Exploring hypoglossal nerve stimulation therapy for obstructive sleep apnea: A comprehensive review of clinical and physiological upper airway outcomes

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a chronic disorder characterized by recurrent episodes of upper airway collapse during sleep, which can lead to serious health issues like cardiovascular disease and neurocognitive impairments. While positive airway pressure serves as the standard treatment, intolerance in some individuals necessitates exploration of alternative therapies. Hypoglossal nerve stimulation (HGNS) promises to mitigate OSA morbidity by stimulating the tongue muscles to maintain airway patency. However, its effectiveness varies, prompting research for optimization. This review summarizes the effects of HGNS on upper airway obstruction from human and animal studies. It examines physiological responses including critical closing pressure, maximal airflow, nasal and upper airway resistance, compliance, stiffness, and geometry. Interactions among these parameters and discrepant findings in animal and human studies are explored. Additionally, the review summarizes the impact of HGNS on established OSA metrics, such as the apnea-hypopnea index, oxygen desaturation index, and sleep arousals. Various therapeutic modalities, including selective unilateral or bilateral HGNS, targeted unilateral HGNS, and whole unilateral or bilateral HGNS, are discussed. This review consolidates our understanding of HGNS mechanisms, fostering exploration of under-investigated outcomes and approaches to drive advancements in HGNS therapy.

Device-related outcomes following hypoglossal nerve stimulator implantation

STUDY OBJECTIVES

Hypoglossal nerve stimulation (HGNS) has been widely used to treat obstructive sleep apnea in selected patients. Here we evaluate rates of revision and explant related to HGNS implantation and assess types of adverse events contributing to revision and explant.

METHODS

Post-market surveillance data for HGNS implanted between January 1, 2018 and March 31, 2022, were collected. Event rates and risk were calculated using the post-market surveillance event counts and sales volume over the same period. Indications were categorized for analysis. Descriptive statistics were reported and freedom from explant or revision curves were grouped by year of implantation.

RESULTS

Of the 20,881 HGNS implants assessed, rates of explant and revision within the first year were 0.723% and 1.542%, respectively. The most common indication for explant was infection (0.378%) and for revision was surgical correction (0.680%). Of the 5,820 devices with three-year post-implantation data, the rate of explant was 2.680% and of revision was 3.557%. During this same interval, elective removal (1.478%) was the most common indication, and for revisions, surgical correction (1.134%).

CONCLUSIONS

The efficacy of HGNS is comparable in the real world setting to published clinical trial data. Rates of explant and revision are low, supporting a satisfactory safety profile for this technology.

Consensus Statements among European Sleep Surgery Experts on Snoring and Obstructive Sleep Apnea: Part 2 Decision-Making in Surgical Management and Peri-Operative Considerations

Background: Reaching consensus on decision-making in surgical management and peri-operative considerations regarding snoring and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) among sleep surgeons is critical in the management of patients with such conditions, where there is a large degree of variability. Methods: A set of statements was developed based on the literature and circulated among eight panel members of European experts, utilizing the Delphi method. Responses were provided as agree and disagree on each statement, and the comments were used to assess the level of consensus and develop a revised version. The new version, with the level of consensus and anonymized comments, was sent to each panel member as the second round. This was repeated for a total of five rounds. Results: The final set included a total of 71 statements: 29 stand-alone and 11 with 42 sub-statements. On the 33 statements regarding decision-making in surgical management, there was 60.6%, 27.3%, and 6.1% consensus among all eight, seven, and six panelists, respectively. On the 38 statements regarding the peri-operative considerations, there was 55.3%, 18.4%, and 15.8% consensus among all eight, seven, and six panelists, respectively. Conclusions: These results indicate the need for an expanded review of the literature and discussion to enhance consensus among the sleep surgeons that consider surgical management in patients with snoring and OSA.

Patient-reported experience with hypoglossal nerve stimulation in the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea

BACKGROUND

Breathing-synchronized hypoglossal nerve stimulation (HNS) is routinely used as an alternative treatment for patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Significant and clinically relevant improvements in disease severity and OSA symptoms such as daytime sleepiness as well as overall quality of life have been reported in randomized-controlled trials and large real-world cohort studies. However, so far, few data exist on patient-reported experience with the treatment.

METHODS

A structured survey with 22 questions was constructed using five-level Likert scales (1 = no agreement, 5 = complete agreement) to evaluate patient experience with HNS and perception of the treatment in the domains "Overall experience with therapy," "Experience with treatment process," and "Side-effects from treatment." Additional data were collected on current symptom status, measured with Epworth sleepiness scale (ESS) questionnaire, and OSA disease history. Multiple linear regression analysis was conducted to test associations of medical variables and response behavior. Correlations between variables and domains, as well as individual items, were assessed using Spearman rank test.

RESULTS

A total of 75 patients from Germany who were treated with breathing-synchronized HNS were enrolled (mean age 57.3 years, 78% male), and 71 questionnaires with complete data were included for analysis. Two-thirds of participants (67%) had a history of OSA history for 5 years or longer. Of all patients, 76% had normalized OSA symptoms at time of the study (ESS: 6.4 ± 5.0) and 98% reported using stimulation therapy every night. Regression analysis revealed an association of current symptoms measured with ESS and response behavior. Hence, patients with normalized daytime sleepiness reported significantly more positive experience across all domains assessed, compared to patients with residual daytime sleepiness. Overall, only 2% of participants reported side effects that made them reduce or discontinue stimulation therapy. The rate of reported side effects was associated with current symptom control under therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall patient-reported experience with breathing-synchronized HNS therapy was positive and high satisfaction with the treatment process was observed. Side effects occurred, but rarely affected subjective use of the therapy or satisfaction. Subjective experience and perception are influenced by residual daytime sleepiness with stimulation therapy.

Consensus Statements among European Sleep Surgery Experts on Snoring and Obstructive Sleep Apnea: Part 1 Definitions and Diagnosis

Seeking consensus on definitions and diagnosis of snoring and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) among sleep surgeons is important, particularly in this relatively new field with variability in knowledge and practices. A set of statements was developed based on the literature and circulated among eight panel members of European experts, utilizing the Delphi method. Responses in agreement and disagreement on each statement and the comments were used to assess the level of consensus and develop a revised version. The new version with the level of consensus and anonymized comments was sent to each panel member as the second round. This was repeated a total of five rounds. The total number of statements included in the initial set was 112. In the first round, of all eight panelists, the percentage of questions that had consensus among the eight, seven, and six panelists were 45%, 4.5%, and 7.1%, respectively. In the final set of statements consisting of 99, the percentage of questions that had consensus among the 8, 7, and 6 panelists went up to 66.7%, 24.2%, and 6.1%, respectively. Delphi's method demonstrated an efficient method of interaction among experts and the establishment of consensus on a specific set of statements.

