Nevirapine pharmacokinetics in HIV-infected persons receiving rifapentine and isoniazid for TB prevention

BACKGROUND

The use of rifamycin antibiotics for TB prevention carries a risk of detrimental drug-drug interactions with concomitantly used ART.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the interaction of the antiretroviral drug nevirapine in combination with 4 weeks of daily rifapentine and isoniazid for TB prevention in people living with HIV.

METHODS

Participants were individuals enrolled in the BRIEF-TB study receiving nevirapine and randomized to the rifapentine/isoniazid arm of the study. Participants provided sparse pharmacokinetic (PK) sampling at baseline and weeks 2 and 4 for trough nevirapine determination. Nevirapine apparent oral clearance (CL/F) was estimated and the geometric mean ratio (GMR) of CL/F prior to and during rifapentine/isoniazid was calculated.

RESULTS

Seventy-eight participants had evaluable PK data: 61 (78%) female, 51 (65%) black non-Hispanic and median (range) age of 40 (13-66) years. Median (IQR) nevirapine trough concentrations were: week 0, 7322 (5266-9302) ng/mL; week 2, 5537 (3552-8462) ng/mL; and week 4, 5388 (3516-8243) ng/mL. Sixty out of 78 participants (77%) had nevirapine concentrations ≥3000 ng/mL at both week 2 and 4. Median (IQR) nevirapine CL/F values were: week 0 pre-rifapentine/isoniazid, 2.03 (1.58-2.58) L/h; and during rifapentine/isoniazid, 2.62 (1.81-3.42) L/h. The GMR (90% CI) for nevirapine CL/F was 1.30 (1.26-1.33).

CONCLUSIONS

The CL/F of nevirapine significantly increased with concomitant rifapentine/isoniazid. The decrease in nevirapine trough concentrations during rifapentine/isoniazid therapy suggests induction of nevirapine metabolism, consistent with known rifapentine effects. The magnitude of this drug-drug interaction suggests daily rifapentine/isoniazid for TB prevention should not be co-administered with nevirapine-containing ART.

Pharmacokinetics of tenofovir during pregnancy and postpartum

OBJECTIVES

Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) is increasingly used in the highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) regimens of pregnant women, but limited data exist on the pregnancy pharmacokinetics of chronically dosed TDF. This study described tenofovir pharmacokinetics during pregnancy and postpartum.

METHODS

International Maternal Pediatric and Adolescent AIDS Clinical Trials (IMPAACT) P1026s is a prospective, nonblinded pharmacokinetic study of HIV-infected pregnant women that included a cohort receiving 300 mg TDF once daily. Steady-state 24-hour pharmacokinetic profiles were measured at the second and third trimesters, postpartum, and in maternal and umbilical cord samples collected at delivery. Tenofovir was measured by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS). The target area under the concentration versus time curve from time 0 to 24 h post dose (AUC) was ≥ 1.99 μg h/mL (nonpregnant historical control 10th percentile).

RESULTS

The median tenofovir AUC was decreased during the second (1.9 μg h/mL) and third (2.4 μg h/mL; P = 0.005) trimesters versus postpartum (3.0 μg h/mL). Tenofovir AUC exceeded the target for two of four women (50%) in the second trimester, 27 of 37 women [73%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 56%, 86%] in the third trimester, and 27 of 32 women (84%; 95% CI 67%, 95%) postpartum (P > 0.05). Median second/third-trimester troughs were lower (39/54 ng/mL) than postpartum (61 ng/mL). Median third-trimester weight was greater for subjects below the target AUC versus those above the target (97.9 versus 74.2 kg, respectively; P = 0.006). The median ratio of cord blood to maternal concentrations was 0.88. No infants were HIV infected.

CONCLUSIONS

This study found lower tenofovir AUC and troughs during pregnancy. Transplacental passage with chronic TDF use during pregnancy was high. Standard TDF doses appear to be appropriate for most HIV-infected pregnant women but therapeutic drug monitoring with dose adjustment should be considered in pregnant women with high weight (> 90 kg) or inadequate HIV RNA response.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of efavirenz and nelfinavir in HIV-infected children participating in an area-under-the-curve controlled trial

Fifty human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected children participated in an area-under-the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC)-controlled trial of efavirenz and nelfinavir. Pharmacokinetic evaluations were performed at weeks 2, 6, and 56. Efavirenz and nelfinavir doses were adjusted to achieve AUC values of 60-120 and > or = 10 mg h/l, respectively. Thirty-seven (74%) children met the efavirenz target and 41 (82%) the nelfinavir by week 10. Children with AUC values for both drugs above the first quartile were more likely to reach < 400 copies/ml of HIV RNA at week 8. Efavirenz and nelfinavir oral clearance increased 37 and 62% from weeks 2 to 56, respectively, in 34 children who continued on therapy at week 56. AUC values at week 56 were not different between children who did or did not have HIV RNA < 400 copies/ml. Dose adjustment to achieve specific AUC values in these children reduced the risk of suboptimal exposure and achieved high rates of virologic suppression.

The effect of lopinavir/ritonavir on the renal clearance of tenofovir in HIV-infected patients

We determined the effects of lopinavir/ritonavir on tenofovir renal clearance. Human immunodeficiency virus-infected subjects taking tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) were matched on age, race, and gender and were enrolled into one of the following two groups: group 1: subjects taking TDF plus lopinavir/ritonavir plus other nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs); group 2: subjects taking TDF plus NRTIs and/or non-NRTIs but no protease inhibitors. Twenty-four-hour blood and urine collections were carried out in subjects for tenofovir quantification. Drug transporter genotype associations with tenofovir pharmacokinetics were examined. In 30 subjects, median (range) tenofovir apparent oral clearance, renal clearance, and fraction excreted in urine were 34.6 l/h (20.6-89.5), 11.3 l/h (6.2-22.6), and 0.33 (0.23-0.5), respectively. After adjusting for renal function, tenofovir renal clearance was 17.5% slower (P=0.04) in subjects taking lopinavir/ritonavir versus those not taking a protease inhibitor, consistent with a renal interaction between these drugs. Future studies should clarify the exact mechanism and whether there is an increased risk of nephrotoxicity.

Combination therapy with saquinavir soft gelatin capsules in children with human immunodeficiency virus infection

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the pharmacokinetics, tolerance, safety and antiviral activity of the HIV protease inhibitor, saquinavir, formulated as soft gelatin capsules (SQV-SGC), given in combination with nucleoside antiretroviral agents (NRTIs) with or without nelfinavir in HIV-infected children.

METHODS

This was an open label study of HIV-infected children ages 3 to 16 years, conducted in two parts. In Part 1 of the study 14 children were treated orally with SQV-SGC (initially given in three 33-mg/kg doses daily; dosage adjusted to 50 mg/kg three times daily based on initial pharmacokinetics) and two NRTIs. Addition of nelfinavir was permitted for children who did not achieve a predetermined steady state target plasma saquinavir exposure. In Part 2 a new group of 13 children received SQV-SGC (33 mg/kg three times daily) in combination with nelfinavir and one or two NRTIs. Pharmacokinetics were assessed after the first dose and 4 weeks into treatment (steady state). Patients were treated for 72 and 48 weeks in Parts 1 and 2, respectively.

