:3687-96. [PMID: 23929935 PMCID: PMC3806613 DOI: 10.2337/db12-1819] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
Insulin is stored within the secretory granules of pancreatic β-cells, and impairment of its release is the hallmark of type 2 diabetes. Preferential exocytosis of newly synthesized insulin suggests that granule aging is a key factor influencing insulin secretion. Here, we illustrate a technology that enables the study of granule aging in insulinoma cells and β-cells of knock-in mice through the conditional and unequivocal labeling of insulin fused to the SNAP tag. This approach, which overcomes the limits encountered with previous strategies based on radiolabeling or fluorescence timer proteins, allowed us to formally demonstrate the preferential release of newly synthesized insulin and reveal that the motility of cortical granules significantly changes over time. Exploitation of this approach may enable the identification of molecular signatures associated with granule aging and unravel possible alterations of granule turnover in diabetic β-cells. Furthermore, the method is of general interest for the study of membrane traffic and aging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Ivanova
- Molecular Diabetology, Paul Langerhans Institute Dresden, Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany
- International Max Planck Research School, Dresden, Germany
| | - Yannis Kalaidzidis
- Max Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics, Dresden, Germany
- A. N. Belozersky Institute of Physico-Chemical Biology, Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Ronald Dirkx
- Molecular Diabetology, Paul Langerhans Institute Dresden, Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany
| | - Mihail Sarov
- Max Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics, Dresden, Germany
| | - Michael Gerlach
- Islet Cell Regeneration, Paul Langerhans Institute Dresden, Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany
- Center for Regenerative Therapies Dresden, Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany
| | - Britta Schroth-Diez
- Max Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics, Dresden, Germany
| | - Andreas Müller
- Molecular Diabetology, Paul Langerhans Institute Dresden, Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany
| | - Yanmei Liu
- Molecular Diabetology, Paul Langerhans Institute Dresden, Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany
- Max Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics, Dresden, Germany
| | - Cordula Andree
- Max Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics, Dresden, Germany
| | - Bernard Mulligan
- Molecular Diabetology, Paul Langerhans Institute Dresden, Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany
- Max Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics, Dresden, Germany
| | - Carla Münster
- Molecular Diabetology, Paul Langerhans Institute Dresden, Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany
| | - Thomas Kurth
- Center for Regenerative Therapies Dresden, Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany
| | - Marc Bickle
- Max Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics, Dresden, Germany
| | - Stephan Speier
- Islet Cell Regeneration, Paul Langerhans Institute Dresden, Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany
- Center for Regenerative Therapies Dresden, Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany
| | | | - Michele Solimena
- Molecular Diabetology, Paul Langerhans Institute Dresden, Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany
- Max Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics, Dresden, Germany
- Corresponding author: Michele Solimena,
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Delivani P, Chacón M, Schroth-Diez B, Tolić-Nørrelykke I. Fluorescence Recovery After Photobleaching (FRAP) in the Fission Yeast Nucleus. Bio Protoc 2013. [DOI: 10.21769/bioprotoc.941] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/02/2022] Open
|
7
|
Gerisch G, Ecke M, Wischnewski D, Schroth-Diez B. Different modes of state transitions determine pattern in the Phosphatidylinositide-Actin system. BMC Cell Biol 2011; 12:42. [PMID: 21982379 PMCID: PMC3199247 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2121-12-42] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2011] [Accepted: 10/07/2011] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Background In a motile polarized cell the actin system is differentiated to allow protrusion at the front and retraction at the tail. This differentiation is linked to the phosphoinositide pattern in the plasma membrane. In the highly motile Dictyostelium cells studied here, the front is dominated by PI3-kinases producing