Patient-reported outcomes with hypoglossal nerve stimulation for treatment of obstructive sleep apnea: a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Hypoglossal nerve stimulation (HNS) has recently been introduced as an alternative treatment for patients with OSA. A large number of studies have demonstrated substantial changes in OSA with this therapy by reducing respiratory events and improving symptoms such as daytime sleepiness and quality of life. The objective of this review was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate patient-reported outcomes and experience with HNS therapy.

METHODS

A systematic literature search of MEDLINE, Cochrane, and Web of Science was performed to identify randomized controlled and observational studies reporting subjective outcomes with different HNS systems in patients with OSA. Abstracts of 406 articles were screened and a subset of 55 articles were reviewed for eligibility. Risk of bias was assessed using the ROBINS-I tool. Meta-analysis using RevMan was performed when > 2 studies were identified that reported data on a specific outcome.

RESULTS

Thirty-four publications reporting data on 3785 patients with a mean follow-up of 11.8 ± 12.2 months were identified and included in the meta-analysis. The analysis revealed a pooled effect of 4.59 points improvement in daytime sleepiness as measured by the ESS questionnaire (Z = 42.82, p < .001), 2.84 points improvement in daytime functioning as measured by the FOSQ score (Z = 28.38, p < .001), and 1.77 points improvement in sleep quality as measured by the PSQI questionnaire (Z = 2.53, p = .010). Patient-reported experience was consistently positive and revealed additional relevant aspects from this perspective.

CONCLUSION

HNS therapy significantly improves quality of life in patients with OSA and reliably produces clinically meaningful effects on daytime sleepiness, daytime functioning, and sleep quality. Treatment regularly meets or exceeds the minimum clinically important differences defined for the respective instruments. Additional research is needed to further investigate effects on quality of life beyond improvements in daytime sleepiness and daytime functioning.

[Laryngeal-preservation surgery in laryngeal cancer]

After oral cavity and pharyngeal cancer, laryngeal cancer is the third most common malignant tumor in the head and neck region. According to the current German S3 guideline on the diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of laryngeal cancer, larynx-preserving surgical interventions are part of the standard treatment of this disease, even in advanced tumor stages. However, in order to achieve the desired function-preserving effect, an exact indication is of crucial importance. In this article, the most important larynx-preserving interventions and their indications but also the respective contraindications are presented, with the aim of illuminating the surgical treatment options up to just before total laryngectomy.

Point Shear Wave Elastography in Diagnosis and Follow-Up of Salivary Gland Affection after Head and Neck Cancer Treatment

Therapies of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), particularly irradiation and chemotherapy (C/RT), can affect salivary glands to some extent. Recent studies suggest that point shear wave elastography (pSWE) is well suited for the diagnosis and rating of homogenous damage to parenchymatous organs. The purpose of this study was to assess the value of this sonographic modality as a tool for the evaluation both of salivary gland affection after HNSCC therapy and the effect of a salivary replacement therapy based on liposomes. A total of 69 HNSCC patients were included in this study. All patients had finished cancer treatment and attended regular follow-up. pSWE values of ipsi- and contralateral parotid (PG) and submandibular glands (SMG) were obtained in a standardized manner and compared to those of a healthy control (HC) group. After a two months treatment with a liposomal saliva replacement therapy pSWE quantification was performed again. Ipsi- and contralateral salivary glands suffer under standard HNSCC tumor therapy. Here, the ipsilateral parotid gland (PG) is primarily affected. Therefore, a sequence of manifestation (surgery < surgery plus adjuvant C/RT < primary C/RT) is comprehensible, evaluated by pSWE measurements. The examination of all glands and statistical analysis of the values compared to controls resulted in an pSWE cutoff value for affected glandular tissue of >2 m/s. Using a liposomal saliva replacement therapy, pSWE values of the ipsilateral PG can be improved, although the level of HC could not be restored.

Bilateral vs Unilateral Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulation in Patients With Obstructive Sleep Apnea

Objective

Unilateral hypoglossal nerve stimulation (uniHNS) is an effective treatment for obstructive sleep apnea. Bilateral hypoglossal nerve stimulation (biHNS) is a novel therapeutic option and a different approach to hypoglossal nerve stimulation. The aim of this study was to analyze the clinical outcome of the first 10 biHNS cases vs the first 10 uniHNS cases ever implanted.

Study Design

Prospective data analysis.

Setting

International multicenter comparative clinical trial.

Methods

The first 10 patients in 2020 who received a biHNS device (Genio System; Nyxoah) and the first 10 patients in 2014 who received a uniHNS system (Inspire II; Inspire Medical Systems) were included. Treatment outcome was evaluated at 3 months after surgery. Data collection included demographics, apnea hypopnea index (AHI), oxygen saturation and desaturation index, Epworth Sleepiness Scale, and adverse events.

Results

The mean ± SD age was 52.1 ± 9.6 years (biHNS) and 58.3 ± 8.6 years (uniHNS). The mean body mass index was 26.4 ± 5.6 kg/m² (biHNS) and 26.2 ± 2.2 kg/m² (uniHNS). The mean preimplantation AHI (biHNS, 39.9 ± 14.8/h; uniHNS, 32.2 ± 11.0/h) decreased in both groups after 3 months (biHNS, 19.2 ± 14.0/h, P = .008; uniHNS, 13.1 ± 16.8/h, P = .037) with no significant difference between groups (P = .720). The mean preimplantation Epworth Sleepiness Scale (biHNS, 11.8 ± 6.2; uniHNS, 11.1 ± 4.9) decreased as well after 3 months (biHNS, 9.4 ± 6.3; uniHNS, 6.0 ± 5.0).

Conclusion

Preliminary postmarket data suggest that biHNS may be as safe and effective as uniHNS. Long-term follow-up in a larger sample size is required to assess the stability of biHNS.

0749 Does Prior Nasal Surgery Impact Outcomes of Upper Airway Stimulation Therapy for OSA?

Introduction

Nasal airway obstruction can play an important role in pathogenesis and treatment of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Surgery for nasal obstruction can improve patient-reported OSA outcomes, including snoring and daytime sleepiness, as well as adherence and pressure requirements with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy. The aim of this study was to examine whether previous nasal surgery was associated with UAS treatment efficacy.

Methods

From the ADHERE Registry, propensity score matching generated a cohort of UAS patients with prior nasal surgery including septoplasty, turbinate reduction, polyp removal (NS) and a comparable cohort of UAS patients without prior nasal surgery (WNS). Patients were matched based on demographic variables including pre-operative oral appliance use, prior CPAP use, gender, age, baseline apnea hypopnea index (AHI) and baseline Epworth Sleepiness Score (ESS). Data included demographic variables, therapy outcome measures including AHI, ESS, therapy use, and responder rate. Student’s t-test was used to compare normally distributed numeric data and Fisher’s exact test to compare categorical data. One sided t-tests with non-inferiority margin of 7.5 events/hr for AHI, 2 points for ESS, and 0.5 hr/night for Therapy Use were performed to determine non-inferiority.

