Older age onset of systemic sclerosis - accelerated disease progression in all disease subsets

Objectives

Systemic sclerosis is a heterogeneous, multisystem disease. It can occur at any age, but most patients develop the disease between the age of 40 to 50 years. There is controversial evidence on whether/how the age at disease onset affects their clinical phenotype. We here investigate the relationship between age at disease onset and symptoms in a large cohort of SSc patients (lcSSc, dcSSc and SSc-overlap syndromes).

Methods

Clinical data of the registry of the German Network for Systemic Scleroderma including 3281 patients were evaluated and subdivided into three age groups at disease onset (<40 years, 40–60 years, >60 years).

Results

Among all SSc patients, 24.5% developed their first non-Raynaud phenomenon symptoms at the age <40 years, and 22.5% were older than 60 years of age. In particular, older patients at onset developed the lcSSc subset significantly more often. Furthermore, they had pulmonary hypertension more often, but digital ulcerations less often. Remarkably, the course of the disease was more rapidly progressing in the older cohort (>60 years), except for gastrointestinal and musculoskeletal involvement. No significant difference was found for the use of corticosteroids. However, significantly, fewer patients older than 60 years received immunosuppressive treatment.

Conclusion

In this large registry, ∼25% of patients developed SSc at an age above 60 years with an increased frequency of lcSSc. In this age group, an onset of internal organ involvement was significantly accelerated across all three subsets. These findings suggest that, in the elderly cohort, more frequent follow-up examinations are required for an earlier detection of organ complications.

[Reality of inpatient vasoactive treatment with prostacyclin derivatives in patients with acral circulation disorders due to systemic sclerosis in Germany]

Hintergrund

Das Raynaud-Phänomen und die damit häufig einhergehenden digitalen Ulzerationen stellen für Patienten mit systemischer Sklerose (Sklerodermie [SSc]) ein frühes und sehr belastendes Symptom mit bedeutenden Einschränkungen der Arbeitsfähigkeit und Lebensqualität dar. Der Einsatz vasoaktiver Medikamente (insbesondere intravenöser Prostazyklinderivate) soll helfen, das Risiko hypoxischer Gewebeschäden bis hin zum Verlust der Finger zu reduzieren.

Methoden

Um Aufschluss über die aktuelle Versorgung von Patienten mit Prostazyklinderivaten im klinischen Alltag in Deutschland zu erhalten, führten wir eine Umfrage unter den im Deutschen Netzwerk für systemische Sklerodermie (DNSS) zusammengeschlossenen Kliniken durch. Zusätzlich erfolgte eine separate Patientenbefragung über die Sklerodermie Selbsthilfe e. V., die sich nur auf die Symptome „Raynaud-Phänomen“ und „Digitale Ulzera“ und den Einsatz intravenöser Prostazyklinderivate bezog.

Ergebnisse

Von den befragten 433 Patienten gaben 56 % an, dass sie bereits aufgrund ihrer Erkrankung und Symptome mit Prostazyklinderivaten behandelt wurden. Insgesamt 61 % erhielten die Therapie aufgrund starker Raynaud-Symptomatik und 39 % aufgrund digitaler Ulzerationen. Die meisten Befragten erfuhren durch die Therapie nicht nur eine Verbesserung des Raynaud-Phänomens und der digitalen Ulzera, sondern auch eine wesentliche Verbesserung von Einschränkungen im Alltag. Sie gaben zudem an, wesentlich weniger fremde Hilfe in Anspruch genommen sowie wesentlich weniger Fehlzeiten bei der Arbeit gehabt zu haben.

Schlussfolgerung

Die Patienten empfanden durchweg einen positiven Effekt der Therapie mit Prostazyklinderivaten auf das Raynaud-Phänomen, ihre digitalen Ulzerationen, Schmerzen und Alltagseinschränkung und fühlten sich durch die stationäre Therapie gut und sicher betreut. Diese positiven Effekte in der Patientenwahrnehmung sind eine eindrückliche Stütze und bestätigen nachdrücklich die auf europäischer und internationaler Ebene erarbeiteten Therapieempfehlungen.

