P-glycoprotein mediates the pharmacokinetic interaction of olanzapine with fluoxetine in rats

Clinical trials of olanzapine combined with fluoxetine (Olanzapine/Fluoxetine Combination, OFC) in the treatment of refractory depression have shown significant efficacy, but the drug-drug interaction (DDI) between them remains unclear. In this report, the pharmacokinetic interaction between olanzapine and fluoxetine was studied in wild-type (WT) and Mdr1a/b gene knockout (KO) rats. By analyzing the pharmacokinetics and tissue distribution of olanzapine in single dose and combination, the potential DDI mediated by P-gp was explored. The results showed that in WT rats, the combination of fluoxetine increased the peak concentration (Cmax, 44.1 ± 5.1 ng/mL in the combination group vs 9.0 ± 1.5 ng/mL in the monotherapy group) and the exposure (AUC0-t, 235.8 ± 22.7 h × ng/mL in the combination group vs 47.5 ± 8.4 h × ng/mL in monotherapy group) of olanzapine, and decreased the clearance (CL, 8119.0 ± 677.9 mL/h/kg in the combination group vs 49,469.0 ± 10,306.0 mL/h/kg in monotherapy group). At the same time, fluoxetine significantly increased the in vivo exposure of olanzapine in brain, liver, kidney and ileum of WT rats, indicating the occurrence of DDI. The same phenomenon was observed in Caco-2 cells in vitro as well. However, in KO rats, there was no significant difference in pharmacokinetic parameters between the monotherapy group and the combination group. In conclusion, P-gp plays an important role in the pharmacokinetic interaction between olanzapine and fluoxetine in rats. This study may provide a reference for the clinical safety of olanzapine combined with fluoxetine.

Effects of CYP2D6 Genotypes on Venlafaxine Metabolism in Japanese Psychiatric Patients With Depression

BACKGROUND

Venlafaxine (VEN) is primarily metabolized by CYP2D6. Although several studies have reported the significant effects of CYP2D6 on VEN and O-desmethylvenlafaxine (ODV) pharmacokinetics in Whites, limited data are available regarding the effects of the Asian-specific CYP2D6 genotype on VEN metabolism. This study evaluated the effects of the CYP2D6*10 and CYP2D6*5 genotypes on the steady-state plasma concentrations of VEN and ODV in Japanese patients.

METHODS

This study included 75 Japanese patients with depression who were treated with VEN. Steady-state plasma concentrations of VEN and ODV were measured using liquid chromatography. Polymerase chain reaction was used to determine CYP2D6 genotypes. A stepwise multiple regression analysis was performed to analyze the relationship between independent variables (sex, age, smoking habit, and number of mutated alleles, CYP2D6*10 and CYP2D6*5), subject-dependent variables (plasma concentrations of VEN and ODV [all corrected for dose and body weight]), and the ODV/VEN ratio.

RESULTS

Significant correlations were observed between the daily dose of VEN (corrected for body weight) and plasma concentrations of VEN (r = 0.498, P < 0.001) and ODV (r = 0.380, P = 0.001); ODV plasma concentrations were approximately 3.2 times higher than VEN plasma concentrations (VEN versus ODV = 18.60 ng/mL versus 59.10 ng/mL). VEN plasma concentrations (corrected for dose and body weight) did not differ with differing numbers of CYP2D6-mutated alleles. However, the ODV/VEN ratio decreased as the number of mutated CYP2D6 alleles increased (P = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study to examine the effects of CYP2D6*10 in a clinical setting. Although no effects on the plasma concentrations of VEN or ODV were observed, CYP2D6 polymorphism affects the ODV/VEN ratio. Further studies are needed to confirm the clinical relevance of these findings.

A randomized placebo-controlled trial of bupropion for Cancer-related fatigue: Study design and procedures

BACKGROUND

Cancer-related fatigue is a significant problem and is associated with poor quality of life. Behavioral interventions include exercise and cognitive-behavioral therapy, which survivors may be unwilling or unable to adopt. Pharmacologic interventions (e.g., selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors) have been disappointing. One potential therapy is the antidepressant bupropion, a norepinephrine-dopamine reuptake inhibitor that targets both inflammation and the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis. The current study is intended to provide a rigorous test of the efficacy and tolerability of bupropion for cancer-related fatigue.

METHODS

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial will examine the effects of bupropion on cancer-related fatigue. The trial will be conducted nationwide through the University of Rochester Medical Center (URMC) National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP). Disease-free breast cancer survivors (n = 422) who completed chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy 12-60 months previously and report significant fatigue will be randomized 1:1 to receive bupropion (300 mg/day) or placebo. Outcomes will be assessed at baseline and the 12-week follow-up. The primary outcome, fatigue, will be measured with the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Fatigue (FACIT-F). Secondary outcomes include quality of life, depression, and drug tolerability. Exploratory outcomes include cognition and symptomatology. Potential biological mechanisms and genetic moderators of cancer-related fatigue will also be explored.

DISCUSSION

This study is the first placebo-controlled trial to our knowledge to evaluate bupropion for cancer-related fatigue. Positive results could revolutionize the treatment of cancer-related fatigue, as bupropion is safe, inexpensive, widely-available, and may be more tolerable and acceptable for many patients than current, limited treatment options.

Pharmacokinetic Pharmacogenetic Prescribing Guidelines for Antidepressants: A Template for Psychiatric Precision Medicine

Antidepressants are commonly prescribed medications in the United States, and there is increasing interest in individualizing treatment selection for more than 20 US Food and Drug Administration-approved treatments for major depressive disorder. Providing greater precision to pharmacotherapeutic recommendations for individual patients beyond the large-scale clinical trials evidence base can potentially reduce adverse effect toxicity profiles and increase response rates and overall effectiveness. It is increasingly recognized that genetic variation may contribute to this differential risk to benefit ratio and thus provides a unique opportunity to develop pharmacogenetic guidelines for psychiatry. Key studies and concepts that review the rationale for cytochrome P450 2D6 (CYP2D6) and cytochrome P450 2C19 (CYP2C19) genetic testing can be delineated by serum levels, adverse events, and clinical outcome measures (eg, antidepressant response). In this article, we report the evidence that contributed to the implementation of pharmacokinetic pharmacogenetic guidelines for antidepressants primarily metabolized by CYP2D6 and CYP2C19.

Randomised clinical trial on the effect of a single oral administration of l-tryptophan, at three dose rates, on reaction speed, plasma concentration and haemolysis in horses

Tryptophan (TRP) is marketed as a calmative for horses despite reservations about its efficacy. The aim of this study was to measure the effect of oral TRP administration on the reaction speed of horses. Sixty mature horses were used in a two stage randomised, blind, cross-over study, receiving a placebo and an oral dose of TRP (30, 60 or 120 mg/kg body weight), before undergoing a reaction speed test. Blood samples were taken up to 96 h after TRP administration, to identify signs of acute haemolytic anaemia. Plasma TRP concentrations were increased (P <0.001) by the administration of TRP paste. However, TRP had no effect on the reaction speed of horses when startled. There was no evidence of alterations in clinical pathology parameters in 432 blood samples. While the safety of these doses of TRP can be confirmed, there was no evidence to suggest that a single dose of TRP is an effective calmative for horses.