RESULTS

Most adverse events were mild; the most commonly reported were diarrhea, abdominal discomfort and headache. Two children were withdrawn from the study because of adverse events (one each of nausea and dysphagia) related to the study treatment. There were no deaths or serious adverse events attributed to the study medication. Steady state saquinavir area under the plasma concentration vs. time curves (AUC24) were 6,210 and 11,010 ng/h/ml for Parts 1 and 2, respectively. Compared with baseline measurements median changes in plasma HIV RNA concentrations were -2.12 log10 copies/ml [5 of 14 (36%) with HIV RNA <50 copies/ml) (Week 72)] and -2.58 log10 copies/ml [8 of 13 (62%) <50 copies/ml) (Week 48)] in Parts 1 and 2, respectively. The median changes in CD4+ lymphocyte count were +292 and +154 cells/microl for Parts 1 and 2, respectively. Genotypic resistance assays revealed a low frequency of saquinavir-associated resistance mutations after 48 weeks of therapy, with only 2 of 27 children having substitutions at positions 48V and/or 90M.

CONCLUSIONS

Combination therapy with SQV-SGC was well-tolerated and safe in HIV-infected children, and antiviral activity was observed. Saquinavir plasma concentrations were lower than expected, particularly for Part 1 (SQV-SGC plus NRTIs), but addition of nelfinavir increased saquinavir exposures.

Pharmacological basis for concentration-controlled therapy with zidovudine, lamivudine, and indinavir

Conventional antiretroviral therapy involves administration of standard fixed doses to adults and adolescents. This approach ignores interindividual variability in pharmacokinetics and results in substantial differences in systemic concentrations among patients. Thus, variability in systemic concentrations contributes to variability in response to therapy. This study was designed to evaluate the feasibility and safety of a regimen of zidovudine, lamivudine, and indinavir designed to achieve select target concentrations versus standard dose therapy. Twenty-four antiretroviral-naïve subjects completed the 24-week study; 13 received standard therapy, and 11 received concentration-controlled therapy. There were no differences in baseline characteristics. Oral clearance for all three drugs was not different between weeks 2 and 28; average ratios of week 2 oral clearance to week 28 oral clearance were 0.95, 1.09, and 1.06 for zidovudine, lamivudine, and indinavir, respectively, with 95% confidence intervals including 1. The selected target concentrations were average steady-state concentrations of 0.19 mg/liter for zidovudine and 0.44 mg/liter for lamivudine and a trough concentration of 0.15 mg/liter for indinavir; mean concentrations achieved at week 28 in the concentration-controlled arm were 0.20, 0.54, and 0.19 mg/liter, respectively. Concentration-controlled therapy significantly reduced interpatient variability in zidovudine concentrations and significantly increased indinavir concentrations. There was no difference in adverse drug effects or adherence. This investigation has provided a pharmacologic basis for concentration-controlled therapy by demonstrating that it is feasible and has a safety profile no different from that of standard therapy. Additional studies to evaluate the virologic effect of the concentration-controlled approach to antiretroviral therapy are warranted.

Recombinant CD4-IgG2 in human immunodeficiency virus type 1-infected children: phase 1/2 study. The Pediatric AIDS Clinical Trials Group Protocol 351 Study Team

The use of recombinant CD4-IgG2 in pediatric human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection was evaluated by single and multidose intravenous infusions in 18 children in a phase 1/2 study. The study drug was well tolerated, and dose proportionality was observed in terms of area under time-concentration curve and peak serum concentration. Acute decreases of >0.7 log(10) copies/mL in serum HIV-1 RNA concentration were seen in 4 of the 6 children treated with 4 weekly 10 mg/kg doses. At 14 days after treatment, 3 children had sustained reductions in serum HIV-1 RNA; the other children had rebounded to baseline levels or above. By 28 days after therapy, the peak HIV-1 cellular infectious units was reduced in all 6 children, including the 2 who had experienced an earlier transient increase in values. Thus, recombinant CD4-IgG2 treatment of HIV-1-infected children appears to be well tolerated and capable of reducing HIV-1 burden.

Patterns of plasma human immunodeficiency virus type 1 RNA response to highly active antiretroviral therapy in infected children

This study examined the rate of decline in plasma human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) RNA levels to <400 and <50 copies/mL in children receiving highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) consisting of efavirenz, nelfinavir, and 1 or 2 nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors. Children receiving HAART achieved a plasma HIV-1 RNA level <400 copies/mL by a median of 4 weeks after initiation of therapy and a decline to <50 copies/mL by 20 weeks. Baseline plasma HIV-1 RNA levels affected the likelihood of achieving potent and sustained virus suppression, and children whose CD4 lymphocyte counts increased >70 cells/microL by 20 weeks on therapy were more likely to achieve durable virological and immunological benefit. These data provide time frames for virus suppression after the initiation of HAART that should be useful in evaluating the potential efficacy and durability of response of newly instituted combination antiretroviral therapy in HIV-1-infected children.

Competing drug-drug interactions among multidrug antiretroviral regimens used in the treatment of HIV- infected subjects: ACTG 884

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the steady state concentrations of saquinavir, ritonavir, nelfinavir, delavirdine, and adefovir in six different three- and four-drug combination regimens.

DESIGN

Randomized, partially double-blinded, multicenter study in a population of indinavir-experienced subjects with virologic failure. The first seven subjects enrolled in each of the six treatment arms from 10 participating sites were entered into this pharmacokinetic evaluation.

SETTING

Multicenter study of the AIDS Clinical Trials Group (ACTG).

PATIENTS

HIV-infected subjects.

INTERVENTIONS

A 12-hour pharmacokinetic study was conducted after 2 weeks of drug administration.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Area under the concentration-time curve with statistical comparisons to evaluate the effect of the second protease inhibitor and the effect of the non-protease inhibitors.

RESULTS

There was no difference in saquinavir concentrations according to whether the second protease inhibitor was ritonavir or nelfinavir. Saquinavir concentrations in the groups receiving the combination of delavirdine plus adefovir dipivoxil were reduced by approximately 50% compared with those receiving delavirdine. Delavirdine concentrations were reduced by approximately 50%, in the delavirdine plus adefovir dipivoxil arms compared with the delavirdine arms.

CONCLUSIONS

Saquinavir concentrations were significantly lower in the arms containing the combination of delavirdine and adefovir dipivoxil compared with the arms containing delavirdine. Delavirdine concentrations were significantly lower when coadministered with adefovir dipivoxil. These drug-drug interactions were not expected, the mechanism(s) is (are) not clear, and additional studies are warranted. This study illustrates the need to understand more fully the pharmacokinetic characteristics of complex combination antiretroviral regimens prior to use in patient management.

Randomized study of saquinavir with ritonavir or nelfinavir together with delavirdine, adefovir, or both in human immunodeficiency virus-infected adults with virologic failure on indinavir: AIDS Clinical Trials Group Study 359

This study compared antiretroviral activity among 6 "salvage" therapy regimens. The study was a prospective, randomized, 2x3 factorial, multicenter study of the AIDS Clinical Trials Group. The study enrolled 277 human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients naive to nonnucleoside analogues who had taken indinavir >6 months. The patients had 2000-200,000 HIV RNA copies/mL. Patients received saquinavir with ritonavir or nelfinavir together with delavirdine and/or adefovir and were followed for safety and antiretroviral response between baseline and week 16. At week 16, 30% (77/254) of patients had </=500 HIV RNA copies/mL. Virologic response did not differ significantly between pooled ritonavir and nelfinavir groups (28% vs. 33%; P=.50) or between pooled delavirdine and delavirdine/adefovir groups (40% vs. 33%; P=.42). Pooled delavirdine groups had a greater virologic response rate than did adefovir groups (40% vs. 18%; P=.002). Overall, one-third of patients who experienced virologic failure on an indinavir-containing regimen suppressed virus load levels while they were taking a new salvage regimen.

Indinavir plasma protein binding in HIV-1-infected adults

OBJECTIVE

To quantify unbound indinavir concentrations and characterize indinavir plasma protein binding in HIV-infected adults.