Results

The ADHERE dataset from October 2021 included 169 patients from each cohort were matched for comparison. Reduction in AHI was 21.01 ±17.94 in WNS cohort and 18.39 ± 16.4 after UAS (p=0.162) in NS cohort. Reduction in ESS in WNS cohort was 4.85 ± 4.98 and 4.48 ±5.83 (p=0.528) in NS cohort. Therapy use was similar, 5.67 ± 1.95 in WNS and 5.97 ± 2.06 in NS (p=0.181). Responder rate was also similar in WNS (64.5%) and NS (62.1%) (p=0.735).

Conclusion

Retrospective analysis of UAS patients with vs without prior nasal surgery did not identify differences in UAS therapy outcomes or adherence. Furthermore, outcomes for patients with nasal surgery were non-inferior to those without. Future prospective studies of UAS candidates with nasal airway obstruction may better determine the role of adjunctive nasal surgery in this population.

Support (If Any)

Inspire Medical Systems

Hypoglossal nerve stimulation for obstructive sleep apnea: updated position paper of the German Society of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Head and Neck Surgery

Since the first statement of the German Society of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, hypoglossal nerve stimulation (HNS) is meanwhile an established treatment option for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). There are three HNS systems available in Germany which differ in their technical details of the underlying comparable basic principle. For the unilateral HNS with respiratory sensing, several comparative studies, high-volume register analysis and long-term reports exist. The continuous HNS without respiratory sensing does not require a sleep endoscopy for indication. For the bilateral continuous HNS as the single partially implantable device, a feasibility study exists. For indication, the assessment of positive airway pressure failure by sleep medicine is crucial, and the decision for HNS should be made in discussion of other treatment options for at least moderate OSA. The implantation center holds primarily responsibility among the interdisciplinary sleep team and is primary contact for the patient in problems. This depicts why structural processes are required to secure outcome quality and minimize the complications. The aftercare of HNS patients can be provided interdisciplinary and by different medical institutions, whereat, minimal reporting standards to document outcome and usage are recommended.

A Noninferiority Analysis of 3- vs 2-Incision Techniques for Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulator Implantation

OBJECTIVE

The only hypoglossal nerve stimulation (HNS) device available for US clinical use is implanted through 3 incisions. A recently proposed 2-incision modification moved the respiratory sensing lead from the fifth to the second intercostal space to eliminate the third lower chest incision. This study compared perioperative data and therapeutic outcomes between the techniques.

STUDY DESIGN

Noninferiority cohort analysis of a retrospective and prospective registry study.

SETTING

Tertiary care and community surgical centers.

METHODS

Patients with obstructive sleep apnea underwent HNS implantation via a modified 2-incision technique (I₂). A cohort previously implanted via the standard 3-incision technique (I₃) were 1:1 propensity score matched for a noninferiority analysis of postoperative outcomes.

RESULTS

There were 404 I₃ patients and 223 I₂ patients across 6 participating centers. Operative time decreased from 128.7 minutes (95% CI, 124.5-132.9) in I₃ patients to 86.6 minutes (95% CI, 83.7-97.6) in I₂ patients (P < .001). Postoperative sleep study data were available for 76 I₂ patients who were matched to I₃ patients. The change in apnea-hypopnea index between the cohorts was statistically noninferior (a priori noninferiority margin: 7.5 events/h; mean difference, 1.51 [97.5% CI upper bound, 5.86]). There were no significant differences between the cohorts for baseline characteristics, perioperative adverse event rates, or change in Epworth Sleepiness Score (P > .05).

CONCLUSION

In a multicenter registry, a 2-incision implant technique for a commercially available HNS device had a statistically noninferior therapeutic efficacy profile when compared with the standard 3-incision approach. The 2-incision technique is safe and effective for HNS implantation.

Impact of Body Mass Index and Discomfort on Upper Airway Stimulation: ADHERE Registry 2020 Update

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

To provide the ADHERE registry Upper Airway Stimulation (UAS) outcomes update, including analyses grouped by body mass index (BMI) and therapy discomfort.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective observational study.

METHODS

ADHERE captures UAS outcomes including apnea-hypopnea index (AHI), Epworth sleepiness scale (ESS), therapy usage, patient satisfaction, clinician assessment, and safety over a 1-year period. BMI ≤32 kg/m² (BMI₃₂ ) and 32 < BMI ≤35 kg/m² (BMI₃₅ ) group outcomes were examined.

RESULTS

One thousand eight hundred forty-nine patients enrolled in ADHERE, 1,019 reached final visit, 843 completed the visit. Significant changes in AHI (-20.9, P < .0001) and ESS (- 4.4, P < .0001) were demonstrated. Mean therapy usage was 5.6 ± 2.2 hr/day. Significant therapy use difference was present in patients with reported discomfort versus no discomfort (4.9 ± 2.5 vs. 5.7 ± 2.1 hr/day, P = .01). Patients with discomfort had higher final visit mean AHI versus without discomfort (18.9 ± 18.5 vs. 13.5 ± 13.7 events/hr, P = .01). Changes in AHI and ESS were not significantly different. Serious adverse events reported in 2.3% of patients. Device revision rate was 1.9%. Surgical success was less likely in BMI₃₅ versus BMI₃₂ patients (59.8% vs. 72.2%, P = .02). There was a significant therapy use difference: 5.8 ± 2.0 hr/day in BMI₃₂ versus 5.2 ± 2.2 hr/day in BMI₃₅ (P = .028).

CONCLUSIONS

Data from ADHERE demonstrate high efficacy rates for UAS. Although surgical response rate differs between BMI₃₂ and BMI₃₅ patient groups, the AHI and ESS reduction is similar. Discomfort affects therapy adherence and efficacy. Thus, proper therapy settings adjustment to ensure comfort is imperative to improve outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4 Laryngoscope, 131:2616-2624, 2021.

Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulation Usage by Therapy Nonresponders

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study is to examine differences in therapy usage and outcomes of therapy between responder (R) and nonresponder (NR) groups in an international, multicenter prospective registry of patients undergoing hypoglossal nerve stimulation for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA).

STUDY DESIGN

Database analysis (level III).

SETTING

International, multicenter registry.

METHODS

The studied registry prospectively collects data pre- and postimplantation, including sleep parameters, Epworth score, patient experience, and safety questions, over the course of 12 months. Patients are defined as a "responder" based on Sher criteria, which require a final apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) of ≤20 and a final AHI reduction of >50% at their 12-month follow-up.

