Information requested about organ donation in primary health care centers

Information provided by primary care workers about organ donation significantly affects the attitude of the general public. The objective of this study was to evaluate information about donation requested by the general public in health centers in an autonomous community (region) of Spain and to find out how many workers provided relevant information.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A random sample was taken and stratified by sex, job category, and geographical location (six health areas of our autonomous regional community, 45 municipal councils), among primary care health workers in order to obtain a total of 428 respondents in 34 primary care centers. A study was undertaken of information requested and provided about organ donation and transplantation. The chi square test was applied and differences were considered significant at levels of P < .05.

RESULTS

Forty-three percent (n=185) of the workers surveyed indicated that information had been requested from them about organ donation and transplantation. This request for information was much greater from physicians than from the other types of workers (P = .015). Furthermore, 54% of primary care health workers (n=229) reported having provided information about donation, especially physicians (64%), with this being mainly favorable. Information had also been provided by nurses (59%) and ancillary staff (34%).

CONCLUSION

Information requested from primary care health workers by the general public about organ donation and transplantation is increasing when we compare it to data from previous years. Around half of primary care workers have offered information about transplantation. Therefore, it is fundamental that these workers have adequate and correct information to provide patients and families.

Attitude of kidney patients on the transplant waiting list toward related-living donation. A reason for the scarce development of living donation in Spain

INTRODUCTION

Most Spanish transplant centers have on-going living kidney transplant programs. However, such transplants are not increasing as a proportion of the total number of kidney transplants. The objective of this study is to analyze the attitude of kidney patients on the kidney transplant waiting list toward living kidney donation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The patients studied were selected from those included on the kidney transplant waiting list from November 2003 until September 2005 (n = 221). Attitude toward living donation was evaluated using a psychosocial questionnaire. It was completed in a direct personal interview with an independent health-care worker from the Transplant Unit. Student's t-test and the chi-squared test were applied.

RESULTS

Two hundred and fourteen patients completed the questionnaire (97%), of which 35% would accept a related living kidney if it were offered to them, 60% would prefer to wait on the waiting list and the remaining 5% are undecided. Up to 66% (n = 134) of patients report that a member of their family or a friend have offered them an organ for donation. Eighty-nine percentage believe that there is some risk involved in living kidney donation, although it is not a factor that affects whether an organ would be accepted or not (p = 0.767). The psychosocial variables that affect attitude toward accepting a related living kidney are: (i) age: the youngest are those who are most likely to accept (40 vs. 45-yr-old; p = 0.010); (ii) descendents: patients without descendents are more likely to accept a living organ (56% vs. 27%; p < 0.000); (iii) marital status: a greater percentage of single respondents would be prepared to receive this type of transplant compared to the group of married respondents (55% vs. 30%. p = 0.007); and (iv) level of education: those with a higher level of education are more likely to accept a living organ (43% have secondary or university studies vs. 28% who only have primary education; p = 0.040).

CONCLUSION

Patients on the waiting list for a kidney transplant do not have a very favorable attitude toward receiving a related-living donor organ, although members of their family have offered them one of their organs. The profile of a patient who would accept a related-living donated kidney is a young, single person, without descendents, and with a high level of education.

Hemodynamic Assessment During Auxiliary Heterotopic Liver Transplantation With Portal Vein Arterialization in a Swine Model: Preliminary Report of 10 Transplants

Portal vein arterialization (PVA) is a technical variation of auxiliary heterotopic liver transplantation (AHLT) that is rarely studied but that simplifies the AHLT surgical technique because it does not act on the portal area. The objective of this study was to analyze the hemodynamic consequences of this auxiliary transplant in an experimental model.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ten AHLT-PVA were analyzed in a pig model. A PiCCO (Pulsion) monitor was used for the hemodynamic study of the recipient. The following were measured: cardiac index, (CI), systemic vascular resistance index, (SVRI), mean arterial pressure (MAP), global end-diastolic volume, central venous pressure, and intrathoracic blood volume. The measurements were taken at four times during transplant: at baseline, after inferior vena cava clamping, after graft reperfusion, and at closure.

RESULTS

After graft reperfusion there was a reduction in SVRI (968 +/- 168.03 vs 1686.25 +/- 290.66; P < .05) and in MAP, and there was an increase in CI. At the end of the transplant MAP and SVRI recovered (1254.2 +/- 225.79 vs 968 +/- 168.03; P < .05) but CI remained slightly high. The end-diastolic volume showed greater variation than central venous pressure, although this was only statistically significant at the inferior vena cava clamping phase (244.75 +/- 52.05 vs 333.37 +/- 170.13; P < .05).

DISCUSSION

Heterotopic liver transplantation with portal arterialization is well-tolerated hemodynamically. Graft reperfusion decreases SVRI and increases CI to compensate for this. This behavior, which in healthy recipients like ours is not a problem, could imply a contraindication in patients with a prior hyperdynamic state.

Hospital personnel faced with organ xenotransplantation: an attitudinal survey in a hospital with a pre-clinical liver xenotransplantation program

BACKGROUND

In situations of extreme urgency when there is a need for vital organs, xenotransplantation could provide a bridge until the arrival of a human organ. However, it is important to find out the level of acceptance of this potential therapy among the health care workers who would be involved in its implementation. The objective of this study is to analyze attitude among personnel in a hospital with a pre-clinical xenotransplantation program toward xenotransplantation and to determine the variables that influence this attitude.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A random sample (n=1168) was taken and stratified according to job category and service. Attitude toward xenotransplantation was evaluated using a validated questionnaire. Contact was made with the head of each service who was given an explanation of the project. This person was made responsible for the distribution and collection of the survey in each service in randomly selected work shifts. Such a survey was completed anonymously and was self-administered. A random sample of 250 individuals from our regional community was used as a control group.

RESULTS

The survey completion rate was 98% (n=1148). Most respondents are in favor (67%), 7% are against and 26% undecided. Such an attitude is more favorable in the control group (74% vs. 67%; P=0.0378). The following factors are positively related to such an attitude: (1) male sex (P<0.0005); (2) a younger age (P=0.013); (3) participation in prosocial voluntary activities (P=0.002); (4) knowing that the church has a positive attitude toward donation and transplantation (P<0.0005); (5) a partner's favorable attitude toward transplantation (P<0.0005); (6) a physician's job category (P<0.0005); (7) a resident physician's job contract situation (P=0.017); (8) a respondent's belief that he or she may need a transplant in the future (P<0.0005); and (9) a favorable attitude toward human donation, whether this be cadaveric or living (P<0.0005). In the multivariate analysis, the following persist as independent variables: (1) sex (odds ratio=1.6); (2) participation in prosocial voluntary activities (odds ratio=2.2); (3) a partner's unfavorable attitude toward transplantation (odds ratio=0.3); (4) a favorable attitude toward cadaveric donation (odds ratio=2); and (5) attitude toward living liver donation (odds ratio=3.8).

