Practical guidance for direct oral anticoagulant use in the treatment of venous thromboembolism in primary and metastatic brain tumor patients

Management of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with primary and metastatic brain tumors (BT) is challenging because of the risk of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). There are no prospective clinical trials evaluating safety and efficacy of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), specifically in patients with BT, but they are widely used for VTE in this population. A group of neuro-oncology experts convened to provide practical clinical guidance for the off-label use of DOACs in treating VTE in patients with BT. We searched PubMed for the following terms: BTs, glioma, glioblastoma (GBM), brain metastasis, VTE, heparin, low-molecular-weight heparin (LWMH), DOACs, and ICH. Although prospective clinical trials are needed, the recommendations presented aim to assist clinicians in making informed decisions regarding DOACs for VTE in patients with BT.

Genome-matched treatments and patient outcomes in the Maine Cancer Genomics Initiative (MCGI)

Genomic tumor testing (GTT) is an emerging technology aimed at identifying variants in tumors that can be targeted with genomically matched drugs. Due to limited resources, rural patients receiving care in community oncology settings may be less likely to benefit from GTT. We analyzed GTT results and observational clinical outcomes data from patients enrolled in the Maine Cancer Genomics Initiative (MCGI), which provided access to GTTs; clinician educational resources; and genomic tumor boards in community practices in a predominantly rural state. 1603 adult cancer patients completed enrollment; 1258 had at least one potentially actionable variant identified. 206 (16.4%) patients received a total of 240 genome matched treatments, of those treatments, 64% were FDA-approved in the tumor type, 27% FDA-approved in a different tumor type and 9% were given on a clinical trial. Using Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting to adjust for baseline characteristics, a Cox proportional hazards model demonstrated that patients who received genome matched treatment were 31% less likely to die within 1 year compared to those who did not receive genome matched treatment (HR: 0.69; 95% CI: 0.52-0.90; p-value: 0.006). Overall, GTT through this initiative resulted in levels of genome matched treatment that were similar to other initiatives, however, clinical trials represented a smaller share of treatments than previously reported, and "off-label" treatments represented a greater share. Although this was an observational study, we found evidence for a potential 1-year survival benefit for patients who received genome matched treatments. These findings suggest that when disseminated and implemented with a supportive infrastructure, GTT may benefit cancer patients in rural community oncology settings, with further work remaining on providing genome-matched clinical trials.

Inaugural Results of the Individualized Screening Trial of Innovative Glioblastoma Therapy: A Phase II Platform Trial for Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma Using Bayesian Adaptive Randomization

PURPOSE

The Individualized Screening Trial of Innovative Glioblastoma Therapy (INSIGhT) is a phase II platform trial that uses response adaptive randomization and genomic profiling to efficiently identify novel therapies for phase III testing. Three initial experimental arms (abemaciclib [a cyclin-dependent kinase [CDK]4/6 inhibitor], neratinib [an epidermal growth factor receptor [EGFR]/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 inhibitor], and CC-115 [a deoxyribonucleic acid-dependent protein kinase/mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor]) were simultaneously evaluated against a common control arm. We report the results for each arm and examine the feasibility and conduct of the adaptive platform design.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with newly diagnosed O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase-unmethylated glioblastoma were eligible if they had tumor genotyping to identify prespecified biomarker subpopulations of dominant glioblastoma signaling pathways (EGFR, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase, and CDK). Initial random assignment was 1:1:1:1 between control (radiation therapy and temozolomide) and the experimental arms. Subsequent Bayesian adaptive randomization was incorporated on the basis of biomarker-specific progression-free survival (PFS) data. The primary end point was overall survival (OS), and one-sided P values are reported. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (identifier: NCT02977780).

RESULTS

Two hundred thirty-seven patients were treated (71 control; 73 abemaciclib; 81 neratinib; 12 CC-115) in years 2017-2021. Abemaciclib and neratinib were well tolerated, but CC-115 was associated with ≥ grade 3 treatment-related toxicity in 58% of patients. PFS was significantly longer with abemaciclib (hazard ratio [HR], 0.72; 95% CI, 0.49 to 1.06; one-sided P = .046) and neratinib (HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.50 to 1.02; one-sided P = .033) relative to the control arm but there was no PFS benefit with CC-115 (one-sided P = .523). None of the experimental therapies demonstrated a significant OS benefit (P > .05).

CONCLUSION

The INSIGhT design enabled efficient simultaneous testing of three experimental agents using a shared control arm and adaptive randomization. Two investigational arms had superior PFS compared with the control arm, but none demonstrated an OS benefit. The INSIGhT design may promote improved and more efficient therapeutic discovery in glioblastoma. New arms have been added to the trial.

The Maine Cancer Genomics Initiative: Implementing a Community Cancer Genomics Program Across an Entire Rural State

PURPOSE

The Maine Cancer Genomics Initiative (MCGI) aimed to overcome patient- and provider-level barriers to using genomic tumor testing (GTT) in rural practices by providing genomic tumor boards (GTBs), clinician education, and access to comprehensive large-panel next-generation sequencing to all patients with cancer in Maine. This paper describes the successful implementation of the initiative and three key services made operative between 2016 and 2020.

METHODS

A community-inclusive, hub-and-spoke approach was taken to implement the three program components: (1) a centralized GTB program; (2) a modular online education program, designed using an iterative approach with broad clinical stakeholders; and (3) GTT free of charge to clinicians and patients. Implementation timelines, participation metrics, and survey data were used to describe the rollout.

RESULTS

The MCGI was launched over an 18-month period at all 19 oncology practices in the State. Seventy-nine physicians (66 medical oncologists, 5 gynecologic oncologists, 1 neuro-oncologist, and 7 pediatric oncologists) enrolled on the study, representing 100% of all practicing oncologists in Maine. Between July 2017 and September 2020, 1610 patients were enrolled. A total of 515 cases were discussed by 47 (73%) clinicians in 196 GTBs. Clinicians who participated in the GTBs enrolled significantly more patients on the study, stayed in Maine, and reported less time spent in clinical patient care.

CONCLUSION

The MCGI was able to engage geographically and culturally disparate cancer care practices in a precision oncology program using a hub-and-spoke model. By facilitating access to GTT, structured education, and GTBs, we narrowed the gap in the implementation of precision oncology in one of the most rural states in the country.

Cancer stem cell assay-guided chemotherapy improves survival of patients with recurrent glioblastoma in a randomized trial

Therapy-resistant cancer stem cells (CSCs) contribute to the poor clinical outcomes of patients with recurrent glioblastoma (rGBM) who fail standard of care (SOC) therapy. ChemoID is a clinically validated assay for identifying CSC-targeted cytotoxic therapies in solid tumors. In a randomized clinical trial (NCT03632135), the ChemoID assay, a personalized approach for selecting the most effective treatment from FDA-approved chemotherapies, improves the survival of patients with rGBM (2016 WHO classification) over physician-chosen chemotherapy. In the ChemoID assay-guided group, median survival is 12.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 10.2-14.7) compared with 9 months (95% CI, 4.2-13.8) in the physician-choice group (p = 0.010) as per interim efficacy analysis. The ChemoID assay-guided group has a significantly lower risk of death (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.44; 95% CI, 0.24-0.81; p = 0.008). Results of this study offer a promising way to provide more affordable treatment for patients with rGBM in lower socioeconomic groups in the US and around the world.