Zusatzmaterial online

Die Online-Version dieses Beitrags (10.1007/s00393-019-00743-9) enthält die 2 Fragebögen, die für die Befragung verwendet wurden. Beitrag und Zusatzmaterial stehen Ihnen auf www.springermedizin.de zur Verfügung. Bitte geben Sie dort den Beitragstitel in die Suche ein, das Zusatzmaterial finden Sie beim Beitrag unter „Ergänzende Inhalte“.

Diagnostic value of laboratory parameters for the discrimination between erysipelas and limited cellulitis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Erysipelas, caused by beta-hemolytic streptococci, and limited cellulitis, frequently caused by Staphylococcus aureus or other bacteria, are skin and soft tissue infections characterized by typical clinical signs. However, despite the therapeutical relevance they are often not differentiated (e.g in clinical trials). Erysipelas are efficiently treated with penicillin, while limited cellulitis is treated with more wide-spectrum antibiotics. This study investigates whether parameters such as CRP, blood counts or novel parameters like immature granulocytes could serve as biomarkers to distinguish between these entities.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

For this retrospective analysis 163 patients were included. We compared laboratory markers in patients with erysipelas (n = 68) to those with limited cellulitis (n = 41) of the leg. Both erysipelas and limited cellulitis were defined clinically, with an additional aspect for erysipelas being a prompt response to penicillin.

RESULTS

Erysipelas were characterized by higher levels of inflammation. CRP and leukocyte counts are the best parameters to discriminate between both infections. A CRP value ≥ 3.27 mg/dl indicated the diagnosis of erysipelas with 75 % sensitivity and 73.2 % specificity.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results support the thesis that erysipelas and limited cellulitis are distinct infections as defined in the German guidelines and that an assessment of CRP and leukocytes is useful for differential diagnosis.

AB0584 DOES ANTI-ACID TREATMENT INFLUENCE DISEASE PROGRESSION IN SYSTEMIC SCLEROSIS INTERSTITIAL LUNG DISEASE (SSC-ILD)? DATA FROM THE GERMAN SSC-NETWORK

Background:

Gastroesophageal reflux (GER) is common in SSc and thus treatment with anti-acid therapy (AAT) is frequent. An association between GER and the development / progression of SSc-ILD has been hypothesized. However, outcomes of AAT on disease progression in SSc-ILD has only sparsely been studied.

Objectives:

Methods:

The German Network for Systemic Scleroderma (DNSS), which includes SSc pts. prospectively, was analyzed for SSc-ILD. Those without progression at ILD 1stdiagnosis were categorized in AAT vs. no-AAT users and disease outcome was assessed.

Results:

SSc-ILD was reported in 1165 (28.2%) out of 4131 pts. 712 of SSc-ILD pts had no disease progression at ILD 1stdiagnosis. 567 used AAT while 145 did not. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups with regards to age (mean 54.7 years), BMI, time since SSc diagnosis and immunosuppressant use. Significant differences in no-AAT vs. AAT were found for gender (male 18% vs. 25%, p=0.05), SSc subtype (p=0.002, diffuse more common in AAT), lung function (DLCO 66% vs. 58%, p=0.001; FVC 86% vs. 77%, p=0.001), mRSS (8 vs. 11.5, p<0.01), esophageal involvement (32% vs. 56%, p<0.01) and steroid use (30% vs. 43%, p=0.005). While mortality did not differ between groups (3.9%, p= 0.59), disease progression was more common in the AAT group than in no-AAT users (24.5% vs. 13%, p=0.03). Furthermore, there was a significant difference in decline of FVC≥10% with 30% in the AAT compared to 14% in no-AAT (p=0.018); a decline in DLCO≥15% was more common in the AAT group by trend (23% vs. 14%, p=0.087).

Conclusion:

While results may have partially been biased by differences in baseline characteristics, this current analysis disfavors the approach of AAT use for SSc-ILD.