Intranasal delivery of paroxetine nanoemulsion via the olfactory region for the management of depression: formulation, behavioural and biochemical estimation

Paroxetine is a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) and is used for the treatment of depression and anxiety problems, but suffers from the drawback of poor oral bioavailability (less than 50%) due to its extensive first pass metabolism. The objective of the present study was to develop a paroxetine loaded nanoemulsion (o/w type) for direct nose-to-brain delivery. Nanoemulsions were prepared by the spontaneous emulsification technique using Capmul MCM, Solutol HS 15 and propylene glycol as oil phase, surfactant and co-surfactant, respectively, for delivery of drug directly to the brain through the nasal route for better management of depression. Formulations were studied for droplet size, polydispersity index (PDI), percentage transmittance, refractive index, viscosity, zeta potential, surface morphology and in vitro permeation study. TEM images of optimized formulation showed spherical droplets with a mean diameter of 58.47 ± 3.02 nm, PDI of 0.339 ± 0.007 and zeta potential values of -33 mV. The formulation showed good results for transmittance (100.60 ± 0.577%), refractive index (1.412 ± 0.003) and viscosity (40.85 ± 6.40 cP). Permeation studies revealed a 2.57-fold enhancement in permeation as compared to the paroxetine suspension. Behavioural studies such as the forced swimming test and locomotor activity test were done on Wistar rats to study the antidepressant effect of the optimized formulation. Treatment of depressed rats with paroxetine nanoemulsion (administered intranasally) significantly improved the behavioural activities in comparison to paroxetine suspension (orally administered). Biochemical estimation results revealed that the prepared nanoemulsion was effective in enhancing the depressed levels of glutathione and decreasing the elevated levels of TBARS.

Clinical drug-drug interactions: focus on venlafaxine

Venlafaxine (VEN) is an antidepressant agent widely used nowadays as an alternative to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), particularly for the treatment of SSRI-resistant depression. As the co-administration of antidepressant drugs with other medications is very common in clinical practice, the potential risk for pharmacokinetic and/or pharmacodynamic drug interactions that may be clinically meaningful increases. Bearing in mind that VEN has exhibited large variability in antidepressant response, besides the individual genetic background, several other factors may contribute to those variable clinical outcomes, such as the occurrence of significant drug-drug interactions. Indeed, the presence of drug interactions is possibly one of the major reasons for interindividual variability, and their anticipation should be considered in conjugation with other specific patients' characteristics to optimize the antidepressant therapy. Hence, a comprehensive overview of the pharmacokinetic- and pharmacodynamic-based drug interactions involving VEN is herein provided, particularly addressing their clinical relevance.

Pharmacokinetics of fluoxetine in pregnant baboons (Papio spp.)

Fluoxetine is used to treat a number of psychiatric conditions in humans and behavioral problems in animals. Its use in pregnancy must balance maternal benefit with potential risk to the fetus. Knowledge of adult and fetal drug disposition can assist clinicians in selecting therapy that minimizes adverse effects to the fetus. Nonhuman primate models are used frequently in drug dose-translation studies, and pregnancy in baboons has many similarities to human pregnancy. Accordingly, pharmacokinetic analysis of a series of fluoxetine and norfluoxetine administrations to pregnant baboons was performed. The mean maternal baboon steady-state clearance of fluoxetine (42 mL/min/kg) was considerably higher than that in humans. Norfluoxetine, the major active metabolite, had a higher metabolite-to-drug ratio (8.7) than that found in humans, particularly with oral dosing. These results are consistent with more extensive metabolism in baboons than in humans and leads to a higher clearance than would be expected from allometric scaling. Fetal-to-maternal fluoxetine and norfluoxetine ratios under steady-state conditions were similar to those in humans, with fetal concentrations of fluoxetine 42% and norfluoxetine 47% of maternal concentrations. The fetal clearance of fluoxetine (303 ± 176 mL/min) and norfluoxetine (450 mL/min) exceeded reported placental blood flow. Understanding these species-associated differences in metabolism is a prerequisite to extrapolating data between species. Nonetheless, nonhuman primates are likely to remain valuable models for pharmacokinetic studies during pregnancy, particularly those directed toward fetal neurodevelopmental effects. Our results also are applicable to determining appropriate dosing of nonhuman primates in clinical settings.

Quantitative cross-species extrapolation between humans and fish: the case of the anti-depressant fluoxetine

Fish are an important model for the pharmacological and toxicological characterization of human pharmaceuticals in drug discovery, drug safety assessment and environmental toxicology. However, do fish respond to pharmaceuticals as humans do? To address this question, we provide a novel quantitative cross-species extrapolation approach (qCSE) based on the hypothesis that similar plasma concentrations of pharmaceuticals cause comparable target-mediated effects in both humans and fish at similar level of biological organization (Read-Across Hypothesis). To validate this hypothesis, the behavioural effects of the anti-depressant drug fluoxetine on the fish model fathead minnow (Pimephales promelas) were used as test case. Fish were exposed for 28 days to a range of measured water concentrations of fluoxetine (0.1, 1.0, 8.0, 16, 32, 64 µg/L) to produce plasma concentrations below, equal and above the range of Human Therapeutic Plasma Concentrations (H_TPCs). Fluoxetine and its metabolite, norfluoxetine, were quantified in the plasma of individual fish and linked to behavioural anxiety-related endpoints. The minimum drug plasma concentrations that elicited anxiolytic responses in fish were above the upper value of the H_TPC range, whereas no effects were observed at plasma concentrations below the H_TPCs. In vivo metabolism of fluoxetine in humans and fish was similar, and displayed bi-phasic concentration-dependent kinetics driven by the auto-inhibitory dynamics and saturation of the enzymes that convert fluoxetine into norfluoxetine. The sensitivity of fish to fluoxetine was not so dissimilar from that of patients affected by general anxiety disorders. These results represent the first direct evidence of measured internal dose response effect of a pharmaceutical in fish, hence validating the Read-Across hypothesis applied to fluoxetine. Overall, this study demonstrates that the qCSE approach, anchored to internal drug concentrations, is a powerful tool to guide the assessment of the sensitivity of fish to pharmaceuticals, and strengthens the translational power of the cross-species extrapolation.

A comparative review of escitalopram, paroxetine, and sertraline: Are they all alike?

It is known that newer antidepressants, such as the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), provide advantages in tolerability over antidepressants such as the tricyclics. However, even within the SSRI class, differences in efficacy or tolerability exist between the individual drugs. Among the three most widely prescribed SSRIs are paroxetine, sertraline, and escitalopram. Escitalopram is commonly referred to as an SSRI, but also has well-documented allosteric properties, and thus can be further classed as an allosteric serotonin reuptake inhibitor. All three antidepressants are efficacious compared with placebo, but there is evidence that escitalopram is more effective than a range of other antidepressants. There are no direct data to regard either paroxetine or sertraline as a superior antidepressant. Escitalopram is superior compared with paroxetine, which has a less favorable tolerability profile. Paroxetine is associated with cholinergic muscarinic antagonism and potent inhibition of CYP2D6, and sertraline has moderate drug interaction issues in comparison with escitalopram. Overall, as an allosteric serotonin reuptake inhibitor that is somewhat different from classical SSRIs, escitalopram is the first choice judged by combined efficacy and tolerability, and nonclinical data have offered possible mechanisms through which escitalopram could be more efficacious, based on its interaction with orthosteric and allosteric binding sites at the serotonin transporter.