NIMG-52. UTILITY OF ARTERIAL SPIN LABELING (ASL) AND DYNAMIC SUSCEPTIBILITY CONTRAST (DSC) PERFUSION MRI IMAGING IN DISTINGUISHING PSEUDOPROGRESSION IN GLIOBLASTOMA

Pseudoprogression is a radiographic phenomenon in which increase in post contrast enhancement can mimic tumor progression while actually representing treatment effect. This occurs in up to 30% of glioblastoma (GBM) patients, with higher rate in O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) methylated patient, and may lead to premature discontinuation of therapy. Perfusion imaging, with either DSC and/or ASL can sometimes help differentiate between progression (Pr) versus pseudoprogression (PsPr) noninvasively. Between 2009-2019, we conducted a retrospective study of GBM patients diagnosed between 2009-2019 at Maine Medical Center who received standard of care (surgery/radiation/temozolomide), subsequently displayed changes concerning for progression (n=23) or pseudoprogression (n=3) within 12 months from completion of radiation, and who had a second resection for pathological assessment. Perfusion values were analyzed by assessing DSC ratios and grading ASL signal on MRI. 7/25 patients were MGMT methylated in the Pr group compared to 1/3 patients in the PsPr group. Both Pr and PsPr patients had similar mean DSC ratios (2.098 Pr and 2.200 PsPr, p = NS). Mean ASL grade was 2.4 for Pr patients versus 1.3 for PsPr patients, p = NS. ASL grades of 2 or higher had a sensitivity of 62% (95% CI [36, 83%]) and specificity of 33% (95% CI [6, 79%]) in distinguishing Pr from PsPr patients. DSC ratios of 1 or greater had a sensitivity of 96% (95% CI [80, 99%]) and specificity of 0% (95% CI [0, 66%]) for Pr versus PsPr patients. When both DSC ratios of 1 or greater and ASL grade of 2 or higher were combined, sensitivity remained high at 91% (95% CI [62, 98%]) with specificity of 0% (95% CI [0, 66%]). Despite the limited number of PsPr patients, results support the use of both DSC and ASL measurements to guide the determination of progression versus pseudoprogression in treated glioblastoma patients.

CTNI-17. A MULTI-INSTITUTIONAL RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIAL COMPARING ASSAY - GUIDED CHEMOTHERAPY WITH PHYSICIAN-CHOICE TREATMENT FOR RECURRENT HIGH-GRADE GLIOMA (NCT03632135)

The presence of therapy-resistant cancer stem cells (CSCs) in recurrent high-grade glioma (HGG) patients contributes to poor clinical outcomes. The ChemoID functional anti-cancer assay targets cancer stem cells along with the bulk of the tumor cells. This trial aims to determine if ChemoID assay-guided treatment improves survival rates for recurrent HGG patients compared to the empirically physician-selected treatment. Patients with grade-III/IV recurrent glioma who failed standard of care (SOC) therapy were randomized (1:1) between two intervention groups. They received one of fourteen mono or combination chemotherapies based on the ChemoID assay or physician choice. The study met the primary outcome in the first interim analysis of 50 patients as per protocol. The ChemoID group had an improved survival rate (vs physician-choice). Median OS (mOS) was 12.5 months in the ChemoID group (95% CI, 10.2-14.7) vs 9 months in the physician-choice (95% CI, 4.2-13.8; log-rank P = .010). Mortality risk was lower in the ChemoID group (HR = 0.44; 95% CI, 0.24-0.81; P = .008). Median progression-free survival was 10.1 months in the ChemoID group vs 3.5 months in the physician choice (95% CI, 4.8-15.4 vs 1.9-5.1; log-rank < 0.001). Risk of progression was lower in the ChemoID group (HR = 0.25; 95% CI, 0.14-0.44; P < 0.001). The intention to treat (ITT) analysis of 78 patients showed substantially improved OS. The ChemoID group had a statistically significant longer median survival of 4.5 months. mOS was 12.0 months in the ChemoID group (95% CI, 10.8-13.2) vs 7.5 in the physician-choice group (95% CI, 3.5-11.5; log-rank P = .009). The ChemoID group had a decreased mortality risk (HR = 0.52; 95% CI, 0.24-0.81; P = .008). Compared with the physician-choice, the ChemoID group had a significantly longer OS in the ITT population. Our findings support that screening standard cytotoxic chemotherapies with a patient-specific anti-cancer assay improves survival outcomes in recurrent HGG patients.

Abstract CT224: Multi-institutional randomized phase-3 trial comparing cancer stem cell-targeted vs physician-choice treatments in patients with recurrent high-grade gliomas (NCT03632135)

Background: Clinical outcomes in patients with recurrent high-grade glioma (HGG) remain poor. Cancer stem cells (CSCs) have been implicated in metastasis, treatment resistance and recurrence of HHGs. We have shown in several clinical studies that anti-CSC-directed therapy provides benefits in many cancer types; however, this is the first report of a randomized clinical trial evaluating it for recurrent HGGs. Objective: Determine whether CSC-targeted cytotoxic agents selected by ChemoID assay-guided therapy improves survival in patients with recurrent HGG.

Design, Settings, and Participants: In this parallel-group, randomized, phase-3 clinical trial, patients at 13 clinical sites in the USA with grade-III/IV recurrent glioma (2016 WHO guidelines) were randomized 1:1 to either ChemoID assay-guided therapy or physician-choice therapy, and then treated and followed until unacceptable toxic effects, hospice, or death.

Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS).

Results: Combined median follow-up was 9 months. Median OS (mOS) was 12.5 months (95% CI, 10.2-14.7) in the ChemoID assay-guided group vs 9 months (95% CI, 4.2-13.8) in the physician-choice group (log-rank P = .010). Risk of death was significantly lower in the ChemoID assay group (HR = 0.44; 95% CI, 0.24-0.81; P = .008). Median progression free survival (PFS) was 10.1 vs 3.5 months (95% CI, 4.8-15.4 vs 1.9-5.1) (HR, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.14-0.44; P < .001).

Conclusions and Relevance: Primary endpoint was met in this randomized clinical trial. The mOS was 3.5 months longer in the ChemoID assay-guided group vs the physician-choice group demonstrating the clinical advantage of treating HGG patients using CSC personalized therapy.

Citation Format: Tulika Ranjan, Soma Sengupta, Alexander Yu, Candace M. Howard, Ricky Chen, Rekha Chaudhary, Nicholas Marko, Dawit Aregawi, Michael Glantz, Jon Glass, Richard M. Green, Christine Lu-Emerson, Aaron Mammoser, Hugh Moulding, Steven Jubelirer, Jason Schroeder, Mark Anderson, Frances Chow, Seth Lirette, Krista Denning, Anthony Alberico, Jagan Valluri, Pier Paolo Claudio. Multi-institutional randomized phase-3 trial comparing cancer stem cell-targeted vs physician-choice treatments in patients with recurrent high-grade gliomas (NCT03632135) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr CT224.

