1
|
Estroff JM, Devlin J, Hoteit L, Hassoune A, Neal MD, Brown JB, Lu L, Kotch S, Hazelton JP, Christian AB, Yeates EO, Nahmias J, Jacobson LE, Williams J, Schuster KM, O'Connor R, Semon GR, Straughn AD, Cullinane D, Egodage T, Kincaid M, Rollins A, Amdur R, Sarani B. 4-factor prothrombin complex concentrate is not inferior to andexanet alfa for the reversal or oral factor Xa inhibitors: An Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma multicenter study. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2024:01586154-990000000-00713. [PMID: 38685190 DOI: 10.1097/ta.0000000000004345] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/02/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Andexanet Alfa (AA) is the only FDA approved reversal agent for apixaban and rivaroxaban (DOAC). There are no studies comparing its efficacy with 4-Factor Prothrombin Complex Concentrate (PCC). This study aimed to compare PCC to AA for DOAC reversal, hypothesizing non-inferiority of PCC. METHODS We performed a retrospective, non-inferiority multicenter study of adult patients admitted from July 1, 2018 to December 31, 2019 who had taken a DOAC within 12 hours of injury, were transfused red blood cells (RBCs) or had traumatic brain injury, and received AA or PCC. Primary outcome was PRBC unit transfusion. Secondary outcome with ICU length of stay. MICE imputation was used to account for missing data and zero-inflated poisson regression was used to account for an excess of zero units of RBC transfused. 2 Units difference in RBC transfusion was selected as non-inferior. RESULTS Results: From 263 patients at 10 centers, 77 (29%) received PCC and 186 (71%) AA. Patients had similar transfusion rates across reversal treatment groups (23.7% AA vs 19.5% PCC) with median transfusion in both groups of 0 RBC. According to the Poisson component, PCC increases the amount of RBC transfusion by 1.02 times (95% CI: 0.79-1.33) compared to AA after adjusting for other covariates. The averaged amount of RBC transfusion (non-zero group) is 6.13. Multiplying this number by the estimated rate ratio, PCC is estimated to have an increase RBC transfusion by 0.123 (95% CI: 0.53-2.02) units compared to AA. CONCLUSION PCC appears non-inferior to AA for reversal of DOACs for RBC transfusion in traumatically injured patients. Additional prospective, randomized trials are necessary to compare PCC and AA for the treatment of hemorrhage in injured patients on DOACs. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic/Care Management, Level III.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jordan M Estroff
- Center for Trauma and Critical Care, Department of Surgery, George Washington University, Washington, DC
| | - Joseph Devlin
- Center for Trauma and Critical Care, Department of Surgery, George Washington University, Washington, DC
| | - Lara Hoteit
- Trauma and Transfusion Medicine Research Center, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Adnan Hassoune
- Trauma and Transfusion Medicine Research Center, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Matthew D Neal
- Trauma and Transfusion Medicine Research Center, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Joshua B Brown
- Trauma and Transfusion Medicine Research Center, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Liling Lu
- Trauma and Transfusion Medicine Research Center, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Shannon Kotch
- Department of Surgery, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center
| | - Joshua P Hazelton
- Department of Surgery, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center
| | | | - Eric O Yeates
- Department of Surgery, University of California, Irvine, Orange, CA
| | - Jeffry Nahmias
- Department of Surgery, University of California, Irvine, Orange, CA
| | | | | | | | - Rick O'Connor
- Yale University/Yale New Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT
| | - Gregory R Semon
- Department of Surgery, Wright State University Boonshoft School of Medicine, Dayton, OH
| | | | | | - Tanya Egodage
- Cooper University, Camden, NJ Grant Medical Center, Columbus, OH
| | | | | | - Richard Amdur
- Center for Trauma and Critical Care, Department of Surgery, George Washington University, Washington, DC
| | - Babak Sarani
- Center for Trauma and Critical Care, Department of Surgery, George Washington University, Washington, DC