RESULTS

Overall, there were 497 (69%) R and 220 (31%) NR. Most patients in both groups experienced improvement in quality of life following implantation (96% of R; 77% of NR) with reductions in oxygen desaturation index and Epworth score. At final follow-up, the R group demonstrated significantly better adherence to recommended therapy (>4 hours/night) (P = .001), average hours of nightly use (P = .001), final Epworth scores (P = .001), and degree of subjective improvement (P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Patients classified as NR to upper airway stimulation continue to use therapy with improvement in percent time of sleep with O₂ <90%, reduction in daytime sleepiness, and improvement in quality of life. Therefore, ongoing usage of the device should be encouraged in NR patients who note improvement while integrating additional strategies to lower the long-term effects of OSA.

Improving outcomes of hypoglossal nerve stimulation therapy: current practice, future directions and research gaps. Proceedings of the 2019 International Sleep Surgery Society Research Forum

Hypoglossal nerve stimulation (HGNS) has evolved as a novel and effective therapy for patients with moderate-to-severe obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Despite positive published outcomes of HGNS, there exist uncertainties regarding proper patient selection, surgical technique, and the reporting of outcomes and individual factors that impact therapy effectiveness. According to current guidelines, this therapy is indicated for select patients, and recommendations are based on the Stimulation Therapy for Apnea Reduction (STAR) trial. Ongoing research and physician experiences continuously improve methods to optimize the therapy. An understanding of the way in which airway anatomy, OSA phenotypes, individual health status, psychological conditions and comorbid sleep disorders influence the effectiveness of HGNS is essential to improve outcomes and expand therapy indications. This manuscript presents discussions on current evidence, future directions, and research gaps for HGNS therapy from the 10th International Surgical Sleep Society expert research panel.

Concentric vs Anteroposterior-Laterolateral Collapse of the Soft Palate in Patients With Obstructive Sleep Apnea

The presence of complete concentric collapse of the soft palate (CCCp) during drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) has important therapeutic consequences. However, CCCp may present in various, sometimes doubtful, ways due to the complex anatomy of the upper airway. Herein, we aimed to characterize these doubtful variants by reviewing the DISE recordings of patients with obstructive sleep apnea (n = 332). We observed in some individuals that the soft palate collapsed in an anteroposterior-laterolateral (AP-LL) way, producing a polygonal shape that was distinct from CCCp. Patients with this collapse pattern (n = 29) had a smaller neck circumference and less severe obstructive sleep apnea than patients with CCCp (n = 68). The majority of patients with AP-LL collapse (n = 19) were originally diagnosed with CCCp. Based on these findings, AP-LL collapse of the soft palate might represent a distinct DISE phenotype that is easily confounded with CCCp.

Effect of Upper Airway Stimulation in Patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea (EFFECT): A Randomized Controlled Crossover Trial

Background: Several single-arm prospective studies have demonstrated the safety and effectiveness of upper airway stimulation (UAS) for obstructive sleep apnea. There is limited evidence from randomized, controlled trials of the therapy benefit in terms of OSA burden and its symptoms. Methods: We conducted a multicenter, double-blinded, randomized, sham-controlled, crossover trial to examine the effect of therapeutic stimulation (Stim) versus sham stimulation (Sham) on the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) and the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS). We also examined the Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire (FOSQ) on sleep architecture. We analyzed crossover outcome measures after two weeks using repeated measures models controlling for treatment order. Results: The study randomized 89 participants 1:1 to Stim (45) versus Sham (44). After one week, the AHI response rate was 76.7% with Stim and 29.5% with Sham, a difference of 47.2% (95% CI: 24.4 to 64.9, p < 0.001) between the two groups. Similarly, ESS was 7.5 ± 4.9 with Stim and 12.0 ± 4.3 with Sham, with a significant difference of 4.6 (95% CI: 3.1 to 6.1) between the two groups. The crossover phase showed no carryover effect. Among 86 participants who completed both phases, the treatment difference between Stim vs. Sham for AHI was −15.5 (95% CI −18.3 to −12.8), for ESS it was −3.3 (95% CI −4.4 to −2.2), and for FOSQ it was 2.1 (95% CI 1.4 to 2.8). UAS effectively treated both REM and NREM sleep disordered breathing. Conclusions: In comparison with sham stimulation, therapeutic UAS reduced OSA severity, sleepiness symptoms, and improved quality of life among participants with moderate-to-severe OSA.

Obstruction level associated with outcome in hypoglossal nerve stimulation

Purpose

Selective hypoglossal nerve stimulation (sHNS) constitutes an effective surgical alternative for patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). sHNS results in tongue protrusion and consecutive alleviation of obstructions at the tongue base level (lower obstructions). Furthermore, obstructions at the soft palate level (upper obstructions) may be prevented through palatoglossal coupling as seen on sleep endoscopy. However, it has not been studied if the distribution of obstruction level during a whole night measurement is a relevant factor for the treatment outcome.

Methods

Obstruction levels were measured with a manometry system during a whole night of sleep in 26 patients with OSA (f = 1, m = 25; age 59.4 ± 11.3; BMI = 29.6 ± 3.6) either before (n = 9) or after sHNS implantation (n = 12). Five patients received a measurement before and after implantation. Obstructions were categorized into velar (soft palate and above), infravelar (below soft palate), and multilevel obstructions. An association between obstruction level and treatment outcome was calculated.

Results

The mean distribution of preoperative obstruction level could be divided into the following: 38% velar, 46% multilevel, and 16% infravelar obstructions. Patients with a good treatment response (defined as AHI < 15/h and AHI reduction of 50%) had fewer preoperative velar obstructions compared to non-responder (17% vs. 54%, p-value = 0.006). In patients measured after sHNS implantation, a significantly higher rate of multilevel obstructions per hour was measured in non-responders (p-value = 0.012).

Conclusions

Selective hypoglossal nerve stimulation was more effective in patients with fewer obstructions at the soft palate level. Manometry may be a complementary diagnostic procedure for the selection of patients for HNS.

Can Machine Learning Assist Locating the Excitation of Snore Sound? A Review

In the past three decades, snoring (affecting more than 30 % adults of the UK population) has been increasingly studied in the transdisciplinary research community involving medicine and engineering. Early work demonstrated that, the snore sound can carry important information about the status of the upper airway, which facilitates the development of non-invasive acoustic based approaches for diagnosing and screening of obstructive sleep apnoea and other sleep disorders. Nonetheless, there are more demands from clinical practice on finding methods to localise the snore sound's excitation rather than only detecting sleep disorders. In order to further the relevant studies and attract more attention, we provide a comprehensive review on the state-of-the-art techniques from machine learning to automatically classify snore sounds. First, we introduce the background and definition of the problem. Second, we illustrate the current work in detail and explain potential applications. Finally, we discuss the limitations and challenges in the snore sound classification task. Overall, our review provides a comprehensive guidance for researchers to contribute to this area.

