1
|
Dias-Karunaratne N, Whop L, Ward J, Vujovich-Dunn C, Amin J, Dakiniewich A, Dyda A. Representation of marginalised populations in digital surveillance for notifiable conditions in Australia: a systematic review. Perspect Public Health 2024; 144:162-173. [PMID: 38509693 PMCID: PMC11103913 DOI: 10.1177/17579139241237101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/22/2024]
Abstract
AIM This study aims to establish whether digital surveillance methods for notifiable diseases in Australia collect and report data in relation to marginalised populations. METHODS The literature was systematically reviewed to identify primary research studies published between January 2005 and July 2023. Studies were included if they described an Australian digital surveillance system for notifiable conditions. The results were synthesised with a focus on evaluating the collection and reporting of data in relation to marginalised populations. RESULTS A total of 13 articles reporting on seven surveillance systems were identified. Influenza and adverse events following immunisation were the two most common notifiable conditions monitored. A total of six surveillance systems encompassing 16 articles reported information on sub-populations. Of these, three surveillance systems (nine articles) included data on marginalised populations. CONCLUSION The data collected or reported in relation to sub-groups that characterise diversity in terms of health care needs, access, and marginalised populations are minimal. It is recommended that a set of equity and reporting principles is established for the future creation and use of any digital surveillance system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N Dias-Karunaratne
- School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - L Whop
- National Centre for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Wellbeing Research, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia
| | - J Ward
- Poche Centre for Indigenous Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - C Vujovich-Dunn
- The Kirby Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - J Amin
- Department of Health Science, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - A Dakiniewich
- School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - A Dyda
- School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, 288 Herston Road, Herston, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wand H, Vujovich-Dunn C, Moodley J, Reddy T, Naidoo S. Population-level impact of beliefs and attitudes on vaccine decision-making in South Africa: results from the COVID-19 Vaccine Survey (2021/2022). Public Health 2023; 216:58-65. [PMID: 36801593 PMCID: PMC9829597 DOI: 10.1016/j.puhe.2023.01.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2022] [Revised: 12/11/2022] [Accepted: 01/04/2023] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES In addition to being home to more than seven million HIV-infected individuals, South Africa also has a high burden of COVID-19 and related comorbidities worldwide. We aimed to identify the most influential "beliefs" and "attitudes" on vaccine decision-making behavior. STUDY DESIGN This study used panel data from cross-sectional surveys. METHODS We used the data from Black South Africans who participated in the "COVID-19 Vaccine Surveys" (November 2021 and February/March 2022) in South Africa. Besides standard risk factor analysis, such as multivariable logistic regression models, we also used the modified version of population attributable risk percent and estimated the population-level impacts of beliefs and attitudes on vaccine decision-making behavior using the methodology in multifactorial setting. RESULTS A total of 1399 people (57% men and 43% women) who participated in both surveys were analyzed. Of these, 336 (24%) reported being vaccinated in survey 2. Overall low perceived risk, concerns around efficacy, and safety were identified as the most influential factors and associated with 52%-72% (<40 years) and 34%-55% (40+ years) of the unvaccinated individuals. CONCLUSION Our findings highlighted the most influential beliefs and attitudes on vaccine decision-making and their population-level impacts, which are likely to have significant public health implications exclusively for this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H Wand
- Kirby Institute, University of New South Wales, Kensington, 2052, New South Wales, Australia. http://kirby.unsw.edu.au
| | - C Vujovich-Dunn
- Kirby Institute, University of New South Wales, Kensington, 2052, New South Wales, Australia.
| | - J Moodley
- The Aurum Institute, Johannesburg, South Africa.
| | - T Reddy
- Biostatistics Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Durban, Kwazulu-Natal, South Africa.
