Effects of sleep disturbances and circadian rhythms modifications on cognition in breast cancer women before and after adjuvant chemotherapy: the ICANSLEEP-1 protocol

BACKGROUND

Many patients treated for breast cancer (BC) complain about cognitive difficulties affecting their daily lives. Recently, sleep disturbances and circadian rhythm disruptions have been brought to the fore as potential contributors to cognitive difficulties in patients with BC. Yet, studies on these factors as well as their neural correlates are scarce. The purpose of the ICANSLEEP-1 (Impact of SLEEP disturbances in CANcer) study is to characterize sleep using polysomnography and its relationship with the evolution of cognitive functioning at both the behavioral and the neuroanatomical levels across treatment in BC patients treated or not with adjuvant chemotherapy.

METHODS

ICANSLEEP-1 is a longitudinal study including BC patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy (n = 25) or not treated with adjuvant chemotherapy (n = 25) and healthy controls with no history of BC (n = 25) matched for age (45-65 years old) and education level. The evaluations will take place within 6 weeks after inclusion, before the initiation of chemotherapy (for BC patients who are candidates for chemotherapy) or before the first fraction of radiotherapy (for BC patients with no indication for chemotherapy) and 6 months later (corresponding to 2 weeks after the end of chemotherapy). Episodic memory, executive functions, psychological factors, and quality of life will be assessed with validated neuropsychological tests and self-questionnaires. Sleep quantity and quality will be assessed with polysomnography and circadian rhythms with both actigraphy and saliva cortisol. Grey and white matter volumes, as well as white matter microstructural integrity, will be compared across time between patients and controls and will serve to further investigate the relationship between sleep disturbances and cognitive decline.

DISCUSSION

Our results will help patients and clinicians to better understand sleep disturbances in BC and their relationship with cognitive functioning across treatment. This will aid the identification of more appropriate sleep therapeutic approaches adapted to BC patients. Improving sleep in BC would eventually help limit cognitive deficits and thus improve quality of life during and after treatments.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT05414357, registered June 10, 2022.

PROTOCOL VERSION

Version 1.2 dated March 23, 2022.

Sleep-dependent memory consolidation in breast cancer: Use of a virtual reality prospective memory task

Background

Previous studies have revealed both sleep alterations and prospective memory (PM) impairments in breast cancer (BC) patients. PM refers to memory of intended actions and is crucial for daily living tasks and treatment compliance. As sleep is known to favor memory consolidation, one may expect that changes in sleep quality related to BC would have an impact on PM performance. This study aimed at assessing sleep-dependent consolidation of intentions using an ecological, virtual reality-based PM task in BC patients not treated with chemotherapy.

Materials and methods

Thirty-seven early stages BC patients and 21 healthy controls (HC) participated in this study. PM was assessed using a virtual reality task, during which participants learnt a list of intentions and recalled them after a retention interval filled with a day awake or a night of sleep monitored by polysomnography. Sleep spindles and slow waves, brain oscillations involved in sleep-dependent memory consolidation, were quantified automatically using the Aseega software (Physip). Subjective sleep disturbances and markers of quality of life (psychological distress, fatigue, and well-being) were assessed by questionnaires.

Results

Greater PM performance was observed after sleep than after an equivalent period of daytime wakefulness for both groups (HC and BC). PM performance after sleep did not differ significantly between groups. Yet, BC patients reported greater sleep disturbances than HC which were related with poorer intentions retrieval, greater psychological distress, fatigue and poorer well-being. The frequency of spindles was higher and the amplitude of slow waves lower in BC patients compared to HC. However, no significant association was observed between polysomnography parameters and PM scores in the whole sample of participants.

Conclusion

Although subtle changes in brain oscillations involved in sleep-dependent memory consolidation were observed, these changes did not significantly impair overnight PM consolidation in BC patients. Nevertheless, poorer PM performance was associated with greater sleep complaints which in turn were related to poorer quality of life. Overall, these data suggest that sleep-dependent PM consolidation mechanisms are not altered in early stages BC patients not treated with chemotherapy. Further investigations are needed to understand the association between markers of quality of life and sleep-dependent memory consolidation.