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Anandalwar SP, O'Meara L, Vesselinov R, Zhang A, Baum JN, Cooper A, Decker C, Schroeppel T, Cai J, Cullinane D, Catalano RD, Bugaev N, LeClair M, Feather C, McBride K, Sams V, Leung PS, Olafson S, Callahan DS, Posluszny J, Moradian S, Estroff J, Hochman B, Coleman N, Goldenberg-Sandau A, Nahmias J, Rosenbaum K, Pasley J, Boll L, Hustad L, Reynolds J, Truitt M, Ghneim M. Warfarin, not direct oral anticoagulants nor antiplatelet therapy, is associated with increased bleeding risk in emergency general surgery patients: implications in this new era of novel anticoagulants: An EAST Multicenter study. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2024:01586154-990000000-00691. [PMID: 38595274 DOI: 10.1097/ta.0000000000004278] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/11/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION To assess perioperative bleeding complications & in-hospital mortality in patients requiring emergency general surgery (EGS) presenting with a history of antiplatelet (AP) vs. direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) vs warfarin use. METHODS Prospective observational study across 21 centers between 2019-2022. Inclusion criteria were age ≥ 18 years, & DOAC, warfarin or AP use within 24 hours of an EGSP. Outcomes included perioperative bleeding and in-hospital mortality. The study was conducted using ANOVA, Chi-square, and multivariable regression models. RESULTS Of the 413 patients, 221 (53.5%) reported AP use, 152 (36.8%) DOAC use, & 40 (9.7%) warfarin use. Most common indications for surgery were obstruction (23% (AP), 45% (DOAC), 28% (warfarin)), intestinal ischemia (13%, 17%, 23%), & diverticulitis/peptic ulcers (7%, 7%, 15%). Compared to DOAC use, warfarin use was associated with significantly higher perioperative bleeding complication (OR 4.4 [2.0, 9.9]). There was no significant difference in perioperative bleeding complication between DOAC & AP use (OR 0.7 [0.4, 1.1]). Compared to DOAC use, there was no significant difference in mortality between warfarin use (0.7 [0.2, 2.5]) or AP use (OR 0.5 [0.2, 1.2]). After adjusting for confounders, warfarin use (OR 6.3 [2.8, 13.9]), medical history and operative indication were associated with an increase in perioperative bleeding complications. However, warfarin was not independently associated with risk of mortality (OR 1.3 [0.39, 4.7]), whereas intraoperative vasopressor use (OR 4.7 [1.7, 12.8)), medical history & postoperative bleeding (OR 5.5 [2.4, 12.8]) were. CONCLUSIONS Despite ongoing concerns about the increase in DOAC use & lack of readily available reversal agents, this study suggests that warfarin, rather than DOACs, is associated with higher perioperative bleeding complications. However, that risk does not result in an increase in mortality, suggesting that perioperative decisions should be dictated by patient disease & comorbidities rather than type of antiplatelet or anticoagulant use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seema P Anandalwar
- Department of Trauma Surgery, University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Lindsay O'Meara
- Department of Trauma Surgery, University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Roumen Vesselinov
- Department of Epidemiology & Public Health, University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore Maryland
| | - Ashling Zhang
- Department of Trauma Surgery, University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, Maryland
| | | | - Amanda Cooper
- Department of Surgery, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania
| | - Cassandra Decker
- Department of Surgery, UCHealth Memorial Hospital, Colorado Springs
| | | | - Jenny Cai
- Department of Surgery, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey
| | | | | | - Nikolay Bugaev
- Tufts Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Madison LeClair
- Tufts Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | | | - Valerie Sams
- Brooke Army Medical Center, Fort Sam Houston, Texas
| | - Pak Shan Leung
- Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Samantha Olafson
- Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Devon S Callahan
- Department of Surgery, Allina Health/Abbott Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Joseph Posluszny
- Separtment of Surgery, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois
| | - Simon Moradian
- Separtment of Surgery, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois
| | - Jordan Estroff
- Department of Surgery, George Washington University, Washington D.C
| | - Beth Hochman
- Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Natasha Coleman
- Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York
| | | | - Jeffry Nahmias
- University of California Irvine Medical Center, Irvine, California
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Mira Ghneim
