1
|
Holzleitner N, Cwojdzinski T, Beck R, Urtz-Urban N, Hillhouse CC, Grundler PV, van der Meulen NP, Talip Z, Ramaekers S, Van de Voorde M, Ponsard B, Casini A, Günther T. Preclinical Evaluation of Gastrin-Releasing Peptide Receptor Antagonists Labeled with 161Tb and 177Lu: A Comparative Study. J Nucl Med 2024; 65:481-484. [PMID: 38124121 PMCID: PMC10924159 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.123.266233] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2023] [Revised: 11/09/2023] [Accepted: 11/09/2023] [Indexed: 12/23/2023] Open
Abstract
To elucidate potential benefits of the Auger-electron-emitting radionuclide 161Tb, we compared the preclinical performance of the gastrin-releasing peptide receptor antagonists RM2 (DOTA-Pip5-d-Phe6-Gln7-Trp8-Ala9-Val10-Gly11-His12-Sta13-Leu14-NH2) and AMTG (α-Me-Trp8-RM2), each labeled with both 177Lu and 161Tb. Methods: 161Tb/177Lu labeling (90°C, 5 min) and cell-based experiments (PC-3 cells) were performed. In vivo stability (30 min after injection) and biodistribution studies (1-72 h after injection) were performed on PC-3 tumor-bearing CB17-SCID mice. Results: Gastrin-releasing peptide receptor affinity was high for all compounds (half-maximal inhibitory concentration [nM]: [161Tb]Tb-RM2, 2.46 ± 0.16; [161Tb]Tb-AMTG, 2.16 ± 0.09; [177Lu]Lu-RM2, 3.45 ± 0.18; [177Lu]Lu-AMTG, 3.04 ± 0.08), and 75%-84% of cell-associated activity was receptor-bound. In vivo, both AMTG analogs displayed distinctly higher stability (30 min after injection) and noticeably higher tumor retention than their RM2 counterparts. Conclusion: On the basis of preclinical results, [161Tb]Tb-/[177Lu]Lu-AMTG might reveal a higher therapeutic efficacy than [161Tb]Tb-/[177Lu]Lu-RM2, particularly [161Tb]Tb-AMTG because of additional Auger-electron emissions at the cell membrane level.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nadine Holzleitner
- Department of Chemistry, School of Natural Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Garching, Germany
| | - Tatjana Cwojdzinski
- Department of Chemistry, School of Natural Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Garching, Germany
| | - Roswitha Beck
- Department of Chemistry, School of Natural Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Garching, Germany
| | - Nicole Urtz-Urban
- Department of Chemistry, School of Natural Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Garching, Germany
| | - Colin C Hillhouse
- Center for Radiopharmaceutical Sciences ETH-PSI, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, Switzerland; and
| | - Pascal V Grundler
- Center for Radiopharmaceutical Sciences ETH-PSI, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, Switzerland; and
| | - Nicholas P van der Meulen
- Center for Radiopharmaceutical Sciences ETH-PSI, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, Switzerland; and
| | - Zeynep Talip
- Center for Radiopharmaceutical Sciences ETH-PSI, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, Switzerland; and
| | - Stijn Ramaekers
- Nuclear Medical Applications, Belgian Nuclear Research Centre, Mol, Belgium
| | | | - Bernard Ponsard
- Nuclear Medical Applications, Belgian Nuclear Research Centre, Mol, Belgium
| | - Angela Casini
- Department of Chemistry, School of Natural Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Garching, Germany;
| | - Thomas Günther
- Department of Chemistry, School of Natural Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Garching, Germany;
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ghezzo S, Mapelli P, Samanes Gajate AM, Palmisano A, Cucchiara V, Brembilla G, Bezzi C, Suardi N, Scifo P, Briganti A, De Cobelli F, Chiti A, Esposito A, Picchio M. Diagnostic accuracy of fully hybrid [ 68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/MRI and [ 68Ga]Ga- RM2 PET/MRI in patients with biochemically recurrent prostate cancer: a prospective single-center phase II clinical trial. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2024; 51:907-918. [PMID: 37897615 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-023-06483-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2023] [Accepted: 10/16/2023] [Indexed: 10/30/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To compare the diagnostic accuracy and detection rates of PET/MRI with [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 and [68Ga]Ga-M2 in patients with biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer (PCa). METHODS Sixty patients were enrolled in this prospective single-center phase II clinical trial from June 2020 to October 2022. Forty-four/60 completed all study examinations and were available at follow-up (median: 22.8 months, range: 6-31.5 months). Two nuclear medicine physicians analyzed PET images and two radiologists interpreted MRI; images were then re-examined to produce an integrated PET/MRI report for both [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 and [68Ga]Ga-RM2 examinations. A composite reference standard including histological specimens, response to treatment, and conventional imaging gathered during follow-up was used to validate imaging findings. Detection rates, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive, and negative predictive value were assessed. McNemar's test was used to compare sensitivity and specificity on a per-patient base and detection rate on a per-region base. Prostate bed, locoregional lymph nodes, non-skeletal distant metastases, and bone metastases were considered. p-value significance was defined below the 0.05 level after correction for multiple testing. RESULTS Patients' median age was 69.8 years (interquartile range (IQR): 61.8-75.1) and median PSA level at time of imaging was 0.53 ng/mL (IQR: 0.33-2.04). During follow-up, evidence of recurrence was observed in 31/44 patients. Combining MRI with [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET and [68Ga]Ga-RM2 PET resulted in sensitivity = 100% and 93.5% and specificity of 69.2% and 69.2%, respectively. When considering the individual imaging modalities, [68Ga]Ga-RM2 PET showed lower sensitivity compared to [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET and MRI (61.3% vs 83.9% and 87.1%, p = 0.046 and 0.043, respectively), while specificity was comparable among the imaging modalities (100% vs 84.6% and 69.2%, p = 0.479 and 0.134, respectively). CONCLUSION This study brings further evidence on the utility of fully hybrid PET/MRI for disease characterization in patients with biochemically recurrent PCa. Imaging with [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET showed high sensitivity, while the utility of [68Ga]Ga-RM2 PET in absence of a simultaneous whole-body/multiparametric MRI remains to be determined.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samuele Ghezzo
