1
|
Richardson MT, Barry D, Steinberg JR, Thirunavu V, Strom DE, Holder K, Zhang N, Turner BE, Magnani CJ, Weeks BT, Young AMP, Lu CF, Wolgemuth TR, Laasiri N, Squires NA, Anderson JN, Karlan BY, Chan JK, Kapp DS, Roque DR, Salani R. Underrepresentation of racial and ethnic minority groups in gynecologic oncology: An analysis of over 250 trials. Gynecol Oncol 2024; 181:1-7. [PMID: 38096673 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2023.12.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2023] [Revised: 11/29/2023] [Accepted: 12/02/2023] [Indexed: 03/01/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To describe the participation of racial and ethnic minority groups (REMGs) in gynecologic oncology trials. METHODS Gynecologic oncology studies registered on ClinicalTrials.gov between 2007 and 2020 were identified. Trials with published results were analyzed based on reporting of race/ethnicity in relation to disease site and trial characteristics. Expected enrollment by race/ethnicity was calculated and compared to actual enrollment, adjusted for 2010 US Census population data. RESULTS 2146 gynecologic oncology trials were identified. Of published trials (n = 252), 99 (39.3%) reported race/ethnicity data. Recent trials were more likely to report these data (36% from 2007 to 2009; 51% 2013-2015; and 53% from 2016 to 2018, p = 0.01). Of all trials, ovarian cancer trials were least likely to report race/ethnicity data (32.1% vs 39.3%, p = 0.011). Population-adjusted under-enrollment for Blacks was 7-fold in ovarian cancer, Latinx 10-fold for ovarian and 6-fold in uterine cancer trials, Asians 2.5-fold in uterine cancer trials, and American Indian and Alaska Native individuals 6-fold in ovarian trials. Trials for most disease sites have enrolled more REMGs in recent years - REMGs made up 19.6% of trial participants in 2007-2009 compared to 38.1% in 2016-2018 (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION Less than half of trials that published results reported race/ethnicity data. Available data reveals that enrollment of REMGs is significantly below expected rates based on national census data. These disparities persisted even after additionally adjusting for population size. Despite improvement in recent years, additional recruitment of REMGs is needed to achieve more representative and equitable participation in gynecologic cancer clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael T Richardson
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America
| | - Danika Barry
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States of America
| | - Jecca R Steinberg
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States of America
| | - Vineeth Thirunavu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States of America
| | - Danielle E Strom
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States of America
| | - Kai Holder
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States of America
| | - Naixin Zhang
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, United States of America
| | - Brandon E Turner
- Harvard Radiation Oncology Program, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Christopher J Magnani
- Division of Urological Surgery, Brigham & Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Brannon T Weeks
- Brigham and Women's Hospital/Massachusetts General Hospital Integrated Residency Program in Obstetrics and Gynecology, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Anna Marie P Young
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States of America
| | - Connie F Lu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States of America
| | - Tierney R Wolgemuth
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States of America
| | - Nora Laasiri
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States of America
| | - Natalie A Squires
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, New York-Presbyterian/Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Jill N Anderson
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, New York-Presbyterian/Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Beth Y Karlan
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America
| | - John K Chan
- California Pacific / Palo Alto Medical Foundation / Sutter Research Institute, San Francisco, CA, United States of America
| | - Daniel S Kapp
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States of America
| | - Dario R Roque
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States of America
| | - Ritu Salani
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
D'Andrea V, Jason Qian Z, Yim K, Egan J, Magnani CJ, Feldman A, Salari K, Tewari A, Steele G, Mossanen M, Preston M, Chang SL, Clinton TN. Anticoagulation prophylaxis patterns following retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for testis cancer. Urol Oncol 2023; 41:489.e1-489.e6. [PMID: 37980224 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2023.10.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2023] [Revised: 09/14/2023] [Accepted: 10/17/2023] [Indexed: 11/20/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) is the standard of care for testicular cancer in various disease settings. Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) complications have been reported to occur in <1% of primary RPLND cases and up to 3% of postchemotherapy (PC-RPLND) cases. While prophylactic anticoagulation (AC) has been well-documented to reduce DVT rates in patients undergoing surgery in general, the benefit of prophylactic AC in RPLND has not been assessed. In this retrospective cohort study, we seek to address this unmet need by evaluating the rates and associated risk factors of DVT and pulmonary embolism (PE) with a national and institutional database, assess the changing patterns in DVT prophylaxis with postoperative AC following RPLND, and quantify the potential benefit of prophylactic AC in patients who have undergone RPLND using a risk-stratified approach. METHODS The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database was queried for patients who underwent RPLND during the 10-year period from 2011 to 2021. An institutional database was queried for all patients undergoing RPLND from 2013 to 2022. Patient characteristics and operative outcomes were compared between the NSQIP and the institutional database. The institutional database was stratified by prior oncologic treatment (i.e., primary RPLND vs. PC-RPLND) and outcomes were compared. Postoperative AC rate was determined and trended by year. The use of postoperative AC and PE events were stratified by clinical stage. The absolute risk reduction (ARR) of AC prophylaxis on PE events and the number needed to treat (NNT) with AC prophylaxis to prevent a single PE event was determined. RESULTS In total, the NSQIP database query resulted in 779 patients and our institutional database query resulted in 188 patients. The rate of DVT and PE was 1.2% and 0.5% vs. 2.1% and 1.6% in the NSQIP and institutional cohort, respectively. The rate of postoperative AC following RPLND in patients from the institutional database increased from 5% in 2013 to 43% in 2022 (P = 0.01). There were no statistically significant differences in complication rates, including bleeding events, chyle leaks, or hospital readmissions amongst patients who were prescribed AC at discharge and those who were not. No stage I patients developed PEs and no stage I patients were prescribed AC. The ARR for AC prophylaxis for development of PE was found to be 0.023 for the clinical stage II and stage III cohorts. The NNT to prevent a single PE with AC was 44 and 43 for the stage II and stage III cohorts, respectively. CONCLUSIONS AC appears beneficial with minimal risk of harm after RPLND, especially in patients with higher risk of developing DVT/PE, highlighting the safety and efficacy of this regimen. There was a significant increase in the rate of AC prophylaxis at discharge amongst patients undergoing RPLND in the institutional database from 2013 to 2022. A risk-stratified protocol of postoperative AC following RPLND appears reasonable, and further prospective trials are warranted to formally confirm this recommendation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vincent D'Andrea
- Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, Harvard Medical School, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Zhiyu Jason Qian
- Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, Harvard Medical School, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Kendrick Yim
- Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, Harvard Medical School, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Jillian Egan
- Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, Harvard Medical School, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Department of Urology, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Christopher J Magnani
- Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, Harvard Medical School, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Harvard Medical School, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Adam Feldman
- Department of Urology, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Keyan Salari