Multi-institutional randomized phase 3 trial comparing cancer stem cell-targeted versus physician-choice treatments in patients with recurrent high-grade gliomas (NCT03632135)

2028

Background: Clinical outcomes in patients with recurrent high-grade glioma (HGG) remain poor. Cancer stem cells (CSCs) have been implicated in metastasis, treatment resistance and recurrence of HHGs. We have shown in several clinical studies that anti-CSC-directed therapy selected by ChemoID assay provides benefits in many cancer types; however, this is the first report of a randomized clinical trial evaluating whether CSC-targeted cytotoxic agents selected by ChemoID assay-guided therapy improves survival in patients with recurrent HGG. Methods: In this parallel-group, randomized, phase-3 clinical trial, patients at 13 clinical sites in the USA with grade-III/IV recurrent glioma (2016 WHO guidelines) were randomized 1:1 to either ChemoID assay-guided therapy or physician-choice therapy, and then treated and followed until unacceptable toxic effects, hospice, or death. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Results: Combined median follow-up was 9 months. Median OS (mOS) was 12.5 months (95% CI, 10.2-14.7) in the ChemoID assay-guided group vs 9 months (95% CI, 4.2-13.8) in the physician-choice group (log-rank P =.010). Risk of death was significantly lower in the ChemoID assay group (HR = 0.44; 95% CI, 0.24-0.81; P =.008). Median progression free survival (PFS) was 10.1 vs 3.5 months (95% CI, 4.8-15.4 vs 1.9-5.1) (HR, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.14-0.44; P <.001). Conclusions: Primary endpoint was met in this randomized clinical trial. The mOS was 3.5 months longer in the ChemoID assay-guided group vs the physician-choice group. Clinical trial information: NCT03632135.

Feasibility and conduct of INSIGhT, a platform trial of patients with glioblastoma using Bayesian adaptive randomization

2012

Background: Individualized Screening Trial of Innovative Glioblastoma Therapy (INSIGhT) trial is a phase II platform trial using response adaptive randomization and deep genomic profiling to more efficiently test experimental agents in MGMT unmethylated glioblastoma and potentially accelerate identification of novel therapies for phase III testing. We report on the feasibility and conduct of this approach. Methods: Tumor genotyping was performed prior to treatment assignment on eligible participants with newly diagnosed MGMT-unmethylated glioblastoma to identify biomarker signatures. Initial randomization was 1:1:1:1 between control (temozolomide) and 3 experimental arms (abemaciclib, CC-115, and neratinib). Subsequent randomization was adapted based on Bayesian estimation of biomarker-naïve and biomarker-specific probabilities of treatment impact on progression-free survival (PFS). Ineffective or toxic arms were discontinued by protocol amendment. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Results: INSIGhT randomized 71 patients to the control arm, 73 patients to the abemaciclib arm, 12 patients to the CC-115 arm, and 81 patients to the neratinib arm between 2/9/2017 and 5/14/2021. Following the initial equal randomization period, early data were repeatedly analyzed during the study to capture early signals of treatment effects across the enrolled population or in specific biomarker subgroups. The results of these interim analyses influenced the randomization probability for future enrolled patients. In total, 77% of the participants were randomized before assessing their biomarker profile and 23% were biomarker randomized. The CC-115 arm opened and closed three times during the safety lead-in. The randomization probability to the CC-115 arm decreased based on poor early PFS results and the arm eventually closed after 12 patients due to toxicity. The randomization probability to the abemacicilb arm increased based on promising early PFS results. After the completion of accrual into the abemaciclib arm, the trial switched to block randomization to finish enrolling into the remaining neratinib and control arms. A total of 28 interim analyses and 32 randomization tables were created throughout the course of the trial with 4 adjustments (3 due to CC-115 closures and 1 due to completion of the abemaciclib arm). Biomarker association trends for neratinib and abemaciclib were similar to those seen in preclinical modeling of the trial. Conclusions: Relative to a standard randomization design, the adaptive platform design facilitated more efficient and economical testing of experimental arms by sharing a control arm, decreasing the probability of enrollment to potentially ineffective arms, and increasing the probability of enrollment to potentially effective arms. Additional future arms are planned on INSIGhT. Clinical trial information: NCT02977780.

CTNI-40. EVALUATING FEASIBILITY AND EFFICIENCY OF PHASE II ADAPTIVE PLATFORM TRIAL DESIGNS BASED ON THE INDIVIDUALIZED SCREENING TRIAL OF INNOVATIVE GLIOBLASTOMA THERAPY (INSIGhT) EXPERIENCE

BACKGROUND

The Individualized Screening Trial of Innovative Glioblastoma Therapy (INSIGhT) is a phase II platform trial with Bayesian adaptive randomization and deep genomic profiling to more efficiently test experimental agents in newly diagnosed glioblastoma and to prioritize therapies for late-stage testing.

METHODS

In the ongoing INSIGhT trial, patients with newly diagnosed MGMT-unmethylated glioblastoma are randomized to the control arm or one of three experimental therapy arms (CC-115, abemaciclib, and neratinib). The control arm therapy is radiotherapy with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide, and primary endpoint is overall survival. Randomization has been adapted based on Bayesian estimation of biomarker-specific probability of treatment impact on progression-free survival (PFS). All tumors undergo detailed molecular sequencing, and this is facilitated with the companion ALLELE protocol. To evaluate feasibility of this approach, we assessed the status of this ongoing trial.

RESULTS

Since INSIGhT was activated 4.3 years ago, it has expanded to include 12 sites across the United States. A total of 247 patients have been enrolled. Randomization probabilities have been repeatedly adjusted over time based upon early PFS results to alter the randomization ratio from standard 1:1:1:1 randomization. All three arms have completed accrual and efficacy estimates are available based upon comparison to the common control arm in context of relevant biomarkers. There are 87 patients alive and in follow-up, and there are ongoing plans to add additional arms to evaluate further treatments in the future.

CONCLUSION

The INSIGhT trial demonstrates that a multi-center Bayesian adaptive platform trial is a feasible and effective approach to help prioritize therapies and biomarkers for newly diagnosed GBM. The trial has maintained robust accrual, and the simultaneous testing of multiple agents, sharing a common control arm and adaptive randomization serve as features to increase trial efficiency relative to traditional clinical trial designs.

CTNI-05. PRELIMINARY RESULTS OF THE NERATINIB ARM IN THE INDIVIDUALIZED SCREENING TRIAL OF INNOVATIVE GLIOBLASTOMA THERAPY (INSIGHT): A PHASE II PLATFORM TRIAL USING BAYESIAN ADAPTIVE RANDOMIZATION

BACKGROUND

EGFR is amplified in over 50% of glioblastoma and 20-30% have EGFRvIII mutations. Neratinib is a potent inhibitor of EGFR/HER2 approved for metastatic HER2+ breast cancer. To efficiently evaluate the potential impact of neratinib on overall survival (OS) in newly-diagnosed glioblastoma and to simultaneously develop information regarding potential genomic biomarker associations, neratinib was included as an arm on the Individualized Screening Trial of Innovative Glioblastoma Therapy (INSIGhT) trial. INSIGhT is a phase II platform trial using response adaptive randomization and deep genomic profiling to more efficiently test experimental agents in MGMT unmethylated glioblastoma and accelerate identification of novel therapies for phase III testing. Initial randomization was equal between neratinib, control, and two other experimental arms but subsequent randomization was adapted based on efficacy as determined by progression-free survival (PFS). We report preliminary results for the neratinib arm.