DESIGN

Pharmacokinetic study in antiretroviral-naive, HIV-infected persons with CD4 T lymphocytes > 100 x 10(6) cells/L and HIV-RNA in plasma >5000 copies/ml at baseline who were participating in an open-label study of zidovudine, lamivudine and indinavir therapy.

METHODS

Eight men underwent 8 h intensive pharmacokinetic studies for indinavir on two occasions 6 months apart. Unbound indinavir was separated by ultra-filtration, and unbound and total concentrations were quantified by a validated high-performance liquid chromatography method.

RESULTS

Overall indinavir protein binding was 61+/-6%, with a range among the profiles of 54 to 70%. Indinavir binding was higher at the 8 h post-dose concentration compared with the 1 h post-dose concentration (66 versus 57%, P = 0.0006).

CONCLUSIONS

The mean 61% protein binding for indinavir in these HIV-infected persons is similar to the in vitro report of 60%. However, the fraction bound was concentration-dependent, and considerable variability in binding was present among patients. Quantification of unbound protease inhibitor concentrations opens new avenues of research to advance our understanding of the pharmacologically-relevant moieties of antiretroviral agents and thereby the pharmacotherapy of HIV infection.

Evidence of a source of HIV type 1 within the central nervous system by ultraintensive sampling of cerebrospinal fluid and plasma

Defining the source of HIV-1 RNA in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) will facilitate studies of treatment efficacy in the brain. Four antiretroviral drug-naive adults underwent two 48-hr ultraintensive CSF sampling procedures, once at baseline and again beginning on day 4 after initiating three-drug therapy with stavudine, lamivudine, and nelfinavir. At baseline, constant CSF HIV-1 RNA concentrations were maintained by daily entry of at least 10(4) to 10(6) HIV-1 RNA copies into CSF. Change from baseline to day 5 ranged from -0.38 to -1.18 log(10) HIV-1 RNA copies/ml in CSF, and from -0.80 to -1.33 log(10) HIV-1 RNA copies/ml in plasma, with no correlation between CSF and plasma changes. There was no evidence of genotypic or phenotypic viral resistance in either CSF or plasma. With regard to pharmacokinetics, mean CSF-to-plasma area-under-the-curve (AUC) ratios were 38.9% for stavudine and 15.3% for lamivudine. Nelfinavir and its active M8 metabolite could not be accurately quantified in CSF, although plasma M8 peak level and AUC(0-8hr) correlated with CSF HIV-1 RNA decline. This study supports the utility of ultraintensive CSF sampling for studying HIV-1 pathogenesis and therapy in the CNS, and provides strong evidence that HIV-1 RNA in CSF arises, at least in part, from a source other than plasma.

Zidovudine triphosphate and lamivudine triphosphate concentration-response relationships in HIV-infected persons

OBJECTIVE

To quantitate intracellular concentrations of zidovudine and lamivudine triphosphate and explore relationships with virologic and immunologic responses to antiretroviral therapy.

DESIGN

Eight antiretroviral-naive, HIV-infected persons with CD4 T cell counts > 100 x 10(6) cells/l, and HIV RNA in plasma > 5000 copies/ml participating in a prospective, randomized, open-label study of standard dose versus concentration-controlled therapy with zidovudine, lamivudine, and indinavir.

METHODS

Peripheral blood mononuclear cells and plasma were collected frequently throughout the study for quantitation of intracellular zidovudine triphosphate and lamivudine triphosphate concentrations, and zidovudine and lamivudine concentrations in plasma. CD4 T cells and HIV RNA in plasma (Roche Amplicor Ultrasensitive Assay) were measured at baseline and every 4 weeks throughout the study. Relationships among intracellular and plasma concentrations, and CD4 T cells and HIV RNA in plasma were investigated with regression analyses.

RESULTS

Significant relationships were observed between the intracellular concentrations of zidovudine triphosphate and lamivudine triphosphate and the baseline level of CD4 cells. Lamivudine triphosphate concentrations were related in a linear manner to the apparent oral clearance of lamivudine from plasma. A direct linear relationship was found between the intracellular concentrations of zidovudine triphosphate and lamivudine triphosphate. The percent change in CD4 cells during therapy and the rate of decline in HIV RNA in plasma were related to the intracellular concentrations of zidovudine triphosphate and lamivudine triphosphate.

CONCLUSION

These studies into the intracellular clinical pharmacology of nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors illustrate potential clinical implications as determinants of therapeutic success. Moreover, these findings provide several leads and a strong impetus for future investigations with nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors particularly when given in combination and sequentially.

A risk-benefit evaluation of aciclovir for the treatment and prophylaxis of herpes simplex virus infections

The objective of this article is to review and evaluate risks and benefits associated with the use of acyclovir in the treatment and prophylaxis of common manifestations of herpes simplex virus (HSV) infections in immunocompetent and immunocompromised patients. Information was found through a MEDLINE search using keywords: herpes simplex virus, genital herpes, herpes labialis, acyclovir and acyclovir. Selected articles were randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, clinical trials. 30 such trials involving 3364 persons were evaluated. All articles were reviewed by the authors and the data were extracted and summarised. In both immunocompetent and immunocompromised hosts, acyclovir therapy demonstrated a high degree of clinical efficacy. None of the studies reported statistically significant differences between acyclovir and placebo for mild or major adverse events. This evaluation found that acyclovir is both effective and well tolerated for treatment and prophylaxis of genital, oral and mucocutaneous HSV infections in immunocompetent and immunocompromised patients. In most clinical scenarios. the benefit of acyclovir exceeded any risks by a comfortable margin. The availability of acyclovir as a generic preparation further improves the benefit to cost ratio.

Semen and serum pharmacokinetics of zidovudine and zidovudine-glucuronide in men with HIV-1 infection

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To characterize the concentration-time profiles of zidovudine and zidovudine-glucuronide in semen and serum of men infected with the human immunodeficiency-1 virus (HIV-1).

DESIGN

Open-label observational study.

SETTING

University-affiliated teaching hospital and research center.

PATIENTS

Four asymptomatic HIV-1-infected men.

INTERVENTIONS

Zidovudine administration was followed by an 8-hour intensive pharmacokinetic study on day 1. Over the next 8 days, a dose administration and timed single-sample strategy was employed to determine serum and semen concentration time profiles simultaneously.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Zidovudine and zidovudine-glucuronide concentrations were uniformly higher in semen than in serum except at 1 hour after the dose. The median area under the curve ratio (semen AUC0-48:serum AUC0-infinity) was 3.31 for zidovudine and 15.04 for zidovudine-glucuronide.

CONCLUSION

Zidovudine and zidovudine-glucuronide reach high levels in seminal plasma relative to serum. The virologic, pharmacodynamic, and public health implications of distribution to this compartment require further study.

Single-dose safety, pharmacology, and antiviral activity of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) type 1 entry inhibitor PRO 542 in HIV-infected adults

PRO 542 (CD4-IgG2) is a recombinant antibody-like fusion protein wherein the Fv portions of both the heavy and light chains of human IgG2 have been replaced with the D1D2 domains of human CD4. Unlike monovalent and divalent CD4-based proteins, tetravalent PRO 542 potently neutralizes diverse primary human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) type 1 isolates. In this phase 1 study, the first evaluation of this compound in humans, HIV-infected adults were treated with a single intravenous infusion of PRO 542 at doses of 0.2-10 mg/kg. PRO 542 was well tolerated, and no dose-limiting toxicities were identified. Area under the concentration-time curve, and peak serum concentrations increased linearly with dose, and a terminal serum half-life of 3-4 days was observed. No patient developed antibodies to PRO 542. Preliminary evidence of antiviral activity was observed as reductions in both plasma HIV RNA and plasma viremia. Sustained antiviral effects may be achieved with repeat dosing with PRO 542.