PI(3,4,5)tris-phosphate (PIP3), the tail by the PI3-phosphatase PTEN that hydrolyses PIP3 to PI(4,5)bis-phosphate. To study de-novo cell polarization, we first depolymerized actin and subsequently recorded the spontaneous reorganization of actin patterns in relation to PTEN. Results In a transient stage of recovery from depolymerization, symmetric actin patterns alternate periodically with asymmetric ones. The switches to asymmetry coincide with the unilateral membrane-binding of PTEN. The modes of state transitions in the actin and PTEN systems differ. Transitions in the actin system propagate as waves that are initiated at single sites by the amplification of spontaneous fluctuations. In PTEN-null cells, these waves still propagate with normal speed but loose their regular periodicity. Membrane-binding of PTEN is induced at the border of a coherent PTEN-rich area in the form of expanding and regressing gradients. Conclusions The state transitions in actin organization and the reversible transition from cytoplasmic to membrane-bound PTEN are synchronized but their patterns differ. The transitions in actin organization are independent of PTEN, but when PTEN is present, they are coupled to periodic changes in the membrane-binding of this PIP3-degrading phosphatase. The PTEN oscillations are related to motility patterns of chemotaxing cells.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Günther Gerisch
- Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry, Am Klopferspitz 18, 82152 Martinsried, Germany.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Schroth-Diez B, Gerwig S, Ecke M, Hegerl R, Diez S, Gerisch G. Propagating waves separate two states of actin organization in living cells. HFSP J 2009; 3:412-27. [PMID: 20514132 DOI: 10.2976/1.3239407] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2009] [Accepted: 09/08/2009] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
Propagating actin waves are dynamic supramolecular structures formed by the self-assembly of proteins within living cells. They are built from actin filaments together with single-headed myosin, the Arp23 complex, and coronin in a defined three-dimensional order. The function of these waves in structuring the cell cortex is studied on the substrate-attached surface of Dictyostelium cells by the use of total internal reflection fluorescence (TIRF) microscopy. Actin waves separate two areas of the cell cortex from each other, which are distinguished by the arrangement of actin filaments. The Arp23 complex dominates in the area enclosed by a wave, where it has the capacity of building dendritic structures, while the proteins prevailing in the external area, cortexillin I and myosin-II, bundle actin filaments and arrange them in antiparallel direction. Wave propagation is accompanied by transitions in the state of actin with a preferential period of 5 min. Wave generation is preceded by local fluctuations in actin assembly, some of the nuclei of polymerized actin emanating from clathrin-coated structures, others emerging independently. The dynamics of phase transitions has been analyzed to provide a basis for modeling the nonlinear interactions that produce spatio-temporal patterns in the actin system of living cells.
Collapse
|
9
|
Gerisch G, Ecke M, Schroth-Diez B, Gerwig S, Engel U, Maddera L, Clarke M. Self-organizing actin waves as planar phagocytic cup structures. Cell Adh Migr 2009; 3:373-82. [PMID: 19855162 DOI: 10.4161/cam.3.4.9708] [Citation(s) in RCA: 62] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Actin waves that travel on the planar membrane of a substrate-attached cell underscore the capability of the actin system to assemble into dynamic structures by the recruitment of proteins from the cytoplasm. The waves have no fixed shape, can reverse their direction of propagation and can fuse or divide. Actin waves separate two phases of the plasma membrane that are distinguished by their lipid composition. The area circumscribed by a wave resembles in its phosphoinositide content the interior of a phagocytic cup, leading us to explore the possibility that actin waves are in-plane phagocytic structures generated without the localized stimulus of an attached particle. Consistent with this view, wave-forming cells were found to exhibit a high propensity for taking up particles. Cells fed rod-shaped particles produced elongated phagocytic cups that displayed a zonal pattern that reflected in detail the actin and lipid pattern of free-running actin waves. Neutrophils and macrophages are known to spread on surfaces decorated with immune complexes, a process that has been interpreted as "frustrated" phagocytosis. We suggest that actin waves enable a phagocyte to scan a surface for particles that might be engulfed.