A phase III randomized trial of weight loss to reduce cancer-related fatigue among overweight and obese breast cancer patients: MEDEA Study design

Background

Elevated body mass index (BMI) represents a risk factor for cancer-related fatigue (CRF). Weight loss interventions are feasible and safe in cancer survivors, leading to improved cardio-metabolic and quality of life (QOL) outcomes and modulating inflammatory biomarkers. Randomized data are lacking showing that a lifestyle intervention aimed at weight loss, combining improved diet, exercise, and motivational counseling, reduces CRF. Motivating to Exercise and Diet, and Educating to healthy behaviors After breast cancer (MEDEA) is a multi-center, randomized controlled trial evaluating the impact of weight loss on CRF in overweight or obese survivors of breast cancer. Herein, we described the MEDEA methodology.

Methods

Patients (N = 220) with stage I–III breast cancer and BMI ≥ 25 kg/m², within 12 months of primary treatment, and able to walk ≥ 400 m are eligible to enroll. Participants are randomized 1:1 to health education alone vs. a personalized telephone-based weight loss intervention plus health education. Both arms receive a health education program focusing on healthy living. Patients in the intervention arm are paired with an individual lifestyle coach, who delivers the intervention through 24 semi-structured telephone calls over 1 year. Intervention goals include weight loss ≥ 10% of baseline, caloric restriction of 500–1000 Kcal/day, and increased physical activity (PA) to 150 (initial phase) and 225–300 min/week (maintenance phase). The intervention is based on the social cognitive theory and is adapted from the Breast Cancer Weight Loss trial (BWEL, A011401). The primary endpoint is the difference in self-reported CRF (EORTC QLQ-C30) between arms. Secondary endpoints include the following: QOL (EORTC QLQ-C30, -BR45, -FA12), anxiety, and depression (HADS); weight and BMI, dietary habits and quality, PA, and sleep; health care costs (hospital-admissions, all-drug consumption, sick leaves) and cost-effectiveness (cost per quality-adjusted life-year); and patient motivation and satisfaction. The primary analysis of MEDEA will compare self-reported CRF at 12 months post-randomization between arms, with 80.0% power (two-sided α = 0.05) to detect a standardized effect size of 0.40.

Discussion

MEDEA will test the impact of a weight loss intervention on CRF among overweight or obese BC survivors, potentially providing additional management strategies and contributing to establish weight loss support as a new standard of clinical care.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.govNCT04304924

Adjustment of young women with breast cancer after chemotherapy: A mediation model of emotional competence via emotional distress

OBJECTIVE

Emotional competence (EC) is considered a substantial resource in the adjustment of cancer patients, especially via its effect on anxiety and depression symptoms. This research aimed at assessing the impact of intrapersonal EC in young women (≤45 years) with breast cancer (YWBC) on their specific quality of life (i.e. subjective experience related to daily difficulties and perceived repercussions of the disease and treatments) related to chemotherapy, via anxiety and depression symptoms.

METHODS

Two hundred fifty YWBC from 24 French centers completed a self-reported questionnaire after diagnosis (T1) and after the chemotherapy phase (T2), comprising the Young Women Breast Cancer Inventory, the Profile of EC and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. The indirect effect of EC (T1) on subjective experience (T2) via anxiety and depression symptoms (T2) was tested using regressions and the Macro PROCESS.

RESULTS

Emotional competence predicted fewer anxiety and depression symptoms at T1 and T2, and a better subjective experience at T2 via fewer anxiety and depression symptoms. Depression symptoms appeared to be a stronger mediator than anxiety symptoms on four dimensions (Support from close relatives, feeling of couple cohesion, body image and sexuality, management of children and everyday life), whereas anxiety symptoms appeared to be a stronger mediator on two dimensions (negative affectivity and apprehension about the future, deterioration of relationships).

CONCLUSIONS

These results support the importance of developing psycho-affective interventions to reinforce the EC of YWBC during chemotherapy in order to facilitate the cognitive and emotional processes necessary for a better adjustment and subjective experience.