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Via Olgettina 58, 20132, Milan, Italy
- Nuclear Medicine Department, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - Paola Mapelli
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Via Olgettina 58, 20132, Milan, Italy
- Nuclear Medicine Department, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - Ana Maria Samanes Gajate
- Nuclear Medicine Department, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - Anna Palmisano
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Via Olgettina 58, 20132, Milan, Italy
- Department of Radiology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - Vito Cucchiara
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Via Olgettina 58, 20132, Milan, Italy
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - Giorgio Brembilla
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Via Olgettina 58, 20132, Milan, Italy
- Department of Radiology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - Carolina Bezzi
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Via Olgettina 58, 20132, Milan, Italy
- Nuclear Medicine Department, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - Nazareno Suardi
- IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, University of Genoa, Largo Benzi 10, 16132, Genoa, Italy
| | - Paola Scifo
- Nuclear Medicine Department, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Via Olgettina 58, 20132, Milan, Italy
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco De Cobelli
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Via Olgettina 58, 20132, Milan, Italy
- Department of Radiology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - Arturo Chiti
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Via Olgettina 58, 20132, Milan, Italy
- Nuclear Medicine Department, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - Antonio Esposito
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Via Olgettina 58, 20132, Milan, Italy
- Department of Radiology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - Maria Picchio
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Via Olgettina 58, 20132, Milan, Italy.
- Nuclear Medicine Department, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Damiana TST, Paraïso P, de Ridder C, Stuurman D, Seimbille Y, Dalm SU. Side-by-side comparison of the two widely studied GRPR radiotracers, radiolabeled NeoB and RM2, in a preclinical setting. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2023; 50:3851-3861. [PMID: 37584725 PMCID: PMC10611828 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-023-06364-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2023] [Accepted: 07/24/2023] [Indexed: 08/17/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION NeoB and RM2 are the most investigated gastrin-releasing peptide receptor (GRPR)-targeting radiotracers in preclinical and clinical studies. Therefore, an extensive side-by-side comparison of the two radiotracers is valuable to demonstrate whether one has advantages over the other. Accordingly, this study aims to compare the in vitro and in vivo characteristics of radiolabeled NeoB and RM2 to guide future clinical studies. METHOD The stability of the radiolabeled GRPR analogs was determined in phosphate buffered saline (PBS), and commercially available mouse and human serum. Target affinity was determined by incubating human prostate cancer PC-3 cells with [177Lu]Lu-NeoB or [177Lu]Lu-RM2, + / - increasing concentrations of unlabeled NeoB, RM2, or Tyr4-bombesin (BBN). To determine uptake and specificity cells were incubated with [177Lu]Lu-NeoB or [177Lu]Lu-RM2 + / - Tyr4-BBN. Moreover, in vivo studies were performed to determine biodistribution and pharmacokinetics. Finally, radiotracer binding to various GRPR-expressing human cancer tissues was investigated. RESULTS Both radiotracers demonstrated high stability in PBS and human serum, but stability in mouse serum decreased substantially over time. Moreover, both radiotracers demonstrated high GRPR affinity and specificity, but a higher uptake of [177Lu]Lu-NeoB was observed in in vitro studies. In vivo, no difference in tumor uptake was seen. The most prominent difference in uptake in physiological organs was observed in the GRPR-expressing pancreas; [177Lu]Lu-RM2 had less pancreatic uptake and a shorter pancreatic half-life than [177Lu]Lu-NeoB. Furthermore, [177Lu]Lu-RM2 presented with a lower tumor-to-kidney ratio, while the tumor-to-blood ratio was lower for [177Lu]Lu-NeoB. The autoradiography studies revealed higher binding of radiolabeled NeoB to all human tumor tissues. CONCLUSION Based on these findings, we conclude that the in vivo tumor-targeting capability of radiolabeled NeoB and RM2 is similar. Additional studies are needed to determine whether the differences observed in physiological organ uptakes, i.e., the pancreas, kidneys, and blood, result in relevant differences in organ absorbed doses when the radiotracers are applied for therapeutic purposes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T S T Damiana
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - P Paraïso
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - C de Ridder
- Department of Experimental Urology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - D Stuurman
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Y Seimbille
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - S U Dalm