CONCLUSIONS

Attitude toward xenotransplantation is not as favorable among hospital personnel as it is in the general public and this is determined by many factors. It will be necessary for research groups to periodically carry out awareness-raising activities about our findings in our own centers, to avoid the rejection that could be generated by a lack of awareness.

What Is the Attitude of Hospital Transplant-related Personnel Toward Donation?

The attitude of health-care workers, especially in transplant-related services, is fundamental in the process of organ procurement. In this study we examine the attitude of workers in transplant-related services toward cadaveric organ donation and transplantation (ODT) in a third-level hospital in Spain. A random sample was stratified according to type of service and job category (n = 309) among personnel in transplant-related services (organ procurement units, transplant units and follow-up units). Attitude toward cadaveric organ donation was evaluated using a validated psychosocial questionnaire. Seventy percent (n = 215) of respondents were found to be in favor of donation, as opposed to 30% against or undecided (n = 94). Regarding job category, attitude was most favorable among physicians (86%, n = 99; p = 0.000). With respect to type of service, attitude tended to be more negative in organ procurement units and more positive in the follow-up units of transplanted patients (41% vs 81%, p = 0.013). Upon analysis of the psychosocial variables, significant results were found with respect to the following factors: (1) age (39 vs 42 years, p = 0.007); (2) having discussed ODT with family members or with a partner (p = 0.007); (3) understanding of the concept of brain death (p = 0.001); (4) attitude toward carrying out an autopsy (p = 0.001); and (5) concern about the possibility of mutilation after organ extraction. Attitude toward cadaveric donation was lower than expected among personnel in transplant-related services, especially among ancillary personnel and workers in organ procurement units.

Doppler ultrasonographic and scintigraphic assessment of an auxiliary heterotopic liver transplantation with portal vein arterialization in pigs

OBJECTIVE

Our aim was to evaluate liver graft integrity and function using scintigraphy and ultrasonography in a porcine model of auxiliary heterotopic liver transplantation with portal vein arterialization (AHLT-PVA).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Using Doppler ultrasonography we evaluated eight AHLT-PVA by parenchymal echogenicity, portal and arterial anatomy, and portal and biliary system flow. Two types of scintigraphy were performed: microaggregated human albumin colloid scintigraphy and diisopropyl iminodiacetic acid (DISIDA) scintigraphy, both labeled with 99mTc.

RESULTS

The animals were distributed into two groups. The first group consisted of three animals with clinical suspicion of graft dysfunction, in which the ultrasonographic study revealed areas of parenchymal destructuring. In the scintigraphic study, heterogenous uptake was observed; there was no uptake in one animal. Necropsy of these three animals revealed areas of graft necrosis. The second group consisted of five animals with good clinical evolutions, in which the ultrasonographic study showed portal dilation, portal flow with arterial spiculations, and homogenous echogenicity of the hepatic parenchyma. The scintigraphic study revealed homogenous uptake by the graft and an elimination speed of the hepatobiliary agent similar to that of the native liver.

CONCLUSIONS

An heterogenous echostructure of the graft provided a sign of poor prognosis indicating necrosis in the same way as heterogenous uptake or nonuptake of radioisotope upon scintigraphy. Scintigraphy is a good method to evaluate biliary function and bile elimination. In an AHLT-PVA, the main ultrasound findings derived from arterialization were dilation of the portal system and portal flow with arterial spiculations.

Attitudes of Primary Care Professionals in Spain Toward Xenotransplantation

OBJECTIVE

The deficit in transplantable organs is making it necessary to find alternative sources. One possibility is xenotransplantation. However, the use of animal organs may be rejected by society and among health professionals. Primary Care is fundamental for promoting matters of health; in Spain it has access to nearly 100% of the population. Our objective was to analyze the acceptance of this therapy, although it is experimental, among Primary Care professionals, given that they are the ones most involved in spreading information about this therapy if it was confirmed to be useful.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A random sample was stratified by sex, job category, and geographical location among Primary Care personnel, including 428 professionals in 32 health centers among population of 2851 professionals. Attitudes toward xenotransplantation were evaluated using a questionnaire on psychosocial attitudes validated in our geographical area. Contact was made in each center with the Doctor Coordinator for doctors, the Nursing Coordinator for nurses, and an Administrative Officer for ancillary personnel. The chi-square test and Student t test were applied to evaluate categorical and continuous data, respectively.

RESULTS

Attitudes toward xenotransplantation were similar to those obtained in human organs: favorable in 79% (n = 325), whereas 19% (n = 78) had doubts and 2% (n = 10) were against. The attitude was more favorable in men (89% vs 72%; P < .000), those who had cared for transplant patients (84% vs 71%; P = .009), those with previous experience in organ donation and transplantation (84% vs 75%; P = .033), those with an attitude in favor of cadaveric organ donation (83% vs 66%; P < .0001), and those in favor of living donation of the kidney (P < .000) or the liver (P < .000), as well as those who believed that they may need a transplant at some time in the future (84% vs 74%; P = .045). There was a clear difference in attitude according to job category (P = .018): approval rates were 89% for doctors, 76% for nurses, and 70% for ancillary personnel.

CONCLUSIONS

Attitudes toward future application of xenotransplantation were quite positive among doctors. However, the attitudes of nursing and ancillary personnel were similar to those of the general population. The main factors related to such an attitude depended mainly on the previous relationship and attitude of the respondent toward human organ donation and transplantation.

Primary Care Doctors Faced With Living Organ Donation

OBJECTIVE

The attitudes of health care personnel, specifically doctors, have a significant influence on public attitudes toward organ donation and transplantation. The objective herein was to analyze the attitudes of Primary Care (PC) doctors toward living organ donation and to determine the psychosocial factors that condition these attitudes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A random sample was stratified by geographical location (six health areas in our community) among PC doctors, including 155 respondents from 32 health centers. Attitudes toward donation were evaluated using a psychosocial questionnaire validated in our geographical area. Contact was made with the Doctor Coordinator in each center for distribution of the questionnaires, which were completed anonymously. The chi-square test and Student t test were applied to evaluate the data.

RESULTS

When the living donor is not related, only 21% (n = 32) of PC doctors were in favor of living kidney donation, and only 20% (n = 31) for living liver donation (P > .05). In contrast, these percentages were 90% and 89% in favor of kidney and liver related donation, respectively. Upon analysis of the psychosocial variables affecting these attitudes, there was only an association with their partner's opinion (P = .009 for kidney and P = .000 for liver), and the possibility of needing a transplant oneself (P = .000).