Disclosure of Interests:

Michael Kreuter Grant/research support from: Roche, Boehringer, Consultant of: Roche, Boehringer, Speakers bureau: Boehringer, Roche, Francesco Bonella Grant/research support from: Boehringer, Consultant of: Boehringer, Roche, Bristol MS, Galapagos, Speakers bureau: Boehringer, Roche, Gabriela Riemekasten Consultant of: Cell Trend GmbH, Janssen, Actelion, Boehringer Ingelheim, Speakers bureau: Actelion, Novartis, Janssen, Roche, GlaxoSmithKline, Boehringer Ingelheim, Pfizer, Ulf Müller-Ladner Speakers bureau: Biogen, Jörg Henes Grant/research support from: Novartis, Roche-Chugai, Consultant of: Novartis, Roche, Celgene, Pfizer, Abbvie, Sanofi, Boehringer-Ingelheim,, Elise Siegert Grant/research support from: Actelion, Consultant of: AEC, Speakers bureau: NA, Claudia Guenther: None declared, Ina Koetter Grant/research support from: Novartis, Roche, Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Actelion, Celgene, MSD, UCB, Sanofi, Lilly, Pfizer, Novartis, Chugai, Roche, Boehringer, Norbert Blank Speakers bureau: Actelion, Roche, Boehringer, Pfizer, Chugai, Christiane Pfeiffer: None declared, Marc Schmalzing: None declared, Gabriele Zeidler: None declared, PETER KORSTEN Grant/research support from: Novartis, Juarms GmbH, Consultant of: Abbvie, Pfizer, Lilly, BMS, Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Pfizer, chugai, BMS, Lilly, Sanofi aventis, Laura Susok: None declared, Aaron Juche: None declared, Margitta Worm Consultant of: Mylan Gemany, Bencard Allergie, BBV Technologies S.A., Novartis, Biotest, Sanofi, Aimmune Therapies, Regeneron, Speakers bureau: ALK-Abello, Novartis, Sanofi, Biotest, Mylan, Actelion, HAL Allergie, Aimmune Bencard Allergie, Ilona Jandova: None declared, Jan Ehrchen: None declared, Cord Sunderkoetter: None declared, Gernot Keyszer: None declared, Andreas Ramming Grant/research support from: Pfizer, Novartis, Consultant of: Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis, Gilead, Pfizer, Speakers bureau: Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, Janssen, Tim Schmeiser Speakers bureau: Actelion, UCB, Pfizer, Alexander Kreuter Speakers bureau: Sanofi, Abbvie, Merck Sharp&Dohme, Boehringer, Kathrin Kuhr: None declared, Hanns-Martin Lorenz Grant/research support from: Consultancy and/or speaker fees and/or travel reimbursements: Abbvie, MSD, BMS, Pfizer, Celgene, Medac, GSK, Roche, Chugai, Novartis, UCB, Janssen-Cilag, Astra-Zeneca, Lilly. Scientific support and/or educational seminars and/or clinical studies: Abbvie, MSD, BMS, Pfizer, Celgene, Medac, GSK, Roche, Chugai, Novartis, UCB, Janssen-Cilag, Astra-Zeneca, Lilly, Baxter, SOBI, Biogen, Actelion, Bayer Vital, Shire, Octapharm, Sanofi, Hexal, Mundipharm, Thermo Fisher., Consultant of: see above, Pia Moinzadeh: None declared, Nicolas Hunzelmann Speakers bureau: Actelion, Boehringer

Scleroderma Renal Crisis: Risk Factors for an Increasingly Rare Organ Complication

OBJECTIVE

Scleroderma renal crisis (SRC) is a severe life-threatening manifestation in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc). However, the knowledge about risk factors for SRC is limited. We determined here the frequency of SRC and identified risk factors for the prediction of SRC.

METHODS

Based on regular followup data from the German Network for Systemic Scleroderma, we used univariate and multivariate generalized estimating equations to analyze the association between clinical variables, SSc subsets, therapy [i.e., angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi), corticosteroids], and the occurrence of SRC.