Drug-Induced Sleep Endoscopy and Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulation Outcomes: A Multicenter Cohort Study

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

To determine the association between findings of blinded reviews of preoperative drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) and outcomes of hypoglossal nerve stimulation (HNS) for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA).

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study.

METHODS

A retrospective, multicenter cohort study of 343 adults who underwent treatment of OSA with HNS from 10 academic medical centers was performed. Preoperative DISE videos were scored by four blinded reviewers using the VOTE Classification and evaluation of a possible primary structure contributing to airway obstruction. Consensus DISE findings were examined for an association with surgical outcomes based on therapy titration polysomnogram (tPSG). Treatment response was defined by a decrease of ≥50% in the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) to <15 events/hour.

RESULTS

Study participants (76% male, 60.4 ± 11.0 years old) had a body mass index of 29.2 ± 3.6 kg/m² . AHI decreased (35.6 ± 15.2 to 11.0 ± 14.1 events/hour; P < .001) on the tPSG, with a 72.6% response rate. Complete palate obstruction (vs. none) was associated with the greatest difference in AHI improvement (-26.8 ± 14.9 vs. -19.2 ± 12.8, P = .02). Complete (vs. partial/none) tongue-related obstruction was associated with increased odds of treatment response (78% vs. 68%, P = .043). Complete (vs. partial/none) oropharyngeal lateral wall-related obstruction was associated with lower odds of surgical response (58% vs. 74%, P = .042).

CONCLUSIONS

The DISE finding of primary tongue contribution to airway obstruction was associated with better outcomes, whereas the opposite was true for the oropharyngeal lateral walls. This study suggests that the role for DISE in counseling candidates for HNS extends beyond solely for excluding complete concentric collapse related to the velum.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3 Laryngoscope, 131:1676-1682, 2021.

Die Stimulation des Nervus hypoglossus in der Behandlung der obstruktiven Schlafapnoe – Aktualisiertes Positionspapier der Arbeitsgemeinschaft Schlafmedizin der DGHNO-KHC

Hypoglossal nerve stimulation for obstructive sleep apnea - Updated position paper of the German Society of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Head and Neck Surgery. Since the first statement of the German Society of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, hypoglossal nerve stimulation (HNS) is meanwhile an established treatment option for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). There are three HNS systems available in Germany which differ in their technical details of the underlying comparable basic principle. For the unilateral HNS with respiratory sensing, several comparative studies, high-volume register analysis and long-term reports exist. The continuous HNS without respiratory sensing does not require a sleep endoscopy for indication. For the bilateral continuous HNS as the single partially implantable device, a feasibility study exists. For indication, the assessment of positive airway pressure failure by sleep medicine is crucial, and the decision for HNS should be made in discussion of other treatment options for at least moderate OSA. The implantation center holds primarily responsibility among the interdisciplinary sleep team and is primary contact for the patient in problems. This depicts why structural processes are required to secure outcome quality and minimize complications. The aftercare of HNS patients can be provided interdisciplinary and by different medical institutions whereat minimal reporting standards to document outcome and usage are recommended.

Long-term changes of stimulation intensities in hypoglossal nerve stimulation

STUDY OBJECTIVES

Hypoglossal nerve stimulation (HNS) is a novel therapy in the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea. Previous studies have focused on the effectiveness of HNS, but there are no studies specifically investigating the long-term changes of the stimulation intensities in HNS. Increasing stimulation intensity requirements have been reported in the past in other peripheral nerve stimulation therapies. The aim of this study was to investigate the development of stimulation intensities over the observation period of 4 years.

METHODS

All patients who were implanted with an HNS system since December 2013 and maintained a bipolar configuration over the observation period were included. Sensation threshold (ST), functional threshold, the titrated stimulation intensity (SI), and the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) were recorded.

RESULTS

A total of 82 patients were enrolled (sex: 69 men, 13 women, age: 60 ± 11 years, body mass index: 29. 8 ± 4.0 kg/m²). Two months after surgery, the median ST was 0.8 ± 0.5 V. During the observation period of 48 months, no significant change of ST was observed. The median ST was 1.0 ± 0.4 V (P = 0.93) at 48 months. Similar results were found for functional threshold and the titrated stimulation intensity. There was a significant reduction of the baseline median AHI when compared with the median AHI at 1, 12, 24, 36 and 48 months after surgery (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The stimulation intensities in HNS show no significant changes over 4 years. Despite the constant stimulation intensity, AHI was significantly reduced. This indicates that the stimulation threshold of the hypoglossal nerve does not change over time with this therapy.

Evaluation of Surgical Learning Curve Effect on Obstructive Sleep Apnea Outcomes in Upper Airway Stimulation

OBJECTIVE

An increasing number of facilities offer Upper Airway Stimulation (UAS) with varying levels of experience. The goal was to quantify whether a surgical learning curve exists in operative or sleep outcomes in UAS.

METHODS

International multi-center retrospective review of the ADHERE registry, a prospective international multi-center study collecting UAS outcomes. ADHERE registry centers with at least 20 implants and outcomes data through at least 6-month follow-up were reviewed. Cases were divided into two groups based on implant order (the first 10 or second 10 consecutive implants at a given site). Group differences were assessed using Mann-Whitney U-tests, Chi-squared tests, or Fisher's Exact tests, as appropriate. A Mann-Kendall trend test was used to detect if there was a monotonic trend in operative time. Sleep outcome equivalence between experience groups was assessed using the two one-sided tests approach.

RESULTS

Thirteen facilities met inclusion criteria, contributing 260 patients. Complication rates did not significantly differ between groups (P = .808). Operative time exhibited a significant downward trend (P < .001), with the median operative time dropping from 150 minutes for the first 10 implants to 134 minutes for the subsequent 10 implants. The decrease in AHI from baseline to 12-month follow-up was equivalent between the first and second ten (22.8 vs 21.2 events/hour, respectively, P < .001). Similarly, the first and second ten groups had equivalent ESS decreases at 6 months (2.0 vs 2.0, respectively, P < .001). ESS outcomes remained equivalent for those with data through 12-months.

CONCLUSIONS

Across the centers' first 20 implants, an approximately 11% reduction operative time was identified, however, no learning curve effect was seen for 6-month or 12-month AHI or ESS over the first twenty implants. Ongoing monitoring through the ADHERE registry will help measure the impact of evolving provider and patient specific characteristics as the number of implant centers increases.

Comparison of Traditional Upper Airway Surgery and Upper Airway Stimulation for Obstructive Sleep Apnea

OBJECTIVE

To compare patients with moderate-severe obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) undergoing traditional single and multilevel sleep surgery to those undergoing upper airway stimulation (UAS).