CONCLUSIONS

PC doctors have favorable attitudes toward related living donation. If living donation is promoted by transplant coordination units, such PC professionals could act as a source of positive information about the matter for the general public.

Ancillary Hospital Personnel Faced With Organ Donation and Transplantation

OBJECTIVE

To reduce the number of family organ donation refusals, it is necessary not only to act on the general public but also on the health care system. In this respect, there are data suggesting that the percentage of hospital personnel against donation is high, especially among ancillary personnel. The objective herein was to analyze the attitudes of ancillary hospital professionals toward donation of their own organs and determine factors that conditioned such attitudes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A random sample in a third-level hospital with a solid organ transplant program was stratified by ancillary services: administrative, porters, maintenance, cleaning, and cooking. Attitudes toward donation of one's own organs after death were evaluated using a questionnaire on psychosocial aspects validated in our area. It included various psychosocial variables that could affect such attitudes. The Student t test and chi-square test were used to evaluate the data.

RESULTS

We analyzed 277 respondents of mean age 43 +/- 8 years and 96% women. The level of acceptance of organ donation was 64% (n = 178), whereas 46% were either against or undecided (n = 98). The variables which determined the attitudes were understanding of brain death (P = .004); attitude toward cadaveric manipulation, especially toward autopsy (P = .013) and cremation (P = .004); concern about mutilation after donation (P = .014); religion (P = .032); partner's attitude toward donation (P < .0001); and possibility of needing an organ in the future (P = .031).

CONCLUSIONS

Ancillary hospital personnel had similar attitudes toward donation as those of the general public as observed in other studies. The attitudes were determined by many psychosocial factors. A campaign to raise awareness among professionals has become a priority, given that working in a hospital, their unfavorable attitude could have a strong negative impact on the general public.

Attitudes of Resident Doctors Toward Different Types of Organ Donation in a Spanish Transplant Hospital

OBJECTIVE

Our aim was to analyze acceptance of cadaveric and living organ donation for transplantation among resident doctors, given that they are the new professionals of medicine who will have to encourage and develop transplant programs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A random survey was performed on resident doctors in a third-level hospital with an organ transplant program which is accredited for undergraduate and postgraduate education (n = 171). Attitudes toward cadaveric and living donation were evaluated using a questionnaire including various psychosocial variables that might affect such attitudes. We used the Student t test and the chi-square test.

RESULTS

The sample was composed of responses by 171 resident doctors of mean age 28 +/- 4 years with 56% women. Attitudes toward cadaveric donation were favorable in 92% (n = 157). As for living donation, the percentage in favor of nonrelated donation was low: 23% for kidney and 19% for liver. However, when the donation was from a relative, the percentages increased to levels similar to those of cadaveric donation, namely 88% and 85% for kidney and liver, respectively. No differences were observed in attitudes toward cadaveric or living donation according to various psychosocial variables.

CONCLUSIONS

The trainee doctors showed favorable attitudes toward human cadaveric organ donation as well as living related donation, which suggests a relaunch of living donors in the near future. However, there was not much acceptance of nonrelated donation, as has also been seen in studies of the general public in our geographical area.

Attitudes Toward Organ Donation in Rural Areas of Southeastern Spain

OBJECTIVE

Rural areas present a worse attitude toward organ donation. However, the factors conditioning this attitude are not well known. Our aim was to determine the profile of the population opposed to donation in rural areas.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A random sample stratified by age and sex was obtained from municipalities with less than 10,000 inhabitants. Attitudes toward donation were assessed by a questionnaire which evaluated variables that may influence these attitudes. A descriptive statistical study used the Student t test and chi-square test as well as a logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

Among 181 respondents, 63% were in favor of donation and 37% against or undecided. Among the reasons to be against donation were rejection of body mutilation (43%) and fear of apparent death (41%). The psychosocial variables against donation were age >or=44 years, primary education or below, no previous experience with donation, no prosocial activities, an unfavorable opinion of the partner, and fear of corpse mutilation. The variables persisting in the multivariate analysis were level of education, previous experience, prosocial activities, and fear of corpse manipulation.

CONCLUSIONS

Among the rural population the profile of a person opposed to donation was someone older than 44 years, with a low level of education and no previous experience with donation, who does not participate in prosocial activities and is opposed to corpse manipulation.

Attitudes toward living liver donation among hospital personnel in services not related to transplantation

INTRODUCTION

The deficiency in livers and waiting list mortality have encouraged more living liver donation, although it is not exempt from morbidity and mortality. The enthusiasm of transplant teams for this kind of donation is increasing; however, the attitudes toward it are not so clear among other health professionals. Our objective was to analyze the attitudes toward living liver donation among hospital professionals in services without habitual relations with transplantation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A random sample was stratified for service not related to transplantation and job category, in a third level hospital with a transplant program. Attitudes toward living liver donation were evaluated using a psychosocial questionnaire on living donation.

RESULTS

A total of 419 respondents were analyzed (doctors, n = 184; nurses, n = 119; assistant nurses, n = 80; and non-health workers, n = 36), with a mean age of 37 +/- 10 years. The attitude toward living liver donation was favorable in 82% (n = 344). Among the other respondents, half (9%; n = 38) were against and the other half (9%; n = 37) were undecided. No significant differences were found among the doctors, nurses, assistants, and non-health workers. However, when the three categories were grouped in opposition to the non-health workers, there was greater indecision among non-health workers than the others (19% vs 8%; P = .0001). On analyzing the variables that determine this attitude we observed the following: having commented upon and previously discussed donation (P = .016); believing in the possibility of needing an organ oneself (P = .0001); and being in favor of living kidney donation (P = .0001) and cadaveric donation (P = .004).

CONCLUSIONS

Hospital personnel in services not related to transplantation favor living liver donation, especially if it is a related donation, despite its greater risk, except among non-health workers. However, it is important to conduct informative and awareness-raising campaigns in hospitals if such a type of transplantation is to be encouraged.

Pathology findings in a model of auxiliary liver transplantation with portal vein arterialization in pigs

OBJECTIVE

To determine the histological findings and temporal evolution that occur in auxiliary liver grafts as a consequence of arterialization of the portal vein (PVA).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We evaluated 10 auxiliary heterotopic liver transplants with arterialization of the PVA. The histological study was performed using an optical microscope to process liver samples with staining using hematoxylin and eosin. A biopsy of native liver tissue was used as a control.

RESULTS

Two animals were excluded from the study, one due to ischemic necrosis of the graft and one that died 4 hours after transplant. All of the remaining eight animals underwent a histological study at 1 day, 7 days, and 14 days. The most significant histological findings were: (1) dilation of portal areas and sinusoids, which were detected at 24 hours and persisted; (2) thickening of the interlobular septum, which was observed after day 7 and progressively increased to day 14; (3) bile duct hyperplasia detected at the seventh day.