[Sexual dysfunction associated with antidepressant agents]

Sexual dysfunction is a common adverse effect of antidepressant treatment and a main reason for non-compliance with treatment. Different antidepressant agents are associated with different degrees of dysfunction, which is thought to depend on the agent's pharmacological profile. Agents with serotonergic activity, such as selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI) and venlafaxine, yield the highest rate of sexual dysfunction. Non-SSRI agents such as duloxetine, reboxetine and mirtazapine have fewer sexual side effects than SSRI and venlafaxine. Agomelatine and bupropion are similar to placebo.

Common genetic variation and antidepressant efficacy in major depressive disorder: a meta-analysis of three genome-wide pharmacogenetic studies

OBJECTIVE

Indirect evidence suggests that common genetic variation contributes to individual differences in antidepressant efficacy among individuals with major depressive disorder, but previous studies may have been underpowered to detect these effects.

METHOD

A meta-analysis was performed on data from three genome-wide pharmacogenetic studies (the Genome-Based Therapeutic Drugs for Depression [GENDEP] project, the Munich Antidepressant Response Signature [MARS] project, and the Sequenced Treatment Alternatives to Relieve Depression [STAR*D] study), which included 2,256 individuals of Northern European descent with major depressive disorder, and antidepressant treatment outcomes were prospectively collected. After imputation, 1.2 million single-nucleotide polymorphisms were tested, capturing common variation for association with symptomatic improvement and remission after up to 12 weeks of antidepressant treatment.

RESULTS

No individual association met a genome-wide threshold for statistical significance in the primary analyses. A polygenic score derived from a meta-analysis of GENDEP and MARS participants accounted for up to approximately 1.2% of the variance in outcomes in STAR*D, suggesting a weakly concordant signal distributed over many polymorphisms. An analysis restricted to 1,354 individuals treated with citalopram (STAR*D) or escitalopram (GENDEP) identified an intergenic region on chromosome 5 associated with early improvement after 2 weeks of treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite increased statistical power accorded by meta-analysis, the authors identified no reliable predictors of antidepressant treatment outcome, although they did identify modest, direct evidence that common genetic variation contributes to individual differences in antidepressant response.

Effects of fluoxetine on the anticonvulsant action of valproate and ethosuximide in mouse model of myoclonic convulsions

Depression is becoming a growing problem in rural areas. This psychiatric disorder often accompanies epilepsy. The aim of this study was to assess the influence of fluoxetine (FXT), a commonly used antidepressant, on the protective action of two conventional antiepileptic drugs: ethosuximide (ETX) and valproate (VPA), against pentylenetetrazole (PTZ)-induced convulsions in mice. Motor coordination and long-term memory deficits induced by FXT, antiepileptic drugs alone and in combinations with FXT were assessed in the chimney test and passive-avoidance task, respectively. Brain concentrations of ETX and VPA were measured by immunofluorescence. Obtained results indicate that FXT at the dose of 15 mg/kg (i.p., 30 min before the test) significantly increased the threshold for clonic convulsions. The antidepressant drug at lower doses remained ineffective in this respect. Moreover, FXT at the highest subprotective dose (10 mg/kg, i.p.) markedly enhanced the anticonvulsant effects of VPA, but not of ETX, against PTZ-induced seizures. The interaction between FXT and VPA seems to be pharmacodynamic because the antidepressant drug did not alter the brain concentration of VPA. With regard to adverse effects, FXT, VPA, ETX, and the combinations of FXT with antiepileptic drugs, did not impair motor coordination and long-term memory in mice. In conclusion, the combination of FXT with VPA may be advantageous in the treatment of myoclonic epilepsy, and therefore it should be recommended for further study in clinical conditions.

Deficiencies of the FDA in evaluating generic formulations: addressing narrow therapeutic index drugs

Generic drugs represent a significant portion of the medical arsenal in treating disease. As copies of originator drugs, these drugs have been permitted abbreviated approval under the Hatch-Waxman Act. Yet with the current cost focus upon generic formulations, potential safety issues with generics have arisen. Although there is an established criterion of "bioequivalence" that generic formulations must demonstrate, narrow-therapeutic index drugs for sensitive clinical circumstances such as epilepsy, antiplatelet therapies, and mental health treatments may require different regulatory treatment than other generic drugs. Further, in these circumstances, differences in generic formulations may lead to adverse clinical outcomes due to less stringent bioequivalence tolerances. Yet there is no mandate for comparison between different generic formulations. Countries outside the United States advocate for narrowing tolerance ranges for these high risk health situations and the drugs for their treatment. We argue in this paper that additional patient safety matters must be taken into account for narrow therapeutic disease drugs, and regulatory bodies should emphasize greater tightness in bioequivalence before these narrow-therapeutic drug generic formulations are approved.

Determination of bupropion and its main metabolite in rat plasma by LC-MS and its application to pharmacokinetics

A sensitive and selective liquid chromatograpy-mass spectrometry method for the determination of bupropion and its main metabolite, hydroxubupropion, in rat plasma was developed and validated. After addition of carbamazepine as internal standard (IS) and precipitation of protein with acetonitrile, the plasma samples were analyzed on an Agilent Zorbax SB-C18 (2.1 mm x 50 mm, 3.5 microm) column at 30 degrees C, with acetonitrile-0.1% formic acid as mobile phase at a flow rate of 0.4 mL min(-1). The detection was carried out in the selective ion monitoring mode with a positive electrospray ionization interface. The calibration curve was linear over the 10-2000 ng mL(-1) for bupropion and 5-1000 ng mL(-1) for hydroxybupropion in plasma. RSD of inter-day and intra-day precision was less than 7% for bupropion, 9% for hydroxybupropion. The developed method was successfully applied to pharmacokinetic studies after single intragastric administration of bupropion 15 mg kg(-1) to rats.

Assessing a therapeutic exchange protocol for second-generation antidepressants: clinical results

OBJECTIVE

To design a therapeutic exchange protocol for antidepressants and clinically assess variables, such as: compliance level, frequency of cases with clinically significant increase on the Udvalg-für-Kliniske-Undersogelser (UKU) psychopharmacological scale, adverse effects analysis, overall analysis of UKU rating development and patients' level of acceptance. Secondary objectives were to correlate psychopharmacological treatment aspects with the pharmacological morbidity level, and evaluate the clinical impact of pharmacotherapeutic optimisation measures.

METHOD

The protocol is designed in accordance with a bibliographical review, which was approved by the Pharmacy and Therapeutics Commission. Sequential study was carried out with a sample of 30 patients. Three measurements were taken (base line, at 48-72 hours and at 1-3 weeks) to calculate the pharmacotherapeutic morbidity with the UKU rating scale and the Global Clinical Impression. Pharmacotherapeutic optimisation measures were used for those patients with high pharmacotherapeutic morbidity levels.

