1
|
Massucco P, Fontana A, Mineccia M, Perotti S, Ciccone G, Galassi C, Giuffrida MC, Marino D, Monsellato I, Paris MK, Perinotti R, Racca P, Monagheddu C, Saccona F, Ponte E, Mistrangelo M, Santarelli M, Tomaselli F, Reddavid R, Birolo S, Calabrò M, Pipitone N, Panier Suffat L, Carrera M, Potente F, Brunetti M, Rimonda R, Adamo V, Piscioneri D, Cravero F, Serventi A, Giaminardi E, Mazza L, Bellora P, Colli F, De Rosa C, Battafarano F, Trapani R, Mellano A, Gibin E, Bellomo P. Prospective, randomised, multicentre, open-label trial, designed to evaluate the best timing of closure of the temporary ileostomy (early versus late) in patients who underwent rectal cancer resection and with indication for adjuvant chemotherapy: the STOMAD (STOMa closure before or after ADjuvant therapy) randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e044692. [PMID: 33608405 PMCID: PMC7896613 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044692] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Temporary ileostomy is a valuable aid in reducing the severity of complications related to rectal cancer surgery. However, it is still unclear what is the best timing of its closure in relation to the feasibility of an adjuvant treatment, especially considering patient-reported outcomes and health system costs. The aim of the study is to compare the results of an early versus late closure strategy in patients with indication to adjuvant chemotherapy after resection for rectal cancer. METHODS AND ANALYSIS This is a prospective multicentre randomised trial, sponsored by Rete Oncologica Piemonte e Valle d'Aosta (Oncology Network of Piedmont and Aosta Valley-Italy). Patients undergone to rectal cancer surgery with temporary ileostomy, aged >18 years, without evidence of anastomotic leak and with indication to adjuvant chemotherapy will be enrolled in 28 Network centres. An early closure strategy (between 30 and 40 days from rectal surgery) will be compared with a late one (after the end of adjuvant therapy). Primary endpoint will be the compliance to adjuvant chemotherapy with and without ileostomy. Complications associated with stoma closure as well as quality of life, costs and oncological outcomes will be assessed as secondary endpoints. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The trial will engage the Network professional teams in a common effort to improve the treatment of rectal cancer by ensuring the best results in relation to the most correct use of resources. It will take into consideration both the patients' point of view (patient-reported outcome) and the health system perspective (costs analysis). The study has been approved by the Ethical Review Board of Città della Salute e della Scienza Hospital in Turin (Italy). The results of the study will be disseminated by the Network website, medical conferences and peer-reviewed scientific journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT04372992.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paolo Massucco
- Department of General and Oncological Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliera Ordine Mauriziano, Torino, Italy
| | - Andrea Fontana
- Department of General and Oncological Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliera Ordine Mauriziano, Torino, Italy
| | - Michela Mineccia
- Department of General and Oncological Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliera Ordine Mauriziano, Torino, Italy
| | - Serena Perotti
- Department of General and Oncological Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliera Ordine Mauriziano, Torino, Italy
| | - Giovannino Ciccone
- Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Citta della Salute e della Scienza, Torino, Italy
| | - Claudia Galassi
- Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Citta della Salute e della Scienza, Torino, Italy
| | | | - Donatella Marino
- Department of Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliera Ordine Mauriziano, Torino, Italy
| | - Igor Monsellato
- Department of Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliera Nazionale SS Antonio e Biagio e C Arrigo, Alessandria, Italy
| | | | - Roberto Perinotti
- Department of Surgery, Ospedale degli Infermi, Ponderano (BI), Italy
| | - Patrizia Racca
- Colorectal Cancer Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Citta della Salute e della Scienza, Torino, Italy
| | - Chiara Monagheddu
- Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Citta della Salute e della Scienza, Torino, Italy
| | - Fabio Saccona
- Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Citta della Salute e della Scienza, Torino, Italy
| | - Elisa Ponte
- Department of Surgery, Ospedale Regionale Umberto Parini, Aosta, Italy
| | - Massimiliano Mistrangelo