Pharmacodynamics of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 protease inhibitors

Many factors are involved in the success or failure of antiretroviral therapy. Recent data suggest that there are significant differences in drug absorption and disposition for the protease inhibitor class of antiretroviral drugs, and relationships between plasma concentrations and their antiviral effect have been described. Consequently, the issue of whether therapeutic drug monitoring should be employed for patients receiving treatment with these drugs has arisen. Several criteria must be met before a drug is considered a candidate for therapeutic drug monitoring. These criteria include pharmacological, clinical, and analytic components. Although not all the necessary criteria have yet been met, some of these components have been defined, and additional data are being generated. However, prospectively designed clinical trials must be completed to determine if monitoring protease inhibitor plasma concentrations provides additional clinical benefit to the patient.

Pharmacologic characteristics of indinavir, didanosine, and stavudine in human immunodeficiency virus-infected children receiving combination therapy

The use of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) protease inhibitors in children has lagged behind that in adults because of the lack of suitable pediatric formulations and information on safe and effective dosing regimens. This study was designed to obtain pharmacokinetic information on indinavir, administered to HIV-infected children also receiving therapy with two nucleoside agents, and to explore relationships between pharmacokinetic parameters and anti-HIV effect. Indinavir was initiated at a dose of 500 mg/m(2) every 8 h. Plasma indinavir concentrations were measured every 4 weeks; the dose or dosing interval was adjusted to maintain trough concentrations of > or =0.1 mg/liter. All children were evaluated clinically at baseline and every 4 weeks. Plasma HIV RNA was quantitated at baseline and at weeks 4, 12, and 24. Eighteen children participated in this study. The average daily dose of indinavir was 2,043 mg/m(2); nine children received indinavir at 6-h intervals. Pharmacokinetic characteristics of indinavir (mean +/- standard deviation) were the following: oral clearance, 1.4 +/- 0.5 liters/h/kg; half-life, 1.1 +/- 0.43 h; and trough concentration, 0. 29 +/- 0.32 mg/liter. In nine children that completed 24 weeks of therapy, the baseline-to-week-24 change in HIV RNA level was related to indinavir trough concentration and didanosine area under the curve. This study illustrates the ability to obtain pharmacokinetic information from children during routine clinic visits and to use this information to provide a safeguard against underdosing. The incorporation of pharmacologic knowledge with virologic, immunologic, and behavioral considerations should result in improved clinical outcomes for children infected with HIV.

Use of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) human hyperimmune immunoglobulin in HIV type 1-infected children (Pediatric AIDS clinical trials group protocol 273)

The clinical, immunologic, and virologic effects and the pharmacokinetics of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) human hyperimmune immunoglobulin (HIVIG) were assessed in 30 HIV-infected children aged 2-11 years. All had moderately advanced disease with an immune complex-dissociated (ICD) p24 antigen >70 pg/mL and were on stable antiviral therapy. Three groups of 10 children received 6 monthly infusions of 200, 400, or 800 mg/kg of HIVIG, and serial immunologic and virologic assays were performed. HIVIG doses as high as 800 mg/kg were safe and well tolerated. The half-life of HIVIG, determined by serial p24 antibody titers, was 13-16 days, the volume of distribution was 102-113 mL/kg, and clearance was 5.6-6.0 mL/kg/day. Plasma ICD p24 decreased during the infusions, but CD4 cell levels, plasma RNA copy number, cellular virus, immunoglobulin levels, and neutralizing antibody titers were minimally affected by the infusions. Clinical status did not change during the 6-month infusion and 3-month follow-up periods.

Simultaneous HPLC assay for quantification of indinavir, nelfinavir, ritonavir, and saquinavir in human plasma

BACKGROUND

HIV protease inhibitors are recommended as part of combination antiretroviral therapy. Dual protease inhibitor therapy is also being used clinically. Consequently, a simultaneous assay for indinavir, nelfinavir, ritonavir, and saquinavir was developed.

METHODS

Indinavir, nelfinavir, ritonavir, and saquinavir were extracted from plasma (250 microL) with methyl-t-butyl ether at basic pH after addition of an internal standard (A-86093). The compounds were separated on a Keystone BetaBasic C4 column (250 x 3 mm i.d.) at 40 degrees C with a mobile phase of acetonitrile-50 mmol/L ammonium formate buffer, pH 4.1 (52:48, by volume) at a flow rate of 0.5 mL/min. Indinavir, nelfinavir, ritonavir, and the internal standard (A-86093) were detected at 218 nm, and saquinavir was detected at 235 nm. The method was validated by analysis of five triplicate analyses of calibrators along with quality-control samples at three different concentrations prepared in human plasma.

RESULTS

The extraction recovery was 87-92%. Within-run accuracy for quality-control samples was 6-8%, with CVs of 2-8%. Limits of quantification were 40-50 microg/L for indinavir, nelfinavir, and ritonavir, and 20 microg/L for saquinavir. Cross-validation with a liquid chromatography-mass spectroscopy method for saquinavir and nelfinavir was conducted with patient samples. Regression analysis revealed a good correlation (r(2) >0.94) between methods. Larger variations at concentrations >4000 microg/L were observed with nelfinavir. Interference with drugs commonly used in AIDS patients was not observed. Pharmacokinetic profiles for two patients on dual protease therapy were determined.

CONCLUSIONS

A reliable and rugged simultaneous HPLC assay for four HIV protease inhibitors was developed. The assay method is convenient for clinical laboratories involved in therapeutic drug monitoring for HIV protease inhibitors. The assay has enough sensitivity to conduct pharmacokinetic studies in patients taking more than one HIV protease inhibitor along with other antiretroviral medications.

Combination therapy with efavirenz, nelfinavir, and nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors in children infected with human immunodeficiency virus type 1. Pediatric AIDS Clinical Trials Group 382 Team

BACKGROUND

Consistent long-term viral suppression has been difficult to achieve in children with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection. We tested the safety and antiviral efficacy of a novel combination consisting of efavirenz, nelfinavir, and one or more nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors in 57 children previously treated with only nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors.

METHODS

The children were monitored for 48 weeks after the initiation of therapy. We assessed plasma concentrations of efavirenz and nelfinavir, plasma HIV-1 RNA levels, and lymphocyte subpopulations.

RESULTS

At base line, the 57 HIV-1-infected children (age range, 3.8 to 16.8 years) had a median of 699 CD4 cells per cubic millimeter and 10,000 copies of HIV-1 RNA per milliliter of plasma. The most common treatment-related effects of at least moderate severity were rash (in 30 percent of children), diarrhea (in 18 percent), neutropenia (in 12 percent), and biochemical abnormalities (in 12 percent). Serious side effects were uncommon. The mean values for the area under the curve for efavirenz and nelfinavir corresponded to expected values. In an intention-to-treat analysis, 76 percent of children had plasma HIV-1 RNA levels of less than 400 copies per milliliter after 48 weeks of therapy and 63 percent had levels of less than 50 copies per milliliter. A high plasma HIV-1 RNA level at base line significantly decreased the likelihood that plasma levels of HIV-1 RNA would become undetectable during treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

In HIV-1-infected children who were previously treated with nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors, the combination of efavirenz, nelfinavir, and nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors was generally well tolerated and had a potent and sustained antiviral effect.

Pharmacologic considerations for therapeutic success with antiretroviral agents

OBJECTIVE

To explore pharmacologic elements that contribute to therapeutic success with agents used for the treatment of HIV infection.

