Influence on Busilvex pharmacokinetics of clonazepam compared to previous phenytoin historical data

This study investigated the effect of seizure prophylaxis on busulfan (Bu) plasma exposure. Twenty-four adult patients received an intravenous Bu-cyclophoshamide conditioning regimen prior to bone marrow transplantation. Busilvex (0.8 mg/kg) was administered every six hours during four consecutive days. Clonazepam (0.025 to 0.03 mg/kg/day as a continuous 12-h i.v. infusion) was administered at least 12 hours prior to i.v. Bu dosing and continued until 24 hours after the last dose. Pharmacokinetic (PK) data were compared with those previously collected in patients (n=127) treated with phenytoin for seizure prophylaxis. Through population PK analysis, a 10% average increase (coefficient of variation, RSE=5.35%) in total clearance of Bu was quantified when Bu was associated with clonazepam as compared to phenytoin, which was considered as not being clinically relevant. The suspected induction on Bu metabolism by phenytoin should have resulted in the opposite effect. The patient efficacy and safety profiles were comparable between the two cohorts.

Combination chemotherapy of vinorelbine and cisplatin: a phase I pharmacokinetic study in patients with metastatic solid tumors

BACKGROUND

Vinorelbine (VRL)-cisplatin (CDDP) is an active doublet for advanced non-small cell lung cancer. CDDP has a narrow therapeutic index and may produce a cumulative nephrotoxicity over the treatment period. This study was to assess the risks of drug-drug interaction (DDI) over 3 consecutive cycles of VRL-CDDP combined treatments.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

An open-label, nonrandomised, phase I study was carried out. Patients with normal hepatic/renal functions. D1: CDDP 100 mg/m2--D1, D8: oral VRL 60 mg/m2 q3w. Pharmacokinetics (PK) over the first 3 cycles. PK comparison between cycles and between study vs. literature.

RESULTS

Thirteen patients were evaluable for safety and PK. Adverse events were those frequently observed with CDDP or VRL, and consisted of hematological toxicities, nausea, vomiting and constipation. Concerning VRL and CDDP PK, no difference was detected between the 3 administrations nor between the study and reference values.

CONCLUSION

The absence of DDI between CDDP and oral VRL was demonstrated over 3 consecutive cycles of therapy.

Oral vinorelbine in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer: rationale and implications for patient management

Vinorelbine is an established treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), both as a single agent and in combination chemotherapy. Recently, an oral form of this agent has been developed. Before accepting an established agent in a different administration form, rigorous testing is required to answer such questions as reliable bioavailability, continued safety and preservation of efficacy. In addition, an oral agent must provide patient convenience and acceptance, while being an economically sound approach. Oral vinorelbine was found to have acceptable and reliable pharmacokinetic profiles at clinically relevant dosage levels. Oral vinorelbine was found to have approximately 40% bioavailability; thus, a dose of 80 mg/m(2) orally is the equivalent of 30 mg/m(2) intravenously, and 60 mg/m(2) orally is the equivalent of 25 mg/m(2) intravenously. Studies also concluded a lack of food effect on the administration of oral vinorelbine. In addition, no drug-drug interactions were found with a variety of commonly used antineoplastic agents.Vinorelbine, either orally or intravenously, has been investigated in randomised phase II trials as a single agent and in combination with cisplatin or carboplatin in patients with NSCLC. In general, response and survival results with oral vinorelbine appeared similar to the intravenous agent. Adverse-effect profiles were also similar for the two formulations. Clearly, the issue of venous irritation does not exist with oral vinorelbine; however, nausea and vomiting were more frequent when vinorelbine was administered orally compared with intravenously when no planned antiemetic therapy is given.

Phase I and pharmacokinetic (PK) dose-adjusted study of IV vinflunine (VFL) in cancer patients with liver dysfunction (LD): Pharmacokinetic results

2523

Background: VFL is a novel microtubule inhibitor of the vinca alkaloid class that has shown high antitumour activity in several in vivo tumour models and in clinical trials. VFL is mainly eliminated through metabolism and bile excretion. Therefore this trial was designed to determine if LD could increase exposure and toxicity of VFL and require a dose-adjustment. Methods: This trial had a sequential design with the objective of determining the maximal tolerated dose (MTD) and the recommended dose (RD) in three groups of LD based on clinical and biological criteria: mild (PT > 70% and UNL < serum bilirubin = 1.5xUNL), moderate (Child-Pugh A) and severe (Child-Pugh B). VFL and 4-O-deacetylvinflunine (DVFL), its only active metabolite, were quantified in whole blood during cycle 1. PK parameters (AUCinf, Cltot) were estimated using a non-compartmental analysis and were compared using a one-way ANOVA with group factor either between groups or between groups and a control group of 49 patients without LD enrolled in phase I trials). Results: Three VFL doses were investigated: The inter-individual variability (CV) in AUCinf was approximately 30% for all groups. Even if AUCinf increased between mild and moderate groups, no difference was demonstrated between moderate and severe LD groups. All individual values were within the range of control values. Cltot were also similar between groups and the control group. Statistical analysis did not evidence any significant difference between groups. No difference was observed in blood concentrations of DVFL compared to the control group. No relationship between dose limiting toxicity and blood exposure was evidenced. Conclusions: The results showed that vinflunine and DVFL pharmacokinetic parameters do not appear to be affected by the degree of LD. However, the dose of VFL has to be adjusted to the level of LD for safety reasons.

[Table: see text]

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Evaluation of oral versus intravenous dose of vinorelbine to achieve equivalent blood exposures in patients with solid tumours

Patient's preference is for oral chemotherapy when both oral and i.v. are available, provided that efficacy is equivalent. Reliable switch from oral to i.v. is possible if correspondence between respective doses has been established. Vinorelbine oral was developed as a line extension of VRL i.v. on the basis that similar AUCs result in similar activities. From a first crossover study on 24 patients receiving VRL 25 mg/m2 i.v. and 80 mg/m2 oral data extrapolation concluded on AUCs bioequivalence between Vinorelbine 30 mg/m2 i.v. and 80 mg/m2 oral. A new trial was performed to support this calculation. In a crossover design study on patients (PS 0-1) with advanced solid tumours (44% breast carcinoma), VRL was administered (30 mg/m2 i.v., 80 mg/m2 oral) with a standard meal and 5-HT3 antagonists, at 2 weeks interval. Pharmacokinetics was performed over 168 h and VRL was measured by LC-MS/MS. Statistics included bioequivalence tests. Forty-eight patients were evaluable for PK: median age 58 years (25-71), PS0/PS1: 20/28, M/F: 11/37. Mean AUCs were 1,230 +/- 290 and 1,216 +/- 521 ng/ml for i.v. and oral, respectively. The confidence interval of the AUC ratio (0.83-1.03) was within the required regulatory range (0.8-1.25) and proved the bioequivalence between the two doses. The absolute bioavailability was 37.8 +/- 16.0%, and close to the value from the first study (40%). Patient tolerability was globally comparable between both forms with no significant difference on either haematological or non-haematological toxicities (grade 3-4). This new study, conducted on a larger population, confirmed the reliable dose correspondence previously established between vinorelbine 80 mg/m2 oral and 30 mg/m2 i.v.