Abstract OT-38-01: MEDEA: A randomized trial of weight loss to reduce cancer-related fatigue (CRF) among overweight and obese breast cancer (BC) patients

Rationale: Overweight and obesity are highly prevalent among BC patients and are linked to poorer prognosis and worse patient-reported outcomes (PROs). Weight loss interventions, based on caloric restriction, increased physical activity (PA) and behavioral counselling, are safe and feasible among BC survivors and hold the promise to improve BC-specific outcomes. MEDEA: Motivating to Exercise and Diet, and Educating to healthy behaviors After breast cancer (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04304924) will evaluate the impact of weight loss on CRF.

Trial design: French multi-center 1:1 randomized controlled trial comparing a 12-month personalized, telephone-based weight loss program + health education intervention vs health education alone in overweight or obese BC patients.

Endpoints and measures: Primary endpoint: difference in self-reported CRF 12 months post-randomization between arms, measured using the EORTC QLQ-C30 CRF subscale. Secondary endpoints: 1) PROs (EORTC QLQ-C30, -B45, -FA12), anxiety and depression (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale); 2) weight and body mass index (BMI), diet habits and quality, PA, sleep; 3) cost-effectiveness (number and length of hospital-admissions, all-drug consumption, number and duration of sick leaves). Accelerometer data will be collected to track PA and sleep measures. Qualitative analyses will evaluate patient motivation and satisfaction.

Main eligibility criteria: stage I-II-III BC, primary BC treatment completed within the prior 12 months (definitive surgery, adjuvant chemo-, and/or radio-therapy, if administered), BMI ≥25 kg/m2, ability to walk at least 400 meters at any pace, ECOG PS 0-1, not participating in another weight loss, dietary or PA intervention clinical trial.

Intervention and Control arms: The intervention and health education program are adapted from the BWEL: Breast Cancer WEight Loss study (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02750826; PI Ligibel JA). The behavior change program is based on the Social Cognitive Theory. Patients in the intervention arm are paired with an individual lifestyle coach, who delivers the intervention through 24 semi-structured telephone calls of 30-60 minutes, supplemented by a detailed participant workbook and scheduled as follows: 1) intensive phase (weeks 1-12), 12 weekly calls; 2) consolidation phase (weeks 13-24), 6 bi-weekly calls; 3) maintenance phase (weeks 25-52), 1 monthly call. Coaches were hired and trained specifically for MEDEA, they are located at a centralized call center and receive support from coordinating nutrition, PA, and behavioral experts. Regular meetings with study team and investigators assure standardized delivery of the intervention and troubleshooting. Intervention goals include weight loss ≥10% of baseline weight, caloric restriction of 500-1000 Kcal/day, increased PA to 150 minutes/week in the initial phase and 225-300 minutes/week in the maintenance phase. Toolbox solutions are offered to tailor the intervention and meet the needs of specific ethnic, socioeconomic or other patient populations with difficulties in achieving intervention goals. All participants in both arms receive a health education program focusing on healthy living.

Accrual: MEDEA will enroll 220 patients overall. Recruitment started in June 2020.

Statistical considerations: The primary analysis of MEDEA will compare the primary endpoint of CRF scores at the 12-month post-randomization time point between arms. The study has 90.0% power at two-sided α=0.05 to detect a standardized effect size of 0.40 (sample size inflated for drop outs). For interpreting the clinical significance of effects, 0.2, 0.5 and 0.8 standard deviation effects will be considered as small, moderate, and large (Cohen, 1988). All other measures, time points and analyses will be considered secondary or exploratory.

Citation Format: Antonio Di Meglio, Elise Martin, Stefan Michiels, Cecile Charles, Tracy E. Crane, Aude Barbier, Bruno Raynard, Anthony Mangin, Olivier Tredan, Paul H. Cottu, Laurence Vanlemmens, Carine Segura-Djezzar, Anne Lesur, Barbara Pistilli, Florence Joly, Thomas Ginsbourger, Bernadette Coquet, Guillemette Jacob, Aude Sirven, Julia Bonastre, Jennifer A. Ligibel, Ines Vaz-Luis. MEDEA: A randomized trial of weight loss to reduce cancer-related fatigue (CRF) among overweight and obese breast cancer (BC) patients [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT-38-01.