DATA SOURCES

Primary articles were identified through MEDLINE (January 1990-January 1999) and secondary sources. Conference abstracts were selected by review of published proceedings.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

The author evaluated all articles, and relevant information was selected for incorporation into this review.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Heterogeneity in the response to antiretroviral therapy has been attributed to virologic, immunologic, behavioral, and pharmacologic differences among patients. Patients receiving the same dose of an antiretroviral agent will not have the same systemic or intracellular concentration because of interpatient variability in drug absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion. Pharmacologic theory and available clinical data support relationships between drug concentration and anti-HIV effect. Thus, variability in drug concentrations contributes to variability in antiviral effect. Desirable pharmacologic characteristics for an antiretroviral drug include high oral bioavailability, a long elimination half-life, low intra- and interpatient pharmacokinetic variability, and a predictable dose-concentration-effect relationship.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment of the individual who is infected with HIV is a challenging long-term undertaking. Optimal management requires synthesis of a rapidly evolving base of basic and clinical knowledge. The selection of an antiretroviral regimen based on an understanding of the degree to which each individual agent possesses the desired pharmacologic characteristics should help the healthcare provider to translate the therapeutic principles of treatment of HIV infection into clinical reality for all patients.

Indinavir concentrations and antiviral effect

STUDY OBJECTIVES

To determine the variability of indinavir pharmacokinetics in patients attending an outpatient clinic, and to explore relationships between indinavir exposure and antiviral effect.

DESIGN

Open, formal pharmacokinetic evaluation.

SETTING

University-affiliated clinical research center.

PATIENTS

Forty-three adults infected with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) receiving therapy with indinavir and concomitant nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors.

INTERVENTION

Indinavir concentrations were measured after patients were observed taking an 800-mg oral dose, and pharmacokinetic parameters were determined using a one-compartment oral absorption model. Virologic and pharmacologic characteristics were compared in a subset of 23 patients who were protease inhibitor naive before receiving indinavir.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Mean indinavir pharmacokinetics were similar to those reported previously. Significant intersubject variability in systemic exposure was observed in patients receiving the same dosage; the 8-hour area under the curve (AUC8) ranged from 5.4-68.0 microM x hour. In protease inhibitor-naive subjects, the indinavir AUC8 was statistically higher in those with undetectable plasma HIV RNA (30.7 microM x hr) versus detectable plasma HIV RNA (22.4 microM x hr, p=0.035). Measured concentrations 5 hours after the dose and extrapolated 8-hour concentrations were also significantly higher in patients with undetectable plasma HIV RNA (both p=0.007).

CONCLUSIONS

Indinavir plasma concentrations were highly variable among patients receiving the same dosage. Patients with an undetectable plasma HIV RNA level who were protease inhibitor naive had statistically higher indinavir concentrations and slower oral clearance than the group with detectable HIV RNA. Relationships between indinavir concentrations and anti-HIV effect provide a basis for quantifying the pharmacologic contribution to the heterogeneity in therapeutic response.

A phase I study of abacavir (1592U89) alone and in combination with other antiretroviral agents in infants and children with human immunodeficiency virus infection. AIDS Clinical Trials Group 330 Team

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the pharmacokinetic features, safety, and tolerance of abacavir, given alone and in combination with other nucleoside antiretroviral agents, in symptomatic human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected children.

METHODS

HIV-infected children discontinued prior antiretroviral therapy and were given abacavir orally, 4 mg/kg every 12 hours for 6 weeks, followed by 8 mg/kg every 12 hours for 6 weeks (n = 39); or 8 mg/kg every 12 hours for 12 weeks (n = 8). Children then were randomized to receive a second nucleoside antiretroviral agent (zidovudine, stavudine, didanosine, or lamivudine), plus abacavir. Pharmacokinetics, safety, tolerance, CD4(+) lymphocyte counts, and plasma HIV RNA concentrations were evaluated.

RESULTS

At a dose of 8 mg/kg every 12 hours, area under the plasma concentration-versus-time curves and plasma half-life values were comparable with those reported for adults receiving abacavir at a dose of 300 mg twice daily. One case each of hypersensitivity reaction and peripheral neuropathy occurred during abacavir monotherapy. Three children experienced neutropenia while receiving abacavir in combination with another antiretroviral agent. Mean CD4(+) lymphocyte count and plasma HIV RNA concentration did not change when prior antiretroviral therapy was changed to abacavir monotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Abacavir therapy is associated with good short-term tolerance and safety in HIV-infected children. Phase III studies are in progress to assess the antiviral activity of abacavir in children and adults.

Concentration-controlled zidovudine therapy

BACKGROUND

Heterogeneity in the response to antiretroviral therapy has been attributed to pharmacologic, immunologic, and virologic differences between patients. Currently available antiretroviral agents used for the treatment of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection in adults are administered in standard fixed doses. The active moiety of nucleoside anti-HIV drugs is the intracellular anabolite. Therefore the heterogeneity in response to nucleoside agents may arise as a result of pharmacologic variability at both the systemic and cellular level.

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether a novel concentration-controlled zidovudine regimen could improve anti-HIV response compared with the standard fixed-dose approach.

DESIGN

At the Outpatient Clinic of the General Clinical Research Center at the University of Minnesota, 20 persons with HIV infection received an oral regimen of zidovudine designed to achieve a target concentration in plasma of 0.7 mumol/L and the 500 mg/day standard dose in a randomized, crossover 24-week study.

RESULTS

The concentration-controlled regimen achieved overall higher systemic concentrations with reduced interpatient variability: steady-state average zidovudine plasma concentrations were 0.76 mumol/L (coefficient of variation, 12%) versus 0.62 mumol/L (coefficient of variation, 32%) for the standard regimen. There was no difference in safety and tolerance between regimens. Intracellular zidovudine triphosphate concentrations averaged 160 fmol/10(6) peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) with concentration-controlled versus 92 fmol/10(6) PBMCs for standard therapy. The percentage change from baseline in CD4 cells was a 22% increase for the concentration-controlled regimen versus a 7% decrease with standard therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

These data indicate that pharmacologic variability affects antiretroviral response. Furthermore, these findings provide a framework to characterize the pharmacologic determinants of effect and quantitate their contribution to the heterogeneity in clinical response to optimize therapeutic benefit.

A pilot study of combination therapy with indinavir, stavudine (d4T), and didanosine (ddI) in children infected with the human immunodeficiency virus

Twelve children infected with the human immunodeficiency virus were treated orally with indinavir, stavudine, plus didanosine for 12 to 48 weeks. Therapy was limited in some cases by nonadherence, intolerance, toxicity, and virologic failure. Marked increases in CD4+ lymphocyte counts and decreases in plasma human immunodeficiency virus RNA concentrations suggest that the regimen has potent antiviral activity.

Pharmacokinetics of hyperimmune anti-human immunodeficiency virus immunoglobulin in persons with AIDS

Hyperimmune anti-human immunodeficiency virus immunoglobulin (HIVIG) is an intravenous immunoglobulin prepared from HIV-infected asymptomatic donors with a CD4 cell count greater than 400 cells/microl and a high titer of antibody to HIV-1 p24 protein. Twelve persons with AIDS received four doses of HMG (two at 50 mg/kg of body weight and then two at 200 mg/kg) every 28 days. Pharmacokinetics were evaluated by measurement of anti-p24 antibody. HIVIG was well tolerated, and all participants completed the study. Three subjects who were not receiving Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia (PCP) prophylaxis developed PCP. The mean value for HIVIG clearance was 3.02 ml/kg/day at 50 mg/kg and 3.65 ml/kg/day at 200 mg/kg (P = 0.027); the mean trough antibody titers (reciprocal units) were 1,442 and 4,428, respectively. This study indicates that high titers of anti-p24 antibody can be maintained with a monthly administration schedule of HIVIG and that short-term safety is acceptable. Comparisons to evaluate the therapeutic potential of HIVIG are justified.