RESULTS

The compliance level was 73.3%. One patient experienced ≥25% increase on the UKU rating scale and another patient suffered from an adverse effect. The final UKU rating reached statistical significance compared with the measurements taken at 48-72 hours (P=.032) and with the base line measurement (P=.007). Patient acceptance was 90%. The impact of optimisation measurements on the pharmacotherapeutic morbidity level was clinically and statistically significant (P<.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The proposed protocol has been widely accepted and it is quite certain that it is to be introduced in at a general hospital level.

Extended-release trazodone (Oleptro) for depression

The FDA has approved the marketing of an extended-release formulation of trazodone (Oleptro--Angelini Labopharm) for treatment of major depressive disorder in adults. Immediate-release trazodone has been available for treatment of depression for many years, but is used mostly in low doses for its sedating effects.

Unsuspected poor metabolizer phenotypes of fluoxetine in bioavailability/bioequivalence studies from an indian population perspective. Retrospective pharmacokinetic data evaluation

BACKGROUND

Fluoxetine, belonging to the class of selective serotonin uptake inhibitors, has been extensively used for the treatment of depression and other psychiatry related disorders. Fluoxetine (CAS 59333-67-4) is a substrate of polymorphic cytochrome P450 2D6 isozyme (CYP2D6) leading to the formation of norfluoxetine (CAS 83891-03-06), which is not only active but long lived than the parent in the systemic circulation. Since the parent and metabolite levels are important from a therapeutic perspective, knowledge of phenotypic distribution of the population may be an important consideration.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the work was to retrospectively evaluate the pharmacokinetic data of fluoxetine and norfluoxetine from several bioavailability/bioequivalence (BA/BE) studies to identify the poor metabolizer (PM) phenotypes from the unsuspected healthy subjects across varied protocol designs, dose sizes and differing formulations.

METHODS

The pharmacokinetic data of fluoxetine and norfluoxetine were gathered from several BA/BE studies conducted at clinical facilities located at Bangalore and Chennai, India. The BA/BE studies involved open label, two-way randomized crossover designs with two periods and two treatments (reference and test). Blood samples were collected for at least 672 h after fluoxetine dosing and the plasma was analyzed using validated tandem liquid chromatography mass spectrometric assay to determine fluoxetine and norfluoxetine levels. Standard pharmacokinetic parameters were computed using noncompartmental methods. For the purpose of this paper, retrospective evaluation of pharmnacokinetic data from only the reference formulation was considered. The AUC ratio of fluoxetine/norfluoxetine was computed. The individual fluoxetine/norfluoxetine AUC(0-infinity), ratios were plotted in increasing rank order and using outlier test ('T' procedure at 5% level of significance) the subjects were categorized as extensive metabolizer (EM) and PM phenotypes. The unequivocal confirmation of PM phenotypes was obtained by performing linear regression analysis of fluoxetine vs norfluoxetine AUC(0-infinity) values.

RESULTS

Each study was evaluated for the distribution of EM and PM phenotypes of fluoxetine. There were 144 subjects evaluable from four studies, 89.6% (129 out of 144) of which could be categorised as EMs and 10.4% (15 out of 144) as PMs of fluoxetine. The pharmacokinetic parameters were quite distinct between the two phenotypes: (1) PM phenotypes showed much higher exposure (approximately 2.3-fold increase in AUC(0-infinity) and much slower elimination (almost 2-fold increase in elimination half-life) for fluoxetine as compared to EM phenotypes; (2) PM phenotypes showed approximately 0.5-fold lower exposure of norfluoxetine as compared to the EM counter parts; (3) There was no change (approximately 1.2-fold) in the elimination half life of norfluoxetine in EM and PM phenotypes.

CONCLUSIONS

Retrospective evaluation of fluoxetine and norfluoxetine pharmacokinetic data demonstrated existence of both PM and EM phenotypes in the Indian population. Based on the overall data (n=144 subjects) there appeared to be 10.4% of PM phenotypes for fluoxetine and/or possibly for other polymorphic CYP2D6 substrates commonly used in this region.

Effect of age, weight, and CYP2C19 genotype on escitalopram exposure

The purpose of this study was to characterize escitalopram population pharmacokinetics (PK) in patients treated for major depression in a cross-national, US-Italian clinical trial. Data from the 2 sites participating in this trial, conducted at Pittsburgh (United States) and Pisa (Italy), were used. Patients received 5, 10, 15, or 20 mg of escitalopram daily for a minimum of 32 weeks. Nonlinear mixed effects modeling was used to model the PK characteristics of escitalopram. One- and 2-compartment models with various random effect implementations were evaluated during model development. Objective function values and goodness-of-fit plots were used as model selection criteria. CYP2C19 genotype, age, weight, body mass index, sex, race, and clinical site were evaluated as possible covariates. In total, 320 plasma concentrations from 105 Pittsburgh patients and 153 plasma concentrations from 67 Pisa patients were available for the PK model development. A 1-compartmental model with linear elimination and proportional error best described the data. Apparent clearance (CL/F) and volume of distribution (V/F) for escitalopram without including any covariates in the patient population were 23.5 L/h and 884 L, respectively. CYP2C19 genotype, weight, and age had a significant effect on CL/F, and patient body mass index affected estimated V/F. Patients from Pisa, Italy, had significantly lower clearances than patients from Pittsburgh that disappeared after controlling for patient CYP2C19 genotype, age, and weight. Postprocessed individual empirical Bayes estimates on clearance for the 172 patients show that patients without allele CYP2C19(*)2 or (*)3 (n = 82) cleared escitalopram 33.7% faster than patients with heterogeneous or homogeneous (*)2 or (*)3 ((*)17/(*)2, (*)17/(*)3, (*)1/(*)2, (*)1/(*)3, (*)2/(*)2, (*)2/(*)3, and (*)3/(*)3, n = 46). CL/F significantly decreased with increasing patient age. Patients younger than 30 years (n = 45) cleared escitalopram 20.7% and 42.7% faster than patients aged 30 to 50 years (n = 84) and older than 50 years of age (n = 43), respectively. CYP2C19 genotype, age, and weight strongly influenced the CL/F of escitalopram. These variables may affect patient tolerance of this antidepressant and may provide important information in the effort to tailor treatments to patients' individual needs.

A simple method to monitor serum concentrations of fluoxetine and its major metabolite for pharmacokinetic studies

A rapid, selective and sensitive isocratic reversed-phase HPLC assay coupled with MS/MS detection for simultaneous quantification of fluoxetine and its major active metabolite in serum samples has been developed. Analytes were extracted with a simple three step liquid-liquid procedure and chromatographic separation was achieved on a C18 column. Because of its sensitivity, this HPLC/MS/MS method is suitable both for routine therapeutic drug monitoring and for pharmacokinetic studies, due to its low limits of quantification.

[Determination of plasma escitalopram with liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry]

OBJECTIVE

To establish an liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS)-based method for determining escitalopram in human plasma.

METHODS

A liquid-liquid ether extraction approach was adopted using dextromethorphan as the internal standard. The Agilent ZORBAX SB-C18 (3.5 microm,2.1 x 150 mm) was used as the analytical column with acetonitrile-NH4AC buffer (70:30, V/V) as the mobile phase at the flow rate of 0.3 ml/min. The sample was ionized by electrospray ionization source in the triple quadruple tandem mass spectrometer, and the plasma escitalopram determined with a multiple reaction monitoring mode of m/z325.4-->109.4.