- Department of Urology, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Alok Tewari
- Harvard Medical School, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Graeme Steele
- Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, Harvard Medical School, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Harvard Medical School, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Matthew Mossanen
- Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, Harvard Medical School, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Harvard Medical School, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Mark Preston
- Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, Harvard Medical School, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Harvard Medical School, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Steven L Chang
- Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, Harvard Medical School, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Harvard Medical School, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Timothy N Clinton
- Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, Harvard Medical School, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Harvard Medical School, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Cai LZ, Patel AA, Thirunavu VM, Hug NF, Song S, Li J, Barghout RR, Magnani CJ, Turner BE, Steinberg JR, Lee GK. Characterizing Clinical Trials in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery: A Systematic Review of ClinicalTrials.gov From 2007 to 2020. Ann Plast Surg 2023; 90:S287-S294. [PMID: 37227408 DOI: 10.1097/sap.0000000000003227] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/26/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Clinical trials form the backbone of evidence-based medicine. ClinicalTrials.gov is the world's largest clinical trial registry, and the state of clinical trials in plastic and reconstructive surgery (PRS) within that database has not been comprehensively studied. To that end, we explored the distribution of therapeutic areas that are under investigation, impact of funding on study design and data reporting, and trends in research patterns of all PRS interventional clinical trials registered with ClinicalTrials.gov. METHODS Using the ClinicalTrials.gov database, we identified and extracted all clinical trials relevant to PRS that were submitted between 2007 and 2020. Studies were classified based on anatomic locations, therapeutic categories, and specialty topics. Cox proportional hazard was used to calculate adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) for early discontinuation and results reporting. RESULTS A total of 3224 trials that included 372,095 participants were identified. The PRS trials grew at an annual rate of 7.9%. The therapeutic classes most represented were wound healing (41.3%) and cosmetics (18.1%). Funding for PRS clinical trials is largely provided through academic institutions (72.7%), while industry and US government constituted a minority. Industry-funded studies were more likely to be discontinued early than those funded by academics (HR, 1.89) or government (HR, 1.92) and to be nonblinded and nonrandomized. Academic-funded studies were the least likely to report results data within 3 years of trial completion (odds ratio, 0.87). CONCLUSIONS A gulf exists in the representation of different PRS specialties among clinical trials. We highlight the role of funding source in trial design and data reporting to identify a potential source of financial waste and to stress the need for continued appropriate oversight.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lawrence Z Cai
- From the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Stanford Health Care, Palo Alto, CA
| | - Ashraf A Patel
- Divison of Plastic Surgery, University of Utah Hospitals & Clinics, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | | | | | - Siyou Song
- University of California San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, CA
| | | | | | | | - Brandon E Turner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Harvard Medical School, Cambridge, MA
| | - Jecca R Steinberg
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern Medicine, Chicago, IL
| | - Gordon K Lee
- From the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Stanford Health Care, Palo Alto, CA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Brewster RCL, Steinberg JR, Magnani CJ, Jackson J, Wong BO, Valikodath N, MacDonald J, Li A, Marsland P, Goodman SN, Schroeder A, Turner B. Race and Ethnicity Reporting and Representation in Pediatric Clinical Trials. Pediatrics 2023; 151:190837. [PMID: 36916197 DOI: 10.1542/peds.2022-058552] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/12/2022] [Indexed: 03/16/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Representative enrollment of racial and ethnic minoritized populations in biomedical research ensures the generalizability of results and equitable access to novel therapies. Previous studies on pediatric clinical trial diversity are limited to subsets of journals or disciplines. We aimed to evaluate race and ethnicity reporting and representation in all US pediatric clinical trials on ClinicalTrials.gov. METHODS We performed a cross-sectional study of US-based clinical trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov that enrolled participants aged <18 years old between October 2007 and March 2020. We used descriptive statistics, compound annual growth rates, and multivariable logistic regression for data analysis. Estimates of US population statistics and disease burden were calculated with the US Census, Kids' Inpatient Database, and National Survey of Children's Health. RESULTS Among 1183 trials encompassing 405 376 participants, race and ethnicity reporting significantly increased from 27% in 2007 to 87% in 2018 (P < .001). The median proportional enrollment of Asian American children was 0.6% (interquartile range [IQR], 0%-3.7%); American Indian, 0% (IQR, 0%-0%); Black, 12% (IQR, 2.9%-28.4%); Hispanic, 7.1% (IQR, 0%-18.6%); and white 66.4% (IQR, 41.5%-81.6%). Asian American, Black, and Hispanic participants were underrepresented relative to US population demographics. Compared with expected proportions based on disease prevalence and hospitalizations, Asian American and Hispanic participants were most consistently underrepresented across diagnoses. CONCLUSIONS While race and ethnicity reporting in pediatric clinical trials has improved, the representative enrollment of minoritized participants remains an ongoing challenge. Evidence-based and policy solutions are needed to address these disparities to advance biomedical innovation for all children.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan C L Brewster
- Department of General Pediatrics, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.,Department of General Pediatrics, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jecca R Steinberg
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | | | - Jasmyne Jackson
- Department of General Pediatrics, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.,Department of General Pediatrics, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Bonnie O Wong
- Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Nishma Valikodath
- Department of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Justin MacDonald
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Guthrie Robert Packer Hospital, Sayre, Pennsylvania
| | - Anna Li
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Florida, Gainsville, Florida
| | - Paula Marsland
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington, Washington
| | - Steven N Goodman
- Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Alan Schroeder
- Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Brandon Turner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Steinberg JR, Turner BE, DiTosto JD, Weeks BT, Young AMP, Lu CF, Wolgemuth T, Holder K, Laasiri N, Squires N, Zhang N, Richardson MT, Magnani CJ, Anderson JN, Roque DR, Yee LM. Race and Ethnicity Reporting and Representation in Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinical Trials and Publications From 2007-2020. JAMA Surg 2023; 158:181-190. [PMID: 36542396 PMCID: PMC9856739 DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2022.6600] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2022] [Accepted: 09/04/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Importance Clinical trials guide evidence-based obstetrics and gynecology (OB-GYN) but often enroll nonrepresentative participants. Objective To characterize race and ethnicity reporting and representation in US OB-GYN clinical trials and their subsequent publications and to analyze the association of subspecialty and funding with diverse representation. Design and Setting Cross-sectional analysis of all OB-GYN studies registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (2007-2020) and publications from PubMed and Google Scholar (2007-2021). Analyses included logistic regression controlling for year, subspecialty, phase, funding, and site number. Data from 332 417 studies were downloaded. Studies with a noninterventional design, with a registration date before October 1, 2007, without relevance to OB-GYN, with no reported results, and with no US-based study