Efficacy and safety of Everolimus and Exemestane in hormone-receptor positive (HR+) human-epidermal-growth-factor negative (HER2-) advanced breast cancer patients: New insights beyond clinical trials. The EVA study

BACKGROUND

The BOLERO-2 trial reported efficacy and safety of Everolimus (EVE) and Exemestane (EXE) combination in HR+ advanced breast cancer (ABC) patients. The BALLET trial further evaluated the safety of EVE-EXE in HR+ ABC patients, without reporting efficacy data. Aim of the EVA real-life study was to collect data of efficacy and safety of EVE-EXE combination in the clinical setting, as well as exploring efficacy according to EVE Dose-Intensity (DI) and to previous treatment with Fulvestrant.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This study aimed to describe the outcome of ABC pts treated with EVE-EXE combination in terms of median duration of EVE treatment and ORR in a real-life setting.

RESULTS

From July 2013 to December 2015, the EVA study enrolled 404 pts. Median age was 61 years (33-83). Main metastatic sites were: bone (69.1%), soft tissue (34.7%) and viscera (33.2%). Median number of previous treatments was 2 (1-7). 43.3% of the pts had received Fulvestrant. Median exposure to EVE was 31.0 weeks (15.4-58.3) in the whole population. No difference was observed in terms of EVE exposure duration according to DI (p for trend = 0.27) or type of previous treatments (p = 0.33). ORR and Disease Control Rate (DCR) were observed in 31.6% and 60.7% of the patients, respectively, with the lowest ORRs confined in CHT pre-treated patients or in those who received the lowest DI of EVE. Grade 3-4 adverse events (AEs) were reported in 37.9% of the patients. Main AEs were: stomatitis (11.2%), non-infectious pneumonitis - NIP (3.8%), anaemia (3.8%) and fatigue (3.2%).

CONCLUSIONS

The EVA study provided new insights in the use of EVE-EVE combination in HR+ ABC pts many years after the publication of the pivotal trial. The combination is safe and the best response could be obtained in patients receiving the full dose of EVE and/or after hormone-therapy as Fulvestrant in ABC.

Abstract P4-13-15: Dose intensity and efficacy of the combination of everolimus and exemestane (EVE/EXE) in a real world population of hormone receptor positive advanced breast cancer: A multicenter Italian experience

BACKGROUND: Everolimus, an mTOR inhibitor, in combination with exemestane is approved for hormone receptor (HR) positive advanced breast cancer (ABC), after failure of treatment with non-steroidal aromatase inhibitor (NSAI). We assessed the toxicity of the combination and the correlation between dose intensity and response to therapy, in a real world population of ABC from 11 Italian centers. Moreover, we evaluated OS of the whole population, RR and PFS according to line of treatment (from 1rd to 3th and from 4th on).

METHODS: 154 pts were treated with combination of everolimus 10 mg and exemestane 25 mg daily from 05/2011 today. Median age was 62 (47-82). Median time to metastatic disease was 49 months (0-269). Median number of metastatic sites was 2 (55.2% of pts visceral versus 44.8% non visceral disease). N=117 (75.9%) pretreated with HT as adjuvant; N=126 pts (81.8%) treated with HT for advanced disease prior to EVE/EXE, with a median of one line (0-5). N=102 pts (66.2%) treated with chemotherapy for metastatic disease, with a median of one line (0-6) before everolimus treatment.

RESULTS: Sixteen pts received EVE/EXE as 1st line (10.4%), 39 as 2nd (25.3%), 37 as 3rd (24%), 62 as 4th or more (40,3%). Response was evaluable in 127 out of 154 pts; CR/PR/SD respectively 5/27/56 pts. RR according to line (from 1st to 3rd vs ≥ 4th) was respectively 22.8% vs 26.4% (p=0,864). The median PFS for all population (150 pts) was 38 weeks (95% CI: 33-42). The PFS according to line (1st- 3rd vs ≥ 4th) was 38 wks in both subgroups, p=0.73. OS (126/154 pts) was 28 mths (95% CI: 31-38). The most frequent adverse events were collected in the table.

