Use of self-help groups by people living with HIV in Central America

Self-help groups (SHGs) for people living with HIV (PLHIV) are organizations created by the community to provide individuals with security, affection, improved self-esteem, and a sense of belonging. However, SHGs have also been used by the government to help implement HIV control policies. This study aimed to identify the characteristics associated with the use of SHGs by PLHIV and the routes and displacement patterns adopted by users. An analytical cross-sectional study was conducted based on data collected in six Central American countries during 2012. Using a list of SHGs, a random sampling was conducted in two stages. Firstly, the SHGs were selected. Then, the selected SHGs were visited and every third user who attended the SHG was surveyed. Logistic regression models were used to identify the characteristics associated with the use of SHGs and with attending the nearest SHGs. A spatial analysis was performed to identify the routes followed by users to reach the SHGs from their home communities. We found that the characteristics significantly associated with higher odds of SHG usage were country of residence and schooling level. The average and median distances traveled by users to attend SHGs were 20 and 5 kilometers, respectively. PLHIV do not use the SHGs closest to their locality, perhaps for fear of stigma and discrimination. We recommend that research on this topic use a mixed qualitative-quantitative methodology to better understand utilization decisions, user expectations, and the degree to which these are being met.

[Collateral effect of transnational migration: the transformation of medical habitus]

OBJECTIVE

To analyze health practice transformations in health providers in Mexico.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

. We used qualitative data to explore transnational health practices of men with migration experience to the US, healthcare professionals in Mexico from eight rural communities, and Mexican providers in US. Data used came from a study that explored transnational health practices in the context of migration.

RESULTS

Healthcare professionals provided care to migrants through remote consultations or via a family member, and in-person during migrants' visits or by health-care professionals relocating to migrants' destination com-munities in the US. The remote consultations mainly caused three changes in the field of medical practice: providing care without a patient review or clinical examination, long-distance prescription of medications, and provision of care mediated by a family member.

CONCLUSIONS

Changes in their medical practice shifted roles of healthcare professionals and of migrants as patients, transforming the hegemonic biomedical model in Mexico.

Perceived risks and barriers to care for international migrants in transit through Mexico

Background

Mexico has implemented policies seeking to reduce barriers to care for migrants in transit; however, it is estimated that only 3% of migrants use public health services when needed. The main purpose of this study was to identify the barriers to access public health services faced by migrants in transit through Mexico.

Methods

Under the human security perspective, in 2018, a qualitative study was carried out in Mexican communities with high migrant mobility. 34 semi-structured interviews were conducted with migrants in transit, and personnel from public health services and migrant shelters (NGOs). Values and meanings related to risks, health problems, barriers to care, experiences of health services utilization, and opinions on facilitating elements to diminish these barriers were identified.

Results

Migrants in transit through Mexico face risks that affect all dimensions of human security. Perceived anti-migratory and discriminative attitudes during the journey were constantly mentioned in the interviews. Barriers to care were found in the four stages of health care access, classified according to the Tanahashi framework, with the majority related to accessibility and acceptability. The following facilitating elements were also identified: political willingness of local government, knowledge and talent management of health personnel, and strategies implemented for adapting local health care services to migrants.

Conclusions

Social and political conditions in Mexico disrupt any effort to reduce social risks and barriers to care for migrants in transit. Non-governmental actors are key players for facilitating interactions between migrants and local governmental health care institutions. However, the general anti-migratory context negatively affects access to health care and influence the perspectives of migrants, NGOs, and health personnel.

Key messages

The predominant perceived barriers to care are in counterpoint to local governmental pro-migrant rights perspectives. NGOs are key actors to promote access to public health care services.

Transnationalism and health: A systematic literature review on the use of transnationalism in the study of the health practices and behaviors of migrants

Transnationalism explores social, economic and political processes that occur beyond national borders and has been widely used in migration studies. We conducted a systematic review to explore if and how transnationalism has been used to study migrants' health and what a transnational perspective contributes to understanding health practices and behaviors of transnational migrants. We identified 26 empirical studies published in peer-reviewed journals that included a transnational perspective to study migrants' health practices and behaviors. The studies describe the ways in which migrants travel back and forth between countries of destination to countries of origin to receive health care, for reasons related to cost, language, and perceptions of service quality. In addition, the use of services in countries of origin is related to processes of social class transformation and reclaiming of social rights. For those migrants who cannot travel, active participation in transnational networks is a crucial way to remotely access services through phone or email, and to acquire medical supplies and other health-related goods (traditional medicine, home remedies). We conclude with recommendations for future research in this area.