METHODS

Patients with newly diagnosed MGMT-unmethylated glioblastoma were randomized to receive either radiotherapy with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide or standard radiochemotherapy followed by adjuvant neratinib (240 mg daily). Treatment continued until progression or development of unacceptable toxicities. The primary endpoint was OS. Association between neratinib efficacy and EGFR amplification was also investigated.

RESULTS

There were 144 patients (70 control; 74 neratinib). Neratinib was reasonably well-tolerated with no new toxicity signals identified. PFS was compared (HR 0.84; p=0.38, logrank test – not significant) between the neratinib (median 6.05 months) and control (median 5.82 months) arms. For patients EGFR pathway activation the PFS HR was 0.53 (p-value=0.03 – significant, median PFS: neratinib, 6.21 months, control, 5.26 months). However, there was no significant improvement in OS in EGFR amplified/mutated patients (HR 1.05; p-value 0.87) between neratinib (median 14.2) compared to the control arm (median 14.6).

CONCLUSION

Neratinib prolonged PFS in the EGFR positive subpopulation but there was no overall PFS benefit, or any OS improvement.

A phase II open-label study in adult and adolescent patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors harboring fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) gene alterations

TPS480

Background: The pan- FGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor erdafitinib is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for adults with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma and susceptible FGFR3/2 genetic alterations who have progressed during or after ≥ 1 line of prior platinum-containing chemotherapy. FGFR gene alterations are potential oncogenic drivers that have been reported in many solid tumors in adult and pediatric pts. Because of limited response to standard of care options in pts failing systemic therapy, there is strong rationale to assess the safety and efficacy of erdafitinib in adolescent and adult pts with advanced solid tumors and FGFR alterations. Methods: This phase 2, open-label study (RAGNAR/42756493CAN2002; NCT04083976) will include pts aged ≥ 12 years with histologically confirmed unresectable, locally advanced, or metastatic solid tumors (except urothelial tumors) harboring predefined FGFR mutations or fusions. Eligibility screening includes molecular screening for FGFR alterations by central or local next-generation sequencing assays, and other clinical criteria. Pts will enroll into either a broad panel cohort (BPC) of target FGFR alterations or an exploratory cohort (EC) for FGFR alterations that do not meet criteria for BPC. Approximately 280 pts (BPC, n = 240; EC, n = 40) will be enrolled. The primary efficacy end point is overall response rate (ORR) as assessed by the independent review committee. Secondary end points include investigator-assessed ORR, duration of response, disease control rate, progression-free survival, overall survival, safety, pharmacokinetics, and health-related quality of life. Safety assessments include adverse events, vital signs, electrocardiograms, physical examinations, laboratory tests, performance status assessment, growth assessments in adolescents, and ophthalmologic examination. As of December 2019, pts are being enrolled at ~158 sites in 15 countries. Results of this study will provide efficacy and safety data for erdafitinib across multiple solid tumors with FGFR alterations and evaluate the potential benefit of targeting the underlying altered biology of FGFR irrespective of tumor histology in adult and adolescent pts. Clinical trial information: NCT04083976.

CTNI-34. INITIAL ANALYSIS OF PHASE-III TRIAL - STANDARD CHEMOTHERAPY VS. CHEMOTHERAPY GUIDED BY A CANCER STEM CELL TEST IN RECURRENT GLIOBLASTOMA (NCT03632135)

BACKGROUND

ChemoID is a cancer stem cell (CSC) cytotoxicity assay for guiding personalized treatment in the clinical trial NCT03632135 using standard-of-care drugs for improving clinical outcomes. The ChemoID assay is a functional test that determines the response to chemotherapy treatments from a panel of FDA approved drugs or their combinations. The trial aims to determine the clinical utility of the ChemoID assay as a predictor of clinical response in recurrent glioblastoma (GBM).

METHODS

The study has been designed as a parallel group controlled clinical trial where participants with recurrent GBM amenable to surgery or biopsy are randomized at a ratio of 1:1 to either standard-of-care chemotherapy chosen by the physician or ChemoID-guided therapy. Response to therapy is measured by MRI imaging (RANO 1.1). The primary endpoint is median overall survival (OS) and secondary endpoints are OS at 6, 9, and 12 months, median progression-free survival (PFS), PFS at 4, 6, 9, and 12 months, objective tumor response, time to recurrence, and quality of life.

RESULTS

A total of 41 participants (29 males, 12 females) have been accrued to the trial thus far with a median age of 61yo. Data from 38 participants (27 males, 11 females) has reached maturity for analysis. 21 participants have been randomized to the assay-guided arm and 17 to the physician-choice arm. From an initial analysis, we observed that 71% (15/21) of the participants in the ChemoID-guided arm are alive and 29% (6/21) are deceased. We also observed that 41% (7/17) of the participants in the physician-choice arm are alive and 59% (10/17) are deceased. This gives the odds of death for the ChemoID-guided arm to be 72% lower than on the physician-guided arm (OR=0.28; (0.07–1.08); p=0.065).

CONCLUSIONS

Our preliminary results indicate that the ChemoID assay has the potential to improve survival of recurrent GBM patients.

BIOM-23. MOLECULAR PROFILING IDENTIFIES NOVEL BIOMARKERS IN A RURAL COHORT OF PATIENTS WITH GLIOBLASTOMA

BACKGROUND

The rural state of Maine has one of the highest incidences of primary malignant brain cancer in the United States. We sought to investigate the genomic landscape of glioblastoma (GBM) in Maine.

METHODS

Targeted next generation sequencing of 209 cancer related genes was performed on tumor samples from 60 patients diagnosed with GBM at our institution between 2014 and 2019. We compared mutation frequencies between patients grouped according to the published median overall survival for GBM: &lt; 14 months (n = 14) and ≥ 14 months (n = 43, including 23 patients still alive). We excluded patients who were alive but diagnosed less than 14 months prior to analysis (n = 3).

RESULTS

Across all groups frequent molecular markers included EGFR (49%), TP53 (38%), CDKN2A (17.5%), PIK3R1 (15.8%), PDGFRA (12.2%), PIK3CA (10.5%), PTEN (19%), NF1 (10.5%) and IDH1/2 (10%); frequencies did not differ significantly between groups. MGMT methylation was similar between groups (6/14 (42.9%) in shorter survivors and 18/41 (43.9%) in longer survivors). FANC group mutations were more frequent in longer survivors (13/43 [30%] versus 0/14 [0%], p = 0.025). Among shorter survivors CDKN2A deletions were slightly more frequent (5/14 (45%) versus 5/43 (11%), p = 0.099). FES, KIAA1524, FLT (all 5/43,11.6%) and EPH (6/43, 14.0%) were only observed in longer survivors. These mutations co-occurred with 4/5 CDKN2A deletions in longer survivors. After excluding those 4 cases, CDKN2A deletions were significantly associated with shorter survival (5/14 [35.7%] versus 1/39 [2.6%]), p=0.004.