site were excluded. Exposures OB-GYN subspecialty and funder. Main Outcomes and Measures Reporting of race and ethnicity data and racial and ethnic representation (the proportion of enrollees of American Indian or Alaskan Native, Asian, Black, Latinx, or White identity and odds of representation above US Census estimates by race and ethnicity). Results Among trials with ClinicalTrials.gov results (1287 trials with 591 196 participants) and publications (1147 trials with 821 111 participants), 662 (50.9%) and 856 (74.6%) reported race and ethnicity data, respectively. Among publications, gynecology studies were significantly less likely to report race and ethnicity than obstetrics (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.54; 95% CI, 0.38-0.75). Reproductive endocrinology and infertility trials had the lowest odds of reporting race and ethnicity (aOR, 0.14; 95% CI, 0.07-0.27; reference category, obstetrics). Obstetrics and family planning demonstrated the most diverse clinical trial cohorts. Compared with obstetric trials, gynecologic oncology had the lowest odds of Black representation (ClinicalTrials.gov: aOR, 0.04; 95% CI, 0.02-0.09; publications: aOR, 0.06; 95% CI, 0.03-0.11) and Latinx representation (ClinicalTrials.gov: aOR, 0.05; 95% CI, 0.02-0.14; publications: aOR, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.10-0.48), followed by urogynecology and reproductive endocrinology and infertility. Urogynecology (ClinicalTrials.gov: aOR, 0.15; 95% CI, 0.05-0.39; publications: aOR, 0.24; 95% CI, 0.09-0.58) had the lowest odds of Asian representation. Conclusions and Relevance Race and ethnicity reporting and representation in OB-GYN trials are suboptimal. Obstetrics and family planning trials demonstrate improved representation is achievable. Nonetheless, all subspecialties should strive for more equitably representative research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Julia D. DiTosto
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Brannon T. Weeks
- Integrated Residency Program in Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital/Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston
| | - Anna Marie P. Young
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Connie F. Lu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Tierney Wolgemuth
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Kai Holder
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Nora Laasiri
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Natalie Squires
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, NewYork-Presbyterian/Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York
| | - Naixin Zhang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis
| | | | - Christopher J. Magnani
- Division of Urological Surgery, Brigham & Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jill N. Anderson
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, NewYork-Presbyterian/Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York
| | - Dario R. Roque
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Lynn M. Yee
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
DiTosto JD, Steinberg JR, Turner BE, Weeks BT, Young AMP, Lu CF, Wolgemuth T, Holder K, Laasiri N, Squires NA, Anderson JN, Zhang N, Richardson MT, Magnani CJ, Perry MF, Yee LM. How many US obstetrical trials reach publication? A cross-sectional analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov and PubMed from 2007 to 2019. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM 2022; 4:100696. [PMID: 35872356 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2022.100696] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2022] [Revised: 07/14/2022] [Accepted: 07/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Obstetrical clinical trials are the foundation of evidence-based medicine during pregnancy. As more obstetrical trials are conducted, understanding the publication characteristics of these trials is of utmost importance to advance obstetrical health. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to characterize the frequency of publication and trial characteristics associated with publication among obstetrical clinical trials in the United States. We additionally sought to examine time from trial completion to publication. STUDY DESIGN This was a cross-sectional analysis of completed obstetrical trials with an intervention design and at least 1 site in the United States registered to ClinicalTrials.gov from 2007 to 2019. Trial characteristics were cross-referenced with PubMed to determine publication status up to 2021 using the National Clinical Trial identification number. Bivariable analyses were conducted to determine trial characteristics associated with publication. Multivariable logistic regression models controlling for prespecified covariates were generated to estimate the relationship between funding, primary purpose, and therapeutic foci with publication. Additional exploratory analyses of other trial characteristics were conducted. Time to publication was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression models. RESULTS Of the 1879 obstetrical trials with registered completion, a total of 575 (30.6%) had at least 1 site in the United States, were completed before October 1, 2019, and were included in this analysis. Between October 2007 and October 2019, fewer than two-thirds (N=348, 60.5%) of trials reached publication. Annual rates of publication ranged from 46.4% in 2018 to 70.0% in 2007. No difference was observed in publication by funding, primary purpose, or therapeutic foci (all P>.05). Trials with characteristics indicating high trial quality-including randomized allocation scheme, ≥50 participants enrolled, ≥2 sites, and presence of a data safety monitoring committee-had increased odds of publication compared with those without such characteristics (all P<.05). For example, studies with randomized allocation of intervention had 2-fold greater odds of publication than nonrandomized studies (adjusted odds ratio, 2.09; 95% confidence interval, 1.30-3.37). Studies with ≥150 participants had nearly 8-fold odds of publication (adjusted odds ratio, 7.90; 95% confidence interval, 3.78-17.49) relative to studies with <50 participants. Temporal analysis demonstrated variability in time to publication among obstetrical trials, with a median time of 20.1 months after trial completion, and with most trials that reached publication having been published by 40 months. No difference was observed in time to publication by funding, primary purpose, or therapeutic foci (all P>.05). CONCLUSION Publication of obstetrical trials remains suboptimal, with significant differences observed between trials with indicators of high quality and those without. Most trials that reach publication are published within 2 years of registered completion on ClinicalTrials.gov.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia D DiTosto
- Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL (Ms DiTosto, Drs Steinberg, Young, Lu, and Wolgemuth, Ms Holder, and Drs Squires, Perry, and Yee)
| | - Jecca R Steinberg
- Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL (Ms DiTosto, Drs Steinberg, Young, Lu, and Wolgemuth, Ms Holder, and Drs Squires, Perry, and Yee)
| | - Brandon E Turner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA (Dr Turner)
| | - Brannon T Weeks
- Integrated Residency Program in Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brigham and Women's Hospital-Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA (Dr Weeks)
| | - Anna Marie P Young
- Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL (Ms DiTosto, Drs Steinberg, Young, Lu, and Wolgemuth, Ms Holder, and Drs Squires, Perry, and Yee)
| | - Connie F Lu
- Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL (Ms DiTosto, Drs Steinberg, Young, Lu, and Wolgemuth, Ms Holder, and Drs Squires, Perry, and Yee)
| | - Tierney Wolgemuth
- Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL (Ms DiTosto, Drs Steinberg, Young, Lu, and Wolgemuth, Ms Holder, and Drs Squires, Perry, and Yee)
| | - Kai Holder
- Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL (Ms DiTosto, Drs Steinberg, Young, Lu, and Wolgemuth, Ms Holder, and Drs Squires, Perry, and Yee)
| | - Nora Laasiri
- Northwestern University Physician Assistant Program, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL (Ms Laasiri)
| | - Natalie A Squires
- Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL (Ms DiTosto, Drs Steinberg, Young, Lu, and Wolgemuth, Ms Holder, and Drs Squires, Perry, and Yee)
| | - Jill N Anderson
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA (Dr Anderson)
| | - Naixin Zhang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN (Dr Zhang)
| | - Michael T Richardson
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA (Dr Richardson)
| | - Christopher J Magnani
- Division of Urological Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (Dr Magnani)
| | - Madeline F Perry
- Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL (Ms DiTosto, Drs Steinberg, Young, Lu, and Wolgemuth, Ms Holder, and Drs Squires, Perry, and Yee)
| | - Lynn M Yee
- Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL (Ms DiTosto, Drs Steinberg, Young, Lu, and Wolgemuth, Ms Holder, and Drs Squires, Perry, and Yee).