A high performance liquid chromatography method for vinorelbine and 4-O-deacetyl vinorelbine: A decade of routine analysis in human blood

A sensitive high performance liquid chromatographic method was developed and validated for the simultaneous quantification of vinorelbine and its active metabolite, 4-O-deacetyl vinorelbine, in human biological fluids. These two compounds together with vinblastine, used as internal standard, were extracted from blood and urine by a liquid-liquid process using diethyl ether, and followed by a back-extraction in acidic conditions. Then, they were analysed through a cyano column and detected in ultraviolet at 268 nm. The assay linearity was validated up to 2000 ng/ml. The lower limit of quantification was set at 2.5 ng/ml. The between-run precision and accuracy were always higher than 94%. Biological samples were stable when stored at -80 degrees C over 2 years. The long-term reproducibility and the suitability of this analytical method were demonstrated within the last decade through the analysis of about 7000 samples during the clinical development of i.v. and oral formulations of vinorelbine. Because vinorelbine binds mainly to platelets and blood cells and because this binding is rapidly reversible and highly influenced by environmental conditions, drug concentration in plasma may be highly influenced by the sampling conditions and the centrifugation process used to separate blood cells from plasma. Therefore, this method was developed in blood and then used for sample analyses in routine. The major benefit was that it was easy for nurses to directly collect blood instead of plasma and that reduced volume of sampling could be withdrawn from frail patients. Furthermore, the analysis in blood enabled to quantify vinorelbine and 4-O-deacetyl vinorelbine concentrations for a longer period of time, which resulted in a more accurate evaluation of pharmacokinetic parameters.

Development of a sensitive liquid chromatography method coupled with a tandem mass spectrometric detection for the clinical analysis of vinflunine and 4-O-deacetyl vinflunine in blood, urine and faeces

A sensitive and specific liquid chromatographic method coupled with tandem mass spectrometric detection was set up and fully validated for the simultaneous quantification of vinflunine (VFL) and its pharmacologically active metabolite, 4-O-deacetyl vinflunine (DVFL). The two compounds, as well as vinblastine (used as internal standard), were deproteinised from blood and faeces, analysed on a cyano type column and detected on a Micromass Quattro II system in the positive ion mode after ionisation using an electrospray ion source. In blood, linearity was assessed up to 200 ng/ml for vinflunine and 100 ng/ml for 4-O-deacetyl vinflunine. The lower limit of quantification was validated at 250 pg/ml for both compounds. In other biological media, the linearity was assessed within the same range; the limit of quantification was adjusted according to the expected concentration levels of each compound. This method was first developed in order to identify the structures and to elucidate the metabolic pathway of vinflunine. Thanks to its high sensitivity and specificity, the method has enabled the quantification of vinflunine and 4-O-deacetyl vinflunine in blood at trace levels, and has contributed to the knowledge of vinflunine metabolism by monitoring up to 10 metabolites.

Prospective validation of a novel IV busulfan fixed dosing for paediatric patients to improve therapeutic AUC targeting without drug monitoring

INTRODUCTION

Oral busulfan clearance is age-dependent and children experience a wide variability in plasma exposure. BSA- or age-based dosing is used with therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) to reduce this variability.

PURPOSE

A new intravenous (IV) dosing of busulfan (Bu) based on body weight, designed to improve AUC targeting without TDM and dose-adjustment, was prospectively evaluated.

METHOD

Bu was administered as a 2 h IV infusion every 6 h over 4 days (16 administrations). Five dose levels were defined on body weight as follows: 1.0 mg/kg for <9 kg; 1.2 mg/kg for 9 to <16 kg; 1.1 mg/kg for 16-23 kg; 0.95 mg/kg for >23-34 kg; 0.80 mg/kg for >34 kg. Bu treatment was followed by Cyclophosphamide or Melphalan prior to allogeneic or autologous transplantation in 55 children aged 0.3-17.2 years (median 5.6 years).

RESULTS

No difference in AUC values was observed between weight strata (mean +/- SD 1248 +/- 205 micromol.min), whereas a significant difference in Bu clearance was demonstrated. This new dosing enabled to achieve a mean exposure comparable to that in adults. At dose 1, 91% of patients achieved the targeted AUC range (900-1500 micromol.min) while no patients were underexposed. At doses 9 and 13, over 75% of patients remained within that target whilst most of the others were slightly above. Successful engraftment was achieved in all patients. In conclusion, from infants to adults this new dosing enabled, without TDM and dose adjustment, to successfully target a therapeutic AUC window.

Lack of pharmacokinetic interaction when switching from fluoxetine to milnacipran

The lack of a therapeutic effect or unsupportable side-effects can lead to substitution of one antidepressant by another. The present study investigated potential modifications to the pharmacokinetic profile of milnacipran at steady-state when it is substituted for fluoxetine without any washout period. The open-label, multiple dose, three-period study was carried out in 12 evaluable healthy volunteers. A reference period (period 1) comprising a 3.5-day treatment with milnacipran at 50 mg b.i.d. was followed, after a 5-10-day washout, by 3 weeks of administration of 20 mg fluoxetine once daily (period 2), immediately followed by a further 3.5 days of administration of milnacipran at 50 mg b.i.d. (period 3). Blood samples collected at each period were analysed for milnacipran, N-dealkyl milnacipran, fluoxetine and norfluoxetine. Potential drug-drug interactions were evaluated by comparing milnacipran pharmacokinetic parameters between periods 1 and 3. A steady-state of fluoxetine and its metabolite was effectively reached by the end of the 3-week period. A steady-state of milnacipran was reached on day 2 of both periods 1 and 3. Trough concentrations of milnacipran were 66 and 65 ng/ml before and after the fluoxetine administration period, respectively. Cmax values were 226 and 248 ng/ml. When comparing the kinetic parameters of milnacipran before and after fluoxetine treatment, all the 90% confidence intervals were in the 20% range. No significant difference in the adverse events of milnacipran was observed before or after fluoxetine administration.