CONCLUSIONS

The consistent, early findings in a pig liver with PVA included vascular dilation of the portal area and the sinusoids, with bile duct hyperplasia extending progressively and the thickening of interlobular connective tissue septa with a generalized perilobular connective tissue reaction, which did not seem to alter the internal structure of the lobule, which showed histologically normal hepatocytes. The fibrous reaction may be the first stage in chronic hepatopathy. Further long-term studies are required in this model.

The primary care physician faced with organ donation: attitudinal study in South-Eastern Spain

INTRODUCTION

Attitude of health personnel, especially of physicians, has a significant influence on populational attitude towards organ donation and transplantation. The objective here is to analyse the attitude of Primary Care (PC) physicians towards cadaveric organ donation and transplantation and to determine the factors which condition this attitude.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A random sample was stratified by geographical location (six health areas of our community) among PC physicians. A total of 155 responses from 32 health centres were collected. Attitude towards donation was evaluated using a psychosocial attitudinal questionnaire about donation validated in our geographical area. The co-ordinator of physicians in each centre was contacted in each centre and was made responsible for distribution and collection of the questionnaires which were completed anonymously. The chi2 test and Student's t-test were applied.

RESULTS

88% (n=136) of the PC physicians are in favour of organ donation, 1% (n=2) are against and 11% (n=17) are undecided. Up to 84% of the PC physicians (n=130) have attended to transplant patients, although this fact is not related to a more positive attitude towards donation (p=0.059). In addition, 64% (n=99) have provided favourable information about organ donation and transplantation to their patients and one of the physicians admits having provided unfavourable information about the matter. On analysing the psychosocial variables which influence such an attitude, a relationship has only been found with respect to two variables: attitude towards cadaveric manipulation (p=0.035) and a partner's opinion towards the subject (p=0.006).

CONCLUSIONS

PC physicians have a very favourable attitude towards donation of their own organs and constitute a positive source of information on the subject for the general public.

Attitudes Toward Xenotransplantation Among Nonhealth Service Workers in a Hospital With a Preclinical Xenotransplantation Program

INTRODUCTION

Our hypothesis was that nonhealth workers (NHW) in our hospital should have a more favorable opinion toward xenotransplantation than the general population, given that this group is in closer contact with a preclinical xenotransplantation program. Therefore, our objective was to determine the attitude of NHW in a hospital with a preclinical liver xenotransplantation program and to determine the factors that influenced this attitude.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A random sample of 276 subjects in nonhealth services was used. For the distribution of the questionnaire, we contacted the head of each of the services and explained the project. They became responsible for the distribution and collection of the questionnaires in randomly selected work shifts. A random sample of 250 individuals from our community was used as a control group.

RESULTS

As for animal organ donation for humans, if the results could be superimposed on those achieved by human donors, 63% would be in favor, 30% undecided, and the remaining 7% against. The attitude toward xenotransplantation was more favorable in the control group (74% versus 63%, P < .05). On analyzing the variables that influence attitudes toward xenotransplantation, we found that there is no significant relationship to the classical psychosocial variables (P > .05). However, there is a relationship to prior attitudes toward different types of human organ donation and the possibility of needing a transplant oneself.

CONCLUSIONS

The attitudes toward xenotransplantation among NHW are not as favorable as in the general population.

Attitude Survey of Hospital Workers in the Surgical Services Toward Living Kidney Donation

INTRODUCTION

A living donor kidney is currently the most accepted kind of solid organ donation, given the low level of morbidity and mortality and the good results in the recipient. In Spain, its use is still scarce; even many health service workers are not in favor. Our objective was to analyze the attitudes toward living kidney donation in a surgical department.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A random sample was stratified according to surgical services and job category in a tertiary hospital with an solid organ transplant program. Attitudes toward living kidney donation were evaluated using a questionnaire on donation and transplantation, which evaluated various psychosocial variables. Student's t test and the Chi square test were used.

RESULTS

Two hundred sixty-three respondents of mean age 40 +/- 10 years were analysed for attitudes toward living kidney donation. The level of acceptance was 87% (n = 229) versus 13% undecided or against the procedure (n = 34). No differences were observed according to job category. The variables that showed a relationship with the attitude were the partner's attitude toward donation (P = .049); the possible need for an organ oneself (P = .0001); and belief that medical errors occur (P = .001). The attitude toward cadaveric organ donation was not reflective of that toward living kidney donation (P = .241).

CONCLUSIONS

A favorable attitude toward living kidney donation was high among hospital staff of the surgical department. Those for whom it was not favorable were influenced by personal factors such as partner's attitude and the possibility of needing a kidney in the future.

Attitude Toward Deceased Organ Donation and Transplantation Among the Workers in the Surgical Services in a Hospital With a Transplant Program

INTRODUCTION

There are data that suggest that the percentage of hospital workers not in favor of donation is relatively high, even in services that are directly related to transplantation. The objective was to analyze attitudes toward decreased organ donation in the surgical services.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A random sample was stratified by the surgical service and the job category (n = 263) in a third-level hospital with a transplant program assessed attitudes toward the donation of ones own organs after death using a questionnaire including psychosocial factors as validated in our geographic surroundings. Student t test and the chi-square test were used for data analysis.

RESULTS

Favorable attitudes toward donation were observed in 68% (n = 178) as opposed to 32% with an attitude that was undecided or against the act (n = 85). The psychosocial variables that showed significant relationships with this attitude were age (most in favor are younger; P = .021); nonmedical surgical staff (50% against donation; P = .0001); resident physicians (94% in favor; P = .001); discussion and prior consideration of donation (P = .016); knowledge of the concept of brain death (an important factor in nonhealth staff; P = .010); attitude toward manipulation of the deceased (P = .011) and concerns about mutilation (P = .026); partner's opinion toward organ donation (P = .0001); and existence of frequent medical errors (P = .003). No significant differences were found, depending on whether the services were involved in a specific transplant program (P = .853).

CONCLUSIONS

Favorable attitudes toward donation among the hospital staff on surgical services, including those who perform transplants, did not reach more than 70% and was determined by multiple psychosocial factors. Donation promotion activities are necessary for these services, given the importance that this group's negative attitude could have on the attitude of the general population.

Attitude Toward Living Related Donation of Patients on the Waiting List for a Deceased Donor Solid Organ Transplant

INTRODUCTION

Spain is the country with the highest rate of donation from deceased individuals. However, given the deficit in organs, living donation is being encouraged. Our objective was to analyze attitudes toward living donation among patients on the waiting list for a transplant.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients on the waiting list for a kidney or liver transplant (n = 96; 46 kidney and 50 liver) in the last year had their attitudes toward living donation evaluated through a psychosocial survey performed in a direct interview with an independent health professional from the transplant unit and analyzed by Student t test and the chi-square test.