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Wang Y, Yuan H, Tang S, Liu Y, Cai P, Liu N, Chen Y, Zhou Z. The effects of novel macrocyclic chelates on the targeting properties of the 68Ga-labeled Gastrin releasing peptide receptor antagonist RM2. EJNMMI Res 2023; 13:56. [PMID: 37285007 DOI: 10.1186/s13550-023-01005-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2023] [Accepted: 06/01/2023] [Indexed: 06/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The gastrin-releasing peptide receptor (GRPr) is a molecular target for the visualization of prostate cancer. Bombesin (BN) analogs are short peptides with a high affinity for GRPr. RM2 is a bombesin-based antagonist. It has been demonstrated that RM2 have superior in vivo biodistribution and targeting properties than high-affinity receptor agonists. This study developed new RM2-like antagonists by introducing the novel bifunctional chelators AAZTA5 and DATA5m to RM2. RESULTS The effects of different macrocyclic chelating groups on drug targeting properties and the possibility of preparing 68Ga-radiopharmaceuticals in a kit-based protocol were investigated using 68Ga-labeled entities. Both new RM2 variants were labelled with 68Ga3+ resulting in high yields, stability, and low molarity of the ligand. DATA5m-RM2 and AAZTA5-RM2 incorporated 68Ga3+ nearly quantitatively at room temperature within 3-5 min, and the labelling yield for 68Ga-DOTA-RM2 was approximately 10% under the same conditions. 68Ga-AAZTA5-RM2 showed stronger hydrophilicity according to partition coefficient. Although the maximal cellular uptake values of the three compounds were similar, 68Ga-AAZTA5-RM2 and 68Ga-DATA5m-RM2 peaked more rapidly. Biodistribution studies showed high and specific tumor uptake, with a maximum of 9.12 ± 0.81 percentage injected activity per gram of tissue (%ID/g) for 68Ga-DATA5m-RM2 and 7.82 ± 0.61%ID/g for 68Ga-AAZTA5-RM2 at 30 min after injection. CONCLUSIONS The conditions for complexation of DATA5m-RM2 and AAZTA5-RM2 with gallium-68 are milder, faster and require less amount of precursors than DOTA-RM2. Chelators had an evident influence on the pharmacokinetics and targeting properties of 68Ga-X-RM2 derivatives. Positively charged 68Ga-DATA5m-RM2 provided a high tumor uptake, high image contrast and good capability of targeting GRPr.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yinwen Wang
- The Department of Nuclear Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Jiangyang District, Luzhou, Sichuan, China
- Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Jiangyang District, Luzhou, Sichuan, China
- Department of Pharmaceutics, School of Pharmacy, Southwest Medical University, Jiangyang District, Luzhou, Sichuan, China
| | - Hongmei Yuan
- The Department of Nuclear Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Jiangyang District, Luzhou, Sichuan, China
- Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Jiangyang District, Luzhou, Sichuan, China
- Department of Pharmaceutics, School of Pharmacy, Southwest Medical University, Jiangyang District, Luzhou, Sichuan, China
| | - Sufan Tang
- The Department of Nuclear Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Jiangyang District, Luzhou, Sichuan, China
- Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Jiangyang District, Luzhou, Sichuan, China
- Department of Pharmaceutics, School of Pharmacy, Southwest Medical University, Jiangyang District, Luzhou, Sichuan, China
| | - Yang Liu
- The Department of Nuclear Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Jiangyang District, Luzhou, Sichuan, China
- Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Jiangyang District, Luzhou, Sichuan, China
- Institute of Nuclear Medicine, Southwest Medical University, Jiangyang District, Luzhou, Sichuan, China
| | - Ping Cai
- The Department of Nuclear Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Jiangyang District, Luzhou, Sichuan, China
- Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Jiangyang District, Luzhou, Sichuan, China
- Department of Pharmaceutics, School of Pharmacy, Southwest Medical University, Jiangyang District, Luzhou, Sichuan, China
| | - Nan Liu
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Yue Chen
- The Department of Nuclear Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Jiangyang District, Luzhou, Sichuan, China.
- Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Jiangyang District, Luzhou, Sichuan, China.
- Institute of Nuclear Medicine, Southwest Medical University, Jiangyang District, Luzhou, Sichuan, China.
| | - Zhijun Zhou
- The Department of Nuclear Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Jiangyang District, Luzhou, Sichuan, China.
- Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Jiangyang District, Luzhou, Sichuan, China.
- Department of Pharmaceutics, School of Pharmacy, Southwest Medical University, Jiangyang District, Luzhou, Sichuan, China.
- Institute of Nuclear Medicine, Southwest Medical University, Jiangyang District, Luzhou, Sichuan, China.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Günther T, Deiser S, Felber V, Beck R, Wester HJ. Substitution of l-Tryptophan by α-Methyl-l-Tryptophan in 177Lu- RM2 Results in 177Lu-AMTG, a High-Affinity Gastrin-Releasing Peptide Receptor Ligand with Improved In Vivo Stability. J Nucl Med 2022; 63:1364-1370. [PMID: 35027371 PMCID: PMC9454457 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.121.263323] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2021] [Revised: 12/28/2021] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Theranostic applications targeting the gastrin-releasing peptide receptor (GRPR) have shown promising results. When compared with other peptide ligands for radioligand therapy, the most often used GRPR ligand, DOTA-Pip5-d-Phe6-Gln7-Trp8-Ala9-Val10-Gly11-His12-Sta13-Leu14-NH2 (RM2), may be clinically impacted by limited metabolic stability. With the aim of improving the metabolic stability of RM2, we investigated whether the metabolically unstable Gln7-Trp8 bond within the pharmacophore of RM2 can be stabilized via substitution of l-Trp8 by α-methyl-l-tryptophan (α-Me-l-Trp) and whether the corresponding DOTAGA analog might also be advantageous. A comparative preclinical evaluation of 177Lu-α-Me-l-Trp8-RM2 (177Lu-AMTG) and its DOTAGA counterpart (177Lu-AMTG2) was performed using 177Lu-RM2 and 177Lu-NeoBOMB1 as reference compounds. Methods: Peptides were synthesized by solid-phase peptide synthesis and labeled with 177Lu. Lipophilicity was determined at pH 7.4 (logD 7.4). Receptor-mediated internalization was investigated on PC-3 cells (37°C, 60 min), whereas GRPR affinity (half-maximal inhibitory concentration) was determined on both PC-3 and T-47D cells. Stability toward peptidases was examined in vitro (human plasma, 37°C, 72 ± 2 h) and in vivo (murine plasma, 30 min after injection). Biodistribution studies were performed at 24 h after injection, and small-animal SPECT/CT was performed on PC-3 tumor-bearing mice at 1, 4, 8, 24, and 28 h after injection. Results: Solid-phase peptide synthesis yielded 9%-15% purified labeling precursors. 