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Bozkurt S, Magnani CJ, Seneviratne MG, Brooks JD, Hernandez-Boussard T. Expanding the Secondary Use of Prostate Cancer Real World Data: Automated Classifiers for Clinical and Pathological Stage. Front Digit Health 2022; 4:793316. [PMID: 35721793 PMCID: PMC9201076 DOI: 10.3389/fdgth.2022.793316] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2021] [Accepted: 05/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Explicit documentation of stage is an endorsed quality metric by the National Quality Forum. Clinical and pathological cancer staging is inconsistently recorded within clinical narratives but can be derived from text in the Electronic Health Record (EHR). To address this need, we developed a Natural Language Processing (NLP) solution for extraction of clinical and pathological TNM stages from the clinical notes in prostate cancer patients. Methods Data for patients diagnosed with prostate cancer between 2010 and 2018 were collected from a tertiary care academic healthcare system's EHR records in the United States. This system is linked to the California Cancer Registry, and contains data on diagnosis, histology, cancer stage, treatment and outcomes. A randomly selected sample of patients were manually annotated for stage to establish the ground truth for training and validating the NLP methods. For each patient, a vector representation of clinical text (written in English) was used to train a machine learning model alongside a rule-based model and compared with the ground truth. Results A total of 5,461 prostate cancer patients were identified in the clinical data warehouse and over 30% were missing stage information. Thirty-three to thirty-six percent of patients were missing a clinical stage and the models accurately imputed the stage in 21–32% of cases. Twenty-one percent had a missing pathological stage and using NLP 71% of missing T stages and 56% of missing N stages were imputed. For both clinical and pathological T and N stages, the rule-based NLP approach out-performed the ML approach with a minimum F1 score of 0.71 and 0.40, respectively. For clinical M stage the ML approach out-performed the rule-based model with a minimum F1 score of 0.79 and 0.88, respectively. Conclusions We developed an NLP pipeline to successfully extract clinical and pathological staging information from clinical narratives. Our results can serve as a proof of concept for using NLP to augment clinical and pathological stage reporting in cancer registries and EHRs to enhance the secondary use of these data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Selen Bozkurt
- Department of Medicine (Biomedical Informatics), Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States
| | | | - Martin G. Seneviratne
- Department of Medicine (Biomedical Informatics), Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States
| | - James D. Brooks
- School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States
| | - Tina Hernandez-Boussard
- Department of Medicine (Biomedical Informatics), Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States
- Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States
- *Correspondence: Tina Hernandez-Boussard
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Brewster R, Wong M, Magnani CJ, Gunningham H, Hoffer M, Showalter S, Tran K, Steinberg JR, Turner BE, Goodman SN, Schroeder AR. Early Discontinuation, Results Reporting, and Publication of Pediatric Clinical Trials. Pediatrics 2022; 149:185586. [PMID: 35314864 DOI: 10.1542/peds.2021-052557] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/26/2022] [Indexed: 01/31/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Unique ethical, epidemiological, and economic factors are barriers to performing research in children. The landscape of pediatric clinical trials, including drivers of completion and timely dissemination of results, is not well understood. We aimed to characterize the prevalence of and factors associated with early discontinuation, results reporting, and publication of pediatric clinical trials registered at ClinicalTrials.gov. METHODS Cross-sectional analysis of clinical trials enrolling participants <18 years old registered at ClinicalTrials.gov from October 2007 to March 2020. Multivariable logistic regressions were performed to assess the association between trial characteristics and primary outcomes. Publication data were obtained through PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, Embase, and Scopus. RESULTS Overall, 11.1% trials were stopped early, with recruitment failure being the predominant reason for discontinuation. Only 23.5% of completed trials reported results, and 38.8% were published within 3 years of completion. Rates of discontinuation and publication significantly improved over the study period. Among funding sources, government-sponsored trials (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.72; 95% CI, 0.47-0.97) and academic trials (aOR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.50-0.82) had lower odds of discontinuation compared with industry trials and were more likely to be published (government: aOR, 1.94 [95% CI, 1.52-2.48] academic: aOR, 1.61 [95% CI, 1.35-1.92). Academic trial investigators were the least likely to report results (aOR, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.31-0.52). CONCLUSIONS Early discontinuation and nonreporting/nonpublication of findings remain common in registered pediatric clinical trials and were associated with funding source and other trial features. Targeted efforts are needed to support trial completion and timely results dissemination toward strengthening evidence-based pediatric medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan Brewster
- Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Melissa Wong
- University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington
| | - Christopher J Magnani
- Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | | | - Madison Hoffer
- University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington
| | - Samuel Showalter
- University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Katherine Tran
- University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Jecca R Steinberg
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Brandon E Turner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Steven N Goodman
- Meta-Research Innovation Center at Stanford, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Alan R Schroeder
- Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Steinberg JR, Turner BE, DiTosto JD, Young AMP, Magnani CJ, Zhang N, Lu CF, Wolgemuth T, Laasiri N, Holder K, Weeks BT, Richardson MT, Anderson JN, Squires N, Yee LM. Race in US obstetric clinical trials: An analysis of reporting and representation from 2007-2020. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.11.761] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
|
10
|
Steinberg JR, Magnani CJ, Turner BE, Weeks BT, Marie P Young A, Lu C, Zhang N, Richardson MT, Mekonnen ZK, Redman T, Adetunji M, Martin SA, Anderson JN, Chan KS, Fitzgerald AC, Milad MP. CLINICAL TRIAL OUTCOMES IN REI AND OTHER GYNECOLOGY SUBSPECIALTIES: AN ANALYSIS OF EARLY DISCONTINUATION, RESULTS REPORTING AND PUBLICATION BETWEEN 2007-2020. Fertil Steril 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.07.218] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
11
|
Turner BE, Magnani CJ, Frolov A, Weeks BT, Steinberg JR, Huda N, Shah LM, Zuroff L, Gu BJ, Rasmussen H, Edwards JG, Save AV, Shen M, Ren M, Bryant BR, Ma Q, Feng AY, Liang AC, Santini VE. Neurology trial registrations on ClinicalTrials.gov between 2007 and 2018: A cross-sectional analysis of characteristics, early discontinuation, and results reporting. J Neurol Sci 2021; 428:117579. [PMID: 34332371 DOI: 10.1016/j.jns.2021.117579] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2021] [Accepted: 07/12/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Increasing neurological disease burden and advancing treatment options require clinical trials to expand the evidence base of clinical care. We aimed to characterize neurology clinical trials registered between October 2007 and April 2018 and identify features associated with early discontinuation and results reporting. METHODS We compared 16,994 neurology (9.4%) and 163,714 non-neurology comparison trials registered to ClinicalTrials.gov. Trials therapeutic focus within neurology was assigned via combination programmatic and manual review. We performed descriptive analyses of trial characteristics, cox regression of early discontinuation, and multivariable logistic regression for results reporting within 3 years of completion. RESULTS Most neurology trials were academic-funded (58.5%) followed by industry (31.9%) and US-government (9.6%). Neurology trials focused more on treatment than prevention compared to non-neurology studies. Of neurology trials, 11.3% discontinued early, and 32.2% of completed trials reported results by April 30, 2018. In multivariable analysis accounting for time-to-event, neurology trials were at lower risk of discontinuation than non-neurology trials (adjusted hazard 0.83, p < 0.0001). Both academic and government-funded trials had greater risk of discontinuation than industry (adjusted hazard 0.57 and 0.46, respectively). Among completed trials, government-funded studies (adjusted odds ratio 2.12, p < 0.0001) had highest odds of results reporting while academic trials reported less (adjusted odds ratio 0.51, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS Funding source is associated with trial characteristics and outcomes in neurology. Improvements in trial completion and timely dissemination of results remain urgent goals for the field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brandon E Turner
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States of America; Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America.