Pharmacokinetics and safety of concentration-controlled oral zidovudine therapy

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the pharmacokinetics, safety, and feasibility of concentration-controlled oral zidovudine therapy.

DESIGN

Randomized, crossover, open-label study.

SETTING

University-affiliated general clinical research center.

PATIENTS

Eight individuals infected with the human immunodeficiency virus with CD4+ lymphocyte counts of 100 cells/microliter or greater.

INTERVENTION

During the 24-week study, patients received oral zidovudine regimens that consisted of a standard fixed dose of 500 mg/day and a concentration-controlled regimen designed to maintain a steady-state plasma concentration (Css) of 0.187 +/- 0.04 mg/L (0.7 +/- 0.14 microM).

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The mean Css during standard therapy was 0.170 +/- 0.024 mg/L versus 0.205 +/- 0.021 mg/L with the concentration-controlled regimen (p = 0.025). Respective mean changes in hemoglobin were -0.02 g/dl (range -0.9-0.9 g/dl) and -0.30 g/dl (range -1.5-0.4 g/dl, p = 0.67). The absolute neutrophil count decreased 0.90 x 10(9)/L during standard therapy and increased 0.40 x 10(9)/L during concentration-controlled therapy (p = 0.07). The regimens did not differ in toxicity.

CONCLUSION

Concentration-controlled oral antiretroviral therapy with zidovudine is feasible and safe, and provides pharmacologic data to determine the regimen's virologic and immunologic benefits.

Safety and pharmacokinetics of hyperimmune anti-human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) immunoglobulin administered to HIV-infected pregnant women and their newborns. Pediatric AIDS Clinical Trials Group Protocol 185 Pharmacokinetic Study Group

The pharmacokinetics and safety of hyperimmune anti-human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) intravenous immunoglobulin (HIVIG) were evaluated in the first 28 maternal-infant pairs enrolled in a randomized, intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG)-controlled trial of HIVIG maternal-infant HIV transmission prophylaxis. Using 200 mg/kg, mean half-life and volume of distribution (Vd) in women were 15 days and 72 mL/kg, respectively, after one and 32 days and 154 mL/kg after three monthly infusions, with stable 4 mL/kg/day clearance. Transplacental passage occurred. Newborn single-dose half-life, Vd, and clearance were 30 days, 143 mL/kg, and 4 mL/kg/day, respectively. HIVIG rapidly cleared maternal serum immune complex-dissociated p24 antigen, and plasma HIV-1 RNA levels were stable. Mild to moderate adverse clinical effects occurred in 2 of 103 maternal and 2 of 25 infant infusions. No adverse hematologic, blood chemistry, or immunologic effects were seen. HIVIG is well-tolerated in HIV-infected pregnant women and their newborns, clears antigenemia, crosses the placenta, and exhibits pharmacokinetics similar to those of other immunoglobulin preparations.

Valacyclovir

OBJECTIVE

To discuss the clinical pharmacology, antiviral activity, clinical efficacy, and other therapeutic issues associated with valacyclovir use for the treatment of herpesvirus infections.

DATA SOURCE

Literature searches using MEDLINE were prospectively designed to include relevant articles and abstracts between January 1982 and March 1996. The searches focused on valacyclovir pharmacology, clinical efficacy, and issues associated with herpesvirus infections.

STUDY SELECTION

Selection of clinical and basic science studies were limited to those focusing on valacyclovir. All articles with pertinent information relevant to the scope of this article were reviewed.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Valacyclovir is an amino acid ester prodrug of acyclovir. It is currently approved for the treatment of herpes zoster infections in immunocompetent adults (1 g p.o. tid for 7 d) and recurrent episodes of genital herpes in immunocompetent adults (500 mg bid for 5 d). Valacyclovir is rapidly and almost completely hydrolyzed to acyclovir prior to systemic exposure. The bioavailability of valacyclovir is 54% compared to approximately 20% for oral acyclovir. At higher dosages (2 g qid), the plasma AUC of acyclovir following oral valacyclovir administration approximates that seen after intravenous administration of 10 mg/kg every 8 hours. Clinical data indicate that valacyclovir is at least as effective as acyclovir in decreasing the duration of pain associated with postherpetic neuralgia, and in reducing time to genital lesion healing and the length of the episode.

CONCLUSIONS

Valacyclovir has improved bioavailability over acyclovir and is at least as efficacious. The favorable safety profile of acyclovir and increased systemic exposure make it a particularly ideal candidate for further studies of herpes group viral infections in immunocompromised patients.

Effect of foscarnet on quantities of cytomegalovirus and human immunodeficiency virus in blood of persons with AIDS

Four intravenous dosages of foscarnet given for 10 days were compared with no therapy in persons with AIDS who had asymptomatic cytomegalovirus (CMV) viremia. CMV viremia was quantitated by endpoint cell dilution microcultures, pp65 antigenemia assay, and measurement of CMV DNA in peripheral blood leukocytes by a quantitative-competitive PCR. Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) viremia was quantitated by endpoint cell dilution microculture, serum p24 antigen assay, and PCR for HIV-1 RNA in plasma. Twenty-seven subjects who had received a median of 22 months of nucleoside antiretroviral therapy were enrolled. Twenty-two subjects received foscarnet, which was well tolerated and decreased the CMV burden, as reflected by all three indicator assays. During the 10 days of dosing, the level of CMV viremia, as measured by 50 percent tissue culture infective doses, decreased from 117.5 to 12.7 (P = 0.001), the amount of CMV DNA decreased from 20,328 copies to 622 copies per 150,000 leukocytes (P = 0.02), and the level of CMV pp65 antigenemia decreased from 14.9 to 1.6 positive peripheral blood mononuclear cells per 50,000 leukocytes (P = 0.008). A significant pharmacodynamic relationship was found between the peak foscarnet concentration and a decrease in the level of CMV antigenemia (P < 0.05). Foscarnet had no effect on quantitative HIV-1 microcultures during the 10 days of treatment, but the HIV-1 p24 antigen level in serum decreased significantly, from 454 to 305 pg/ml (P = 0.01). Also, a significant pharmacodynamic relationship was seen between plasma HIV-1 RNA concentrations and both peak foscarnet concentration (P < 0.01) and the area under the foscarnet time-concentration curve (P < 0.05). Reductions in the levels of CMV and HIV-1 viremia correlated quantitatively with systemic exposure to foscarnet, whereas control subjects actually experienced an increase in CMV and HIV-1 burdens. The dual antiviral activity of foscarnet shown in this trial encourages investigation of its use in combination with other antiretroviral therapies for persons with AIDS.

Variability in zidovudine serum concentrations

This study explored the variability of zidovudine concentrations with computer simulations and measured concentrations. A one-compartment oral absorption model was selected to characterize zidovudine disposition. Mean (+/-standard deviation) values for the pharmacokinetic parameters were taken from the literature. Five different Monte Carlo simulations (50 each) were performed of zidovudine concentrations following repetitive administration of 100-mg oral doses 6 times/day in patients weighing 45-85 kg. A sixth simulation considered a weight-adjusted regimen. Predicted concentrations were compared with those measured in 30 HIV-infected persons receiving 100 mg/dose. Predicted concentrations 1 hour after 100 mg was administered fell in the range of 0.52-5.18 microM; measured values in 30 patients were 0.54-3.07 microM. This study confirms substantial variability in zidovudine serum concentrations. The simulation study of a weight-adjusted regimen suggests one possibility to reduce this variability. These observations provide a basis to explore dosing strategies that control for pharmacokinetic and perhaps pharmacodynamic sources of interpatient variability.