- Department of Trauma Surgery, University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bhogadi SK, Alizai Q, Colosimo C, Spencer AL, Stewart C, Nelson A, Ditillo M, Castanon L, Magnotti LJ, Joseph B, Dultz L, Black G, Campbell M, Berndtson AE, Costantini T, Kerwin A, Skarupa D, Burruss S, Delgado L, Gomez M, Mederos DR, Winfield R, Cullinane D, Hosseinpour H. Not all traumatic brain injury patients on preinjury anticoagulation are the same. Am J Surg 2023; 226:785-789. [PMID: 37301645 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2023.05.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2023] [Revised: 05/22/2023] [Accepted: 05/25/2023] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prognostic significance of different anticoagulants in TBI patients remains unanswered. We aimed to compare effects of different anticoagulants on outcomes of TBI patients. METHODS A secondary analysis of AAST BIG MIT. Blunt TBI patients ≥50 years using anticoagulants presenting ICH were identified. Outcomes were progression of ICH and need for neurosurgical intervention (NSI). RESULTS 393 patients were identified. Mean age was 74 and most common anticoagulant was aspirin (30%), followed by Plavix (28%), and coumadin (20%). 20% had progression of ICH and 10% underwent NSI. On multivariate regression for ICH progression, warfarin, SDH, IPH, SAH, alcohol intoxication and neurologic exam deterioration were associated with increased odds. Warfarin, abnormal neurologic exam on presentation, and SDH were independent predictors of NSI. CONCLUSIONS Our findings reflect a dynamic interaction between type of anticoagulants, bleeding pattern & outcomes. Future modifications of BIG may need to take the type of anticoagulant into consideration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sai Krishna Bhogadi
- Division of Trauma, Critical Care, Emergency Surgery, and Burns, Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
| | - Qaidar Alizai
- Division of Trauma, Critical Care, Emergency Surgery, and Burns, Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
| | - Christina Colosimo
- Division of Trauma, Critical Care, Emergency Surgery, and Burns, Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
| | - Audrey L Spencer
- Division of Trauma, Critical Care, Emergency Surgery, and Burns, Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
| | - Collin Stewart
- Division of Trauma, Critical Care, Emergency Surgery, and Burns, Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
| | - Adam Nelson
- Division of Trauma, Critical Care, Emergency Surgery, and Burns, Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
| | - Michael Ditillo
- Division of Trauma, Critical Care, Emergency Surgery, and Burns, Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
| | - Lourdes Castanon
- Division of Trauma, Critical Care, Emergency Surgery, and Burns, Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
| | - Louis J Magnotti
- Division of Trauma, Critical Care, Emergency Surgery, and Burns, Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
| | - Bellal Joseph
- Division of Trauma, Critical Care, Emergency Surgery, and Burns, Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
| | - Linda Dultz
- Division of Trauma, Critical Care, Emergency Surgery, and Burns, Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | - George Black
- Division of Trauma, Critical Care, Emergency Surgery, and Burns, Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | - Marc Campbell
- Division of Trauma, Critical Care, Emergency Surgery, and Burns, Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | - Allison E Berndtson
- Division of Trauma, Critical Care, Emergency Surgery, and Burns, Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | - Todd Costantini
- Division of Trauma, Critical Care, Emergency Surgery, and Burns, Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | - Andrew Kerwin
- Division of Trauma, Critical Care, Emergency Surgery, and Burns, Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | - David Skarupa
- Division of Trauma, Critical Care, Emergency Surgery, and Burns, Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | - Sigrid Burruss
- Division of Trauma, Critical Care, Emergency Surgery, and Burns, Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | - Lauren Delgado
- Division of Trauma, Critical Care, Emergency Surgery, and Burns, Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | - Mario Gomez
- Division of Trauma, Critical Care, Emergency Surgery, and Burns, Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | - Dalier R Mederos
- Division of Trauma, Critical Care, Emergency Surgery, and Burns, Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | - Robert Winfield
- Division of Trauma, Critical Care, Emergency Surgery, and Burns, Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | - Daniel Cullinane