Collapse
|
10
|
Bretschneider T, Anderson K, Ecke M, Müller-Taubenberger A, Schroth-Diez B, Ishikawa-Ankerhold HC, Gerisch G. The three-dimensional dynamics of actin waves, a model of cytoskeletal self-organization. Biophys J 2009; 96:2888-900. [PMID: 19348770 DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2008.12.3942] [Citation(s) in RCA: 160] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2008] [Revised: 12/19/2008] [Accepted: 12/23/2008] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Actin polymerization is typically initiated at specific sites in a cell by membrane-bound protein complexes, and the resulting structures are involved in specialized cellular functions, such as migration, particle uptake, or mitotic division. Here we analyze the potential of the actin system to self-organize into waves that propagate on the planar, substrate-attached membrane of a cell. We show that self-assembly involves the ordered recruitment of proteins from the cytoplasmic pool and relate the organization of actin waves to their capacity for applying force. Three proteins are shown to form distinct three-dimensional patterns in the actin waves. Myosin-IB is enriched at the wave front and close to the plasma membrane, the Arp2/3 complex is distributed throughout the waves, and coronin forms a sloping layer on top of them. CARMIL, a protein that links myosin-IB to the Arp2/3 complex, is also recruited to the waves. Wave formation does not depend on signals transmitted by heterotrimeric G-proteins, nor does their propagation require SCAR, a regulator upstream of the Arp2/3 complex. Propagation of the waves is based on an actin treadmilling mechanism, indicating a program that couples actin assembly to disassembly in a three-dimensional pattern. When waves impinge on the cell perimeter, they push the edge forward; when they reverse direction, the cell border is paralyzed. These data show that force-generating, highly organized supramolecular networks are autonomously formed in live cells from molecular motors and proteins controlling actin polymerization and depolymerization.
Collapse
|
11
|
Heinrich D, Youssef S, Schroth-Diez B, Engel U, Aydin D, Blümmel J, Spatz JP, Gerisch G. Actin-cytoskeleton dynamics in non-monotonic cell spreading. Cell Adh Migr 2008; 2:58-68. [PMID: 19262103 DOI: 10.4161/cam.2.2.6190] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
The spreading of motile cells on a substrate surface is accompanied by reorganization of their actin network. We show that spreading in the highly motile cells of Dictyostelium is non-monotonic, and thus differs from the passage of spreading cells through a regular series of stages. Quantification of the gain and loss of contact area revealed fluctuating forces of protrusion and retraction that dominate the interaction of Dictyostelium cells with a substrate. The molecular basis of these fluctuations is elucidated by dual-fluorescence labeling of filamentous actin together with proteins that highlight specific activities in the actin system. Front-to-tail polarity is established by the sorting out of myosin-II from regions where dense actin assemblies are accumulating. Myosin-IB identifies protruding front regions, and the Arp2/3 complex localizes to lamellipodia protruded from the fronts. Coronin is used as a sensitive indicator of actin disassembly to visualize the delicate balance of polymerization and depolymerization in spreading cells. Short-lived actin patches that co-localize with clathrin suggest that membrane internalization occurs even when the substrate-attached cell surface expands. We conclude that non-monotonic cell spreading is characterized by spatiotemporal patterns formed by motor proteins together with regulatory proteins that either promote or terminate actin polymerization on the scale of seconds.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Doris Heinrich
- Department für Physik, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, München, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Abstract
The interaction of a spin-labeled lysophosphatidylcholine analog with intact and bromelain-treated influenza viruses as well as with the bromelain-solubilized hemagglutinin ectodomain has been studied. The inhibition of fusion of influenza viruses with erythrocytes by the lysophosphatidylcholine analog was similar to that observed for non-labeled lysophosphatidylcholine. Only a weak interaction of the lysophosphatidylcholine analog with the hemagglutinin ectodomain was observed even upon triggering the conformational change of the ectodomain at a low pH. A significant interaction of spin-labeled lysophosphatidylcholine with the hemagglutinin ectodomain of intact viruses was observed neither at neutral nor at low pH, whereas a strong interaction of the lipid analog with the viral lipid bilayer was evident. We suggest that the high number of lipid binding sites of the virus bilayer and their affinity compete efficiently with binding sites of the hemagglutinin ectodomain. We conclude that the inhibition of influenza virus fusion by lysolipids is not mediated by binding to the hemagglutinin ectodomain, preventing its interaction with the target membrane. The results unambiguously argue for an inhibition mechanism based on the action of lysolipid inserted into the lipid bilayer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bolormaa Baljinnyam
- Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Fakultät I, Institut für Biologie, Molekulare Biophysik, Invalidenstrasse 42, D-10115 Berlin, Germany
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Schroth-Diez B, Ludwig K, Baljinnyam B, Kozerski C, Huang Q, Herrmann A. The role of the transmembrane and of the intraviral domain of glycoproteins in membrane fusion of enveloped viruses. Biosci Rep 2000; 20:571-95. [PMID: 11426695 DOI: 10.1023/a:1010415122234] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Fusion of enveloped viruses with their target membrane is mediated by viral integral glycoproteins. A conformational change of their ectodomain triggers membrane fusion. Several studies suggest that an extended, triple-stranded rod-shaped alpha-helical coiled coil resembles a common structural and functional motif of the ectodomain of fusion proteins. From that, it is believed that essential features of the fusion process are conserved among the various enveloped viruses. However, this has not been established so far for the highly conserved transmembrane and intraviral sequences of fusion proteins. The article will focus on the role of both sequences in the fusion process. Recent studies from various enveloped viruses strongly imply that a transmembrane domain with a minimum length is required for later steps of membrane fusion, i.e., the formation and enlargement of the aqueous fusion pore. Although no specific sequence of the TM is necessary for pore formation, distinct properties and motifs of the domain may be obligatory to ascertain full fusion activity. However, with some exceptions, the intraviral domain seems to be not required for fusion activity of viral fusion proteins.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B Schroth-Diez
- Institut für Biologie/Biophysik, Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Fakultät I, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Kozerski C, Ponimaskin E, Schroth-Diez B, Schmidt MF, Herrmann A. Modification of the cytoplasmic domain of influenza virus hemagglutinin affects enlargement of the fusion pore. J Virol 2000; 74:7529-37. [PMID: 10906206 PMCID: PMC112273 DOI: 10.1128/jvi.74.16.7529-7537.2000] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
The fusion activity of chimeras of influenza virus hemagglutinin (HA) (from A/fpv/Rostock/34; subtype H7) with the transmembrane domain (TM) and/or cytoplasmic tail (CT) either from the nonviral, nonfusogenic T-cell surface protein CD4 or from the fusogenic Sendai virus F-protein was studied. Wild-type or chimeric HA was expressed in CV-1 cells by the transient T7-RNA-polymerase vaccinia virus expression system. Subsequently, the fusion activity of the expression products was monitored with red blood cells or ghosts as target cells. To assess the different steps of fusion, target cells were labeled with the fluorescent membrane label octadecyl rhodamine B-chloride (R18) (membrane fusion) and with the cytoplasmic fluorophores calcein (molecular weight [MW], 623; formation of small aqueous fusion pore) and tetramethylrhodamine-dextran (MW, 10,000; enlargement of fusion pore). All chimeric HA/F-proteins, as well as the chimera with the TM of CD4 and the CT of HA, were able to mediate the different steps of fusion very similarly to wild-type HA. Quite differently, chimeric proteins with the CT of CD4 were strongly impaired in mediating pore enlargement. However, membrane fusion and formation of small pores were similar to those of wild-type HA, indicating that the conformational change of the ectodomain and earlier fusion steps were not inhibited. Various properties of the CT which may affect pore enlargement are considered. We surmise that the hydrophobicity of the sequence adjacent to the transmembrane domain is important for pore dilation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Kozerski
- Institut für Biologie/Biophysik, Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Fakultät I, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, D-10115 Berlin, Germany
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Abstract