CONCLUSION

FANC group mutations may be a novel prognostic biomarker for longer survival in a rural cohort with GBM. CDKN2A deletions may be associated with shorter survival, but this may be ameliorated by co-occurring FES, KIAA1524, FLT, and EPH mutations.

CTNI-11. CC-115 IN NEWLY DIAGNOSED MGMT UNMETHYLATED GLIOBLASTOMA IN THE INDIVIDUALIZED SCREENING TRIAL OF INNOVATIVE GLIOBLASTOMA THERAPY (INSIGHT): A PHASE II RANDOMIZED BAYESIAN ADAPTIVE PLATFORM TRIAL

BACKGROUND

CC-115 is an oral, CNS-penetrant, selective inhibitor of mammalian target of rapamycin kinase (mTOR) and deoxyribonucleic acid-dependent protein kinase (DNA-PK). Both targets are important in glioblastoma; PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling is hyperactive in most glioblastomas, and DNA-PK is integral to repair of radiotherapy-mediated DNA damage. To investigate CC-115 in newly diagnosed glioblastoma and explore potential genomic biomarker associations, CC-115 was evaluated in the Individualized Screening Trial of Innovative Glioblastoma Therapy (INSIGhT) trial, an adaptive platform trial designed to efficiently test experimental agents.

METHODS

Adults with newly diagnosed MGMT-unmethylated glioblastoma, with genomic data available, are eligible for this ongoing trial. Patients are adaptively randomized to one of several experimental arms or the control arm: standard radiotherapy with concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide. The primary endpoint is overall survival (OS). Patients randomized to CC-115 (10mg po BID) received it concurrently with radiotherapy and as adjuvant monotherapy. As the first in-human use of CC-115 with radiation, a safety lead-in 3 + 3 design was used.

RESULTS

Twelve patients were randomized to CC-115; seven patients had possible treatment-related CTCAE grade &gt; 3 toxicity, including four pre-specified dose-limiting toxicities: liver function abnormality (n=1), hyperlipidemia (n=1), lipase elevation (n=1) and cerebral edema (n=1). There was no significant difference in progression-free survival (PFS, median 4.2 months [CC-115] vs. 5.2 months, p=0.9) or OS (median 10.1 months [CC-115] vs. 14.5 months, p=0.9) compared to the 50 patients randomized to the control arm. Based on early PFS results, randomization probability to CC-115 decreased from 25% to &lt; 10% at time of the trial arm closure.

CONCLUSION

Concurrent and adjuvant CC-115 was associated with toxicity and failed to improve PFS or OS. The INSIGhT trial design allowed for more efficient testing of CC-115, decreasing patients and resources allocated to a therapy that was discontinued due to concerns about toxicity and unfavorable risk-to-benefit ratio.

CTNI-12. PRELIMINARY RESULTS OF THE ABEMACICLIB ARM IN THE INDIVIDUALIZED SCREENING TRIAL OF INNOVATIVE GLIOBLASTOMA THERAPY (INSIGHT): A PHASE II PLATFORM TRIAL USING BAYESIAN ADAPTIVE RANDOMIZATION

BACKGROUND

The cyclin D-CDK4/6-Rb pathway is activated in most glioblastomas. Abemaciclib is a potent CDK4/6 inhibitor with good brain penetration approved for ER/PR/HER2- breast cancer. In order to efficiently evaluate the potential impact of abemaciclib on overall survival (OS) in newly diagnosed glioblastoma and to simultaneously develop information regarding potential genomic biomarker associations, abemaciclib was included as an arm on the Individualized Screening Trial of Innovative Glioblastoma Therapy (INSIGhT) trial. INSIGhT is a phase II platform trial using response adaptive randomization and deep genomic profiling to more efficiently test experimental agents in MGMT unmethylated glioblastoma and potentially accelerate identification of novel therapies for phase III testing. Initial randomization was equal between abemaciclib, control, and two other experimental arms but subsequent randomization was adapted based on efficacy as determined by progression-free survival (PFS). Ineffective arms were discontinued and new arms added by protocol amendment. We report preliminary results for the abemaciclib arm which has completed accrual.

METHODS

Patients with newly diagnosed MGMT-unmethylated glioblastoma were randomized to receive either radiotherapy with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide at standard doses or standard radiochemotherapy followed by adjuvant abemaciclib (150–200 mg orally BID) without temozolomide. Treatment continued until progression or development of unacceptable toxicities. The primary endpoint was OS. Association between abemaciclib efficacy and cyclin D-CDK4/6-Rb pathway genomic alterations was also investigated.

RESULTS

There were 123 patients (50 control; 73 treated with abemaciclib). Abemaciclib was generally well-tolerated with no new toxicity signals identified. PFS was significantly longer (p=0.03, logrank test) with abemaciclib (median 6.31 months 95% CI [5.29, 8.18]) compared to the control arm (5.16 months 95% CI [4.37, 6.28]). 28/50 control and 36/73 abemaciclib patients remain alive.

CONCLUSION

Preliminary analysis suggests that abemaciclib increases PFS compared to control. Updated toxicity, PFS and survival data and potential genomic biomarker associations will be presented.

NCOG-06. PILOT STUDY OF NEUROCOGNITIVE DECLINE IN MALIGNANT GLIOMA PATIENTS TREATED WITH CHEMORADIATION AND ADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY

The majority of glioma patients experience declines in neurocognitive function (NCF), presumably due to tumor and treatment effects. We sought to understand the natural history of this decline in grade III and grade IV patients. A condensed battery of cognitive tests (HTLV, COWAT, GPT, TMT, and BTA) was administered at three time points: prior (T0) and after (T1) chemoradiation, and during adjuvant chemotherapy (T2). 31 patients were enrolled of which 25, 9 grade III and 16 grade IV, were analyzed. Although our N was too small for statistically significant results, we observed potentially meaningful clinical trends. Changes in HTLV, TMT, and COWAT scores among grade III patients displayed a pattern different from that of grade IV, with a steep decline seen after chemoradiation (T0-T1) followed by improvement several months later (T1-T2), despite ongoing chemotherapy. Grade IV patients, in contrast, showed minimal decline in scores (little change in score between T0-T1 and between T1-T2), perhaps highlighting that NCF is more impacted by disease rather than treatment. We tried to identify a subset of patients who seemed more susceptible to NCF decline. Examination of key clinical features showed that less than gross total resection and less than 4 year degree education level trended to associate with steeper NCF decline (only 40% of those experiencing steep declines in multiple domains had more than 4 yr degree, versus 60% of those with moderate or no decline). This pilot study highlights that assessing neurocognitive function routinely in clinical practice is feasible in a rural academic hospital. Based on patterns of changes in NCF, it appears that grade III and grade IV gliomas are distinct tumor subtypes with respect to NCF decline. Level of education may be a useful biomarker to identify those patients most at risk for neurocognitive decline after treatment.