177Lu labeling proceeded quantitatively. Compared with 177Lu-RM2, 177Lu-AMTG showed slightly improved GRPR affinity, a similar low internalization rate, slightly increased lipophilicity, and considerably improved stability in vitro and in vivo. In vivo, 177Lu-AMTG exhibited the highest tumor retention (11.45 ± 0.43 percentage injected dose/g) and tumor-to-blood ratio (2,702 ± 321) at 24 h after injection, as well as a favorable biodistribution profile. As demonstrated by small-animal SPECT/CT imaging, 177Lu-AMTG also revealed a less rapid clearance from tumor tissue. Compared with 177Lu-AMTG, 177Lu-AMTG2 did not show any further benefits. Conclusion: The results of this study, particularly the superior metabolic stability of 177Lu-AMTG, strongly recommend a clinical evaluation of this novel GRPR-targeted ligand to investigate its potential for radioligand therapy of GRPR-expressing malignancies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Günther
- Chair of Pharmaceutical Radiochemistry, Technical University of Munich, Garching, Germany
| | - Sandra Deiser
- Chair of Pharmaceutical Radiochemistry, Technical University of Munich, Garching, Germany
| | - Veronika Felber
- Chair of Pharmaceutical Radiochemistry, Technical University of Munich, Garching, Germany
| | - Roswitha Beck
- Chair of Pharmaceutical Radiochemistry, Technical University of Munich, Garching, Germany
| | - Hans-Jürgen Wester
- Chair of Pharmaceutical Radiochemistry, Technical University of Munich, Garching, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Mapelli P, Ghezzo S, Samanes Gajate AM, Preza E, Palmisano A, Cucchiara V, Brembilla G, Bezzi C, Rigamonti R, Magnani P, Toninelli E, Bettinardi V, Suardi N, Gianolli L, Scifo P, Briganti A, De Cobelli F, Esposito A, Picchio M. 68Ga-PSMA and 68Ga-DOTA- RM2 PET/MRI in Recurrent Prostate Cancer: Diagnostic Performance and Association with Clinical and Histopathological Data. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14020334. [PMID: 35053499 PMCID: PMC8773792 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14020334] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2021] [Revised: 01/04/2022] [Accepted: 01/05/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Prostate cancer (PCa) relapse occurs in up to 50% of patients after radical treatment. Once PCa recurrence is detected, a precise identification of the number and sites of recurrence is necessary to tailor the treatment on the patient’s needs. Positron emission tomography (PET) plays a pivotal role in this clinical setting and new radiotracers have been developed to improve its performance. While 68Ga-PSMA is a well-established radiotracer for PCa recurrence detection, 68Ga-DOTA-RM2 is a recently proposed tracer that targets the gastrin-releasing peptide receptors that are overexpressed in prostate cancer. In this work, the performance of 68Ga-PSMA and 68Ga-DOTA-RM2 PET/MRI in identifying recurrent disease were compared on the same cohort, using the same study protocol, as this is the only way to assess whether one outperforms the other and therefore should be preferred in clinical practice. Furthermore, the association between PET findings and clinical and histopathological characteristics was investigated to find potential biomarkers. Abstract The aim of the present study is to investigate and compare the performances of 68Ga-PSMA and 68Ga-DOTA-RM2 PET/MRI in identifying recurrent prostate cancer (PCa) after primary treatment and to explore the association of dual-tracer PET findings with clinical and histopathological characteristics. Thirty-five patients with biochemical relapse (BCR) of PCa underwent 68Ga PSMA PET/MRI for restaging purpose, with 31/35 also undergoing 68Ga-DOTA-RM2 PET/MRI scan within 16 days (mean: 3 days, range: 2–16 days). Qualitative and quantitative image analysis has been performed by comparing 68Ga-PSMA and 68Ga-DOTA-RM2 PET/MRI findings both on a patient and lesion basis. Clinical and instrumental follow-up was used to validate PET findings. Fisher’s exact test and Mann-Whitney U test were used to investigate the association between dual-tracer PET findings, clinical and histopathological data. p-value significance was defined below the 0.05 level. Patients’ mean age was 70 years (range: 49–84) and mean PSA at time of PET/MR scans was 1.88 ng/mL (range: 0.21–14.4). A higher detection rate was observed for 68Ga-PSMA PET/MRI, with more lesions being detected compared to 68Ga-DOTA-RM2 PET/MRI (26/35 patients, 95 lesions vs. 15/31 patients, 41 lesions; p = 0.016 and 0.002). 68Ga-PSMA and 68Ga-DOTA-RM2 PET/MRI findings were discordant in 11/31 patients; among these, 10 were 68Ga-PSMA positive (9/10 confirmed as true positive and 1/10 as false positive by follow-up examination). Patients with higher levels of PSA and shorter PSA doubling time (DT) presented more lesions on 68Ga-PSMA PET/MRI (p = 0.006 and 0.044), while no association was found between PET findings and Gleason score. 68Ga-PSMA has a higher detection rate than 68Ga-DOTA-RM2 in detecting PCa recurrence. The number of 68Ga-PSMA PET positive lesions is associated with higher levels of PSA and shorter PSA DT, thus representing potential prognostic factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paola Mapelli
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Via Olgettina 60, 20132 Milan, Italy; (P.M.); (S.G.); (A.P.); (V.C.); (G.B.); (C.B.); (E.T.); (A.B.); (F.D.C.); (A.E.)