| | - S Naidoo
- Numolux Group, Pretoria, South Africa.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Vujovich-Dunn C, Wand H, Brotherton JML, Gidding H, Sisnowski J, Lorch R, Veitch M, Sheppeard V, Effler P, Skinner SR, Venn A, Davies C, Hocking J, Whop L, Leask J, Canfell K, Sanci L, Smith M, Kang M, Temple-Smith M, Kidd M, Burns S, Selvey L, Meijer D, Ennis S, Thomson C, Lane N, Kaldor J, Guy R. Measuring school level attributable risk to support school-based HPV vaccination programs. BMC Public Health 2022; 22:822. [PMID: 35468743 PMCID: PMC9036743 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-022-13088-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2021] [Accepted: 03/24/2022] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Background In Australia in 2017, 89% of 15-year-old females and 86% of 15-year-old males had received at least one dose of the HPV vaccine. However, considerable variation in HPV vaccination initiation (dose one) across schools remains. It is important to understand the school-level characteristics most strongly associated with low initiation and their contribution to the overall between-school variation. Methods A population-based ecological analysis was conducted using school-level data for 2016 on all adolescent students eligible for HPV vaccination in three Australian jurisdictions. We conducted logistic regression to determine school-level factors associated with lower HPV vaccination initiation (< 75% dose 1 uptake) and estimated the population attributable risk (PAR) and the proportion of schools with the factor (school-level prevalence). Results The factors most strongly associated with lower initiation, and their prevalence were; small schools (OR = 9.3, 95%CI = 6.1–14.1; 33% of schools), special education schools (OR = 5.6,95%CI = 3.7–8.5; 8% of schools), higher Indigenous enrolments (OR = 2.7,95% CI:1.9–3.7; 31% of schools), lower attendance rates (OR = 2.6,95%CI = 1.7–3.7; 35% of schools), remote location (OR = 2.6,95%CI = 1.6–4.3; 6% of schools,) and lower socioeconomic area (OR = 1.8,95% CI = 1.3–2.5; 33% of schools). The highest PARs were small schools (PAR = 79%, 95%CI:76–82), higher Indigenous enrolments (PAR = 38%, 95%CI: 31–44) and lower attendance rate (PAR = 37%, 95%CI: 29–46). Conclusion This analysis suggests that initiatives to support schools that are smaller, with a higher proportion of Indigenous adolescents and lower attendance rates may contribute most to reducing the variation of HPV vaccination uptake observed at a school-level in these jurisdictions. Estimating population-level coverage at the school-level is useful to guide policy and prioritise resourcing to support school-based vaccination programs. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-022-13088-x.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Vujovich-Dunn
- University of New South Wales, Kirby Institute, Kensington, Australia.
| | - H Wand
- University of New South Wales, Kirby Institute, Kensington, Australia
| | - J M L Brotherton
- Australian Centre for the Prevention of Cervical Cancer, Population Health, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,University of Melbourne, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, Carlton, VIC, Australia
| | - H Gidding
- University of Sydney, Northern Clinical School, Sydney, Australia.,Women and Babies Research, Kolling Institute, Northern Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, Australia.,School of Population Health, University of New South Wales, Kensington, Australia.,National Centre for Immunisation Research and Surveillance, Sydney, Australia
| | - J Sisnowski
- University of New South Wales, Kirby Institute, Kensington, Australia.,Australian National University, National Centre for Epidemiology & Population Health, Canberra, Australia
| | - R Lorch
- University of New South Wales, Kirby Institute, Kensington, Australia
| | - M Veitch
- Department of Health and Human Services, Tasmanian Government, Hobart, Australia
| | - V Sheppeard
- Communicable Diseases Branch, NSW Health, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia.,University of Sydney, Sydney School of Public Health, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
| | - P Effler
- Communicable Disease Control Directorate, Department of Health, Western Australia, East Perth, Australia
| | - S R Skinner
- University of Sydney, Specialty of Child and Adolescent Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney, Australia.,Children's Hospital Westmead, Sydney Children's Hospitals Network, Westmead, Australia
| | - A Venn
- Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Tasmanian, Australia
| | - C Davies
- University of Sydney, Specialty of Child and Adolescent Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney, Australia.,Children's Hospital Westmead, Sydney Children's Hospitals Network, Westmead, Australia
| | - J Hocking
- University of Melbourne, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, Carlton, VIC, Australia
| | - L Whop