Characterization of human cytochrome P450 isoenzymes involved in the metabolism of vinorelbine

Vinorelbine (VRL) (IV Navelbine) is a semi-synthetic vinca alkaloid, used in therapeutics for the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer and advanced breast cancer. The aim of this study was to characterize the cytochrome P450 (CYP) isoenzymes involved in VRL metabolism. VRL was incubated at 1.28 x 10(-5) m for 90 min with human hepatic microsomes prepared from 14 donors (one woman and 13 men aged from 27 to 76 years old) and characterized for CYP1A2, CYP2D6, CYP2E1 and CYP3A4 activities. A four-combined-approach study was performed, including correlation between CYP activities and VRL metabolism among the 14 batches of microsomes, inhibition of VRL biotransformation by isoform-selective substrates and by specific inhibitory antibodies, and incubation with supersomes. Analysis of unchanged VRL and its metabolites was performed using an HPLC method coupled with both radioactive and UV detections. No correlation between CYP1A2 or CYP2E1 and VRL metabolism was observed in the 14 batches of microsomes used. A correlation was shown between VRL metabolism and CYP3A4 activity as determined with the dextromethorphan N-demethylase and nifedipine oxidase activities (r(2)=0.80 and 0.59, respectively). These results were strengthened by a correlation between the metabolism extent of VRL and CYP3A4 protein content determined by immunoblotting (r(2)=0.75). Furthermore, VRL biotransformation was inhibited by troleandomycine, the CYP3A4-specific inhibitor substrate (80% of inhibition) and by anti-CYP3A antibodies (36% of inhibition). On the contrary, a low correlation with CYP2D6 activity as determined by dextrometorphan O-demethylation (r(2)=0.31) was established. CYP2D6 supersomes did not metabolize the drug whereas 63.4% of VRL were metabolized by microsomes overexpressing CYP3A4 isoform. These data indicated that CYP3A4 is the main enzyme involved in the hepatic metabolism of VRL in human, whereas CYP2D6 is not involved.

Oral versus intravenous vinorelbine: clinical safety profile

The availability of chemotherapeutic drugs administrable by oral route represents a step forward in the management of cancer patients. Among oral agents, vinorelbine is particularly interesting for its pharmacological characteristics and clinical efficacy. Oral vinorelbine is rapidly absorbed (1.5-3 hours) with an elimination half-life of approximately 40 hours. It shows a low level of binding to plasma proteins (13%), is highly bound to platelets (78%) and has a hepatic metabolism and an absolute bioavailability of 40% with a moderate and similar interpatient variability for the two forms. Food has no influence on the pharmacokinetic profile of oral vinorelbine even if nausea/vomiting is less frequent and less severe in the fed patients than in the fasting patients. Therefore, to ensure patient comfort, it is recommended that oral vinorelbine is administered with a snack. All the metabolites of oral vinorelbine have been identified and, among these, only deacetyl-vinorelbine presented activity demonstrating that for both oral and intravenous (i.v.) routes of administration the drug has the same metabolism pattern. Oral vinorelbine is eliminated mainly in a unconjugated form via the bile. In this process, the CYP 3A4 isoform of cytochrome P450 is mostly involved. Absorption of oral vinorelbine is not delayed in elderly patients. After oral administration, blood concentrations of vinorelbine in elderly patients are within the range of values observed in younger patients. The absolute bioavailability is close to 38% in elderly whereas it is close to 40% in younger patients. This difference is not significant. As compared to the intravenous drug, oral vinorelbine demonstrated linear pharmacokinetics as well an absolute bioavailability of approximately 40%, and a reliable dose-correspondence of 80 mg/m2 oral form --> 30 mg/m2 i.v. and 60 mg/m2 oral --> 25 mg/m2 i.v. Therefore, i.v. and oral forms show similar interindividual variability, same metabolism pattern, reproducible intra-patient blood exposure, and same pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationship. Oral vinorelbine has shown significant activity in advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Given at 60 mg/m2/week for the first 3 administrations and then increased to 80 mg/m2/week achieved the same efficacy as i.v. vinorelbine in terms of progression-free survival, overall survival, objective response. Mild-to-moderate gastrointestinal toxicity, easily manageable with standard treatment was recorded. Reproducible efficacy compared to previously reported results with vinorelbine i.v. Also, in advanced breast cancer, oral vinorelbine has shown significant activity with a good therapeutic index. Albeit no formal comparison between the oral and the intravenous formulations of vinorelbine has been made, however, the oral route seems to offer major advantages to patients who are faced with a clear decrease in the frequency of hospital admissions as compared to that needed to give intravenous chemotherapy.

Intravenous busulfan in adults prior to haematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a population pharmacokinetic study

An IV form of busulfan (IV Bu) has recently become available for high dose conditioning regimen before haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). This IV form is expected to reduce the high pharmacokinetic variability exhibited with oral busulfan and as a result, to better target the plasma area under the curve (AUC). Pharmacokinetics (PK) of IV Bu was investigated on 127 adult patients (333 PK administrations) who received 0.8 mg.kg-1 of Bu as a 2-h infusion every 6 h over 4 days, followed by cyclophosphamide (60 mg.kg-1 day-1x2). A retrospective population PK analysis was carried out to search for important predictive factors of IV Bu PK and to develop a limited sampling strategy (LSS) through Bayesian methodology. The analysis was conducted using the Non Linear Mixed Effect methodology and included a validation process on an independent data set. Adjusted Ideal Body Weight (AIBW) and Body Surface Area (BSA) were the best covariates to explain the inter-patient variability. The final inter-patient variability (CV=16%) in IV Bu clearance (Cltot) was estimated close to the intra-patient variability (CV=13%). There was neither age-dependency nor gender effect. IV Bu Cltot was not affected by elevated hepatic enzymes or by co-administration of either fluconazole or acetaminophen, and was not altered in heavily pre-treated or pre-transplanted patients. Normalised Cltot based on either AIBW or BSA was comparable between normal and obese patients (BMI=18-26.9 kg.m-2, >26.9 kg.m-2, respectively) whereas significant differences existed when based on either actual (ABW) or ideal body weight (IBW). As a consequence, no dose adjustment is required in obese patients when using a AIBW- or BSA-based dose calculation. A fixed dose of 0.80 mg.kg-1 of AIBW or 29 mg.m-2 of BSA yielded an average AUC of 1,200 microM.min, with 80% of patients within the "therapeutic" AUC range of 900-1,500 microM.min. Alternatively, 0.80 mg.kg-1 based on either ABW or IBW for normal patients and on AIBW for obese patients would achieve the same performance. A limited sampling strategy based on a Bayesian methodology was developed and validated on an independent dataset: AUCs obtained from one to two samplings were demonstrated to be reliably estimated.