RESULTS

Ninety-one percent were in favor of donating their organs when they die, 6% had doubts, and the remaining 3% were against it. Twenty percent would accept living donation from a family member (32% in liver vs 7% in kidney; P < .05), despite 89% of them accepting that there would be a risk to the family member. Twenty percent reported that a family member had suggested donating, but the patient was opposed. Finally, only 6% considered living donation to be their first choice, 42% did not consider this option. Up to 96% would donate an organ to a family member if they were requested to do so.

CONCLUSION

Patients on the waiting list are not favorable to living related donation for themselves, although members of their family have proposed it to them. However, the liver patient is more prepared to accept it, possibly because that patient has no other alternative as do kidney patients have dialysis. Even so, they are favorable toward donating a living organ if a family member were to request one. In general, living donation is not being proposed to these patients as a real option, partly because of their doctors.

Attitude of Primary Care Nurses Toward Living Kidney Donation

INTRODUCTION

Nursing is a fundamental service in caring for the health of the public. The opinion of nurses toward a certain type of donation may have a strong population impact. In this respect, living kidney donation is increasing in Spain; it is important to raise awareness at all levels. The objective here was to analyze the attitudes of primary care nursing personnel toward living kidney donation and to their determinants.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A random sample of primary care nurses stratified by geographical location (six health areas in our community), included 139 nurses from 32 health centres. Attitudes toward living donation were evaluated using a questionnaire with various psychosocial variables. For the distribution of the questionnaires, contact was made with the nursing coordinator in each centre. They were completed anonymously. The chi-squared test and Student's t test were applied.

RESULTS

The attitudes toward living kidney donation were favorable in 93% of those questioned (n = 129), mainly when the donation is related (78%, n = 109). Only one nurse was against the idea of donating a kidney from a living person (1%); nine had doubts about this kind of donation (7%). Seventy-six percent (n = 106) have cared for patients awaiting a transplant; however, no relationship was found with attitude toward this type of donation (P = .209). Of all analyzed variables, there was only a significant relationship with concern about possible body mutilation (P < .0005) and partner's opinion about the matter (P < .0005). We wish to highlight that no relationship was found with attitudes toward cadaveric organ donation (P = .712).

CONCLUSIONS

Attitudes of primary care nursing personnel toward living kidney donation were favorable, especially if it was related donation.

Attitude Toward Xenotransplantation Among Residents

INTRODUCTION

The deficit in transplant organs has made it necessary to search for alternatives, among them research into xenotransplantation. However, the use of animal organs may cause rejection in society and among health professionals. The objective was to analyze the acceptance of this therapy among Residents, given that they would be the professionals most involved in its application if such a therapy proves to be useful.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A random sample stratified by the services of the Residents in a third-level hospital with an organ transplant program and accredited for teaching at undergraduate and postgraduate levels (n = 171). The attitude toward xenotransplantation was evaluated using a questionnaire that analyzes different pychosocial variables that may influence such attitude.(5)

RESULTS

The sample consisted of 171 residents (mean age 28 +/- 4 years; 56% women). Attitudes toward xenotransplantation, whether the results were similar to those obtained with human organs, were positive in 81% (n = 138) of cases, with 16% (n = 27) having doubts and 3% (n = 6) being against. The attitude was more favorable among residents in favor of cadaveric donation (83% vs 57%; P < .05) and of living donation either of the kidney (90% vs 55%; P < .001) or of the liver (88% vs 56%; P < .001), and among those who consider that they might need a transplant at a given point in the future (88% vs 73%; P < .05).

CONCLUSION

Residents have a positive attitude toward the application of a possible xenotransplantation in safe conditions similar to those that currently exist in human organ donation. Such a favorable attitude was greatly influenced by a positive attitude toward human organ donation, in cadaveric as well as in living donation, and when considering oneself to be a possible candidate for a transplant.

Attitude Toward Xenotransplantation in Kidney and Liver Patients on the Transplant Waiting List

INTRODUCTION

The deficit in transplant organs is encouraging research into stem cells and xenotransplantation. However, many studies have shown that using animals for human transplantation could be rejected by society. The objective here was to analyze the attitude of patients on the waiting list toward a possible transplant of an organ of animal origin.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients on the waiting list for kidney and liver transplants including last year (n = 96) underwent a direct interview by an independent health professional from the transplant unit. Using a psychosocial survey, an evaluation was made of attitudes toward donation of organs of animal origin and its various options. Student t test and the chi-square test were used for analysis.

RESULTS

If results from xenotransplantation could be superimposed onto those of human transplantation, 71% would accept such an organ. In the case of the kidney, 83% would accept, 4% would not, and 13% have doubts; as opposed to 60%, 12%, and 28%, respectively, of liver cases (P < .05). Supposing that the results were worse than in human organs, only 26% would accept an animal organ. Thus, for kidney, 33% would accept it, 48% would not, and 20% would have doubts; and for liver, it would be 20%, 50%, and 30%, respectively. In a life-threatening situation 98% would accept an animal organ as a bridge of hope in the wait for a human organ. In addition, if the organ functioned correctly, 98% would keep the animal organ, thus avoiding an intervention to substitute a human organ.

CONCLUSION

If xenotransplantation became a clinical reality, acceptance of an animal organ by patients on the waiting list would be low, especially if the results could not be superimposed onto human ones. Only its use as a bridge until the arrival of a human organ would increase its acceptance.

Acceptance Level of Living Liver Donation Among Primary Care Nursing Personnel

INTRODUCTION

Living liver donation is not exempt from risks to the donor, although it is currently ethically accepted. It is important to examine the level of acceptance among the different health levels toward this therapeutic option, in order to design promotion and awareness-raising activities. The objective herein was to analyze the attitudes and the factors that condition them among nursing personnel in Primary Care (PC) toward living liver donation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This random survey was stratified by geographical location (6 health areas in our community) among PC nurses, obtaining a total of 139 nurses from 34 health centers. Attitudes toward living liver donation were evaluated using a questionnaire on donation which included different psychosocial variables. For the distribution of the questionnaire, the nursing coordinator of each centers was contacted to distribute questionnaires which were completed anonymously. The chi-square test and Student t test were applied.

RESULTS

Attitudes toward living liver donation were favorable in 89% of those questioned (n = 124) if it is related donation; 3% (n = 4) were against donating a living hemiliver and 8% (n = 11) had doubts. It is important that up to 76% (n = 106) have cared for transplant patients or patients awaiting transplant, however, no relationship was observed with attitude to this type of donation (P = .489). Of all the analyzed variables, there was only a significant relationship between attitudes and concern about possible body mutilation (P < .0005), and partners attitudes toward this matter (P < .0005). It is noteworthy that no relationship was found with attitudes toward cadaveric donation (P = .062).