- Division of Trauma, Critical Care, Emergency Surgery, and Burns, Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | - Hamidreza Hosseinpour
- Division of Trauma, Critical Care, Emergency Surgery, and Burns, Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Diaz JJ, Barnes S, O'Meara L, Sawyer R, May A, Cullinane D, Schroeppel T, Chipman A, Kufera J, Vesselinov R, Zielinski M. Acute Care Surgery and Surgical Rescue: Expanding the Definition. J Am Coll Surg 2023; 236:827-835. [PMID: 36633328 DOI: 10.1097/xcs.0000000000000558] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Surgical rescue (SR) is the recovery of patients with surgical complications. Patients transferred (TP) for surgical diagnoses to higher-level care or inpatients (IP) admitted to nonsurgical services may develop intra-abdominal infection (IAI) and require emergency surgery (ES). The aims were to characterize the SR population by the site of ES consultation, open abdomen (OA), and risk of mortality. STUDY DESIGN This was an international, multi-institutional prospective observational study of patients requiring ES for IAI. Laparotomy before the transfer was an exclusion criterion. Patients were divided into groups: clinic/ED (C/ED), IP, or TP. Data collected included demographics, the severity of illness (SOI), procedures, OA, and number of laparotomies. The primary outcome was mortality. Multivariable logistic regression models were constructed. RESULTS There were 752 study patients (C/ED 63.8% vs TP 23.4% and IP 12.8%), with a mean age of 59 years and 43.6% women. IP had worse SOI scores (Charlson Comorbidity Index, American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification System, and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment). The most common procedures were small and large bowel (77.3%). IP and TP had similar rates of OA (IP 52.1% and TP 52.3 %) vs C/ED (37.7%, p < 0.001), and IP had more relaparotomies (3 or 4). The unadjusted mortality rate was highest in IP (n = 24, 25.0%) vs TP (n = 29, 16.5%) and C/ED (n = 68, 14.2%, p = 0.03). Adjusting for age and SOI, only SOI had an impact on the risk of mortality (area under the curve 86%). CONCLUSIONS IP had the highest unadjusted mortality after ES for IAI and was followed by the TP; SOI drove the risk of mortality. SR must be extended to IP for timely recognition of the IAI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jose J Diaz
- From the University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD (Diaz, Chipman, Kufera, Vesselinov)
| | - Stephen Barnes
- Department of Surgery, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO (Barnes)
| | - Lindsay O'Meara
- University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD (O'Meara)
| | - Robert Sawyer
- Western Michigan University School of Medicine: Western Michigan University Homer Stryker MD School of Medicine, Kalamazoo, MI (Sawyer)
| | - Addison May
- Atrium Health/Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, NC (May)
| | | | - Thomas Schroeppel
- University of Colorado-Health Memorial Hospital Central, Colorado Springs, CO (Schroeppel)
| | - Amanda Chipman
- From the University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD (Diaz, Chipman, Kufera, Vesselinov)
| | - Joseph Kufera
- From the University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD (Diaz, Chipman, Kufera, Vesselinov)
| | - Roumen Vesselinov
- From the University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD (Diaz, Chipman, Kufera, Vesselinov)
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Zhang G, Shurtleff E, Falank C, Cullinane D, Carter D, Sheppard F. Thoracoscopic-assisted rib plating (TARP): initial single-center case series, including TARP in the super elderly, technical lessons learned, and proposed expanded indications. Trauma Surg Acute Care Open 2022; 7:e000943. [PMID: 36111139 PMCID: PMC9438051 DOI: 10.1136/tsaco-2022-000943] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2022] [Accepted: 07/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives The application of surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRF) remains inconsistent due to evolving indications and perceived associated morbidity. By implementing thoracoscopic-assisted rib plating (TARP), a minimally invasive SSRF approach, we expanded our SSRF application to patients who otherwise might not be offered fixation. This report presents our initial experience, including fixation in super elderly (aged ≥85 years), and technical lessons learned. Methods This was a retrospective cohort study at a level 1 trauma center of admitted patients who underwent TARP between August 