Lack of Interaction of Milnacipran with the Cytochrome P450 Isoenzymes Frequently Involved in the Metabolism of Antidepressants

OBJECTIVE

To compare the pharmacokinetics of milnacipran in extensive metabolisers (EMs) and poor metabolisers (PMs) of sparteine and mephenytoin, and to assess the influence of multiple administrations of milnacipran on the activity of cytochrome P450 (CYP) isoenzymes through its own metabolism and through various probes, namely CYP2D6 (sparteine/dextromethorphan), CYP2C19 (mephenytoin), CYP1A2 (caffeine) and CYP3A4 (endogenous 6-beta-hydroxy-cortisol excretion).

METHODS

Twenty-five healthy subjects, 12 EMs for both sparteine/dextromethorphan and mephenytoin, nine EMs for mephenytoin and PMs for sparteine/dextromethorphan (PM(2D6)) and four PMs for mephenytoin and EMs for sparteine/dextromethorphan (PM(2C19)) were administered milnacipran as a single 50 mg capsule on day 1 followed by a 50 mg capsule twice daily for 7 days. The pharmacokinetics of milnacipran and its oxidative metabolites were assessed after the first dose (day 1) and after multiple administration (day 8), and were compared for differences between CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 PMs and EMs. Metabolic tests were performed before (day -2), during (days 1 and 8) and after (day 20) milnacipran administration.

RESULTS

Milnacipran steady state was rapidly achieved. Metabolism was limited: approximately 50% unchanged drug, 30% as glucuronide and 20% as oxidative metabolite (mainly F2800 the N-dealkyl metabolite). Milnacipran administration to PM2D6 and PM2C19 subjects did not increase parent drug exposure or decrease metabolite exposure. Milnacipran oxidative metabolism is not mediated through CYP2D6 or CYP2C19 polymorphic pathways nor does it significantly interact with CYP1A2, CYP2C19, CYP2D6 or CYP3A4 activities.

CONCLUSION

Limited reciprocal pharmacokinetic interaction between milnacipran and CYP isoenzymes would confer flexibility in the therapeutic use of the drug when combined with antidepressants. Drug-drug interaction risk would be low, even if the combined treatments were likely to inhibit CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 isoenzyme activities.

I.V. busulfan in pediatrics: a novel dosing to improve safety/efficacy for hematopoietic progenitor cell transplantation recipients

A retrospective population pharmacokinetic (PPK) analysis was performed in 24 pediatric patients (PEDS) (0.45-16.7 years old) receiving i.v. busulfan/cyclophosphamide (i.v. Bu/Cy 4) regimen prior to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. I.V. Bu doses were given as a 2-hour infusion every 6 h over 4 days. Initial dosing of i.v. Bu was 1 mg/kg for children < or =4 years old and 0.8 mg/kg for patients >4 years old. Bu plasma concentrations at doses 1, 9 and 13 were analyzed through a multivariate NONMEM analysis. A close log-linear relationship between body weight (BW) and i.v. Bu clearance was demonstrated with no further age-dependency or gender effect. The interpatient coefficient of variation (CV) in Bu clearance significantly decreased from 56% (covariate-free model) to 19% (BW covariate model) and reproducible i.v. Bu exposure between doses was illustrated (intraindividual CV=9%). Based on the PPK model, a novel Bu dosing regimen (ie: doses in mg/kg adjusted to discrete weight categories) for a better AUC targeting was developed by simulation on 1000 patients. Age-based dosing was demonstrated not to be clinically relevant with i.v. Bu. Use of the new BW-based dosing appears to be more appropriate for the PEDS.

Determination of milnacipran, a serotonin and noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor, in human plasma using liquid chromatography with spectrofluorimetric detection

Milnacipran is an antidepressant drug belonging to the class of serotonin and noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors. A sensitive high performance liquid chromatographic during the development method coupled with a fluorimetric detection was set up, validated and then used routinely of the drug. After liquid-liquid extraction, milnacipran and its internal standard were analyzed by reversed-phase liquid chromatography (LC). The drug was derivatized with fluorescamine for fluorescence detection. The identity of the liquid chromatography peaks was controlled using mass spectrometry. The assay linearity was validated up to 1000 ng/ml. The limit of quantification was set at 5 ng/ml. Precision values (relative standard deviations) were lower than 5.4%, whereas the mean accuracy was higher than 95%. The extraction recoveries were higher than 70% for both milnacipran and the internal standard. In clinics, the LC-fluorescence method was routinely used to investigate the pharmacokinetics of milnacipran in patients and proved to be robust and capable of quantifying milnacipran in plasma for at least 36 h (four- to five-fold the elimination half-life).

Pharmacokinetic linearity of i.v. vinorelbine from an intra-patient dose escalation study design

As pharmacokinetics represents a bridge between pharmacological concentrations and clinical regimens, the pharmacokinetic exploration of the therapeutic dose range is a major outcome. This study was aimed at assessing pharmacokinetic linearity of i.v. vinorelbine through an open design with intra-patient dose escalation (3 doses/group). Three groups of six patients received either 20-25-30 mg/m2; or 25-30-35 mg/m2; or 30-35-40 mg/m2. The inclusion criteria were: histologically confirmed tumour with at least one assessable target lesion, age 25-75 years, WHO PS < or =2, normal haematology and biochemistry, life expectancy > or =3 months. The pharmacokinetics was evaluated in both whole blood and plasma over 120 h. Twenty-six patients were recruited and 18 were evaluable for pharmacokinetics. The toxicity consisted in grade < or =3 leucopenia and neutropenia (<20% of courses) and two grade 4 constipation with rapid recovery (2/54 courses). Compared to blood, plasma was demonstrated to underestimate the pharmacokinetic parameters. In blood, the drug total clearance was about 0.6 l/h/kg, with minor contribution of renal clearance, steady state volume of distribution close to 13 l/h/kg, and elimination half-life at about 40 h. A pharmacokinetic linearity was demonstrated up to 40 mg/m2, and even up to 45 mg/m2 when pooling data from another study. A pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationship was evidenced on leucopenia and neutropenia when pooling the data from the two studies.

Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer in Elderly Patients: Influence of Age on Vinorelbine Oral Pharmacokinetics

The majority of cancer-related deaths are attributed to lung carcinoma. Age increases this incidence, which is also likely associated with physiologic modifications that affect drug pharmacokinetics and metabolism. Therefore, knowledge of pharmacokinetics in elderly patients is one of the major factors in deciding whether or not to reduce the dose to prevent toxicity. This phase II study was aimed at evaluating the influence of age on oral vinorelbine pharmacokinetics in elderly patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Inclusion criteria were > 70 years of age; histologically or cytologically proven NSCLC; inoperable stage IIIB, IV, or delayed relapse of any stage becoming unresectable; Karnofsky performance status > 80%; and normal hematology and biochemistry. Blood-limited sampling at intervals of 1.5, 3, and 24 hours after dosing was performed during the first administration of oral vinorelbine at 60 mg/m2. Bayesian pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated through previously published nonlinear mixed-effect modeling (NONMEM), and compared with a reference population of 52 patients (age, 56 years 12) selected from vinorelbine pharmacokinetic database. There were 48 patients evaluable for pharmacokinetics out of the 52 elderly patients enrolled (age, 74 years 3). There was no difference between pharmacokinetic parameters, including the bioavailability factor evaluated by NONMEM, even without intravenous administration, and a similar interindividual variability (32%-33%) was observed between the 2 groups. Furthermore, no correlation between age (range, 31-82 years) and oral vinorelbine total clearance was observed in 100 patients pooled together. Therefore, no requirement for oral vinorelbine dose reduction was suggested from a pharmacokinetic standpoint.

Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of the new vinca alkaloid vinflunine administered as a 10-min infusion every 3 weeks in patients with advanced solid tumours

BACKGROUND

Vinflunine is a novel vinca alkaloid obtained by semi-synthesis using super-acidic chemistry to selectively introduce two fluorine atoms at the 20' position of vinorelbine. In human tumour xenografts, vinflunine showed definite antitumour activity in seven out of 11 tumours tested compared with three out of 11 for vinorelbine.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this phase I study, vinflunine was administered to 31 patients with advanced malignancies as a 10-min i.v. infusion every 3 weeks according to an escalating schedule of doses between 30 and 400 mg/m(2).

RESULTS

Pharmacokinetic parameters and toxicities were assessed and, at 400 mg/m(2), three out of five patients experienced dose-limiting toxicity. At the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), i.e. 400 mg/m(2), the toxicity profile of vinflunine consisted mainly of mucositis, constipation and neutropenia of short duration. Vinflunine area under the curve increased as a proportion of the administered dose whereas no saturation of elimination was observed.

CONCLUSION

The MTD of vinflunine was achieved at 400 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks. According to protocol rules, the recommended dose was established at 350 mg/m(2). A preliminary assessment of first patients included in early phase II trials led to reduction of the recommended dose to 320 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks for further development of vinflunine. Three partial responses (two in breast carcinoma, one in renal cell carcinoma) suggest that activity is likely to be seen in less heavily pretreated patient populations.

A simultaneous oral/intravenous population pharmacokinetic model for vinorelbine

OBJECTIVES

To develop a population pharmacokinetic (PK) model for simultaneous analysis of oral and intravenous data, to compare the variability between the two routes of administration of vinorelbine, to search for the main patient characteristics that explain this variability, and to estimate the mean population bioavailability of oral vinorelbine.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A PK model was developed from 175 phase I/II patients (419 courses) treated by intravenous (20-45 mg/m2) and/or oral (60-100 mg/m2) vinorelbine given as monotherapy. Oral and intravenous PK data were simultaneously fitted using the NONMEM program, allowing the estimation of oral PK parameters such as the bioavailability factor in patients who received only the oral formulation. Covariates included demographic characteristics, biological markers, hematological parameters, liver metastases, early vomiting, and food intake. The population covariate model was developed from rich sampling data ( n=187 phase I courses) and then assessed from sparse sampling data ( n=232 phase II courses).

RESULTS

A three-compartment model best described the combined oral/intravenous blood concentration-time data. The mean absolute bioavailability was 36%, with moderate interindividual (CV=20%) and intraindividual (CV=19%) variability. Bayesian clearance was accurately estimated in 180 of 187 patients. The clearance of oral and intravenous vinorelbine showed comparable variability at usual doses (25-30 mg/m2 intravenous; CV=26%; 60-80 mg/m2 oral, CV=33%) and was moderately increased when including maximum tolerated doses (20-45 mg/m2 intravenous, CV=27%; 60-100 mg/m2 oral, CV=36%). Several relevant covariate relationships influencing the total body clearance of vinorelbine were independent of the route of administration: body surface area (proportional relationship), platelet count above 400 x 10(9)/l (negative correlation), creatinine clearance (positive correlation), and elevated transaminases (negative correlation). Food intake induced a lag time in the absorption of oral vinorelbine. A weak and poorly estimated relationship was observed between elevated alkaline phosphatase levels and bioavailability, although hepatic markers such as GGT, LDH, total protein, and liver metastases and age had no effect on vinorelbine pharmacokinetics.

CONCLUSIONS

By means of the simultaneous analysis of oral and intravenous data the bioavailability (F=36%) and its associated variability were estimated. At usual doses similar levels of variability were observed between oral and intravenous routes. As a result of the identification of covariates from phase I data and their confirmation from phase II data further explorations based on limited sampling strategies are now possible. The use of a simultaneous oral/intravenous model allows a better characterization of the PK profile of vinorelbine after administration by either vascular or oral route

Pharmacology and pharmacokinetics of milnacipran

Milnacipran is a dual-action antidepressant drug with equivalent inhibitory action at noradrenaline and serotonin neuronal reuptake systems. This dual action has been demonstrated in vitro and in vivo in experimental animals, and ex vivo in man. Milnacipran has no relevant affinity for any neurotransmitter receptor studied, in particular postsynaptic adrenergic, muscarinic and histamine receptors, and is therefore expected to be devoid of the prominent side-effects of many earlier antidepressants. Studies in human volunteers have not demonstrated any impact of milnacipran on cognitive function, consistent with its lack of anticholinergic properties. These pharmacodynamic properties are well preserved in vivo in humans, because milnacipran is only metabolized to a limited extent, and therefore circulates in the body principally as the unchanged parent drug, which is the only pharmacologically active compound at clinical doses. The pharmacokinetic profile of milnacipran is characterized by rapid absorption, high bioavailability, low protein binding, and rapid elimination, both by hepatic glucuronidation and renal excretion. This gives milnacipran certain pharmacokinetic advantages, such as low inter-individual variation in plasma levels, low potential for drug interactions, and limited impact on hepatic cytochrome P450 systems. These pharmacokinetic properties differentiate milnacipran from most other antidepressant drugs and contribute to the good safety profile of milnacipran and allow it to be used simply and flexibly in clinical practice.