RESULTS

The linear range was 0.0866-64.13 microg/L (r=0.9965) for escitalopram in human plasma, with the absolute recovery between 64.98% and 78.72% and the within-day and between-day deviations less than 10%.

CONCLUSION

The method is sensitive, accurate, rapid, specific and well applicable for clinical pharmacokinetics study of escitalopram.

Effect of Different Terpene-Containing Essential Oils on Percutaneous Absorption of Trazodone Hydrochloride Through Mouse Epidermis

The aim of our study was to investigate the enhancing effect of several essential oils in the percutaneous absorption of trazodone hydrochloride (TZN). For this purpose, fennel oil, eucalyptus oil, citronella oil, and mentha oil were applied on the skin membrane in three different ways: included in the transdermal device, as a pretreatment, or both. To investigate the effect of penetration enhancers used in this study on the percutaneous absorption of TZN through mouse epidermis, Keshary-Chien diffusion cells were employed. The receptor phase was constantly stirring saline phosphate buffer of pH 7.4 at 37 +/- 1 degrees C. Results showed that pretreatment of skin with essential oils increases the flux values of TZN compared with the values obtained when the same essential oils were included in the transdermal devices. The percutaneous penetration flux for TZN was increased with skin pretreatment by 10% essential oils in the following order: fennel oil > eucalyptus oil > citronella oil > mentha oil. The amount of TZN retained in the skin after pretreatment with essential oils was found to be very similar in all cases and much higher than in the experiments without skin pretreatment.

[Chemico-toxicological study of fluoxetine]

Selected aspects of chemico-toxicological analysis of the tranquillizer drug fluoxetine are described. Optimal conditions for fluoxetin extraction from internal organs and biological fluids (blood, urine) are specified and methods proposed for its detection and quantitation including TLC, UV SPM, and HPLC. The proposed methods were verified using laboratory animals and materials for expert examination.

Pharmacokinetic modeling of non-linear brain distribution of fluvoxamine in the rat

INTRODUCTION

A pharmacokinetic (PK) model is proposed for estimation of total and free brain concentrations of fluvoxamine.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Rats with arterial and venous cannulas and a microdialysis probe in the frontal cortex received intravenous infusions of 1, 3.7 or 7.3 mg.kg(-1) of fluvoxamine.

ANALYSIS

With increasing dose a disproportional increase in brain concentrations was observed. The kinetics of brain distribution was estimated by simultaneous analysis of plasma, free brain ECF and total brain tissue concentrations. The PK model consists of three compartments for fluvoxamine concentrations in plasma in combination with a catenary two compartment model for distribution into the brain. In this catenary model, the mass exchange between a shallow perfusion-limited and a deep brain compartment is described by a passive diffusion term and a saturable active efflux term.

RESULTS

The model resulted in precise estimates of the parameters describing passive influx into (k in) of 0.16 min(-1) and efflux from the shallow brain compartment (k out) of 0.019 min(-1) and the fluvoxamine concentration at which 50% of the maximum active efflux (C 50) is reached of 710 ng.ml(-1). The proposed brain distribution model constitutes a basis for precise characterization of the PK-PD correlation of fluvoxamine by taking into account the non-linearity in brain distribution.

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and other antidepressants and risk of fracture

Our aim was to study fracture risk in users of various antidepressants (tricyclic antidepressants, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, and the group of other antidepressants including monoamine oxidase B inhibitors and drugs with effect on the norepinephrine system) and its relationship with effects on inhibition of the cholinergic and serotonin transporter system. We conducted a case-control study with 124,655 fracture cases and 373,962 age- and gender-matched controls. The exposure was use of antidepressants and a number of confounders. Among the tricyclic antidepressants, amitriptyline and clomipramine were associated with a dose-dependent increase in fracture risk, while imipramine and nortriptyline were not. Amityriptyline was associated with an increased risk of fractures at low doses, while the other tricyclic antidepressants were not. Among the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, citalopram, fluoxetine, and sertraline were associated with a dose-dependent increase in fracture risk, while the increase was borderline statistically insignificant for paroxetine. The group of other antidepressants was not associated with fracture risk. The increase in fracture risk was significantly associated with the pharmacodynamic effect on the serotonin transporter system but not on other signaling systems. The effect of antidepressants on the risk of fractures may be linked to their effect on the serotonin transporter system. While selective serotonin receptor uptake inhibitors were associated with an increased fracture risk, tricyclic antidepressants and the group of other antidepressants were not systematically associated with fracture risk.

Genetic screening for SSRI drug response among those with major depression: great promise and unseen perils

This article examines evidence for the potential benefit of genetic testing for SSRI response, as well as potential ethical and practical implications of the implementation of this test into standard psychiatric practice. We reviewed three areas of the literature: the burden of treatment-resistant and treatment-intolerant major depressive disorders, the evidence for the value of genetic testing to predict drug response, and the ethical and practical issues of genetic testing in usual care. Treatment resistance and treatment intolerance are common for persons treated with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and are associated with both financial and quality-of-life costs. There is strong evidence from association studies that some polymorphisms are associated with SSRI response. However, no randomized trials have yet tested the efficacy of genetic tests to improve outcome in those with treatment resistance or treatment intolerance to SSRIs. Given the nonspecific nature of the test proposed, several ethical concerns are also involved with administering the genetic tests to patients. A randomized trial comparing response in those treated with standard psychiatric care and in those treated with psychiatric care tailored as a result of genetic test results should be completed before the implementation of these tests can be considered. Additionally, the ethical and practical questions concerning the tests must be addressed now, so that the potential impact of these tests on patient care can be well understood prior to adoption in standard practice.

Evaluation of the in vitro biotransformation of fluoxetine with HPLC, mass spectrometry and ecotoxicological tests

Fluoxetine (FLU) is potent and highly selective serotonin-reuptake inhibitor used in the treatment of major depression. The FLU is apparently the most acute toxic pharmaceutical reported so far for aquatic organisms. Very little is known about possible toxicity of its metabolites. Ingested drugs are excreted to the environment in a biologically active form, either as the parent substance or as an active metabolite. This study was designated to assess the ecotoxicity of FLU and its metabolites. FLU and norfluoxetine (NFLU) were very toxic to applied bioassays with LC50 around 0.5 mg l(-1). The compounds affected only slightly stronger the protozoan Spirostomum ambiguum than the crustacean Thamnocephalus platyurus in the 24 h lethality tests. NFLU was 50% more toxic than FLU in both bioassays. FLU was metabolised in vitro with S9 rat liver fraction. The composition of the reaction mixtures was assessed with HPLC-PAD and MS, and their toxicity was evaluated with the bioassays. The chemical analysis showed besides FLU and NFLU the presence of 4-trifluoromethylphenol, which was much less toxic to the bioassays. Predicted toxicity values were calculated on the base of the FLU and NFLU concentrations in the samples and EC50, and LC50's of the pure compounds. The toxicity of the solutions received during the metabolism of FLU can be predicted based on the concept of concentration addition. The results give the strong indication on the importance of investigation not only parent drugs but also their metabolites.