- Australian National University, National Centre for Epidemiology & Population Health, Canberra, Australia.,Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Cairns, QLD, Australia
| | - J Leask
- National Centre for Immunisation Research and Surveillance, Sydney, Australia.,University of Sydney, Sydney Nursing School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
| | - K Canfell
- The Daffodil Centre, University of Sydney, A Joint Venture With Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, Australia
| | - L Sanci
- University of Melbourne, Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, Carlton, VIC, Australia
| | - M Smith
- The Daffodil Centre, University of Sydney, A Joint Venture With Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, Australia.,School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - M Kang
- University of Sydney, Westmead Clinical School, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - M Temple-Smith
- University of Melbourne, Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, Carlton, VIC, Australia
| | - M Kidd
- Flinders University, Southgate Institute for Health, Society and Equity, Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia
| | - S Burns
- Curtin University, School of Population Health, Bentley, WA, Australia
| | - L Selvey
- University of Queensland, School of Public Health, St Lucia, QLD, Australia
| | - D Meijer
- Immunisation Unit, Health Protection NSW, St Leonard's, New South Wales, Australia
| | - S Ennis
- Immunisation Unit, Health Protection NSW, St Leonard's, New South Wales, Australia
| | - C Thomson
- Communicable Disease Control Directorate, Department of Health, Western Australia, East Perth, Australia
| | - N Lane
- Department of Health and Human Services, Tasmanian Government, Hobart, Australia
| | - J Kaldor
- University of New South Wales, Kirby Institute, Kensington, Australia
| | - R Guy
- University of New South Wales, Kirby Institute, Kensington, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Sisnowski J, Vujovich-Dunn C, Gidding H, Brotherton J, Wand H, Lorch R, Veitch M, Sheppeard V, Effler P, Skinner SR, Venn A, Davies C, Hocking J, Whop L, Leask J, Canfell K, Sanci L, Smith M, Kang M, Temple-Smith M, Kidd M, Burns S, Selvey L, Meijer D, Ennis S, Thomson C, Lane N, Kaldor J, Guy R. Differences in school factors associated with adolescent HPV vaccination initiation and completion coverage in three Australian states. Vaccine 2021; 39:6117-6126. [PMID: 34493408 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.08.076] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2021] [Revised: 08/19/2021] [Accepted: 08/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Schools are the primary setting for the delivery of adolescent HPV vaccination in Australia. Although this strategy has achieved generally high vaccination coverage, gaps persist for reasons that are mostly unknown. This study sought to identify school-level correlates of low vaccination course initiation and completion in New South Wales, Tasmania, and Western Australia to inform initiatives to increase uptake. METHODS Initiation was defined as the number of first doses given in a school in 2016 divided by vaccine-eligible student enrolments. Completion was the number of third doses given in a school in 2015-2016 divided by the number of first doses. Low initiation and completion were defined as coverage ≤ 25thpercentile of all reporting schools. We investigated correlations between covariates using Spearman's rank correlation coefficients. Due to multicollinearity, we used univariable logistic regression to investigate associations between school characteristics and low coverage. RESULTS Median initiation was 84.7% (IQR: 75.0%-90.4%) across 1,286 schools and median completion was 93.8% (IQR: 86.0%-97.3%) across 1,295 schools. There were strong correlations between a number of school characteristics, particularly higher Indigenous student enrolments and lower attendance, increasing remoteness, higher postcode socioeconomic disadvantage, and smaller school size. Characteristics most strongly associated with low initiation in univariate analyses were small school size, location in Tasmania, and schools catering for special educational needs. Low completion was most strongly associated with schools in Tasmania and Western Australia, remote location, small size, high proportion of Indigenous student enrolments, and low attendance rates. CONCLUSION This study provides indicative evidence that characteristics of schools and school populations are associated with the likelihood of low initiation and completion of the HPV vaccination course. The findings will guide further research and help target initiatives to improve vaccination uptake in schools with profiles associated with lower coverage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Sisnowski
- The Kirby Institute, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Wallace Wurth Building, High St., Kensington, New South Wales, Australia; Australian National University, National Centre for Epidemiology & Population Health, Canberra, Australia.