ACTR-47. PHASE-III TRIAL OF STANDARD CHEMOTHERAPY VS. CHEMOTHERAPY GUIDED BY CANCER STEM CELL TEST IN RECURRENT GLIOBLASTOMA (NCT03632135)

Stupp treatment protocol for patients with glioblastoma (GBM) has improved the median overall survival to 14.6 months. However, no investigations have defined effective strategies against recurrence and the prognosis of recurrent GBM patients remains poor. Personalized medicine with assay-guided treatment targeting chemotherapy resistant cancer stem cells (CSCs) alongside the bulk tumor cells is a new paradigm in cancer treatment that may result in improved patient’s outcome. We are using ChemoID, a CLIA and CAP certified CSC cytotoxicity assay for predicting response to chemotherapeutic agents. Our prospective analysis of 61 GBM patients demonstrated that ChemoID-guided treatment significantly improved tumor response. For every 5% increase in cell kill of CSCs by assay-guided chemotherapy, 12-month patient response (non-recurrence of cancer) increased 2.5-fold, OR=2.3 (p=0.01). We also found that median recurrence time was 20-months versus 3-months for patients with a positive (>40% cell kill) CSC test versus negative, whereas median recurrence time was 13-months versus 4-months for patients with a positive (>55% cell kill) bulk test versus negative. We are conducting a multi-institutional phase-III clinical trial (NCT03632135) to determine the clinical validity of the ChemoID assay as a predictor of clinical response in recurrent GBM. The study has been designed as a parallel group controlled clinical trial and the participants are randomized to either standard of care chemotherapy chosen by the physician or ChemoID-guided therapy. Response to therapy will be measured by MRI imaging using RANO criteria. Primary endpoint of median overall survival (OS) and secondary endpoints of OS at 6, 9, and 12 months, median progression free survival (PFS), PFS at 4, 6, 9, and 12 months, objective tumor response, time to recurrence, and quality of life will be measured. Trial is open and currently 22 subjects have been enrolled. Interim analysis of the trial will be conducted in approximately 12 months.

Abstract LB-347: Ang-2/VEGF bispecific antibody reprograms macrophages and resident microglia to anti-tumor phenotype and prolongs glioblastoma survival

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to enhance the efficacy of anti-VEGF therapy in glioblastoma (GBM) through additional inhibition of Angiopoietin-2 (Ang-2), a potential mediator of resistance to antiangiogenic therapy using VEGF inhibition.

INTRODUCTION: Glioblastoma (GBM) is a uniformly lethal primary brain tumor affecting more than 12.000 patients every year in the US alone. The standard therapy regimen for this highly angiogenic tumor entity comprises maximal safe resection and chemoradiation with temozolomide. The addition of antiangiogenic (anti-VEGF) therapy to the standard of care regimen improved progression-free survival, but failed to improve overall survival of GBM patients. Preclinical and clinical data suggest that resistance to anti-VEGF therapy in GBM is mediated by Ang-2, making this pathway a potential target.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We tested the effect of dual Ang-2/VEGF blockade with A2V on mouse survival using a syngeneic (Gl261) model and a human xenograft (MGG8) model, compared to anti-VEGF antibody therapy (B20). In addition, we used blood-based Gaussian Luciferase (GLUC) assays, immunohistochemistry and flow cytometry to measure changes in tumor growth, microvessel density (MVD), and immune microenvironment, respectively.

RESULTS: Gl261 tumors have a highly abnormal tumor vasculature. In this model, treatment with A2V reduced MVD compared to B20. The decrease in MVD was due to a reduction in pericyte-low tumor vessels, while pericyte-high vessels were unaffected. These vascular changes were accompanied by reduced tumor burden and enhanced survival.

Interestingly, in the MGG8 tumors, which have a vasculature similar to the normal brain, we detected no change in MVD after A2V treatment. Nevertheless, we found a reduced tumor burden and prolonged animal survival in the MGG8 model.

Since vascular normalization may impact immune cell infiltration and function in tumors, we next evaluated these cell populations. We found that A2V therapy reduced pro-tumor M2 polarization of macrophages and microglia and reprogrammed these cells toward the M1 phenotype in both the Gl261 and MGG8 models. Collectively, our data indicate that therapy-induced anti-tumor immunity is mediated by M1-type macrophages but not by T-cell infiltration or function.

CONCLUSION: Dual Ang-2/VEGF therapy with A2V reprogrammed macrophages and microglia from pro-tumor M2 toward the anti-tumor M1 phenotype in two GBM models, in addition to normalizing vasculature in tumors with abnormal vessels. These data indicate that dual anti-angiogenic therapy has the potential to overcome resistance to anti-VEGF therapy and confer clinical benefits in GBM patients through vascular and immuno-modulatory effects.

Citation Format: Jonas Kloepper, Lars Riedemann, Zohreh Amoozgar, Giorgio Seano, Katharina H. Susek, Veronica Yu, Nisha Dalvie, Robin L. Amelung, Meenal Datta, Jonathan W. Song, Vasileios Askoxylakis, Jennie W. Taylor, Christine Lu-Emerson, Ana Batista, Nathaniel D. Kirkpatrick, Keehoon Jung, Matija Snuderl, Alona Muzikansky, Kay G. Stubenrauch, Oliver Krieter, Hiroaki Wakimoto, Lei Xu, Lance L. Munn, Dan G. Duda, Dai Fukumura, Tracy T. Batchelor, Rakesh K. Jain. Ang-2/VEGF bispecific antibody reprograms macrophages and resident microglia to anti-tumor phenotype and prolongs glioblastoma survival. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 107th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2016 Apr 16-20; New Orleans, LA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(14 Suppl):Abstract nr LB-347.

Ang-2/VEGF bispecific antibody reprograms macrophages and resident microglia to anti-tumor phenotype and prolongs glioblastoma survival

Inhibition of the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) pathway has failed to improve overall survival of patients with glioblastoma (GBM). We previously showed that angiopoietin-2 (Ang-2) overexpression compromised the benefit from anti-VEGF therapy in a preclinical GBM model. Here we investigated whether dual Ang-2/VEGF inhibition could overcome resistance to anti-VEGF treatment. We treated mice bearing orthotopic syngeneic (Gl261) GBMs or human (MGG8) GBM xenografts with antibodies inhibiting VEGF (B20), or Ang-2/VEGF (CrossMab, A2V). We examined the effects of treatment on the tumor vasculature, immune cell populations, tumor growth, and survival in both the Gl261 and MGG8 tumor models. We found that in the Gl261 model, which displays a highly abnormal tumor vasculature, A2V decreased vessel density, delayed tumor growth, and prolonged survival compared with B20. In the MGG8 model, which displays a low degree of vessel abnormality, A2V induced no significant changes in the tumor vasculature but still prolonged survival. In both the Gl261 and MGG8 models A2V reprogrammed protumor M2 macrophages toward the antitumor M1 phenotype. Our findings indicate that A2V may prolong survival in mice with GBM by reprogramming the tumor immune microenvironment and delaying tumor growth.