- Nuclear Medicine Department, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132 Milan, Italy; (A.M.S.G.); (E.P.); (R.R.); (P.M.); (V.B.); (L.G.); (P.S.)
| | - Samuele Ghezzo
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Via Olgettina 60, 20132 Milan, Italy; (P.M.); (S.G.); (A.P.); (V.C.); (G.B.); (C.B.); (E.T.); (A.B.); (F.D.C.); (A.E.)
| | - Ana Maria Samanes Gajate
- Nuclear Medicine Department, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132 Milan, Italy; (A.M.S.G.); (E.P.); (R.R.); (P.M.); (V.B.); (L.G.); (P.S.)
| | - Erik Preza
- Nuclear Medicine Department, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132 Milan, Italy; (A.M.S.G.); (E.P.); (R.R.); (P.M.); (V.B.); (L.G.); (P.S.)
| | - Anna Palmisano
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Via Olgettina 60, 20132 Milan, Italy; (P.M.); (S.G.); (A.P.); (V.C.); (G.B.); (C.B.); (E.T.); (A.B.); (F.D.C.); (A.E.)
- Department of Radiology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132 Milan, Italy
| | - Vito Cucchiara
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Via Olgettina 60, 20132 Milan, Italy; (P.M.); (S.G.); (A.P.); (V.C.); (G.B.); (C.B.); (E.T.); (A.B.); (F.D.C.); (A.E.)
- Department of Urology, Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132 Milan, Italy
| | - Giorgio Brembilla
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Via Olgettina 60, 20132 Milan, Italy; (P.M.); (S.G.); (A.P.); (V.C.); (G.B.); (C.B.); (E.T.); (A.B.); (F.D.C.); (A.E.)
- Department of Radiology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132 Milan, Italy
| | - Carolina Bezzi
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Via Olgettina 60, 20132 Milan, Italy; (P.M.); (S.G.); (A.P.); (V.C.); (G.B.); (C.B.); (E.T.); (A.B.); (F.D.C.); (A.E.)
| | - Riccardo Rigamonti
- Nuclear Medicine Department, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132 Milan, Italy; (A.M.S.G.); (E.P.); (R.R.); (P.M.); (V.B.); (L.G.); (P.S.)
| | - Patrizia Magnani
- Nuclear Medicine Department, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132 Milan, Italy; (A.M.S.G.); (E.P.); (R.R.); (P.M.); (V.B.); (L.G.); (P.S.)
| | - Elisa Toninelli
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Via Olgettina 60, 20132 Milan, Italy; (P.M.); (S.G.); (A.P.); (V.C.); (G.B.); (C.B.); (E.T.); (A.B.); (F.D.C.); (A.E.)
| | - Valentino Bettinardi
- Nuclear Medicine Department, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132 Milan, Italy; (A.M.S.G.); (E.P.); (R.R.); (P.M.); (V.B.); (L.G.); (P.S.)
| | - Nazareno Suardi
- IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, University of Genoa, Via Benzi 10, 16132 Genoa, Italy;
| | - Luigi Gianolli
- Nuclear Medicine Department, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132 Milan, Italy; (A.M.S.G.); (E.P.); (R.R.); (P.M.); (V.B.); (L.G.); (P.S.)
| | - Paola Scifo
- Nuclear Medicine Department, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132 Milan, Italy; (A.M.S.G.); (E.P.); (R.R.); (P.M.); (V.B.); (L.G.); (P.S.)
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Via Olgettina 60, 20132 Milan, Italy; (P.M.); (S.G.); (A.P.); (V.C.); (G.B.); (C.B.); (E.T.); (A.B.); (F.D.C.); (A.E.)
- Department of Urology, Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132 Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco De Cobelli
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Via Olgettina 60, 20132 Milan, Italy; (P.M.); (S.G.); (A.P.); (V.C.); (G.B.); (C.B.); (E.T.); (A.B.); (F.D.C.); (A.E.)
- Department of Radiology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132 Milan, Italy
| | - Antonio Esposito
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Via Olgettina 60, 20132 Milan, Italy; (P.M.); (S.G.); (A.P.); (V.C.); (G.B.); (C.B.); (E.T.); (A.B.); (F.D.C.); (A.E.)
- Department of Radiology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132 Milan, Italy
| | - Maria Picchio
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Via Olgettina 60, 20132 Milan, Italy; (P.M.); (S.G.); (A.P.); (V.C.); (G.B.); (C.B.); (E.T.); (A.B.); (F.D.C.); (A.E.)