Population pharmacokinetics model and limited sampling strategy for intravenous vinorelbine derived from phase I clinical trials

AIMS

a) To characterize the pharmacokinetics of intravenous vinorelbine, b) to use a population analysis for the identification of patient covariates that might appreciably influence its disposition and c) to define a limited sampling strategy for further Bayesian estimation of individual pharmacokinetic parameters.

METHODS

All data were collected from 64 patients (99 courses) entered in three different phase I trials that have been previously reported. All patients received vinorelbine as a 20 min infusion with dose levels ranging from 20-45 mg m-2. The population pharmacokinetic model was built in a sequential manner on a subset of two-thirds of the data, starting with a covariate-free model then progressing to a covariate model using the nonlinear-mixed effect methodology. The remaining one-third of the data were used to validate several sparse sampling designs.

RESULTS

A linear three-compartment model characterized vinorelbine blood concentrations (n=1228). Two primary pharmacokinetic parameters (total clearance and volume of distribution) were related to various combinations of covariates. The relationship for total clearance (CLtotal (l h-1)=29.2xBSAx(1-0.0090 Plt)+6.7xWt/Crs) was dependent on the patient's body surface area (BSA), weight (Wt), serum creatinine (Crs) and platelet count before administration (Plt). The optimal limited sampling strategy consisted of a combination of three measured blood concentrations; the first immediately before the end of infusion or 20 min later, the second at either 1 h, 3 h or 6 h and the third at 24 h after drug administration.

CONCLUSIONS

A population pharmacokinetic model and a limited sampling strategy for intravenous vinorelbine have been developed. This is the first population analysis performed on the basis of a large phase I database that has identified clinical covariates influencing the disposition of i.v. vinorelbine. The model can be used to obtain accurate Bayesian estimates of pharmacokinetic parameters in situations where extensive pharmacokinetic sampling is not feasable.

Information tools for exploratory data analysis in population pharmacokinetics

For a group of individuals, population pharmacokinetic studies describe the interindividual variability through a statistical distribution. These studies conducted during the drug development serve as a useful marker of the safety of the drug, provide information that might be decisive for future experiments and, in a clinical context, help establish guidelines for optimal use in each patient. As complementary tools to the existing statistical and graphical techniques for population pharmacokinetic data analysis, indexes derived from information theory were used to select the most appropriate modelfor the statistical distribution, to detect atypical individuals, and to screen influential covariates. The rationale for using these indexes is shown using simulated and real data.

Oral vinorelbine pharmacokinetics and absolute bioavailability study in patients with solid tumors

BACKGROUND

Vinorelbine is a vinca alkaloid obtained by hemisynthesis, which makes the molecule more lipophilic than the other vincas. An injectable formulation is already marketed for the treatment of non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and advanced breast cancer (ABC). A new oral form has been developed and its file registration is being submitted. As part of its development, a clinical study was conducted to determine the absolute bioavailability and pharmacokinetics of oral vinorelbine administered as softgel capsules, and to evaluate its safety profile compared with intravenous administration.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty-two patients with solid tumours were included in the study. Patients fasted and were randomised to receive vinorelbine on day 1, either as a 20 minute intravenous (i.v.) infusion of 25 mg/m2 or as softgel capsules at a dose of 80 mg/m2. Patients were treated with the alternate route after a one week wash-out period. Blood and urine samples for pharmacokinetic analysis were collected during each vinorelbine administration. Safety was assessed after each administration using the CALGB/expanded CTC classification.

RESULTS

Twenty-four patients were eligible for pharmacokinetic evaluation. Oral vinorelbine was rapidly absorbed at 80 mg/m2 (Tmax 1.4 +/- 0.7 h) and showed a bioavailability of 43 +/- 14, and close to 40% based on AUC(last) and AUC(inf), respectively. A bioequivalence analysis was conducted on dosage-normalised blood exposures. Equivalence was demonstrated between 80 mg/m2 oral and 30 mg/m2 i.v., and between 60 mg/m2 oral and 25 mg/m2 i.v. The inter-individual variability was equivalent for both routes (CV: 38% and 39% for oral and i.v., respectively). A correlation was found in both methods between AUClast and % nadir variation in white blood cells (WBC) and polymorphonuclears (PMN). More cases of neutropenia (all grades pooled), leucopenia (grades 3-4 only) and nausea (grades 2-3) were induced by 80 mg/m2 oral vinorelbine than by 25 mg/m2 i.v. The greatest intensity of these effects, following oral administration, probably reflects the higher, observed drug exposure.

CONCLUSION

At therapeutic dosage levels, pharmacokinetic behaviour and safety profiles were similar for both routes. The absolute bioavailability of the oral vinorelbine (new, soft gelatine capsule) was close to 40%. Inter-individual variability in drug exposure was equivalent in both routes. The pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) relationship in haematological toxicity was independent of the routes of administration. Reliable, corresponding doses between oral and i.v. vinorelbine were established, which will result in bioequivalent AUC.