| | - Christopher J Magnani
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States of America; Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Alexander Frolov
- Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Brannon T Weeks
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States of America
| | - Jecca R Steinberg
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States of America; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States of America
| | - Naureen Huda
- Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States of America
| | - Lochan M Shah
- Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States of America
| | - Leah Zuroff
- Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America
| | - Ben Jiahe Gu
- Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America
| | - Hannah Rasmussen
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States of America
| | - Jeffrey G Edwards
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States of America
| | - Akshay V Save
- Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Max Shen
- Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Mark Ren
- Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States of America
| | - Barry R Bryant
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States of America
| | - Qian Ma
- Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Austin Y Feng
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States of America
| | - Amy C Liang
- Highland Hospital Emergency Medicine, Oakland, CA, United States of America
| | - Veronica E Santini
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Steinberg JR, Turner BE, Weeks BT, Magnani CJ, Wong BO, Rodriguez F, Yee LM, Cullen MR. Analysis of Female Enrollment and Participant Sex by Burden of Disease in US Clinical Trials Between 2000 and 2020. JAMA Netw Open 2021; 4:e2113749. [PMID: 34143192 PMCID: PMC8214160 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.13749] [Citation(s) in RCA: 86] [Impact Index Per Article: 28.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Although female representation has increased in clinical trials, little is known about how clinical trial representation compares with burden of disease or is associated with clinical trial features, including disease category. OBJECTIVE To describe the rate of sex reporting (ie, the presence of clinical trial data according to sex), compare the female burden of disease with the female proportion of clinical trial enrollees, and investigate the associations of disease category and clinical trial features with the female proportion of clinical trial enrollees. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This cross-sectional study included descriptive analyses and logistic and generalized linear regression analyses with a logit link. Data were downloaded from the Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov database for all studies registered between March 1, 2000, and March 9, 2020. Enrollment was compared with data from the 2016 Global Burden of Disease database. Of 328 452 clinical trials, 70 095 were excluded because they had noninterventional designs, 167 936 because they had recruitment sites outside the US, 69 084 because they had no reported results, 1003 because they received primary funding from the US military, and 314 because they had unclear sex categories. A total of 20 020 interventional studies enrolling approximately 5.11 million participants met inclusion criteria and were divided into those with and without data on participant sex. EXPOSURES The primary exposure variable was clinical trial disease category. Secondary exposure variables included funding, study design, and study phase. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Sex reporting and female proportion of participants in clinical trials. RESULTS Among 20 020 clinical trials from 2000 to 2020, 19 866 studies (99.2%) reported sex, and 154 studies (0.8%) did not. Clinical trials in the fields of oncology (46% of disability-adjusted life-years [DALYs]; 43% of participants), neurology (56% of DALYs; 53% of participants), immunology (49% of DALYs; 46% of participants), and nephrology (45% of DALYs; 42% of participants) had the lowest female representation relative to corresponding DALYs. Male participants were underrepresented in 8 disease categories, with the greatest disparity in clinical trials of musculoskeletal disease and trauma (11.3% difference between representation and proportion of DALYs). Clinical trials of preventive interventions were associated with greater female enrollment (adjusted relative difference, 8.48%; 95% CI, 3.77%-13.00%). Clinical trials in cardiology (adjusted relative difference, -18.68%; 95% CI, -22.87% to -14.47%) and pediatrics (adjusted relative difference, -20.47%; 95% CI, -25.77% to -15.16%) had the greatest negative association with female enrollment. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this study, sex differences in clinical trials varied by clinical trial disease category, with male and female participants underrepresented in different medical fields. Although sex equity has progressed, these findings suggest that sex bias in clinical trials persists within medical fields, with negative consequences for the health of all individuals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jecca R. Steinberg
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Brandon E. Turner
- Harvard Radiation Oncology Program, Massachusetts General Hospital and the Joint Center for Radiation Therapy, Boston
| | - Brannon T. Weeks
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Christopher J. Magnani
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Bonnie O. Wong
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Fatima Rodriguez
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine and the Cardiovascular Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Lynn M. Yee
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Mark R. Cullen
- Center for Population Health Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Coquet J, Bievre N, Billaut V, Seneviratne M, Magnani CJ, Bozkurt S, Brooks JD, Hernandez-Boussard T. Assessment of a Clinical Trial-Derived Survival Model in Patients With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer. JAMA Netw Open 2021; 4:e2031730. [PMID: 33481032 PMCID: PMC7823224 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.31730] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) are considered the criterion standard for clinical evidence. Despite their many benefits, RCTs have limitations, such as costliness, that may reduce the generalizability of their findings among diverse populations and routine care settings. OBJECTIVE To assess the performance of an RCT-derived prognostic model that predicts survival among patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) when the model is applied to real-world data from electronic health records (EHRs). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS The RCT-trained model and patient data from the RCTs were obtained from the Dialogue for Reverse Engineering Assessments and Methods (DREAM) challenge for prostate cancer, which occurred from March 16 to July 27, 2015. This challenge included 4 phase 3 clinical trials of patients with metastatic CRPC. Real-world data were obtained from the EHRs of a tertiary care academic medical center that includes a comprehensive cancer center. In this study, the DREAM challenge RCT-trained model was applied to real-world data from January 1, 2008, to December 31, 2019; the model was then retrained using EHR data with optimized feature selection. Patients with metastatic CRPC were divided into RCT and EHR cohorts based on data source. Data were analyzed from March 23, 2018, to October 22, 2020. EXPOSURES Patients who received treatment for metastatic CRPC. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcome was the performance of an RCT-derived prognostic model that predicts survival among patients with metastatic CRPC when the model is applied to real-world data. Model performance was compared using 10-fold cross-validation according to time-dependent integrated area under the curve (iAUC) statistics. RESULTS Among 2113 participants with metastatic CRPC, 1600 participants were included in the RCT cohort, and 513 participants were included in the EHR cohort. The RCT cohort comprised a larger proportion of White participants (1390 patients [86.9%] vs 337 patients [65.7%]) and a smaller proportion of Hispanic participants (14 patients [0.9%] vs 42 patients [8.2%]), Asian participants (41 patients [2.6%] vs 88 patients [17.2%]), and participants older than 75 years (388 patients [24.3%] vs 191 patients [37.2%]) compared with the EHR cohort. Participants in the RCT cohort also had fewer comorbidities (mean [SD], 1.6 [1.8] comorbidities vs 2.5 [2.6] comorbidities, respectively) compared with those in the EHR cohort. Of the 101 variables used in the RCT-derived model, 10 were not available in the EHR data set, 3 of which were among the top 10 features in the DREAM challenge RCT model. The best-performing EHR-trained model included only 25 of the 101 variables included in the RCT-trained model. The performance of the RCT-trained and EHR-trained models was adequate in the EHR cohort (mean [SD] iAUC, 0.722 [0.118] and 0.762 [0.106], respectively); model optimization was associated with improved performance of the best-performing EHR model (mean [SD] iAUC, 0.792 [0.097]). The EHR-trained model classified 256 patients as having a high risk of mortality and 256 patients as having a low risk of mortality (hazard ratio, 2.7; 95% CI, 2.0-3.7; log-rank P < .001). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this study, although the RCT-trained models did not perform well when applied to real-world EHR data, retraining the models using real-world EHR data and optimizing variable selection was beneficial for model performance. As clinical evidence evolves to include more real-world data, both industry and academia will likely search for ways to balance model optimization with generalizability. This study provides a pragmatic approach to applying RCT-trained models to real-world data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jean Coquet
- Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Nicolas Bievre
- Department of Statistics, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Vincent Billaut
- Department of Statistics, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Martin Seneviratne
- Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
- Department of Biomedical Data Science, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | | | - Selen Bozkurt
- Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - James D. Brooks
- Department of Urology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
- Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Tina Hernandez-Boussard
- Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
- Department of Biomedical Data Science, Stanford University, Stanford, California
- Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Magnani CJ, Bievre N, Baker LC, Brooks JD, Blayney DW, Hernandez-Boussard T. Real-world Evidence to Estimate Prostate Cancer Costs for First-line Treatment or Active Surveillance. EUR UROL SUPPL 2020; 23:20-29. [PMID: 33367287 PMCID: PMC7751921 DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2020.11.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Prostate cancer is the most common cancer in men and second leading cause of cancer-related deaths. Changes in screening guidelines, adoption of active surveillance (AS), and implementation of high-cost technologies have changed treatment costs. Traditional cost-effectiveness studies rely on clinical trial protocols unlikely to capture actual practice behavior, and existing studies use data predating new technologies. Real-world evidence reflecting these changes is lacking. Objective To assess real-world costs of first-line prostate cancer management. Design setting and participants We used clinical electronic health records for 2008-2018 linked with the California Cancer Registry and the Medicare Fee Schedule to assess costs over 24 or 60 mo following diagnosis. We identified surgery or radiation treatments with structured methods, while we used both structured data and natural language processing to identify AS. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis Our results are risk-stratified calculated cost per day (CCPD) for first-line management, which are independent of treatment duration. We used the Kruskal-Wallis test to compare unadjusted CCPD while analysis of covariance log-linear models adjusted estimates for age and Charlson comorbidity. Results and limitations In 3433 patients, surgery (54.6%) was more common than radiation (22.3%) or AS (23.0%). Two years following diagnosis, AS ($2.97/d) was cheaper than surgery ($5.67/d) or radiation ($9.34/d) in favorable disease, while surgery ($7.17/d) was cheaper than radiation ($16.34/d) for unfavorable disease. At 5 yr, AS ($2.71/d) remained slightly cheaper than surgery ($2.87/d) and radiation ($4.36/d) in favorable disease, while for unfavorable disease surgery ($4.15/d) remained cheaper than radiation ($10.32/d). Study limitations include information derived from a single healthcare system and costs based on benchmark Medicare estimates rather than actual payment exchanges. Patient summary Active surveillance was cheaper than surgery (-47.6%) and radiation (-68.2%) at 2 yr for favorable-risk disease, which decreased by 5 yr (-5.6% and -37.8%, respectively). Surgery was less costly than radiation for unfavorable risk for both intervals (-56.1% and -59.8%, respectively).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Nicolas Bievre
- Department of Statistics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Laurence C Baker
- Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - James D Brooks
- Department of Urology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Douglas W Blayney
- Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.,Stanford Cancer Institute, School of Medicine, Stanford University, CA, USA.,Clinical Excellence Research Center, School of Medicine, Stanford University, CA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Steinberg JR, Weeks BT, Reyes GA, Conway Fitzgerald A, Zhang WY, Lindsay SE, Anderson JN, Chan K, Richardson MT, Magnani CJ, Igbinosa I, Girsen A, El-Sayed YY, Turner BE, Lyell DJ. The obstetrical research landscape: a cross-sectional analysis of clinical trials from 2007-2020. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM 2020; 3:100253. [PMID: 33043288 PMCID: PMC7537600 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2020.100253] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2020] [Accepted: 09/26/2020] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
Background Obstetrical complications affect more than a third of women globally, but are underrepresented in clinical research. Little is known about the comprehensive obstetrical clinical trial landscape, how it compares with other fields, or factors associated with the successful completion of obstetrical trials. Objective This study aimed to characterize obstetrical clinical trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov with the primary objective of identifying features associated with early discontinuation and results reporting. Study Design This is a cross-sectional study with descriptive, logistic regression and Cox regression analyses of clinical trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov. Our primary exposure variables were trial focus (obstetrical or nonobstetrical) and trial funding (industry, United States government, or academic). We conducted additional exploratory analyses of other trial features including design, enrollment, and therapeutic focus. We examined the associations of exposure variables and other trial features with 2 primary outcomes: early discontinuation and results reporting. Results We downloaded data for all studies (N=332,417) registered on ClinicalTrials.gov from October 1, 2007, to March 9, 2020, from the Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov database. We excluded studies with a noninterventional design (n=63,697) and those registered before October 1, 2007 (n=45,209). A total of 4276 obstetrical trials (1.9%) (ie, interventional studies) and 219,235 nonobstetric trials (98.1%) were compared. Among all trials, 2.8% of academic-funded trials, 1.9% of United States government–funded trials, and 0.4% of industry-funded trials focused on obstetrics. The quantity of obstetrical trials increased over time (10.8% annual growth rate). Compared with nonobstetrical trials, obstetrical trials had a greater risk of early discontinuation (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.40; 95% confidence interval, 1.21–1.62; P<.0001) and similar odds of results reporting (adjusted odds ratio, 0.89; 95% confidence interval, 0.72–1.10; P=.19). Among obstetrical trials funders after controlling for confounding variables, United States government–funded trials were at the lowest risk of early discontinuation (United States government, adjusted hazard ratio, 0.23; 95% confidence interval, 0.07–0.69; P=.009; industry reference; academic, adjusted hazard ratio, 1.04; 95% confidence interval, 0.62–1.74; P=.88). Academic-funded trials had the lowest odds of results reporting after controlling for confounding variables (academic institutions, adjusted odds ratio, 0.39; 95% confidence interval, 0.22–0.68; P=.0009; industry reference; United States government, adjusted odds ratio, 1.06; 95% confidence interval, 0.53–2.09; P=.87). Conclusion Obstetrical trials represent only 1.9% of all clinical trials in ClinicalTrials.gov and have comparatively poor completion. All stakeholders should commit to increasing the number of obstetrical trials and improving their completion and dissemination to ensure clinical research reflects the obstetrical burden of disease and advances maternal health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jecca R Steinberg
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL.