- Nuclear Medicine Department, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132 Milan, Italy; (A.M.S.G.); (E.P.); (R.R.); (P.M.); (V.B.); (L.G.); (P.S.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +39-02-2643-6117
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Mapelli P, Ghezzo S, Samanes Gajate AM, Preza E, Brembilla G, Cucchiara V, Ahmed N, Bezzi C, Presotto L, Bettinardi V, Savi A, Magnani P, Menichini R, Coliva A, Neri I, Di Gaeta E, Gianolli L, Freschi M, Briganti A, De Cobelli F, Scifo P, Picchio M. Preliminary Results of an Ongoing Prospective Clinical Trial on the Use of 68Ga-PSMA and 68Ga-DOTA- RM2 PET/MRI in Staging of High-Risk Prostate Cancer Patients. Diagnostics (Basel) 2021; 11:2068. [PMID: 34829417 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11112068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2021] [Accepted: 11/04/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
The aim of the present study is to investigate the synergic role of 68Ga-PSMA PET/MRI and 68Ga-DOTA-RM2 PET/MRI in prostate cancer (PCa) staging. We present pilot data on twenty-two patients with biopsy-proven PCa that underwent 68Ga-PSMA PET/MRI for staging purposes, with 19/22 also undergoing 68Gaa-DOTA-RM2 PET/MRI. TNM classification based on image findings was performed and quantitative imaging parameters were collected for each scan. Furthermore, twelve patients underwent radical prostatectomy with the availability of histological data that were used as the gold standard to validate intraprostatic findings. A DICE score between regions of interest manually segmented on the primary tumour on 68Ga-PSMA PET, 68Ga-DOTA-RM2 PET and on T2 MRI was computed. All imaging modalities detected the primary PCa in 18/19 patients, with 68Ga-DOTA-RM2 PET not detecting any lesion in 1/19 patients. In the remaining patients, 68Ga-PSMA and MRI were concordant. Seven patients presented seminal vesicles involvement on MRI, with two of these being also detected by 68Ga-PSMA, and 68Ga-DOTA-RM2 PET being negative. Regarding extraprostatic disease, 68Ga-PSMA PET, 68Ga-DOTA-RM2 PET and MRI resulted positive in seven, four and five patients at lymph-nodal level, respectively, and at a bone level in three, zero and one patients, respectively. These preliminary results suggest the potential complementary role of 68Ga-PSMA PET, 68Ga-DOTA-RM2 PET and MRI in PCa characterization during the staging phase.
Collapse
|
8
|
Fassbender TF, Schiller F, Zamboglou C, Drendel V, Kiefer S, Jilg CA, Grosu AL, Mix M. Voxel-based comparison of [ 68Ga]Ga- RM2-PET/CT and [ 68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11-PET/CT with histopathology for diagnosis of primary prostate cancer. EJNMMI Res 2020; 10:62. [PMID: 32533273 PMCID: PMC7292851 DOI: 10.1186/s13550-020-00652-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2020] [Accepted: 05/31/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Focal therapies or focally escalated therapies of primary prostate cancer are becoming more and more important. This increases the need to identify the exact extension of the intraprostatic tumor and possible dominant intraprostatic lesions by imaging techniques. While the prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is already a well-established target for imaging of prostate cancer cells, the gastrin-releasing peptide receptor (GRPR) seems to provide interesting additional information. Histopathology was used to examine the extent to which the single and combined image information of PET scans targeting GRPR and PSMA might lead to better tumor delineation. METHODS Eight patients with histologically proven primary prostate cancer underwent two positron emission tomography with computer tomography scans, [68Ga]Ga-RM2-PET/CT (RM2-PET) and [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11-PET/CT (PSMA-PET), prior to radical prostatectomy. RM2-PET data were correlated voxel-wise to a voxel-based model of the histopathologic tumor volume information. The results were compared to, correlated to, and combined with the correlation of PSMA-PET data analyzed analogously. RESULTS In 4/8 patients, RM2-PET showed a higher signal in histologically proven tumor regions compared to PSMA. There were also tumor regions where PSMA-PET showed a higher signal than GRPR in 4/8 patients. A voxel-wise correlation of RM2-PET against histopathology yielded similar results compared to the correlation of PSMA-PET against histopathology, while PSMA-PET is the slightly better performing imaging technique. The combined information of both tracers yielded the best overall result, although this effect was not statistically significant compared to RM2-PET alone. CONCLUSIONS Qualitative and quantitative findings in this preliminary study with 8 patients indicate that RM2-PET and PSMA-PET partially show not only the same, but also distinct regions of prostate cancer. Patients with pPCa might profit from information given by tracers targeting GRPR and PSMA simultaneously, in terms of a better delineation of the gross tumor volume.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Franz Fassbender
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Florian Schiller
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Constantinos Zamboglou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- Berta-Ottenstein-Programme, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Vanessa Drendel
- Department of Pathology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Selina Kiefer
- Department of Pathology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Cordula A. Jilg
- Department of Urology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Anca-Ligia Grosu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Michael Mix