STUDY DESIGN

Case control study comparing retrospective cohort of patients undergoing traditional sleep surgery to patients undergoing UAS enrolled in the ADHERE registry.

SETTING

8 multinational academic medical centers.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

233 patients undergoing prior single or multilevel traditional sleep surgery and meeting study inclusion criteria were compared to 465 patients from the ADHERE registry who underwent UAS. We compared preoperative and postoperative demographic, quality of life, and polysomnographic data. We also evaluated treatment response rates.

RESULTS

The pre and postoperative apnea hypopnea index (AHI) was 33.5 and 15 in the traditional sleep surgery group and 32 and 10 in the UAS group. The postoperative AHI in the UAS group was significantly lower. The pre and postoperative Epworth sleepiness scores (ESS) were 12 and 6 in both the traditional sleep surgery and UAS groups. Subgroup analysis evaluated those patients undergoing single level palate and multilevel palate and tongue base traditional sleep surgeries. The UAS group had a significantly lower postoperive AHI than both traditional sleep surgery subgroups. The UAS group had a higher percentage of patients reaching surgical success, defined as a postoperative AHI <20 with a 50% reduction from preoperative severity.

CONCLUSION

UAS offers significantly better control of AHI severity than traditional sleep surgery. Quality life improvements were similar between groups.

Diagnosis and treatment of isolated snoring-open questions and areas for future research

STUDY OBJECTIVES

Snoring is a common phenomenon which is generated by vibration of soft tissue of the upper airway during sleep. Due to the high incidence of isolated snoring and the substantial burden for the patient and the bed partner, a thorough examination and appropriate therapy are required. Many recommendations for the treatment of isolated snoring are either not evidence-based or are derived from recommendations for the management of obstructive sleep apnea. Therefore, the aim of this study is the identification and description of open questions in the diagnosis and treatment of isolated snoring and the illustration of areas for further research.

METHODS

In the context of the development of the new version of the German guideline "Diagnosis and treatment of isolated snoring in adults," a multidisciplinary team of experts performed a systematic literature search on the relevant medical data and rated the current evidence regarding the key diagnostic and therapeutic measures for snoring.

RESULTS

The systematic literature review identified 2293 articles. As a major inclusion criterion, only studies on primary snoring based on objective sleep medical assessment were selected. After screening and evaluation, 33 full-text articles remained for further analysis. Based on these articles, open questions and areas for future research were identified for this review.

CONCLUSION

Several major gaps in the literature on the diagnosis and treatment of isolated snoring were identified. For the majority of diagnostic and therapeutic measures for snoring, high-level scientific evidence is still lacking.

[Drug-induced sleep endoscopy]

Drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) is a procedure for the assessment of the upper airways in patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and was first described by Croft and Pringle in 1991 1. So far, it has not been clarified to what extent the DISE can be compared to natural sleep. Eastwood and colleagues ultimately described a correlation in terms of the tendency to collapse in sedation and during natural sleep. It was shown, that DISE is useful in individual therapeutic descisions 2. In recent years, efforts to standardize the procedure have been made in order to make the results more comparable and reproducible. With the introduction and increasing use of stimulation therapy of the hypoglossal nerve, DISE has been used more and more in hospitals in recent years. This article is intended to present the procedure based on the European position paper on DISE 3 4.

Cross motor innervation of the hypoglossal nerve-a pilot study of predictors for successful opening of the soft palate

PURPOSE

Selective hypoglossal nerve stimulation has proven to be a successful treatment option in patients with obstructive sleep apnea. The aim of this pilot study was to investigate if there is a cross-innervation of the hypoglossal nerve in humans and if patients with this phenotype show a different response to hypoglossal nerve stimulation compared to those with ipsilateral-only innervation METHODS: Nineteen patients who previously received a selective hypoglossal nerve stimulation system (Inspire Medical Systems, Golden Valley, USA) were implanted with a nerve integrity system placing electrodes on both sides of the tongue. Tongue motions were recorded one and two months after surgery from transoral and transnasal views. Polysomnography (PSG) was also performed at two months. Electromyogram (EMG) signals and tongue motions after activation were compared with PSG findings.

RESULTS

Cross-innervation showed significant correlation with bilateral tongue movement and bilateral tongue base opening, which were associated with better PSG outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Cross motor innervation of the hypoglossal nerve occurs in approximately 50% of humans, which is associated with a positive effect on PSG outcomes. Bilateral stimulation of the hypoglossal nerve may be a solution for non-responding patients with pronounced collapse at the soft palate during drug-induced sleep endoscopy.

0637 Comparison of AHI and ESS Outcomes Between Patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea Undergoing Sleep Surgery versus Upper Airway Stimulation

Introduction

Single or multi-level soft tissue surgical interventions are common options for CPAP-intolerant patients with OSA. Upper Airway Stimulation (UAS) is an alternative option using an implantable hypoglossal nerve stimulator. We compared patient outcomes between traditional sleep surgery (TSS) and UAS.

Methods

We selected patients who underwent TSS (including palate, oropharynx, tongue, and/or epiglottis-based procedures) for OSA and also met general UAS criteria (BMI≤35, AHI between 15-65, absence of palate concentric collapse during DISE, if available) for chart review. UAS outcomes were collected from the ADHERE international registry. For both groups, post-op AHI was collected, including full-night UAS efficacy studies. Data are presented as mean and standard deviation.

Results

The TSS group (n=284) and UAS group (n=541) were predominantly male and overweight. The TSS group was younger than UAS (47±12 vs 60±11 years, p&lt;0.001). At baseline, both groups had severe OSA with AHI of 34±14 and 36±15 (p=0.23) and excessive daytime sleepiness with ESS of 12±5 and 12±6, (p=0.38), respectively. TSS follow-up was 169±151 days vs 392±181 days for UAS, which was significantly different. UAS had significantly larger decrease in AHI than TSS (-21/h±18 vs -16/h±16, p&lt;0.0001). Both groups had a large decrease in ESS, however, the UAS group had a slightly smaller decrease, (-6±5 vs -5±5, p=0.01). Using the Sher response criteria of 50% AHI reduction and ≤ 20 events/hour, UAS had a 70% response rate vs 51% for TSS.

Conclusion

This study represents largest and first international, multicenter comparison of UAS to traditional surgical interventions for OSA, albeit with limitations of potential differential patient selection. While both TSS and UAS show similar improvement in symptoms, upper airway stimulation has a larger reduction of AHI with higher rates of therapy response than traditional sleep surgery

Support

ADHERE data assistance from Inspire Medical (Minneapolis, MN)

Changes in breath cycle sensing affect outcomes in upper airway stimulation in sleep apnea

BACKGROUND

Upper Airway Stimulation (UAS) is a well-established therapy option for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA).

AIMS

There are no data on whether respiratory sensing contributes to successful UAS therapy.