RESULTS

Data of 2873 patients with 10,425 visits were available for analysis with a mean number of registry visits of 3.6 ± 2.8 and a mean time of followup of 3.6 ± 3.8 years. In total, 70 patients developed SRC (70/2873, 2.4%). Of these patients, 57.1% (40/70) were diagnosed with diffuse cutaneous SSc, 31.4% (22/70) with limited cutaneous SSc, and 11.4% (8/70) with SSc-overlap syndromes. Predictive independent factors with the highest probability for SRC were positive anti-RNA polymerase antibodies (RNAP), a history of proteinuria prior to SRC onset, diminished DLCO, and a history of hypertension. Interestingly, positive antitopoisomerase autoantibodies did not predict a higher risk for SRC. Further, patients with SRC were significantly more frequently treated with ACEi and corticosteroids without being independently associated with SRC.

CONCLUSION

In this cohort, SRC has become a rare complication. By far the highest risk for SRC was associated with the detection of anti-RNAP and proteinuria.

Vasoactive Therapy in Systemic Sclerosis: Real-life Therapeutic Practice in More Than 3000 Patients

OBJECTIVE

Vasculopathy is a key factor in the pathophysiology of systemic sclerosis (SSc) and the main cause for Raynaud phenomenon (RP), digital ulcers (DU), and/or pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). It is so far unknown how patients with SSc are treated with vasoactive agents in daily practice. To determine to which extent patients with SSc were treated with different vasoactive agents, we used data from the German Network for Systemic Scleroderma registry.

METHODS

The data of 3248 patients with SSc were analyzed.

RESULTS

Patients were treated with vasoactive drugs in 61.1% of cases (1984/3248). Of these, 47.6% received calcium channel inhibitors, followed by 34.2% treated with angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, 21.1% treated with intravenous (IV) prostanoids, 10.1% with pentoxifylline, 8.8% with angiotensin 1 receptor antagonists (AT1RA), 8.7% with endothelin 1 receptor antagonists (ET1RA), 4.1% with phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5) inhibitors, and 5.3% with others. Patients with RP received vasoactive therapy in 63.3% of cases, with DU in 70.1%, and with PAH in 78.2% of cases. Logistic regression analysis revealed that patients with PAH were significantly more often treated with PDE5 inhibitors and ET1RA, and those with DU with ET1RA and IV prostanoids. In addition, 41.8% of patients were treated with ACE inhibitors and/or AT1RA. Patients registered after 2009 received significantly more often ET1RA, AT1RA, and IV prostanoids compared with patients registered prior to 2005.

CONCLUSION

These data clearly indicate that many patients with SSc do not yet receive sufficient vasoactive therapy. Further, in recent years, a marked change of treatment regimens can be observed.

Single amino acid charge switch defines clinically distinct proline-serine-threonine phosphatase-interacting protein 1 (PSTPIP1)-associated inflammatory diseases

BACKGROUND

Hyperzincemia and hypercalprotectinemia (Hz/Hc) is a distinct autoinflammatory entity involving extremely high serum concentrations of the proinflammatory alarmin myeloid-related protein (MRP) 8/14 (S100A8/S100A9 and calprotectin).

OBJECTIVE

We sought to characterize the genetic cause and clinical spectrum of Hz/Hc.

METHODS

Proline-serine-threonine phosphatase-interacting protein 1 (PSTPIP1) gene sequencing was performed in 14 patients with Hz/Hc, and their clinical phenotype was compared with that of 11 patients with pyogenic arthritis, pyoderma gangrenosum, and acne (PAPA) syndrome. PSTPIP1-pyrin interactions were analyzed by means of immunoprecipitation and Western blotting. A structural model of the PSTPIP1 dimer was generated. Cytokine profiles were analyzed by using the multiplex immunoassay, and MRP8/14 serum concentrations were analyzed by using an ELISA.

