Side-by-side comparison of the two widely studied GRPR radiotracers, radiolabeled NeoB and RM2, in a preclinical setting.
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2023;
50:3851-3861. [PMID:
37584725 PMCID:
PMC10611828 DOI:
10.1007/s00259-023-06364-4]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2023] [Accepted: 07/24/2023] [Indexed: 08/17/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION
NeoB and RM2 are the most investigated gastrin-releasing peptide receptor (GRPR)-targeting radiotracers in preclinical and clinical studies. Therefore, an extensive side-by-side comparison of the two radiotracers is valuable to demonstrate whether one has advantages over the other. Accordingly, this study aims to compare the in vitro and in vivo characteristics of radiolabeled NeoB and RM2 to guide future clinical studies.
METHOD
The stability of the radiolabeled GRPR analogs was determined in phosphate buffered saline (PBS), and commercially available mouse and human serum. Target affinity was determined by incubating human prostate cancer PC-3 cells with [177Lu]Lu-NeoB or [177Lu]Lu-RM2, + / - increasing concentrations of unlabeled NeoB, RM2, or Tyr4-bombesin (BBN). To determine uptake and specificity cells were incubated with [177Lu]Lu-NeoB or [177Lu]Lu-RM2 + / - Tyr4-BBN. Moreover, in vivo studies were performed to determine biodistribution and pharmacokinetics. Finally, radiotracer binding to various GRPR-expressing human cancer tissues was investigated.
RESULTS
Both radiotracers demonstrated high stability in PBS and human serum, but stability in mouse serum decreased substantially over time. Moreover, both radiotracers demonstrated high GRPR affinity and specificity, but a higher uptake of [177Lu]Lu-NeoB was observed in in vitro studies. In vivo, no difference in tumor uptake was seen. The most prominent difference in uptake in physiological organs was observed in the GRPR-expressing pancreas; [177Lu]Lu-RM2 had less pancreatic uptake and a shorter pancreatic half-life than [177Lu]Lu-NeoB. Furthermore, [177Lu]Lu-RM2 presented with a lower tumor-to-kidney ratio, while the tumor-to-blood ratio was lower for [177Lu]Lu-NeoB. The autoradiography studies revealed higher binding of radiolabeled NeoB to all human tumor tissues.
CONCLUSION
Based on these findings, we conclude that the in vivo tumor-targeting capability of radiolabeled NeoB and RM2 is similar. Additional studies are needed to determine whether the differences observed in physiological organ uptakes, i.e., the pancreas, kidneys, and blood, result in relevant differences in organ absorbed doses when the radiotracers are applied for therapeutic purposes.
Collapse