Interaction study of the combined use of paroxetine and fosamprenavir-ritonavir in healthy subjects

Human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients have an increased risk for depression. Despite the high potential for drug-drug interactions, limited data on the combined use of antidepressants and antiretrovirals are available. Theoretically, ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitors may inhibit CYP2D6-mediated metabolism of paroxetine. We wanted to determine the effect of fosamprenavir-ritonavir on paroxetine pharmacokinetics and vice versa and to evaluate the safety of the combination. Group A started with 20 mg paroxetine every day for 10 days; after a wash-out period of 16 days, subjects received paroxetine (20 mg every day) plus fosamprenavir-ritonavir (700/100 mg twice a day) from days 28 to 37. Group B received the regimens in reverse order. On days 10 and 37, pharmacokinetic curves were recorded. Twenty-six healthy subjects (18 females, 8 males) were included. Median (range) age and weight were 44.4 (18.2 to 64.3) years and 68.8 (51.0 to 89.4) kg. Three subjects were excluded (two because of adverse events; one for nonadherence). Addition of fosamprenavir-ritonavir to paroxetine resulted in a significant decrease in paroxetine exposure: the geometric mean ratios (90% confidence intervals) of paroxetine plus fosamprenavir-ritonavir to paroxetine alone were 0.45 (0.41 to 0.49) for the area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 h (AUC(0-24)), 0.49 (0.45 to 0.53) for the maximum concentration of the drug in plasma (C(max)), and 0.75 (0.71 to 0.80) for the apparent elimination half-life (t(1/2)). The free fraction of paroxetine showed a median (interquartile range) increase of 30% (18 to 42%) after the addition of fosamprenavir-ritonavir. The AUC(0-12), C(max), C(min), and t(1/2) of amprenavir and ritonavir were similar to those of historical controls. No serious adverse events occurred. Fosamprenavir-ritonavir reduced total paroxetine exposure by 55%. This is partly explained by protein displacement of paroxetine. We think that this interaction is clinically relevant and that titration to a higher dose of paroxetine may be necessary to accomplish the needed antidepressant effect.

Determination of paroxetine in plasma by liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry for pharmacokinetic and bioequivalence studies

A rapid and validated liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometric method (LC-MS-MS) has been developed and applied to pharmacokinetic and bioequivalence studies in 24 healthy male Korean volunteers. The procedure involves a liquid-liquid extraction of paroxetine (CAS 61869-08-7) and fluoxetine (internal standard, CAS 54910-89-3) with ether/methyl chloride (7:3, v/v) and separated by LC equipped with C18 column using acetonitrile: 5 mmol/L ammonium formate (4:3, v/v) as mobile phase. Detection is carried out on an API 2000 MS system by multiple reactions monitoring mode. The ionization was optimized using ESI(+) and selectivity was achieved by MS-MS analysis, mlz 330.0-->192.0 and m/ z 310-->148 for paroxetine and fluoxetine, respectively. The method has a total run time of 1.5 min and was linear over a working range of 0.05-20 ng/mL and the lower limit of quantification was 0.05 ng/ mL. No endogenous compounds were found to interfere with the analysis. The inter-day and intra-day accuracy was in the ranges of 102.69-107.79% and 102.07-109.57%, respectively and precision of inter-day and intra-day expressed as relative standard deviation were 1.86-9.99% and 1.52-6.28%, respectively. The validation of this method on linearity, specificity, accuracy, precision as well as applicability to pharmacokinetic and bioequivalence studies by analysis of blood samples taken up to 72 h after oral administration of 20 mg of paroxetine in 24 healthy volunteers were found to be good performance.

Effect of terbinafine and voriconazole on the pharmacokinetics of the antidepressant venlafaxine

This study investigated the effect of terbinafine and voriconazole on the pharmacokinetics of venlafaxine in healthy volunteers. Plasma concentrations of venlafaxine and O-desmethylvenlafaxine (ODV) were measured after ingestion of 75 mg venlafaxine without pretreatment (control), after terbinafine pretreatment, or after voriconazole pretreatment. During the terbinafine phase, the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC(0-infinity)) of venlafaxine was on average 490% (P<0.001) and that of ODV 57% (P<0.001) of the corresponding control value. Terbinafine decreased the AUC(0-infinity) ratio of ODV over venlafaxine by 82% (P<0.001). Voriconazole slightly increased the sum of AUC(0-infinity) of venlafaxine plus AUC(0-infinity) of ODV (active moiety) by 31% (P<0.001). The most likely mechanism for the interaction between terbinafine and venlafaxine is the inhibition of CYP2D6-mediated O-demethylation of venlafaxine, whereas the minor effects of voriconazole are probably due to the inhibition of CYP3A4-, CYP2C9-, or CYP2C19-mediated metabolism of venlafaxine.

Effect of itraconazole on pharmacokinetics of paroxetine: the role of gut transporters

A recent in vitro study has shown that paroxetine is a substrate of P-glycoprotein. However, there was no in vivo information indicating the involvement of P-glycoprotein on the pharmacokinetics of paroxetine. The aim of this study was to examine the effects of itraconazole, a P-glycoprotein inhibitor, on the pharmacokinetics of paroxetine. Two 6 day courses of either 200 mg itraconazole daily or placebo with at least a 4 week washout period were conducted. Thirteen volunteers took a single oral 20 mg dose of paroxetine on day 6 of both courses. Plasma concentrations of paroxetine were monitored up to 48 hours after the dosing. Compared with placebo, itraconazole treatment significantly increased the peak plasma concentration (Cmax) of paroxetine by 1.3 fold (6.7 +/- 2.5 versus 9.0 +/- 3.3 ng/mL, P < 0.05) and the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from zero to 48 hours [AUC (0-48)] of paroxetine by 1.5 fold (137 +/- 73 versus 199 +/- 91 ng*h/mL, P < 0.01). Although elimination half-life differed significantly (16.1 +/- 3.4 versus 18.8 +/- 5.9 hours, P < 0.05), the alteration was small (1.1 fold). The present study demonstrated that the bioavailability of paroxetine was increased by itraconazole, suggesting a possible involvement of P-glycoprotein in the pharmacokinetics of paroxetine.

Impact of the Ultrarapid CYP2C19*17 Allele on Serum Concentration of Escitalopram in Psychiatric Patients

Recently, a novel allelic variant of cytochrome P450 2C19 encoding ultrarapid enzyme activity was described (denoted CYP2C19*17). The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of CYP2C19*17 on serum concentration of escitalopram in psychiatric patients. One hundred and sixty-six patients treated with escitalopram were divided into the following subgroups according to CYP2C19 genotype: CYP2C19*17/*17 (n=7), CYP2C19*1/*17 (n=43), CYP2C19*1/*1 (n=60), CYP2C19*17/def (n=16), CYP2C19*1/def (n=34), and CYP2C19def/def (n=6) (def=defective allele, i.e., CYP2C19*2 or *3). Dose-adjusted serum concentrations of escitalopram were compared using the CYP2C19*1/*1 subgroup as reference. Geometric mean of the escitalopram serum concentration was 42% lower in patients homozygous for CYP2C19*17 (P<0.01) and 5.7-fold higher in subjects homozygous for defective CYP2C19 alleles (P<0.001). Of the heterozygous subgroups, only CYP2C19*1/def was significantly different from CYP2C19*1/*1 (P<0.001). In conclusion, a homozygous CYP2C19*17 genotype is associated with lower serum concentration of escitalopram, which might imply increased risk of therapeutic failure.