RESULTS

Thirteen patients were heterozygous for a missense mutation in the PSTPIP1 gene, resulting in a p.E250K mutation, and 1 carried a mutation resulting in p.E257K. Both mutations substantially alter the electrostatic potential of the PSTPIP1 dimer model in a region critical for protein-protein interaction. Patients with Hz/Hc have extremely high MRP8/14 concentrations (2045 ± 1300 μg/mL) compared with those with PAPA syndrome (116 ± 74 μg/mL) and have a distinct clinical phenotype. A specific cytokine profile is associated with Hz/Hc. Hz/Hc mutations altered protein binding of PSTPIP1, increasing interaction with pyrin through phosphorylation of PSTPIP1.

CONCLUSION

Mutations resulting in charge reversal in the y-domain of PSTPIP1 (E→K) and increased interaction with pyrin cause a distinct autoinflammatory disorder defined by clinical and biochemical features not found in patients with PAPA syndrome, indicating a unique genotype-phenotype correlation for mutations in the PSTPIP1 gene. This is the first inborn autoinflammatory syndrome in which inflammation is driven by uncontrolled release of members of the alarmin family.

Disease progression in systemic sclerosis-overlap syndrome is significantly different from limited and diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis

BACKGROUND

Systemic sclerosis (SSc)-overlap syndromes are a very heterogeneous and remarkable subgroup of SSc-patients, who present at least two connective tissue diseases (CTD) at the same time, usually with a specific autoantibody status.

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether patients, classified as overlap syndromes, show a disease course different from patients with limited SSc (lcSSc) or diffuse cutaneous SSc (dcSSc).

METHODS

The data of 3240 prospectively included patients, registered in the database of the German Network for Systemic Scleroderma and followed between 2003 and 2013, were analysed.

RESULTS

Among 3240 registered patients, 10% were diagnosed as SSc-overlap syndrome. Of these, 82.5% were female. SSc-overlap patients had a mean age of 48±1.2 years and carried significantly more often 'other antibodies' (68.0%; p<0.0001), including anti-U1RNP, -PmScl, -Ro, -La, as well as anti-Jo-1 and -Ku antibodies. These patients developed musculoskeletal involvement earlier and more frequently (62.5%) than patients diagnosed as lcSSc (32.2%) or dcSSc (43.3%) (p<0.0001). The onset of lung fibrosis and heart involvement in SSc-overlap patients was significantly earlier than in patients with lcSSc and occurred later than in patients with dcSSc. Oesophagus, kidney and PH progression was similar to lcSSc patients, whereas dcSSc patients had a significantly earlier onset.

CONCLUSIONS

These data support the concept that SSc-overlap syndromes should be regarded as a separate SSc subset, distinct from lcSSc and dcSSc, due to a different progression of the disease, different proportional distribution of specific autoantibodies, and of different organ involvement.

Induction of an anti-inflammatory human monocyte subtype is a unique property of glucocorticoids, but can be modified by IL-6 and IL-10

Glucocorticoids (GC) are the most widely used immunosuppressive agents in clinical medicine. Recently we showed that GC enhance survival of human monocytes and induce a specific anti-inflammatory monocyte subtype which actively induces resolution of inflammation. We now investigated if cytokines IL-4, IL-6 and IL-10, which, like GC, have mostly anti-inflammatory effects on macrophages, would have GC-like effects also on monocytes. Human monocytes were stimulated with either cytokine, GC or combination thereof, and resulting effects on apoptosis, adherence, migration, phagocytosis, ROS production and cell surface phenotype were determined. We found that IL-4, IL-6, and IL-10 had either less or different effects on various anti-inflammatory functions of monocytes compared to GC. As such, IL-4 and IL-6 alone did not delay apoptosis while IL-10 even enhanced it. However, IL-6 or IL-10 increased GC-mediated protection from apoptosis when applied together with GC. Thus, the potential of GC to induce anti-inflammatory human monocytes is unique and not mimicked by the investigated cytokines. However, IL-6 and IL-10 amplify GC-induced anti-inflammatory and pro-resolution mechanisms by enhancing survival of GC-induced monocytes and thus sustaining their function. This combined effect of GC and cytokines could be important for the physiological switch from amplification towards resolution phase of inflammation.