MATERIALS & METHODS

After initial measurements of 3 implanted patients (M1), the sensing signal was inverted (M2) without changing other parameters. Two weeks later, the signal was converted back again, and the sensitivity of breathing cycle detection was turned to a very low state (M3).

RESULTS

At M2 and M3, the apnea-hypopnea index and oxygen desaturation index increased.

DISCUSSION

Correct respiratory sensing is important for controlling OSA using UAS.

CONCLUSIONS

Therefore, implant centers should should optimize respiratory sensing placement and adjustment.

Wenn CPAP nicht genutzt oder nicht vertragen wird – Vorschlag für eine standardisierte Terminologie

Hintergrund

Die Standardtherapie einer obstruktiven Schlafapnoe (OSA) ist die nächtliche positive Überdruckbeatmung (PAP). Sie ist in der Regel nebenwirkungsarm und stellt eine Langzeittherapie dar. Doch nicht jeder Patient toleriert oder akzeptiert die Therapie oder möchte sie fortführen. Andere müssen sie aus objektiven Gründen beenden.

Fragestellung

Klare Begrifflichkeiten für eine Nicht-Anwendung der PAP-Therapie sind bisher nicht in den Leitlinien definiert. Ziel dieses Beitrags ist es, einheitliche Definitionen einzuführen, die eine Vorlage für klinisches Handeln und wissenschaftliche Ansätze sein können.

Material und Methode

Ein Expertengremium hat sich intensiv mit der Literatur, Definitionen und Hintergrundinformationen hinsichtlich des Themas befasst. Es wurden verschiedene Möglichkeiten der PAP-Nicht-Nutzung bzw. der Beendigung der Therapie betrachtet und dementsprechend Kategorien und Definitionen zusammengestellt.

Ergebnisse

Dies sind die vom Expertengremium vorgeschlagenen Kategorien für eine PAP-Nichtbenutzung: PAP-Inakzeptanz, PAP-Unverträglichkeit, PAP-Intoleranz, PAP-Versagen und PAP-Abbruch.

Diskussion

Diese Kategorien inklusive Definition können die Grundlage für ein einheitliches Management bei Patienten/Patientinnen mit obstruktiver Schlafapnoe (OSA) sein, die auf eine PAP-Therapie eingestellt werden bzw. wurden.

Hypoglossal nerve stimulation therapy does not alter tongue protrusion strength and fatigability in obstructive sleep apnea

STUDY OBJECTIVES

Hypoglossal nerve stimulation (HNS) is an effective surgical alternative for patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). HNS therapy relies on the stimulation of the hypoglossal nerve to open the upper airways. This stimulation could lead to alterations in tongue strength and fatigability, which could alter treatment outcome over time. The aim of the study was to investigate whether HNS alters tongue strength and fatigability.

METHODS

Tongue protrusion strength (peak pressure in kPa) and fatigability (time to task failure during 50% of peak pressure contraction) were measured with a pressure transducer at least 2 months after HNS implantation (n = 30). These results were compared to a group of patients with OSA (n = 38) and a non-OSA control group (n = 35).

RESULTS

Median tongue protrusion strength was lower (54.7 [43.8, 63.0] versus 60.7 [53.7, 66.0] kPa, P = .013) and fatigue occurred more quickly (21.3 [17.4, 26.3] versus 26.0 [19.3, 31.3] seconds, P = .017) in the patients with OSA compared to the non-OSA control group. In multiple regression analysis, age was a significant factor for tongue strength and diagnosis of OSA for tongue fatigability. Tongue strength and fatigability did not differ between patients with OSA with conservative therapy or observation versus after HNS implantation (51.8 [41.3, 63.4] versus 56.3 [45.0, 62.3] kPa, P = .502; 20.8 [16.3, 26.2] versus 21.8 [18.3, 26.8] seconds, P = .418).

CONCLUSIONS

Tongue strength decreases with age. Tongue fatigability is more pronounced in people with OSA. However, approximately 1.5 years of HNS therapy on average does not alter tongue strength or fatigability compared to an OSA control group.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

Registry: ClinicalTrials.gov; Title: Change in Tongue Strength and Fatigue After Upper Airway Stimulation Therapy; Identifier: NCT03980158.

Results of the ADHERE upper airway stimulation registry and predictors of therapy efficacy

Objective/Hypothesis

The ADHERE Registry is a multicenter prospective observational study following outcomes of upper airway stimulation (UAS) therapy in patients who have failed continuous positive airway pressure therapy for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). The aim of this registry and purpose of this article were to examine the outcomes of patients receiving UAS for treatment of OSA.

Study Design

Cohort Study.

Methods

Demographic and sleep study data collection occurred at baseline, implantation visit, post‐titration (6 months), and final visit (12 months). Patient and physician reported outcomes were also collected. Post hoc univariate and multivariate analysis was used to identify predictors of therapy response, defined as ≥50% decrease in Apnea‐Hypopnea Index (AHI) and AHI ≤20 at the 12‐month visit.

Results

The registry has enrolled 1,017 patients from October 2016 through February 2019. Thus far, 640 patients have completed their 6‐month follow‐up and 382 have completed the 12‐month follow‐up. After 12 months, median AHI was reduced from 32.8 (interquartile range [IQR], 23.6–45.0) to 9.5 (IQR, 4.0–18.5); mean, 35.8 ± 15.4 to 14.2 ± 15.0, P < .0001. Epworth Sleepiness Scale was similarly improved from 11.0 (IQR, 7–16) to 7.0 (IQR, 4–11); mean, 11.4 ± 5.6 to 7.2 ± 4.8, P < .0001. Therapy usage was 5.6 ± 2.1 hours per night after 12 months. In a multivariate model, only female sex and lower baseline body mass index remained as significant predictors of therapy response.

Conclusions

Across a multi‐institutional study, UAS therapy continues to show significant improvement in subjective and objective OSA outcomes. This analysis shows that the therapy effect is durable and adherence is high.

Level of Evidence

2

Laryngoscope, 130:1333–1338, 2020

Long-term follow-up of the German post-market study for upper airway stimulation for obstructive sleep apnea

PURPOSE

Upper airway stimulation (UAS) is an effective treatment for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in positive airway pressure (PAP) failure. Most reports have presented short-term data, so long-term safety and efficacy reports are rare. The German post-market study (G-PMS) has followed approximately 60 patients from three implanting centers for several years.

METHODS

Patients with OSA and PAP failure qualified for the G-PMS by the absence of obesity class 2 an AHI between 15 and 65 events/h and absence of complete concentric collapse at the velum during drug-induced sleep endoscopy. Optional 2- and 3-year follow-ups after implantation were collected during routine clinical practice. We measured respiratory parameters such as apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) and oxygen desaturation index (ODI) and daytime sleepiness using the Epworth sleepiness scale (ESS) in a per protocol analysis. Usage was calculated from device-downloaded reports. Device-related complications were documented.

