Evaluation of the Novel Sepsis Biomarker Host-Derived Delta-like Canonical Notch Ligand 1-A Secondary Analysis of 405 Patients Suffering from Inflammatory or Infectious Diseases

Sepsis is defined as organ failure caused by dysregulated host response to infection. While early antibiotic treatment in patients with acute infection is essential, treating non-infectious patients must be avoided. Current guidelines recommend procalcitonin (PCT) to guide discontinuation of antibiotic treatment. For initiation of therapy, there is currently no recommended biomarker. In this study, we evaluated Host-Derived Delta-like Canonical Notch Ligand 1 (DLL1), a monocyte membrane ligand that has shown promising results in differentiating infectious from non-infectious critically ill patients. Soluble DLL1 levels were measured in plasma samples of six different cohorts. The six cohorts comprise two cohorts with non-infectious inflammatory auto-immune diseases (Hidradenitis Suppurativa, Inflammatory Bowel Disease), one cohort of bacterial skin infection, and three cohorts of suspected systemic infection or sepsis. In total, soluble DLL1 plasma levels of 405 patients were analyzed. Patients were divided into three groups: inflammatory disease, infection, and sepsis (defined according to the Sepsis-3 definition), followed by the evaluation of its diagnostic performance via Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristics (AUROC) analyses. Patients of the sepsis group showed significantly elevated plasma DLL1 levels compared to patients with uncomplicated infections and sterile inflammation. However, patients with infections had significantly higher DLL1 levels than patients with inflammatory diseases. Diagnostic performance was evaluated and showed better performance for DLL1 for the recognition of sepsis (AUC: 0.823; CI 0.731-0.914) than C-reactive protein (AUC 0.758; CI 0.658-0.857), PCT (AUC 0.593; CI 0.474-0.711) and White Blood Cell count (AUC 0.577; CI 0.46-0.694). DLL1 demonstrated promising results for diagnosing sepsis and was able to differentiate sepsis from other infectious and inflammatory diseases.

Advancements in the pharmacological management of sepsis in the elderly

INTRODUCTION

Sepsis is a global health threat with high associated mortalityespecially among the elderly. Population aging and sepsis have a tremendous negative impacton national health systems worldwide. Biomarkers have been used to guide early diagnosis and treatment. Antibioticshave been the cornerstone for the treatment of sepsis while immune modulatorytherapies, except hydrocortisone, have gained a lot of attention lately. Thisreview attempts to give a fully detailed summary of the advancements in thepharmacological management of sepsis in the elderly.

AREAS COVERED

The authors conducted a systematic literature search in the PubMeddatabase using the keywords "sepsis in the elderly", "sepsis and biomarkers", "sepsisand antibiotics", "sepsis and renal dysfunction", "sepsis and hydrocortisone" for articles published only in Englishlanguage from 2017 up to 2022. The search was restricted to clinical trials andmeta-analyses covering the population of interest.

EXPERT OPINION

Despite the authorization of several novelantibiotic regimens targeting multidrug-resistant pathogens, mortality remains high. Adjunctive precision immunotherapy treatment is a new era of research which recentlyattracts much attention. Combination of antibiotics with precisionimmunotherapy inan individualized pattern may be the key for decreasing mortality and improveoutcomes.

Preliminary Data of a Quantitative Point of Care Test for SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies From Greece

BACKGROUND

Antibody testing is necessary to identify immune individuals in the post-initial wave of the COVID-19 pandemic.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We prospectively evaluated the performance of a quantitative point-of-care test (POCT) for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. The patient group (PG) comprised of hospitalized confirmed COVID-19 cases. Asymptomatic healthcare volunteers with negative rRT-PCR were included in the control group (CG). Measurement of IgM and IgG was obtained by dry fluorescence immunoassay.

RESULTS

Twenty-six PG (65.9±15.4 years old, male 57.7%) and 18 CG (45.6±10.1 years old, male 33.3%) were included. By manufacturer's cut-off (≥0.04 mIU/ml), sensitivity and specificity were 73.08% and 88.89% for IgM and 88.46% and 33.33% for IgG, respectively. Estimated areas under the ROC curve were 0.907 and 0.848 for IgM and IgG, respectively. Results were improved using a cut-off of IgM ≥0.05 mIU/ml and IgG ≥0.10 mIU/ml.

CONCLUSION

Using stringent cut-off values, SARS-CoV-2 antibody POCT detects immune people and can be used during socioeconomic normalization of communities.

A cost of illness analysis of hepatocellular carcinoma for the Greek healthcare setting

AIM

To estimate the cost per patient for hepatocellular carcinoma in Greece, a setting that is currently facing financial constraints.

BACKGROUND

Hepatocellular carcinoma patient management strategies are associated with significant costs. Despite this, patient level data on healthcare resource use and cost-of-illness analyses of hepatocellular carcinoma remain rather scarce in the international literature.

METHODS

123 patients diagnosed with hepatocellular carcinoma and followed in a specialised clinic of a tertiary hospital in Greece formed the basis of the analysis. Detailed resource use data were derived from the medical records of each patient. Data were recorded from the first encounter of the patient with the facility until a fatal endpoint or until the last day of follow up. Patients that were lost to follow-up were excluded from the analysis. Calculations follow a third-party payer perspective, according to official prices and tariffs.

RESULTS

The average cost per patient was estimated at 12,119.1 Euros (SD: 14,670.3) (21,375.1 PPP USD) for the average follow-up period and 10,241.5 Euros (18,063.5 PPP USD) per year. Median costs per month of follow-up according to underlying disease were 1,218.1, 1,376.8, 1,521.3 and 686.9 Euros (2,148.4, 2,428.3, 2,683.2 and 1,211.5 PPP USD) for patients with alcoholic steatohepatitis, hepatitis B, hepatitis C and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Hepatocellular carcinoma represents a heavy toll, both from the clinical as well as from the economic perspective, especially for a setting in "dire straits". Interventions towards reducing the incidence and, subsequently, the cost of HCC are imperative.