High frequency of corticosteroid and immunosuppressive therapy in patients with systemic sclerosis despite limited evidence for efficacy

Introduction

In systemic sclerosis (SSc) little evidence for the effectiveness of anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive therapy exists. The objective of this study was to determine the extent to which SSc patients are treated with corticosteroids and immunosuppressive agents.

Methods

Data on duration and dosage of corticosteroids and on the type of immunosuppressive agent were analyzed from 1,729 patients who were registered in the German Network for Systemic Scleroderma (DNSS).

Results

A total 41.3% of all registered SSc patients was treated with corticosteroids. Corticosteroid use was reported in 49.1% of patients with diffuse cutaneous SSc and 31.3% of patients with limited cutaneous SSc (P < 0.0001). Among patients with overlap disease characteristics, 63.5% received corticosteroids (P < 0.0001 vs. limited cutaneous SSc). A total 16.1% of the patients received corticosteroids with a daily dose ≥ 15 mg prednisone equivalent. Immunosuppressive therapy was prescribed in 35.8% of patients. Again, among those patients with overlap symptoms, a much higher proportion (64.1%) was treated with immunosuppressive agents, compared with 46.4% of those with diffuse cutaneous SSc sclerosis and 22.2% of those with limited cutaneous SSc (P < 0.0001). The most commonly prescribed drugs were methotrexate (30.5%), cyclophosphamide (22.2%), azathioprine (21.8%) and (hydroxy)chloroquine (7.2%). The use of these compounds varied significantly between medical subspecialties.

Conclusions

Despite limited evidence for the effectiveness of corticosteroids and immunosuppressive agents in SSc, these potentially harmful drugs are frequently prescribed to patients with all forms of SSc. Therefore, this study indicates the need to develop and communicate adequate treatment recommendations.

Skin sclerosis is only of limited value to identify SSc patients with severe manifestations--an analysis of a distinct patient subgroup of the German Systemic Sclerosis Network (DNSS) Register

OBJECTIVES

In SSc, diagnosis and classification is based mainly on skin sclerosis. Herein, we investigated in a large multicentre cohort, to what extent skin sclerosis reflects organ involvement and additional clinical symptoms.

METHODS

A total of 1200 SSc patients from the register of the German Systemic Sclerosis Network (DNSS), classified as either lcSSc or dcSSc, were analysed for their serological characteristics, clinical symptoms and organ manifestations in relation to skin involvement measured by the modified Rodnan skin score (mRSS).

RESULTS

SSc patients with different mRSS did not differ significantly in their disease duration and in most of the clinical symptoms. They showed a similar distribution of most organ manifestations such as pulmonary arterial hypertension as well as cardiac, renal and nervous system involvement. More severe skin thickening was found to be associated with pulmonary fibrosis and gastrointestinal symptoms, as well as with digital ulcers and musculoskeletal involvement.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with SSc, potentially life-threatening complications and clinical symptoms with high impact on the quality of life occur independently from the extent of skin sclerosis. The diagnosis in SSc patients with a low mRSS could be missed or they could be insufficiently treated.

Glucocorticoids induce an activated, anti-inflammatory monocyte subset in mice that resembles myeloid-derived suppressor cells