CONCLUSION

Despite the risk of morbidity and mortality in the donor, the attitude of the PC nursing personnel toward living liver donation was favorable, especially if the donation is related.

Rural Primary Care Centers as a Source of Information About Organ Donation

INTRODUCTION

Primary care is an important way of promoting health in the community, and this includes organ donation. In rural areas, this way of promoting health acquires special importance. Our objective was to analyze attitudes toward organ donation among primary care workers in rural health centers to assess their importance in circulating information about donation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A random sample, stratified according to job category among the primary care staff (n = 160), of workers in rural areas in our autonomous community (population < 10,000 inhabitants), evaluated attitudes toward donation using a questionnaire validated in our geographic area. To distribute the questionnaire it was necessary to contact the following in each health center: the coordinating physician, the nursing coordinator, and an administrative worker.

RESULTS

Of those questioned, 78% (n = 124) were in favor of donation, as opposed to 22% (n = 36) who are against it or undecided. As for the job category, physicians and nurses showed a more favorable attitude than nonhealth workers (90% and 80% vs 61%; P = .000). The psychosocial variables that were related to such an attitude were knowledge of the concept of brain death (P = .013) and lack of fear of manipulation of the deceased person (P = .002). Regarding information about organ donation and transplantation, 54% (n = 86) reported having been provided favorable information, with up to a quarter of the physicians considering other programs to be of greater interest for primary care than organ donation and transplantation.

CONCLUSION

Attitudes toward organ donation were favorable among a high percentage of primary care workers in rural centers; more than 50% have circulated favorable information on the subject. However, there is a high percentage with a negative or undecided attitude, especially among nonhealth workers, which should be reversed with promotional activities at the level of the health center.

[Multivariate study of the psychosocial factors affecting public attitude towards organ donation]

INTRODUCTION

Organ transplantation is a therapy which depends on society for its development. The objectives here are: 1) to understand the structure of public opinion towards organ donation in the population aged over 15 years of age in our Community; 2) to analyse the psychosocial variables which affect this opinion and 3) to define the population profiles on this matter.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Random sample (n = 2.000) stratified for age, sex and geographical location (error for 95.5%, e +/- 2.24) to whom we apply a questionnaire about the psychosocial aspects of organ donation. Descriptive statistics, Student's t-test, Chi-squared test and logistical regression analysis.

RESULTS

63% have a favourable attitude towards organ donation, of which 11% have a donor's card. A statistical association has been observed between favourable public opinion and different psychosocial variables (p < 0.05), with some independent variables persisting in the multivariate analysis such as age, level of education (OR = 1.78), information given by family members (OR = 1.62), health workers (OR = 2.01) and talks in educational centres (OR = 2.13); previous experience with donation and transplantation (OR = 2.02), knowledge of the concept of brain death (OR = 1.4); partner's favourable opinion towards donation (OR = 2.6), being a blood donor (OR = 3), taking part in prosocial activities (OR = 1.6) and attitude towards incineration of the cadaver after death (OR = 1.8).

CONCLUSIONS

The profile of a person who is against donation is of a man or woman, > 50 years of age, with primary studies or below, with no previous experience of the matter, who does not understand the concept of brain death nor their partner's opinion towards donation, who has not found out any information about donation through specialised forums, with an unfavourable opinion towards blood donation or pro-social activities and who is fearful of manipulation of the cadaver after death.

Socio-personal factors influencing public attitude towards living donation in south-eastern Spain

OBJECTIVES

Our aim was to determine public attitudes towards living donation compared with cadaveric donation, and to analyse psycho-social factors that may influence this attitude.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An opinion poll was used to study a random sample in two geographical areas (urban and rural). Assessment was made of attitudes towards donation of one's own organs as a living donor to an unknown person, as a living donor to a relative and/or close acquaintance and, as a cadaveric donor, and of the different psycho-social variables that may influence this attitude.

RESULTS

In the urban setting, 60% had a favourable response towards cadaveric donation; 29% were in favour of living kidney donation to an unknown person, a percentage which increased to 89% for donation to a relative or a friend. These rates were lower for liver (21 and 74%, respectively). When asked if they would accept an organ donated by a relative or a friend, 67% would accept a kidney and 60% a liver. Attitude towards living donation to an unknown person is more positive among those in favour of cadaveric donation and those who have had previous experience of donation. With respect to level of education, university students are more undecided about living donation to an unknown person than the other groups. In terms of attitude towards donation to relatives and/or friends, there is also the influence of social factors (sex, marital status). However, if the living donation is intended for oneself, there is no variable with which to associate this attitude. In the rural setting, 56% of the respondents refused to complete the survey due to fear of living donation. No statistical study was conducted due to the bias of the rural sample.

CONCLUSIONS

There is great fear and ignorance of living donation among the rural population, and uncertainties in the urban population, although attitudes are more positive towards living donation to relatives and/or friends than towards cadaveric donation. These positive attitudes towards living donation are very strongly related to attitudes towards cadaveric donation, previous experience of donation and level of education.

Influence of different sources of information on attitude toward organ donation: a factor analysis

OBJECTIVES

To determine media through which the population receives information on donation; to analyze the association between the sources of information and the psychosocial variables with respect to the opinion on donation; and to determine how each source of information influences this opinion.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A questionnaire on donation was administered to a random sample of 2000 persons stratified by age, gender, and geographical location, of whom 1143 respondents claimed to have no experience with donation and/or transplantation. A statistical analysis was done between the sources of information or the psychosocial variables or their co-variation to determine their specific impact on the population.

RESULTS

The medium with the greatest impact on the population is television; the second factor is the press and radio; the third is magazines and talks with friends/family; the fourth is hoardings and posters, and campaigns about organ donation; and the last factor is information given by health professionals. In the factor analysis between sources of information and psychosocial variables, an association was observed between press, radio, and information given by health professionals and a higher education level; and between information provided by discussions in schools, by age, and a higher level of education. Sources of Information sources as that have a favorable effect on donation include discussions, (P = .0079), and information by health professionals (P < .0005) and by friends (P = .0132) and by family (P = .0044).

CONCLUSIONS

Opinion on donation is more favorable among subjects who have received information on an individual basis and at specialized meetings. The only psychosocial variable associated with some sources of information is the level of education.

Socio-personal profile of teenagers opposed to organ donation

BACKGROUND

The teenage population has a more favourable attitude towards organ donation than other population groups. Teenagers represent the future of the community and their opinion directly affects other family members and friends. Therefore, teenagers who are in favour of donation become promoters of organ donation in their area of influence. Our aim was to determine the opinion and fears of the teenage population regarding organ donation in order to define the profile of the subgroup, which is opposed to donation.