| | - Brannon T Weeks
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Stanford Medical School, Stanford, CA
| | - Griselda A Reyes
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of California, Irvine, Orange, CA
| | | | - Wendy Y Zhang
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of California, Irvine, Orange, CA
| | - Sarah E Lindsay
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Stanford Medical School, Stanford, CA
| | - Jill N Anderson
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Stanford Medical School, Stanford, CA
| | - Katelyn Chan
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Stanford Medical School, Stanford, CA
| | - Michael T Richardson
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
| | | | - Irogue Igbinosa
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Stanford Medical School, Stanford, CA
| | - Anna Girsen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Stanford Medical School, Stanford, CA
| | - Yasser Y El-Sayed
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Stanford Medical School, Stanford, CA
| | - Brandon E Turner
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Stanford Medical School, Stanford, CA
| | - Deirdre J Lyell
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Stanford Medical School, Stanford, CA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Magnani CJ, Li K, Seto T, McDonald KM, Blayney DW, Brooks JD, Hernandez-Boussard T. PSA Testing Use and Prostate Cancer Diagnostic Stage After the 2012 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Guideline Changes. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2020; 17:795-803. [PMID: 31319390 DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2018.7274] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2018] [Accepted: 01/15/2019] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Most patients with prostate cancer are diagnosed with low-grade, localized disease and may not require definitive treatment. In 2012, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommended against prostate cancer screening to address overdetection and overtreatment. This study sought to determine the effect of guideline changes on prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening and initial diagnostic stage for prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS A difference-in-differences analysis was conducted to compare changes in PSA screening (exposure) relative to cholesterol testing (control) after the 2012 USPSTF guideline changes, and chi-square test was used to determine whether there was a subsequent decrease in early-stage, low-risk prostate cancer diagnoses. Data were derived from a tertiary academic medical center's electronic health records, a national commercial insurance database (OptumLabs), and the SEER database for men aged ≥35 years before (2008-2011) and after (2013-2016) the guideline changes. RESULTS In both the academic center and insurance databases, PSA testing significantly decreased for all men compared with the control. The greatest decrease was among men aged 55 to 74 years at the academic center and among those aged ≥75 years in the commercial database. The proportion of early-stage prostate cancer diagnoses (<T2) decreased across age groups at the academic center and in the SEER database. CONCLUSIONS In primary care, PSA testing decreased significantly and fewer prostate cancers were diagnosed at an early stage, suggesting provider adherence to the 2012 USPSTF guideline changes. Long-term follow-up is needed to understand the effect of decreased screening on prostate cancer survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Kevin Li
- Stanford University School of Medicine
| | - Tina Seto
- Stanford School of Medicine, IRT Research Technology
| | | | - Douglas W Blayney
- Department of Medicine, Stanford University.,Stanford Cancer Institute; and
| | | | - Tina Hernandez-Boussard
- Department of Medicine, Stanford University.,Department of Biomedical Data Science, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Todd ZR, Fahrenbach AC, Ranjan S, Magnani CJ, Szostak JW, Sasselov DD. Ultraviolet-Driven Deamination of Cytidine Ribonucleotides Under Planetary Conditions. Astrobiology 2020; 20:878-888. [PMID: 32267736 PMCID: PMC9634989 DOI: 10.1089/ast.2019.2182] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/05/2023]
Abstract
A previously proposed synthesis of pyrimidine ribonucleotides makes use of ultraviolet (UV) light to convert β-d-ribocytidine-2',3'-cyclic phosphate to β-d-ribouridine-2',3'-cyclic phosphate, while simultaneously selectively degrading synthetic byproducts. Past studies of the photochemical reactions of pyrimidines have employed mercury arc lamps, characterized by narrowband emission centered at 254 nm, which is not representative of the UV environment of the early Earth. To further assess this process under more realistic circumstances, we investigated the wavelength dependence of the UV-driven conversion of β-d-ribocytidine-2',3'-cyclic phosphate to β-d-ribouridine-2',3'-cyclic phosphate. We used constraints provided by planetary environments to assess the implications for pyrimidine nucleotides on the early Earth. We found that the wavelengths of light (255-285 nm) that most efficiently drive the deamination of β-d-ribocytidine-2',3'-cyclic phosphate to β-d-ribouridine-2',3'-cyclic phosphate are accessible on planetary surfaces such as those of the Hadean-Archaean Earth for CO2-N2-dominated atmospheres. However, continued irradiation could eventually lead to low levels of ribocytidine in a low-temperature, highly irradiated environment, if production rates are slow.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zoe R. Todd
- Department of Astronomy, Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, Cambridge, Massachusetts
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Department of Molecular Biology and Center for Computational and Integrative Biology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
- Address correspondence to: Zoe R. Todd, Department of Astronomy, Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, 60 Garden Street Mail-Stop 10, Cambridge, MA 02138
| | | | - Sukrit Ranjan
- SCOL Postdoctoral Fellow, Department of Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts
| | - Christopher J. Magnani
- Department of Astronomy, Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, Cambridge, Massachusetts
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Department of Molecular Biology and Center for Computational and Integrative Biology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jack W. Szostak
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Department of Molecular Biology and Center for Computational and Integrative Biology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Dimitar D. Sasselov
- Department of Astronomy, Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, Cambridge, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Li K, Banerjee I, Magnani CJ, Blayney DW, Brooks JD, Hernandez-Boussard T. Clinical Documentation to Predict Factors Associated with Urinary Incontinence Following Prostatectomy for Prostate Cancer. Res Rep Urol 2020; 12:7-14. [PMID: 32158720 PMCID: PMC6986242 DOI: 10.2147/rru.s234178] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2019] [Accepted: 12/11/2019] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Advances in data collection provide opportunities to use population samples in identifying risk factors for urinary incontinence (UI), which occurs in up to 71% of men with prostate cancer following prostatectomy. Most studies on patient-centered outcomes use surveys or manual chart abstraction for data collection, which can be costly and difficult to scale. We sought to evaluate rates of and risk factors for UI following prostatectomy using natural language processing on electronic health record (EHR) data. Methods We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients undergoing prostatectomy for prostate cancer between January 2008 and August 2018 using EHR data from an academic medical center. UI incidence for each patient in the cohort was assessed using natural language processing from clinical notes generated pre- and postoperatively. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate potential risk factors for postoperative UI at various time points within 2 years following surgery. Results We identified 3792 patients who underwent prostatectomy for prostate cancer. We found a significant association between preoperative UI and UI in the first (odds ratio [OR], 2.30; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.24–4.28) and second (OR 2.24, 95% CI 1.04–4.83) years following surgery. Preoperative body mass index was also associated with UI in the second postoperative year (OR 1.11, 95% CI 1.02–1.21). Conclusion We show that a natural language processing approach using clinical narratives can be used to assess risk for UI in prostate cancer patients. Unstructured clinical narrative text can help advance future population-level research in patient-centered outcomes and quality of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin Li
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Imon Banerjee