Stereoselective analysis of hydroxybupropion and application to drug interaction studies

A sensitive and stereoselective assay has been developed for the quantitation of the enantiomers of hydroxybupropion, an active metabolite of bupropion, in human plasma. The assay used liquid-liquid extraction and a Cyclobond I 2000 HPLC column with a mobile phase containing 3% acetonitrile, 0.5% triethylamine, and 20 mM ammonium acetate (pH 3.8). The technique was linear over the concentration range of 12.5-500 ng/ml for (2R,3R)- and (2S,3S)-hydroxybupropion. The method was reproducible as both interday and intraday variabilities were less than 10% for both hydroxybupropion enantiomers. Overall extraction recovery of hydroxybupropion enantiomers and the internal standard phenacetin from plasma was greater than 80% and reproducible over the concentration range of 12.5-500 ng/ml for each enantiomer. The limit of quantification (LOQ) of hydroxybupropion enantiomers was 12.5 ng/ml. The stereoselective pharmacokinetics of both (2R,3R)- and (2S,3S)-hydroxybupropion in healthy male subjects (n = 16) were investigated after a single dose of (rac)-bupropion either alone or during rifampicin administration. (2R,3R)-Hydroxybupropion was the predominant enantiomer present in plasma. A stereoselective effect of rifampicin on hydroxybupropion concentrations was observed, with rifampicin influencing the pharmacokinetics of each hydroxybupropion enantiomer in a different manner. The ratio of (2R,3R)-hydroxybupropion (AUC(0-24)) to (2S,3S)-hydroxybupropion (AUC(0-24)) increased from 4.9 +/- 1.6 to 8.3 +/- 1.9 during rifampicin administration (P < 0.001). A time-dependent change in the hydroxybupropion enantiomeric ratio was observed after (rac)-bupropion administration both before and during rifampicin coadministration, with an increase in the relative proportion of (2S,3S)-hydroxybupropion over the 24 h postdose period.

Determination of the antidepressant paroxetine and its three main metabolites in human plasma by liquid chromatography with fluorescence detection

A high-performance liquid chromatographic method has been developed for the determination in human plasma of the specific serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) antidepressant paroxetine and its three main metabolites (M1, M2, M3). Fluorescence detection was used, exciting at lambda = 294 nm and monitoring emission at lambda = 330 nm for paroxetine (lambda(exc) = 280 nm, lambda(em) = 330 nm for M1 and M2; lambda(exc) = 268 nm, lambda(em) = 290 nm for M3). Separation was obtained on a reversed-phase C18 column using a mobile phase composed of 66.7% aqueous phosphate at pH 2.5 and 33.3% acetonitrile. Imipramine (lambda(exc) = 252 nm, lambda(em) = 390 nm) was used as the internal standard. A careful pre-treatment of plasma samples was developed, using solid-phase extraction with C8 cartridges (50 mg, 1 mL). The calibration curves were linear over a working range of 2.5-100 ng mL(-1) for paroxetine and of 5-100 ng mL(-1) for all metabolites. The limit of detection (LOD) was 1.2 ng mL(-1) for PRX and 2.0 ng mL(-1) for the metabolites. The method was applied with success to plasma samples from depressed patients undergoing treatment with paroxetine. Hence, the method seems to be suitable for the therapeutic drug monitoring of paroxetine and its main metabolites in depressed patients' plasma.

Coadministration of nefazodone and desipramine: a pharmacokinetic interaction study

OBJECTIVE

To determine the potential for pharmacokinetic interaction between nefazodone (NFZ), and desipramine (DMI).

METHOD

A single center, open-label, multiple-dose, parallel-group pharmacokinetic trial conducted in 28 healthy male and female subjects. Group A received DMI 50 mg/day for 2 days followed by DMI 75 mg/day for the next 17 days. On Days 10-14, subjects also received 100 mg NFZ twice daily, and during Days 15-19, the NFZ dose was increased to 150 mg twice daily. Group B received 100 mg NFZ twice daily for 5 days followed by 150 mg NFZ twice daily for the next 14 days. On Days 11-12, subjects also received 50 mg DMI and during Days 13-19, the DMI dose was increased to 75 mg daily. Serial blood samples were collected for Group A and Group B. Plasma concentrations of NFZ and its metabolites, mCPP, hydroxynefazodone (OH-NFZ), and triazoledione, DMI, and the DMI metabolite, 2-hydroxydesipramine (2-OH-DMI) were determined.

RESULTS

Pharmacokinetic analysis demonstrated that the addition of NFZ to DMI did not result in any significant changes in the AUC(0-12), Cmax, or tmax of either DMI or 2-OH-DMI. Addition of DMI to NFZ resulted in statistically significant increases of 40% in the AUC(0-12) and 42% in the Cmax of mCPP. A significant decrease in the AUC(0-12) (19%) of OH-NFZ also was observed. The increase in mCPP may be attributable to inhibition of mCPP metabolism by DMI.

CONCLUSION

Overall, the combined administration of DMI and NFZ appeared to be safe and well tolerated in both treatment groups.

Transfer of escitalopram and its metabolite demethylescitalopram into breastmilk

AIMS

To investigate the transfer of escitalopram and its demethyl metabolite into milk, the absolute and relative infant doses via milk and to assess any unwanted effects in the breastfed infant.

METHODS

Multiple samples of blood and milk were obtained over a dose interval at steady state from eight women who were taking escitalopram for postnatal depression. Drug concentrations in plasma and milk were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography and milk/plasma ratio (M/P(AUC)), absolute infant dose and relative infant dose were estimated by standard methods. Their breastfed infants were also examined clinically and in five infants a blood sample was taken for drug analysis.

RESULTS

The median dose taken by the women was 10 mg day(-1). The mean (95% confidence interval) M/P(AUC) was 2.2 (2.0, 2.4) for escitalopram and 2.2 (1.9, 2.5) for demethylescitalopram. Absolute infant doses were 7.6 microg kg(-1) day(-1) (5.2, 10.0) for escitalopram and 3.0 microg kg(-1) day(-1) (2.4, 3.6) for demethylescitalopram. The total relative infant dose for escitalopram plus its demethyl metabolite was 5.3% (4.2, 6.4) as escitalopram equivalents. All of the infants had met normal developmental milestones and no adverse effects were seen. Compared with average maternal plasma concentrations (24 microg l(-1)), the concentrations of the parent drug and its metabolite in plasma from five infants were most commonly below the limit of detection (</=3 microg l(-1)).

CONCLUSION

The study shows that escitalopram is safe for use during breastfeeding. Because its absolute infant dose is lower than that for an equivalent antidepressant dose of rac-citalopram, it may be preferred over rac-citalopram in treating depression in lactating women. Nevertheless, each decision to breastfeed should always be made on the basis of an individual risk:benefit analysis.