Lessons from anti-vascular endothelial growth factor and anti-vascular endothelial growth factor receptor trials in patients with glioblastoma

Treatment of glioblastoma (GBM), the most common primary malignant brain tumor in adults, remains a significant unmet need in oncology. Historically, cytotoxic treatments provided little durable benefit, and tumors recurred within several months. This has spurred a substantial research effort to establish more effective therapies for both newly diagnosed and recurrent GBM. In this context, antiangiogenic therapy emerged as a promising treatment strategy because GBMs are highly vascular tumors. In particular, GBMs overexpress vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), a proangiogenic cytokine. Indeed, many studies have demonstrated promising radiographic response rates, delayed tumor progression, and a relatively safe profile for anti-VEGF agents. However, randomized phase III trials conducted to date have failed to show an overall survival benefit for antiangiogenic agents alone or in combination with chemoradiotherapy. These results indicate that antiangiogenic agents may not be beneficial in unselected populations of patients with GBM. Unfortunately, biomarker development has lagged behind in the process of drug development, and no validated biomarker exists for patient stratification. However, hypothesis-generating data from phase II trials that reveal an association between increased perfusion and/or oxygenation (ie, consequences of vascular normalization) and survival suggest that early imaging biomarkers could help identify the subset of patients who most likely will benefit from anti-VEGF agents. In this article, we discuss the lessons learned from the trials conducted to date and how we could potentially use recent advances in GBM biology and imaging to improve outcomes of patients with GBM who receive antiangiogenic therapy.

Increase in tumor-associated macrophages after antiangiogenic therapy is associated with poor survival among patients with recurrent glioblastoma

Antiangiogenic therapy is associated with increased radiographic responses in glioblastomas, but tumors invariably recur. Because tumor-associated macrophages have been shown to mediate escape from antiangiogenic therapy in preclinical models, we examined the role of macrophages in patients with recurrent glioblastoma. We compared autopsy brain specimens from 20 patients with recurrent glioblastoma who received antiangiogenic treatment and chemoradiation with 8 patients who received chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy without antiangiogenic therapy or no treatment. Tumor-associated macrophages were morphologically and phenotypically analyzed using flow cytometry and immunohistochemistry for CD68, CD14, CD163, and CD11b expression. Flow cytometry showed an increase in macrophages in the antiangiogenic-treated patients. Immunohistochemical analysis demonstrated an increase in CD68+ macrophages in the tumor bulk (P < .01) and infiltrative areas (P = .02) in antiangiogenic-treated patients. We also observed an increase in CD11b+ cells in the tumor bulk (P < .01) and an increase in CD163+ macrophages in infiltrative tumor (P = .02). Of note, an increased number of CD11b+ cells in bulk and infiltrative tumors (P = .05 and P = .05, respectively) correlated with poor overall survival among patients who first received antiangiogenic therapy at recurrence. In summary, recurrent glioblastomas showed an increased infiltration in myeloid populations in the tumor bulk and in the infiltrative regions after antiangiogenic therapy. Higher numbers of CD11b+ cells correlated with poor survival among these patients. These data suggest that tumor-associated macrophages may participate in escape from antiangiogenic therapy and may represent a potential biomarker of resistance and a potential therapeutic target in recurrent glioblastoma.

Abstract LB-339: Increase in tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) after antiangiogenic therapy is associated with poor survival in recurrent glioblastoma (GBM) patients

Antiangiogenic therapy is associated with increased radiographic responses in glioblastomas (GBMs), but tumors invariably recur. Because tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) have been shown to mediate escape from antiangiogenic therapy in preclinical models, we examined the role of TAMs in recurrent glioblastoma (rGBM) patients. We compared autopsy brain specimens from 20 rGBM patients who received antiangiogenic treatment and chemoradiation (AAT+) to 8 patients who received chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy without antiangiogenic therapy, or no treatment (AAT-). TAMs were morphologically and phenotypically analyzed using flow cytometry and immunohistochemistry (IHC) for CD68, CD14, CD163, and CD11b expression. Flow cytometry showed an increase in TAMs in the AAT+ patients. IHC analysis demonstrated an increase in CD68+ TAMs in the tumor bulk (p&lt;0.01) and infiltrative areas (p=0.02) in AAT+ patients. We also observed an increase in CD11b+ cells in the tumor bulk (p&lt;0.01) and an increase in CD163+ TAMs in infiltrative tumor (p=0.02). Of note, an increased number of CD11b+ cells in bulk and infiltrative tumor (p=0.05 and p=0.05, respectively) correlated with poor overall survival in patients who first received antiangiogenic therapy at recurrence. In summary, rGBMs showed an increased infiltration in myeloid populations in the tumor bulk and in the infiltrative regions after antiangiogenic therapy. Higher numbers of CD11b+ cells correlated with poor survival in rGBM patients. These data suggest that TAMs may participate in escape from antiangiogenic therapy and may represent a potential biomarker of resistance and a potential therapeutic target in rGBM.

Citation Format: Christine Lu-Emerson, Matija Snuderl, Nathaniel D. Kirkpatrick, Jermaine Goveia, Jennie Taylor, Christian Davidson, Yuhui Huang, Lars Riedemann, S. Percy Ivy, G. Dan Duda, Marek Ancukiewicz3, Scott R. Plotkin, Andrew Chi, Elizabeth R. Gerstner, April F. Eichler, Jorg Dietrich, Anat O. Stemmer-Rachamimov, Tracy T. Batchelor, Rakesh K. Jain. Increase in tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) after antiangiogenic therapy is associated with poor survival in recurrent glioblastoma (GBM) patients. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 104th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2013 Apr 6-10; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2013;73(8 Suppl):Abstract nr LB-339. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2013-LB-339

Brain metastases

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Brain metastases are the most common neurologic complication related to systemic cancer. With continued improvements in systemic treatment, the incidence is expected to increase. This article reviews the clinical presentation, pathophysiology, prognostic factors, and treatment of metastatic brain tumors.

RECENT FINDINGS

Brain metastases from systemic cancer are up to 10 times more common than primary malignant brain tumors and are a significant burden in the management of patients with advanced cancer. Common presenting symptoms include headache, focal weakness or numbness, mental status change, and seizure. Management and treatment of metastatic brain tumors is complex and dependent on several factors, including age, performance status, number of metastases at presentation, and status of systemic disease. At the time of diagnosis, most patients have more than one brain metastasis, and treatment has traditionally consisted of whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT). For those patients with single brain metastases, aggressive local treatment with surgery or stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) combined with WBRT has been shown to improve survival and neurologic outcomes compared with WBRT alone. In patients with a limited number of brain metastases, SRS alone is being increasingly explored as a treatment option that spares the upfront toxicity of WBRT. Currently, the role of chemotherapy is limited to experimental settings and salvage after radiation therapy.

SUMMARY

Patients with brain metastases have complex needs and require a multidisciplinary approach in order to optimize intracranial disease control while maximizing neurologic function and quality of life. Patients with multiple metastases, uncontrolled systemic disease, and poor functional status are typically treated with WBRT alone, whereas surgery and SRS may be used for additional local control in a subset of patients with fewer tumors and good functional status. The incorporation of neuropsychological outcomes, neurologic function, and quality of life as end points in future studies will offer further guidance for providing comprehensive care to patients with metastatic brain tumors.