METHODS

We used a random stratified sample according to gender and geographical location of 15-19-year-old adolescents. The attitude towards organ donation was assessed using the questionnaire on psychosocial aspects of donation. The variables were grouped into socio-personal, donation awareness, social interaction, pro-social activities and attitude towards the body. Data were analysed by descriptive statistics, the chi(2) test, Student's t-test and a logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

Seventy-three per cent of teenagers have a favourable attitude towards organ donation. Twenty-seven per cent are undecided or have negative attitudes; the main reason given is fear of apparent death (48%). Variables with statistical significance, which are against donation, are a low level of education (P = 0.0456), no previous experience with organ donation (P = 0.0254), no knowledge of the brain death concept (P = 0.0054) and refusal to accept cadaver manipulation (P = 0.0037).

CONCLUSION

The profile of the teenager who is opposed to organ donation is one who has only primary schooling or who left school early, is not engaged in pro-social activities, rejects cadaver manipulation and has no knowledge of the brain death concept.

Description of a new auxiliary heterotopic partial liver transplantation technique with portal vein arteriolization of applicability in heterotopic liver xenotransplantation

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to describe a new model of auxiliary heterotopic partial liver transplantation with portal vein arterialization.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Three standard hepatectomies were performed in pigs. The left lateral lobe was surgically resected and portal vein arteriolization constructed by an end-to-side "Y" anastomoses between the distal to the celiac axis aorta and the portal vein.

RESULTS

The graft was placed in the left iliaca fossa using anastomoses of the donor infrahepatic inferior cava vein end-to-side to the host infrarenal inferior vein and the donor aortic stump with portal vein arteriolization end-to-side to the left iliac artery. After graft reperfusion, the 3 recipients showed intraoperative hypotension, which was treated with fluid administration and vasoactive drugs. At the end of the operation, the graft displayed normal arterial blood flow and good venous drainage. The donor liver graft appeared more red than the host liver, which was due to the increased arterial blood flow. One pig of 3 died at 24 hours after surgery, probably due to hypothermia. However, the other 2 pigs survived the procedure and remained stable. Echographic monitoring showed intrahepatic arterial expansion, which may be the result of high blood pressure due to the arteriolization procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

We have developed a novel and easy to perform technique that diminishes the number of anastomoses and does not involve vessels from other organs.

Psychosocial profile in favor of organ donation

INTRODUCTION

The lack of organ donation continues to be a major limiting factor in transplantation. Our aims are: (1) to define the psychosocial profile against organ donation, and (2) to determine the impact of a law on the procurement and transplantation of organs based on "presumed consent" in the population.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The population in this study (n = 2000) was randomly selected and stratified according to sex, age, and geographic localization. The attitude toward organ donation and transplantation was evaluated according to a questionnaire that probed psychosocial aspects of donation. Statistical comparisons were performed using the chi2 and logistic regression tests.

RESULTS

The population attitude toward organ donation was favorable in 63% of subjects, unfavorable in 31%, and 6% did not respond. With regard to the law based on "presumed consent," only 24% of the population agreed with the law; 53% thought it was an abuse of authority. The population subgroup with a negative attitude to the law was characterized by: age over 40 years, low educational level, no previous experience with organ donation or transplant, no experience in prosocial activities, a refusal to accept cadaver manipulation or mutilation, and lack of knowledge of the brain-death concept.

CONCLUSIONS

The psychosocial profile against donation is a person above 40 years with a low level of education who has never performed prosocial activities, did not have previous experience with organ donation or transplantation, displays no knowledge of the brain-death concept, and rejects cadaver manipulation. For these people a law based on "presumed consent" is considered an abuse of authority.

A novel subunit of yeast RNA polymerase III interacts with the TFIIB-related domain of TFIIIB70

There is limited information on how eukaryotic RNA polymerases (Pol) recognize their cognate preinitiation complex. We have characterized a polypeptide copurifying with yeast Pol III. This protein, C17, was found to be homologous to a mammalian protein described as a hormone receptor. Deletion of the corresponding gene, RPC17, was lethal and its regulated extinction caused a selective defect in transcription of class III genes in vivo. Two-hybrid and coimmunoprecipitation experiments indicated that C17 interacts with two Pol III subunits, one of which, C31, is important for the initiation reaction. C17 also interacted with TFIIIB70, the TFIIB-related component of TFIIIB. The interaction domain was found to be in the N-terminal, TFIIB-like half of TFIIIB70, downstream of the zinc ribbon and first imperfect repeat. Although Pol II similarly interacts with TFIIB, it is notable that C17 has no similarity to any Pol II subunit. The data indicate that C17 is a novel specific subunit of Pol III which participates together with C34 in the recruitment of Pol III by the preinitiation complex.

A subunit of yeast TFIIIC participates in the recruitment of TATA-binding protein

TFIIIC plays a key role in nucleating the assembly of the initiation factor TFIIIB on class III genes. We have characterized an essential gene, TFC8, encoding the 60-kDa polypeptide, tau60, present in affinity-purified TFIIIC. Hemagglutinin-tagged variants of tau60 were found to be part of TFIIIC-tDNA complexes and to reside at least in part in the downstream DNA-binding domain tauB. Unexpectedly, the thermosensitive phenotype of N-terminally tagged tau60 was suppressed by overexpression of tau95, which belongs to the tauA domain, and by two TFIIIB components, TATA-binding protein (TBP) and B"/TFIIIB90 (but not by TFIIIB70). Mutant TFIIIC was deficient in the activation of certain tRNA genes in vitro, and the transcription defect was selectively alleviated by increasing TBP concentration. Coimmunoprecipitation experiments support a direct interaction between TBP and tau60. It is suggested that tau60 links tauA and tauB domains and participates in TFIIIB assembly via its interaction with TBP.

A chimeric subunit of yeast transcription factor IIIC forms a subcomplex with tau95

The multisubunit yeast transcription factor IIIC (TFIIIC) is a multifunctional protein required for promoter recognition, transcription factor IIIB recruitment, and chromatin antirepression. We report the isolation and characterization of TFC7, an essential gene encoding the 55-kDa polypeptide, tau55, present in affinity-purified TFIIIC. tau55 is a chimeric protein generated by an ancient chromosomal rearrangement. Its C-terminal half is essential for cell viability and sufficient to ensure TFIIIC function in DNA binding and transcription assays. The N-terminal half is nonessential and highly similar to a putative yeast protein encoded on another chromosome and to a cyanobacterial protein of unknown function. Partial deletions of the N-terminal domain impaired tau55 function at a high temperature or in media containing glycerol or ethanol, suggesting a link between PolIII transcription and metabolic pathways. Interestingly, tau55 was found, together with TFIIIC subunit tau95, in a protein complex which was distinct from TFIIIC and which may play a role in the regulation of PolIII transcription, possibly in relation to cell metabolism.