Salud mental de migrantes centroamericanos indocumentados en tránsito por la frontera sur de México

Objetivo. Conocer las necesidades percibidas de salud mental de migrantes centroamericanos indocumentados en tránsito por la ciudad de Tapachula, Chiapas. Material  y métodos. Estudio cualitativo realizado en Casa de Migrantes de Tapachula, Chiapas. Se realizaron 20 entrevistas semiestructuradas a diez mujeres y diez hombres migrantes. Se exploró el estado de salud mental y las expectativas de atención. Se retomaron nociones teórico-metodológicas de la fenomenología sociológica. Resultados. Los migrantes presentaban signos y síntomas de daños en su salud mental relacionados con experiencias vividas en el lugar de origen y en el tránsito por México. La percepción sobre su salud mental es influida por el modelo biomédico hegemónico. Las expectativas de servicios se relacionaron con la satisfacción de necesidades básicas. Conclusiones. Es necesario fortalecer la respuesta del sistema de atención en salud mental a partir de estrategias de cooperación y emprender acciones que promuevan la superación de una construcción biomédica de salud mental que estigmatiza, medicaliza, segrega y dificulta el acceso a servicios.

Inequidad persistente en salud y acceso a los servicios para los pueblos indígenas de México, 2006-2012

Objetivo. Analizar la situación socioeconómica, de salud y acceso a servicios en población indígena de México, en 2006 y 2012. Material y métodos. Análisis comparativo entre población indígena y no indígena, a partir de información sociodemográfica y de salud de la ENSANUT 2006 y 2012. Se estimaron diferencias de proporciones o medias al comparar indígenas/no indígenas para cada año y entre 2006 y 2012. Resultados. Del total de la población indígena de México, 60% se ubica en el nivel socioeconómico más bajo. El Seguro Popular incrementó su cobertura de 14 a 61.9% en población indígena en comparación con la no indígena (de 10 a 35.7%). Sin embargo, no se observan cambios en utilización de servicios ambulatorios de salud (de 7.1 a 6.4%). La atención hospitalaria del parto en indígenas aumentó (de 63.8 a 76.4%) y persiste diferencia con no indígenas (93.9%). Conclusiones. Incrementar la cobertura del Seguro Popular presenta resultados heterogéneos en utilización de servicios de salud, mientras que el Programa Oportunidades no incide en mejoría de condición socioeconómica de población indígena.

[Persisting health and health access inequalities in Mexican indigenous population, 2006-2012]

OBJECTIVE

To analyze socioeconomic, health conditions and access to health services of Mexican indigenous population between 2006 and 2012.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A comparative analysis was done between indigenous and non indigenous population, using the information from th National Health and Nutrition Survey (2006 and 2012).

RESULTS

60% of the indigenous population was allocated at the poorest socioeconomic level in 2012 despite the implementation of social programs. The Seguro Popular increased its coverage from 14 to 61.9% in indigenous population. The increase observed in coverage in no indigenous population was from 10 to 35.7%. Nevertheless, no increase was observed in the utilization of healthcare services between indigenous and non indigenous population. The access to hospital services for childbirth delivery increased from 63.8 to 76.4% in indigenous population. However there is an important difference with non indigenous population (93.9%).

CONCLUSIONS

The increase in the coverage of the Seguro Popular in Mexico has had heterogeneous results in the utilization of health care services. Other social programs such a Oportunidades have not had an impact to alleviate poverty in indigenous groups.

[Health services in the Mixteca: use and conditions of affiliation in US-migrant and non-migrant households]

OBJECTIVE

To describe the socioeconomic and demographic characteristics of households in the Mixteca Baja and analyze differences in affiliation with health care programs and utilization, among members of households with migrants (HogMig) and without migrants (HogNoMig) to the United States.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A cross-sectional, descriptive survey was used with heads of households in a representative sample from the Mixteca Baja of 702 homes with and without migrants to the US.

RESULTS

Members of HogMig had more personal and economic resources than those of HogNoMig; they also regularly received remittances. The majority of members of both HogMig and HogNoMig did not receive benefits from the Oportunidades program or health coverage through Seguro Popular, IMSS or ISSSTE. In general, while they used the local health clinic, they often preferred to pay for private practitioners. A small proportion of those covered by IMSS or ISSSTE reported very low utilization of the health services offered by those institutions.