Pharmacologic considerations for antiviral drug development

OBJECTIVE

To discuss pharmacologic considerations for the development of antiviral agents.

DATA SOURCES

English-language literature pertaining to the development and clinical evaluation of antiviral compounds, primarily agents targeted against herpes group viruses and HIV.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

Pertinent information, as judged by the author, was selected for discussion.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Drug development of antiviral agents presents unique problems compared with that of antimicrobial and other agents. Understanding the mechanism of action and both pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic considerations is critical to developing a rational dosing strategy and safe, effective use. The lack of standardized methods for antiviral susceptibility testing and the influence of factors such as strain of virus, host cell type, culture medium, inoculum size, end point, and method of measurement on the results obtained illustrate factors that complicate preclinical pharmacologic analysis of antiviral agents. Acyclovir offers a model for clinical drug development. Its mechanism of action, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics have been studied extensively. Rational guidelines for usage are available, including guidelines in special patient populations such as kidney transplant recipients and neonates. A pregnancy registry has allowed evaluation of the incidence of birth defects in fetuses exposed to systemic acyclovir. Several pitfalls in antiviral drug development are associated with inadequate pharmacologic information. The development of dextran sulfate and fialuridine provides two examples. Integration of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analyses using modern sampling and analysis techniques may facilitate more rapid development of antiviral agents and more informed dosage regimens to achieve the highest probability of therapeutic success.

Combination therapy with stavudine and didanosine in children with advanced human immunodeficiency virus infection: pharmacokinetic properties, safety, and immunologic and virologic effects

OBJECTIVES

To obtain preliminary information on the pharmacokinetic properties, tolerance, safety, and antiviral activity of combination therapy with stavudine and didanosine in children with advanced human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection.

METHODS

Eight children (median age, 6.6 years; range, 2.8 to 12 years) with advanced HIV disease (median CD4 + lymphocyte count at baseline, 42 cells/ microL; range, 8 to 553 cells/microL) were treated with stavudine (2 mg/kg per day in two divided doses) and didanosine (180 mg/m2 per day in two divided doses) for 24 weeks. Seven children had histories of prior zidovudine therapy. All children had received stavudine alone for 19 to 33 months before the addition of didanosine to the treatment regimen. Children were assessed clinically and with laboratory studies at baseline, weekly through week 4 of combination therapy, and every 4 weeks thereafter.

RESULTS

Analysis of stavudine and didanosine plasma half-life values, clearances, and area under the plasma concentration-versus-time curves revealed no obvious clinical pharmacokinetic interaction between the drugs through study week 12. Combination therapy was well tolerated, and there were no drug-associated clinical or laboratory adverse events. Signs and symptoms of peripheral neuropathy were not observed. All three children with baseline CD4 + lymphocyte counts greater than 50 cells/muL had greater than 20% increases in their counts within the first 12 weeks of therapy; CD4 + lymphocyte count increases were not observed in the other children. Plasma HIV RNA concentrations showed median declines of 0.88 log10 (range, -3.41 log10 to 0.31 log10) and 0.30 log10 (range, -0.63 log10 to 0.89 log10) at study weeks 12 and 24, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Combination therapy with stavudine and didanosine was well tolerated and safe in this small group of children with advanced HIV disease. Plasma HIV RNA concentration declines suggest a favorable effect of therapy on virus load. These findings should be confirmed, and the regimen's clinical efficacy should be examined, in controlled studies of HIV-infected children with less-advanced disease.

Clinical pharmacokinetics of zidovudine. An update

The battle against the acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS) is now into its second decade, and substantial advancements have been made in our understanding of the complex life cycle of, and the immunopathology associated with, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, as well as of the drugs used to modify the course of disease. Zidovudine was the first agent approved for treatment of HIV disease, and since its widespread availability in 1987 the pharmacokinetic disposition and clinical effects of zidovudine have been extensively evaluated. This article reviews the absorption, distribution, metabolism and elimination characteristics of zidovudine, focusing on more recent information. In addition, factors that may or may not affect zidovudine disposition are discussed. These include selected drug interactions and concomitant disease states such as renal and hepatic insufficiency. Issues such as bodyweight normalisation, maternal-fetal transfer, pregnancy and intracellular phosphorylation are discussed in relation to the pharmacokinetics and clinical efficacy of zidovudine. Finally, information regarding the clinical pharmacodynamics of zidovudine is presented. This includes possible relationships between zidovudine pharmacokinetics and markers of efficacy and toxicity, and the significance of linking pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic information.

Strategies for control of zidovudine concentrations in serum

There are several clinical scenarios in which knowledge of zidovudine disposition may be important. This study evaluated the clinical utility of pharmacokinetic parameters for zidovudine derived from sparse serum concentration data obtained in an outpatient setting. Twelve human immunodeficiency virus-infected participants had two serum zidovudine concentrations determinations obtained on two different clinic visits, 2 to 38 days apart. Zidovudine concentrations were measured by radioimmunoassay. A one-compartment oral absorption model was used to describe zidovudine disposition. Three different approaches were used to estimate pharmacokinetic parameters: Bayesian estimation with one or two concentrations and least squares with one concentration. The ability of these parameters to predict concentrations measured during the second clinic visit was assessed by calculation of precision and bias and compared with predictions using standard fixed or weight-adjusted parameters. Estimated pharmacokinetic parameters for zidovudine were consistent with literature values; there was no statistically significant difference among the parameters calculated with the three estimation strategies. Absorptive phase concentrations were poorly predicted by all methods (mean percent bias, 157 to 249%; mean percent precision, 389 to 537%). Predictive ability for concentrations obtained in the elimination phase was strikingly improved: mean percent bias, -17 to 70%; mean percent precision, 40 to 95%. Bayesian and least-squares estimated parameters were statistically better than fixed-parameter values for predicting concentrations in the elimination phase. These observations provide a modeling framework to determine pharmacokinetic disposition of zidovudine in an individual, screen for the existence of a drug interaction, and conduct concentration-controlled clinical trials.

The effect of cimetidine and ranitidine administration with zidovudine

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the possibility of a drug interaction with zidovudine and histamine2-receptor antagonists in individuals infected with the human immunodeficiency virus.

DESIGN

Randomized crossover study.

SETTING

University-affiliated research center.

PATIENTS

Six HIV-infected individuals.

INTERVENTIONS

The subjects received 7-day regimens of zidovudine 600 mg/day alone, zidovudine with cimetidine 1200 mg/day, and zidovudine with ranitidine 300 mg/day.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The renal clearance of zidovudine when given alone was 0.41 L/kg/hour, and was reduced to 0.18 L/kg/hour (p = 0.002) when given with cimetidine. In the presence of cimetidine the urinary excretion of zidovudine decreased from 89.5 to 53.7 microM (p = 0.01), the urinary ratio of metabolite to parent increased from 5.16 to 9.96 (p = 0.0001), and the fraction of zidovudine converted to metabolite increased from 0.86 to 0.92 (p = 0.0025).

CONCLUSION

Cimetidine presumably inhibits the renal clearance of zidovudine by competing for tubular secretion. Based on the observation that neither cimetidine nor ranitidine had a significant effect on serum concentrations of zidovudine or zidovudine glucuronide, a change in the dosage of zidovudine is not warranted.

Recent advances: antiinfectives

OBJECTIVE

To update readers on the significant changes in infectious diseases pharmacotherapy.

DATA SOURCES

An Index Medicus and Iowa Drug Information Service search (1993-1994) of English-language literature pertaining to the selected topic areas was performed. Additional information from abstracts presented at scientific meetings were identified by the authors.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

All identified studies were screened and those judged relevant to the update were evaluated.