New sensitive liquid chromatography method coupled with tandem mass spectrometric detection for the clinical analysis of vinorelbine and its metabolites in blood, plasma, urine and faeces

A new sensitive and specific liquid chromatographic method coupled with tandem mass spectrometric detection was set up and validated for the simultaneous quantitation of vinorelbine, its main metabolite, 4-O-deacetylvinorelbine and two other minor metabolites, 20'-hydroxyvinorelbine and vinorelbine 6'-oxide. All these compounds, including vinblastine (used as internal standard) were deproteinised from blood, plasma and faeces (only diluted in urine), analysed on a cyano column and detected on a Micromass Quattro II system in the positive ion mode after ionisation, using an electrospray ion source. Under tandem mass spectrometry conditions, the specific product ions led one to accurately quantify vinorelbine and its metabolites in all biological fluids. In whole blood, linearity was assessed up to 200 ng/ml for vinorelbine and up to 50 ng/ml for the metabolites. The limit of quantitation was validated at 250 pg/ml for both vinorelbine and 4-O-deacetylvinorelbine. In the other biological media, the linearity was assessed within a same range and the limit of quantitation was adjusted according to the expected concentrations of each compound. This method was initially developed in order to identify the metabolite structures and to elucidate the metabolic pathway of vinorelbine. Thanks to its high sensitivity, this method has enabled the quantitation of vinorelbine and all its metabolites in whole blood over 168 h (i.e., 4-5 elimination half lives) whilst the previous liquid chromatographic methods allowed their measurement for a maximum of 48-72 h. Therefore, using this method has improved the reliability of the pharmacokinetic data analysis of vinorelbine.

Validated method for the determination of idazoxan in human plasma by liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometric detection

A liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method for the determination of idazoxan in human (heparin) plasma is presented, which was developed and validated using 500 microl of sample. Sample preparation consisted of the addition of fluoroidazoxan as the internal standard, extraction at alkaline conditions into tert.-butyl methyl ether, followed by centrifugation, evaporation of the solvent and reconstitution in methanol. After a short chromatographic run, detection took place by ionspray tandem mass spectrometry in positive ion mode. Validation results on linearity, specificity, accuracy, precision and stability, as well as application of the method to samples from a clinical trial, are shown. The validated calibration range is from 0.300 to 100 ng/ml, with accuracy (bias) and precision (coefficient of variation) being below 15% at all levels. A sample throughput of, typically, 150 per day can be achieved.

Which bioequivalence study for a racemic drug? Application to milnacipran

Milnacipran, a new non tricyclic antidepressant drug, is a racemic mixture (F2207) composed of two enantiomers: F2695 and F2696, both demonstrated to be active. A randomized open label, single-dose latin square study was undertaken in 24 healthy volunteers to compare, based on racemate data, the relative bioavailability of two new formulations to that of a reference formulation. Later on, as suggested by actual regulatory trend, analysis was carried out on enantiomer data, although in a supportive way. Bioequivalence was assessed on calculation of 90% confidence intervals for log-transformed Cmax and AUC(0-infinity) and on Wilcoxon test for Tmax with a 5% level of significance. Based on racemate data, both test formulations were demonstrated to be equivalent to the reference capsule in terms of Cmax and AUC-(0-infinity). Differences in Tmax reached statistical significance, although their mean magnitude was small, and probably not relevant when related to antidepressant long-term therapy. When considering the test capsule - reference capsule comparison, the equivalence demonstrated for the racemate reflect that of each enantiomer. On the contrary, equivalence between the test tablet and the reference capsule demonstrated for the racemate, is not supported by both enantiomers as Cmax of F2696 fails to reach bioequivalence criteria, making more uncertain the conclusion of bioequivalence. From this experience, it seems than when equivalence is demonstrated close to the limits for the racemate, it is difficult, especially for a low variability drug such as milnacipran, to comply with equivalence criteria for both enantiomers.

Pharmacokinetics of milnacipran in renal impairment

The pharmacokinetics of a single 50 mg dose of milnacipran, a new non tricyclic antidepressant drug, were compared in 8 chronic renal failure subjects (Clc(reat) between 9 to 84.5 ml.min(-1)) and in 6 healthy volunteers. Concentrations of unchanged (F2207 racemate and F2695 and F2696, enantiomers) and glucuroconjugated drug (main metabolite) were measured using HPLC and GC-MS. As for drugs mainly eliminated via renal route, the pharmacokinetics of milnacipran were markedly affected by impaired renal function with the elimination half-life of severely impaired subject being approximately three times that of the control group. Milnacipran apparent total clearance and renal clearance were positively correlated with glomerular filtration rate, while non-renal clearance and apparent volume of distribution were unaffected by renal impairment. Plasma concentrations of the glucuroconjugate were gradually increased in plasma, while its total urine excretion remained unchanged. As for the racemate, pharmacokinetics of each enantiomer were modified by renal failure, although, as predictable from its higher renal clearance value, it was more marked for F2696 than for F2695. Considering that modifications were shown to be proportional to the degree of renal impairment and that milnacipran presents low variability, the necessary dose adjustment is therefore easy to predict.

Pharmacokinetics of milnacipran in liver impairment

The pharmacokinetics of single 50 mg oral and intravenous doses of milnacipran, a new non tricyclic antidepressant drug, were compared in 11 chronic liver impaired (LI) subjects and in 6 control subjects. Hepatic impairments, classified according to the PUGH scale were moderate (1 grade A), intermediate (6 grade B) and severe (4 grade C). Concentrations of unchanged drug and its conjugated form (its main metabolite) were measured in plasma and urines. In control subjects, milnacipran present high absolute bioavailability (mean value of 90%). Around 50% of the dose are excreted in urines as unchanged, while around 14% are excreted as glucuroconjugate. The remaining is composed of free and conjugated phase I inactive metabolites. Administration of milnacipran in LI subjects results in non significant changes in its pharmacokinetics, although its variability is increased. Unchanged drug exposure is not modified in LI subjects, while plasma levels of the conjugate are slightly decreased compared to the control group. This could either be due to a slight reduction in the conjugation process, or to a change in the distribution of the drug as urine excretion of both unchanged and conjugated forms are not modified compared to the control group. A few LI subjects present supra-bioavailability resulting in higher drug exposure after oral administration than after intravenous infusion. These modifications are not clinically relevant as drug exposure of the parent drug is not modified. As the unchanged drug is the only compound responsible for the activity of milnacipran, no dosage adjustment is needed in patients presenting liver impairment.

Involvement of P-glycoprotein in an in vitro blood-brain barrier model

The P-glycoprotein (P-gp) multidrug transporter is present at the luminal face of the brain capillary endothelial cells that contribute to the blood-brain barrier. To study its role in transendothelial anticancer drug transport, we made use of a co-culture system formed of bovine brain capillary endothelial cells and astrocytes which allows the in vitro maintenance of specialized properties of the brain endothelial cells, including expression of P-gp as assessed by Northern and Western blot analyses. Vinblastine, an anticancer drug substrate for P-gp and known not to enter the brain, was found to be poorly transferred across the endothelial cell monolayer. This low vinblastine transport was however strongly increased in the presence of verapamil, a well known P-gp blocker. Moreover, verapamil was shown to increase the accumulation of the anticancer drug in the brain endothelial cells through inhibition of drug efflux. These results suggest that P-gp activity evidenced in the co-culture model is involved in the low transendothelial transport of vinblastine, thus supporting the conclusion that P-gp expressed at the blood-brain barrier level may prevent xenobiotics, including anticancer drugs, from entering the central nervous system.