| | - C Vujovich-Dunn
- The Kirby Institute, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Wallace Wurth Building, High St., Kensington, New South Wales, Australia.
| | - H Gidding
- University of New South Wales, School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Kensington, Australia; National Centre for Immunisation Research and Surveillance, Westmead, Australia; The University of Sydney Northern Clinical School, St Leonards, Australia.
| | - J Brotherton
- Population Health, VCS Foundation, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; University of Melbourne, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, Carlton, Victoria, Australia.
| | - H Wand
- The Kirby Institute, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Wallace Wurth Building, High St., Kensington, New South Wales, Australia.
| | - R Lorch
- The Kirby Institute, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Wallace Wurth Building, High St., Kensington, New South Wales, Australia.
| | - M Veitch
- Tasmanian Government, Department of Health and Human Services, Hobart, Australia.
| | - V Sheppeard
- Communicable Diseases Branch, Health Protection NSW, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia; University of Sydney, Sydney School of Public Health, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.
| | - P Effler
- Communicable Disease Control Directorate, Department of Health, Western Australia, East Perth, Australia.
| | - S R Skinner
- Children's Hospital Westmead, Sydney Children's Hospitals Network, Westmead, Australia; University of Sydney, Specialty of Child and Adolescent Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.
| | - A Venn
- Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Tasmanian, Australia.
| | - C Davies
- Children's Hospital Westmead, Sydney Children's Hospitals Network, Westmead, Australia; University of Sydney, Specialty of Child and Adolescent Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.
| | - J Hocking
- University of Melbourne, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, Carlton, Victoria, Australia.
| | - L Whop
- Australian National University, National Centre for Epidemiology & Population Health, Canberra, Australia; Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Cairns, Queensland, Australia.
| | - J Leask
- National Centre for Immunisation Research and Surveillance, Westmead, Australia; University of Sydney, Sydney Nursing School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.
| | - K Canfell
- Cancer Research Division, Cancer Council, New South Wales, Australia.
| | - L Sanci
- University of Melbourne, Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, Carlton, Victoria, Australia.
| | - M Smith
- Communicable Disease Control Directorate, Department of Health, Western Australia, East Perth, Australia; Cancer Research Division, Cancer Council, New South Wales, Australia.
| | - M Kang
- University of Sydney, Westmead Clinical School, New South Wales, Australia.
| | - M Temple-Smith
- University of Melbourne, Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, Carlton, Victoria, Australia.
| | - M Kidd
- Flinders University, Southgate Institute for Health, Society and Equity, South Australia, Australia.
| | - S Burns
- Curtin University, School of Population Health, Western Australia, Australia.
| | - L Selvey
- University of Queensland, School of Public Health, Queensland, Australia.
| | - D Meijer
- Immunisation Unit, Health Protection NSW, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia.
| | - S Ennis
- Immunisation Unit, Health Protection NSW, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia.
| | - C Thomson
- Communicable Disease Control Directorate, Department of Health, Western Australia, East Perth, Australia.
| | - N Lane
- Tasmanian Government, Department of Health and Human Services, Hobart, Australia.
| | - J Kaldor
- The Kirby Institute, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Wallace Wurth Building, High St., Kensington, New South Wales, Australia.
| | - R Guy
- The Kirby Institute, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Wallace Wurth Building, High St., Kensington, New South Wales, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|