[Toric lens implantation in cataract surgery: Automatic versus manual horizontal axis marking, analysis of 50 cases]

SUBJECT

The main objective of our study is to evaluate the contribution of automated conjunctival recognition in the alignment of toric implants by comparing the automatic alignment optimized with Callisto™ to the manual marking of the horizontal axis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a prospective, descriptive, and monocentric study on patients undergoing cataract surgery with toric implantation (Asphina 709 Zeiss), operated by a surgeon with good experience in toricity, between September 2016 and March 2017. We analyzed the agreement between the manual marking of the 0°-180° axis versus the one automatically generated by the Callisto™, as well as the alignment of the IOL and the refractive results at 1 month.

RESULTS

We included 50 eyes of 26 patients. The corrected mean astigmatism was 1.9 D. The mean difference between the 2 axes was 4.7° [0°-12.3°]. Only 50 % of the preoperative manual markings were consistent with the automatic measurement (<5°). At one month, the average rotation recorded was 4.3° [0°-29°]. The alignment was identical for 70 % (n=35) of the IOL (≤5°). As for residual subjective astigmatism, it was on average 0.58 D. The mean visual acuity without correction was 8/10 and 55 % had 10/10 without correction.

DISCUSSION

The refractive performance depends on the preoperative measurement, the correct alignment of the IOL and its stability in the bag. Our study shows the value of automatic conjunctival recognition in the determination of the axis of peroperative alignment, even in an experienced operator. This precision is essential for a good refractive result, especially since the residual astigmatism in case of misalignment will increase with the power of the implant.

CONCLUSION

Our study shows excellent refractive results, whatever the initial astigmatism, using the automatic alignment. The precision of the toric implantation opens the way to the toric multifocal implantation under the best conditions.

Toric lens implantation in cataract surgery: Automated versus manual horizontal axis marking, analysis of 50 cases

SUBJECT

The main objective of our study was to evaluate the contribution of automated conjunctival registration in the alignment of toric intraocular lenses by comparing automated registration optimized with Callisto^® to manual marking of the horizontal axis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a prospective, descriptive, monocentric study on patients undergoing cataract surgery with a toric intraocular lens (Asphina 709 Zeiss), performed by a surgeon with good experience in toric implants, between September 2016 and March 2017. We analyzed the agreement between the manual marking of the 0-180° axis versus the one automatically generated by the Callisto™, as well as the alignment of the IOL and the refractive results at 1 month.

RESULTS

We included 50 eyes of 38 patients. The mean corrected astigmatism was 1,9 D. The mean difference between the 2 axes was 4,7° [0-12.3°]. Only 50 % of the preoperative manual markings were consistent with the automated measurement (<5°). At one month, the mean rotation recorded was 4,3° [0-29°]. The alignment was identical for 70 % (n=35) of the IOLs (≤5°). As for residual subjective astigmatism, the mean was 0.58 D. The mean visual acuity without correction was 8/10 and 55 % saw 10/10 without correction.

DISCUSSION

Refractive performance depends on preoperative measurement, correct alignment of the IOL and its stability in the bag. Our study shows the value of automated conjunctival registration in the determination of the intraoperative axis of alignment, even with an experienced surgeon. This precision is essential for a good refractive result, especially since residual astigmatism in the case of misalignment will increase with the power of the implant.

CONCLUSION

Our study shows excellent refractive results, regardless of the initial astigmatism, using automated alignment. Precision of toric implantation opens the way to toric multifocal implantation under the best conditions.

Repeated intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injections can induce iatrogenic ocular hypertension, especially in patients with open-angle glaucoma

OBJECTIVE

To report the rate of intraocular pressure (IOP) elevation after repeated intravitreal injections (IVIs) of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agents and to determine the risk factors.

METHODS

A total of 193 patients (217 eyes) undergoing ranibizumab (n = 196) or bevacizumab (n = 21) IVIs were prospectively examined. The incidence of ocular hypertension (OHT) after these injections was investigated with respect to the number of injections, pre-existing open-angle glaucoma, diabetes, YAG capsulotomy, age, and sex.

RESULTS

A total of 1461 IVIs was performed. After a mean of 6.7 ± 7.1 IVIs (range, 1-49), 4.6% (n = 10) had IOP elevation more than 25 mm Hg and required medical treatment (1.4% of them spiked above 30 mm Hg). Patients with pre-existing glaucoma experienced higher prevalence of OHT (12.9%) and greater rates than the control group (19.6 ± 5.7 mm Hg vs 16.4 ± 3.9 mm Hg, p < 0.001). No significant difference was found in the diabetes subgroup (n = 66, p = 0.62) or in the YAG capsulotomy subgroup (n = 24, p = 0.51) compared with the control group. The IOP peak was significantly correlated with the total number of IVIs (p = 0.0002, r = 0.25).

CONCLUSIONS

Serial IVIs may lead to persistent IOP elevation that requires IOP-lowering therapy. The risk is correlated with the number of injections and increases in the glaucoma population, and must be checked during follow-up.