- Department of Surgical Science, Turin University, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Citta della Salute e della Scienza, Torino, Italy
| | - Mauro Santarelli
- Department of General and Emergency Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Citta della Salute e della Scienza, Torino, Italy
| | | | - Rossella Reddavid
- Department of Surgical Oncology and Digestive Surgery, Turin University, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria San Luigi Gonzaga, Orbassano (TO), Italy
| | - Simone Birolo
- Department of Surgery, Ospedale degli Infermi, Rivoli (TO), Italy
| | - Marcello Calabrò
- Department of Surgery, Ospedale Edoardo Agnelli, Pinerolo (TO), Italy
| | | | | | - Monica Carrera
- Department of Surgery, Ospedale di Ciriè, Ciriè (TO), Italy
| | | | - Marco Brunetti
- Department of Surgery, Ospedale SS Annunziata, Savigliano (CN), Italy
| | - Roberto Rimonda
- Department of Surgery, Ospedale Regina Montis, Mondovì (CN), Italy
| | - Vincenzo Adamo
- Department of Surgery, Ospedale San Lazzaro, Alba (CN), Italy
| | - Domenico Piscioneri
- Department of Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliera Nazionale SS Antonio e Biagio e C Arrigo, Alessandria, Italy
| | - Francesca Cravero
- Department of Surgery, Ospedale Santo Spirito, Casale Monferrato (AL), Italy
| | - Alberto Serventi
- Department of Surgery, Ospedale Mons. Galliano, Acqui Terme (AL), Italy
| | - Eliana Giaminardi
- Department of Surgery, Ospedale San Giacomo, Novi Ligure (AL), Italy
| | - Luca Mazza
- Department of Surgery, Ospedale Cardinal Massaia, Asti, Italy
| | - Paolo Bellora
- Department of Surgery, Eastern Piedmont University, Azienda Ospedaliera Maggiore della Carita, Novara, Italy
| | - Fabio Colli
- Department of Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliera Maggiore della Carità, Novara, Italy
| | - Clemente De Rosa
- Department of Surgery, Presidio Ospedaliero Sant'Andrea, Vercelli, Italy
| | | | - Renza Trapani
- Department of Surgery, Ospedale Castelli, Verbania (VB), Italy
| | | | - Enrico Gibin
- Department of Surgery, Presidio Sanitario Ospedale Cottolengo, Torino, Italy
| | - Paola Bellomo
- Department of Surgery, Humanitas Gradenigo, Torino, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Neglia G, Gasparrini B, Di Palo R, De Rosa C, Zicarelli L, Campanile G. Comparison of pregnancy rates with two estrus synchronization protocols in Italian Mediterranean Buffalo cows. Theriogenology 2003; 60:125-33. [PMID: 12620586 DOI: 10.1016/s0093-691x(02)01328-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 83] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
The aim in this study was to compare two estrus synchronization protocols in buffaloes. Animals were divided into two groups: Group A (n=111) received 100 microg GnRH on Day 0, 375 microg PGF(2alpha) on Day 7 and 100 microg GnRH on Day 9 (Ovsynch); Group B (n=117) received an intravaginal drug release device (PRID) containing 1.55 g progesterone and a capsule with 10mg estradiol benzoate for 10 days and were treated with a luteolytic dose of PGF(2alpha) and 1000 IU PMSG at the time of PRID withdrawal. Animals were inseminated twice 18 and 42 h after the second injection of GnRH (Group A) and 60 and 84 h after PGF(2alpha) and PMSG injections (Group B). Progesterone (P(4)) concentrations in milk samples collected 12 and 2 days before treatments were used to determine cyclic and non-cyclic buffaloes, and milk P(4) concentrations 10 days after Artificial insemination (AI) were used as an index of a functional corpus luteum. Cows were palpated per rectum at 40 and 90 days after AI to determine pregnancies. All previously non-cyclic animals in Group B had elevated P(4) (>120 pg/ml milk whey) on Day 10 after AI. Accordingly, a greater (P<0.01) relative percentage of animals with elevated P(4) 10 days after AI were observed in Group B (93.2%) than in Group A (81.1%). However, there was no difference in overall pregnancy rates between the two estrus synchronization protocols (Group A, 36.0%; Group B 28.2%). When only animals with elevated P(4) on Day 10 after AI were considered, pregnancy rate was higher (P<0.05) for animals in Group A (44.4%) than Group B (30.3%). The findings indicated that treatment with PRID can induce ovulation in non-cyclic buffalo cows. However, synchronization of estrus with Ovsynch resulted in a higher pregnancy rate compared with synchronization with PRID, particularly in cyclic buffalo.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gianluca Neglia
- Dipartimento di Scienze Zootecnichee Ispezione degli Alimenti (DISCIZIA), Faculty of Veterinary Medicine-Federico II University, Naples 80137, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|