Pharmacokinetics of milnacipran in comparison with other antidepressants

Despite the large number of antidepressants currently available, it is still necessary to develop new drugs that combine the efficacy of the older antidepressant with improved safety, tolerability and therapeutic profile that will allow them to be used in depressed patients who are elderly or with cardiac, renal or hepatic disease. This article reviews the pharmacokinetic characteristics of the tricyclic antidepressants, the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and more recently introduced antidepressants such as venlafaxine and nefazodone. Milnacipran (Ixel), a novel drug, combines antidepressant efficacy with some unique pharmacokinetic features. A summary of its pharmacokinetic profile shows that milnacipran has a high bioavailability, low plasma protein binding and that it is largely eliminated in the urine as parent drug or as a glucuronide. These features suggest that the likelihood of interactions with other drugs given concurrently is lower than would occur with most second generation antidepressants and the tricyclic antidepressants. Furthermore, studies in patients with liver dysfunction, and in the elderly, suggest that dose adjustment is not necessary when milnacipran is administered to these patients. The decrease in milnacipran elimination is correlated to the degree of renal impairment, allowing adjustment of schedules. In comparison to earlier antidepressants, milnacipran combines efficacy and a relatively low side-effect profile with the added advantage of fewer interactions with drugs that may be given concurrently.

Acute electrophysiological effects of intravenous milnacipran, a new antidepressant agent

Milnacipran is a new antidepressant agent selected from a series of cycloproprane derivatives. The aim of this study was to investigate the acute electrophysiological effects and the tolerance of intravenous administration of this drug in 10 patients without any abnormality as shown in an electrophysiological study done for various complaints. Milnacipran was given over a 30-min period at doses of 0.2 mg/kg (2 patients), 0.4 mg/kg (2 patients) and 0.8 mg/kg (6 patients). The most significant alterations observed in this study were increases in heart rate (average of maximal increase: +19.5% at 50 min, P = 0.06) and systolic blood pressure (average of maximal increase: +21.5% at 10 min, P < 0.005), and decreases in the functional refractory period of the atrium (-3%, P < 0.05), the atrioventricular node (-9%, P < 0.005) and the effective refractory period of the right ventricle (-10.8%, P < 0.05) at 50 min. The sinus node function was improved in nine patients but depressed in one patient with previous slight baseline sinus node alterations. Milnacipran being devoid of both anticholinergic and monoamine oxidase inhibition activities, these alterations could be related to inhibition of noradrenaline uptake leading to an increase of adrenergic activities. No other ECG or electrophysiological parameters were significantly altered. Five of the 10 patients reported transient nausea, four of them for the highest dosage (0.8 mg/kg) and at the moment of peak of milnacipran plasma level. In conclusion, electrophysiological effects of intravenous milnacipran are negligible. These findings differ from those, well described in the literature, for imipramine-like antidepressant agents.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Effects of prolonged administration of milnacipran, a new antidepressant, on receptors and monoamine uptake in the brain of the rat

Most antidepressants produce changes in monoamine receptors in brain after chronic administration in animals. The most commonly described alterations are a decreased density and function of beta-adrenergic receptors and have been postulated to be the mechanisms by which antidepressants exert their therapeutic effect. Milnacipran (previous name midalcipran) is a new, clinically-effective antidepressant, which inhibits the uptake of both serotonin and noradrenaline but has no affinity for any pre- or postsynaptic receptor studied. When given either orally at 7.5 mg/kg twice daily for 3 days, at 30 mg/kg once daily for 3 weeks, by osmotic mini-pump at 30 mg/kg/day for 27 days, or in drinking water at approximately 15 mg/kg/day for 6 weeks and after a washout period of 24 hr, milnacipran produced no down-regulation of beta-adrenoceptors. In addition, there were no alterations of alpha 1- or alpha 2-adrenoceptors, 5-HT1, 5-HT2 receptors or benzodiazepine binding sites. Moreover, uptake and accumulation of serotonin and noradrenaline were unmodified. In addition, the potency for milnacipran to inhibit monoamine uptake in vitro in the cortex was not altered in treated rats, compared to control animals. Thus, in spite of its action on both the uptake of serotonin and noradrenaline, milnacipran appears to be without long-term action on beta-adrenoceptors or the other receptors studied, suggesting that, at least for this antidepressant, these modifications are not essential for clinical activity.

Monoamine uptake inhibition by plasma from healthy volunteers after single oral doses of the antidepressant milnacipran

In a placebo-controlled double-blind cross-over study, we gave 12 healthy male volunteers placebo or milnacipran orally, such that each volunteer received placebo and two doses of milnacipran. Blood samples taken before and at various times after dosing were analysed for plasma concentrations of unchanged milnacipran and the inhibitory effect of the plasma on the uptake of 3H-5-hydroxytryptamine (5HT) into normal human platelets or of 3H-noradrenaline into rat hypothalamus homogenate. The mean maximal inhibition of 5HT and noradrenaline uptake was correlated with drug dose. The inhibition of 5HT uptake was correlated with the inhibition of noradrenaline uptake and both were correlated with plasma concentration of unchanged drug at all times and doses tested. Thus, milnacipran, when given orally to man, circulates in a biologically active form with similar potency for the inhibition of 5HT and noradrenaline uptake.

Differences in the metabolism of epicainide in rats and man

1. Epicainide is a new potent antiarrhythmic agent, metabolized differently in rats and man. 2. In rats, the aromatic part of the molecule (the two phenyl rings linked to the quaternary carbon atom) undergoes metabolic attack by the mono-oxygenases. The hydroxy and methoxy-hydroxy metabolites are predominant and are excreted in urine and bile both as free and conjugated forms. 3. In contrast, the aromatic moiety of epicainide remains unchanged in man. It is the ethylpyrrolidine ring which is mainly attacked, resulting in the expected N-deethylation, subsequent oxidation of the pyrrolidine moiety, and reduction or hydrolysis of the amide function. 4. A preliminary kinetic analysis of epicainide in man reveals a linear open 2-compartment model. The radioactivity recoveries confirm the absence of any accumulation of the drug in the organism.