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Emory School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | | | - Douglas W Blayney
- Department of Medicine (Oncology), Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - James D Brooks
- Department of Urology (Urologic Oncology), Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Tina Hernandez-Boussard
- Department of Medicine (Biomedical Informatics), Biomedical Data Sciences, and Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Magnani CJ, Li K, Seto T, McDonald KM, Blayney DW, Brooks JD, Hernandez-Boussard T. MP40-03 CHANGES IN PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN SCREENING AND PROSTATE CANCER DIAGNOSIS AFTER GUIDELINE CHANGES. J Urol 2018. [DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2018.02.1270] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
20
|
Li K, Magnani CJ, Bozkurt S, Seto T, Blayney DW, Brooks JD, Hernandez-Boussard T. Practice-based evidence for factors associated with urinary incontinence following prostate cancer care. J Clin Oncol 2018. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2018.36.6_suppl.106] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
106 Background: Urinary incontinence (UI) is a common complication following treatment for localized prostate cancer. Past studies evaluating UI risk factors use surveys or chart abstraction, which may be costly and lack generalizability. Electronic health records (EHR) allow us to examine UI at a population level. We applied data mining methods to EHR data to: (1) evaluate rates of UI following prostate cancer treatment; and (2) evaluate potential risk factors for posttreatment UI. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients undergoing prostatectomy or radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer between 2009-2016, and who received follow-up care at our medical center. Our cohort was constructed from the institutional EHR and the California Cancer Registry. The primary outcome was the presence of UI, measured in three-month intervals from the start of first-line treatment. The secondary outcome was UI 12-24 months following treatment (“late UI”). UI was assessed using natural language processing of EHR clinician notes. UI was also assessed with the EPIC-26 quality of life survey, which a subset of patients had prospectively completed. Results: Our cohort consisted of 2783 men, of whom 1907 (69%) underwent surgery and the remainder received radiation; of this cohort, 609 (22%) had data on late UI status. UI prevalence was higher among surgery than radiation patients across all posttreatment time points, and 278 of 434 (64%) surgery patients had late UI compared to 78 of 175 (45%) radiation patients (p < 0.001). Univariable analyses showed an association between pretreatment and late UI among surgery patients as measured in the EHR (OR 2.5, 95% CI 1.0-6.5, p = 0.05) and by EPIC-26 (OR 8.1, 95% CI 1.8-36.5, p = 0.01). Only surgery (compared to radiation) was a significant predictor of late UI (OR 5.8, 95% CI 1.1-32.3, p = 0.05) in multivariable regression with EHR data. Conclusions: Using EHR data, we found that treatment modality was a significant predictor of late UI among prostate cancer patients who underwent prostatectomy or radiation therapy. These results suggest the utility of EHRs in patient-centered outcomes research in prostate cancer care, and should be validated at other sites.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin Li
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
| | | | - Selen Bozkurt
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
| | - Tina Seto
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Todd ZR, Fahrenbach AC, Magnani CJ, Ranjan S, Björkbom A, Szostak JW, Sasselov DD. Solvated-electron production using cyanocuprates is compatible with the UV-environment on a Hadean–Archaean Earth. Chem Commun (Camb) 2018; 54:1121-1124. [PMID: 29334083 PMCID: PMC9631354 DOI: 10.1039/c7cc07748c] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
UV-driven photoredox processing of cyanocuprates can generate simple sugars necessary for prebiotic synthesis. We investigate the wavelength dependence of this process from 215 to 295 nm and generally observe faster rates at shorter wavelengths. The most efficient wavelengths are accessible to a range of potential prebiotic atmospheres, supporting the potential role of cyanocuprate photochemistry in prebiotic synthesis on the early Earth. Simple sugars necessary for the synthesis of prebiotic molecules can be generated from UV-driven cyanocuprate photoprocessing under conditions consistent with those expected on the surface of the early Earth.![]()
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zoe R. Todd
- Department of Astronomy
- Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics
- 60 Garden Street
- Cambridge
- USA
| | - Albert C. Fahrenbach
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute
- Department of Molecular Biology and Center for Computational and Integrative Biology
- Massachusetts General Hospital
- 185 Cambridge Street
- Boston
| | - Christopher J. Magnani
- Department of Astronomy
- Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics
- 60 Garden Street
- Cambridge
- USA
| | - Sukrit Ranjan
- Department of Astronomy
- Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics
- 60 Garden Street
- Cambridge
- USA
| | - Anders Björkbom
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute
- Department of Molecular Biology and Center for Computational and Integrative Biology
- Massachusetts General Hospital
- 185 Cambridge Street
- Boston
| | - Jack W. Szostak
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute
- Department of Molecular Biology and Center for Computational and Integrative Biology
- Massachusetts General Hospital
- 185 Cambridge Street
- Boston
| | - Dimitar D. Sasselov
- Department of Astronomy
- Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics
- 60 Garden Street
- Cambridge
- USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Xu J, Tsanakopoulou M, Magnani CJ, Szabla R, Šponer JE, Šponer J, Góra RW, Sutherland JD. A prebiotically plausible synthesis of pyrimidine β-ribonucleosides and their phosphate derivatives involving photoanomerization. Nat Chem 2016; 9:303-309. [PMID: 28338689 DOI: 10.1038/nchem.2664] [Citation(s) in RCA: 85] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2016] [Accepted: 09/30/2016] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Previous research has identified ribose aminooxazoline as a potential intermediate in the prebiotic synthesis of the pyrimidine nucleotides with remarkable properties. It crystallizes spontaneously from reaction mixtures, with an enhanced enantiomeric excess if initially enantioenriched, which suggests that reservoirs of this compound might have accumulated on the early Earth in an optically pure form. Ribose aminooxazoline can be converted efficiently into α-ribocytidine by way of 2,2'-anhydroribocytidine, although anomerization to β-ribocytidine by ultraviolet irradiation is extremely inefficient. Our previous work demonstrated the synthesis of pyrimidine β-ribonucleotides, but at the cost of ignoring ribose aminooxazoline, using arabinose aminooxazoline instead. Here we describe a long-sought route through ribose aminooxazoline to the pyrimidine β-ribonucleosides and their phosphate derivatives that involves an extraordinarily efficient photoanomerization of α-2-thioribocytidine. In addition to the canonical nucleosides, our synthesis accesses β-2-thioribouridine, a modified nucleoside found in transfer RNA that enables both faster and more-accurate nucleic acid template-copying chemistry.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jianfeng Xu
- MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Francis Crick Avenue, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge CB2 0QH, UK
| | - Maria Tsanakopoulou
- MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Francis Crick Avenue, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge CB2 0QH, UK
| | - Christopher J Magnani
- MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Francis Crick Avenue, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge CB2 0QH, UK
| | - Rafał Szabla
- Institute of Biophysics, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Královopolská 135, 61265 Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Judit E Šponer
- Institute of Biophysics, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Královopolská 135, 61265 Brno, Czech Republic.,CEITEC - Central European Institute of Technology, Masaryk University, Campus Bohunice, Kamenice 5, CZ-62500 Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Jiří Šponer
- Institute of Biophysics, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Královopolská 135, 61265 Brno, Czech Republic.,CEITEC - Central European Institute of Technology, Masaryk University, Campus Bohunice, Kamenice 5, CZ-62500 Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Robert W Góra
- Department of Physical and Quantum Chemistry, Faculty of Chemistry, Wrocław University of Technology, Wybrzeże Wyspiańskiego 27, 50-370 Wrocław, Poland
| | - John D Sutherland
- MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Francis Crick Avenue, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge CB2 0QH, UK
| |
Collapse
|