2019 and October 2020. Patient demographics, injury characteristics, surgical indications and outcomes are represented as mean±SD, median or percentage. Results A total of 2134 patients with rib fractures were admitted. In this group, 39 SSRF procedures were performed, of which 54% (n=21) were TARP. Average age was 68.5±16 years. Patients had a median of 5 fractured ribs, with an average of 1 rib that was bicortically displaced, and 19% presented with ‘clicking’ on inspiration. Patient outcomes were a mean hospital length of stay (LOS) of 11±3.7 days, mean postoperative LOS of 8 days, and mean intensive care unit LOS of 6.6±2.9 days. Five patients were ≥85 years old with a mean age of 90.8±4.7 years. They presented with an average of 4 rib fractures, of which an average of 2.4 ribs were plated. The procedure was well tolerated in this age group with a hospital LOS of 9.4±2 days, and all five patients were discharged to a rehab facility with no in-hospital mortalities. Conclusion Our experience incorporating TARP at our institution demonstrated feasibility of the technique and application across a broad range of patients. This approach and its application warrants further evaluation and potentially expands the application of SSRF. .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gary Zhang
- Department of Surgery, Maine Medical Center, Portland, Maine, USA
| | - Eric Shurtleff
- Department of Surgery, Maine Medical Center, Portland, Maine, USA
| | - Carolyne Falank
- Department of Surgery, Maine Medical Center, Portland, Maine, USA
| | - Daniel Cullinane
- Department of Surgery, Maine Medical Center, Portland, Maine, USA
| | - Damien Carter
- Department of Surgery, Maine Medical Center, Portland, Maine, USA
| | - Forest Sheppard
- Department of Surgery, Maine Medical Center, Portland, Maine, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Joseph B, Obaid O, Dultz L, Black G, Campbell M, Berndtson AE, Costantini T, Kerwin A, Skarupa D, Burruss S, Delgado L, Gomez M, Mederos DR, Winfield R, Cullinane D. Validating the Brain Injury Guidelines: Results of an American Association for the Surgery of Trauma prospective multi-institutional trial. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2022; 93:157-165. [PMID: 35343931 DOI: 10.1097/ta.0000000000003554] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Brain Injury Guidelines (BIG) was developed to effectively use health care resources including repeat head computed tomography (RHCT) scan and neurosurgical consultation in traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients. The aim of this study was to prospectively validate BIG at a multi-institutional level. METHODS This is a prospective, observational, multi-institutional trial across nine Levels I and II trauma centers. Adult (16 years or older) blunt TBI patients with a positive initial head computed tomography (CT) scan were identified and categorized into BIG 1, 2, and 3 based on their neurologic examination, alcohol intoxication, antiplatelet/anticoagulant use, and head CT scan findings. The primary outcome was neurosurgical intervention. The secondary outcomes were neurologic worsening, RHCT progression, postdischarge emergency department visit, and 30-day readmission. RESULTS A total of 2,432 patients met the inclusion criteria, of which 2,033 had no missing information and were categorized into BIG 1 (301 [14.8%]), BIG 2 (295 [14.5%]), and BIG 3 (1,437 [70.7%]). In BIG 1, no patient worsened clinically, 4 of 301 patients (1.3%) had progression on RHCT with no change in management, and none required neurosurgical intervention. In BIG 2, 2 of 295 patients (0.7%) worsened clinically, and 21 of 295 patients (7.1%) had progression on RHCT. Overall, 7 of 295 patients (2.4%) would have required upgrade from BIG 2 to 3 because of neurologic examination worsening or progression on RHCT, but no patient required neurosurgical intervention. There were no TBI-related postdischarge emergency department visits or 30-day readmissions in BIG 1 and 2 patients. All patients who required neurosurgical intervention were BIG 3 (280 of 1,437 patients [19.5%]). Agreement between assigned and final BIG categories was excellent ( κ = 99%). In this cohort, implementing BIG would have decreased CT scan utilization and neurosurgical consultation by 29% overall, with a 100% reduction in BIG 1 patients and a 98% reduction in BIG 2 patients. CONCLUSION Brain Injury Guidelines is safe and defines the management of TBI patients by trauma and acute care surgeons without the routine need for RHCT and neurosurgical consultation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic/Care Management; Level III.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bellal Joseph