Effect of antiangiogenic therapy on tumor-associated macrophages in recurrent glioblastoma

2010

Background: Antiangiogenic therapy is associated with increased radiographic responses in glioblastoma (GBM), but tumors invariably recur. Tumor associated macrophages (TAMs) have been proposed as a mechanism of resistance to anti-angiogenic therapy in preclinical models. To examine the role of TAMs in recurrent GBM, we analyzed autopsy specimens from patients with or without history of antiangiogenic therapy. Methods: We compared autopsy brain specimens from 17 recurrent GBM patients who received anti-angiogenic treatment and chemoradiation (AAT+) to 7 patients who received chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy without anti-angiogenic therapy, or no treatment (AAT-). TAMs were morphologically and phenotypically identified with flow cytometry and immunohistochemistry (IHC) with CD68, CD11b, CD14, and CD163 markers. All specimens were obtained from the Department of Pathology at Massachusetts General Hospital and clinical information gained through review of the patients’ records. Results: Using flow cytometry, we observed an increase in CD11b+CD14+ cells in the AAT+ patients compared to AAT- patients. Using IHC analysis, we observed a significant increase in CD68+ macrophages in the tumor bulk (p<0.01) and infiltrative areas (p<0.05) in AAT+ versus AAT- patients. We also observed a significant increase in CD11b+ myeloid cells in the tumor bulk (p<0.01) and a significant increase in CD163+ cells in the infiltrative areas (p<0.05) in the AAT+ group. Finally, we noted a trend toward an increase in CD163+ cells in the tumor bulk (p=0.087) in the AAT+ versus the AAT- patients. Conclusions: Patients with recurrent GBM after antiangiogenic therapy showed a significant increase in CD68+ TAMs and in CD11b+ cells in the tumor bulk. Additionally, antiangiogenic treatment induced an increase in CD68+ and CD163+ TAMs in the infiltrative region. These data indicate that TAMs may participate in escape from antiangiogenic therapy and may represent a future therapeutic target in recurrent GBM.

Lethal giant cell arteritis with multiple ischemic strokes despite aggressive immunosuppressive therapy

Two patients with giant cell arteritis (GCA) had a malignant course despite aggressive immunosuppressive therapy. A 63-year-old woman presented with symptoms of headache, jaw claudication, scalp paresthesia, and visual disturbances. A temporal artery biopsy showed GCA. While on prednisone, she suffered ischemic strokes, and serial cerebral angiograms demonstrated bilateral, severe and progressive narrowing of distal vertebral and internal carotid arteries. Despite escalating immunosuppressive therapies, she suffered more infarcts and eventually died. Postmortem examination of arteries showed no active inflammation. A 65-year-old man presented with extrapyramidal symptoms though no symptoms typical of GCA. Imaging showed multiple ischemic strokes. Because serial angiograms demonstrated findings similar to the first patient, he underwent temporal artery biopsy that showed GCA. He died 7 months after his presentation with complications of aggressive immunosuppressive therapy. These two patients confirm that GCA can follow a lethal course despite escalating immunosuppressive therapies. Our two patients were unique in that eventually both anterior and posterior circulations were involved bilaterally in a characteristic location where the arteries penetrate the dura. This pattern should always raise the possibility of GCA and, if confirmed, should prompt aggressive immunosuppressive therapy. The dismal outcomes despite this approach may suggest a non-inflammatory arteriopathy, as seen on necropsy in one of our patients. Such an arteriopathy may require novel therapies to be considered for this severe variant of GCA.

Management of ischemic stroke: Part 2. The inpatient stay

BACKGROUND

Acute ischemic stroke is commonly encountered by the hospitalist. There have been dramatic changes in our ability to care for these patients both acutely and in secondary prevention. The Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations (JCAHO) primary stroke center certification has become progressively more important to institutions nationally and emphasizes many elements of the inpatient stay and discharge process.

PURPOSE

After admission, the focus changes to avoidance of complications and the appropriate initiation of allied therapies and secondary prevention.

DATA SOURCES

Primary trials, current guidelines.

CONCLUSIONS

The hospitalist is well-positioned to play a major role in the treatment of stroke patients as well as the systems work that aids in the management of this population.

Management of ischemic stroke: Part 1. Emergency room management

BACKGROUND

Acute ischemic stroke is commonly encountered by the hospitalist. There have been dramatic changes in our ability to care for these patients acutely. The Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations (JCAHO) primary stroke center certification has become progressively more important to institutions nationally and includes many aspects of initial evaluation and treatment.

PURPOSE

Acute treatment involves the rapid assimilation of patient characteristics, laboratory results, and imaging results. There are a growing number of potential acute therapies with a range of risk, benefit, necessary time windows, and specific eligibility criteria.

DATA SOURCES

Primary trials, current guidelines.

CONCLUSIONS

The hospitalist is well-positioned to play a major role in the treatment of stroke patients as well as the systems work that aids in the management of this population.

The Neurofibromatoses. Part 1: NF1

The neurofibromatoses, including neurofibromatosis 1 (NF1), neurofibromatosis 2 (NF2), and schwannomatosis, comprise a group of genetically distinct disorders of the nervous system unified by the predisposition to nerve sheath tumors. NF1 is the most common neurogenetic disorder, with a birth incidence of 1 in 3000. NF1 is inherited in auto-somal dominant fashion with full penetrance and variable expressivity. The hallmark lesion of NF1 is the neurofibroma, a benign tumor derived from the nerve sheath and composed of a mixture of proliferating Schwann cells, fibroblasts, mast cells, and pericytes. Other findings include gliomas, learning disability, vasculopathy, and bony abnormalities. Café au lait macules are typically the initial clinical manifestation of NF1 and tend to increase in size and number throughout childhood and puberty. Current treatment of patients with NF1 remains primarily surgical. Genetic counseling is essential for adult patients because molecular diagnostic testing can minimize the risk of transmission to children.

The neurofibromatoses. Part 2: NF2 and schwannomatosis

The neurofibromatoses, including neurofibromatosis 1 (NF1), neurofibromatosis 2 (NF2), and schwannomatosis, comprise a group of genetically distinct disorders of the nervous system that are unified by the predisposition to nerve sheath tumors. All 3 types of NF have tumor manifestations (consistent with tumor-suppressor status) and nontumor manifestations. In the second part of this 2-part series, the manifestations of NF2 and schwannomatosis are reviewed. NF2 is characterized by bilateral vestibular schwannomas, meningiomas, ependymomas, cataracts, and epiretinal membranes. The combination of complete hearing loss from vestibular schwannomas and blindness from bifacial weakness is a devastating potential outcome of NF2. Schwannomatosis is characterized by multiple nonvestibular, nonintradermal schwannomas and chronic pain. Recently, germline alterations in the SMARCB1/INI1 gene have been implicated in both familial and sporadic forms of this disorder. Neurologists play an important role in the diagnosis and management of the neurofibromatoses.