Tau91, an essential subunit of yeast transcription factor IIIC, cooperates with tau138 in DNA binding

Transcription factor IIIC (TFIIIC) (or tau) is a large multisubunit and multifunctional factor required for transcription of all class III genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. It is responsible for promoter recognition and TFIIIB assembly. We report here the cloning and characterization of TFC6, an essential gene encoding the 91-kDa polypeptide, tau91, present in affinity-purified TFIIIC. Tau91 has a predicted molecular mass of 74 kDa. It harbors a central cluster of His and Cys residues and has basic and acidic amino acid regions, but it shows no specific similarity to known proteins or predicted open reading frames. The TFIIIC subunit status of tau91 was established by the following biochemical and genetic evidence. Antibodies to tau91 bound TFIIIC-DNA complexes in gel shift assays; in vivo, a B block-deficient U6 RNA gene (SNR6) harboring GAL4 binding sites was reactivated by fusing the GAL4 DNA binding domain to tau91; and a point mutation in TFC6 (tau91-E330K) was found to suppress the thermosensitive phenotype of a tfc3-G349E mutant affected in the B block binding subunit (tau138). The suppressor mutation alleviated the DNA binding and transcription defects of mutant TFIIIC in vitro. These results indicated that tau91 cooperates with tau138 for DNA binding. Recombinant tau91 by itself did not interact with a tRNA gene, although it showed a strong affinity for single-stranded DNA.

A cryptic DNA binding domain at the COOH terminus of TFIIIB70 affects formation, stability, and function of preinitiation complexes

TFIIIC-dependent assembly of yeast TFIIIB on class III genes unmasks a high avidity of TFIIIB for DNA. TFIIIB contains TATA-binding protein (TBP), TFIIIB90/B", and TFIIIB70/Brf1, which is homologous to TFIIB. Using limited proteolysis, we have found that the COOH terminus of TFIIIB70 (residues 510-596) forms a protease-resistant domain that binds DNA tightly as seen by Southwestern, DNase I footprinting, and gel shift assays. Consistent with a role for this DNA binding activity, preinitiation complexes were formed less efficiently with truncated TFIIIB70 lacking the COOH-terminal domain and displayed an increased sensitivity to heparin. B' (TFIIIB70 + TBP).TFIIIC.DNA complexes were also particularly unstable. In addition, TFIIIB.TFIIIC.DNA complexes containing truncated TFIIIB70 were impaired in promoting transcription initiation.

A suppressor of mutations in the class III transcription system encodes a component of yeast TFIIIB

Class III genes depend on TFIIIB for recruitment of RNA polymerase III. Yeast TFIIIB is comprised of three components: TBP, TFIIIB70 and a 90 kDa polypeptide contained in the fraction B". We report the isolation of the yeast gene TFC7 which, based on genetic and biochemical evidence, encodes the 90 kDa polypeptide. TFC7 was isolated as a multicopy suppressor of temperature-sensitive mutations in the two largest subunits of TFIIIC. It is an essential gene, encoding a polypeptide of 68 kDa migrating with an apparent size of approximately 90 kDa. In gel shift assays, recombinant TFC7 protein (rTFC7) alone did not bind detectably to DNA, or to the TFIIIC-DNA complex even in the presence of TBP or TFIIIB70, but it was required to assemble the TFIIIB-TFIIIC-DNA complex. The two-hybrid assay pointed to an interaction between TFC7 protein and tau 131, the second largest subunit of TFIIIC (that also interacts with TFIIIB70). rTFC7p can replace the B" component of TFIIIB for synthesis of U6 RNA in a system reconstituted with recombinant TBP and TFIIIB70 polypeptides and highly purified RNA polymerase III. Surprisingly, specific transcription of the SUP4 tRNATyr gene promoted by rTFC7p was much weaker than with B". An additional factor activity, provided by the recently identified TFIIIE fraction, was required to restore control levels of transcription.

Complex interactions between yeast TFIIIB and TFIIIC

Transcription of yeast class III genes requires the sequential assembly of the general transcription factors TFIIIC and TFIIIB, and of RNA polymerase III, into an initiation complex composed of at least 25 polypeptides. The 70-kDa subunit of TFIIIB (TFIIIB70) is central in this network of interactions as it contacts both TATA-binding protein and a subunit of polymerase III. We show here that the TATA-binding protein interacts with the carboxyl-terminal part of TFIIIB70. TFIIIB70 also contacts TFIIIC (factor tau) via its tau 131 subunit. The protein domains of tau 131 and TFIIIB70 involved in this interaction, either positively or negatively, were mapped using the two-hybrid system. We provide evidence that intramolecular interactions mask functional domains in both polypeptides.

The yeast BDF1 gene encodes a transcription factor involved in the expression of a broad class of genes including snRNAs

While screening for genes that affect the synthesis of yeast snRNPs, we identified a thermosensitive mutant that abolishes the production of a reporter snRNA at the non-permissive temperature. This mutant defines a new gene, named BDF1. In a bdf1-1 strain, the reporter snRNA synthesized before the temperature shift remains stable at the non-permissive temperature. This demonstrates that the BDF1 gene affects the synthesis rather than the stability of the reporter snRNA and suggests that the BDF1 gene encodes a transcription factor. BDF1 is present in single copy on yeast chromosome XII, and is important for normal vegetative growth but not essential for cell viability. bdf1 null mutants share common phenotypes with several mutants affecting general transcription and are defective in snRNA production. BDF1 encodes a protein of 687 amino-acids containing two copies of the bromodomain, a motif also present in other transcription factors as well as a new conserved domain, the ET domain, also present in Drosophila and human proteins.

Directing transcription of an RNA polymerase III gene via GAL4 sites

A yeast chimeric RNA polymerase III transcription system was constructed to explore the ordered, multistep process of gene activation in vivo. A promoter-deficient U6 RNA gene harboring GAL4-binding sites could be reactivated by fusing the GAL4 DNA-binding domain to components of the general transcription factor TFIIIC (tau) or TFIIIB. Expression of chimeric tau 138 or tau 131 (but not tau 95) subunits activated transcription from GAL4-binding sites located at various positions, including upstream of or within the gene. The function(s) of the B block binding domain of TFIIIC was provided by the fused GAL4-(1-147) domain. The GAL4-(1-147)-TFIIIB70 fusion protein acted at a distance like an activator of transcription. In contrast, none of the 10 different GAL4-(1-147)-polymerase subunit fusions was able to induce transcription, suggesting that RNA polymerase recruitment is not sufficient to initiate transcription.