- From the Division of Trauma, Critical Care, Burns, and Emergency Surgery, Department of Surgery (B.J., O.O., M.C., T.A., A.N.), College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona; Division of General and Acute Care Surgery, Department of Surgery (L.D., G.B., S.K.), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas; Division of Trauma and Critical Care Surgery, Department of Surgery (M.C.), Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee; Division of Trauma, Critical Care, Burns, and Acute Care Surgery, Department of Surgery (A.E.B., T.C.), University of California San Diego Health, San Diego, California; Trauma and Surgical Critical Care Division, Department of Surgery (A.K.), The University of Tennessee Health Science Centerm Memphis, Tennessee; Division of Acute Care Surgery, Department of Surgery (D.S.), College of Medicine, University of Florida, Jacksonville, Florida; Division of Acute Care Surgery and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery (S.B., L.D., X.L.-O.), Loma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda, California; Department of Surgery (M.G., D.R.M.), Broward Health Medical Center, Fort Lauderdale, Florida; Trauma/Critical Care and Acute Care Surgery Division, Department of Surgery (R.W.), School of Medicine, University of Kansas, Kansas City, Kansas; and Department of Surgery (D.C.), Marshfield Clinic Health System, Marshfield, Wisconsin
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
El Hechi M, Kongkaewpaisan N, Naar L, Aicher B, Diaz J, O'Meara L, Decker C, Rodriquez J, Schroeppel T, Rattan R, Vasileiou G, Yeh DD, Simonoski U, Turay D, Cullinane D, Emmert C, McCrum M, Wall N, Badach J, Goldenberg-Sandau A, Carmichael H, Velopulos C, Choron R, Sakran J, Bekdache K, Black G, Shoultz T, Chadnick Z, Sim V, Madbak F, Steadman D, Camazine M, Zielinski M, Hardman C, Walusimbi M, Kim M, Rodier S, Papadopoulos V, Tsoulfas G, Perez J, Kaafarani HMA. The Emergency Surgery Score accurately predicts the need for postdischarge respiratory and renal support after emergent laparotomies: A prospective EAST multicenter study. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2021; 90:557-564. [PMID: 33507026 DOI: 10.1097/ta.0000000000003016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Emergency Surgery Score (ESS) was recently validated as an accurate mortality risk calculator for emergency general surgery. We sought to prospectively evaluate whether ESS can predict the need for respiratory and/or renal support (RRS) at discharge after emergent laparotomies (EL). METHODS This is a post hoc analysis of a 19-center prospective observational study. Between April 2018 and June 2019, all adult patients undergoing EL were enrolled. Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative variables were systematically collected. In this analysis, patients were excluded if they died during the index hospitalization, were discharged to hospice, or transferred to other hospitals. A composite variable, the need for RRS, was defined as the need for one or more of the following at hospital discharge: tracheostomy, ventilator dependence, or dialysis. Emergency Surgery Score was calculated for all patients, and the correlation between ESS and RRS was examined using the c-statistics method. RESULTS From a total of 1,649 patients, 1,347 were included. Median age was 60 years, 49.4% were men, and 70.9% were White. The most common diagnoses were hollow viscus organ perforation (28.1%) and small bowel obstruction (24.5%); 87 patients (6.5%) had a need for RRS (4.7% tracheostomy, 2.7% dialysis, and 1.3% ventilator dependence). Emergency Surgery Score predicted the need for RRS in a stepwise fashion; for example, 0.7%, 26.2%, and 85.7% of patients required RRS at an ESS of 2, 12, and 16, respectively. The c-statistics for the need for RRS, the need for tracheostomy, ventilator dependence, or dialysis at discharge were 0.84, 0.82, 0.79, and 0.88, respectively. CONCLUSION Emergency Surgery Score accurately predicts the need for RRS at discharge in EL patients and could be used for preoperative patient counseling and for quality of care benchmarking. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Prognostic and epidemiological, level III.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Majed El Hechi