High-throughput quantitation of nefazodone and its metabolites in human plasma by high flow direct-injection LC–MS/MS

A rapid, selective and sensitive high-performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method coupled with high flow direct-injection on-line extraction has been developed and validated for the simultaneous quantitation of nefazodone and its three active metabolites, hydroxynefazodone, triazole-dione (BMS-180492) and m-chlorophyenylpiperazine (mCPP) in human plasma. The method utilized d7-nefazodone, d7-hydroxynefazodone, d4-BMS-180492 and d4-mCPP as internal standards (IS). The plasma samples were injected into the LC-MS/MS system after simply adding the internal standard solution and centrifuging. The required extraction and chromatographic separation of the analytes were achieved on an Oasis HLB column (on-line extraction column, 1 mm x 50 mm, 30 microm) and a conventional Luna C8 column (analytical column, 4.6 mm x 50 mm, 5 microm). Detection was by positive ion electrospray tandem mass spectrometry. The total analysis run time for each sample was 2 min, which included the time needed for on-line extraction, chromatographic separation and LC-MS/MS analysis. The assay was validated for each analyte and the concentrations ranged from 2.0 to 500 ng/ml for nefazodone, hydroxynefazodone and mCPP and from 4.0 to 1000 ng/ml for BMS-180492, respectively. The assay was used for the high-throughput sample analysis of thousands of pharmacokinetic study samples and was proven to be rapid, accurate, precise, sensitive, specific and rugged.

[Determination of citalopram in human plasma with LC-MS/MS method and its bioequivalent evaluation]

A sensitive and selective LC-MS/MS method for determination of citalopram in human plasma was established to study the bioequivalence of different formulations containing citalopram. The samples were simply pretreated by protein precipitation using acetonitrile, and then analyzed on a Zorbax Extend C8 column. The mobile phase consisted of acetonitrile-water-formic acid (60:40:0.2), at a flow-rate of 0.5 mL x min(-1). A Thermo Finnigan TSQ Quantum Ultra tandem mass spectrometer equipped with electrospray ionization source was used as detector and was operated in the positive ion mode. Selected reaction monitoring using the precursor to product ion combinations of m/z 325 --> m/z 109 and m/z 265 --> m/z 167 was performed to quantify citalopram and the internal standard, respectively. The pharmacokinetic parameters of citalopram in different formulations were calculated by non-compartment model. The linear calibration curves were obtained in the concentration range of 0.10-100 microg x L(-1). The lower limit of quantification was 0.10 microg x L(-1). The intra- and inter-day relative standard deviation (RSD) over the entire concentration range was less than 5.2%. Accuracy determined at three concentrations (0.25, 8.00 and 90.0 microg x L(-1) for citalopram) ranged from -4.7% to 1.3%. Each plasma sample was chromatographed within 3.0 min. The method was successfully used in bioequivalence study of citalopram in human plasma after oral administration of 20 mg citalopram. Calculated with AUC(0-120 h), the bioavailability of two formulations was (102.1 +/- 10.9)%. The method is rapid, selective, robust and is proved to be suitable for bioequivalence evaluation of different formulations containing citalopram.

Effect of renal impairment on the pharmacokinetics of bupropion and its metabolites

AIMS

To investigate the effect of kidney disease on bupropion pharmacokinetics and on cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2B6 activity as measured by bupropion hydroxylation.

METHODS

In an open parallel group study, 17 healthy, nonsmoking subjects and 10 patients with impaired kidney function received a single 150 mg oral dose of sustained release bupropion. Plasma concentrations of bupropion and its metabolites were measured for up to 72 h. Subjects were genotyped for the CYP2B6 SNPs 1459 C>T, 785 A>G and 516 G>T.

RESULTS

Bupropion AUC was 126% higher (P < 0.0001, 95% CI +72%, +180%), C(max) 86% higher (P = 0.001, 95% CI +40%, +131%), CL/F 63% lower (P = 0.001, 95% CI -29%, -96%), and t(1/2) 140% longer (P = 0.001, 95% CI +76%, +204%) in renally impaired patients. However, only minor changes were detected in the concentrations of the metabolites. In renally impaired subjects the hydroxybupropion : bupropion AUC ratio was decreased by 66% (P = < 0.0001, 95% CI -19%, -114%) and the hydrobupropion : bupropion AUC ratio by 69% (P = 0.001, 95% CI +8%, -146%) compared with controls.

CONCLUSIONS

The CL/F of bupropion was significantly lower in subjects with renal impairment. Because the principal metabolites of bupropion possess similar pharmacological activity to the parent compound, dosage recommendations for patients with renal impairment cannot be given. A direct effect of renal impairment on CYP2B6 activity could not be demonstrated by the present study design.

Pharmacokinetics of mirtazapine: enantioselective effects of the CYP2D6 ultra rapid metabolizer genotype and correlation with adverse effects

Enantiomerically pure drugs and genotyping are promising approaches to achieve optimization in antidepressant therapy. Mirtazapine is a mixed noradrenergic serotoninergic antidepressant used as a racemate. We analyzed pharmacokinetics of its enantiomers in relation to CYP2D6 genotype and in relation to its adverse effects. Mirtazapine was enantioselectively absorbed from the gut with a rate constant of 0.2 min-1 for S+, but 0.08 min-1 for R- mirtazapine. Kinetics of R- mirtazapine was only marginally dependent on CYP2D6 genotype, but total clearance of the S+ enantiomer were 1.3, 2.3, and 3.4 L min-1 in poor, extensive, and ultrarapid metabolizers of CYP2D6 substrates with apparent substantial first-pass metabolism in rapid and ultrarapid metabolizers. Mirtazapine effects on heart rate and blood pressure correlated much more strongly with R- then with S+ concentrations, whereas sedation correlated similarly with both enantiomers. At least concerning some adverse effects, it might be worthwhile to study further mirtazapine enantiospecifically.

Lopinavir/ritonavir reduces bupropion plasma concentrations in healthy subjects

Limited data are available about the effect of steady-state lopinavir and ritonavir (LPV/r) on bupropion pharmacokinetics. As patients may benefit by using these two agents in combination, this study determined the extent and direction of this drug-drug interaction. Twelve healthy volunteers received a single 100 mg dose of sustained-release bupropion before and after 2 weeks of treatment with LPV/r 400 mg/100 mg twice daily. Pharmacokinetics profiles were determined on days 1 and 30 for bupropion and hydroxybupropion and days 29 and 30 for LPV/r. LPV/r administration significantly decreased bupropion maximum plasma concentration (C(max)) by 57% (90% confidence interval (CI), 38-76%; P<0.01) and area under the curve (AUC) infinity by 57% (90% CI, 32-83%; P<0.01). Hydroxybupropion C(max) and AUC infinity decreased by 31% (90% CI, 7-55%; P<0.01) and by 50% (90% CI, 34-65%; P<0.01), respectively. No significant changes in the pharmacokinetics of LPV/r were found following administration of a single dose of bupropion. Concurrent use of LPV/r and bupropion resulted in decreased exposure to bupropion and its active metabolite hydroxybupropion that may necessitate as much as a 100% dose increase of bupropion. A probable mechanism for this interaction is the concurrent induction of cytochrome P450 2B6 and UDP-glucuronosyltransferase enzymes. LPV/r exposure is unaffected by a single dose of bupropion.