DATA SYNTHESIS

New or clinically significant data since 1992 that related to peptic ulcer disease, microbial resistance (e.g., Enterococcus spp., Streptococcus pneumoniae, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Candida albicans), immunomodulators, and AIDS were evaluated and compared with previous data.

CONCLUSIONS

There have been several exciting and significant changes in infectious diseases pharmacotherapy evident from this review.

Gender differences in human pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics

Gender differences in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics have long been recognized in animals. In humans, however, little attention has been paid to this field despite at least theoretical reasons to believe that gender may be an important variable in the processes of absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion. Gastric acid secretion, gastrointestinal blood flow, proportions of muscular and adipose tissue, amount of drug binding proteins, gender-specific cytochrome P450 isozymes, physiologic and hormonal changes during the menstrual cycle, and renal blood flow are several factors that may contribute to sex-related differences in pharmacokinetics. Clinical investigations have documented greater absorption and subsequent incorporation of iron into erythrocytes, and higher bioavailability of ethanol in females. Women have been shown to have a slower metabolism of mephobarbital and propranolol but an increased biotransformation of methylprednisolone, all three of which are metabolized by enzymes of the cytochrome P450 system. Lastly, the renal excretion of amantadine was inhibited significantly by quinidine and quinine in men but not in women. While gender-specific pharmacodynamic data are meager, evidence also supports the existence of sex-related differences. Women appear to be more prone to develop torsades de points from drugs such as quinidine and procainamide than men. A dimorphism in insulin sensitivity has been demonstrated with males having an enhanced response compared to females. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic sex-related differences exist and are complex. Future research efforts should be designed to provide more gender-specific information on drug disposition and clinical effect.

Agents for treating human immunodeficiency virus infection

The replicative cycle of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) is reviewed, and currently used and investigational agents directed against the virus are discussed. The first step in the replication of HIV is selective binding of the envelope glycoprotein to CD4 receptors located on T lymphocytes. The virion is then uncoated within the cytoplasm, yielding viral genomic RNA. Reverse transcriptase uses the viral RNA as a template to form single-stranded DNA, which is duplicated to form proviral DNA through the activity of ribonuclease H. Host RNA polymerases transcribe the integrated proviral DNA into messenger RNA, and there is subsequent translation to viral proteins. After translation, further modification of precursor polyproteins is necessary to produce functional peptides. The assembled virus then buds from the cell surface and invades other cells. Targets of drug intervention in the replicative cycle include (1) binding and entry, (2) reverse transcriptase, (3) transcription and translation, and (4) viral maturation and budding. Inhibitors of binding and entry include recombinant soluble CD4, immunoadhesins, peptide T, and hypericin. Nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors include zidovudine, didanosine, zalcitabine, and stavudine. Foscarnet, tetrahydroimidazobenzo-diazepinthione compounds, and nevirapine are some nonnucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors. Inhibitors of transcription and translation include antagonists of the tat gene and GLQ223. Castanospermine, N-butyldeoxynojirimycin, and protease inhibitors interfere with viral maturation and budding. Drug combinations that have been or are being investigated include zidovudine plus interferon alfa, zidovudine plus zalcitabine, and zidovudine plus didanosine. Four agents currently have approved labeling for use against HIV infection: zidovudine, didanosine, zalcitabine, and stavudine. Monotherapy with zidovudine remains the treatment of first choice. Although progress has been made in developing drug therapies for HIV infection, more selective and more potent drugs are urgently needed. The best approach at present is to optimize the use of available agents, continue to investigate new therapies, and educate the public about prevention.

Effects of long-term drugs on alfentanil clearance in patients undergoing renal transplantation

Although patients in renal failure frequently take several drugs on a long-term basis, drug-induced alterations in alfentanil metabolism have not been examined as a possible source of variability in alfentanil clearance in this population. We compared the pharmacokinetics of alfentanil during renal transplantation in seven patients receiving and six not receiving long-term drug therapy. After the rapid intravenous injection of alfentanil 100 micrograms/kg during isoflurane anesthesia, plasma concentrations were measured at intervals up to 6 hours by radioimmunoassay. The terminal elimination half-life, steady-state volume of distribution (Vdss), and total body clearance were determined by noncompartmental methods. There was no statistical difference in the Vdss between the two patient groups. However, clearance was significantly higher and elimination half-life lower in the group taking long-term drugs: clearance 6.94 +/- 4.64 versus 3.47 +/- 0.16 ml.kg-1.min-1, and elimination half-life 50.6 +/- 13.9 versus 90.7 +/- 22.4 minutes, respectively (p < 0.05). The higher clearance occurred even though five of the seven patients were taking agents known to be metabolized by the same cytochrome P-450 hepatic isozyme that metabolizes alfentanil and therefore potential competitive inhibitors of alfentanil metabolism. Drugs taken by the three patients with the highest alfentanil clearances included known inducers of hepatic drug metabolism. Thus, in the presence of several long-term drugs, the clearance of alfentanil appears to be noticeably increased by inducers of hepatic drug metabolism but unaffected by potential competitive inhibitors.

Foscarnet for suppression of human immunodeficiency virus replication

The effect of foscarnet against human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) was evaluated in nine HIV-infected individuals; six completed 28 days of induction therapy. The overall mean increase in CD4+ lymphocytes was 64 cells per mm3. The mean decline in the HIV antigen concentration was 108 pg/ml (P = 0.03), and suppression was related to systemic foscarnet exposure by a maximum-effect pharmacodynamic model.

Current perspectives on antiretroviral therapy

Current estimates suggest that at least 1 million persons in the United States are infected with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), the cause of the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. Knowledge of the life cycle of HIV has provided the fundamental information necessary to initiate programs that will identify drugs to treat the infection. Inhibition of reverse transcriptase represents the only strategy of proved clinical value. Three such drugs are available: zidovudine, didanosine, and zalcitabine. Zidovudine is the only proved agent for therapy of asymptomatic HIV infection; and for symptomatic disease, monotherapy with zidovudine must also be regarded as the first-line approach. For patients who are intolerant, are failing clinically, or have received prior long-term treatment with zidovudine, monotherapy with didanosine or zalcitabine, or a combination of zidovudine and zalcitabine are alternatives. Progress is being made in the treatment of HIV infection, but the considerable challenge to affect the inexorable progressive nature of HIV disease remains daunting.

Treatment of herpesvirus infections in HIV-infected individuals

OBJECTIVE

To discuss strategies available for the treatment of herpesvirus infections in individuals infected with HIV.

DATA SOURCES

Information was obtained from controlled and uncontrolled clinical trials, abstracts, conference proceedings, and review articles.

STUDY SELECTION

Emphasis was placed on controlled investigations in subjects infected with HIV.

DATA EXTRACTION

Data from human studies were extracted by the author and evaluated according to the patient population studied, sample size, dosage regimen, and therapeutic response.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Herpes group viruses are common opportunistic pathogens in HIV-infected individuals. Zoster, caused by varicella-zoster virus (VZV), is an early indication of the loss of cell-mediated immunity and HIV disease progression. Anorectal mucocutaneous disease is the most common manifestation caused by herpes simplex virus (HSV). Acyclovir is the drug of choice for treatment of both VZV and HSV infections. Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is the most common life-threatening viral infection in patients with AIDS; retinitis is the most frequent clinical manifestation. The response rate of CMV retinitis to initial treatment with either ganciclovir or foscarnet is equivalent, approximately 60-90 percent. Recent data suggest that the survival benefit may be greater with foscarnet.

CONCLUSIONS

Advances in the development and application of antiviral drugs for herpes group viruses have made treatment and, in some cases, prevention of infections possible. Future efforts, aimed at earlier intervention and suppression of latent virus, may offer additional improvement in quality of life for the HIV-infected individual.