- From the Division of Trauma, Emergency Surgery & Surgical Critical Care (M.E.H., N.K., L.N., H.M.A.K.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Division of Acute Care and Ambulatory Surgery (N.K.), Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand; R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center (B.A., J.D., L.O.), University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, Maryland; Department of Surgery, UCHealth Memorial Hospital Central Trauma Center (C.D., J.R., T.S.), Colorado Springs, Colorado; The Dewitt Daughtry Family Department of Surgery Ryder Trauma Center/Jackson Memorial Hospital (R.R., G.V., D.D.Y.), Miami, Florida; Department of Surgery, Loma Linda University Medical Center (U.S., D.T.), Department of Surgery, Loma Linda, California; Marshfield Clinic (D.C., C.E.), Marshfield, Wisconsin; University of Utah (M.C., N.W.), Salt Lake City, Utah; Department of Surgery, Cooper University Hospital (J.B., A.G.-S.), Camden, New Jersey; Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus (H.C., C.V.), Aurora, Colorado; Division of Acute Care Surgery, Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine (R.C., J.S.), Baltimore, Maryland; Department of Surgery, Eastern Maine Medical Center (K.B.), Bangor, Maine; Department of Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center and Parkland Hospital (G.B., T.S.), Dallas, Texas; Department of Surgery, Staten Island University Hospital, Northwell Health (Z.C., V.S.), Staten Island, New York; Department of Surgery, University of Florida College of Medicine-Jacksonville (F.M., D.S.), Jacksonville, Florida; Mayo Clinic (M.C., M.Z.), Rochester, Minnesota; Miami Valley Hospital (C.H., M.W.), Dayton, Ohio; New York University School of Medicine (M.K., S.R.), New York, New York; Department of Surgery, Papageorgiou General Hospital/Aristotle University School of Medicine (V.P., G.T.), Greece; and Department of Surgery, Hackensack University Medical Center (J.P.), Hackensack, New Jersey
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
El Hechi M, Kongkaewpaisan N, El Moheb M, Aicher B, Diaz J, OʼMeara L, Decker C, Rodriquez J, Schroeppel T, Rattan R, Vasileiou G, Yeh DD, Simonosk U, Turay D, Cullinane D, Emmert C, McCrum M, Wall N, Badach J, Goldenberg-Sanda A, Carmichael H, Velopulos C, Choron R, Sakran J, Bekdache K, Black G, Shoultz T, Chadnick Z, Sim V, Madbak F, Steadman D, Camazine M, Zielinski M, Hardman C, Walusimbi M, Kim M, Rodier S, Papadopoulos V, Tsoulfas G, Perez J, Kaafarani H. The emergency surgery score (ESS) and outcomes in elderly patients undergoing emergency laparotomy: A post-hoc analysis of an EAST multicenter study. Am J Surg 2020; 221:1069-1075. [PMID: 32917366 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2020.08.039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2020] [Revised: 07/21/2020] [Accepted: 08/28/2020] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION We sought to evaluate whether the Emergency Surgery Score (ESS) can accurately predict outcomes in elderly patients undergoing emergent laparotomy (EL). METHODS This is a post-hoc analysis of an EAST multicenter study. Between April 2018 and June 2019, all adult patients undergoing EL in 19 participating hospitals were prospectively enrolled, and ESS was calculated for each patient. Using the c-statistic, the correlation between ESS and mortality, morbidity, and need for ICU admission was assessed in three patient age cohorts (65-74, 75-84, ≥85 years old). RESULTS 715 patients were included, of which 52% were 65-74, 34% were 75-84, and 14% were ≥85 years old; 51% were female, and 77% were white. ESS strongly correlated with postoperative mortality (c-statistic:0.81). Mortality gradually increased from 0% to 20%-60% at ESS of 2, 10 and 16 points, respectively. ESS predicted mortality, morbidity, and need for ICU best in patients 65-74 years old (c-statistic:0.81, 0.75, 0.83 respectively), but its performance significantly decreased in patients ≥85 years (c-statistic:0.72, 0.64, 0.67 respectively). CONCLUSION ESS is an accurate predictor of outcome in the elderly EL patient 65-85 years old, but its performance decreases for patients ≥85. Consideration should be given to modify ESS to better predict outcomes in the very elderly patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Majed El Hechi
- Division of Trauma, Emergency Surgery & Surgical Critical Care, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Napaporn Kongkaewpaisan
- Division of Trauma, Emergency Surgery & Surgical Critical Care, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Division of Acute Care and Ambulatory Surgery, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Mohamad El Moheb
- Division of Trauma, Emergency Surgery & Surgical Critical Care, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Brittany Aicher
- R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Jose Diaz
- R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Lindsay OʼMeara
- R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Cassandra Decker