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Bandara N, Stott Reynolds TJ, Schehr R, Bandari RP, Diebolder PJ, Krieger S, Xu J, Miao Y, Rogers BE, Smith CJ. Matched-pair, 86Y/ 90Y-labeled, bivalent RGD/bombesin antagonist, [RGD-Glu-[DO3A]-6-Ahx- RM2], as a potential theranostic agent for prostate cancer. Nucl Med Biol 2018; 62-63:71-77. [PMID: 29929115 PMCID: PMC6072280 DOI: 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2018.06.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2018] [Revised: 05/14/2018] [Accepted: 06/04/2018] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION In this study, we describe development of a true matched-pair theranostic agent that is able to target the αVβ3 integrin and the gastrin releasing peptide receptor (GRPR). We herein describe methods to metallate and characterize the new conjugate and to validate its biological efficacy by in vitro and in vivo methods. METHODS We have previously described the development of [RGD-Glu-6Ahx-RM2] (where RGD: Arg-Gly-Asp; Glu: glutamic acid; 6-Ahx: 6-amino hexanoic acid; RM2: (D-Phe-Gln-Trp-Ala-Val-Gly-His-Sta-Leu-NH2)) that has been conjugated to a DOTA (1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-1,4,7,10-tetraacetic acid) bifunctional chelating agent (BFCA) to afford [RGD-Glu-[DO3A]-6-Ahx-RM2] peptide. In this study, we have radiolabeled [RGD-Glu-[DO3A]-6-Ahx-RM2] peptide with 86Y or 90Y. Natural-metallated (natY) conjugates were assessed for binding affinity for the αVβ3 integrin or GRPR in human glioblastoma U87-MG and prostate PC-3 cell lines, respectively. The effective stability of the new tracers was also evaluated prior to in vivo evaluation in normal CF-1 mice and SCID mice bearing xenografted tumors. RESULTS Competitive displacement binding assays in PC-3 cells showed high binding affinity for the GRPR (IC50, 5.65 ± 0.00 nM). On the other hand, competitive displacement binding assays in U87-MG cells revealed only moderate binding to the αVβ3 integrin (IC50, 346 ± 5.30 nM). Biodistribution studies in PC-3 tumor-bearing mice [RGD-Glu-[[90Y]Y-DO3A]-6-Ahx-RM2] showed high tumor uptake (8.70 ± 0.35%ID/g at 1 h post-intravenous injection) and retention of tracer (5.28 ± 0.12%ID/g) at 24 h post-intravenous injection. Micro-positron emission tomography (microPET) in PC-3 tumor-bearing mice using [RGD-Glu-[[86Y]Y-DO3A]-6-Ahx-RM2] correlated well with biodistribution investigations over the various time points that were studied. CONCLUSIONS The [RGD-Glu-[[86Y]Y-DO3A]-6-Ahx-RM2] and [RGD-Glu-[[90Y]Y-DO3A]-6-Ahx-RM2] matched-pair conjugates described herein exhibit favorable microPET and pharmacokinetic profiles and merit further investigations for molecular imaging and/or therapeutic evaluation in larger animal models and potentially humans. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PATIENT CARE The theranostic, heterobivalent, agents described herein perform comparably with other mono- and multivalent conjugates we have reported and offer the potential of improved sensitivity for detecting prostate cancer cells that might exhibit differing profiles of receptor expression on tumor cells in human patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nilantha Bandara
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63108, United States
| | - Tamila J Stott Reynolds
- Research Division, Harry S. Truman Memorial Veterans' Hospital, Columbia, MO, 65201, United States; Department of Veterinary Pathobiology, Comparative Medicine Program, University of Missouri College of Veterinary Medicine, Columbia, MO 65211, United States
| | - Rebecca Schehr
- Veterinary Research Scholars Program, University of Missouri College of Veterinary Medicine, Columbia, MO 65211, United States
| | - Rajendra P Bandari
- Department of Radiology, University of Missouri School of Medicine, Columbia, MO 65211, United States
| | - Philipp J Diebolder
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63108, United States
| | - Stephanie Krieger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63108, United States
| | - Jingli Xu
- Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, University of Colorado Denver Aurora, CO 80045, United States
| | - Yubin Miao
- Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, University of Colorado Denver Aurora, CO 80045, United States
| | - Buck E Rogers
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63108, United States.
| | - Charles J Smith
- Research Division, Harry S. Truman Memorial Veterans' Hospital, Columbia, MO, 65201, United States; Department of Radiology, University of Missouri School of Medicine, Columbia, MO 65211, United States; University of Missouri Research Reactor Center, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Minamimoto R, Sonni I, Hancock S, Vasanawala S, Loening A, Gambhir SS, Iagaru A. Prospective Evaluation of 68Ga- RM2 PET/MRI in Patients with Biochemical Recurrence of Prostate Cancer and Negative Findings on Conventional Imaging. J Nucl Med 2017; 59:803-808. [PMID: 29084827 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.117.197624] [Citation(s) in RCA: 59] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2017] [Accepted: 10/06/2017] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
68Ga-labeled DOTA-4-amino-1-carboxymethyl-piperidine-d-Phe-Gln-Trp-Ala-Val-Gly-His-Sta-Leu-NH2 (68Ga-RM2) is a synthetic bombesin receptor antagonist that targets gastrin-releasing peptide receptor (GRPr). GRPr proteins are highly overexpressed in several human tumors, including prostate cancer (PCa). We present data from the use of 68Ga-RM2 in patients with biochemical recurrence (BCR) of PCa and negative findings on conventional imaging. Methods: We enrolled 32 men with BCR of PCa, who were 59-83 y old (mean ± SD, 68.7 ± 6.4 y). Imaging started at 40-69 min (mean, 50.5 ± 6.8 min) after injection of 133.2-151.7 MBq (mean, 140.6 ± 7.4 MBq) of 68Ga-RM2 using a time-of-flight-enabled simultaneous PET/MRI scanner. T1-weighted, T2-weighted, and diffusion-weighted images were acquired. Results: All patients had a rising level of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) (range, 0.3-119.0 ng/mL; mean, 10.1 ± 21.3 ng/mL) and negative findings on conventional imaging (CT or MRI, and a 99mTc-methylene diphosphonate bone scan) before enrollment. The observed 68Ga-RM2 PET detection rate was 71.8%. 68Ga-RM2 PET identified recurrent PCa in 23 of the 32 participants, whereas the simultaneous MRI scan identified findings compatible with recurrent PCa in 11 of the 32 patients. PSA velocity was 0.32 ± 0.59 ng/mL/y (range, 0.04-1.9 ng/mL/y) in patients with negative PET findings and 2.51 ± 2.16 ng/mL/y (range, 0.13-8.68 ng/mL/y) in patients with positive PET findings (P = 0.006). Conclusion:68Ga-RM2 PET can be used for assessment of GRPr expression in patients with BCR of PCa. High uptake in multiple areas compatible with cancer lesions suggests that 68Ga-RM2 is a promising PET radiopharmaceutical for localization of disease in patients with BCR of PCa and negative findings on conventional imaging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryogo Minamimoto
- Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Ida Sonni
- Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Steven Hancock
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Shreyas Vasanawala
- Radiological Sciences Laboratory, Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Andreas Loening
- Radiological Sciences Laboratory, Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Sanjiv S Gambhir
- Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, California.,Department of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California; and.,Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Andrei Iagaru
- Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Stott Reynolds TJ, Schehr R, Liu D, Xu J, Miao Y, Hoffman TJ, Rold TL, Lewis MR, Smith CJ. Characterization and evaluation of DOTA-conjugated Bombesin/RGD-antagonists for prostate cancer tumor imaging and therapy. Nucl Med Biol 2014; 42:99-108. [PMID: 25459113 DOI: 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2014.10.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2014] [Revised: 09/30/2014] [Accepted: 10/06/2014] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Here we present the metallation, characterization, in vivo and in vitro evaluations of dual-targeting, peptide-based radiopharmaceuticals with utility for imaging and potentially treating prostate tumors by virtue of their ability to target the αVβ3 integrin or the gastrin releasing peptide receptor (GRPr). METHODS [RGD-Glu-6Ahx-RM2] (RGD: Arg-Gly-Asp; Glu: glutamic acid; 6-Ahx: 6-amino hexanoic acid; RM2: (D-Phe-Gln-Trp-Ala-Val-Gly-His-Sta-Leu-NH2)) was conjugated to a DOTA (1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-1,4,7,10-tetraacetic acid) bifunctional chelator (BFCA) purified via reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC), characterized by electrospray ionization-mass spectrometry (ESI-MS), and radiolabeled with (111)In or (177)Lu. Natural-metallated compounds were assessed for binding affinity for the αVβ3 integrin or GRPr in human glioblastoma U87-MG and prostate PC-3 cell lines and stability prior to in vivo evaluation in normal CF-1 mice and SCID mice xenografted with PC-3 cells. RESULTS Competitive displacement binding assays with PC-3 and U87-MG cells revealed high to moderate binding affinity for the GRPr or the αVβ3 integrin (IC50 range of 5.39±1.37 nM to 9.26±0.00 nM in PC-3 cells, and a range of 255±47 nM to 321±85 nM in U87-MG cells). Biodistribution studies indicated high tumor uptake in PC-3 tumor-bearing mice (average of 7.40±0.53% ID/g at 1h post-intravenous injection) and prolonged retention of tracer (mean of 4.41±0.91% ID/g at 24h post-intravenous injection). Blocking assays corroborated the specificity of radioconjugates for each target. Micro-single photon emission computed tomography (microSPECT) confirmed favorable radiouptake profiles in xenografted mice at 20h post-injection. CONCLUSIONS [RGD-Glu-[(111)In-DO3A]-6-Ahx-RM2] and [RGD-Glu-[(177)Lu- DO3A]-6-Ahx-RM2] show favorable pharmacokinetic and radiouptake profiles, meriting continued evaluation for molecular imaging in murine U87-MG/PC-3 xenograft models and radiotherapy studies with (177)Lu and (90)Y conjugates. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PATIENT CARE These heterovalent, peptide-targeting ligands perform comparably with many mono- and multivalent conjugates with the potential benefit of increased sensitivity for detecting cancer cells exhibiting differential expression of target receptors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tamila J Stott Reynolds
- Research Division, Harry S. Truman Memorial Veterans' Hospital, Columbia, Missouri, United States, 65201; Department of Veterinary Pathobiology, Comparative Medicine Program, University of Missouri College of Veterinary Medicine, Columbia, MO, United States, 65211.
| | - Rebecca Schehr
- Veterinary Research Scholars Program, University of Missouri College of Veterinary Medicine, Columbia, MO, United States, 65211
| | - Dijie Liu
- Research Division, Harry S. Truman Memorial Veterans' Hospital, Columbia, Missouri, United States, 65201; Department of Radiology, University of Missouri School of Medicine, Columbia, MO, United States, 65211
| | - Jingli Xu
- College of Pharmacy, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, United States, 87131
| | - Yubin Miao
- College of Pharmacy, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, United States, 87131; Cancer Research and Treatment Center, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, United States, 87131; Department of Dermatology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, United States, 87131
| | - Timothy J Hoffman
- Research Division, Harry S. Truman Memorial Veterans' Hospital, Columbia, Missouri, United States, 65201; Department of Internal Medicine, University of Missouri School of Medicine, Columbia, MO, United States, 65211; Department of Chemistry, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, United States, 65211
| | - Tammy L Rold
- Research Division, Harry S. Truman Memorial Veterans' Hospital, Columbia, Missouri, United States, 65201; Department of Internal Medicine, University of Missouri School of Medicine, Columbia, MO, United States, 65211
| | - Michael R Lewis
- Research Division, Harry S. Truman Memorial Veterans' Hospital, Columbia, Missouri, United States, 65201; Department of Radiology, University of Missouri School of Medicine, Columbia, MO, United States, 65211
| | - Charles J Smith
- Research Division, Harry S. Truman Memorial Veterans' Hospital, Columbia, Missouri, United States, 65201; Department of Radiology, University of Missouri School of Medicine, Columbia, MO, United States, 65211; University of Missouri Research Reactor Center, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, United States, 65211.
| |
Collapse
|