Adverse eventsOverall %Grade 3-4 %Stomatitis55.810.4Hypercholesterolemia47.40.0Asthenia42.95.2Hyperglycemia36.45.8Hypertriglyceridemia29.20.6Anemia28.63.9Peripheral edema24.71.3Rash23.40.6Increased ALT/AST/GGT21.46.5Thrombocytopenia19.53.9Diarrhea18.81.9Weight loss18.21.3Dysgeusia17.50.6Pneumonitis15.61.9Cutaneous toxicity14.90.6Infection14.33.2Neutropenia11.71.9Nausea11.70.0Anorexia (without stomatitis)10.41.3Electrolyte alterations9.71.3Urea/creatinine increase6.51.3Vomiting6.50.0Uric acid increase4.50.0

Median duration of treatment with everolimus 10 mg and 5 mg was respectively 180 (9-854) and 129 days (3-738). Fifty-eight pts (37,6%) never stopped treatment with everolimus 10 mg; 16 pts (10,4%) definitively stopped everolimus for toxicity; 80 pts (52,0%) temporarily interrupted the treatment, resuming at dose level 10 mg (31 pts) or reducing at 5 mg (49 pts). Main reason for discontinuation/interruption was stomatitis G2-G3. RR and PFS evaluated according to dose intensity, 10 mg vs 5 mg, were respectively 25.9% vs 30% p=0.779, 38 wks (27-44) vs 40 wks (31-48) P=0.614

CONCLUSIONS: efficacy in terms of RR and PFS of the combination EVE/EXE is not related to dose intensity (10 mg vs 5 mg), the discontinuation of the treatment is high with the starting dose of 10 mg, the toxicity is consistent with previous phase II-III studies although we collected some different toxicities.

Citation Format: Forcignanò R, Petrucelli L, Cazzaniga ME, Lupo LI, Chiuri VE, Cairo G, De Matteis E, Febbraro A, Giordano G, Campidoglio S, Fabi A, Giampaglia M, Bilancia D, La Verde N, Maiello E, Morritti M, Giotta F, Lorusso V, Scavelli C, Romito S, Cusmai A, Palmiotti G, Tornesello A, Ciccarese M. Dose intensity and efficacy of the combination of everolimus and exemestane (EVE/EXE) in a real world population of hormone receptor positive advanced breast cancer: A multicenter Italian experience. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-13-15.

Vasculogenic mimicry by bone marrow macrophages in patients with multiple myeloma

Bone marrow macrophages of patients with active and nonactive multiple myeloma (MM), monoclonal gammopathies of undetermined significance (MGUS) and benign anemia (controls) were stimulated for 7 days with vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF), and analysed for the expression of endothelial cell (EC) markers by reverse transcription (RT)-PCR, real-time RT-PCR, western blot and immunofluorescence. Their vasculogenic ability was investigated in vitro in a Matrigel assay and in vivo on bone marrow biopsies through dual immunofluorescence and confocal laser microscopy. Active MM macrophages exposed to VEGF and bFGF acquired EC markers and formed capillary-like structures mimicking paired bone marrow ECs (multiple myeloma patient-derived endothelial cells, MMECs), with major responsiveness compared to macrophages from nonactive MM, MGUS or controls. Bone marrow biopsies of active MM harbored 'mosaic' vessels, being formed by MMECs, EC-like macrophages and macrophages themselves. These figures were rare in nonactive MM and absent in MGUS or controls. Our data indicate that macrophages contribute to build neovessels in active MM through vasculogenic mimicry, and this ability proceeds parallel to progression of the plasma cell tumors. Macrophages may be a target for the MM antivascular treatment.

Crosstalk between angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis in tumor progression

Extensive studies have identified reliable markers of lymphatic endothelial cells, and mechanisms and molecules that regulate development and growth of the lymphatic vessels. Vascular endothelial growth factors (VEGF)-C and VEGF-D, and their cognate receptor tyrosine kinase, VEGF receptor-3 (VEGFR-3), are critical regulators of lymphangiogenesis. By binding to its endothelial cell surface receptors VEGFR-1 and VEGFR-2, VEGF-A mediates vascular leakage, endothelial proliferation and migration. Angiopoietin-2 (Ang-2) is expressed at sites of blood vessel remodeling and invasion, and factors that induce angiogenesis in vivo, such as VEGF-A, upregulate Ang-2 in endothelial cells. In this review, we summarize the literature concerning the crosstalk between angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis in tumor progression, that is, involvement of VEGF-C, VEGF-D and VEGFR-3 in angiogenesis, and the role played by VEGF-A and Ang-2 in lymphangiogenesis, respectively.