Glucocorticoids (GC) are still the most widely used immunosuppressive agents in clinical medicine. Surprisingly, little is known about the mechanisms of GC action on monocytes, although these cells exert pro- and anti-inflammatory effects. We have shown recently that GC induce a specific monocyte phenotype with anti-inflammatory properties in humans. We now investigated whether this also applies for the murine system and how this subset would relate to recently defined murine subtypes. After treatment with dexamethasone for 48 h, monocytes up-regulated scavenger receptor CD163 and Gr-1, down-regulated CX(3)CR1, and shared with human GC-treated monocytes functional features such as low adhesiveness but high migratory capacity. They specifically up-regulated anti-inflammatory IL-10, but not TGF-beta, and in contrast to their human counterparts, they down-regulated IL-6. Although GC-induced monocytes down-regulated CX(3)CR1, a distinctive marker for classical/proinflammatory human and murine monocytes (CX(3)CR1(lo)CCR2(+)Ly6C(hi)), they differed from this physiologically occurring subset, as they remained Ly6C(med) and unactivated (CD62 ligand(++)). In addition to their immunosuppressive effects, they were CD11b(+)Gr-1(+) and expressed the IL-4Ralpha chain (CD124), a recently described, signature molecule of tumor-induced myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC). We therefore generated murine MDSC in B16 melanoma-bearing mice and indeed found parallel up-regulation of CD11b(+)Gr-1(+) and CD124 on GC-induced monocytes and MDSC. These data allow us to speculate that the GC-induced subtype shares with inflammatory monocytes the ability to migrate quickly into inflamed tissue, where they, however, exert anti-inflammatory effects and that similarities between GC-induced monocytes and MDSC may be involved in progression of some tumors observed in patients chronically treated with GC.

The registry of the German Network for Systemic Scleroderma: frequency of disease subsets and patterns of organ involvement

Objective. Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a rare, heterogeneous disease, which affects different organs and therefore requires interdisciplinary diagnostic and therapeutic management. To improve the detection and follow-up of patients presenting with different disease manifestations, an interdisciplinary registry was founded with contributions from different subspecialties involved in the care of patients with SSc.

Methods. A questionnaire was developed to collect a core set of clinical data to determine the current disease status. Patients were grouped into five descriptive disease subsets, i.e. lcSSc, dcSSc, SSc sine scleroderma, overlap-syndrome and UCTD with scleroderma features.

Results. Of the 1483 patients, 45.5% of patients had lcSSc and 32.7% dcSSc. Overlap syndrome was diagnosed in 10.9% of patients, while 8.8% had an undifferentiated form. SSc sine scleroderma was present in 1.5% of patients. Organ involvement was markedly different between subsets; pulmonary fibrosis for instance was significantly more frequent in dcSSc (56.1%) than in overlap syndrome (30.6%) or lcSSc (20.8%). Pulmonary hypertension was more common in dcSSc (18.5%) compared with lcSSc (14.9%), overlap syndrome (8.2%) and undifferentiated disease (4.1%). Musculoskeletal involvement was typical for overlap syndromes (67.6%). A family history of rheumatic disease was reported in 17.2% of patients and was associated with early disease onset (P < 0.005).

Conclusion. In this nationwide register, a descriptive classification of patients with disease manifestations characteristic of SSc in five groups allows to include a broader spectrum of patients with features of SSc.

Uptake of Leishmania major by dendritic cells is mediated by Fcgamma receptors and facilitates acquisition of protective immunity

Uptake of Leishmania major by dendritic cells (DCs) results in activation and interleukin (IL)-12 release. Infected DCs efficiently stimulate CD4- and CD8- T cells and vaccinate against leishmaniasis. In contrast, complement receptor 3-dependent phagocytosis of L. major by macrophages (MPhi) leads exclusively to MHC class II-restricted antigen presentation to primed, but not naive, T cells, and no IL-12 production. Herein, we demonstrate that uptake of L. major by DCs required parasite-reactive immunoglobulin (Ig)G and involved FcgammaRI and FcgammaRIII. In vivo, DC infiltration of L. major-infected skin lesions coincided with the appearance of antibodies in sera. Skin of infected B cell-deficient mice and Fcgamma-/- mice contained fewer parasite-infected DCs in vivo. Infected B cell-deficient mice as well as Fcgamma-/- mice (all on the C57BL/6 background) showed similarly increased disease susceptibility as assessed by lesion volumes and parasite burdens. The B cell-deficient mice displayed impaired T cell priming and dramatically reduced IFN-gamma production, and these deficits were normalized by infection with IgG-opsonized parasites. These data demonstrate that DC and MPhi use different receptors to recognize and ingest L. major with different outcomes, and indicate that B cell-derived, parasite-reactive IgG and DC FcgammaRI and FcgammaRIII are essential for optimal development of protective immunity.