The influenza virus hemagglutinin (HA) contains three highly conserved cysteine residues at positions 551, 559, and 562 close to the carboxyl-terminus of the HA2 subunit which serve as palmitylation sites. Wild-type HA of influenza virus A/FPV/Rostock/34 (H7N1) and HA permutated by exchange of the acylated cysteine to serine residues were expressed in CV-1 cells by a SV40 vector system. Since density of immunostained HA on the cell surface measured by flow cytometric analysis did not differ between wild-type and acylation mutants, it was possible to compare acylation mutants and wild-type HA for their capacity to induce membrane fusion at low pH. The following observations were made: (1) lateral diffusion of a lipid-like fluorophore (R-18) from the erythrocyte membrane to the plasma membrane of cells expressing HA on the surface occurred equally well with mutants and wild type. (2) Diffusion of a low-molecular-weight fluorescent water-soluble probe (calcein) from erythrocytes into the cytoplasm of HA-expressing cells was not altered either. (3) However, depending on the position and the number of the deleted acylation sites, the mutants showed a reduced ability to induce syncytia. The data indicate that deacylation of the cytoplasmic tail has no measurable effect on the capacity of HA to induce membrane fusion and pore formation but that it suppresses syncytia formation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Fischer
- Institut für Virologie, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Marburg, 35011, Germany
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Schroth-Diez B, Ponimaskin E, Reverey H, Schmidt MF, Herrmann A. Fusion activity of transmembrane and cytoplasmic domain chimeras of the influenza virus glycoprotein hemagglutinin. J Virol 1998; 72:133-41. [PMID: 9420208 PMCID: PMC109357 DOI: 10.1128/jvi.72.1.133-141.1998] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
The role of the sequence of transmembrane and cytoplasmic/intraviral domains of influenza virus hemagglutinin (HA, subtype H7) for HA-mediated membrane fusion was explored. To analyze the influence of the two domains on the fusogenic properties of HA, we designed HA-chimeras in which the cytoplasmic tail and/or transmembrane domain of HA was replaced with the corresponding domains of the fusogenic glycoprotein F of Sendai virus. These chimeras, as well as constructs of HA in which the cytoplasmic tail was replaced by peptides of human neurofibromin type 1 (NF1) or c-Raf-1, NF78 (residues 1441 to 1518), and Raf81 (residues 51 to 131), respectively, were expressed in CV-1 cells by using the vaccinia virus-T7 polymerase transient-expression system. Wild-type and chimeric HA were cleaved properly into two subunits and expressed as trimers. Membrane fusion between CV-1 cells and bound human erythrocytes (RBCs) mediated by parental or chimeric HA proteins was studied by a lipid-mixing assay with the lipid-like fluorophore octadecyl rhodamine B chloride (R18). No profound differences in either extent or kinetics could be observed. After the pH was lowered, the above proteins also induced a flow of the aqueous fluorophore calcein from preloaded RBCs into the cytoplasm of the protein-expressing CV-1 cells, indicating that membrane fusion involves both leaflets of the lipid bilayers and leads to formation of an aqueous fusion pore. We conclude that neither HA-specific sequences in the transmembrane and cytoplasmic domains nor their length is crucial for HA-induced membrane fusion activity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B Schroth-Diez
- Institut für Biologie/Biophysik, Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Fakultät I, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Germany
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Nur-E-Kamal MS, Reverey H, Ponimaskin E, Schroth-Diez B, Herrmann A, Schmidt MF. Targeted delivery of human neurofibromin and c-Raf-1 mutants to the cytoplasmic membrane by use of the influenza virus hemagglutinin. Biochim Biophys Acta 1997; 1338:233-43. [PMID: 9128141 DOI: 10.1016/s0167-4838(96)00206-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
Mutants of human neurofibromin and c-Raf-1 genes were fused to the 3' end of the hemagglutinin (HA) gene of influenza A virus by oligonucleotide-directed polymerase chain reaction (PCR). The two resulting chimeric genes, HA (1-534)/NF1 (1441-1518) and HA (1-534)/Raf-1 (51-132) which we designated HN and HR, respectively, were cloned in a vaccinia virus expression vector (pTMI) under the control of a T7 RNA polymerase promoter. The clones were expressed in a monkey cell line (CV-1) and the resulting chimeric proteins analysed. We found that expression levels of the chimeric proteins were similar to that of wild-type HA protein. Comparative endoglycosidase treatment revealed that the expressed chimeric proteins HN and HR were processed as wild-type HA, and FACS-analysis showed that both chimeric expression products localised in the cell membrane as the wild-type control. HN and HR expressing cells showed similar fusogenic activity as CV-1 cells transfected with wild-type HA indicating the correct topology of the fusion inducing portion (HA) of these chimera in the membrane. These findings show that the influenza virus hemagglutinin (HA) is a suitable vehicle to target foreign proteins with therapeutical potential into the cell membrane. In this respect HN and HR could potentially be used to block the abnormal signals generated by particular proteins in the cell membrane that lead to cell transformation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M S Nur-E-Kamal
- Institut für Immunologie und Molekularbiologie, Fachbereich Veterinämedizin der Freien Universität Berlin, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|