- UCHealth Memorial Hospital Central Trauma Center, Colorado Springs, CO, USA
| | - Jennifer Rodriquez
- UCHealth Memorial Hospital Central Trauma Center, Colorado Springs, CO, USA
| | - Thomas Schroeppel
- UCHealth Memorial Hospital Central Trauma Center, Colorado Springs, CO, USA
| | - Rishi Rattan
- The DeWitt Daughtry Family Department of Surgery Ryder Trauma Center/ Jackson Memorial Hospital, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Georgia Vasileiou
- The DeWitt Daughtry Family Department of Surgery Ryder Trauma Center/ Jackson Memorial Hospital, Miami, FL, USA
| | - D Dante Yeh
- The DeWitt Daughtry Family Department of Surgery Ryder Trauma Center/ Jackson Memorial Hospital, Miami, FL, USA
| | | | - David Turay
- Loma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda, CA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Rachel Choron
- The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Joseph Sakran
- The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | | - George Black
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center and Parkland Hospital, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Thomas Shoultz
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center and Parkland Hospital, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Zachary Chadnick
- Staten Island University Hospital, Northwell Health, Staten Island, NY, USA
| | - Vasiliy Sim
- Staten Island University Hospital, Northwell Health, Staten Island, NY, USA
| | - Firas Madbak
- University of Florida College of Medicine-Jacksonville, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Daniel Steadman
- University of Florida College of Medicine-Jacksonville, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Mirhee Kim
- New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Simon Rodier
- New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Vasileios Papadopoulos
- Papageorgiou General Hospital/Aristotle University School of Medicine, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Georgios Tsoulfas
- Papageorgiou General Hospital/Aristotle University School of Medicine, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Javier Perez
- Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, NJ, USA
| | - Haytham Kaafarani
- Division of Trauma, Emergency Surgery & Surgical Critical Care, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Rogers FB, Rozycki GS, Osler TM, Shackford SR, Jalbert J, Kirton O, Scalea T, Morris J, Ross S, Cipolle M, Fildes J, Cogbill T, Bergstein J, Clark D, Frankel H, Bell R, Gens D, Cullinane D, Kauder D, Bynoe RP. A multi-institutional study of factors associated with fetal death in injured pregnant patients. Arch Surg 1999; 134:1274-7. [PMID: 10555646 DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.134.11.1274] [Citation(s) in RCA: 74] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
HYPOTHESIS Factors associated with fetal death in injured pregnant patients are related to increasing injury severity and abnormal maternal physiologic profile. DESIGN A multi-institutional retrospective study of 13 level I and level II trauma centers from 1992 to 1996. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE Fetal survival. RESULTS Of 27,715 female admissions, there were 372 injured pregnant patients (1.3%); 84% had blunt injuries and 16% had penetrating injuries. There were 14 maternal deaths (3.8%) and 35 fetal deaths (9.4%). The population suffering fetal death had higher injury severity scores (P<.001), lower Glascow Coma Scale scores (P<.001), and lower admitting maternal pH (P = .002). Most women who lost their fetus arrived in shock (P = .005) or had a fetal heart rate of less than 110 beats/min at some time during their hospitalization (P<.001). An Injury Severity Score greater than 25 was associated with a 50% incidence of fetal death. Placental abruption was the most frequent complication, occurring in 3.5% of patients and associated with 54% mortality. Cardiotrophic monitoring to detect potentially threatening fetal heart rates was performed on only 61% of pregnant women in their third trimester. Of these patients, 7 had abnormalities on cardiotrophic monitoring and underwent successful cesarean delivery. CONCLUSIONS Fetal death was more likely with greater severity of injury. Cardiotrophic monitoring is underused in injured pregnant patients in their third trimester even after admission to major trauma centers. Increased use of cardiotrophic monitoring may decrease the mortality caused by placental abruption.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F B Rogers
- Department of Surgery, Fletcher Allen Health Care, Burlington, VT 05401, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|