RESULTS

Of the 60 original patients, 41 returned for 2-year follow-up, and 38 for 3 years. About 76% at 2 years and 68% at 3 years met the criterion of therapy success defined as an AHI below 15/h. The median AHI was reduced from 28.6/h (baseline) to 9.0/h (2 years) and 10.0/h (3 years); whereas median ODI decreased from 27.0 to 6.3/h (2 years), and 8.3/h (3 years). Median ESS improved from baseline 13 points to 4 (2 years) and 6 (3 years). Usage was stable at approximately 45 h per week at 2 and 3 years. Serious device-related adverse events were rare, with two-device explantation between 12 to 36 months postoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

The German multi-center long-term outcomes compare favorably with previously published studies. Respiratory and sleepiness efficacy outcomes were sustained over 2 and 3 years, with a favorable safety profile, supporting the safety and efficacy of a chronic implantable therapy.

Phenotypes to Predict Response to Mandibular Advancement Device Therapy

CITATION

Heiser C. Phenotypes to predict response to mandibular advancement device therapy. JClin SleepMed. 2019;15(8):1073-1074.

Previous Surgery and Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulation for Obstructive Sleep Apnea

Objective

To examine whether previous palate or hypopharyngeal surgery was associated with efficacy of treatment of obstructive sleep apnea with hypoglossal nerve stimulation.

Study Design

Cohort (retrospective and prospective).

Setting

Eleven academic medical centers.

Subjects and Methods

Adults treated with hypoglossal nerve stimulation were enrolled in the ADHERE Registry. Outcomes were defined by the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI), in 3 ways: change in the AHI and 2 definitions of therapy response requiring ≥50% reduction in the AHI to a level <20 events/h (Response20) or 15 events/h (Response15). Previous palate and hypopharyngeal (tongue, epiglottis, or maxillofacial) procedures were documented. Linear and logistic regression examined the association between previous palate or hypopharyngeal surgery and outcomes, with adjustment for age, sex, and body mass index.

Results

The majority (73%, 217 of 299) had no previous palate or hypopharyngeal surgery, while 25% and 9% had previous palate or hypopharyngeal surgery, respectively, including 6% with previous palate and hypopharyngeal surgery. Baseline AHI (36.0 ± 15.6 events/h) decreased to 12.0 ± 13.3 at therapy titration ( P < .001) and 11.4 ± 12.6 at final follow-up ( P < .001). Any previous surgery, previous palate surgery, and previous hypopharyngeal surgery were not clearly associated with treatment response; for example, any previous surgery was associated with a 0.69 (95% CI: 0.37, 1.27) odds of response (Response20 measure) at therapy titration and a 0.55 (95% CI: 0.22, 1.34) odds of response (Response20 measure) at final follow-up.

Conclusion

Previous upper airway surgery was not clearly associated with efficacy of hypoglossal nerve stimulation.

[Stimulation for sleep apnea : Targeting the hypoglossal nerve in the treatment of patients with OSA]

Standard treatment of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is nightly application of positive airway pressure therapy (CPAP). However, adherence to CPAP is limited due to side effects and complications, and patients are frequently untreated or undertreated. In this scenario, patients with OSA are at risk of developing comorbidities such as arterial hypertension, coronary artery disease, or diabetes, and are exposed to an increased risk of experiencing traffic or occupational accidents due to daytime sleepiness. Alternative treatments include mandibular advancement devices or positional devices to prevent patients sleeping on their back, as well as anatomy-altering surgical procedures. For several years now, an additional surgical treatment-hypoglossal nerve stimulation-has been available for selected OSA patients. Hypoglossal nerve stimulation is a dynamic surgical approach that uses electrical stimulation to activate key muscles of the upper airway to achieve airway patency.

[Sonographic evaluation of anatomic landmarks in patients with obstructive sleep apnea]

BACKGROUND

In recent years, new key factors in the genesis of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) have been described. This has led to investigation of individualized therapeutic approaches in sleep medicine. The aim of the current study is assessment of the upper respiratory tract by sonographic measurement of various anatomic landmarks.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with rhonchopathy as well as OSA of different severity were included and compared to healthy volunteers. All patients underwent polygraphy for assessment of nocturnal respiratory disorders. Different landmarks were defined (extension of the tongue, thickness of the pharynx, hyoid bone-thyroid cartilage distance, extension of the geniohyoid muscle) which should be measured sonographically.

RESULTS

A total of 155 patients were enrolled and assigned to one of five groups (control; rhonchopathy; mild, moderate, and severe OSA). There were significant differences in the parameters for measuring tongue size, the distance between the hyoid bone and thyroid cartilage, and the thickness of the pharynx between the groups.

CONCLUSION

As part of this sonographic assessment of the upper respiratory tract, landmarks could be identified in patients with OSA that correlated with the severity of the disease.

Post-approval upper airway stimulation predictors of treatment effectiveness in the ADHERE registry

Upper airway stimulation (UAS) has been shown to reduce severity of obstructive sleep apnoea. The aim of this study was to identify predictors of UAS therapy response in an international multicentre registry.Patients who underwent UAS implantation in the United States and Germany were enrolled in an observational registry. Data collected included patient characteristics, apnoea/hypopnoea index (AHI), Epworth sleepiness scale (ESS), objective adherence, adverse events and patient satisfaction measures. Post hoc univariate and multiple logistic regression were performed to evaluate factors associated with treatment success.Between October 2016 and January 2018, 508 participants were enrolled from 14 centres. Median AHI was reduced from 34 to 7 events·h^-1, median ESS reduced from 12 to 7 from baseline to final visit at 12-month post-implant. In post hoc analyses, for each 1-year increase in age, there was a 4% increase in odds of treatment success. For each 1-unit increase in body mass index (BMI), there was 9% reduced odds of treatment success. In the multivariable model, age persisted in serving as statistically significant predictor of treatment success.In a large multicentre international registry, UAS is an effective treatment option with high patient satisfaction and low adverse events. Increasing age and reduced BMI are predictors of treatment response.

International consensus (ICON) on the ENT role in diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome

During the 2017 IFOS ENT World Congress, an international expert panel was asked to clarify the role of ENT in the diagnosis process of the obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSA) in adults around the world. OSA is a major public health issue throughout the world. OSA is a highly prevalent disease with heavy clinical, social and economical outcomes. This high prevalence raises serious difficulties of diagnosis accessibility if only somnologists are able to confirm OSA diagnosis. First of all, the panellists reviewed the impact of OSA. Secondly, they defined the ENT role stressing ENT legitimacy, professional expertise and academic and institutional tasks. They also defined when somnologists were necessary. For the international panel, the ENT is a major player in the OSA diagnosis process.